LGBTQIA+ Student Identity and Introductory Film Studies Curriculum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LGBTQIA+ Student Identity and Introductory Film Studies Curriculum O’BRIEN, STEPHANIE P., Ph.D. The Kids are not all Right: LGBTQIA+ Student Identity and Introductory Film Studies Curriculum. (2020) Directed by Dr. Leila Villaverde. 239 pp. In attempting to address a broad range of students, introductory film studies curriculum serves to reinforce the marginalization of certain student identities that do not conform to hegemonic ideals reinforced through traditional, canonical analysis. In this study, I argue that marginalized students perform José Esteban Muñoz’s disidentification as a way to move through the traditional curriculum. Through a multi-method approach that includes content analysis, critical discourse analysis, and comparative analysis, this dissertation considers the organizational structure, language, and examples used in five mass-market, introductory film studies textbooks. The study revealed four cartographic rules of knowledge construction that guide introductory film studies curriculum. These cartographic rules illuminate how traditional, canonical, introductory film studies curriculum privileges western, white, patriarchal, heteronormative ideologies within critical film literacy. A reconsideration of the traditional, canonical approach is needed in order to provide a more inclusive and interdisciplinary curriculum. I posit a revision of the traditional, canonical view that, rather than privileging the filmmaker and filmic text as eminent maker of meaning, focuses instead on individual student meaning-making. Lastly, I provide examples, readings, and activities that move toward a more inclusive, student-centered curriculum. THE KIDS ARE NOT ALL RIGHT: LGBTQIA+ STUDENT IDENTITY AND INTRODUCTORY FILM STUDIES CURRICULUM by Stephanie P. O’Brien A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2020 Approved by _________________________________ Committee Chair APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation written by Stephanie P. O’Brien has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Committee Chair ___________________________________ Leila Villaverde Committee Members ___________________________________ Silvia Bettez ___________________________________ Danielle Bouchard ____________________________ Date of Acceptance by Committee __________________________ Date of Final Oral Examination ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This journey would not have been possible without the help of dedicated mentors, colleagues, family, and friends. I am grateful for their support. Dr. Leila Villaverde provided the valuable guidance I needed throughout my doctoral studies and this process. To my committee members, Drs. Silvia Bettez, Danielle Bouchard, and Laura Meadows, thank you for your continued support and advice. I could not have completed this journey without the encouragement of my spouse, Jennifer. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER I. CONTEXTUAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................. 1 An Unexpected Discovery ........................................................................ 6 Looking for Dorothy ................................................................................ 7 Teaching Film History and Aesthetics .................................................... 12 Research Questions ................................................................................ 19 II. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................. 23 A Note on Theory................................................................................... 23 Intersections of Theory ........................................................................... 28 The Politics of Identity ........................................................................... 30 Disidentification ......................................................................... 31 Intersectionality .......................................................................... 39 Identity as Assemblages .............................................................. 41 A Venn Diagram of Feminist/Film/Queer Theory ................................... 55 Critical Pedagogy and Interpretive Analyses .......................................... 68 Curriculum and Textbook Studies ............................................... 79 Cartographies of Knowledge ....................................................... 80 LGBTQIA+ Perspectives and Introductory Curriculums ............. 82 III. METHODOLOGY/METHOD ......................................................................... 85 Limitations of the Methodological Process ............................................. 89 Choosing the Texts for Analysis ............................................................. 91 Thematic Content Analysis..................................................................... 97 Critical Discourse Analysis .................................................................... 99 Construction of Knowledge .................................................................. 104 Validity ................................................................................................ 105 IV. ANALYTICAL FINDINGS .......................................................................... 106 Introductory Film Studies and the Construction of Knowledge ............. 107 Organization of Knowledge .................................................................. 109 iv Film Form and Meaning ........................................................... 111 Hollywood as Leader and Underdog ......................................... 114 Hollywood History and the Privileging of Tradition .................. 116 The Canonical Approach ...................................................................... 130 The Aesthetic Perspective ......................................................... 131 Framing as Meaning-Making .................................................... 132 Genre and Film Typology..................................................................... 136 Traditional Critical Analysis ................................................................. 147 A Multi-Disciplinary Curriculum ......................................................... 155 Othering Non-Canonical Perspectives .................................................. 157 Marginalizing Language and Filmic Examples ..................................... 165 Holistic Disparaging ............................................................................. 167 Implicit and Explicit Biases ...................................................... 169 Othering Language ................................................................... 170 LGBTQIA+ Specific Language and Filmic Examples ............... 177 ‘Homosexual’ as an Identifying Term ....................................... 177 Critical Analysis Examples ....................................................... 181 V. CARTOGRAPHIES OF KNOWLEDGE IN INTRODUCTORY FILM STUDIES CURRICULUM ............................................................ 187 Rule 1: The Process of Analytical Meaning-Making Foregrounds a Mostly White, Heteronormative, Patriarchal, Hollywood Perspective ...................................................................................... 189 Rule 2: A Formal, Canonical Aesthetic Analysis is Privileged .............. 193 Rule 3: The Construction of Knowledge is Multi-Disciplinary Rather Than Interdisciplinary .......................................................... 197 Rule 4: Any ‘Way of Looking’ That Does not Conform to the Traditional Canonical Analysis is Marginalized, Elided, and/or Degraded Through Language Use and Filmic Examples .................. 199 Considering Students as Individuals ..................................................... 203 VI. TOWARD A RELATIONAL AESTHETICS OF FILM STUDIES CURRICULUM ........................................................................................ 206 Considering a New Curriculum ............................................................ 207 Putting it all Together ........................................................................... 211 REFERENCES............................................................................................................ 231 v LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Instances of LGBTQIA+ Language and Examples Used and the Sections in Which Those Examples Occur .................................................. 185 Table 2. Details of Major Critical Analyses Used in Each Textbook ............................ 186 vi LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Method Process .............................................................................................. 96 vii CHAPTER I CONTEXTUAL CONSIDERATIONS In November of 2016, voters in the United States elected a new administration that campaigned on a platform of fear; a nationalistic, isolationist fear of the Other. This nationalist wave has infected various countries around the world, and while this is not a new political ideology, fear based on Otherness is once again emboldened to show itself in myriad, public ways. No longer are racist, sexist, classist, homophobic ideologies
Recommended publications
  • The American Studies Newsletter
    Summer 2015 The American Studies Newsletter Letter from the Chair, Dr. Alex Lubin I returned to UNM this Fall after a In this issue: three year leave of absence from UNM. During my leave I directed an *Letter from the Chair American Studies center at the *Faculty News *Faculty Publication American University of Beirut *Bravo Graduates (AUB). The AUB is one of the oldest *Senior Thesis Symposium “American” institutions in the *Graduate Student News Middle East. It was founded by *ASGSA *Graduate Program News protestant missionaries from *Special Lecture Series Massachusetts in the second decade of the nineteenth century. *Queer Studies in AMST Many of the missionaries to Mt. Lebanon had engaged in similar *Transnational Collective *Social Movements missionary work on the U.S. frontier, and they regularly compared Collective their experiences “converting” American Indians to their *Alumni News experiences with Arab Ottomans. * From the Administrator Edited by Rafael Martinez The AUB was the ideal venue to develop my conception of the possibilities of transnational American Studies, particularly in the decades following the Cold War. The linkages between U.S. AMERICAN STUDIES MSC03 2110 territorial expansion on the North American continent and globally 425 HUMANITIES were starkly visible in Beirut and on the campus of the AUB. While ALBUQUERQUE, NM in Beirut I completed my second monograph, Geographies of 87131-0001 Liberation: The Making of an Afro Arab Political Imaginary, which PHONE: (505) 277-3929 FAX: 505-277-1208 I hope demonstrates what transnational American Studies is and can be. Department Administrator: Sandy Rodrigue [email protected] While American Studies scholars in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ''What Lips These Lips Have Kissed'': Refiguring the Politics of Queer Public Kissing
    Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2006, pp. 1Á/26 ‘‘What Lips These Lips Have Kissed’’: Refiguring the Politics of Queer Public Kissing Charles E. Morris III & John M. Sloop In this essay, we argue that man-on-man kissing, and its representations, have been insufficiently mobilized within apolitical, incremental, and assimilationist pro-gay logics of visibility. In response, we call for a perspective that understands man-on-man kissing as a political imperative and kairotic. After a critical analysis of man-on-man kissing’s relation to such politics, we discuss how it can be utilized as a juggernaut in a broader project of queer world making, and investigate ideological, political, and economic barriers to the creation of this queer kissing ‘‘visual mass.’’ We conclude with relevant implications regarding same-sex kissing and the politics of visible pleasure. Keywords: Same-Sex Kissing; Queer Politics; Public Sex; Gay Representation In general, one may pronounce kissing dangerous. A spark of fire has often been struck out of the collision of lips that has blown up the whole magazine of 1 virtue.*/Anonymous, 1803 Kissing, in certain figurations, has lost none of its hot promise since our epigraph was penned two centuries ago. Its ongoing transformative combustion may be witnessed in two extraordinarily divergent perspectives on its cultural representation and political implications. In 2001, queer filmmaker Bruce LaBruce offered in Toronto’s Eye Weekly a noteworthy rave of the sophomoric buddy film Dude, Where’s My Car? One scene in particular inspired LaBruce, in which we find our stoned protagonists Jesse (Ashton Kutcher) and Chester (Seann William Scott) idling at a stoplight next to superhunk Fabio and his equally alluring female passenger.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pedagogical Tool for the Application of Critical Discourse Analysis in the Interpretation of Film and Other Multimodal Discursive Practices
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2015 Active Critical Engagement (ACE): A Pedagogical Tool for the Application of Critical Discourse Analysis in the Interpretation of Film and Other Multimodal Discursive Practices Sultana Aaliuah Shabazz University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons Recommended Citation Shabazz, Sultana Aaliuah, "Active Critical Engagement (ACE): A Pedagogical Tool for the Application of Critical Discourse Analysis in the Interpretation of Film and Other Multimodal Discursive Practices. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2015. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3607 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Sultana Aaliuah Shabazz entitled "Active Critical Engagement (ACE): A Pedagogical Tool for the Application of Critical Discourse Analysis in the Interpretation of Film and Other Multimodal Discursive Practices." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education. Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Harry Dahms, Rebecca Klenk, Lois Presser Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbian & Gay Film Festival
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI GBLA Film Gender and Sexuality Center 1994 Lesbian & Gay Film Festival Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/gbla-film Recommended Citation "Lesbian & Gay Film Festival" (1994). GBLA Film. Paper 14. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/gbla-film/14https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/gbla-film/14 This Playbill is brought to you for free and open access by the Gender and Sexuality Center at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in GBLA Film by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. mediaby JennieLivingston (Pans 1s Burning) and Jim Lyons OnJune 28, 1969, (Poison),a selectionof films fromAndrea Weiss' recently publishet shortlyafter oneam, the NewYork Police City entered the Vampiresand Violets.Lesbians in Film anda videopresentation StonewallInn on a routineraid But on this fatefulmorning just andlecture, Fifty Yearsof Perversity,in whichRosa van Praunheim hoursafter the funeralof the legendaryJudy Garland a few will discusshis illustriouscinematic career. Closing the '94 bravesouls donned shields of rageand pride, igniting the historic Festivalwill be GreggBordowitz's powerful AIDS testimony Fast riot that wouldcome to be knownas the StonewallRebellion Trip,Long Drop GETYOUR Forfive dayslesbians and gays waged battle, ushering in an era As an organizationdependent upon the invaluableresource of of politicalactivism and personal pride, giving birth to a movement humanbeings, this
    [Show full text]
  • University of St Andrews Department of Film Studies School President of Film Studies and Music End of Semester Report 2017-2018 Semester One
    University of St Andrews Department of Film Studies School President of Film Studies and Music End of Semester Report 2017-2018 Semester One Contents SSCCs .............................................................................................................................. 2 Elections .......................................................................................................................... 2 Community ..................................................................................................................... 2 60 Hour Film Blitz .......................................................................................................... 2 Mentoring Scheme ......................................................................................................... 2 Communication .............................................................................................................. 3 Careers ............................................................................................................................ 4 Enhancement Theme Funding ...................................................................................... 4 Visiting Days .................................................................................................................. 4 Looking forward ............................................................................................................ 4 Appendix A ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema Studies and Moving Image Arts
    University of Colorado Boulder 2016 Program Review Film Studies Program Academic Review and Planning Advisory Committee Report Approved Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs: Date Contents Process Overview – 3 2016 ARPAC Members – 4 Unit Overview – 5 Past Reviews – 14 Campus Context – 15 National Context – 16 Analysis – 17 Recommendations – 23 Required Follow-Up – 27 2016 Film Studies Program Review 2 Process Overview The review of the Film Studies Program was conducted in accordance with the 2016 review guidelines. The Academic Review and Planning Advisory Committee (ARPAC) conducts and writes the final reviews of all academic units on the Boulder campus. The unit prepared a self-study, which was reviewed by an internal review committee (IRC) of two CU Boulder faculty members from outside of the program. The internal reviewers certified that the self-study was largely accurate and complete, noting that there were some optional questions that it might be helpful to answer, which the unit has done. The IRC also conducted undergraduate and graduate surveys and met privately with two undergraduate students. An external review committee (ERC), consisting of two experts within the discipline from outside of the University of Colorado, visited the unit on April 12 and 13, 2016, reviewed the relevant documents, and met with the program director, one associate professor, three assistant professors, some graduate students, university administrators, and members of ARPAC. A meeting scheduled with undergraduates drew no attendees. The reviewers’ comments and recommendations are cited at the appropriate points throughout the report. This public document reflects the assessments and recommendations for the Film Studies Program approved by ARPAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Thèse Et Mémoire
    Université de Montréal Survivance 101 : Community ou l’art de traverser la mutation du paysage télévisuel contemporain Par Frédérique Khazoom Département d’histoire de l’art et d’études cinématographiques, Université de Montréal, Faculté des arts et des sciences Mémoire présenté en vue de l’obtention du grade de Maîtrise ès arts en Maîtrise en cinéma, option Cheminement international Décembre 2019 © Frédérique Khazoom, 2019 Université de Montréal Département d’histoire de l’art et d’études cinématographiques Ce mémoire intitulé Survivance 101 : Community ou l’art de traverser la mutation du paysage télévisuel contemporain Présenté par Frédérique Khazoom A été évalué par un jury composé des personnes suivantes Zaira Zarza Président-rapporteur Marta Boni Directeur de recherche Stéfany Boisvert Membre du jury Résumé Lors des années 2000, le paysage télévisuel américain a été profondément bouleversé par l’arrivée d’Internet. Que ce soit dans sa production, sa création ou sa réception, l’évolution rapide des technologies numériques et l’apparition des nouveaux médias ont contraint l’industrie télévisuelle à changer, parfois contre son gré. C’est le cas de la chaîne généraliste américaine NBC, pour qui cette période de transition a été particulièrement difficile à traverser. Au cœur de ce moment charnière dans l’histoire de la télévision aux États-Unis, la sitcom Community (NBC, 2009- 2014; Yahoo!Screen, 2015) incarne et témoigne bien de différentes transformations amenées par cette convergence entre Internet et la télévision et des conséquences de cette dernière dans l’industrie télévisuelle. L’observation du parcours tumultueux de la comédie de situation ayant débuté sur les ondes de NBC dans le cadre de sa programmation Must-See TV, entre 2009 et 2014, avant de se terminer sur le service par contournement Yahoo! Screen, en 2015, permet de constater que Community est un objet télévisuel qui a constamment cherché à s’adapter à un média en pleine mutation.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacklist100 E-Book 14JUL2020 V2.3
    Table of Contents 04: Curatorial Note 10: Open Letter on Race 19: Short Essay: Celebrating Blackness on Juneteenth 25: Artist Statement & Works (Elizabeth Colomba) 28: Short Essay: Who sets the standards for equality (E’lana Jordan) 31: Category 1: Cause & Community 58: Category 2: Industry & Services 85: Spoken Word Poem: A-head of the School 86: Category 3: Marketing, Communication & Design 113: Spoken Word Poem: Culture Storm 114: Category 4: Media, Arts & Entertainment 141: Category 5: STEM & Healthcare 168: Full 2020 blacklist100 171: Closing Acknowledgements 2 Curatorial Note This e-book originated as a post on LinkedIn the week following the death of George Floyd. The post included an 8-page document entitled an “Open Letter on Race." The letter was released as a 25-minute video, also. The central theme of the letter was a reflection on Dr. Martin Luther King’s critical question: “Where do we go from here?" Leading into the week of Juneteenth, the Open Letter on Race received over 30,000 views, shares, and engagements. Friends were inspired to draft essays sharing their stories; and this book represents their collective energy. In the arc of history, we stand hopeful that we have now reached a long-awaited inflection point; this book is a demonstration that the People are ready to lead change. This e-book features 100 Black culture-makers & thought-leaders whose message is made for this moment. The theme of this book is “A Call for Change.” This interactive book will never be printed, and has embedded hyperlinks so you can take action now.
    [Show full text]
  • GLMA's 35Th Annual Conference on LGBT Health
    Conference Program GLMA’s 35th Annual Conference on LGBT Health Hotel Map Conference Program GLMA’s 35th Annual Conference on LGBT Health Table of Contents About GLMA........................................................................................................ 2 GLMA President’s Welcome................................................................................ 4 GLMA Education Committee Welcome........................................................... 5 General Information............................................................................................. 6 Social Networking Information............................................................... 6 Conference Goals & Learning Objectives............................................. 8 CME / CE & Evaluation Information.................................................. 9 Special & Social Events Calendar........................................................................ 11 GLMA Achievement Awards Gala.................................................................... 15 Schedule-at-a-Glance............................................................................................. 16 Conference Schedule............................................................................................. 17 Wednesday................................................................................................... 17 Thursday...................................................................................................... 18 Friday...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La Posmodernidad Analiza La Sitcom: Community
    La Posmodernidad Analiza la Sitcom: Community Autor /a: Jaime Costas Nicolás Profesor/a: Iván Pintor Encrucijadas contemporáneas entre cine, televisión y cómic, primer trimestre, 2013-2014 Facultat de Comunicación Universitat Pompeu Fabra Resum / Resumen: Mucho se ha escrito sobre la relación entre posmodernismo y la sitcom Community. En el presente ensayo, a través del análisis de dos de sus episodios, no sólo se constata esta relación sino que se postula que en el centro argumental de la serie y en los engranajes que la hacen funcionar se encuentra la propia idea de posmodernismo y las diversas técnicas que han identificado este movimiento cultural. Paraules clau / Palabras clave: · Posmodernismo Community intertextualidad metaficción Abstract: Much has been written about the relationship between the situational comedy Community and postmodernism. In this essay, through the analysis of two of its episodes, we not only reassure this connection but we also argue that the narrative center of the show and the engines that make it move forward are the idea of postmodernism itself and the different techniques that have defined this cultural movement. Keywords: Postmodernism Community intertextuality metafiction La posmodernidad analiza la sitcom: Community En esta última década, la ficción televisiva está viviendo uno de sus mejores momentos en cuanto a calidad y variedad, gracias a una mayor complejidad narrativa o el uso de nuevas formas y géneros. Ya en los años noventa nos encontramos con los primeros indicios de esta explosión cualitativa, de ahí el nombre Quality TV, que vendría más adelante, con ficciones como la lynchiana Twin Peaks (1990 - 1991) o el archiconocido caso de la comedia que no trataba sobre nada, Seinfeld (1989 - 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Accomplishments 5.Qx4
    Media Trainings Bishop Gene Robin MSNBC Michael Savage Take Action! HIV/AIDS Bug Chasers Rolling Stone stina Aguilera GLAAD Media Awards USA Today Families Matter Boy Meet ESPN Queer Eye Angels in America osie O’Donnell Jerry Thacker Gallup Massachusetts Canada Marriage Eq ames Dobson Anti-Gay Industry Kent in2 Scalia 003Lawrence v. Texas Santorum Hate Crimes Sakia Gunn Bella Evang ational Black Justice Coalition Brides Opinión Bishop Gene Robinson Integ Media Trainings Sabado Gigante AP Announcing Equality New York Time HBO Harvey Milk School “Fag Song” Bravo Write Now! glaad was there. Massachusetts Canada Marriage E New Year’s Hate Crime In Cincinnati – january After media outlets in Cincinnati downplay coverage of the hate-motivated New Year’s ‘Rolling Stone’ Chases Bugs – GLAAD MSNBC’SANTI-GAY SAVAGE calls on Rolling Stone to publicly correct Eve murder of Gregory Beauchamp (who GLAAD FOCUS gross errors of fact and attribution in an was shot to death by a man yelling homo- In February 2003, MSNBC announced it article about “bug chasers,” men who phobic slurs), Associate Regional Media would launch a show featuring viru- actively seek HIV infection. When the anti- Director Michael Young works with local lently homophobic radio host Michael gay Traditional Values Coalition exploits reporters to examine the unique nature of Savage. MSNBC’s Savage Nation pre- the article’s inaccuracies to claim bug- hate-motivated violence. The resulting sented GLAAD an opportunity to focus chasing is an “epidemic,” GLAAD partners media coverage and community activism national attention on cable news’ grow- with HIV/AIDS experts to urge media to leads the city council to introduce and pass ing embrace of right-wing homophobes debunk the TVC’s fabrications and publish a hate crimes law the following month.
    [Show full text]
  • Scms 2017 Conference Program
    SCMS 2017 CONFERENCE PROGRAM FAIRMONT CHICAGO MILLENNIUM PARK March 22–26, 2017 Letter from the President Dear Friends and Colleagues, On behalf of the Board of Directors, the Host and Program Committees, and the Home Office staff, let me welcome everyone to SCMS 2017 in Chicago! Because of its Midwestern location and huge hub airport, not to say its wealth of great restaurants, nightlife, museums, shopping, and architecture, Chicago is always an exciting setting for an SCMS conference. This year at the Fairmont Chicago hotel we are in the heart of the city, close to the Loop, the river, and the Magnificent Mile. You can see the nearby Millennium Park from our hotel and the Art Institute on Michigan Avenue is but a short walk away. Included with the inexpensive hotel rate, moreover, are several amenities that I hope you will enjoy. I know from previewing the program that, as always, it boasts an impressive display of the best, most stimulating work presently being done in our field, which is at once singular in its focus on visual and digital media and yet quite diverse in its scope, intellectual interests and goals, and methodologies. This year we introduced our new policy limiting members to a single role, and I am happy to say that we achieved our goal of having fewer panels overall with no apparent loss of quality in the program or member participation. With this conference we have made presentation abstracts available online on a voluntary basis, and I urge you to let them help you navigate your way through the program.
    [Show full text]