DOCSLIB.ORG

Poloniny National Park Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poloniny National Park Management Plan State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica Poloniny National Park Administration, Stak čín POLONINY NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 July 2015 1. BASIC DETAILS ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Number according to the national catalogue if assigned ............................................................................. 2 1.2. Inclusion in a European network of protected areas and areas of international significance ...................... 2 1.3. Category and name of the area .................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Legal regulation declaring the protected area or an international certificate on the inclusion of the area into a network of areas of international significance ........................................................................... 2 1.5. Total area of the protected area and its buffer zone..................................................................................... 3 1.6. Current state of the object of conservation .................................................................................................. 3 1.6.1. Natural conditions (geographic location, geological, geomorphological, climatic, hydrological and soil conditions, biotopes, flora, significant abiotic phenomena, landscape elements)................... 7 1.6.1.1. Geographic location..................................................................................................................... 7 1.6.1.2. Geology........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6.1.3. Geomorphology ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.6.1.4. Climatic conditions...................................................................................................................... 8 1.6.1.5. Soil conditions ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.6.1.6. Hydrography................................................................................................................................ 8 1.6.1.7. Biotopes, flora, associations ........................................................................................................ 9 1.6.1.8. Fauna ......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.6.1.9. Significant abiotic phenomena................................................................................................... 15 1.6.1.10. Landscape elements ................................................................................................................. 16 1.6.2. Brief description of the object of conservation ................................................................................... 16 1.6.3. Evaluating the status of the object of conservation, setting conservation priorities............................ 20 1.6.4. Evaluation of other specific interests of nature and landscape conservation in the area..................... 34 1.7. Results of the Comprehensive Forest Condition Survey ........................................................................... 38 2. Socio-economic conditions: use of the area and its surroundings, positive and negative factors)........ Chyba! Záložka nie je definovaná. 2.1. Historical overview ................................................................................................................................... 41 2.2. Brief description of current situation......................................................................................................... 42 2.2.1. Conservation ...................................................................................................................................... 42 2.2.2 Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................... 42 2.2.3 Forestry .............................................................................................................................................. 44 2.2.4 Hunting............................................................................................................................................... 48 2.2.5 Fishery................................................................................................................................................ 49 2.2.6 Mining and quarrying......................................................................................................................... 50 2.2.7 Use of water ....................................................................................................................................... 50 2.2.8. Recreation and sports ......................................................................................................................... 51 2.2.8.1 Tourist activities .................................................................................................................. 51 2.2.8.2 Accommodation facilties ..................................................................................................... 52 2.2.9. Cultural heritage and religious activity............................................................................................... 53 2.3 Proposed principles and measures for using the national park and the surrounding area in terms of conservation objectives ............................................................................................................................. 57 3. Care objectives and achievement measures .................................................................................................. 60 3.1. The establishment of long-term care objectives linked to functional ecological spaces and zones........... 60 3.2 The establishment of operational objectives related to ecological functional spaces................................ 60 3.3. Framework planning and models of management for forest biotopes....................................................... 62 3.4. The proposed measures, the setting of a timetable for their fulfilment, the determination of entities responsible for their fulfilment, and the setting of measurable fulfilment indicators................................ 69 4. The means of evaluating the fulfilment of the forest care programme ......................................................... 70 5. Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................. 71 6. Minimal Annexes.......................................................................................................................................... 74 1 POLONINY NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. BASIC DETAILS 1.1. Number according to the national catalogue if assigned Not assigned. 1.2. Inclusion in a European network of protected areas and areas of international significance Protected bird area: SKCHVÚ002 Bukovské vrchy declared by Decree of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic No. 25/2008 of 24 January 2008 Areas of European significance: A part belongs to SKUEV0210 Stinská, according to Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic No. 3/2004-5.1 of 14 July 2004 issuing a national catalogue of areas of European significance A part belongs to SKUEV0229 Bukovské vrchy, according to Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic No. 3/2004-5.1 of 14 July 2004 issuing a national catalogue of areas of European significance A part belongs to SKUEV0234 Uli čka, according to Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic No. 3/2004-5.1 of 14 July 2004 issuing a national catalogue of areas of European significance Areas of international significance: 1. A part of the area belongs to the Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech Forests of Germany which, in accordance with Decision of the World Heritage Committee No. 31 COM 8B.16, became a UNESCO World Heritage site in 2007. 2. The area is part of the International Biosphere Reserve of the Eastern Carpathians included in the global network of biosphere reserves by the decision of the Coordinating Council of the UNESCO programme on Man and the Biosphere in 1992. 3. The area has held the European Diploma, awarded by the Council of Europe, since 1998. 1.3. Category and name of the area Category: national park Name of the area: Poloniny 1.4. Legal regulation declaring the protected area or an international certificate on the inclusion of the area into a network of areas of international significance The Poloniny National Park (hereinafter only “Poloniny NP”) was declared by Regulation of the Government of the Slovak Republic No. 258/1997 declaring the Poloniny NP. The Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians as an area belonging to two states (Slovakia and Ukraine) was inscribed onto the UNESCO World Heritage List under number 1133 based on Decision of the World Heritage Committee No. 31 COM 8B.16, adopted at its 31st meeting on 23 2 June–2 July 2007 in Christchurch, New Zealand (http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/1314 ). The area was later extended to include German areas and became
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive
    Continuing previous meetings: Forum Carpaticum 2010 (Krakow, Poland), Forum Carpaticum 2012 (Stará Lesná, Slovakia), Forum Carpaticum 2014 (Lviv, Ukraine), Forum Carpaticum 2016 (Bucharest, Romania) addresses the need to make a bridge of smart sustainable development in the Carpathians with scientists, stakeholders, institutions, NGOs, communities. The Carpathian Region – the Green Backbone of Europe – faces many opportunities as well as challenges to the future development of the area. The stakeholders, decision makers and research communities can use them wisely for the enhanced protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. These overall goals meet well with the EU 2020 Cohesion Policy, which proposes “Smart”, “Sustainable” and “Inclusive” to be the keywords when addressing the main priorities for the near future. Forum Carpaticum 2016 „Future of the Carpathians: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive“ proposes to concentrate on these priorities and to debate how they can be implemented in the Carpathian Region, during the following main thematic sessions: Smart Carpathians session aims to present and discuss the leading edge achievements in: recent and future information and communication technologies; emerging paradigms and methodological developments; front-rank research infrastructures, capacities and innovations; open knowledge, information and data systems applications, in particular those of Carpathian interest. Sustainable Carpathians is expected to cover the topics that consider: climate change adaptation, risk prevention
    [Show full text]
  • Environment of the Slovak Republic in 1993-2003
    Slovak environmental agency Centre for Environmental Policy and Informatics Banska Bystrica BASIC DATA ON THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Basic geographical and demographical data on the Slovak Republic Size and borders of the Slovak Republic Population by basic age categories (as of December 31, 2002) - in thousands of people Indicator Size as of 31. 12.2001 (km2) 49035 Length of borders (km, %) total, 1 672 (100.0%) including with: • Czech Republic 251.8(15.1%) • Hungary 668.6 (40.0%) • Poland 547.1 (32.7%) • Austria 106.0 (6.3%) • Ukraine 98.5 (5.9%) Lowest point: outflow of the Bodrog river from SI 94 (above the sea level) Highest point: Gerlachovsky stit (above the sea 2 655 v tis. os6b level.) □ Men | Women Source: SU SR Source: SU SR Density of population in Slovak districts in 2002 Source: SU SR Size of land per capita by regions (ha) - as Size and population count by regions - as of of December 31, 2002 December 31, 2002 count population Source: SU SR Source: SU SR AIR EMISSIONS Emissions of nitrogen oxides Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) have shown insignificant reduction since 1990. Slight increase in emissions (releases from pollution sources into the immediate environment) in 1995 was related to increased consumption of natural gas. Decrease in 1996 was caused by a change to the emission factor that took into consideration the current level of equipment and technology of incineration processes. Reduction in solid fuel consumption since 1997 has led to a further decrease in NOx emissions. NOx emissions in 2001 dropped approximately by 50.8% when compared to 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Is New Spread of the European Beaver in Pannonian Basin an Evidence of the Species Recovery?
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY EJE 2016, 2(2): 44-63, doi: 10.1515/eje-2016-0015 Is new spread of the European beaver in Pannonian basin an evidence of the species recovery? 1* 2, 3 4 5 6 1Institute of Biology and Alexander Čanády , Peter Krišovský Bálint Bajomi , Attila Huber , Dávid Czabán , Milan Olekšák Ecology, Faculty of Sci- ence, P.J. Šafárik Univer- sity, Šrobárova 2, SK-041 54 Košice, Slovakia ABSTRACT Corresponding author, Abstract: During fieldwork from 6 June to 20 July 2016, the first records of the European beaver (Castor fiber) E-mail: alexander. [email protected] in south-eastern Slovakia were made. Beavers are mainly nocturnal animals, and as such, they are rarely ob- served; therefore, our observations were based on searching for beaver presence signs: damaged trees, dams, 2 The East Slovak Mu- signs of food consumption (chewed/felled trees) and footprints in the mud. The southern part of the Košická seum Košice, Námestie kotlina basin, from the city of Košice down to the state border and the surrounding villages in Hungary, was Maratónu mieru 2, SK- 040 01 Košice, Slovakia checked. We found two beaver locations via feeding signs in the vicinity of the Slovakia–Hungary state border, at the villages of Milhosť (Miglécnémeti) and Buzica (Buzita), in Slovakia. According to our calculations, the pre- 3 Independent scholar, sent total beaver population in Hungary is between 4,000 and 5,000 and 14,600–18,300 beavers with potential H-1118, Tűzkő utca 1., support. For Slovakia, we estimated the potential population size to be 7,700–9,600.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management in Slovakia
    River Basin Management VI 61 Flood risk assessment and management in Slovakia M. Zeleňáková Institute of Building and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Slovakia Abstract In recent years, the growth of population and the diffusion of settlements over flood vulnerable areas have increased the impact of floods worldwide. Natural disasters such as floods have constituted a major problem in many countries worldwide. Floods have caused immense economic and social losses, mainly as a result of unplanned urbanization, uncontrolled population density and not strictly inspected construction by authorities. Flood damages that have arisen on watercourses and hydraulic structures on the territory of the Slovak Republic have been huge. The most affected area is the eastern part of Slovakia, where the most complex situation is in the Laborec, Topľa, Ondava, Torysa, Latorica and Hornád river basins in the recent years, mainly in 2010. This contribution presents flood risk assessment and management in these territories. Keywords: flood risk assessment, flood risk management, directive 2007/60/EC. 1 Introduction A new comprehensive approach on flood risk assessment and management on a European level has been triggered, especially after the large-scale flooding of 2002 in central Europe, with an estimated damage of 16.5 billion US$ (2002: 1 US$ = 1€). The European Commission issued a Communication about flood risk management [1] in 2004. This initiative was followed by the adoption by the European parliament and the council of Directive
    [Show full text]
  • PE-S-DE (2003) 5 [Diplome/Docs/2003/De05e 03] Abridged Version
    Strasbourg, 18 December 2002 PE-S-DE (2003) 5 [diplome/docs/2003/de05e_03] abridged version Committee for the activities of the Council of Europe in the field of biological and landscape diversity (CO-DBP) Group of specialists – European Diploma for Protected Areas 20-21 January 2003 Room 2, Palais de l'Europe, Strasbourg Poloniny National Park (Slovakia) RENEWAL Expert report by Mr Charles Zimmer (Luxembourg) Document established by the Directorate of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. PE-S-DE (2003) 5 - 2 - The European Diploma for protected areas was awarded to the Poloniny National Park (Slovakia) for the first time in 1998. This is the first renewal. The Secretariat did not accompany the expert on his visit to the site. Appendix III reproduces Resolution (98) 26 concerning the award of the Diploma. In Appendix IV the Secretariat presents a draft resolution for possible renewal. * * * * * Introduction THE NATIONAL CONTEXT In 1993 Slovakia became an independent state with its own legislation, including in the environmental and nature protection field: 128 / 1991 Law on the setting up of the National environment fund, 453 / 1992 Law on the creation of the Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic, 287 / 1994 Law on nature and landscape protection. Slovakia has ratified most of the international conventions on nature protection. At present the country is bringing its legislation into line with that of the European Union, including the "Birds" and "Habitats" directives.
    [Show full text]
  • Support for the Least Developed Districts and Regional Development in Slovak Republic Roma Advocacy and Research Center
    With the financial support of the International Visegrad Fund Support for the least developed districts and regional development in Slovak republic Roma advocacy and research center Introduction In Slovakia we have several initiatives that try to address regional differences. One of them is Community led local development - CLLD. CLLD is a tool for involving local actors in deciding on the social, environmental and economic development of their territory. It is based on the bottom-up principle and on the LEADER signs, so far used only as a separate initiative of the European Union and later as part of rural development programs. Basically, representatives of the microregion in question will determine their own development priorities (strategy) and, after approval by the governing body, carry out their own selection of projects. This approach is implemented through Integrated Local Development Strategies (ILDSs), respectively. CLLD strategies, which are developed with respect to local needs and capabilities, and include innovative elements linked to local situations, networking and, where appropriate, cooperation. The promoter and holder of the ILDS is a territorially competent public-private partnership that acquires the status of a Local Action Group (LAG) upon its approval by the competent authority. Another tool to alleviate regional disparities is a program to support the least developed districts. Economic growth and development in the Slovak Republic highlighted the differences between regions and districts of Slovakia. If the majority of the population benefits from the growth, the least developed regions suffer from a high rate of unemployment, the departure of the young and educated workforce, and a lack of investment and entrepreneurial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur
    LOG EO ICK G Ý Y Ú N S T T Á A T V Š M E O D NT LE E ET MAL IO A N R ÝZA ŠT Ú STATE GEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF DIONYZ STUR ● SGUDS is a scientific-research organization of the Ministry of the Environment SR. ● The Institute was established in 1940. ● The seat is in Bratislava regional centres are in Spišská Nová Ves, Banská Bystrica and Košice. ● In 2005 the Institute had 313 employees. ● In 2005 the Institute’s budget was 186 mil. Sk. Introduction 1 Organization scheme 2 Division of Geology 4 Workshops and conferences 15 Geofond 16 Geoanalytical laboratories 20 Electron microanalysis 22 Department of Cartography /GIS 24 Isotope Geology 25 Department of Informatics RC Spišská Nová Ves 26 Publishing activity 27 International co-operation 28 Marketing and propagation 30 CONTENT SGUDS Budget 32 Photo: L. Martinský. The State Geological institute of Dionyz Stur performs the State geological service in the field of geological research and exploration of the Slovak Republic territory. The recent abrupt changes in the economic conditions and mainly the requirements of the society in utilisation and dissemination of geological information have influenced also the Institute’s activities. Our efforts aim at most effective application of the geological research and explo- ration results in the economy, landscape potential as well as in the protec- tion and creation of the environment. In the year 2005 there occurred significant organizational changes in the scope of rationalization effectiveness of the carried out geological activities. On July 1, 2005 there was established the Division of Geology by merging former Divisions of Geological Mapping and Research, Envi- ronmental Geology and Raw Minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • Zberný Dvor V Obci Stakčín
    ZZbbeerrnnýý ddvvoorr vv oobbccii SSttaakkččíínn.. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––--- I. ZÁKLADNÉ ÚDAJE O NAVRHOVATEĽOVI 1. Názov. Obec Stakčín 2. Identifikačné číslo. IČO: 00323578 3. Sídlo. SNP 574/6 067 61 Stakčín Tel.: 0903 610 386 E-mail: [email protected] 4. Meno, priezvisko, adresa, telefónne číslo a iné kontaktné údaje oprávneného zástupcu obstarávateľa. Miroslav Bober SNP 574/6 067 61 Stakčín Tel.: 0903 610 386 E-mail: [email protected] 5. Meno, priezvisko, adresa, telefónne číslo a iné kontaktné údaje kontaktnej osoby, od ktorej možno dostať relevantné informácie o navrhovanej činnosti a miesto na konzultácie. Miroslav Bober SNP 574/6 067 61 Stakčín Tel.: 0903 610 386 E-mail: [email protected] Miesto na konzultácie: Obecný úrad Stakčín –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Obec Stakčín, SNP 574/6, 067 61 Stakčín Strana 1 z 65 ZZbbeerrnnýý ddvvoorr vv oobbccii SSttaakkččíínn.. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– II. ZÁKLADNÉ ÚDAJE
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Poloniny 2013 1
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR NATIONAL PARK POLONINY 2013 1, State: The Slovak Republic Name of the area: National Park POLONINY (the “Poloniny NP”) Central authority concerned: Name: Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic (the “Ministry”) Division of Nature Protection and Landscape Development Address: Nám. Ľ. Štúra 1; 812 35 Bratislava 1, Slovak Republic Tel: (+ 421 2) 5956 2211; Fax: (+ 421 2) 5956 2477 e-mail: [email protected] (contact person); www: www.enviro.gov.sk Authority responsible for its management: Name: State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Administration of the Poloniny National Park (the “Poloniny NP”) Address: Ul. mieru 193; 067 67 Stakčín, Slovak Republic Tel: (+ 421 57) 768 5615 Fax: (+ 421 57) 768 5615 e-mail: [email protected] www: www.sopsr.sk/nppoloniny/ I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Natural heritage (general abiotic description: geomorphology, geology and hydrogeology, habitats, flora, fauna, landscape) ─ State of conservation 1.1. Environment: changes or deterioration in the environment, of natural or anthropic origin, accidental or permanent, actual or anticipated There were no new significant changes or deterioration in the environment during the referred period. 1.2. Flora and vegetation: changes in the plant population and in the vegetation cover: No significant changes. 1.3. Fauna: changes in the sedentary or migratory populations, congregating and breeding places. No significant changes. In the referred period the monitoring of the selected species populations further continued. One example is the project on inventory of selected bird species (Crex crex, Aquila pomarina, Alcedo atthis, Strix uralensis, Picus canus, Dendrocopos leucotos, Ficedula parva, Lanius excubitor, Bonasa bonasia,Caprimulgus europaeus) within the Special Protected Areas to define the favourable conservation status of these species as a basis for development of SPAs management plans, identification of the current state and trends of their populations/habitats and verification and update of long-term monitoring methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • (The East Carpathians, Slovakia) 2007
    Milan Novikmec, Marek Svitok & Peter Bitušík (eds.) Milan Novikmec, Marek Svitok, Eva Bulánková, Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová, Tomáš Derka, Jozef Halgoš, Ladislav Hamerlík, Daniela Illéšová, Marta Illyová, Iľja Krno, Jozef Lukáš, Danka Némethová, Zuzana Pastuchová, Slavomír Stašiov, Ferdinand Šporka, Elena Štefková, Eva Tirjaková, Jozef Tomajka & Peter Bitušík LIMNOLOGY OF STREAMS IN THE POLONINY NATIONAL PARK (THE EAST CARPATHIANS, SLOVAKIA) 2007 TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN FACULTY OF ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Milan Novikmec, Marek Svitok & Peter Bitušík (eds.) Milan Novikmec, Marek Svitok, Eva Bulánková, Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová, Tomáš Derka, Jozef Halgoš, Ladislav Hamerlík, Daniela Illéšová, Marta Illyová, Iľja Krno, Jozef Lukáš, Danka Némethová, Zuzana Pastuchová, Slavomír Stašiov, Ferdinand Šporka, Elena Štefková, Eva Tirjaková, Jozef Tomajka & Peter Bitušík LIMNOLOGY OF STREAMS IN THE POLONINY NATIONAL PARK (THE EAST CARPATHIANS, SLOVAKIA) 2007 Reviewers: Jarmila Makovinská Igor Hudec © Milan Novikmec, Marek Svitok, Eva Bulánková, Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová, Tomáš Derka, Jozef Halgoš, Ladislav Hamerlík, Daniela Illéšová, Marta Illyová, Iľja Krno, Jozef Lukáš, Danka Némethová, Zuzana Pastuchová, Slavomír Stašiov, Ferdinand Šporka, Elena Štefková, Eva Tirjaková, Jozef Tomajka & Peter Bitušík Authors: Milan Novikmec1, Marek Svitok1, Eva Bulánková2, Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová3, Tomáš Derka2, Jozef Halgoš2, Ladislav Hamerlík3, Daniela Illéšová4, Marta Illyová3, Iľja Krno2, Jozef Lukáš2, Danka Némethová6, Zuzana Pastuchová3,
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Differences in Public Transport Accessibility of District Centres in the Prešov Region, Slovakia
    Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society 2019, 22(1), 31-43 DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.19.003.10923 Received: 04.02.2019 Received in revised form: 04.03.2019 Accepted: 04.03.2019 Published: 29.03.2019 SPATIAL DIFFERENCES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY OF DISTRICT CENTRES IN THE PREŠOV REGION, SLOVAKIA Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie dostępności transportu publicznego w kraju preszowskim (Słowacja) Vladimír Székely (1), Ján Novotný (2) (1) Institute of Geography, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 49, 814 73 Bratislava, Slovakia e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) (2) Institute of Geography, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 49, 814 73 Bratislava, Slovakia e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Székely V., Novotný J., 2019, Spatial differences in public transport accessibility of district centres in the Prešov region, Slovakia, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 22 (1), 31-43. Abstract: The issue of public transport accessibility of localities and regions is one of the key research themes of transport geography. The EU defines public transport as one of the services of “general economic interest”, which means that its organization should be based on the principles of solidarity and equal access for all citizens of the state and its regions. The study of transport accessibility of 13 district centres in the peripheral and economically underdeveloped Prešov administrative region (Slovakia) from the municipalities of their immediate hinterlands expressed by the number of direct bus and train connections is aimed at identifying the spatial differentiation of individual intraregional accessibilities. The realization of the research pursues the objective,to point out by the comparison of the theoretical and real values of direct transport connections, to the possible existence of discrepancies in the public transport services of individual municipalities in relation to their higher hierarchical district’s centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Reactive Monitoring
    World Heritage 39 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 16 January / 16 janvier 2015 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirty-ninth session / Trente-neuvième session Bonn, Germany / Bonn, Allemagne 28 June – 8 July 2015 / 28 juin – 8 juillet 2015 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech Forests of Germany (Germany, Slovakia, Ukraine) (1133bis) Forêts primaires de hêtres des Carpates et forêts anciennes de hêtres d’Allemagne (Allemagne, Slovaquie, Ukraine) (1133bis) 29 September – 3 October 2014 This mission report should be read in conjunction with Document: Ce rapport de mission doit être lu conjointement avec le document suivant: WHC-15/39.COM/ 7B.Add UNESCO World Heritage Centre – IUCN MISSION REPORT Reactive Monitoring Mission Slovak component sites of the World Heritage property Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and the Ancient Beech Forests of Germany (Ukraine, Germany, Slovakia) Slovakia, 29 September – 3 October 2014 Dr Pierre GALLAND UNESCO / IUCN October 2014 1/44 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1.
    [Show full text]