DOCSLIB.ORG

The Price of Greatness: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and the Creation of American Oligarchy'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Price of Greatness: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and the Creation of American Oligarchy' H-FedHist Brannon on Cost, 'The Price of Greatness: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and the Creation of American Oligarchy' Review published on Tuesday, August 31, 2021 Jay Cost. The Price of Greatness: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and the Creation of American Oligarchy. New York: Basic Books, 2018. 256 pp. $27.00 (paper),ISBN 978-1-5416-9746-1. Reviewed by Rebecca Brannon (James Madison University) Published on H-FedHist (August, 2021) Commissioned by Caryn E. Neumann (Miami University of Ohio Regionals) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53686 The Price of Greatness is a tightly written (short) book that takes on a difficult subject. As Jay Cost notes in the introduction, James Madison’s evolution over time from an advocate of greater federal power to an avowed opponent of projects of federal strength is either mystifying or hypocritical, depending on your perspective. Cost argues that Madison’s progression from Federalist and ally of Alexander Hamilton to staunch opponent of centralized fiscal power was motivated by his concerns for ensuring all people equal access to and benefit from their government. All along his concern for checks and balances was part of a system determined to stymie government capture. Jay Cost is a conservative pundit and writer who left the Republican Party in 2016 over the nomination of Donald J. Trump for president. This work tries to understand how on earth we came to this moment in American politics and life. When the book came out in 2018, it clearly attempted to explain how the tensions existent in the American democratic experiment from the very beginning have only inflated since the founding moment. Cost paints a path from the fight over oligarchy in the eighteenth century to the moment that brought seemingly improbable pseudo-populist leader Trump to the highest office in the most powerful country in the world. The events since then, including the occupation of the Capitol in January 2021, have only made these questions more urgent. Perhaps the founders did not have wonderful solutions to the inherent tensions between the needs of the people and the lure of federal power for elite self-protection. Perhaps only luck kept us from always being a very stratified and unequal society rather than Thomas Jefferson’s imagined middle-class farmers’ republic. After all, viewed in hindsight, eras of extreme income inequality have been at least as frequent as eras of muted inequality and a “middle-class” America. This book comes at a moment when early American historians are joining a wider scholarly community concerned with extreme income inequality. Scholars such as Daniel Mandell and Terry Bouton have delved into the myriad ways in which early Americans pushed for economic equality and a fundamentally middle-class, owner society for white men. [1] Most early Americans did not want a winner-take-all society. Furthermore, they saw it as incompatible with their vision of a participatory democracy. Early Americans were suspicious of not just monarchy but also concentrated financial power. Early Americans followed a long line of early modern English and German thinkers who Citation: H-Net Reviews. Brannon on Cost, 'The Price of Greatness: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and the Creation of American Oligarchy'. H-FedHist. 08-31-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/5299/reviews/8174522/brannon-cost-price-greatness-alexander-hamilton-james-madison-and Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-FedHist considered elite wealth concentration a great threat to the rights of all. With great wealth—or the possibility of great wealth—came elite power determined to advantage the few at the expense of the many. For many of these people, the American Revolution was a revolution in favor of human, or at least white male, equality. They fought in order to bring a more equal society into being. Pennsylvanians, long known for living in the best poor man’s country, wrote a revolutionary-era constitution that epitomized the movement. Power was placed in a unicameral legislature to best represent the people. There was no upper house to “contain” the lower sorts or protect elite interests. Democracy required income equality to work. Otherwise, the elite would hoard opportunity for themselves at the expense of both everyone else and the health of the democratic government itself. Desperate times lead to desperate intellectual measures. Jay Cost has emerged from a conservatism that promotes not just free markets but market absolutism to rediscover a long-standing, home-grown skepticism of elites and their capture of market opportunities through coercive control of the mechanisms of power. The title of the book frames the real question—how did we end up with an oligarchy instead of a thriving democracy? Is this an inevitable cost? Cost chooses to consider two allies and frenemies who co-wrote theFederalist Papers and thereby shaped a powerful vision of a strong federal government—only to diverge in the following decades. In so doing, Cost tries to move beyond the idea that the prominent founding fathers were opposed to the most egalitarian impulses of the Revolution in order to bring them into the conversation about the value, and limits, of economic equality. In so doing, he has to grapple with the reality that many of the early national elite were indeed galvanized by the chance to use their control of government to line their own pockets. He quotes a senator from Pennsylvania who resented this devolution from the ideals of the Revolutionary moment. The Constitution “raised a singular ferment.… Every one ill at ease in his finances; everyone out at elbows in his circumstances; every ambitious man, every one desirous of a shortcut to wealth and honors.” And everyone saw how the Constitution could “be wrought to their purposes,” with chances at government sinecures of all kinds (pp. 75-76). Cost shows how James Madison was alarmed by real-life examples of government capture, including speculators (including almost all of Congress) voting for the government to pay back debt at full face value once they had snapped it up for shillings on the pound. He was further alarmed by the financial panic of 1792, which was caused by emboldened speculators trading on inside information to try to corner the market on public securities. Investors felt no moral hazard as long as they controlled the public purse. Why not individualize the profits and nationalize the losses? Hamilton ended up bailing out emboldened, and connected, speculators with government money. As Cost shows, “the moneyed class acquired effective control over the government, directing public affairs for its own ends rather than the good of all” (p. 75). It had taken less than five years from the adoption of the Constitution to the possibility of ruinous government capture. If this sounds all too familiar, consider that the point of this trade press book is to speak to where we are today. Cost’s dilemma is what he sees as Madison’s—what to do when you support strong federal government, but see it as fully captured by oligarchy? Madison famously invoked the realization that men are no angels in theFederalist Papers. In Cost’s hands, Madison’s naivete led him to be continually surprised and alarmed as things did not work out in his favor. Yet was Madison ever really thus? He mistrusted abuses of the government, but he also mistrusted financiers in general. His own wealth came from landownership and the exploitation of the enslaved. Of course he saw his Citation: H-Net Reviews. Brannon on Cost, 'The Price of Greatness: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and the Creation of American Oligarchy'. H-FedHist. 08-31-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/5299/reviews/8174522/brannon-cost-price-greatness-alexander-hamilton-james-madison-and Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-FedHist interests as diverging from Hamilton’s commercial and industrial vision. Cost is a careful scholar who struggles in assessing how far to carry his own concerns about market concentration and market capture then and now. One notable absence is any use of or reflection on the new history of capitalism. This line of thought argues that slavery, not free labor, was crucial to the development of America’s financial and industrial might. Scholars such as Caitlin Rosenthal and Edward Baptist have shown how integral slavery was to the development of modern American capitalism.[2] Cost also is torn about giving up modern conservatism’s belief that Hamilton’s vision of a market-oriented, commercial, industrial America was the right and inevitable one. He therefore admires Madison’s insights into the limitations of our government structure but also keeps repeating that he was ultimately wrong about the nation’s direction. I am not sure you can have both. Then there is the problem of Madison’s presidency, which historians usually handle by ignoring it ever happened. Cost argues that Madison certainly made mistakes but in response generated a new Democratic-Republican theory of government that merged republicanism and liberalism. Cost believes that what he calls the Federalist-Republican fusion worked reasonably well, but the tension between risks of either oligarchy or a mob rule of united factions remained. He briefly traces the nineteenth- and twentieth-century history of the 1 percent bribing politicians for their own interests. Government capture is reality. Cost’s real concerns are apparent in his language along the way. He writes of a Republican Party as “an ideologically adrift coalition at the end of the war, desperately in need of a new direction” (p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Federalist Era Lesson 1 the First President
    NAME _____________________________________________ DATE __________________ CLASS ____________ The Federalist Era Lesson 1 The First President ESSENTIAL QUESTION Terms to Know precedent something done or said that becomes What are the characteristics of an example for others to follow a leader? cabinet a group of advisers to a president bond certificate that promises to repay borrowed GUIDING QUESTIONS money in the future—plus an additional amount of 1. What decisions did Washington and the new money, called interest Congress have to make about the new government? 2. How did the economy develop under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton? Where in the world? P o t o m MARYLAND a c R . WASHINGTON, D.C. White U.S. Supreme House Court U.S. Capitol VIRGINIA N c a W E m o t o S P Notes: per the screenshot of the map as placed in pages, the size of the map has been changed from 39p6 to 25p6, and labelsWhen resized todid comply it with happen? the approved styles DOPA (Discovering our Past - American History) 1780 1785 1790 1795 1800 RESG Chapter 08 George Washington 1789–1797 John Adams 1797–1801 Map Title: The Nation’s Capital File Name: C8_RESG_L2_01A_B.ai Map Size: 25p6 wide x 23p0 deep 1789 Washington 1800 Congress Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission 1795 Nation’s first chief Date/Proof: March 3, 2011 - 5th Proof 1791 Bill of Rights 2016 Font Update: February 20, 2015 becomes first justice, John Jay, retires meets in Capitol for president, Judiciary added to Constitution from Supreme Court first time Act passes You Are Here in 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts History pass, XYZ affair 113 NAME _____________________________________________ DATE __________________ CLASS ____________ The Federalist Era Lesson 1 The First President, Continued Washington Takes Office George Washington was the first president of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Revolution Chapter 6 99
    APTE CH R NGSSS SS.8.A.3.3 Recognize the contributions THE AMERICAN of the Founding Fathers (John Adams, Sam Adams, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, Alexander 6 Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, James REVOLUTION Madison, George Mason, George Washington) during American Revolutionary efforts. ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop? The Revolutionary War was not George Washington’s first “The time is now near at hand time going into battle. During the French and Indian War, which must probably determine two horses were shot out from under him. He knew his whether Americans are to be troops would need to be brave. freemen or slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own…The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. GENERAL ORDERS,” 2 JULY 1776, IN J. C. FITZPATRICK ED. WRITINGS OF PHOTO: PHOTO: SuperStock/Getty Images GEORGE WASHINGTON VOL. 5 1932 [INSERT ART C00_000P_00000] fate of unborn millions What was Washington trying to say about the action of his men by using this phrase? In this speech, Washington was addressing the Continental Army. What do you think Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. was the purpose of his speech? DBQ BREAKING IT DOWN George Washington chose the words of his speech carefully. Imagine that you are an American general writing to inspire troops to go into battle today. What words would you use to make your troops feel inspired? In the space, write your own speech. netw rksTM There’s More Online! The American Revolution Chapter 6 99 099_120_DOPA_WB_C06_661734.indd 99 3/30/11 3:34 PM NGSSS SS.8.A.3.3 Recognize the ON contributions of the Founding S Fathers (John Adams, Sam Adams, S E Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, L THE WAR FOR Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Mason, George Washington) during American INDEPENDENCE Revolutionary efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Knox and the Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy
    Henry Knox and the Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy Stephen J. Rockwell As the Officer who is at the head of that [War] department is a branch of the Executive, and called to its Councils upon interesting questions of National importance[,] he ought to be a man, not only of competent skill in the science of War, but possessing a general knowledge of political subjects, of known attachment to the Government we have chosen, and of proved integrity. 1 So wrote President George Washington to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney in January 1794. Washington was expecting the resignation of his trusted former artillery commander and longtime secretary of war, Henry Knox, who had shepherded the War Department through the Confederation government, across the gap between the Confederation and government under the Constitution, and through tense negotiations and major military Secretary of War Henry Knox losses with Indian nations in the South and the Old Northwest. In writing to Pinckney, Washington emphasized how complex the job of a department head had become, just a few years into the new government. The successful department head required policy expertise, political acumen, general wisdom, networked loyalty to the government and its other officials, and personal integrity. Stephen J. Rockwell is a professor of Political Science at St. Joseph’s College, Patchogue, New York. This essay is based on a paper given at the annual conference of the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic, Philadelphia, PA, July 2017. He wishes to thank Lindsay Chervinsky, Joanne Freeman, Gautham Rao, Kate Brown, Jerry Landry, and Benjamin Guterman for their questions, comments, and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue Upcoming Events Alexander Hamilton
    Vol 4 Issue 4 Official Publication of the Alexander Hamilton Chapter, WA, Sons of the American Revolution Apr 2018 Volume IV, Issue IV (April 2018) Official Publication of the WA State, Alexander Hamilton Chapter Sons of the American Revolution Editor: dick motz In This Issue Upcoming Events Alexander Hamilton ....................................................... 2 Revolutionary War Battles in the month of January ......... 2 Revolutionary War Quiz .................................................. 2 What is the SAR? ............................................................. 3 Message from the Vice President ..................................... 4 A Problem & a Solution ................................................... 4 5 May: WSSDAR Annual Conference, SAR Booth. Thoughts from the CG Commander .................................. 5 Location: SeaTac Red Lion Hotel (all hands invited) March Birthdays .............................................................. 5 7 May: DAR Rededication of Robert Gray Marker (4 Meeting News ................................................................. 6 CG + 1 Drummer) State Meeting Highlights ................................................. 7 Location: Ocean Shores, Coastal Interpretive Wanted/For Sale ............................................................. 10 Center, 1033 Catala Ave. S.E., 1pm Map link Special Dates in Apr 19 May: Next Chapter Meeting, Johnny’s at Fife, 9:00 AM. 1 Apr ........................... April Fool’s day 19 May: Armed Forces Day Parade, need 5 color 1 Apr ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Title: Hamilton's
    Lesson Title: Hamilton’s War Grade Levels : 9-12 Time Allotment: Three 45-minute class periods Overview: This high school lesson plan uses video clips from REDISCOVERING ALEXANDER HAMILTON and a website featuring interactive animations of Revolutionary War battles to explore Alexander Hamilton’s military career in three different engagements: The Battle for New York The Battle of Princeton, and the Siege of Yorktown. The Introductory Activity dispels the common misconception that the Revolution was primarily fought by “minutemen” militiamen using guerilla tactics against the British, and establishes the primary role of the Continental Army in the American war effort. The Learning Activities uses student organizers to focus students’ online exploration of the battles of New York, Princeton, and Yorktown, focusing on Alexander Hamilton’s role. The Culminating Activity challenges students to create their own organizer for a different Revolutionary War battle. This lesson is best used during a unit on the American Revolution, after the key causes for the conflict have been established. Subject Matter: History Learning Objectives: Students will be able to: • Distinguish between “irregular” and “regular” military forces in the 18 th century and outline their relative merits • Explain the context and consequences for the battles of New York, Princeton, and Yorktown • Describe the general course of events in each of these actions, noting key turning points • Discuss how historical fact can sometimes be distorted or embellished for effect • Outline
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Musical “Hamilton” Shanedra Nowell, Oklahoma
    The Ten-Dollar Founding Father & The American Revolution: Lessons from the musical “Hamilton” Shanedra Nowell, Oklahoma State University ([email protected]) & Lauren ​ ​ Reddout, Edmond Sequoyah Middle School ([email protected]) ​ ​ Resources Websites: https://oeta.pbslearningmedia.org/collection/hamiltons-america/#.WcKUqciGPIU http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/hamiltons-america/ https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/hamilton http://www.slj.com/2016/05/resources/teaching-with-hamilton/#_ http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/19/hamilton-biggest-thing-broadway-being-taug ht-classrooms-all-over-424212.html http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/2016/02/15/the-best-teachinglearning-resources-on-t he-musical-hamilton/ http://www.mountvernon.org/education/educational-resources-and-hamilton/ (sources for each song) https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/24/the-ten-dollar-founding-father-witho ut-a-father-teaching-and-learning-with-hamilton/?mcubz=0 (primary sources also ​ paired with songs) https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/04/education/edlife/high-school-hami lton-quiz.html?mcubz=0 https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/hamilton/memory.html (Library of Congress ​ Alexander Hamilton collection of primary sources) Yorktown- Nathional Park Service https://www.nps.gov/york/index.htm & ​ ​ https://www.nps.gov/york/learn/historyculture/hamiltonbio.htm Videos: Top 10 Best Hamilton Songs: https://youtu.be/bhwv5-tFUJM ​ The Rap on 'Hamilton': American History Meets Hip Hop: https://youtu.be/zh8rIcRoMp8 Rapping, deconstructed:
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Quotes from Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, George Mason and Patrick Henry
    Educational materials were developed through the Teaching American History in Baltimore City Program, a partnership between the Baltimore City Public School System and the Center for History Education at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Resource Sheet #6 Direct Quotes from Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, George Mason and Patrick Henry Patrick Henry June, 1788 from a speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention 1. That this is a consolidated Government is demonstrably clear, and the danger of such a Government, is, to my mind, very striking. 2. I need not take much pains to show, that the principles of this system, are extremely dangerous. 3. Here is a revolution as radical as that which separated us from Great Britain. It is as radical, if in this transition our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the States be relinquished: And cannot we plainly see, that this is the case? 4. The English Government is founded on Self­love. This powerful irresistible stimulus of self­love has saved that government… Where is the rock of your salvation? The real rock of political salvation is self­love perpetuated from age to age in every human breast, and manifested in every action. If they can stand the temptations of human nature, you are safe. If you have a good President, Senators and Representatives, there is no danger. – But can this be expected from human nature? A good President, or Senator, or Representative, will have a natural weakness.­ Virtue will slumber. The wicked will be continually watching: Consequently, you will be undone. Reprinted with Permission from Chicago University Press http://press­pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch8s38.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Decimation, Rejuvenation, Motivation: How Disease and Murder Set the Stage at Saratoga
    University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive History Honors College 12-2015 Decimation, Rejuvenation, Motivation: How Disease and Murder Set the Stage at Saratoga Nicolas Soto University at Albany, State University of New York Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_history Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Soto, Nicolas, "Decimation, Rejuvenation, Motivation: How Disease and Murder Set the Stage at Saratoga" (2015). History. 8. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_history/8 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Nicolas Soto DECIMATION, REJUVENATION, MOTIVATION: HOW DISEASE AND MURDER SET THE STAGE AT SARATOGA Imagine your worst fear. Now imagine being killed and scalped in your wedding attire on the way to meet your fiancé. Your fear does not probably seem so bad now, right? Adding on to it, imagine that you were sick with smallpox while on your journey. You would be walking around with a terrible disease which eats away at the body and eventually kills you. These are not fears which we can imagine as vividly as the colonists in the 1770s could. Smallpox and being scalped were legitimate worries of the time for American colonists. Murder and disease ran rampant throughout the colonies. Not to mention the fact that they were embroiled in a revolution with the British Empire to pile on the misery.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Hamilton on the $10 Bill: How He Got There and Why It Matters by Brian Phillips Murphy
    Alexander Hamilton on the $10 Bill: How He Got There and Why It Matters by Brian Phillips Murphy 2015 was a big year for Alexander Hamilton. Nearly two hundred eleven years after the nation’s first treasury secretary was shot and killed in a duel with then Vice President of the United States Aaron Burr, an Off Broadway play opened at the Public Theater in New York City’s East Village to rave reviews and sold-out houses. The brainchild of Tony Award–winning playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda, Hamilton had an extended run and remained the toughest ticket to score in town. By the summer, the hip-hop–infused musical was bound for a bigger home on Broadway, having created a boom of interest in all things Alexander Hamilton. Then along came the Treasury Department to spoil the party. In June, Jack Lew—the 75th person to succeed Hamilton as treasury secretary—announced a surprise plan to bump his predecessor’s portrait from the face of the $10 bill by the year 2020 so that a Alexander Hamilton by John Trumbull, 1805 (City woman could appear on the nation’s paper money. Hall Portrait Collection, Public Design Commission He asked people to submit names for consideration of the City of New York) during the summer and even asked people to begin using a hashtag on Facebook and Twitter: #TheNew10. Currency redesigns are nothing new in the history of US paper money. In fact, they are fairly frequent; new security features like holograms, special threads with printed numbers and “USA,” and watermarks are added every seven years or so to keep up with new technologies used by counterfeiters.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Hamilton: the $10 Note Brochure
    ALEXANDER HAMILTON FOUNDING FATHER OF THE UNITED STATES Alexander Hamilton • John Trumbull after Giuseppe Ceracchi • 1806 • Oil on canvas National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution; gift of Henry Cabot Lodge OBSERVATION AND ANALYSIS: • What adjectives would you use to describe how Hamilton is represented in the painted portrait? • How can we use this portrait of Hamilton to determine the era in which he lived? • Compare Hamilton’s portrait to his image on the $10 note. • Write a persuasive essay responding to the following question: Why was Alexander Hamilton chosen to be represented on the $10 note? ALEXANDER HAMILTON Born in the West Indies, Alexander Hamilton was orphaned at a young age. During his adolescence, he gained knowledge about international commerce while working as an accounting clerk for a local businessman. Hamilton moved to America in 1772 to attend King’s College (now Columbia University). Shortly after arriving, he began to speak in favor of American independence at public gatherings and to write revolutionary essays. It was while fighting in the Revolutionary War that he first caught the attention of General George Washington, who made Hamilton a trusted adviser. Hamilton assisted in the ratification of the Constitution after America gained its independence from England. Alongside John Jay and James Madison, he co-authored the Federalist Papers in the late 1780s. The three men used these essays to defend ratifying the Constitution and to argue that a central government would preserve the Union and act firmly in the interests of the nation. Impressed with Hamilton’s expertise in economics, George Washington named him the first Secretary of the Treasury.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Hamilton & Isaac Ledyard, Pamphlet War on the Postwar
    MAKING THE REVOLUTION: AMERICA, 1763-1791 PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION A Pamphlet War on the Library of Congress Postwar Treatment of Loyalists by PHOCION & MENTOR (Alexander Hamilton & Isaac Ledyard) NEW YORK, 1784 EXCERPTS * The war was over. The Patriots had won, the British were leaving, and the Loyalists were . still there. How to deal with the British supporters was a vexing issue that tested the nation’s professed stand for liberty and justice. Let them live among us or expel them? Remove their citizenship or urge their return to the body politic? Troubling and divisive questions for Patriots, especially in New York City, which had been a Loyalist refuge and British wartime headquarters. Shunned and despised, the Loyalists were con- demned as traitors who deserved only vengeance. Harsh new laws restricted their civil rights and property claims. Into this toxic atmos- phere came an unexpected advocate of moderationAlexander Hamilton, who as a college student had engaged in his first pamphlet war and who had served as Washington’s trusted aide-de-camp during the war. Fearing harm to the fragile new nation from the 1 extremism of impassioned victors, Hamilton entered the fray. A Patriot (right) raises a knife against a Loyalist trying to A lawyer, Hamilton defended over forty New York Loyalists in law- replace the Patriot banner (depicting a pine tree and topped suits filed by Patriots whose property had been taken by Loyalists with a liberty cap, signifying America) with a Loyalist banner during the war. He argued that legalized retribution violated the depicting the British lion. Cartouche detail of a 1776 French peace treaty with Britain and opened the door for homegrown map of Boston.1 tyranny and mass violation of citizens’ rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Hamilton Attacks Governor George Clinton, 21 July–30 October 1787
    Alexander Hamilton Attacks Governor George Clinton, 21 July–30 October 1787 In the spring and summer of 1787 the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia to revise and amend the Articles of Confederation. Three or four weeks after the Convention began its sessions on 25 May, it became known that, instead of amending the Articles, the Convention would establish a new government for the United States. Advocates of such a government in New York and Pennsylvania believed that the principal opposition to it would come from state officeholders who feared they would lose their power. The first known public attack on these state officeholders was made by a correspondent in the Pennsylvania Gazette on 20 June, who warned officeholders to be quiet or else they would suffer the same fate suffered by Loyalists early in the American Revolution. This brief item was reprinted in the New York Journal, 28 June, and Northern Centinel, 2 July. The most important attack on any state officeholder was made against New York Governor George Clinton in the Daily Advertiser on 21 July by Alexander Hamilton, a New York delegate to the Constitutional Convention on leave from that body. Writing anonymously, Hamilton claimed that Clinton had opposed the appointment of delegates to the Constitutional Convention and had “predicted a mischievous issue of that measure.” According to Hamilton, Clinton had stated publicly that the Convention was unnecessary and that the “evils” it intended to remedy were imaginary. Hamilton rejected Clinton’s alleged analysis of the Confederation’s political and economic condition and defended the appointment of a convention that would create a strong central government able to address the many “evils” that had befallen America.
    [Show full text]