State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive
Continuing previous meetings: Forum Carpaticum 2010 (Krakow, Poland), Forum Carpaticum 2012 (Stará Lesná, Slovakia), Forum Carpaticum 2014 (Lviv, Ukraine), Forum Carpaticum 2016 (Bucharest, Romania) addresses the need to make a bridge of smart sustainable development in the Carpathians with scientists, stakeholders, institutions, NGOs, communities. The Carpathian Region – the Green Backbone of Europe – faces many opportunities as well as challenges to the future development of the area. The stakeholders, decision makers and research communities can use them wisely for the enhanced protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. These overall goals meet well with the EU 2020 Cohesion Policy, which proposes “Smart”, “Sustainable” and “Inclusive” to be the keywords when addressing the main priorities for the near future. Forum Carpaticum 2016 „Future of the Carpathians: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive“ proposes to concentrate on these priorities and to debate how they can be implemented in the Carpathian Region, during the following main thematic sessions: Smart Carpathians session aims to present and discuss the leading edge achievements in: recent and future information and communication technologies; emerging paradigms and methodological developments; front-rank research infrastructures, capacities and innovations; open knowledge, information and data systems applications, in particular those of Carpathian interest. Sustainable Carpathians is expected to cover the topics that consider: climate change adaptation, risk prevention -
Environment of the Slovak Republic in 1993-2003
Slovak environmental agency Centre for Environmental Policy and Informatics Banska Bystrica BASIC DATA ON THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Basic geographical and demographical data on the Slovak Republic Size and borders of the Slovak Republic Population by basic age categories (as of December 31, 2002) - in thousands of people Indicator Size as of 31. 12.2001 (km2) 49035 Length of borders (km, %) total, 1 672 (100.0%) including with: • Czech Republic 251.8(15.1%) • Hungary 668.6 (40.0%) • Poland 547.1 (32.7%) • Austria 106.0 (6.3%) • Ukraine 98.5 (5.9%) Lowest point: outflow of the Bodrog river from SI 94 (above the sea level) Highest point: Gerlachovsky stit (above the sea 2 655 v tis. os6b level.) □ Men | Women Source: SU SR Source: SU SR Density of population in Slovak districts in 2002 Source: SU SR Size of land per capita by regions (ha) - as Size and population count by regions - as of of December 31, 2002 December 31, 2002 count population Source: SU SR Source: SU SR AIR EMISSIONS Emissions of nitrogen oxides Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) have shown insignificant reduction since 1990. Slight increase in emissions (releases from pollution sources into the immediate environment) in 1995 was related to increased consumption of natural gas. Decrease in 1996 was caused by a change to the emission factor that took into consideration the current level of equipment and technology of incineration processes. Reduction in solid fuel consumption since 1997 has led to a further decrease in NOx emissions. NOx emissions in 2001 dropped approximately by 50.8% when compared to 1990. -
Is New Spread of the European Beaver in Pannonian Basin an Evidence of the Species Recovery?
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY EJE 2016, 2(2): 44-63, doi: 10.1515/eje-2016-0015 Is new spread of the European beaver in Pannonian basin an evidence of the species recovery? 1* 2, 3 4 5 6 1Institute of Biology and Alexander Čanády , Peter Krišovský Bálint Bajomi , Attila Huber , Dávid Czabán , Milan Olekšák Ecology, Faculty of Sci- ence, P.J. Šafárik Univer- sity, Šrobárova 2, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovakia ABSTRACT Corresponding author, Abstract: During fieldwork from 6 June to 20 July 2016, the first records of the European beaver (Castor fiber) E-mail: alexander. [email protected] in south-eastern Slovakia were made. Beavers are mainly nocturnal animals, and as such, they are rarely ob- served; therefore, our observations were based on searching for beaver presence signs: damaged trees, dams, 2 The East Slovak Mu- signs of food consumption (chewed/felled trees) and footprints in the mud. The southern part of the Košická seum Košice, Námestie kotlina basin, from the city of Košice down to the state border and the surrounding villages in Hungary, was Maratónu mieru 2, SK- 040 01 Košice, Slovakia checked. We found two beaver locations via feeding signs in the vicinity of the Slovakia–Hungary state border, at the villages of Milhosť (Miglécnémeti) and Buzica (Buzita), in Slovakia. According to our calculations, the pre- 3 Independent scholar, sent total beaver population in Hungary is between 4,000 and 5,000 and 14,600–18,300 beavers with potential H-1118, Tűzkő utca 1., support. For Slovakia, we estimated the potential population size to be 7,700–9,600. -
Poloniny National Park Management Plan
State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica Poloniny National Park Administration, Stak čín POLONINY NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 July 2015 1. BASIC DETAILS ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Number according to the national catalogue if assigned ............................................................................. 2 1.2. Inclusion in a European network of protected areas and areas of international significance ...................... 2 1.3. Category and name of the area .................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Legal regulation declaring the protected area or an international certificate on the inclusion of the area into a network of areas of international significance ........................................................................... 2 1.5. Total area of the protected area and its buffer zone..................................................................................... 3 1.6. Current state of the object of conservation .................................................................................................. 3 1.6.1. Natural conditions (geographic location, geological, geomorphological, climatic, hydrological and soil conditions, biotopes, flora, significant abiotic phenomena, landscape elements)................... 7 1.6.1.1. Geographic location.................................................................................................................... -
Flood Risk Assessment and Management in Slovakia
River Basin Management VI 61 Flood risk assessment and management in Slovakia M. Zeleňáková Institute of Building and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Slovakia Abstract In recent years, the growth of population and the diffusion of settlements over flood vulnerable areas have increased the impact of floods worldwide. Natural disasters such as floods have constituted a major problem in many countries worldwide. Floods have caused immense economic and social losses, mainly as a result of unplanned urbanization, uncontrolled population density and not strictly inspected construction by authorities. Flood damages that have arisen on watercourses and hydraulic structures on the territory of the Slovak Republic have been huge. The most affected area is the eastern part of Slovakia, where the most complex situation is in the Laborec, Topľa, Ondava, Torysa, Latorica and Hornád river basins in the recent years, mainly in 2010. This contribution presents flood risk assessment and management in these territories. Keywords: flood risk assessment, flood risk management, directive 2007/60/EC. 1 Introduction A new comprehensive approach on flood risk assessment and management on a European level has been triggered, especially after the large-scale flooding of 2002 in central Europe, with an estimated damage of 16.5 billion US$ (2002: 1 US$ = 1€). The European Commission issued a Communication about flood risk management [1] in 2004. This initiative was followed by the adoption by the European parliament and the council of Directive -
Zberný Dvor V Obci Stakčín
ZZbbeerrnnýý ddvvoorr vv oobbccii SSttaakkččíínn.. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––--- I. ZÁKLADNÉ ÚDAJE O NAVRHOVATEĽOVI 1. Názov. Obec Stakčín 2. Identifikačné číslo. IČO: 00323578 3. Sídlo. SNP 574/6 067 61 Stakčín Tel.: 0903 610 386 E-mail: [email protected] 4. Meno, priezvisko, adresa, telefónne číslo a iné kontaktné údaje oprávneného zástupcu obstarávateľa. Miroslav Bober SNP 574/6 067 61 Stakčín Tel.: 0903 610 386 E-mail: [email protected] 5. Meno, priezvisko, adresa, telefónne číslo a iné kontaktné údaje kontaktnej osoby, od ktorej možno dostať relevantné informácie o navrhovanej činnosti a miesto na konzultácie. Miroslav Bober SNP 574/6 067 61 Stakčín Tel.: 0903 610 386 E-mail: [email protected] Miesto na konzultácie: Obecný úrad Stakčín –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Obec Stakčín, SNP 574/6, 067 61 Stakčín Strana 1 z 65 ZZbbeerrnnýý ddvvoorr vv oobbccii SSttaakkččíínn.. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– II. ZÁKLADNÉ ÚDAJE -
Maps -- by Region Or Country -- Eastern Hemisphere -- Europe
G5702 EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5702 Alps see G6035+ .B3 Baltic Sea .B4 Baltic Shield .C3 Carpathian Mountains .C6 Coasts/Continental shelf .G4 Genoa, Gulf of .G7 Great Alföld .P9 Pyrenees .R5 Rhine River .S3 Scheldt River .T5 Tisza River 1971 G5722 WESTERN EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL G5722 FEATURES, ETC. .A7 Ardennes .A9 Autoroute E10 .F5 Flanders .G3 Gaul .M3 Meuse River 1972 G5741.S BRITISH ISLES. HISTORY G5741.S .S1 General .S2 To 1066 .S3 Medieval period, 1066-1485 .S33 Norman period, 1066-1154 .S35 Plantagenets, 1154-1399 .S37 15th century .S4 Modern period, 1485- .S45 16th century: Tudors, 1485-1603 .S5 17th century: Stuarts, 1603-1714 .S53 Commonwealth and protectorate, 1660-1688 .S54 18th century .S55 19th century .S6 20th century .S65 World War I .S7 World War II 1973 G5742 BRITISH ISLES. GREAT BRITAIN. REGIONS, G5742 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Continental shelf .I6 Irish Sea .N3 National Cycle Network 1974 G5752 ENGLAND. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5752 .A3 Aire River .A42 Akeman Street .A43 Alde River .A7 Arun River .A75 Ashby Canal .A77 Ashdown Forest .A83 Avon, River [Gloucestershire-Avon] .A85 Avon, River [Leicestershire-Gloucestershire] .A87 Axholme, Isle of .A9 Aylesbury, Vale of .B3 Barnstaple Bay .B35 Basingstoke Canal .B36 Bassenthwaite Lake .B38 Baugh Fell .B385 Beachy Head .B386 Belvoir, Vale of .B387 Bere, Forest of .B39 Berkeley, Vale of .B4 Berkshire Downs .B42 Beult, River .B43 Bignor Hill .B44 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal .B45 Black Country .B48 Black Hill .B49 Blackdown Hills .B493 Blackmoor [Moor] .B495 Blackmoor Vale .B5 Bleaklow Hill .B54 Blenheim Park .B6 Bodmin Moor .B64 Border Forest Park .B66 Bourne Valley .B68 Bowland, Forest of .B7 Breckland .B715 Bredon Hill .B717 Brendon Hills .B72 Bridgewater Canal .B723 Bridgwater Bay .B724 Bridlington Bay .B725 Bristol Channel .B73 Broads, The .B76 Brown Clee Hill .B8 Burnham Beeches .B84 Burntwick Island .C34 Cam, River .C37 Cannock Chase .C38 Canvey Island [Island] 1975 G5752 ENGLAND. -
European Beaver in Pannonian Basin an Evidence of the Species Recovery?
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY EJE 2016, 2(2): 44-63, doi: 10.1515/eje-2016-0015 Is new spread of the European beaver in Pannonian basin an evidence of the species recovery? 1* 2, 3 4 5 6 1Institute of Biology and Alexander Čanády , Peter Krišovský Bálint Bajomi , Attila Huber , Dávid Czabán , Milan Olekšák Ecology, Faculty of Sci- ence, P.J. Šafárik Univer- sity, Šrobárova 2, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovakia ABSTRACT Corresponding author, Abstract: During fieldwork from 6 June to 20 July 2016, the first records of the European beaver (Castor fiber) E-mail: alexander. [email protected] in south-eastern Slovakia were made. Beavers are mainly nocturnal animals, and as such, they are rarely ob- served; therefore, our observations were based on searching for beaver presence signs: damaged trees, dams, 2 The East Slovak Mu- signs of food consumption (chewed/felled trees) and footprints in the mud. The southern part of the Košická seum Košice, Námestie kotlina basin, from the city of Košice down to the state border and the surrounding villages in Hungary, was Maratónu mieru 2, SK- 040 01 Košice, Slovakia checked. We found two beaver locations via feeding signs in the vicinity of the Slovakia–Hungary state border, at the villages of Milhosť (Miglécnémeti) and Buzica (Buzita), in Slovakia. According to our calculations, the pre- 3 Independent scholar, sent total beaver population in Hungary is between 4,000 and 5,000 and 14,600–18,300 beavers with potential H-1118, Tűzkő utca 1., support. For Slovakia, we estimated the potential population size to be 7,700–9,600. -
State of Conservation Report by The
Report of the State Party on the State of Conservation of the World Heritage Property Inscribed on the World Heritage List Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech Forests of Germany (Slovakia N 1133bis) The Slovak Republic appreciates that the property "Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech Forests of Germany" has been inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List. Through the competent government ministries and their competences, the Slovak Republic resolves the issues identified in Decision no. 39 COM 7B.19 of the World Heritage Committee, adopted at its 39th session in Bonn, and expresses its interest in keeping the property inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List. 1. Executive summary of the report The Slovak part of the UNESCO World Heritage Property was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2007 under the name “Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians” as a bilateral Slovak and Ukrainian property. In 2011, after the extension by additional components in Germany, it became part of the trilateral property "Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech Forests of Germany". At the level of the State, the Slovak part of the property is covered by the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, and in compliance with the valid legislation, the expert organisation of the Ministry the State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic is responsible for management and protection. In connection with the issues in the territory of the Slovak part of the property identified in Decision of the World Heritage Committee 39 COM 7B.19 and based on the recommendations resulting from the conclusions of the IUCN UNESCO reactive monitoring mission, which took place on 29 September to 3 October 2014, the Member State Slovakia organised an advisory mission in the territory of the Slovak part of the property. -
5. Slovakia – Hydrological Patterns 1
5. Slovakia – Hydrological patterns 1 § the Main European watershed passes on the northern edge of the Carpathian Mountains => § divides the Slovak rivers into the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea drainage basins: Divide the largest drainage basins according to the seas: o the Danube and Tisza river: ……………………………………… drainage basin o the Dunajec and Poprad river: ……………………………………… drainage basin 96% of all Slovak rivers are part of the Black Sea drainage basin which is divided into 3 river drainage basins: the Morava river, the Danube and Tisza drainage basins Rivers The Danube = the largest river in Central Europe, it springs in Germany, with most of its water coming from the Alps, southern state border Tributaries: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… The Morava River = begins in CZ, it creates a state border on the west of the country and flows into the Danube Tributaries: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… The Váh River = the longest Slovak river (402,5 km) created by two smaller rivers: …………………………… Tributaries: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Find the hills where the two little brooks of the Váh river have their spring! The Nitra River = it originates nearby Mt. Kľak in the Malá Fatra mountains Tributaries: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Which mountains does this river flow through? The Hron River = it begins under Mt. Kraľová hoľa, it has narrow drainage basin with river networks Tributaries: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… The Ipeľ River = it stems in the Slovenské Rudohorie mountains, it flows through -
Comparison of Sediment Quality in River Basins In
E. Singovszka, M. Balintova Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Environmental Engineering COMPARISON OF SEDIMENT QUALITY IN RIVER BASINS IN EASTERN SLOVAKIA © Singovszka E., Balintova M., 2017 The contamination of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems with heavy metals and other mining chemicals have been major environmental problems in many mining areas of the world. Industrial wastes, geochemical structure and metals mining form a potential source of metal contaminants in the aquatic environment especially in sediment. Monitoring sediment quality is one of the highest priorities in environmental protection policies. For better knowledge about migration, transformation behaviour and rules of heavy metals in sediment, it is necessary to make an accurate assessment of contamination level and extent at each site. The aim of this study is to assess the river sediment quality in the territory of East of Slovakia, representing the water basins of the rivers Hornad, Laborec, Torysa, Ondava and Topla. Sampling points were selected based on the current surface water quality monitoring network. Investigation was focused on heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Pb, Cd, Ni, Hg, As, Fe, Mn). The content of heavy metals reflected the scale of industrial and mining activities in a particular locality. The sediment quality was evaluated using potential ecological risk index for heavy metals concentrations in the samples. Key words: sediment, heavy metals, potential ecological risk index. Е. Сінговжка, М. Балінтова Технічний університет в Кошице, Словаччина, факультет будівництва, інститут інженерії довкілля ПОРІВНЯННЯ ЯКОСТІ ВІДКЛАДЕНЬ РІЧКОВИХ БАСЕЙНІВ У СХІДНІЙ СЛОВАЧЧИНІ © Сінговжка Е., Балінтова М., 2017 Забруднення водних та наземних екосистем з важкими металами та іншими гірничодобувними хімічними речовинами є основними екологічними проблемами в багатьох гірничодобувних районах світу. -
Predbežné Hodnotenie Povodňového Rizika V Čiastkovom Povodí Bodrogu
MINISTERSTVO ŽIVOTNÉHO PROSTREDIA SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY SLOVENSKÝ VODOHOSPODÁRSKY PODNIK, ŠTÁTNY PODNIK Implementácia smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady 2007/60/ES z 23. októbra 2007 o hodnotení a manažmente povodňových rizík Predbežné hodnotenie povodňového rizika v čiastkovom povodí Bodrogu Prílohy December 2011 Predbežné hodnotenie povodňového rizika v čiastkovom povodí Bodrogu – príloha I i OBSAH Príloha I. Územno-správne jednotky v čiastkovom povodí Bodrogu ........................................ 1 Príloha II. Zoznam vodných tokov a obcí, v ktorých bol v období rokov 1997 – 2010 aspoň raz vyhlásený III. stupeň povodňovej aktivity .......................................................... 3 Príloha III. Prehľad príčin a následkov povodní ...................................................................... 25 Príloha IV. Závery predbežného hodnotenia povodňového rizka............................................ 59 Predbežné hodnotenie povodňového rizika v čiastkovom povodí Bodrogu – príloha I 1 PRÍLOHA I. ÚZEMNO-SPRÁVNE JEDNOTKY V ČIASTKOVOM POVODÍ BODROGU Číslo hydrologického poradia Kraj Okres Bardejov Humenné Medzilaborce Prešov Prešovský Snina Stropkov 4-30 Svidník Vranov nad Topľou Košice – okolie Michalovce Košický Sobrance Trebišov Predbežné hodnotenie povodňového rizika v čiastkovom povodí Bodrogu – príloha II 3 PRÍLOHA II. ZOZNAM VODNÝCH TOKOV A OBCÍ, V KTORÝCH BOL V OBDOBÍ ROKOV 1997 – 2010 ASPOŇ RAZ VYHLÁSENÝ III. STUPEŇ POVODŇOVEJ AKTIVITY Obec Rok, v ktorom bol aspoň raz vyhlásený III. stupňa povodňovej aktivity ) 0 v 1 u o l 0 ľ t o 2 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 e e Vodný tok Okres t p . 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 č a 2 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Názov obce S o v 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 P y .