DOCSLIB.ORG

Culture of Poverty Vs Destruction of Impoverished Poor Ethnic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Culture of Poverty Vs Destruction of Impoverished Poor Ethnic Culture of Poverty vs Destruction of Impoverished Poor Ethnic Communities: Two Approaches to Healing Poverty and Racial Injustice Marc Pilisuk Each cultural pattern, if it has survived, has had within it a set of practices and beliefs sufficient to avoid the eradication of its members and of its nurturing habitat. Viable cultural patterns include the roles of kin and non-kin in providing for the shelter, food, healing socialization of children, and teaching the accepted norms of the social group. Poverty strains such cultural support. The persistent cycle of impoverished neighborhoods enduring across generations. Led to the concept of a culture of poverty. Its major tenet is that the poor are not only lacking resources, but they also are themselves transformed by a poverty-perpetuating value system. According to Oscar Lewis, "The subculture [of the poor] develops mechanisms that tend to perpetuate it, especially because of what happens to the world view, aspirations, and character of the children who grow up in it.” (Moynihan 1969, p. 199). The term "subculture of poverty" first appeared in the ethnography Five Families: Mexican Case Studies in the Culture of Poverty (1959) by anthropologist Oscar Lewis. Lewis struggled to render "the poor" as legitimate subjects whose lives were transformed by poverty. Lewis argued that although the burdens of poverty resulted from the larger system and were imposed upon certain members of society, they led to the formation of an autonomous subculture. Children were socialized into behaviors and attitudes that perpetuated their inability to escape the underclass. Lewis offered as many as seventy characteristics that indicated the presence of the culture of poverty (1996 [1966], 1998), which he argued was not shared among all of the lower classes. The people in a culture of poverty have a strong feelings of marginality, helplessness, dependency, and not belonging. They are alienated and estranged in their own country. They are convinced that the existing institutions do not serve their needs. They internalize the scorn of others and share widespread feelings of inferiority. Racial discrimination may exacerbate this as in the US but the slum dwellers of Mexico City, who did not constitute a distinct ethnic or racial group, also demonstrated the pattern. People within a culture of poverty have very little sense of history. They are a marginal people who know only their own troubles, their own local conditions, their own neighborhood, their own way of life. Usually, they have neither the knowledge, the vision nor the ideology to see the similarities between their problems and those of others like themselves elsewhere in the world. In other words, they are not class conscious, although they are very sensitive indeed to status distinctions. When the poor become class conscious or members of trade union organizations, or when they adopt an internationalist outlook on the world they are, in my view, no longer part of the culture of poverty although they may still be desperately poor.(Lewis 1998) The theory attracted academic and policy attention in the 1960s, but has largely been discredited by academics around the turn of the century (Goode and Eames, 1996; Bourgois, 2001; Small M.L., Harding D.J., Lamont M., 2010). Although the idea is experiencing a comeback, current scholars recognize many scholars have noticed that the poor do not typically hold different values from middle class people. Critics of the culture of poverty argument insist that structural factors rather than individual characteristics better explain the persistence of poverty (Goode and Eames, 1996; Bourgois, 2001; Small M.L., Harding D.J., Lamont M., 2010. Rather than the "values" of the poor as the reason for potentially mal- adaptive behaviors, [1]. racism and isolation were considered to underlie the persistence of poverty. 2 Although Lewis was concerned with poverty in the developing world, the culture of poverty concept proved attractive to U.S. public policy makers and politicians. It strongly informed documents such as the Moynihan Report (1965) and the War on Poverty more generally. The culture of poverty also emerges as a key concept in Michael Harrington's discussion of American poverty in The Other America (1962). For Harrington, the culture of poverty is a structural concept defined by social institutions of exclusion which create and perpetuate the cycle of poverty in America. Proponents of this theory argued that the poor are not simply lacking resources, but also acquire a poverty-perpetuating value system. According to Oscar Lewis, "The subculture [of the poor] develops mechanisms that tend to perpetuate it, especially because of what happens to the world view, aspirations, and character of the children who grow up in it.” (Moynihan 1969, p. 199). Later scholars have noticed that the poor do not have different values. The term "subculture of poverty" (later shortened to "culture of poverty") made its first appearance in the ethnography Five Families: Mexican Case Studies in the Culture of Poverty (1959) by anthropologist Oscar Lewis. Lewis struggled to render "the poor" as legitimate subjects whose lives were transformed by poverty. He argued that although the burdens of poverty were systemic and therefore imposed upon these members of society, they led to the formation of an autonomous subculture as children were socialized into behaviors and attitudes that perpetuated their inability to escape the underclass. Lewis gave some seventy characteristics (1996 [1966], 1998) that indicated the presence of the culture of poverty, which he argued was not shared among all of the lower classes. The people engulfed in the culture of poverty have strong feelings of marginality, of helplessness, of dependency, of not belonging. They are like aliens in their own country, convinced that the existing institutions do not serve their interests and needs. Along with this feeling of powerlessness is a widespread feeling of inferiority, of personal unworthiness. This is true of the slum dwellers of Mexico City, who do not constitute a distinct ethnic or racial group and do not suffer from 3 racial discrimination. In the United States the culture of poverty that exists in the Negroes has the additional disadvantage of racial discrimination. People with a culture of poverty have very little sense of history. They are a marginal people who know only their own troubles, their own local conditions, their own neighborhood, their own way of life. Usually, they have neither the knowledge, the vision nor the ideology to see the similarities between their problems and those of others like themselves elsewhere in the world. In other words, they are not class conscious, although they are very sensitive indeed to status distinctions. When the poor become class conscious or members of trade union organizations, or when they adopt an internationalist outlook on the world they are, in my view, no longer part of the culture of poverty although they may still be desperately poor. (Lewis 1998) This culture contains a strong element of despair, marginality, sense of unworthiness. In such a subculture, an ethos of fighting for daily survival, avoidance of future planning, often without capacity for longer term regard of the well-being of self and community. Lewis argued that such an internalized life view was itself a major factor preventing any escape from poverty whether initiated by internal or by external efforts. While Lewis was a humanistic scholar and his indictment was of the society rather than upon the distressed individuals within it, his proposals to address the problem, and the many implementations of subsequent anti-poverty activity, have been guided by efforts to change the sub- culture of poverty, ie, attitudes and behaviors of individuals. Despite controversy, this assumption underlies much of the conventional approach to helping members of poor, ethnic minority groups to improve their lives. While hunger, malnutrition and homelessness are tangible indictors, the experience of poverty is typically relative to what one sees as the wealth of others. 4 Awareness of poverty is based upon observations of inequality. Wide and unbreachable gaps test the resilience of traditional cultures. The gap is illustrated in the United States where 46.5 million people live in poverty. At 21.8 percent, childhood poverty in the US is the highest in the industrialized world. One out of four US children lives in a family that receives food stamps, a program that faces cuts even while family income shows no gain. Poverty among US seniors is increasing. Over 9 percent of seniors lived in poverty in 2012 , a percentage higher than in 1972. It is no accident that average American families have seen their incomes decline over the past 30 years as an economic agenda endorsed by the two major political parties has endorsed “free trade” agreements which have served to exchange American jobs, workplace standards, food safety laws and consumer protections for greater corporate profits. While median family income has declined and poverty has increased, the number of millionaires and billionaires has grown at an extraordinary rate. In 1996, there were 121 billionaires in this country; now there are 442. Corporate greed has ushered in large gaps in the capacity of local communities to apply their cultural strengths to the well- being of their members. With corporations extracting more from the commons and returning less, people are asked to accept the mandates of austerity. Austerity is driving many to suicide, depression and causing soaring rates of drug use and HIV and increases in infectious disease. Austerity reduced access to medicines and health care in Europe and U.S. 10,000 suicides and a million depression cases can be blamed on austerity. In Greece, HIV rates increased 200% since 2011 because of budget cuts * Greece had first malaria outbreak for decades due to mosquito spraying cuts * Five million Americans lost access to health care during recession * In Britain, 10,000 families are now homeless because of austerity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trust Mechanisms, Cultural Difference and Poverty Alleviation
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 20 (2018) Issue 2 Article 8 Trust Mechanisms, Cultural Difference and Poverty Alleviation Lihua Guo MinZu University of China Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Economics Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Guo, Lihua. "Trust Mechanisms, Cultural Difference and Poverty Alleviation." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.2 (2018): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3229> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field. The above text, published by Purdue University Press ©Purdue University, has been downloaded 106 times as of 11/ 07/19.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty-Related Topics Found in Dissertations: a Bibliography. INS1ITUTION Wisconsin Univ., Madison
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 135 540 RC 009 699 AUTEJOR O'Neill, Mara, Comp.; And Others TITLE Poverty-Related Topics Found in Dissertations: A Bibliography. INS1ITUTION Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Inst. for Research on Poverty. PUB LATE 76 NOTE 77p. EDRS PRICE 1E-$0.83 HC-$4.67 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indians; *Annotated Bibliographies; Attitudes; Bilingual Education; Community Involvement; Culturally Disadvantaged; *Doctoral Theses; *Economically Disadvantaged; *Economic Disadvantagement; *Economic Research; Government Role; Guaranteed Income; Human Services; Low Income Groups; Manpower Development; Mexican Americans; Negroes; Clder Adults; Politics; Poverty Programs; Dural Population; Social Services; *Socioeconomic Influences; Welfare; Working Women IDENTIFIERS Chicanos ABSIRACI Arranged alphabetically by main toPic, this bibliography cites 322 doctoral dissertations, written between 1970 and 1974, pertaining to various aspects of poverty. Where possible, annotations have been written to present the kernel idea of the work. Im many instances, additional subject headings which reflect important secondary thrusts are also included. Topics covered include: rural poverty; acceso and delivery of services (i.e., food, health, medical, social, and family planning services); employment; health care; legal services; public welfare; adoptions, transracial; the aged; anomie; antipoverty programs; attitudes of Blacks, Congressmen, minorities, residents, retailers, and the poor; bilingual-bicultural education; discrimination dn employment and housing; social services; social welfare; Blacks, Chicanos, and Puerto Ricans; participation of poor in decision making; poverty in history; education; community participation; culture of poverty; and attitudes toward fertility, social services, welfare, and the poor. Author and zubject indices are included to facilitate the location of a work. The dicsertations are available at the institutions wherethe degrees were earned or from University Microfilms.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Against Essentialism and the ''Culture of Poverty''
    6 TEACHING AGAINST ESSENTIALISM AND THE ‘‘CULTURE OF POVERTY’’ Paul C. Gorski randma tends to stretch vowel sounds, drawing extended air time out of them in her sweet Appalachian twang. Where D.C.-born G folk like me give a door a push, she gives it a poosh. Where I crave candy, she offers sweeter-sounding cane-dee. Her vocabulary, as well, is of a western Maryland mountain variety, unassuming and undisturbed by slangy language or new age idiom. To her, a refrigerator is still a Frigidaire; or, more precisely, a freegeedaire; neighbors live across the way. Her children, including my mother, say she’s never cursed and only occasionally lets fly her fiercest expression: Great day in the mornin’! Despite growing up in poverty, Grandma isn’t uneducated or lacking in contemporary wits, as one might presume based upon the ‘‘culture of pov- erty’’ paradigm that dominates today’s understandings of poverty and schooling in the United States. She graduated first in her high school class. Later, the year she turned 50, she completed college and became a nurse. I’ve never been tempted to ‘‘correct’’ Grandma’s language, nor do I feel embarrassed when she talks about how my Uncle Terry’s gone a’feesheen’. She doesn’t need my diction or vocabulary to give meaning to her world. She certainly doesn’t need to be freed from the grasp of a mythical ‘‘culture of poverty’’ or its fictional ‘‘language registers.’’ What needs a’fixin’ is not Grandma’s dispositions or behaviors, but those of a society that sees only her poverty and, as a result, labels her—the beloved matriarch of an extended 84 Copyright 2012 Stylus Publishing, LLC www.Styluspub.com ................
    [Show full text]
  • Culture of Poverty’ in a Major Publication
    Poerty and Gender in Deeloping Nations United Nations Centre for Human Settlements 1999 Women’s Poverty research throughout history has been more Rights to Land, Housing and Property in Postconflict Situations successful at reflecting the biases of an investigator’s and During Reconstruction: A Global Oeriew. Land Man- society than at analyzing the experience of poverty. F agement Series 9. UNCHS, Nairobi, Kenya The state of poverty research in any given country United Nations Development Programme 1998 Human De- emerges almost as a litmus for gauging contemporary elopment Report 1998. Published annually since 1990 with different emphases. Oxford University Press, New York social attitudes toward inequality and marginaliz- United Nations Research Institution for Social Development ation. For example, while Lewis’s books are read by a (UNRISD), United Nations Development Programme US public as an individualistic interpretation of the (UNDP), Centre for Development Studies, Kerala 1999 persistence of poverty that blames victims, in France Gender, Poerty and Well-Being: Indicators and Strategies. his work is interpreted as a critique of society’s failure Report of the UNRISD, UNDP and CDS International to remedy the injuries of class-based inequality under Workshop, November 1997. UNRISD, Geneva free market capitalism. World Bank 2000 World Deelopment Report 2000\1: Attacking Poerty. Oxford University Press, New York I. Tinker 2. Defining the Culture of Poerty The socialist sociologist Michael Harrington was the first prominent academic to use the phrase ‘culture of poverty’ in a major publication. His book, The Other America, documented rural poverty in Appalachia Poverty, Culture of and represented a moral call to action that anticipated the War on Poverty initiated by President Johnson in The culture of poverty concept was developed in the 1964 (Harrington 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Reconfigurations of Poverty and the Public: Anthropological Perspectives and Ethnographic Challenges
    Global Reconfigurations of Poverty and the Public: Anthropological perspectives and ethnographic challenges Responsible Institution: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Bergen (UiB) Disciplines: Social Anthropology, History, Cultural Studies, Sociology Course Leader: Vigdis Broch-Due, Professor of International Poverty Research, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Bergen Invited Course Leaders: Jean Comaroff, Professor of Anthropology and of Social Sciences, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago Akhil Gupta, Professor and Chair, IDP South Asian Studies Department of Anthropology and International Institute, UCLA Alice O'Connor, Associate Professor,Department of History, University of California, Santa Barbara & Director for the programs on Persistent Urban Poverty and International Migration at the Social Science Research Council (USA) Course Description: “The Poor”, - a group figuring so prominently in contemporary media and the discourses of aid, human rights and global insecurity, in fact consist largely of the classical subjects of anthropology. While anthropologists continue to produce ethnography about the specificities of different peoples, few address the problems that arise when all that cultural diversity is subsumed under the headings “Poverty” or “the Poor”. Anthropologists who do address questions of poverty are often sidelined in increasingly globalised policy debates that set quantitative “goals” and seek measurable formulae for attaining them. Why are anthropologists vocal on the plight of distinct peoples but silent or marginalized on the subject of the “the poor”? How do we research, theorize, let alone compose ethnographies, which focus on such a diffuse, standardised, globalised entity as “poverty” and “the poor”? Should we? And what are the consequences of remaining on the sidelines? These questions outline the analytical challenges of this PhD course.
    [Show full text]
  • “Absolutely Sort of Normal”: the Common Origins of the War on Poverty at Home and Abroad, 1961-1965
    “ABSOLUTELY SORT OF NORMAL”: THE COMMON ORIGINS OF THE WAR ON POVERTY AT HOME AND ABROAD, 1961-1965 by DANIEL VICTOR AKSAMIT B.A., UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, 2005 M.A., KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2014 Abstract Scholars identify the early 1960s as the moment when Americans rediscovered poverty – as the time when Presidents, policymakers, and the public shifted their attention away from celebrating the affluence of the 1950s and toward directly helping poor people within the culture of poverty through major federal programs such as the Peace Corps and Job Corps. This dissertation argues that this moment should not be viewed as a rediscovery of poverty by Americans. Rather, it should be viewed as a paradigm shift that conceptually unified the understanding of both foreign and domestic privation within the concept of a culture of poverty. A culture of poverty equally hindered poor people all around the world, resulting in widespread illiteracy in India and juvenile delinquency in Indianapolis. Policymakers defined poverty less by employment rate or location (rural poverty in Ghana versus inner-city poverty in New York) and more by the cultural values of the poor people (apathy toward change, disdain for education, lack of planning for the future, and desire for immediate gratification). In a sense, the poor person who lived in the Philippines and the one who lived in Philadelphia became one. They suffered from the same cultural limitations and could be helped through the same remedy.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Culture of Poverty' Makes a Comeback
    ‘Culture of Poverty’ Makes a Comeback By PATRICIA COHEN, Published: October 17, 2010 NYTImes WebSite For more than 40 years, social scientists investigating the causes of poverty have tended to treat cultural explanations like Lord Voldemort: That Which Must Not Be Named. The reticence was a legacy of the ugly battles that erupted after Daniel Patrick Moynihan, then an assistant labor secretary in the Johnson administration, introduced the idea of a “culture of poverty” to the public in a startling 1965 report. Although Moynihan didn’t coin the phrase (that distinction belongs to the anthropologist Oscar Lewis), his description of the urban black family as caught in an inescapable “tangle of pathology” of unmarried mothers and welfare dependency was seen as attributing self-perpetuating moral deficiencies to black people, as if blaming them for their own misfortune. Moynihan’s analysis never lost its appeal to conservative thinkers, whose arguments ultimately succeeded when President Bill Clinton signed a bill in 1996 “ending welfare as we know it.” But in the overwhelmingly liberal ranks of academic sociology and anthropology the word “culture” became a live grenade, and the idea that attitudes and behavior patterns kept people poor was shunned. Now, after decades of silence, these scholars are speaking openly about you-know-what, conceding that culture and persistent poverty are enmeshed. “We’ve finally reached the stage where people aren’t afraid of being politically incorrect,” said Douglas S. Massey, a sociologist at Princeton who has argued that Moynihan was unfairly maligned. … The topic has generated interest on Capitol Hill because so much of the research intersects with policy debates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Poverty Cultural Vs. Structural: Can There Be a Synthesis?
    The Causes of Poverty - Cultural vs. Structural The Causes of Poverty Cultural vs. Structural: Can There Be a Synthesis? Gregory Jordan There are many competing theories about the causes of poverty in the United States with mountains of empirical evidence to justify support for each. The debate among theorists and policymakers is primarily divided between advocates who support cultural/behavioral arguments and those who support structural/economic arguments. This debate tends to manifest itself across political party lines with republicans supporting the cultural/behav- ioral thesis and democrats looking more to structural causes. The passage of the "behavioral" focused Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (1996) and its possible strengthening by the Bush Administration and its congressional al- lies calls for further examination of the relationship between cultural/behavioral and struc- tural causes of poverty. This paper will briefly examine the theoretical arguments behind these competing views followed by an analysis to determine the empirical relevancy of each. It should be noted that the exploration of this topic began with the intention of making an argument for the fusion of these perspectives into a single empirically validat- ed theory; one that would build upon Orlando Patterson's (2000) theoretical model on the interaction between cultural models, structural environments and behavioral outcomes. In close similarity to Patterson (2000), my thesis is that cultural and/or behavioral varia- bles are only relevant to the degree that historical structural factors condition the environ- ment in which groups of varying economic and social advantage operate in and react to. More specifically, behavioral variables (e.g., teen pregnancy, divorce, crime) should not merely be viewed as static behavioral dysfunctions exclusive to certain groups, but as proxies for cultural mechanisms that are always at play in all social groups and in all con- texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Discourses of Poverty in Literature: Assessing Representations of Indigence in Post-Colonial Texts from Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe
    Discourses of Poverty in Literature: Assessing representations of indigence in post-colonial texts from Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe By PHENYO BUTALE Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Tina Steiner Co-supervisor: Prof. Annie Gagiano March 2015 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my original work and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it at any other university for a degree. Signature............................................... Date: 10th October 2014 Copyright © 2015 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT This thesis undertakes a comparative reading of post-colonial literature written in English in Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe to bring into focus the similarities and differences between fictional representations of poverty in these three countries. The thesis explores the unique way in which literature may contribute to the better understanding of poverty, a field that has hitherto been largely dominated by scholarship that relies on quantitative analysis as opposed to qualitative approaches. The thesis seeks to use examples from selected texts to illustrate that (as many social scientists have argued before) literature provides insights into the ‘lived realities’ of the poor and that with its vividly imagined specificities it illuminates the broad generalisations about poverty established in other (data-gathering) disciplines. Selected texts from the three countries destabilise the usual categories of gender, race and class which are often utilised in quantitative studies of poverty and by so doing show that experiences of poverty cut across and intersect all of these spheres and the experiences differ from one person to another regardless of which category they may fall within.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study Analysis of Poverty Coverage in Rural Appalachian
    Telling Us What We Already Know: A Case Study Analysis of Poverty Coverage in Rural Appalachian Community News Outlets A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Michel Clay Carey August 2014 © 2014 Michael Clay Carey. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Telling Us What We Already Know: A Case Study Analysis of Poverty Coverage in Rural Appalachian Community News Outlets by MICHAEL CLAY CAREY has been approved for the E. W. Scripps School of Journalism and the Scripps College of Communication by Aimee Edmondson Associate Professor of Journalism Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii ABSTRACT CAREY, MICHAEL CLAY, Ph.D., August 2014, Mass Communication-Journalism Telling Us What We Already Know: A Case Study Analysis of Poverty Coverage in Rural Appalachian Community News Outlets Director of Dissertation: Aimee Edmondson This dissertation examines the roles local news organizations in three rural Appalachian communities play in the facilitation of discussions about local poverty. The study is grounded in Stuart Hall’s theoretical understanding of the encoding and decoding of media messages (1980), which offers insight on the way social practices influence the production and interpretation of news. Through three separate case studies using qualitative research methods (textual analysis and in-depth interviews), the study describes the dominant media frames local journalists used to describe poverty. Interviews with 11 current and former journalists describe the social and professional habits and philosophies that shape their coverage. Interviews with 40 local residents offer insight into how those messages are interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Outlaws1 Rachel King1, 2 1 Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2 Rock Art Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand
    In praise of outlaws1 Rachel King1, 2 1 Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2 Rock Art Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract ‘Outlaw’ is not a common category of archaeological thought but it is perhaps more useful than meets the eye. ‘Outlaws’ are typically viewed as contingent on legal and capitalist systems; they are, I suggest, also material, affective phenomena that draw our attention to how transgression, dissent, and disorder are conceived through archaeological thinking. Here, I outline some ways in which ‘outlaw’ figures are ‘good to think with’, particularly for historical and colonial contexts but also for broader, more global frontier situations. Through three sketches of archetypal ‘outlaws’ in southern Africa’s recent past, I consider where these disruptive figures draw attention to how mobility, violence, rebellion, and state imagination (and the limits thereof) have been imagined through material mis- behaviours. Keywords outlaws, cattle raiders, vagrancy, rebellion, resistance, southern Africa, colonialism 1 The fieldwork for this research was funded by a Clarendon Scholarship from the University of Oxford. This paper was written during my tenure as Smuts Research Fellow in African Studies and with generous support from the Smuts Memorial Fund. I thank Mark McGranaghan for comments on earlier drafts of this paper and comments from two anonymous reviewers. Introduction ‘Outlaw’ is not a common category of archaeological thought. The term, describing someone engaging in behaviours defined against or outside of what is or was legal, is laden with judgment and historical specificity, inhibiting its use as an analytic with which to think comparatively across time and space.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Group Theory
    2 Theories of Poverty In the social sciences it is usual to start with conceptions or definitions of a social problem or phenomenon and proceed first to its measurement and then its ex- planation before considering, or leaving others to consider, alternative remedies. The operation of value assumptions at each stage tends to be overlooked and the possibility that there might be interaction between, or a conjunction of, these stages tends to be neglected. What has to be remembered is that policy prescriptions permeate conceptualization, measurement and the formulation of theory; alternatively, that the formulation of theory inheres within the conceptualization and measurement of a problem and the application of policy. While implying a particular approach to theory, Chapter 1 was primarily con- cerned with the conceptualization and measurement of poverty in previous studies. This chapter attempts to provide a corresponding account of previous theories of poverty. It will discuss minority group theory, the sub-culture of poverty and the cycle of deprivation, orthodox economic theory, dual labour market and radical theories, and sociological, including functionalist, explanations of poverty and inequality. Until recently, little attempt was made to extend theory to the forms, extent of and changes in poverty as such. Social scientists, including Marx, had been primarily concerned with the evolution of economic, political and social inequality. Economists had devoted most interest to the factor shares of production and distribution rather than to the unequal distribution of resources, and where they had studied the latter, they confined themselves to studies of wages. Sociologists had kept the discussion of the origins of, or need for, equality at a very general level, or had confined their work to topics which were only indirectly or partly related, like occupational status and mobility, and the structure and persistence of local community.
    [Show full text]