Baconian Essays

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Baconian Essays Ex Libris C. K. OGDEN THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.arcliive.org/details/baconianessaysOOsmit BACONIAN ESSAYS BACONIAN ESSAYS BY E. W. SMITHSON WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND TWO ESSAYS BY SIR GEORGE GREENWOOD LONDON CECIL PALMER OAKLEY HOUSE, 14-18 BLOOMSBURY ST., W.C. i First Edition Copy- right 1922 CONTENTS PAGE Introductory (by G. Greenwood) ... 7 Five Essays by E. W. Smithson The Masque of "Time Vindicated" . 41 Shakespeare—A Theory . .69 Ben Jonson and Shakespeare . .97 " " Bacon and Poesy . 123 " The Tempest" and Its Symbolism . 149 Two Essays by G. Greenwood The Common Knowledge of Shakespeare and Bacon 161 The Northumberland Manuscript . 187 Final Note (G. G.) . , . 223 J /',-S ^ a.^'1-^U- a BACONIAN ESSAYS INTRODUCTORY Henry James, in a letter to Miss Violet Hunt, thus delivers himself with regard to the authorship of " " — the plays and poems of Shakespeare * : " I am * a sort of ' haunted by the conviction that the divine William is the biggest and most successful fraud ever practised on a patient world. The more I turn him round and round the more he so affects me." Now I do not for a moment suppose that in so writing the late Mr. Henry James had any intention of affixing the stigma of personal fraud upon William Shakspere of Stratford-upon-Avon. Doubtless he used the term '* fraud " in a semi-jocular vein as we so often hear it made use of in the colloquial language of the present day, and his meaning is nothing more, and nothing less, than this, viz., that the beHef that the plays and poems of " Shake- speare " were, in truth and in fact, the work of " the man from Stratford," (as he subsequently, in the same letter, styles *' the divine William ") is one of the greatest of all the many delusions which have, * Letters of Henry James. Macmillan, 1920, Vol. I., p. 432. 7 — BACONIAN ESSAYS from time to time, afflicted a credulous and " a patient world." He believed that when, in the year 1593, the dedication of Venus and Adonis to the Young Earl of Southampton was signed " William Shakespeare," that signature did not, in truth and in fact, stand for the Stratford player who never so signed himself, but for a very different person, in quite another sphere of life, who desired to preserve his anonymity. He believed that when plays were published in the name of " Shake-speare " that name did not, in truth and in fact, stand for " the man from Stratford," but again for that same person —or it might be, and in certain cases certainly was, for some other—^who desired to publish plays under the mask of a convenient pen-name. And if the authorship of these poems and plays came, in course of time, to be attributed to William Shakspere, the player from Stratford-upon-Avon, who himself never uttered a word, or wrote a syllable, or took any steps whatever to claim the authorship of those poems and plays for himself, but was content " merely to play the part of *' William the Silent from first to last, there is, surely, no reason to brand him as a cheat and a '* fraud " upon that account, and we may be quite sure that that highly-gifted and distinguished man of literature, H^enry James one of the intellectuals of our day—had no intention of so branding him. A lady, a short time ago, wrote a book to explain the play of Hamlet in quite a new light, by making reference to the special political circumstances of the time when it appeared, such as the " Scottish succession," the character 8 INTRODUCTORY of James I, certain events in the lives of Mary Queen of Scots, Burleigh, Essex, Southampton, Elizabeth Vernon, and other historical figures, and producing " detailed analogies between episodes of contemporary history and the play,"* and, in reply to certain objections raised by a well-known critic, she essayed to justify herself by an appeal to the doctrine of " Relativity," which, as she declared with some warmth, had come to stay whether her captious critic wanted it or not ! This lofty invocation of Einstein's theory of Time, Space, and the Universe—a theory so difficult of comprehension that only a favoured few can even affect to understand it—in support of a new inter- pretation of one of Shakespeare's plays, was, certainly, somewhat ridiculous, but the lady was quite right in her contention—which would equally hold good though Einstein had never lived or taught —that in forming our judgments on men long gone, whether of their characters or their actions, or their sayings or their writings, we must ever bear in mind the views, the beliefs, the opinions, and the special circumstances of the time and the society in which they lived. Now, it is well known that in Elizabethan and Jacobean times opinion with regard to what I may call literary deception was very different from what it is at the present day when we at any rate affect much greater scrupulosity with regard to these matters. Such literary de- ceptions, which in these days would be condemned as " frauds," were, in those times, constantly * See Times Literary Supplement, June 2, 1921. Article headed " Hamlet and History." 9 — BACONIAN ESSAYS and habitually practised, and considered quite venial sins, if, indeed, they were looked upon as sins at all. That is a fact which should never be lost sight of when we are considering problems of authorship, or writings of dubious interpretation (such as some of Ben Jonson's, e.g.) in those long- gone and very different times. Now, I am one of those who agree with the late Mr. Henry James, and with the present highly- distinguished French scholar and historian, Professor Abel Lefranc—I refer here to his negative views only—with regard to the authorship of the plays and poems of '* Shakespeare." In my humble opinion (which, to be quite honest, I may say is not " " humble at all !), that the plays and poems of ** Shakespeare " were not written by William Shakspere, the player who came from Stratford, is as certain as anything can be which is not susceptible of actual mathematical proof. Who then wrote the plays ? (Let us leave the poems on one side for the present). Well, that the work of many pens appears in the Folio of 1623 i^ surely indisputable. Few if any, of the " orthodox " would be found to deny *' " it. There is little, if any, of Shakespeare whoever he was—in the first part of Henry VI, and, surely, not much more in the second and third parts. Very little, if any part, of The Taming of the Shrew is " Shakespearean." The great majority of critics exclude Titus altogether. The work of pens other than the Shakespearean pen is to be found in Pericles, and Timo7i, and T'roiliis and Cresssida, and even in Macbeth. Henry VHI, though published as by *' Shakespeare," was almost undoubtedly the 10 INTRODUCTORY work of Fletcher and Massinger in collaboration.* The list might be added to but it is unnecessary to do so. I repeat, the work of many pens is to be found in the Folio of 1623, but there is, of course, one man whose work eclipses that of all the rest, one man who stands pre-eminent and unrivalled, towering high above the others ; one man of whom it may be said, as of Marcellus of old, that insignis ingreditiir^ victorque vivos supereminet omnes. Find that man, find the author of Hamlet, and Lear, and Othello—to give but a few examples—and you will have found the true " Shakespeare." But set your hearts at rest you will never find him in the man ; whose vulgar and banal life (in the course of which not one— I do not say generous but—even respect- able action can be discovered by all the researches of his biographers) is to be read in the pages of Halliwell-Phillipps and Sir Sidney Lee—the life of which so little is known, and yet so much too much ! Meantime it is amusing, or would be so if it were not so lamentable, to see our solemn and entirely self-satisfied Pundits and Mandarins of " Shake- spearean " literature ever trying to see daylight through the millstone of the Stratfordian faith ; ever broaching some brand-new theory, and affecting to find something in this Shakespearean literature which nobody ever found before them, but which as they fondly imagine, somehow, and in some way, tends to support the old outworn Stratfordian tradition. Perhaps some *' prompt copy " of an * See Sidelights on Shakespeare by H. Dugdale Sykes. (The Shake- speare Head Press, Stratford-upon-Avon. 1919.) 11 — BACONIAN ESSAYS old Elizabethan drama is discovered. It is hailed with exultation as affording proof that plays in those times were printed from *' prompt copies," and further cryptic arguments are adduced in support of the absurd theory that the Stratford player dashed off the plays of " Shakespeare," currente calamo^ and handed them over to his fellow ** deserving men," Heminge and Condell, and the rest, with " scarse a blot " upon them, and that the plays were printed from these precious " unblotted autographs." An old Manuscript Play is found. It is the work of several pens. In it are discovered three pages in " an unknown hand. See now ! Here is a hand of the same class " as the " Shakespeare " (i.e., ** Shakspere ") signatures ! Why, it is Shakspere's own handwriting ! Look at Shakspere's will—the will in which no book or manuscript is mentioned, but wherein are small bequests to Shakspere's fellow-players, those " deserving men " Burbage, and Heminge, and Condell, to buy them rings withal, and of the testator's sword, and parcel-gilt bowl, and " second-best bedstead "—and there you will find three words well
Recommended publications
  • Francis Bacon: of Law, Science, and Philosophy Laurel Davis Boston College Law School, [email protected]
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Rare Book Room Exhibition Programs Daniel R. Coquillette Rare Book Room Fall 9-1-2013 Francis Bacon: Of Law, Science, and Philosophy Laurel Davis Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/rbr_exhibit_programs Part of the Archival Science Commons, European History Commons, and the Legal History Commons Digital Commons Citation Davis, Laurel, "Francis Bacon: Of Law, Science, and Philosophy" (2013). Rare Book Room Exhibition Programs. Paper 20. http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/rbr_exhibit_programs/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Daniel R. Coquillette Rare Book Room at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rare Book Room Exhibition Programs by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Francis Bacon: Of Law, Science, and Philosophy Boston College Law Library Daniel R. Coquillette Rare Book Room Fall 2013 This exhibit was curated by Laurel Davis and features a selection of books from a beautiful and generous gift to us from J. Donald Monan Professor of Law Daniel R. Coquillette The catalog cover was created by Lily Olson, Law Library Assistant, from the frontispiece portrait in Bacon’s Of the Advancement and Proficiencie of Learn- ing: Or the Partitions of Sciences Nine Books. London: Printed for Thomas Williams at the Golden Ball in Osier Lane, 1674. The caption of the original image gives Bacon’s official title and states that he died in April 1626 at age 66.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Building, Essay 45, Aus: FRANCIS BACON, the Essayes Or Counsels
    FRANCIS BACON : Of Building , Essay 45, aus: FRANCIS BACON , The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, of Francis Lo. Verulam, Viscount St. Alban (London: Printed by Iohn Haviland for Hanna Barret, 1625) herausgegeben und eingeleitet von CHARLES DAVIS FONTES 16 [1. Oktober 2008] Zitierfähige URL: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/volltexte/2008/609 [Francis Bacon] THE E S S A Y E S OR C O V N S E L S, C I V I L L A N D M O R A L L, OF FRANCIS LO. VERVLAM, VISCOVNT S t. ALBAM. __________________________ Newly written . __________________________ __________________________ LONDON, Printed by I O H N H A V I L A N D, for H A N N A B A R R E T . 1625. Essay XLV. Of Building. , pp. 257-265 FONTES 16 1 Anon., Francis Bacon, Baron Verulam, Viscount St. Albans, engraving 2 CONTENTS 4 OUTLINE AND STRUCTURE of FRANCIS BACON’s Of Building 10 INTRODUCTION . “ A HOUSE IS TO LIVE IN, NOT TO LOOK AT ”: FRANCIS BACON’S ESSAY “OF BUILDING ”, 1625 13 ANTHOLOGY OF COMMENTARIES TO BACON’S Of Building 18 THE TEXT OF BACON’S Of Building 21 GLOSSARY OF BACON’S Of Building 26 ARCHITECTURAL PUBLICATIONS IN ENGLISH UNTIL 1625 28 BIOGRAPHY OF FRANCIS BACON 29 FRANCIS BACON: Bio-Bibliography 30 THE NEW ATLANTIS 32 THE DEDICATION OF THE “Newly written ” Essays to the Duke of Buckingham 34 LITERATURE ABOUT FRANCIS BACON 36 APPENDIX ONE: OF PLANTATIONS 38 APPENDIX TWO: OF BEAUTY 39 ‘NOTABLE THINGS’: Words, themes, topics, names, places in Of Building 3 OUTLINE and STRUCTURE of FRANCIS BACON’S Of Building Francis Bacon’s essay, Of Building , can perhaps be understood most directly by first examining its form and content synoptically.
    [Show full text]
  • Salvation Through Science? Bacon's New Atlantis and Transhumanism
    Salvation Through Science? Bacon’s New Atlantis and Transhumanism David N. Whitney Nicholls State University The interplay between politics and science is certainly not a new phenomenon, but astonishing scientific advances in medicine and technology during the 20th century, and into the first two decades of the 21st, have forced us to reconsider that relationship. While those advances have led to unprecedented wealth and accumulation of material comforts, man’s increased control over nature also means he can destroy his fellow man with greater ease. Thus, in addition to penicillin, vaccinations for crippling diseases such as polio and smallpox, the mass production of the automobile, television, the internet and countless other beneficial inventions, the 20th century saw tens of millions die at the hands of their own governments.1 Atomic energy can provide power for a whole city, but the same technology can also be used to decimate that very city. Natural science gives us incredible power, but it does not provide any guidelines as to how that power should be used. Therefore, a series of questions must be raised as to the proper relationship between science and politics. Should governments control scientific research agendas? Should they determine what inventions to allow? And if so, how can such determinations be made? Who ultimately decides if a scientific advancement is good or bad for society? The answers to such questions go a long way in determining the role of science within a society. 1 R. J. Rummel has coined the term “democide” to refer to the Killing of citizens by their own governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Past the Pillars of Hercules: Francis Bacon and the Science of Rulemaking Daniel R
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 6-1-2012 Past the Pillars of Hercules: Francis Bacon and the Science of Rulemaking Daniel R. Coquillette Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Common Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, European Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Legal History, Theory and Process Commons Recommended Citation Daniel R. Coquillette. "Past the Pillars of Hercules: Francis Bacon and the Science of Rulemaking." University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 46, no.2 (2012): 549-592. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 33129-mre_46-2 Sheet No. 106 Side A 03/21/2013 10:43:50 \\jciprod01\productn\M\MRE\46-2\MRE207.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-MAR-13 12:07 PAST THE PILLARS OF HERCULES: FRANCIS BACON AND THE SCIENCE OF RULEMAKING* Daniel R. Coquillette** 33129-mre_46-2 Sheet No. 106 Side A 03/21/2013 10:43:50 Title page of Bacon’s Novum Organum (1620) * “[S]ailing past the Pillars of Hercules and ignoring the ancient warnings ‘non ultra!’” DANIEL R. COQUILLETTE, FRANCIS BACON 258 (William Twining & Neil MacCormick eds., 1992). The above frontispiece of Francis Bacon’s NOVUM ORGANUM (1620) (from GIBSON, infra note 1, at 87) shows the Pillars of Hercules and a small, brave ship passing beyond them.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Bacon Write Shakespeare?
    XTbe ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE S)ei(>oteb to tbe Science of 'Relidlon, tbe IRelidion of Science, anb tbe Bxtension of tbe Itelidiottd parliament Idea Founded by Edward C. Hegeler. VOL. XXX. (No. 4) APRIL, 1916. NO. 719 CONTENTS: FACI Frontispiece. William Shakespeare, Country Gentleman (After a Portrait by Adolph Menzel). Did Bacon Write Shakespeare f (Illustrated). George Seibel 193 The Attitude of America. Roland Hugins. The German-Americans 222 The American View 226 The Anglomaniacs . 231 Conclusion 236 The Money Market of To-Morrow. Lindley M. Keasbey 241 Mr. Gorham Replies to Mr. Mattern 254 Woe ®pen Court IPublisbfitd Company CHICAGO Per copy, 10 cents (sixpence). Yearly, $1.00 (in the U.P.U., 5s. 6d.). Entered as Second-Class Matter March 26, 1897, at the Post Office at Chicago, 111., under Act of March 3, 1879 Copyright by The Open Court Publishing Company, igi6 ^be ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE S)evote^ to tbe Science ot 'Relidion, tbe tReligion of Science, anb tbe Bxtension ot tbe "Kelidiottd parliament IDea Founded by Edward C. Hegelss. VOL. XXX. (No. 4) APRIL, 1916. NO. 719 CONTENTS: rxci Frontispiece. William Shakespeare, Country Gentleman (After a Portrait by Adolph Menzel). Did Bacon Write Shakespeare f (Illustrated). George Seibel 193 The Attitude of America. Roland Hugins. The German-Americans 222 The American View 226 The Anglomaniacs 231 Conclusion 236 The Money Market of To-Morrow. Lindley AL Keasbey 241 Mr. Gorham Replies to Mr. Mattern 254 ^e ®pen Court IPublisbiitd Company CHICAGO Per copy, 10 cents (sixpence). Yearly, $1.00 (in the U.P.U., 5s.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbal Usury in the Merchant of Venice
    VERBAL USURY IN THE MERCHANT OF VENICE SOONAFTER the vernacular grail tales first appeared in Europe, new financial institutions began to challenge the theories ofproduction and representation by which the tales were informed. Fiduciary means dis- turbingly similar to the Christian cornucopia that is the grail affected more and more the livelihood and thinking of impoverished aristocrats and merchants. The topos of the roi-pecheur (sinnerlfisher king) was displaced by the Venetian "merchant prince." This "royal merchant,"' both landed aristocrat and moneyed trader, sought the golden fleece with marine fleets supported by interest loans and insurance.' The divine store generated gratis from the Holy Grail was replaced concep- tually by the natural store of alien shores, whose wealth had to be hus- banded or exploited by expensive means. The problems of divine economy and of the difference between producer and product came to be considered in terms of nature and the tension between natural and unnatural representation and exchange. I. William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, ed. Brents Stirling (Baltimore, 1973)~3. 2. 239. References are to act, scene, and line. The English "royal merchant" made his appearance in economic history much later than the merchant prince of Venice. Samuel Johnson (Johnson, ed., Plays of Shakespeare [London, 17651) notes that "this epithet ["merchant prince"] was, in our poet's time, more striking and more readily understood, because [Sir Thomas] Gresham was then commonly dignified with the title of the royal merchant." 2. E. D. Pettet, "The Merchant of Venice and the Problem of Usury," Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association 31 (1945): 19, notes that "by the time Shakespeare was writing his plays the feudal aristocracy had come to feel the full pinch of the century's momentous economic developments" and that "there was only one way out-the usurer." In Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus (1604), America is the "golden fleece" (Doctor Faustus, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacon's Essays and Wisdom of the Ancients;
    Digitized by tine Internet Arcliive in 2007 witli funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.arcliive.org/details/baconsessayswisdOObacoiala BACON'S ESSAYS WISDOM OF THE AK"CIEFTS WITH A BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE BY A. SPIERS PREFACE BY B. MONTAGU, AND NOTES BY DIFFERENT WRITERS BOSTON LITTLE, BROWK, AND COMPANY Copyright, 188^ By Little, Bhown, and Company. Xhk UioTEBsmr Pbbss, Cambbioob, Mass., 0. S. A. SRLE URL c,cl 1^-?3S86 ADVERTISEMENT. In preparing the present volume for the press, use has been freely made of several publications which have recentl}- appeared in England. The Biographical Notice of the author is taken from an edition of the Essays, by A. Spiers, Ph. D. To this has been added the Preface to Pickering's edition of the Essays and Wisdom of the Ancients, by Basil Montagu, Esq. Parker's edition, by Thomas Markbj-, M. A., has furnished the arrangement of the Table prefixed to the Essays, and also "the references to the most important quotations." The Notes, including the translations of the Latin, are chiefly copied from Bohn's edition, prepared by Joseph Devey, M. A. We have given the modern translation of the Wisdom of the Ancients contained in Bohn's edition, in preference to that " done by Sir Arthur Gorges," although the last mentioned has a claim upon regard, as having been made by a contemporary of Lord Bacon, and published in his lifetime. Its language is in the style of English current in the author's age, and for this reason may resemble more nearly what the phil- osopher himself would have used, had he composed the work in his own tongue instead of Latin.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Bacon: an Alchemical Odyssey Through the Novum Organum
    Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 28, Number 2 (2003) 65 FRANCIS BACON: AN ALCHEMICAL ODYSSEY THROUGH THE NOVUM ORGANUM Pedro Cintas, University of Extremadura, Spain One of the most fascinating and thought-provoking practices, although they did not waste their effort and periods in the history of chemistry is the coexistence in money in pursuit of the philosopher’s stone and other Western Europe of the ancient alchemy (having most alchemists’ dreams. Among these natural philosophers, likely arisen from Hellenistic and Arabic influences) the figure of Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) should and the rational, scientific chemistry we know today. chiefly be mentioned. Bacon is best known as a phi- By its own nature, this is a rather indeterminate period losopher of science and a master of the English tongue ranging from the Renaissance (around the 15th and 16th (5). In the former case, many of his writings were con- centuries) to early in the 19th century when chemical cerned with the natural sciences and the theory of sci- gold making–transmutation–was conclusively refuted entific method, which he considered incomplete and tak- by scientific evidence. Although the origin of alchemy ing little account of observation while giving too much is uncertain, it had a double aspect: on the one hand it credit to tradition and authority. He had an acute power was a practical endeavor aimed to make gold or silver of observation and advocated the repetition of experi- from ordinary and abundant metals such as lead or cop- ments as a means to verify hypotheses, rather than to per, whereas on the other it was a cosmological theory consider the latter ones as if they were incorrigible axi- based on the interaction between man and the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Books Will Speak Plain'? Colonialism, Jewishness and Politics in Bacon's New Atlantis
    Colonialism, Jewishness and politics 129 7 ‘Books will speak plain’? Colonialism, Jewishness and politics in Bacon’s New Atlantis CLAIRE JOWITT Francis Bacon’s Of Counsel (1625) asserts that ‘Books will speak plain when counsellors blanch.’1 In other words, a counsellor – even one like Bacon, languishing on the margins of political favour – will find it easier to offer advice to his prince through the medium of the written word. A counsellor can give better advice away from the intimidating presence of his monarch. Bacon’s statement in Of Counsel provides a useful way of reading some of the complexities of the New Atlantis. It suggests that this scientific utopia might be seen as advice literature directed towards the Stuart monarchy. Bacon’s earlier works promoting England’s scientific future, such as The Advancement of Learning (1605) and Novum Organum (1620), had, superficially at least, been approved by James I. For example, while Bacon’s dedication to James in The Advancement of Learning modestly states ‘that though I cannot positively or affirmatively advise your Majesty’, it nevertheless asserts that ‘I may excite your princely cogitations … to extract particulars for this purpose [the advance- ment of learning] agreeable to your magnanimity and wisdom’.2 Even though James may have ignored Bacon’s scientific schemes, he certainly promoted him within governmental hierarchies. Consequently, it appears that the New Atlantis could ‘speak plain’ since it was merely an imaginative continuation of the scientific programme Bacon had previously outlined in theory. Claire Jowitt - 9781526137388 Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/28/2021 05:00:58AM via free access Price_07_Ch7 129 14/10/02, 9:45 am 130 Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis However, given Bacon’s precarious position after his impeach- ment, his ability to ‘speak plain’ should be seen as more equi- vocal and complex than reading the New Atlantis simply as advice to princes would imply.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSAY 1 Bacon's “Serious Satire” of the Church And
    ESSAY 1 Bacon’s “Serious Satire” of the Church and the “Golden Mediocrity” of Induction Kenneth Alan Hovey University of Texas at San Antonio It is as a reformer of natural philosophy rather than of the church that Francis Bacon is best known, and for good reason. From 1605 on he devoted the bulk of his published writings to the promotion of “the new philosophy.” In the quasi-satiric Advancement of Learning (1605) he surveyed all knowledge to reveal how barren the old philosophy was and how much men did not know. Then in the Novum Organum (1620) he sought to replace the old philosophy in its two contemporary forms, the all-too-theoretical Scholasticism and the too randomly empiri- cal alchemy, with the dynamic via media of empirical yet theo- retical induction, a scientific method that would systematically increase human knowledge and render philosophy fruitful. Continuing to his death in 1626 to add to his plan of scientific reform, dubbed the Instauratio Magna, he succeeded in attract- ing a large and growing following, beginning with James I. But prior to 1605 he had devoted himself largely to the reform of the Church of England. In two major treatises and a number of official papers and other works, all written from 1589 to 1604, and reflecting Elizabethan rather than Jacobean conditions, he satirized the chief opposing parties within the British church, the Puritans and the prelates, and proposed re- forms by which they could be reconciled. The two treatises, which circulated in manuscript, received no official support from Elizabeth or James, and Bacon’s proposed reform of the church proved as much of a failure as his reform of philosophy proved a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Bensalem's Legal System by Francis Bacon (New Atlantis) and James I
    VI Bensalem’s Legal System by Francis Bacon (New Atlantis) and James I (True Law): Representations of God, kingship, knowledge and peace. ANDRES FONT GALARZA This paper compares Bensalem's legal system in Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis with James I’s True Law tract. Whilst differing in form – fiction and political tract – both artefacts unite in their belief that the people should be ruled by an enlightened, absolutist, legal framework. In addition, this paper also analyses a Simon de Passe engraving that, echoing the aforementioned works, represents an early seventeenth-century Jacobean Britain, marked by royal absolutism, which was justified by God’s delegation of earthly authority to the king. Yet, this absolutism was moderated by a search for knowledge and peace. rancis Bacon wrote New Atlantis, a utopian moral and scientific tale, around 1624.1 This F period was at the end of Bacon’s life and career as a philosopher and politician.2 Bacon was appointed to high legal positions by James I of England and VI of Scotland. New Atlantis tells the story of Bensalem, a happy island inhabited by an old civilisation of chaste, peaceful and obedient people ruled by a monarch and an elite of sages. The people of Bensalem would become Christians shortly after the death of Jesus.3 Remarkably, knowledge is the basis of welfare of Bensalem, whose rulers would guide the population in the management of such knowledge. Bensalemites acquired knowledge 1 Francis Bacon, ‘New Atlantis’ in New Atlantis and The Great Instauration, ed. by Jerry Weinberger (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2017), p.
    [Show full text]
  • !"', I, Attic Prose: Lipsius, Montaigne, Bacon
    ("',, ' '- '-'<""4 , .....'1....:.) ~. !"', I, MORRIS W. CROLL Attic Prose: Lipsius, Montaigne, Bacon Monta;gllC . 1'HE FOUNDEn OF LlDERTINB STYLE There is n striking similarity between the moral experience of l'vlon~ taigne at the time of his retirement and that through which Lipsius passed more gradually in arriving at the ultimate form ofhis thought, He too was touched with the melancholy of the late Renaissance. His confessed aim in his retirement was to study it and come to terms with it; and the method of his study in the first phase of his philo­ sophical development was purely Stoic. The essays which we can prove to have been written during the first five or six years after his retirement arc as lil<e in tone and spirit to the Stoical treatises of Lipsius as the writings of two authors working independently are ever likely to be. The essa)' on Solitude, for instance, is a kind of companion-piece or complement to Lipsius' dialogue on COllstalley. Rhetorically, too, Montaigne effected his escape from humanistic orthodoxy through the Stoic doorway; and he asserted his freedom with more boldness and promptitude, perhaps actually became can' scious of it at an earlier date, than Lipsius, He is in no doubt, even in the earliest of his Essays, about his distaste for Cicero's style; and Flom TIle Sc11eZliHg AmJiversary Papers by His Former Students, pp. II7· 1;0. Copyright 1923 by Appleton-Century.Crofts, Division of The: Meredith I Corporation. i } 3 4 1\10nmS W. CHOU. :\'n'(f': rltose: I,TPSllIS, MONTArcNl\, BACON 5 indeed is ,ill: ollly i\llli-Circroni:lIl who d:lf(.'s 10 express his ·illlk~­ his writings more familiar 10 the world than those of Murct "IllI P('lHlt:lll't~ ' ...
    [Show full text]