Information and Communication Technology Services for Members

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information and Communication Technology Services for Members House of Commons Administration Committee Information and Communication Technology Services for Members Second Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 April 2007 HC 498 Published on 8 May 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Administration Committee The Administration Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider the services provided for and by the House and to make recommendations thereon to the House of Commons Commission or to the Speaker. Current membership Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) (Chairman) Mr Bob Ainsworth MP (Labour, Coventry North East) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale & Darwen) Mr Simon Burns MP (Conservative, Chelmsford West) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley & Sidcup) Frank Dobson MP (Labour, Holborn & St Pancras) Mr Brian H Donohoe MP (Labour, Central Ayrshire) Mr Neil Gerrard MP (Labour, Walthamstow) Helen Jones MP (Labour, Warrington North) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Mr Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) David Lepper MP (Labour/Co-operative, Brighton Pavilion) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, Blaby) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross) Pete Wishart MP (Scottish National, Perth & North Perthshire) Mr Mark Harper MP (Conservative, Forest of Dean) was also a member of the committee during the inquiry. Powers The powers of the committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 139. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee are on the Internet and can be accessed via www.parliament.uk/ac. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Steven Mark and Rhiannon Hollis (Clerks), Ameet Chudasama (Chief Office Clerk) and Jane Lauder (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Administration Committee, Committee Office (Palace of Westminster), House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2471; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Administration Committee – Information and Communication Technology Services for Members 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 Background to the inquiry 5 Current service provision 6 Previous work 8 2 Establishing best practice and identifying possible comparators 10 Specific examples 10 Possible comparators 11 3 Departmental structure and goals 12 Formal channels of communication 12 Strategy and roadmap 13 4 Stability v flexibility 15 Members’ views 15 PICT’s view 15 Professional views 16 A way forward 17 Alternative ways of accessing parliamentary services 18 5 Constituency provision 19 Virtual Private Network service issues 19 Options for improving the constituency service 20 Support for applications used in Members’ constituency work 23 Testing and development 23 6 Customer service 24 7 Providing IT equipment to Members 27 The 2005 roll-out of equipment 27 Future roll-outs 28 Quality and cost 29 8 New services 31 Audio-conferencing 31 Wireless and mobile computing 32 Online services 33 Improvements to existing services 34 9 Conclusion 36 Conclusions and recommendations 37 2 Administration Committee – Information and Communication Technology Services for Members Annex: Committee discussions 42 17 October 2006: Opening discussion with Director of PICT 42 21 November 2006 42 Opening discussion with Mr John Milner and Professor Jim Norton, Specialist Advisers to the Committee 43 Informal discussion with Chris Montagnon, external member of the Joint Business Systems Board (JBSB) 44 Informal discussion with Michael Fabricant MP, Alun Michael MP and Andrew Miller MP 45 Concluding discussion with the Specialist Advisers to the Committee 47 5 December 2006: Informal discussion with Richard Allan 47 12 December 2006: Informal discussion with Andrew Hardie 50 30 January 2007: Concluding discussion with Director of PICT 51 Formal minutes 53 List of written evidence 55 List of unprinted written evidence 57 Administration Committee Reports in this Parliament 58 Administration Committee – Information and Communication Technology Services for Members 3 Summary The Parliamentary Information and Communications Technology Department (PICT) was established in January 2006, bringing together ICT staff and other resources from across both Houses of Parliament into a unified organisation. Our focus in this Report is on those services provided for Members of the House of Commons and their staff. In the context of a significant undertone of dissatisfaction with these services, we want to ensure that processes are in place to enable Members’ services to be delivered efficiently and to an agreed standard, and to manage Members’ often divergent ICT preferences. In this Report, we describe how ICT services are currently provided and outline the work undertaken by Members and others in the recent past to create the current system of provision (Part One); and we seek to identify best practice elsewhere and possible points of comparison with the way services are provided in Parliament (Part Two). We then look at how Members’ emerging requirements can be plugged into PICT’s strategic planning, and how PICT could make itself better aware of Members’ evolving use of ICT, in part through a new forum for investigating possible improvements to the existing service (Part Three). We then go on to tackle the issues of most direct concern to individual Members: the tension between providing consistent, stable services and meeting Members’ varying requirements (Part Four); extending services in the constituency so that they are comparable with those on offer at Westminster (Part Five); providing professional and reliable customer service with clear escalation procedures (Part Six); and providing up-to-date, good-value ICT equipment to Members that meets their requirements in a timely way (Part Seven). Finally, we investigate new services from which Members would be likely to benefit, either in the very near future or in the slightly longer term (Part Eight). PICT’s first priority must be to optimise existing services, starting with stability issues and connection speed, especially in the constituency, and ensuring that future roll-outs of new equipment are seamless and well-managed. But there is a strong expectation that new services, including wireless networking, will also be provided very soon—and the speed of technological development demands it. At the same time communications between PICT and Members need to be significantly scaled up. Real ongoing consultation is required for PICT to understand and meet Members’ needs and to measure demand for services. This will require dedicated PICT staff responsible for developing relationships with Members and their staff, and a separate Members’ customer forum, also involving Members’ staff, to help to develop strategies and service levels. We want to ensure that PICT has a better understanding of Members’ expectations, and that Members have a correct sense of what PICT can and cannot do for them. Members as well as PICT have responsibility for the ICT systems in their offices. We are sure that most Members would not welcome further limitations on their freedom to customise centrally provided equipment. However, Members’ freedom to install unsupported applications locally makes PICT’s task more costly and complicated than it would otherwise be. Until they can access the full range of Parliamentary ICT services securely over the Internet, Members will need to accept the existing restrictions on the equipment they can use and on how they can use it. In return, however, they have every right to expect a good standard of service. Administration Committee – Information and Communication Technology Services for Members 5 1 Introduction Background to the inquiry 1. Information and Communications Technology (ICT) services have become critical to the work of Members of Parliament, and this importance can only increase. Even the decreasing number of Members who do not use computers themselves rely on staff who do. 2. The Parliamentary Information and Communications Technology Department (PICT) was established in January 2006, bringing together for the first time ICT staff and other resources from across both Houses of Parliament into a unified organisation under a single accountable Director. This was a strategic response to the previously fragmented planning and implementation of ICT across Parliament, which involved numerous separately managed teams working on overlapping and often inter-dependent systems, without an overview of resources. 3. PICT provides services to the Members and staff of both Houses of Parliament. Our focus is on those services provided for Members of the House of Commons and their staff. Members of Parliament are not a homogenous body of people. They work in different ways and they have correspondingly divergent demands for ICT services. The feedback we have received from Members since we were appointed in July 2005 has made us aware of a significant undertone of dissatisfaction with the ICT services provided by Parliament. We want to ensure that processes are in place to enable appropriate Members’ services to be delivered efficiently and to an agreed standard.
Recommended publications
  • Granada Cinema, Victoria Public House and 186A and 186B Hoe
    Ms J Andrews Our Ref: APP/U5930/E/11/2165344 Howard Sharp and Partners LLP APP/U5930/A/11/2165348 125 High Street APP/U5930/A/12/2183662 Sevenoaks Kent Your ref: JEA/DS.7131 TN13 1UT 22 May 2013 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 APPEALS BY THE INCORPORATED TRUSTEES OF THE UCKG HELPCENTRE THE FORMER GRANADA CINEMA, 186 HOE STREET, THE VICTORIA PUBLIC HOUSE AND 186a and 186b HOE STREET, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 4QH APPLICATION REFs: 2009/1049/LB, 2009/1048 and 2012/0764 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul Griffiths BSc(Hons) BArch IHBC, who held a public local inquiry between 29 November 2012 and 19 December 2012, into your client’s appeals against the refusal of the Council of the London Borough of Waltham Forest (“the Council”): Appeal A: to grant listed building consent for use of the former Granada Cinema, 186 Hoe Street, the Victoria Public House and 186a & 186b Hoe Street to include religious, community/assembly, café and retail uses (A1/A3/D1/D2) along with alterations and restoration of the Grade II* listed building, side and rear extensions, and associated plant, servicing and works; Appeal B: to grant planning permission for use of the former Granada Cinema, 186 Hoe Street, the Victoria Public House and 186a & 186b Hoe Street to include religious, community/assembly, café and retail uses (A1/A3/D1/D2) along with alterations and restoration of the Grade II* listed building, side and rear extensions, and associated plant, servicing and works; Appeal C: redevelopment proposals and associated alterations and works including change of use to mixed use development comprising religious, community, cinema, café and retail uses (D1/D2/A3/A1 Use Classes) with ancillary residential accommodation comprising two x 2 bed and three x 1 bed units.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Harry Cohen
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Harry Cohen Seventh Report of Session 2009–10 HC 310 House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Harry Cohen Seventh Report of Session 2009–10 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 19 January 2009 HC 310 Published on 22 January 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP (Conservative, Kensington & Chelsea) (Chairman) Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Rt hon Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Mr Paddy Tipping MP (Labour, Sherwood) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of All-Party Groups
    REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS (As at 13 June 2007) REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 2 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 The Nature of All-Party Groups ..................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Register of All-Party Groups’............................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Approved List’ of Groups..................................................... 2 Administration of the Register and Approved List......................................................... 4 Complaints about All-Party Groups................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Country Groups ...................................................................................................... 6 Section 2: Subject Groups.................................................................................................... 141 REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 3 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS INTRODUCTION The Nature of All-Party Groups All-party groups are regarded as relatively informal compared with other cross-party bodies such as select committees of the House. The membership of all-party groups mainly comprises backbench Members of the House of Commons and Lords but may also include ministers and non-parliamentarians. Groups flourish and wane according to the interests and enthusiasm of Members.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contemporary Vision for the Former Granada Cinema, Walthamstow
    A CONTEMPORARY VISION FOR THE FORMER GRANADA CINEMA, WALTHAMSTOW Reinventing an extraordinary heritage to create 21st century entertainment in an Olympic borough. A CONTEMPORARY VISION FOR THE FORMER GRANADA CINEMA, WALTHAMSTOW CONTENTS A vision rooted in the local community 1 Our vision that unites the ambitions of local businesses, 2 The team the local authority policies of the Mayor of 3 Heritage London, Arts Council England, political parties 4 Future programme and the people of Waltham Forest; this project 5 Architectural plans has successfully engaged leading cultural 6 What do local organisations and architects to create a viable people want? and compelling vision for the future of this 7 Finance historic building. Waltham Forest Cinema Trust and Soho Theatre ‘Soho Theatre is a powerful comedy venue, now known internationally as the place for comedians to perform in London. I have performed there many times, often trying out new work. Their plans for a larger venue at the former Granada are very positive and, from a performer’s perspective, it makes all the difference that the people running it have a passion for performance in general and comedy in particular. My first ever gig in London was at a small club in Walthamstow and it would be a fine idea to be able to return to Walthamstow and play one of the Front Cover: The former Granada Cinema © McGuffin and Cinema Theatre Association. newest venues in London.”’ Opposite page: Main auditorium of the former Granada Cinema © Cinema Theatre Association. This page: The former Granada Cinema welcomes Eddie Izzard comedy © Cinema Theatre Association 1 OUR VISION THE TEAM Our vision is to create an iconic cultural Subject to further discussion and detail, venue with a programme that is contemporary, the current team includes: inclusive and respectful of this building’s Waltham Forest Cinema Trust remarkable heritage The Trust’s founding directors are rooted in the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Accommodation
    House of Commons Administration Committee House of Commons Accommodation Third Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1279 House of Commons Administration Committee House of Commons Accommodation Third Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 June 2006 HC 1279 Published on 6 July 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Administration Committee The Administration Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider the services provided for and by the House and to make recommendations thereon to the House of Commons Commission or to the Speaker. Current membership Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) (Chairman) Mr Bob Ainsworth MP (Labour, Coventry North East) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale & Darwen) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley & Sidcup) Frank Dobson MP (Labour, Holborn & St Pancras) Mr Brian H Donohoe MP (Labour, Central Ayrshire) Mr Neil Gerrard MP (Labour, Walthamstow) Mr Mark Harper MP (Conservative, Forest of Dean) Helen Jones MP (Labour, Warrington North) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Mr Greg Knight MP (Conservative, Yorkshire East) David Lepper MP (Labour/Co-operative, Brighton Pavilion) Mr Andrew Robathan MP (Conservative, Blaby) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross) Pete Wishart MP (Scottish National, Perth & North Perthshire) The following were also Members of the Committee during the inquiry: Peter Luff MP (Conservative, Mid Worcestershire) The late Mr Eric Forth MP (Conservative, Bromley & Chiselhurst) Powers The powers of the committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 139.
    [Show full text]
  • MUSLIMS in LONDON in MUSLIMS Muslims in London
    MuslimsinLondon-cover-20120625_Layout 1 2012.06.25. 12:44 Page 1 AT HOME IN EUROPE ★ MUSLIMS IN LONDON Muslims in London Whether citizens or migrants, native born or newly-arrived, Muslims are a growing and varied population that presents Europe with challenges and opportunities. The crucial tests facing Europe’s commitment to open society will be how it treats minorities such as Muslims and ensures equal rights for all in a climate of rapidly expanding diversity. The Open Society Foundations’ At Home in Europe project is working to address these issues through monitoring and advocacy activities that examine the position of Muslims and other minorities in Europe. One of the project’s key efforts is this series of reports on Muslim communities in the 11 EU cities of Amsterdam, Antwerp, Berlin, Copenhagen, Hamburg, Leicester, London, Marseille, Paris, Rotterdam, and Stockholm. The reports aim to increase understanding of the needs and aspirations of diverse Muslim communities by examining how public policies in selected cities have helped or hindered the political, social, and economic participation of Muslims. By fostering new dialogue and policy initiatives between Muslim communities, local officials, and international policymakers, the At Home in Europe project seeks to improve the participation and inclusion of Muslims in the wider society while enabling them to preserve the cultural, linguistic, and religious practices that are important to their identities. muslims-in-london-incover-publish-20120621_publish.qxd 2012.06.21. 14:17 Page 1 Muslims in London At Home in Europe Project muslims-in-london-incover-publish-20120621_publish.qxd 2012.06.21. 14:17 Page 2 ©2012 Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Political Map 2008
    BOROUGH POLITICAL CONTROL 1998 2002 2006 LONDON’S CONSERVATIVE 4 8 14 LABOUR 18 15 7 LIBERAL DEMOCRAT 2 3 3 THE MAYOR CHAIRMAN NO OVERALL CONTROL 8 6 8 Boris Johnson LONDON COUNCILS POLITICAL Conservative Councillor Majority: 139,772 Merrick Cockell LONDON COUNCILS ENFIELD & HARINGEY MAP 2008 Joanne McCartney CHAIRMAN Merrick Cockell Labour CHIEF EXECUTIVE John O’Brien Majority: 1,402 Here’s an updated London Political www.londoncouncils.gov.uk Map following the GLA Elections on GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY 1 May 2008. We have highlighted the 14 BARNET & CAMDEN Brian Coleman London Assembly super-constituencies Conservative Majority: 19,693 THE MAYOR Boris Johnson alongside the 33 boroughs. NORTH EAST FIRST DEPUTY MAYOR & CHIEF Hackney, Islington EXECUTIVE OF THE GLA GROUP Tim Parker and Waltham Forest Jennette Arnold CHIEF EXECUTIVE Anthony Mayer (until September 2008) Labour www.london.gov.uk Majority: 28,437 HAVERING & REDBRIDGE Roger Evans Conservative LONDON WIDE ASSEMBLY MEMBERS ENFIELD Majority: 43,025 BRENT & HARROW Michael Rye Navin Shah Labour Majority: 1,649 GARETH BACON RICHARD BARNBROOK Conservative BNP BARNET Mike Freer HARROW WALTHAM FOREST David Ashton Lab/LDem coalition HARINGEY Clyde Loakes (Lab) George Meehan REDBRIDGE ANDREW BOFF VICTORIA BORWICK Alan Weinberg Conservative Conservative HAVERING Michael White BRENT EALING & HILLINGDON LDem/Con coalition HACKNEY DEE DOOCEY NICKY GAVRON Paul Lorber (LDem) CAMDEN ISLINGTON Mayor Jules Pipe (Lab) Liberal Democrat Labour Richard Barnes LDem/Con coalition LDem minority Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Pages of Different Local Campaigns Across the Country
    The Socialist issue 844 Page 1 of 32 Socialist Party | Print Workers' pay down £2,500... Bosses' pay up £700,000 Fight for decent pay, jobs and benefits James Kerr Feeling the pinch? Cutting back on spending? Wondering how you'll make it to the end of the month? You're not alone. Workers everywhere are struggling with stagnating wages and rising prices. A recent TUC report confirmed what we're experiencing on a daily basis when it outlined that workers are £2,500 a year worse off since the start of the Con-Dem government. That's an 8.4% fall in five years! Government attacks on working class people are absolutely unrelenting. Cameron recently pledged to cut housing benefit for 18 to 21 year olds if the Tories win the next election. Now, in yet another slave-labour workfare scheme, he wants young people to be forced to work for their benefits after six months of unemployment. And that's on top of cutting the benefit cap by another £3,000 a year - again hitting hardest some of the most vulnerable people in society. Contrast that with what's happening in Britain's boardrooms, where fat cats have seen their pay soar by 26% - £700,000 - in a year. Big winner Who is singled out as a big winner in the report? None other than Stuart Gulliver, chief executive of HSBC, the bank implicated in a massive tax avoidance scandal. It makes Cameron's 2009 "we're all in this together" refrain seem like a really sick joke.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DOCUMENT.Indd
    London Councils' Directory 2007 A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LONDON London Councils (formerly the Association of London Government) 591/2 Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Tel: 020 7934 9999 Fax: 020 7934 9991 ISBN: 1 85494 121 6 Price £35.00* September 2006 *£17.50 to London boroughs & voluntary organisations 1 2 CONTENTS About us 7 Greater London Employment Forum 11 Grants Committee 12 Leaders’ Committee 10 Staff 14 Transport and Environment Committee 13 London Government A brief history 17 Recent changes to London’s government 17 The London boroughs 19 Borough election results 2006 21 Town Hall addresses 24 About the data 27 The London boroughs Barking and Dagenham 28 Barnet 33 Bexley 40 Brent 46 Bromley 52 Camden 58 Croydon 63 Ealing 69 Enfield 76 Greenwich 82 Hackney 89 Hammersmith and Fulham 95 Haringey 100 Harrow 107 Havering 113 Hillingdon 119 Hounslow 125 Islington 132 Kensington and Chelsea 137 Kingston upon Thames 143 Lambeth 150 Lewisham 156 Merton 161 Newham 166 3 CONTENTS The London boroughs (continued) Redbridge 173 Richmond upon Thames 181 Southwark 188 Sutton 195 Tower Hamlets 201 Waltham Forest 208 Wandsworth 214 Westminster 222 City of London 228 Greater London Authority 236 London Development Agency 239 London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority 241 Metropolitan Police Authority 244 Transport for London 246 London MPs 247 London MEPs 249 Government departments 250 London local government professional associations 253 Health care in London 256 London Learning and Skills Councils 262 Other useful addresses 265 Media
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections and Elections for a London Mayor and Assembly: 4 May 2000
    RESEARCH PAPER 00/53 The local elections and 23 MAY 2000 elections for a London Mayor and Assembly: 4 May 2000 This paper provides a summary of the local elections that took place in England on 4 May 2000 These elections were the first to include various pilot schemes to improve turnout in local elections. Their effect is also considered. The paper also includes detailed results and analysis of the first elections for a London Mayor and Assembly held on the same day. Richard Cracknell & Joseph Hicks SOCIAL AND GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 00/37 The Criminal Justice and Court Services Bill: Drug Testing [Bill 91 of 1999-2000] 27.03.00 00/38 Direct taxes: rates & allowances 2000-01 29.03.00 00/39 The Learning and Skills Bill [HL] [Bill 96 of 1999-2000] 28.03.00 00/40 The Nuclear Safeguards Bill [HL] [Bill 59 of 1999-2000] 30.03.00 00/41 Economic Indicators 03.04.00 00/42 Advisers to Ministers 05.04.00 00/43 Census (Amendment) Bill [HL] [Bill 100 of 1999-2000] 05.04.00 00/44 The Local Government Bill [HL]: Local government leadership etc 06.04.00 [Bill 87 of 1999-2000] 00/45 The Local Government Bill [HL]: Electoral Aspects [Bill 87 of 1999-2000] 06.04.00 00/46 The Local Government Bill [HL]: welfare services and social services 06.04.00 functions [Bill 87 of 1999-2000] 00/47 The Local Government Bill [HL]: the ‘Section 28’ debate 06.04.00 [Bill 87 of 1999-2000] 00/48 Unemployment by Constituency – March 2000 19.04.00 00/49 Intergovernmental Conference 2000: the main agenda 19.04.00 00/50 Part-time work 15.05.00 00/51 Unemployment by Constituency – April 2000 17.05.00 00/52 The Care Standards Bill [HL] [Bill 105 of 1999-2000] 16.05.00 Research Papers are available as PDF files: • to members of the general public on the Parliamentary web site, URL: http://www.parliament.uk • within Parliament to users of the Parliamentary Intranet, URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
    [Show full text]
  • London Government Directory Greater London Enterprise
    London government directory Greater London Enterprise Property investment and development Programme management and consulting Commercial finance Enterprise development London’s economic development company bringing commercial know-how to public policy, and delivering economic regeneration .gle.co.uk For more information, please contact: Greater London Enterprise www 28 Park Street London SE1 9EQ Tel: 020 7403 0300 [email protected] www.gle.co.uk The London Government Directory 2006 A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN A A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LONDON ©Association of London Government 591/2 Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Tel: 020 7934 9999 Fax: 020 7934 9991 ISBN: 1 85494 165 8 Price £35.00* September 2005 *£17.50 to London boroughs & voluntary organisations 1 Minimum Environmental Impact for Maximum Printed Impact! Photograph by Jeff [email protected] Every year Sprinters looks at the way we affect our environment and how we can reduce waste when printing the literature our capital city needs. This year we have introduced a new press which operates on a waterless litho system with fully recyclable plates. The result is less chemistry and a more energy efficient output while still offering a full range of recycled papers and boards. For more information about Sprinters please call or visit our website. Sprinters (London) Limited Churchill House, 114 Windmill Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9NB Tel: 020 8847 2128 Fax: 020 8569 8681 ISDN: 020 8560 9547 [email protected] www.sprinters.co.uk CONTENTS London Government A brief history
    [Show full text]