DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY of South San Francisco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITY of South San Francisco CITY OF South San Francisco URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN Someone is sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago.” WARREN BUFFET CITY OF South San Francisco URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN Prepared for: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 Grand Ave South San Francisco, CA 94080 Prepared by: DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP, INC. 1500 North Mantua Street, Kent, OH 44240 www.daveyresourcegroup.com Acknowledgements SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY STAFF AND DEPARTMENTS CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION MAYOR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Garbarino DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND VICE MAYOR: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Mark Addiego FIRE COUNCIL MEMBERS: Karyl Matsumoto, DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP, INC. Mark Nagales, Buenaflor Nicolas THANKS FOR GUIDANCE FROM PARKS AND RECREATION FRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST. COMMISSION SPECIAL THANKS TO COMMUNITY PARTICIPANTS. PHOTO CREDITS CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP, INC. Table of Contents Executive Summary What Do We Have? What do we want? 11 WHAT DO WE HAVE? 22 HISTORY OF URBAN FORESTRY 51 MANAGING PARTNERS 12 WHAT DO WE WANT? IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 52 COMMUNITY MEETING 12 HOW DO WE GET THERE? 23 John and Tina Previti 52 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING 12 HOW ARE WE DOING? 24 MICROCLIMATES 53 ONLINE SURVEY 25 CLIMATE CHANGE Introduction 58 FOCUS AREAS AND PLAN GOALS 31 URBAN FOREST RESOURCE 14 COMMUNITY 58 Focus Area: Align urban forest management policy with Tree Canopy South San Francisco History community expectations and cost efficiency Priority Planting 15 VISION STATEMENT Community Tree Resource 59 Focus Area: Enhance community safety 16 TREE AND CANOPY BENEFITS 35 URBAN FORESTRY OPERATIONS Air Quality Improvements 59 Focus Area: Optimize the environmental, social, Services Carbon Dioxide Reductions economic, and public health benefits of trees Tree Care Equipment Water Quality Improvements and canopy Tree Inventory Management Energy Savings Pest Management 60 Focus Area: Grow, maintain, preserve, and enhance Health Benefits Safety a sustainable urban forest Wildlife Habitat Community Engagement and Outreach Wind Protection Sign Hill Calculating Tree Benefits Funding How do we get there? Interdepartmental Coordination 62 Focus Area: Align urban forest management policy with Community Partnerships community expectations and cost efficiency Development 68 Focus Area: Enhance community safety 47 POLICIES AND REGULATION 72 Focus Area: Optimize the environmental, social, Federal and State Law economic, and public health benefits of trees South San Francisco Municipal Code and canopy City Of South San Francisco General Plan City Of South San Francisco Climate Action Plan 81 Focus Area: Grow, maintain, preserve, and enhance a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) sustainable urban forest 49 TREE CARE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY How are we doing? 49 CONCLUSIONS 86 MONITORING Annual Plan Review Resource Analysis Canopy Analysis Community Satisfaction 86 REPORTING State of the Community Forest Report Table of Contents Appendices Figures Maps 87 APPENDIX A: Acronyms 33 FIGURE 1: Most Prevalent Species In South San Francisco 24 MAP 1: Climate Zone Map 89 APPENDIX B: References 44 FIGURE 2: South San Francisco 2018-2019 Budget 27 MAP 2: Land Cover Summary 91 APPENDIX C: Industry Standards 53 FIGURE 3: Responses to “Trees are important to the 28 MAP 3: South San Francisco Parks 91 ANSI Z133 SAFETY STANDARD, 2017 quality of life in South San Francisco”? 29 MAP 4: South San Francisco Zones 91 ANSI A300 53 FIGURE 4: Responses to “Are there enough trees in South 30 MAP 5: Planting Priority Best Management Practices (BMPs) San Francisco”? 31 MAP 6: South San Francisco Inventoried Trees 92 APPENDIX D: Online Community Survey Results 53 FIGURE 5: Responses to “Where would you like to see 101 APPENDIX E: Soil Volume and Tree Stature more trees planted”? Tables 101 APPENDIX F: Alternative Planter Designs 54 FIGURE 6: Responses to “What Canopy Goal Should 13 TABLE 1: Summary of Goals and Existing Policies 104 APPENDIX G: Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators South San Francisco Adopt”? of the Plan 108 APPENDIX H: South San Francisco Goals and Objective 54 FIGURE 7: “Which benefits provided by trees do you Gantt Chart value most? Please select the top three benefits”. 54 FIGURE 8: “Describe your awareness and/or interactions with South San Francisco’s urban forest program. Please check all that apply”. 54 FIGURE 9: “What level of care for public trees would you prefer”? 55 FIGURE 10: “Should the City require professional licensing for tree care providers”? 55 FIGURE 11: “Would you support a higher penalty for unpermitted removals”? 55 FIGURE 12: “What topic about trees interest you? Please select your top three (3)”? 55 FIGURE 13: “What education topics about trees interest you? Please select your top three (3)”. 56 FIGURE 14: “What volunteer/collaborative efforts interest you most? Please select all that apply”. 56 FIGURE 15: “What is your age”? 56 FIGURE 16: “What neighborhood do you live in”? Scope & Purpose The Urban Forest Master Plan (UFMP) serves as a guide for The UFMP includes short-term actions and long-range planning managing, enhancing, and growing South San Francisco’s urban goals to promote sustainability, species diversity, and greater forest and the community tree resource over the next 20 years. canopy cover. The UFMP suggests reasonable time frames Whereas the urban forest includes all of the trees and woody for achieving goals, based on available resources and shrubs in South San Francisco, the community tree resource community support. is comprised of publicly managed trees along streets, in parks, and at City facilities. While the UFMP is primarily focused on the stewardship of the community tree resource, the Plan also considers private trees because they contribute significantly to South San Francisco’s livability and environmental quality. In summary, the UFMP aims to: • Recognize best management practices that promote tree health, maximum benefits, and community safety • Promote community outreach, engagement, and advocacy South San Francisco has been for the urban forest recognized as a Tree City USA for 32 years.” • Develop a more cohesive organizational structure to facilitate collaboration among all departments and staff who impact or affect the urban forest • Nurture an ethic of stewardship for the urban forest among City Staff, community organizations, businesses, and residents • Increase health and resiliency in the urban forest by improving species diversity, and by managing pests and invasive species • Identify baseline metrics and clear goals for urban forest managers 8 Scope and Purpose 9 Executive Summary South San Francisco’s community urban forest includes an The plan development process for the UFMP involved a estimated 15,000 public-managed trees along streets and medians, comprehensive review and assessment of the existing urban forest in parks and open space, and around City facilities. Along with resource, which included composition, value, and environmental their aesthetic contribution, these trees provide valuable and benefits. The process explored community values and vision, critical services to the community including benefits to air quality, including those expressed in guiding documents such as the water quality, stormwater management, energy savings, wildlife General Plan 2040, the Climate Action Plan, City Ordinance, state habitat, and socioeconomics. The Urban Forest Master Plan law, and other regulatory and policy documents. (UFMP) is a road map which provides long-term management goals and timelines to effectively preserve and enhance the The process also evaluated funding and the current service levels environmental benefits provided by this critical component of for both in-house and contracted tree crews. In addition to Parks infrastructure. staff, there are multiple stakeholders, internal and external, who play a role in the planning, design, care, and advocacy of The UFMP’s structure is based on the understanding of what we the urban forest. These stakeholders include City departments, have, what we want, how we get there, and how we are doing. This utility providers, nonprofit organizations, Parks and Recreation structure, known as adaptive management, is commonly used for commission, and community members. Each of these stakeholders resource planning and management (Miller, 1988) and provides a played a role and provided input for the development of this plan. conceptual framework for the process of improving urban forest management. WHAT DO WE HAVE? People don’t remember each tree in a park but all of us benefit from the trees.” HOW ARE WHAT DO WE DOING? WE WANT? YOKO ONO HOW DO WE GET THERE? 10 Executive Summary WHAT DO WE HAVE? South San Francisco’s Urban Forest Benchmark Values The review process identified challenges facing the urban forest, most notably, climate change. The predominate impact of climate Community Urban Forest (Public Tree Resource) change on the urban forest is the effect on tree species that Inventoried trees (2018) 10,831 trees and 1,505 vacant sites historically have been successful in the region but now, with rising temperatures and more extreme periods of drought, may no longer Estimated non-inventoried trees 4,000 trees thrive in the changing environment. Species Diversity (Inventoried Trees, 2018) In addition to climate change, the City is still recovering from a Total number of unique species 165 financial crisis in the late 2000s. The financial crisis prompted a Prevalence of top ten species 60.4% hiring freeze, resulting in numerous vacant positions as staff retired or left the City. More specifically, the tree crews were reduced by Species exceeding recommended 10% 1 a third. Currently, tree care is highly reactive, and as a result, Urban Tree Canopy Cover (Public and Private, 2016) not all trees are receiving adequate care. Overall canopy cover 7.2% Despite challenges, the City has numerous opportunities to Overall canopy cover (excluding open water) 8.7% expand the urban forest. As identified by an Urban Tree Canopy Assessment, the City currently has 8.7% canopy cover, but has Impervious surfaces 58.2% the potential to achieve 22.6%.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Gardener AUGUST 2020 FINAL
    Do worms make New EGO Autumn is the new good compost? chainsaw Spring! page 19 page 3 page 11 Local Gardener The UK’s only newspaper for Gardeners National allotment week! P22 P10 Green-tech has you covered! Cobra has once again It is self-propelled, has four With four speeds, a generous petrol engine that utilises the the need to pull the recoil and The mower has a expanded its range of speeds and also has the 21” cutting width and a latest technology to ensure makes starting even easier. recommended retail price of lawnmowers with the option for both mulching and grassbag with a 65-litre optimal torque and £400.00 introduction of the new side discharge to dispose of capacity it is designed for efficiency. Cobra products are available MX534SPCE mower. cuttings. medium to large gardens, up to buy online at An optional swing tip blade to approximately 600 m2. It also features an electric www.cobragarden.co.uk or is available to use with the It is a 21” petrol powered This multi-feature mower is starting system to ease via a network of expert Cobra MX534SPCE mower that combines many the ultimate in power, style It features a quiet yet starting the petrol engine. dealers across the UK. Lawnmower. The 4 bladed top-of-range features. and reliability in the garden. powerful 4-stroke Cobra The electric button replaces swing tip system can be P2 P18 August 2020 online at www.localgardener.org August 2020 Local Gardener How to contact us at the editorial office: How to take out an advertisement Phone 07984 11 2537 email [email protected] Phone 07984 11 2537 email [email protected] Write to Local Gardener Newspaper, Kemp House, 152-160 City Rd, London EC1V 2NX Write to Local Gardener Newspaper, Kemp House, 152-160 City Rd, London EC1V 2NX FRONT PAGE GREENMECH INTRODUCE NEW EVO 165P SUB-750 used for a more efficient cut.
    [Show full text]
  • FRIENDLY FIRE by Steve Pyne § the Warm Fire Started from a Lightning
    FRIENDLY FIRE by Steve Pyne § The Warm fire started from a lightning strike on June 8, 2006 a few miles south of Jacob Lake, between Highway 67 and Warm Springs (which gave the fire its name) and could easily have been extinguished with a canteen and a shovel. The North Kaibab instead declared it a Wildland Fire Use fire, and was delighted. Previous efforts with WFUs had occurred during the summer storm season and had yielded small, low-intensity burns that “did not produce desired effects.” The district had committed to boosting its burned acres and had engineered personnel transfers to make that happen. Since large fires historically occurred in the run-up to the summer monsoon season, when conditions were maximally hot, dry, and windy, the Warm fire promised to rack up the desired acres.1 For three days the fire behaved as hoped. On June 11 the district decided to request a Fire Use Management Team to help run the fire, which was now over a hundred acres and blowing smoke across the sole road to the North Rim, and so required ferrying vehicles under convoy. On June 13 the FUMT assumed command of the fire. Briefings included a warning that the fire could not be allowed to enter a region to the southeast which was a critical habitat for the Mexican spotted owl. The “maximum management area” allotted for the fire was 4,000 acres. That day the fire spotted across the highway, outside the prescribed zone. The FUMT and district ranger decided to seize the opportunity to allow the fire to grow and get some “bonus acres.” The prescribed zone was increased; then increased again as the fire, now almost 7,000 acres, crossed Forest Road 225, another prescribed border.
    [Show full text]
  • NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management PMS 902 April 2021 NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management April 2021 PMS 902 The NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management, assists participating agencies of the NWCG to constructively work together to provide effective execution of each agency’s incident business management program by establishing procedures for: • Uniform application of regulations on the use of human resources, including classification, payroll, commissary, injury compensation, and travel. • Acquisition of necessary equipment and supplies from appropriate sources in accordance with applicable procurement regulations. • Management and tracking of government property. • Financial coordination with the jurisdictional agency and maintenance of finance, property, procurement, and personnel records, and forms. • Use and coordination of incident business management functions as they relate to sharing of resources among federal, state, and local agencies, including the military. • Documentation and reporting of claims. • Documentation of costs and cost management practices. • Administrative processes for all-hazards incidents. Uniform application of interagency incident business management standards is critical to successful interagency fire operations. These standards must be kept current and made available to incident and agency personnel. Changes to these standards may be proposed by any agency for a variety of reasons: new law or regulation, legal interpretation or opinion, clarification of meaning, etc. If the proposed change is relevant to the other agencies, the proponent agency should first obtain national headquarters’ review and concurrence before forwarding to the NWCG Incident Business Committee (IBC). IBC will prepare draft NWCG amendments for all agencies to review before finalizing and distributing.
    [Show full text]
  • The West Australian Woodchip Industry Ha Chip
    THE WEST AUSTRALIAN WOODCHIP INDUSTRY HA CHIP & PULP CO PTY LTD Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Hestern Australia Bulletin 329 July 1988 ISBN 0 7309 1828 9 ISSN 1030-0120 CONTENTS Page i SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS iii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. .BACKGROUND . 1 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 3 4. PUBLIC REVIEW 7 5. REVIEW OF CURRENT WOODCHIPPING OPERATIONS 7 5.1 EARLIER PREDICTIONS OF UlPACT 7 5.2 SUHHARY OF RESEARCH 10 5.3 REVIEW OF INVESTIGATIONS . 11 6. ASSESSHENT OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 12 6.1 INTRODUCTION . 12 6.2 PROVISION OF \olOODCHIP RESOURCE 14 6.2.1 INTEGRATED HARVESTING IN STATE FOREST 14 6.2.2 THINNINGS FRml STATE FOREST 25 6.2.3 \olOODCHIPPING OF SAIVMILL RESIDUES . 25 6.2.4 PLANTATIONS ESTABLISHED ON CLEARED PRIVATE PROPERTY 26 6.2.5 CLEARING OF RE~INANT NATIVE VEGETATION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY 27 6.3 \olOODCHIP PRODUCTION AND EXPORT 30 6.4 DURATION OF STATE APPROVALS 31 7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING 31 8. CONFLICT RESOLUTION 34 9. CONCLUSIONS 34 10. REFERENCES 36 11. GLOSSARY . 38 APPENDICES 1. Summary of Issues Raised in Submissions on the ERHP/draft EIS . .. ...... 44 2. List of Publications on the Forests of South \olestern Australia 66 3. List of Commitments made by WA Chip & Pulp Co. Pty Ltd in the Supplement to the ERHP . 85 i FIGURES Page 1. The Current Woodchip Licence Area 39 2. Projected Chiplog Sources from State Forest 1987-2009 40 3. HACAP's Sources of Chiplogs and Hoodchips 1975-2005 41 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Plantation-Forestry-Sector-In-Mozambique-Community-Involvement-And-Jobs.Pdf
    JOBS WORKING PAPER Issue No. 30 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Plantation Forestry Sector In Mozambique: Community Involvement And Jobs Public Disclosure Authorized Leonor Serzedelo de Almeida Christopher Delgado Public Disclosure Authorized S WORKA global partnership to create private sector jobs LET’ more & better THE PLANTATION FORESTRY SECTOR IN MOZAMBIQUE: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND JOBS Leonor Serzedelo de Almeida Christopher Delgado The Let’s Work Partnership in Mozambique is made possible through a grant from the World Bank’s Jobs Umbrella Trust Fund, which is supported by the Department for International Development/UK AID, and the Governments of Norway, Germany, Austria, the Austrian Development Agency, and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA. Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org. Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • ST6 Woodchipper
    PT8 Woodchipper USER MANUAL ENGLISH 26/11/2018 Revision 1 Redwood Global Ltd, Unit 86, Livingstone Road, Walworth Business Park, Andover, Hampshire. SP10 5NS. United Kingdom P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of machine .............................................................................................................. 4 Exterior component identification .......................................................................................... 5 Safety ................................................................................................................................... 6 Safe working...................................................................................................................... 6 Machine lifting ................................................................................................................... 7 DOs and DON’Ts .............................................................................................................. 8 Noise test information ........................................................................................................... 9 Machine operation .............................................................................................................. 10 Machine control panel, start/stop & operating settings ..................................................... 11 Feed speed adjustment ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Hour Add. Hour 1St Day 2Nd Day Add. Day AIR COMPRESSORS 8CFM Elec. Portable Sm. $15.00 $5.00 $35.00 $25.00 $15.00 17CFM Gas Lg
    1st Hour Add. Hour 1st Day 2nd Day Add. Day AIR COMPRESSORS 8CFM Elec. Portable Sm. $15.00 $5.00 $35.00 $25.00 $15.00 17CFM Gas Lg. $20.00 $10.00 $60.00 $40.00 $20.00 200CFM Diesel Towable $50.00 $19.00 $125.00 $95.00 $65.00 AIR TOOLS AND HOSES 35 lb. Air Hammer $30.00 $7.50 $60.00 $45.00 $30.00 60 lb. Air Hammer $30.00 $7.50 $60.00 $45.00 $30.00 90 lb. Air Hammer $30.00 $7.50 $60.00 $45.00 $30.00 Texture Gun $10.00 $5.00 $30.00 $22.00 $15.00 Glitter Gun Hand - - - - $10.00 $5.00 $2.50 Frame Nailer Air $15.00 $3.75 $30.00 $23.00 $15.00 Sheating Stapler Air $15.00 $3.75 $30.00 $23.00 $15.00 Finish Nailer Air $15.00 $3.75 $30.00 $23.00 $15.00 Brad Nailer $15.00 $3.75 $30.00 $23.00 $15.00 Roof Nailer Air $15.00 $3.75 $30.00 $23.00 $15.00 Air Tank $5.00 $3.00 $17.00 $13.00 $8.00 Air Hose 3/4" 50' - - - - $8.00 $4.00 $2.00 Air Hose 3/8" 50' - - - - $5.00 $2.00 $1.00 APPLIANCE DOLLIES/MOVING EQUIPMENT Appliance Dolly $6.00 $3.00 $18.00 $13.00 $8.00 Appliance Dolly HD $8.00 $3.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 Piano Dolly Upright $8.00 $4.00 $25.00 $15.00 $10.00 Piano Dolly 2 pc.
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County 2020 Hazard Mitigation Plan Volume II
    Snohomish County 2020 Hazard Mitigation Plan Volume II September 2020 Prepared for: 3000 Rockefeller Avenue Everett, WA 98201 Prepared by: Ecology & Environment, Inc. 333 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 608 Portland, OR 97204 View the Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan online at: https://snohomishcountywa.gov/2429/Hazard-Mitigation-Plan SNOHOMISH COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, VOLUME 2 | 2020 UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents 1 Planning Partner Participation ........................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Planning Partnership .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Initial Solicitation and Letters of Intent ................................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Planning Partner Expectations .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Annex Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Templates .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Workshops ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Hazard Probability, Exposure, and Vulnerability
    [Show full text]
  • Corvus Review: Fall 2015 Company
    [TYPE THE CORVUS REVIEW: FALL 2015 COMPANY NAME] CONTENTS Belle 78 Kopp 84 Editorial 3 Deeren 95 Cover Art/Editor Bio’s 4 Parrish 98 Kratz 101 PROSE Soto 105 Cairns 107 Silver 5 Carlton 119 Davis 17 Ferrell 122 Half-Pillow 21 Wall 124 McNulty 29 Kane 126 Phillips 35 Bensoussan 134 Laing 38 Campbell 137 Duquette 47 Roberts 139 Dukowitz 54 Rank 156 Sheehan 66 Price 77, 89 POETRY George 185 Sears 163 Prihoda 187 Ahern 164 Mydosh 191 Plath 165 Garcia-Bassier 194 Hamilton 167 Corey 195 Ingram 168 Semtex 197 Garrett 169 Plenefisch 199 Pearce 170 Gregg 201 Davis, J 172 Brownstein 203 Grey 173 Scharwath 205 Kanev 175 Bacher 207 Beck 177 Vince 208 Burt 179 Soricelli 210 Demaree 181 Roth 212 Boucheron 182 Haynes 214 Kushner 183 Johnson 216 Del Col Brown 184 3 EDITORIAL Dear Reader, With pleasure, I present the Fall issue of Corvus Review. This is our largest issue to date, over 200 pages of quality work, and I couldn’t be prouder. Each piece offers a glimpse into each writer’s mind. You might like what you see and you might not, but I challenge you, dear reader, to peruse this issue to its end. For this issue, I opened the door to new editors. Andy Tu and Luciana Fitzgerald generously gave of their time and expertise and, as a whole, I feel allowing them into Corvus’ inner sanctum proved most productive. Special thanks to them for their help sorting out the bones. When I began this little lit journal around this time last year, I never imagined it would reach so many.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utah Statesman, December 6, 2010
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU The Utah Statesman Students 12-6-2010 The Utah Statesman, December 6, 2010 Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/newspapers Recommended Citation Utah State University, "The Utah Statesman, December 6, 2010" (2010). The Utah Statesman. 211. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/newspapers/211 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Students at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Utah Statesman by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Monday, Dec. 6, 2010 UtahThe Campus Voice tatesman SUtah State University • Logan, Utah • www.utahstatesman.com since 1902 Students and ASUSU leaders examine necessity of new international position By ROB JEPSON and JESSICA SWEAT the past 15 years. difference I see is entirely different cul- staff writers “The focus of ASUSU tends to fall tures. An African student from Ghana with American minorities and overshad- is entirely different than an African International Student Council (ISC) ows the international students,” Orr American student from say, New York.” president Christian Orr submitted said. “My intention is to create the unity Crosby also said they were worried a bill to the ASUSU Executive Coun- that we have lacked.” that creating a new vice president posi- cil (ASUSUEC) on Nov. 16 proposing tion would encourage other groups to the creation of an international vice Diverse vs. international also petition for vice presidential posi- president position. The council voted to tions. rewrite the bill, changing the proposal Orr, who was elected ISC president Anthony “T.J.” Pratt, who is a mem- from a full member to an ex-officio, or in September, said he feels there is a ber of the ASUSU Diversity Council and non-voting position.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 Pro¡Ects Budset Requests 77/T8l2o2o
    2021-2022 Pro¡ects Budset Requests 77/t8l2O2O Proiects 26-27 Hishwav 22-23 1) Rt 132 reclaim, pave 1 mile Tw¡n state sand & Gravel budget est¡mãte 2) Beaver Meadow Roåd - Reclaim, Peve Sloo,ooo lncludes s¡dewalk, curb, dra¡nage issues Ma¡n st. to Brieham Hill Rd 4000' eng¡neêr¡ng phase T Mgr scheduled 22-23 3) Beaver Meadow Road - Reclaim, Pave 5431,s00 lncludes sidewalk, curb, dra¡nage ¡ssues Main st, to Br¡gham H¡ll Rd 4000' construction phase T Mgr scheduled 22-23 Twin State est¡mate 4) Beaver Meadow Road - Shim & overlay 5317,000 from Bricham Hill Road 2.5 miles 5) Beaver Meadow Road - shim & Overlay S248,ooo from previous ehd to Sharon townline 6) Pave steep hills cufiently gravel s2s0,000 Tucker Hill Rd, Tilden H¡ll Rd, Blood Hill East Dutton Bowen q411.sfi) s2so-fl)o Sub Total s100.000 3317.0oo s248.000 Bridses 21-22 22-23 7) Bridge lnventory of all bridges/culverts >5' SsT,ooo cost for - Stantec estimate 8) T¡gertown Box Culvert s487,643 e) Rt 132 Br¡dge - construction Stantec estimate - concrete box culvert Vtrans Structures Grãnt Application 10) Chapel H¡ll South Bridge - âbutment repair S36,ooo 11) Elm st. Bridge - design s100,000 12) Elm St, Bridge - construction ss00,00c 13) Beaver tMeadow Road Eridge No. 39 - des¡8n s1s0,000 14) Beaver Meadow Road Bridge No, 39-construction SToo,ooo s36.(x)0 s100.000 ssoo,0o0 s150-OOO s700.000 2627 Euild¡nss & Grounds 23-24 15) Tracy Hall generator replacement S49,o9s 16) Public Works Dept generator replacement s7,67t 17) Tracy Hall underground fuel storâge tank replacement s60,ooo 18) Tracy Hall bo¡ler replacement Sls,ooo 19) Public Works Garage - creãte aggregate storage bins ss,ooo 108 concrete 20) Public Works Garage - break room appurtenances fransfer Station 21) Transfer Statìon building s0 Sub Total s7s,00c So 50 s0 s1,167,409 $211,000 5s31,s00 s817,000 s398,0q) s950,0(X) Detailed Capital Budget Request Form 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Were Failures (1) to Wear Leg Protection While Operating Chainsaws, (2) to Use Protective Eyewear During Tree Removal, Tree
    United States of America OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036-3457 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. OSHRC DOCKET No. 16-2022 TONY WATSON, d/b/a Countryside Tree Service, Respondent. APPEARANCES: For the Complainant: Terrence Duncan, Esq. Office of the Solicitor U.S. Department of Labor New York, New York For the Respondent: William Fanciullo, Esq. Fanciullo Law Firm Slingerlands, New York BEFORE: William S. Coleman Administrative Law Judge DECISION AND ORDER Countryside Tree Service is a sole proprietorship of the Respondent, Mr. Tony Watson, that is engaged in the tree service business in Schenectady, New York. On May 4, 2016, a five- person crew that Watson led was removing trees in a residential area when a new employee – his first day on the job in the tree service industry – got ensnared in the Respondent’s woodchipper1 and was killed. Officials from the Albany area office of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an inspection and investigation, after which on November 2, 2016, OSHA issued the Respondent a one-item willful citation and a four-item serious citation. OSHA proposed the then maximum permissible penalty for the willful citation of $124,709, and proposed penalties totaling $17,102 for the four serious citation items. The willful citation alleged that on the day of the fatality the Respondent violated section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678 (the Act). Section 5(a)(1) is commonly known as the “general duty clause” and requires that each employer “furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.” 29 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]