DOCSLIB.ORG

Register of All-Party Groups

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Register of All-Party Groups REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS (As at 13 June 2007) REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 2 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 The Nature of All-Party Groups ..................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Register of All-Party Groups’............................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Approved List’ of Groups..................................................... 2 Administration of the Register and Approved List......................................................... 4 Complaints about All-Party Groups................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Country Groups ...................................................................................................... 6 Section 2: Subject Groups.................................................................................................... 141 REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 3 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS INTRODUCTION The Nature of All-Party Groups All-party groups are regarded as relatively informal compared with other cross-party bodies such as select committees of the House. The membership of all-party groups mainly comprises backbench Members of the House of Commons and Lords but may also include ministers and non-parliamentarians. Groups flourish and wane according to the interests and enthusiasm of Members. Groups are classified either as subject groups (relating to a particular topic eg. forestry) or country groups (relating to a particular country or region). Most country groups are affiliated to the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association’s United Kingdom Branch and/or the Inter- Parliamentary Union’s British Group. Purpose and Form of the ‘Register of All-Party Groups’ The Register was set up in accordance with a Resolution made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and its main purpose is to record which all-party groups are recognised by the House; who their officers are; and what assistance groups receive from outside Parliament. Registration is compulsory for any group that includes Members of the Commons from more than one party and has at least one officer who is from the Commons. Each group’s Register entry shows its title, officers, financial and material assistance received from outside Parliament, and relevant gainful occupations of its staff. However, if a group is on the Approved List (see below) it has to provide additional information on its register entry, namely details of the group’s purpose; its 20 qualifying members; any affiliation it has to the Inter-Parliamentary Union or Commonwealth Parliamentary Association; its voting rights; and the date of its last Annual General Meeting. Purpose and Form of the ‘Approved List of All-Party Parliamentary Groups and Associate Parliamentary Groups’ The Approved List exists as a result of a Resolution made by the House of Commons in October 1984 and its main purpose is to control the extent to which groups use the House’s facilities and status. Whereas inclusion on the Register is compulsory for most groups, a group may choose whether or not to apply for inclusion on the Approved List. Most groups are on both. This is because it is only by being on the Approved List that a group gains certain entitlements (eg. use of the All- Party Notices to advertise meetings; use of the terms ‘All-Party’, ‘Associate’ and ‘Parliamentary’ in the group’s title; and priority over unlisted groups when booking meeting rooms in the Palace of Westminster). REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 4 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS In order to qualify for these entitlements approved groups are subject to more rules than unapproved groups. These are mainly to do with the way in which AGMs and other meetings are held and recorded, and about membership levels and party quotas. A group’s entry on the Approved List, as opposed to its entry in the Register, shows simply the group’s title and whether it is either an ‘All-Party Parliamentary Group’ or an ‘Associate Parliamentary Group’. The difference between the two terms is that in an All-Party Parliamentary Group only Members of the House of Commons or Lords have voting rights whereas an Associate Parliamentary Group additionally allows voting rights to persons who are neither. Administration of the Register and the Approved List The administration of the Register is overseen by the Committee on Standards and Privileges whereas the Administration Committee oversees the Approved List. Both the Register and the Approved List are, however, compiled and maintained by the Assistant Registrar in the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, whose address is: House of Commons, London SW1A OAA (tel: 020 7219 0401). To be included on the Register or on the Approved List a group must first complete the ‘Application Forms for Cross-Party Groups’. Once registered, the group is sent the ‘Guide to the Rules on All-Party Groups’, which sets out the rules on the day-to-day conduct of registered groups. Both documents are available from the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Office should you wish to know more about the rules governing groups. Once registered, groups are required to notify the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards of any change required to their Register entry within 28 days of such a change arising. When the Commons is sitting, an updated edition of the Register is published roughly every 6 weeks. An updated edition of the Approved List is produced very 1-2 weeks and is distributed to various departments within the Commons but is not published. When the Register is updated a new edition of it is published on the internet at www.parliament.uk (on the home page click on ‘Index’ then the letter ‘R’ then ‘Register of Interests’ then ‘Register of All-Party Groups’). A paper copy is made available for public inspection in the Committee Office of the House of Commons (please call 020 7219 4300 to make an appointment). A further copy is placed in the Oriel Room at the House of Commons where Members of either House may inspect it. Complaints Any suggestion that the requirement to register has not been met in a particular case should be made in writing to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA. In minor cases of infringement, the Commissioner may, at his discretion, apply the rectification procedure. Under this, a late entry is printed in bold italics in the Register for 12 months from its REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 5 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS first appearing. More major cases may be the subject of formal investigation and will be reported to the Committee on Standards and Privileges. REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 6 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS INDEX FOR COUNTRY GROUPS Page Afghanistan....................................................................................................................................9 Africa............................................................................................................................................10 Albania.........................................................................................................................................11 Algeria..........................................................................................................................................12 America........................................................................................................................................13 Angola ..........................................................................................................................................15 Argentina .....................................................................................................................................16 Armenia .......................................................................................................................................17 Assyria and the Assyrians ..........................................................................................................18 Australia and New Zealand........................................................................................................19 Austria..........................................................................................................................................20 Azerbaijan ...................................................................................................................................21 Bahrain.........................................................................................................................................22 Bangladesh...................................................................................................................................23 Belarus .........................................................................................................................................24 Belgium ........................................................................................................................................25 Belize ............................................................................................................................................26 Bermuda.......................................................................................................................................27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MS Annual Report Dec 05.Qxd
    December 2005 Parliamentary News Martin Salter’s Eighth Annual Report to Constituents Reading West Constituency – which includes: Pangbourne, Purley, Tilehurst, Theale, Calcot, Coley, Norcot, Southcote, Whitley and the Oxford Road Working for Reading West Since he was first elected as Member of Parliament in 1997 Martin Salter has established a reputation as a hard-working constituency MP who gets results for local people. Martin believes in keeping in touch with his constituents and produces an Annual Report setting out what he has been doing on your behalf during the last year. “ Dear Resident 2005 has been a year of triumphs and disasters. It began with the awful scenes of devastation from the Asian Tsunami which prompted a generous worldwide response in which the people of Reading played their part. We scarcely had time to enjoy the triumph of Britain winning the Olympics bid before the dreadful London bombings of 7th July. COMMUNITY CHAMPIONS – The Prime Minister asked Martin to invite two community workers to 10 Downing Street. Street warden Ahmed Abd-Eighany Obviously I was pleased to have been re-elected for the and Battle Library’s Marjorie McClure were thanked personally by Tony Blair for their hard work. third time in a row and in the constituency I’ve been as busy as ever: successfully fighting off plans to merge Calcot Infant and Junior Schools; winning extra funding for Salter Wins a Third Term Prospect College, Denefield, Brookfields and Long Lane Reading West MP, Martin Salter, was comfortably re- Primary Schools; helping get rid of the illegal travellers elected on May 5th to serve a third term in Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • New Books List October-December 2011
    New Books List October-December 2011 This catalogue of the Shakespeare First Folio (1623) is the result of two decades of research during which 232 surviving copies of this immeasurably important book were located – a remarkable 72 more than were recorded in the previous census over a century ago – and examined in situ, creating an essential reference work. ෮ Internationally renowned authors Eric Rasmussen, co-editor of the RSC Shakespeare series and Professor of English at the University of Nevada, Reno, USA; Anthony James West, Shakespeare scholar, focused on the history of the First Folio since it left the press. ෮ Full bibliographic descriptions of each extant copy, including detailed accounts of press variants, watermarks, damage or repair and provenance ෮ Fascinating stories about previous owners and incidents ෮ Striking Illustrations in a colour plate section ෮ User’s Guide and Indices for easy cross referencing ෮ Hugely significant resource for researchers into the history of the book, as well as auction houses, book collectors, curators and specialist book dealers November 2011 | Hardback | 978-0-230-51765-3 | £225.00 For more information, please visit: www.palgrave.com/reference Order securely online at www.palgrave.com or telephone +44 (0)1256 302866 fax + 44(0)1256 330688 email [email protected] Jellybeans © Andrew Johnson/istock.com New Books List October-December 2011 KEY TO SYMBOLS Title is, or New Title available Web resource as an ebook Textbook comes with, a available CD-ROM/DVD Contents Language and Linguistics 68 Anthropology
    [Show full text]
  • West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority
    WEST YORKSHIRE FIRE AND RESCUE AUTHORITY MEETING TO BE HELD ON FRIDAY 16 DECEMBER 2011 AT 10.30 A.M. IN THE TRAINING AND CONFERENCE SUITE, BIRKENSHAW AGENDA 1. CHAIRMAN’S ANNOUNCEMENTS 2. ADMISSION OF THE PUBLIC The Committee is asked to consider whether, by resolution, to exclude the public from the meeting during the items of business marked with an ‘E’ reference, because of the possibility of the disclosure of exempt information. 3. URGENT ITEMS To determine whether there are any additional items of business which, by reason of special circumstances, the Chair believes should be considered at the meeting. 4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To consider any Declaration of Interest in relation to any item of business on the agenda. 5. MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING HELD ON 9 SEPTEMBER 2011 (pp 3 - 8) (Enclosed) 6. MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 30 SEPTEMBER 2011 (pp 9 - 11) (Enclosed) 7. MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 31 OCTOBER 2011 (pp 12 - 14) (Enclosed) 8. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY SAFETY COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 4 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 15 - 21) (Enclosed) 9. MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 11 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 22 - 24) (Enclosed) 10. MINUTES OF THE FINANCE AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 25 - 28) (Enclosed) 11. LOCAL GOVERNMENT GROUP MINUTES (pp 29 - 51) a) Fire Commission - 14 October 2011 (p 29) b) Safer and Stronger Communities Programme Board - 13 September 2011 (p 36) c) Fire Services Management Committee - 16 September 2011 (p 45) - 17 November 2011 (Enclosed where available) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Granada Cinema, Victoria Public House and 186A and 186B Hoe
    Ms J Andrews Our Ref: APP/U5930/E/11/2165344 Howard Sharp and Partners LLP APP/U5930/A/11/2165348 125 High Street APP/U5930/A/12/2183662 Sevenoaks Kent Your ref: JEA/DS.7131 TN13 1UT 22 May 2013 Dear Madam TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 APPEALS BY THE INCORPORATED TRUSTEES OF THE UCKG HELPCENTRE THE FORMER GRANADA CINEMA, 186 HOE STREET, THE VICTORIA PUBLIC HOUSE AND 186a and 186b HOE STREET, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 4QH APPLICATION REFs: 2009/1049/LB, 2009/1048 and 2012/0764 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Paul Griffiths BSc(Hons) BArch IHBC, who held a public local inquiry between 29 November 2012 and 19 December 2012, into your client’s appeals against the refusal of the Council of the London Borough of Waltham Forest (“the Council”): Appeal A: to grant listed building consent for use of the former Granada Cinema, 186 Hoe Street, the Victoria Public House and 186a & 186b Hoe Street to include religious, community/assembly, café and retail uses (A1/A3/D1/D2) along with alterations and restoration of the Grade II* listed building, side and rear extensions, and associated plant, servicing and works; Appeal B: to grant planning permission for use of the former Granada Cinema, 186 Hoe Street, the Victoria Public House and 186a & 186b Hoe Street to include religious, community/assembly, café and retail uses (A1/A3/D1/D2) along with alterations and restoration of the Grade II* listed building, side and rear extensions, and associated plant, servicing and works; Appeal C: redevelopment proposals and associated alterations and works including change of use to mixed use development comprising religious, community, cinema, café and retail uses (D1/D2/A3/A1 Use Classes) with ancillary residential accommodation comprising two x 2 bed and three x 1 bed units.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabian Society
    SOS POLITICAL SCIENCE & PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION M.A POLITICAL SCIENCE II SEM POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: MODERN POLITICAL THOUGHT, THEORY & CONTEMPORARY IDEOLOGIES UNIT-III Topic Name-fabian socialism WHAT IS MEANT BY FABIAN SOCIALISM? • The Fabian Society is a British socialistorganisation whose purpose is to advance the principles of democratic socialism via gradualist and reformist effort in democracies, rather than by revolutionary overthrow WHO STARTED THE FABIAN SOCIETY? • Its nine founding members were Frank Podmore, Edward R. Pease, William Clarke, Hubert Bland, Percival Chubb, Frederick Keddell, H. H. Champion, Edith Nesbit, and Rosamund Dale Owen. WHO IS THE PROPOUNDER OF FABIAN SOCIALISM? • In the period between the two World Wars, the "Second Generation" Fabians, including the writers R. H. Tawney, G. D. H. Cole and Harold Laski, continued to be a major influence on socialistthought. But the general idea is that each man should have power according to his knowledge and capacity. WHAT IS THE FABIAN POLICY? • The Fabian strategy is a military strategy where pitched battles and frontal assaults are avoided in favor of wearing down an opponent through a war of attrition and indirection. While avoiding decisive battles, the side employing this strategy harasses its enemy through skirmishes to cause attrition, disrupt supply and affect morale. Employment of this strategy implies that the side adopting this strategy believes time is on its side, but it may also be adopted when no feasible alternative strategy can be devised. HISTORY • This
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Harry Cohen
    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Harry Cohen Seventh Report of Session 2009–10 HC 310 House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Mr Harry Cohen Seventh Report of Session 2009–10 Report and Appendices, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 19 January 2009 HC 310 Published on 22 January 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards and Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt hon Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP (Conservative, Kensington & Chelsea) (Chairman) Rt hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Rt hon Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Mr Paddy Tipping MP (Labour, Sherwood) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Future
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Governing the Future Second Report of Session 2006–07 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 22 February 2007 HC 123-I Published on 6 March 2007 [Incorporating HC 756-i-v, Session 2005-06] by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, of the Health Service Commissioners for England, Scotland and Wales and of the Parliamentary Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Dr Tony Wright MP (Labour, Cannock Chase) (Chairman) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield Southgate) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mr Ian Liddell-Grainger MP (Conservative, Bridgewater) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Julie Morgan MP (Labour, Cardiff North) Mr Gordon Prentice MP (Labour, Pendle) Paul Rowen MP (Liberal Democrats, Rochdale) Grant Shapps MP (Conservative, Welwyn Hatfield) Jenny Willott MP (Liberal Democrats, Cardiff Central) The following Member was also a member of the Committee for part of this inquiry: Julia Goldsworthy MP (Liberal Democrats, Falmouth and Cambourne) Powers The Committee is one of the select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Martin Salter - Curriculum Vitae Tilehurst, Reading, Berkshire Email: [email protected] Profile A highly successful campaigner and political strategist with over 30 years experience in the Trade Union movement, local government and national politics. An excellent communicator with strong media links. A tough and effective political organiser with the ability to develop and translate policy objectives to the wider public. Experience • Organising and winning elections in highly marginal political situations. • Developing local and national campaign strategies • Planning and delivering effective media campaigns • Thirteen years as a Member of Parliament working closely with ministers on political strategy and policy development. • Twelve years in local government helping to lead one of the most successful councils in the UK. • Leading community - based projects and managing staff and budgets. • Campaigning with NGOs to effect change at a national level. • Senior roles on Parliamentary Select Committees and legislative scrutiny. • Inspiring and motivating team members and colleagues. • Writing, proofing and editing publications, news releases and speeches • Event planning and organisation. • Crisis management and problem solving. Career Summary 1997 to 2010 - Labour MP for Reading West Elected on three occasions, securing one of the largest swings to Labour in the UK. Became an effective and respected senior backbencher with national roles in campaigning and policy development. Appointed Vice Chair (Environment) of the Labour Party in 2007 (see Political Biography for more details). 1984-96 - Reading Borough Councillor Became Chair of the Leisure Committee in 1986 and Deputy Leader from 1987. Overhauled leisure, recreation and community services and brought major music festivals to Reading. Helped plan the successful development of the town centre and steered Labour to unprecedented local electoral success.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic UN Vote to Ban Nuclear Weapons
    Yorkshire CND Issue 90 Action for Peace Winter 2016/7 he Yorkshire CND Newsletter Historic UN Vote to Ban Nuclear Weapons It was relatively easy to miss in the UK press, the The main body of opposition to the proposal came from exciting news that on 27 October, the UN General Russia, NATO states, and those heavily inluenced by Assembly's Disarmament and Security Committee voted NATO states. While India and Pakistan abstained, North for negotiations in 2017 on a treaty to prohibit nuclear Korea voted for the ban treaty negotiations, highlighting weapons. This clearly has momentous consequences very clearly, the countries that pose the greatest nuclear for Trident renewal, and ofers the best hope for threat to the world! disarmament campaigners for many years. The following analysis from an article by Rebecca 123 UN Member states (a huge majority) voted to Johnson of ICANuk underlines the importance of this convene a multilateral UN conference in 2017 "to vote. negotiate a legally binding treaty to prohibit nuclear ‘Building on the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), weapons, leading towards their total elimination". the new multilateral treaty will for the irst time provide a comprehensive approach to prohibiting activities such as the use, deployment, production, transporting, stockpiling and inancing of nuclear weapons. It will also extend the NPT's nuclear disarmament obligation by creating a clear, unequivocal legal obligation to eliminate existing arsenals that will apply to non-NPT as well as all NPT states. If the UN First Committee vote is conirmed by the UN General Assembly in December, as is likely, the negotiations will go ahead, with sessions timetabled for March, June and July 2017 in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: American and British Policy Concerning the Cyprus Issue: 1952-1974
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLICY CONCERNING THE CYPRUS ISSUE: 1952-1974 Michael M. Carver A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Gary R. Hess ii ABSTRACT Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor This study examines the role of both the United States and Great Britain during a series of crises that plagued Cyprus from the mid 1950s until the 1974 invasion by Turkey that led to the takeover of approximately one-third of the island and its partition. Initially an ancient Greek colony, Cyprus was conquered by the Ottoman Empire in the late 16th century, which allowed the native peoples to take part in the island’s governance. But the idea of Cyprus’ reunification with the Greek mainland, known as enosis, remained a significant tenet to most Greek-Cypriots. The movement to make enosis a reality gained strength following the island’s occupation in 1878 by Great Britain. Cyprus was integrated into the British imperialist agenda until the end of the Second World War when American and Soviet hegemony supplanted European colonialism. Beginning in 1955, Cyprus became a battleground between British officials and terrorists of the pro-enosis EOKA group until 1959 when the independence of Cyprus was negotiated between Britain and the governments of Greece and Turkey. The United States remained largely absent during this period, but during the 1960s and 1970s came to play an increasingly assertive role whenever intercommunal fighting between the Greek and Turkish-Cypriot populations threatened to spill over into Greece and Turkey, and endanger the southeastern flank of NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation 25 Consultation
    Regulation 25 Consultation Technical & Public Consultation Summary August 2009 Greater Norwich Development Partnership Regulation 25 Consultation 233902 BNI NOR 1 A PIMS 233902BN01/Report 14 August 2009 Technical & Public Consultation Summary August 2009 Greater Norwich Development Partnership Regulation 25 Consultation Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 03.08.09 Needee Myers Draft Report B 15.08.09 Needee Myers Emma Taylor Eddie Tyrer Final Report This document has been prepared for the titled project or Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used document to any party other than the person by whom it was for any other project without an independent check being commissioned. carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no To the extent that this report is based on information supplied responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald in preparing this report. Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Regulation 25 Consultation Content Chapter Title Page 1.
    [Show full text]