DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Commons Accommodation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Commons Accommodation House of Commons Administration Committee House of Commons Accommodation Third Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1279 House of Commons Administration Committee House of Commons Accommodation Third Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 June 2006 HC 1279 Published on 6 July 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Administration Committee The Administration Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider the services provided for and by the House and to make recommendations thereon to the House of Commons Commission or to the Speaker. Current membership Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) (Chairman) Mr Bob Ainsworth MP (Labour, Coventry North East) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale & Darwen) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley & Sidcup) Frank Dobson MP (Labour, Holborn & St Pancras) Mr Brian H Donohoe MP (Labour, Central Ayrshire) Mr Neil Gerrard MP (Labour, Walthamstow) Mr Mark Harper MP (Conservative, Forest of Dean) Helen Jones MP (Labour, Warrington North) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Mr Greg Knight MP (Conservative, Yorkshire East) David Lepper MP (Labour/Co-operative, Brighton Pavilion) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, Blaby) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross) Pete Wishart MP (Scottish National, Perth & North Perthshire) The following were also Members of the Committee during the inquiry: Peter Luff MP (Conservative, Mid Worcestershire) The late Mr Eric Forth MP (Conservative, Bromley & Chiselhurst) Powers The powers of the committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 139. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee are on the Internet and can be accessed via www.parliament.uk/ac Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Steven Mark and Nerys Welfoot (Clerks), Ameet Chudasama (Chief Office Clerk) and Jane Lauder (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Administration Committee, Committee Office (Palace of Westminster), House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2471; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Administration Committee: House of Commons Accommodation 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Facts, figures and a brief history 7 The current Estate 7 Ownership and allocation 12 Current strategy 15 History 15 Accommodation review 17 3 Occupants and their accommodation needs 18 Members 18 Members’ staff 20 Temporary staff 21 Front bench and party parliamentary allocation 22 Staff of the House 25 Third parties 26 Non-office accommodation 26 Residential accommodation 27 Meeting rooms 27 Storage 28 Families and children 28 Non-usable space 29 4 Constraints 30 Legacy building issues 30 Palace of Westminster 31 Furniture 31 Information and Communication Technology 32 Expectations 33 Flux and flexibility 35 Systems 36 5 Proposals 39 Devising a strategy 39 Refurbishing sub-standard accommodation 40 Improving Information and Communications Technology 41 Furnishing offices for Members and their staff 42 Managing demand for Members’ staff accommodation 43 6 Conclusion 46 Conclusions and recommendations 47 2 Administration Committee: House of Commons Accommodation Formal minutes 53 List of witnesses 56 List of written evidence 57 Administration Committee Reports in this Parliament 59 Administration Committee: House of Commons Accommodation 3 Summary The Palace of Westminster has for many years been unable to meet the reasonable aspirations of Members of Parliament for office accommodation. In response to this situation, a secure and coherent Estate has been created, extending beyond the Palace to the north of Bridge Street. Almost all Members now have at least one room of their own, and many are clearly able to work comfortably within the offices they have been allocated. But expectations continue to exceed the supply of available space; and some Members remain housed in rooms which are frankly inadequate. Pressure from Members for additional space over the decades has coincided with substantial increases in the numbers of staff of the House, who also need to be provided with a working environment of reasonable quality. The accommodation needs of Members’ staff at Westminster are uncertain because their numbers depend on individual Members’ preferences and circumstances. Failure to meet expectations is as much of a problem as the reality of the accommodation available; so too is failure to establish an attractive alternative for Members to basing their staff at Westminster, by providing reliable facilities for remote working. In this Report, we describe the current situation in terms of buildings, numbers of occupants, allocation processes and existing strategy (Part Two); we assess the accommodation needs of the main occupant groups and the extent to which these are currently met (Part Three); we describe the constraints by which the provision of accommodation is bound (Part Four); and finally, we set out our proposals for improving the current provision on a strategic basis (Part Five). Our proposals focus on devising a long-term accommodation strategy, refurbishing sub- standard accommodation, improving Information and Communications Technology, particularly access from the constituency, furnishing offices according to a standard which meets the needs of Members, and better managing demand for accommodation, particularly for Members’ staff. Administration Committee: House of Commons Accommodation 5 1 Introduction 1. The last inquiry by a Committee of the House into the accommodation provided on the Parliamentary Estate was conducted more than 15 years ago, and focussed on the construction of Portcullis House.1 We decided soon after we were appointed by the House that the time was right to conduct a thorough review of accommodation, given the continuing pressures on the Estate and the fact that some office accommodation remains of an unacceptably low standard, both for Members of Parliament and for other occupants of the Estate. We were also aware of a lack of clarity about the standards of accommodation to be expected by Members and other occupants of the Estate, and about how space on the Estate is used and allocated. 2. The purpose of the House of Commons Administration is to provide facilities for the elected representatives of the British people to meet, deliberate and legislate, to control the executive and the raising and spending of taxes, and to secure the redress of grievances. Members of Parliament should be provided with the means of carrying out these demanding tasks in the modern world, including adequate accommodation and communications facilities. 3. We focus unapologetically in this Report on the rights and needs of Members of Parliament, in whose interests the House has appointed us to act. As we will show, the accommodation available for Members has improved dramatically in recent years with the expansion of the Parliamentary Estate into new and refurbished buildings to the north of Bridge Street. Many Members now have adequate office accommodation at Westminster—but some still do not. We examine why this is the case, and we assess the scope for improving both the extent and the quality of the accommodation available. We acknowledge that accommodation is a limited resource, and we suggest ways in which this resource could be used more efficiently. The numbers of staff of the House and Members’ staff have grown significantly in recent years: they also have a right to expect decent accommodation, and we consider the extent to which this accommodation can be provided at Westminster without infringing on the justified expectations of Members. 1 Select Committee on House of Commons (Services), Second Report of Session 1990–91, New Parliamentary Building (Phase 2): The Initial Brief, HC 551 6 Administration Committee: House of Commons Accommodation 4. We announced our inquiry on 20 January 2006 with terms of reference as follows: a) To assess the existing standards for the office accommodation of Members and their staff, and for other occupants of the Parliamentary Estate. b) To assess whether the accommodation available on the Estate is currently appropriately allocated. c) To examine ways of improving the use of existing space. d) To assess, in the light of the above, whether the needs of the occupants of the Estate, and Members in particular, can be met within the existing buildings, or whether a further expansion of the Estate will be required to meet reasonable demand. e) To suggest how future demand for office accommodation might be managed. 5. In response to our announcement we received written submissions from 29 Members, nine Members’ staff and two staff of the House, and further written evidence from the Board of Management and from representatives of various groups of occupants on the Estate. We heard evidence in private from current and former Accommodation Whips, from senior staff of the House, and from representatives of some of the main groups of occupants of the Estate: Members’ staff, staff of the House and the Press. We are publishing the majority of this evidence. We have seen for ourselves a cross-section of Members’ accommodation in the Palace and in the northern part of the Estate as well as some offices occupied by staff of the House and have spoken to the people working there. The Serjeant at Arms has provided us with plans of the Estate and statistical information. We are grateful to all those who have helped us in our inquiry. 6. In part two of this Report, we set out a factual overview of the buildings currently occupied by the House of Commons and a description of how this space is allocated, followed by a brief history of the events that have led to the current situation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Granada Cinema, Victoria Public House and 186A and 186B Hoe
    Ms J Andrews Our Ref: APP/U5930/E/11/2165344 Howard Sharp and Partners LLP APP/U5930/A/11/2165348 125 High Street APP/U5930/A/12/2183662 Sevenoaks Kent Your ref: JEA/DS.7131 TN13 1UT 22 May 2013 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 APPEALS BY THE INCORPORATED TRUSTEES OF THE UCKG HELPCENTRE THE FORMER GRANADA CINEMA, 186 HOE STREET, THE VICTORIA PUBLIC HOUSE AND 186a and 186b HOE STREET, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 4QH APPLICATION REFs: 2009/1049/LB, 2009/1048 and 2012/0764 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul Griffiths BSc(Hons) BArch IHBC, who held a public local inquiry between 29 November 2012 and 19 December 2012, into your client’s appeals against the refusal of the Council of the London Borough of Waltham Forest (“the Council”): Appeal A: to grant listed building consent for use of the former Granada Cinema, 186 Hoe Street, the Victoria Public House and 186a & 186b Hoe Street to include religious, community/assembly, café and retail uses (A1/A3/D1/D2) along with alterations and restoration of the Grade II* listed building, side and rear extensions, and associated plant, servicing and works; Appeal B: to grant planning permission for use of the former Granada Cinema, 186 Hoe Street, the Victoria Public House and 186a & 186b Hoe Street to include religious, community/assembly, café and retail uses (A1/A3/D1/D2) along with alterations and restoration of the Grade II* listed building, side and rear extensions, and associated plant, servicing and works; Appeal C: redevelopment proposals and associated alterations and works including change of use to mixed use development comprising religious, community, cinema, café and retail uses (D1/D2/A3/A1 Use Classes) with ancillary residential accommodation comprising two x 2 bed and three x 1 bed units.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Harry Cohen
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Harry Cohen Seventh Report of Session 2009–10 HC 310 House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Harry Cohen Seventh Report of Session 2009–10 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 19 January 2009 HC 310 Published on 22 January 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP (Conservative, Kensington & Chelsea) (Chairman) Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Rt hon Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Mr Paddy Tipping MP (Labour, Sherwood) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the Senate of the United Mexican States, Et
    No. 08-987 IN THE RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ON BEHALF OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES, THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PANAMA, MARY ROBINSON (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, 1997- 2002; PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, 1992-1997) AND LEGISLATORS FROM THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNTRIES OF BRAZIL, BELGIUM, CHILE, GERMANY, IRELAND, JAPAN, MEXICO, SCOTLAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM ______________ Michael Avery Counsel of Record Suffolk Law School 120 Tremont Street Boston, MA 02108 617-573-8551 ii AMICI CURIAE The Senate of the United Mexican States The National Assembly of Panama Mary Robinson (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1997-2002; President of Ireland, 1992-1997) Legislators from the European Parliament Josep Borrell Fontelles, former President Enrique Barón Crespo, former President Miguel Ángel Martínez, Vice-President Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Vice-President Luisa Morgantini, Vice-President Mia De Vits, Quaestor Jo Leinen, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs Richard Howitt, Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Guisto Catania, Vice-Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Willy Meyer Pleite, Vice-Chair of the Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly Edite Estrela, Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review a Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review a Summary and Way Forward
    Youth Engagement Review A Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review A Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review A Summary and Way Forward CADE D T E N F I O B R C M E O C Contents Foreword by Rt Hon Andrew Robathan MP Minister for Defence Personnel Welfare and Veterans 2 SECTION 1 Defence Youth Engagement as it is today. 3 Case Study – Operation Youth Advantage + 5 SECTION 2 The need for a review 6 SECTION 3 The benefits to Defence of engaging Young People 8 SECTION 4 The benefits to Society of Defence Youth Engagement 9 Case Study – Aftermath of the August 2011 riots 11 SECTION 5 Analysis of youth engagement activity 12 Case Study – Cadet service improving life outcomes 14 SECTION 6 Implementing the YER and beyond 15 Case Study – Education Outreach 17 Case Study – Cadets striving for excellence 18 Youth Engagement Review 1 Foreword by Rt Hon Andrew Robathan MP Minister for Defence Personnel Welfare and Veterans his brief report summarises the Defence Youth Engagement Review (YER) and how the MOD intends Tto take it forward. I commissioned this Review in July 2010 in the wake of celebrations marking the 150th anniversary of the Cadet Forces. I wanted to ensure that we were making the most of not just the Cadet Forces but the many other youth engagement activities that the MOD, including the Armed Forces, undertake. I believe that not enough is done to promote the work that we do in this area. For too long we have been keeping Defence’s Youth Engagement activities to ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Web of Power
    Media Briefing MAIN HEADING PARAGRAPH STYLE IS main head Web of power SUB TITLE PARAGRAPH STYLE IS main sub head The UK government and the energy- DATE PARAGRAPH STYLE IS date of document finance complex fuelling climate change March 2013 Research by the World Development Movement has Government figures embroiled in the nexus of money and revealed that one third of ministers in the UK government power fuelling climate change include William Hague, are linked to the finance and energy companies driving George Osborne, Michael Gove, Oliver Letwin, Vince Cable climate change. and even David Cameron himself. This energy-finance complex at the heart of government If we are to move away from a high carbon economy, is allowing fossil fuel companies to push the planet to the government must break this nexus and regulate the the brink of climate catastrophe, risking millions of lives, finance sector’s investment in fossil fuel energy. especially in the world’s poorest countries. SUBHEAD PARAGRAPH STYLE IS head A Introduction The world is approaching the point of no return in the Energy-finance complex in figures climate crisis. Unless emissions are massively reduced now, BODY PARAGRAPH STYLE IS body text Value of fossil fuel shares on the London Stock vast areas of the world will see increased drought, whole Exchange: £900 billion1 – higher than the GDP of the countries will be submerged and falling crop yields could whole of sub-Saharan Africa.2 mean millions dying of hunger. But finance is continuing to flow to multinational fossil fuel companies that are Top five UK banks’ underwrote £170 billion in bonds ploughing billions into new oil, gas and coal energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador's Activities
    Ambassador’s Activities Distributor: French Embassy in the UK - Press and Communications Services - 58 Knightsbridge, SW1X 7JT London 2012 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: www.ambafrance-uk.org Speech by HE Bernard Emié, French Ambassador to the United Kingdom at the FRUK Defence Forum Roundtable London, 19 Septembre 2012 www.ambafrance-uk.org It’s not easy to be invited at a week’s notice to close a conference we haven’t attended, in the presence of so many experts! But let’s get back to the basics of our strategic defence relations, which remain an absolute priority for the French authorities that emerged from the elections of May and June 2012. I/ The solidity of Franco-British defence cooperation I’d like, first of all, to recall a few simple and basic facts about Franco-British defence cooperation. It’s a solid partnership rooted in a shared vision of the great defence and security challenges. It’s a partnership that will continue to play a key role in the long term. A/ First of all, our two countries’ strategic proximity reflects the similarity of the challenges we face : - We are of similar size . But on the new world stage, we no longer reach the critical mass; - We have similar values and similar responsibilities . Our two nations are permanent members of the UN Security Council, key members of the European Union, key members of NATO; - Both our nations have a nuclear deterrent , which places us in a category of our own, with specific responsibilities and a specific policy stake in the complex world of counter-proliferation; - We face similar challenges and threats .
    [Show full text]
  • Information and Communication Technology Services for Members
    House of Commons Administration Committee Information and Communication Technology Services for Members Second Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 April 2007 HC 498 Published on 8 May 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Administration Committee The Administration Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider the services provided for and by the House and to make recommendations thereon to the House of Commons Commission or to the Speaker. Current membership Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) (Chairman) Mr Bob Ainsworth MP (Labour, Coventry North East) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale & Darwen) Mr Simon Burns MP (Conservative, Chelmsford West) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley & Sidcup) Frank Dobson MP (Labour, Holborn & St Pancras) Mr Brian H Donohoe MP (Labour, Central Ayrshire) Mr Neil Gerrard MP (Labour, Walthamstow) Helen Jones MP (Labour, Warrington North) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Mr Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) David Lepper MP (Labour/Co-operative, Brighton Pavilion) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, Blaby) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross) Pete Wishart MP (Scottish National, Perth & North Perthshire) Mr Mark Harper MP (Conservative, Forest of Dean) was also a member of the committee during the inquiry. Powers The powers of the committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 139. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Web of Power the UK Government and the Energy- Finance Complex Fuelling Climate Change March 2013
    Media briefing Web of power The UK government and the energy- finance complex fuelling climate change March 2013 Research by the World Development Movement has Government figures embroiled in the nexus of money and revealed that one third of ministers in the UK government power fuelling climate change include William Hague, are linked to the finance and energy companies driving George Osborne, Michael Gove, Oliver Letwin, Vince Cable climate change. and even David Cameron himself. This energy-finance complex at the heart of government If we are to move away from a high carbon economy, is allowing fossil fuel companies to push the planet to the government must break this nexus and regulate the the brink of climate catastrophe, risking millions of lives, finance sector’s investment in fossil fuel energy. especially in the world’s poorest countries. Introduction The world is approaching the point of no return in the Energy-finance complex in figures climate crisis. Unless emissions are massively reduced now, Value of fossil fuel shares on the London Stock vast areas of the world will see increased drought, whole Exchange: £900 billion1 – higher than the GDP of the countries will be submerged and falling crop yields could whole of sub-Saharan Africa.2 mean millions dying of hunger. But finance is continuing to flow to multinational fossil fuel companies that are Top five UK banks’ underwrote £170 billion in bonds ploughing billions into new oil, gas and coal energy. and share issues for fossil fuel companies 2010-12 – more than 11 times the amount the UK contributed in The vested interests of big oil, gas and coal mining climate finance for developing countries.3 companies are in favour of the status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens' Perceptions of Standards in Public Life
    CITIZENS’ PERCEPTIONS OF STANDARDS IN PUBLIC LIFE JONATHAN RICHARD ROSE, M.A. SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JULY 2012 Abstract This thesis analyses citizens' perceptions of standards in public life. It attempts to understand whether perceptions such as these are important substantively for questions of citizen disaffection, and begins the task of analyzing how citizens come to hold the perceptions they do. The thesis presents a systematic investigation into this topic, placing perceived standards in the context of a discussion about citizen disaffection and the perceived legitimacy of political systems. As they are conceived of in this thesis, 'standards in public life' can usefully be thought of as the 'rules of the game' or the 'spirit of public service'. Standards in public life are less a set of formal, prescriptive rules, more an exhortation to the appropriate exercise of public office. Such a focus upon the 'rules of the game' results in the primary concern of this thesis being about the process of governing, as opposed to the outcomes governors can produce. The thesis investigates perceptions of standards in two parts. Part 1 considers broad questions of the conceptualisation, measurement and structure of citizen beliefs about government in general, and perceptions of standards in particular. The findings of Part 1 therefore provide a base upon which future analyses can be built. Part 2 investigates the causes of perceptions of standards, focusing upon three aspects of political ‘conditions’: partisan co-alignment, the ‘scandal’ concerning Derek Conway’s use of parliamentary expenses to employ his son to do essentially no work, and the MPs’ expenses scandal.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill ARMED FORCES BILL Fourth Sitting Thursday 17 February 2011 CONTENTS New clauses considered. Committee adjourned at eighteen minutes to Twelve o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £5·00 PBC (Bill 122) 2010 - 2011 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 21 February 2011 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 87 Select Committee on the17 FEBRUARY 2011 Armed Forces Bill 88 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chair: MR JAMES ARBUTHNOT † Cunningham, Alex (Stockton North) (Lab) † Osborne, Sandra (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock)
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]