DOCSLIB.ORG

Acer Pensylvanicum Striped Maple, Moosewood 2017 ZJE-PA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acer Pensylvanicum Striped Maple, Moosewood 2017 ZJE-PA Acer pensylvanicum Striped Maple, Moosewood 2017 ZJE-PA Actaea racemosa Black Cohosh 2017 Joyce Kilmer Allium tricoccum Ramps, Wild Leeks 2017 PA Allium tuberosum Garlic Chives 2017 Amelanchier sp. Landscaped Serviceberry 2015 DMcGurk Amorpha canescens Leadplant 2017 NKlehm-IL Angelica triquinata Mountain Angelica 2017 WNC Apios americana Groundnut, Hopniss (diploid) 2017 Patuxent Aralia racemosa Spikenard 2017 Laurel Creek WNC Asimina triloba Pawpaw 2017 Susq Select-PA Asparagus officinalis Asparagus 2016 ZJE Camassia quamash Camas 2017 Ontario, OR Camassia scilloides Woodland camas, Atlantic camas 2017 AL,GA,IL,TN Campanula americana American Bellflower 2016 MG Capsicum annuum Bell Pepper 2016 ZJE Carya cordiformis Giant Bitternut 2017 NTN-Hershey Carya illinoinensis Northern Pecans 2017 Carya laciniosa Shellbark hickory 2017 JWH-PA Carya laciniosa Shellbark hickory 2017 Carya ovata Shagbark hickory 2017 JWH-PA Carya sp. Hican - select nuts from multiple varieties 2017 Multiple Castanea mollissima Chinese Chestnut 2017 PA Caulophyllum thalictroides Blue Cohosh 2017 NC,PA Chaerophyllum bulbosum Tuberous Chervil 2017 EFN Chamaenerion angustifolium Fireweed 2017 Canaan Valley, WV Cyclanthera pedata Kaywa, Achocha, Slipper/Sparrow Gourd, Pepino,2016 TNelson Decaisnea fargesii Blue Bean 2016 CH Dicentra eximia Wild Bleeding Heart 2017 Dolly Sods, WV Diospyros virginiana Select American Persimmon 2017 Geranium maculatum Spotted Geranium 2017 GLP Gleditsia triacanthos Honey Locust (thornless) 2017 Bankhead NF Hablitzia tamnoides Caucasian Mountain Spinach 2016 CH Helianthus annuus Sunflower (dark center) 2017 MG Helianthus annuus Sunflower (light center) 2017 ZJE Helianthus tuberosus Sunroot, Jerusalem artichoke (true seed) 2017 ZJE-PA Helianthus tuberosus Sunroot, Jerusalem artichoke (true seed) 2017 ZJE-AL Hibiscus moscheutos Rosemallow (White) 2017 Patuxent Ipomoea pandurata Man-of-the-Earth, Wild Potato Vine 2017 GLP,Susq-PA Jeffersonia diphylla Twinleaf 2017 GLP Juglans ailantifolia Japanese Walnut 2017 Multiple Juglans ailantifolia var. cordiformisHeartnut 2017 Multiple Juglans nigra Select Black Walnut 2017 Juglans sp. Buartnut 2017 Multiple Juglans sp. Black-buartnut 2017 Laportea canadensis Wood Nettle 2017 WCC-DE Ligusticum canadense Eastern Osha, Boar Hog Root 2017 Pisgah WNC Maianthemum racemosum Solomon's Plume 2017 ZJE Medeola virginiana Cucumber root 2017 Celo WNC Medeola virginiana Cucumber root (jumbo) 2017 Money Rocks-PA Mertensia virginica Virginia Bluebells 2017 TN,PA Nelumbo lutea American Lotus 2016 AL Ocimum tenuiflorum Tulsi, Holy Basil 2017 ZJE Pediomelum subacaule Nashville Breadroot 2017 TN Perideridia americana Eastern yampah 2017 IL Petroselinum crispum Italian parsley 2017 ZJE-PA Petroselinum crispum Italian parsley 2016 ZJE-OR Phacelia purshii Miami Mist 2017 GLP Phaseolus polystachios Thicket Bean 2017 ZJE Phlox divaricata Woodland Phlox 2017 FWP-Drumore Phlox paniculata Fall Phlox 2017 WCC,GLP Physalis peruviana Inca berry, Cape Gooseberry 2015 ZJE Physalis pubescens "Aunt Molly" Groundcherry 2017 ZJE Physalis pubescens "Aunt Molly" Groundcherry 2015 ZJE Podophyllum peltatum Mayapple 2017 ZJE-PA Polygonatum biflorum (var. commutatum)Giant Solomon's Seal 2017 GLP,WCC-DE Quercus bicolor Swamp chestnut oak (sweet acorns) 2017 PA Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak 2017 JWH-PA Rudbeckia laciniata Cutleaf Coneflower, Sochan 2017 Patuxent Scutellaria lateriflora Skullcap 2015 MG Sium sisarum Skirret 2017 ZJE Solanum lycopersicum "Galina" early hardy tomato from Siberia 2017 EFN Solanum lycopersicum "Rosalita" red cherry tomato 2017 EFN Solanum lycopersicum Cherokee Black Tomato 2015 ZJE Spigelia marilandica Pinkroot, Indian Pink 2017 GLP Spigelia marilandica Pinkroot, Indian Pink 2016 ZJE Strophostyles umbellata Woolly Bean 2017 GLP Tiarella cordifolia Foamflower 2017 GLP Tithonia rotundifolia Mexican Sunflower, Red Sunflower 2017 GLP Trillium erectum Mixed Susquehanna Trilliums 2017 FWP-Drumore Vigna unguiculata Cowpea 2016 TNelson Withania somnifera Ashwaghanda 2016 CF-Murphy Xanthorhiza simplicissima Yellowroot 2015 MG.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status of the Umbelliferae Ssp. in Russia
    Status of the Umbelliferae ssp. in Russia Tatiana Khmelinskaya Olga Zvereva Anna Artemyeva The collection status The formation of Russian Umbelliferae collection had begun in 1923 after N.I.Vavilov visit West-European countries, USA and Canada (1921- 1922), from the seed samples shipped by breeding companies of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Austria. Russian resources were registered in VIR collection through All-Russian agricultural exhibition. The local landraces were collected during collection missions in Afghanistan, Iran, Armenia, Uzbekistan, Turkey, etc. In 1926 VIR scientists started to study the collection. From 1928 the new expeditions were arranged to Mediterranean countries, Ethiopia, and Western China by Vavilov, to India by Markovich, to Minor Asia of Zhukovskiy, etc. , and also collection had started to grow by exchange of material with different Institutes and companies. Now VIR Genebank contains genetic resources of different status from more than 90 countries, includes wild species, landraces, old and advanced cultivars, hybrids F1, breeding materials . Umbelliferae collections are divided into two parts: constant (base) catalogue and temporary catalogue. The constant catalogue includes landraces and breeding cultivars with sufficient quantity of seeds in accession. All accessions of constant catalogue are documented for computerized passport data. The temporary catalogue includes the hybrids F1, breeding materials and the samples with insufficient quantity of seeds. These latter cultivars need to
    [Show full text]
  • Seedling Establishment, Bud Movement, and Subterranean Diversity of Geophilous Systems in Apiaceae
    Flora (2002) 197, 385–393 http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/flora Seedling establishment, bud movement, and subterranean diversity of geophilous systems in Apiaceae Norbert Pütz1* & Ina Sukkau2 1 Institute of Nature Conservation and Environmental Education, University of Vechta, Driverstr. 22, D-49377 Vechta, Germany 2 Institute of Botany, RWTH Aachen, Germany * author for correspondence: e-mail: [email protected] Received: Nov 29, 2001 · Accepted: Jun 10, 2002 Summary Geophilous systems of plants are not only regarded as organs of underground storage. Such systems also undergo a large range of modifications in order to fulfill other ‚cryptical‘ functions, e.g. positioning of innovation buds, vegetative cloning, and vege- tative dispersal. Seedlings should always be the point of departure for any investigation into the structure of geophilous systems. This is because in the ability to survive of geophilous plants it is of primary importance that innovation buds can reach a safe position in the soil by the time the first period hostile to vegetation commences. Our analysis of such systems thus focused on examining the development of 34 species of the Apiaceae, beginning with their germination. Independent of life-form and life-span, all species exhibit noticeable terminal bud movement with the aid of contractile organs. Movement was found to be at least 5 mm, reaching a maximum of 45 mm. All species exhibit a noticeable contraction of the primary root. In most cases the contraction phenomenon also occurs in the hypocotyl, and some species show contraction of their lateral and / or adventitious roots. Analysis of movement shows the functional importance of pulling the inno- vation buds down into the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • 422 Part 180—Tolerances and Ex- Emptions for Pesticide
    Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) at any time before the filing of the ini- 180.124 Methyl bromide; tolerances for resi- tial decision. dues. 180.127 Piperonyl butoxide; tolerances for [55 FR 50293, Dec. 5, 1990, as amended at 70 residues. FR 33360, June 8, 2005] 180.128 Pyrethrins; tolerances for residues. 180.129 o-Phenylphenol and its sodium salt; PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EX- tolerances for residues. 180.130 Hydrogen Cyanide; tolerances for EMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEM- residues. ICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 180.142 2,4-D; tolerances for residues. Subpart A—Definitions and Interpretative 180.145 Fluorine compounds; tolerances for Regulations residues. 180.151 Ethylene oxide; tolerances for resi- Sec. dues. 180.1 Definitions and interpretations. 180.153 Diazinon; tolerances for residues. 180.3 Tolerances for related pesticide chemi- 180.154 Azinphos-methyl; tolerances for resi- cals. dues. 180.4 Exceptions. 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; tolerances 180.5 Zero tolerances. for residues. 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, 180.163 Dicofol; tolerances for residues. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of 180.169 Carbaryl; tolerances for residues. policy. 180.172 Dodine; tolerances for residues. 180.175 Maleic hydrazide; tolerances for resi- Subpart B—Procedural Regulations dues. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues. 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- 180.178 Ethoxyquin; tolerances for residues. emptions for pesticide residues in or on 180.181 Chlorpropham; tolerances for resi- raw agricultural commodities or proc- dues. essed foods. 180.182 Endosulfan; tolerances for residues. 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- 180.183 Disulfoton; tolerances for residues.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX for 2011 HERBALPEDIA Abelmoschus Moschatus—Ambrette Seed Abies Alba—Fir, Silver Abies Balsamea—Fir, Balsam Abies
    INDEX FOR 2011 HERBALPEDIA Acer palmatum—Maple, Japanese Acer pensylvanicum- Moosewood Acer rubrum—Maple, Red Abelmoschus moschatus—Ambrette seed Acer saccharinum—Maple, Silver Abies alba—Fir, Silver Acer spicatum—Maple, Mountain Abies balsamea—Fir, Balsam Acer tataricum—Maple, Tatarian Abies cephalonica—Fir, Greek Achillea ageratum—Yarrow, Sweet Abies fraseri—Fir, Fraser Achillea coarctata—Yarrow, Yellow Abies magnifica—Fir, California Red Achillea millefolium--Yarrow Abies mariana – Spruce, Black Achillea erba-rotta moschata—Yarrow, Musk Abies religiosa—Fir, Sacred Achillea moschata—Yarrow, Musk Abies sachalinensis—Fir, Japanese Achillea ptarmica - Sneezewort Abies spectabilis—Fir, Himalayan Achyranthes aspera—Devil’s Horsewhip Abronia fragrans – Sand Verbena Achyranthes bidentata-- Huai Niu Xi Abronia latifolia –Sand Verbena, Yellow Achyrocline satureoides--Macela Abrus precatorius--Jequirity Acinos alpinus – Calamint, Mountain Abutilon indicum----Mallow, Indian Acinos arvensis – Basil Thyme Abutilon trisulcatum- Mallow, Anglestem Aconitum carmichaeli—Monkshood, Azure Indian Aconitum delphinifolium—Monkshood, Acacia aneura--Mulga Larkspur Leaf Acacia arabica—Acacia Bark Aconitum falconeri—Aconite, Indian Acacia armata –Kangaroo Thorn Aconitum heterophyllum—Indian Atees Acacia catechu—Black Catechu Aconitum napellus—Aconite Acacia caven –Roman Cassie Aconitum uncinatum - Monkshood Acacia cornigera--Cockspur Aconitum vulparia - Wolfsbane Acacia dealbata--Mimosa Acorus americanus--Calamus Acacia decurrens—Acacia Bark Acorus calamus--Calamus
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Food Plant Use in 21St Century Europe: the Disappearance of Old Traditions and the Search for New Cuisines Involving Wild Edibles
    Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae Journal homepage: pbsociety.org.pl/journals/index.php/asbp INVITED REVIEW Received: 2012.07.20 Accepted: 2012.09.12 Published electronically: 2012.11.19 Acta Soc Bot Pol 81(4):359–370 DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2012.031 Wild food plant use in 21st century Europe: the disappearance of old traditions and the search for new cuisines involving wild edibles Łukasz Łuczaj1*, Andrea Pieroni2, Javier Tardío3, Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana4, Renata Sõukand5, Ingvar Svanberg6, Raivo Kalle7 1 Department of Botany and Biotechnology of Economic Plants, University of Rzeszów, Werynia 502, 36-100 Kolbuszowa, Poland 2 University of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele 9, 12060 Pollenzo, Cuneo, Italy 3 Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDRA), Finca “El Encín”, Apdo. 127, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Spain 4 Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain 5 Estonian Literary Museum, Vanemuise 42, 51003 Tartu, Estonia 6 Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Box 514, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden 7 Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Abstract The aim of this review is to present an overview of changes in the contemporary use of wild food plants in Europe, mainly using the examples of our home countries: Poland, Italy, Spain, Estonia and Sweden. We set the scene referring to the nutrition of 19th century peasants, involving many famine and emergency foods. Later we discuss such issues as children's wild snacks, the association between the decline of plant knowledge and the disappearance of plant use, the effects of over-exploitation, the decrease of the availability of plants due to ecosystem changes, land access rights for foragers and intoxication dangers.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Gaps in Traditional Vegetables Native to Europe and Fennoscandia
    agriculture Article Conservation Gaps in Traditional Vegetables Native to Europe and Fennoscandia Kauê de Sousa 1,2 and Svein Øivind Solberg 1,* 1 Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2318 Hamar, Norway; [email protected] 2 Bioversity International, 00054 Rome, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-7354-01516 Received: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 3 August 2020; Published: 6 August 2020 Abstract: Vegetables are rich in vitamins and other micronutrients and are important crops for healthy diets and diversification of the food system, and many traditional (also termed underutilized or indigenous) species may play a role. The current study analyzed 35 vegetables with a European region of diversity with the effort to map the conservation status in Fennoscandia and beyond. We mapped georeferenced occurrences and current genebank holdings based on global databases and conducted conservation gaps analysis based on representativeness scores in situ and ex situ. Out of the 35 target species, 19 got at a high priority score for further conservation initiatives, while another 14 species got a medium priority score. We identified a pattern where traditional vegetables are poorly represented in genebank holdings. This corresponds well to a lack of attention in the scientific community measured in number of published papers. Considering the grand challenges ahead in terms of climate change, population growth and demand for sustainability, traditional vegetables deserve greater attention. Our contribution is to provide a basis for conservation priorities among the identified vegetables species native to Fennoscandia. Keywords: crop wild relatives; ecosystem services; ensemble models; genetic diversity; plant genetic resources; species distribution models 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Origin and Importance of the Apiaceae Family
    1 TAXONOMY, ORIGIN AND IMPORTANCE OF THE APIACEAE FAMILY JEAN-PIERRE REDURON* Mulhouse, France The Apiaceae (or Umbelliferae) is a plant family comprising at the present time 466 genera and about 3800 species (Plunkett et al., 2018). It is distributed nearly worldwide, but is most diverse in temperate climatic areas, such as Eurasia and North America. It is quite rare in tropical humid regions where it is limited to high mountains. Mediterranean and arid climatic conditions favour high species diversification. The Apiaceae are present in nearly all types of habi- tats, from sea-level to alpine zones: aquatic biotopes, grasslands, grazed pas- tures, forests including their clearings and margins, cliffs, screes, rocky hills, open sandy and gravelly soils, steppes, cultivated fields, fallows, road sides and waste grounds. The largest number of genera, 289, and the largest generic endemism, 177, is found in Asia. There are 126 genera in Europe, but only 17 are en- demic. Africa has about the same total with 121 genera, where North Africa encompasses the largest occurrence of 82 genera, 13 of which are endemic. North and Central America have a fairly high level of diversity with 80 genera and 44 endemics, where South America accommodates less generic diversity with 35 genera, 15 of which are endemic. Oceania is home to 27 genera and 18 endemics (Plunkett et al., 2018). The Apiaceae family appears to have originated in Australasia (region including Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand, New Guinea, New Caledonia and several island groups), with this origin dated to the Late Cretaceous/ early Eocene, c.87 Ma (Nicolas and Plunkett, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Group Tables. Vegetables Group
    Environmental Protection Agency § 180.41 appropriate times, EPA will amend tol- dividual tolerances must be estab- erances for crop groups that have been lished. Miscellaneous commodities in- superseded by revised crop groups to tentionally not included in any group conform the pre-existing crop group to include asparagus, avocado, banana, the revised crop group. Once all of the fig, globe artichoke, hops, mango, pa- tolerances for the pre-existing crop paya, pawpaw, peanut, persimmon, group have been updated, the pre-exist- pineapple, water chestnut, and water- ing crop group will be removed from cress. the CFR. (c) Each group is identified by a (k) Establishment of a tolerance does group name and consists of a list of not substitute for the additional need representative commodities followed to register the pesticide under a com- panion law, the Federal Insecticide, by a list of all commodity members for Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. The the group. If the group includes sub- Registration Division of the Office of groups, each subgroup lists the sub- Pesticide Programs should be con- group name, the representative com- tacted concerning procedures for reg- modity or commodities, and the mem- istration of new uses of a pesticide. ber commodities for the subgroup. Sub- groups, which are a subset of their as- [60 FR 26635, May 17, 1995, as amended at 70 sociated crop group, are established for FR 33363, June 8, 2005; 72 FR 69155, Dec. 7, 2007; 75 FR 56014, Sept. 15, 2010] some but not all crops groups. (1) Crop Group 1: Root and Tuber § 180.41 Crop group tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and Their Regions of Diversity Second Edition Revised Of: A.C
    Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity Second edition revised of: A.C. Zeven and P.M. Zhukovsky, 1975, Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity 'N -'\:K 1~ Li Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity Excluding most ornamentals, forest trees and lower plants A.C. Zeven andJ.M.J, de Wet K pudoc Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation Wageningen - 1982 ~T—^/-/- /+<>?- •/ CIP-GEGEVENS Zeven, A.C. Dictionary ofcultivate d plants andthei rregion so f diversity: excluding mostornamentals ,fores t treesan d lowerplant s/ A.C .Zeve n andJ.M.J ,d eWet .- Wageninge n : Pudoc. -11 1 Herz,uitg . van:Dictionar y of cultivatedplant s andthei r centreso fdiversit y /A.C .Zeve n andP.M . Zhukovsky, 1975.- Me t index,lit .opg . ISBN 90-220-0785-5 SISO63 2UD C63 3 Trefw.:plantenteelt . ISBN 90-220-0785-5 ©Centre forAgricultura l Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen,1982 . Nopar t of thisboo k mayb e reproduced andpublishe d in any form,b y print, photoprint,microfil m or any othermean swithou t written permission from thepublisher . Contents Preface 7 History of thewor k 8 Origins of agriculture anddomesticatio n ofplant s Cradles of agriculture and regions of diversity 21 1 Chinese-Japanese Region 32 2 Indochinese-IndonesianRegio n 48 3 Australian Region 65 4 Hindustani Region 70 5 Central AsianRegio n 81 6 NearEaster n Region 87 7 Mediterranean Region 103 8 African Region 121 9 European-Siberian Region 148 10 South American Region 164 11 CentralAmerica n andMexica n Region 185 12 NorthAmerica n Region 199 Specieswithou t an identified region 207 References 209 Indexo fbotanica l names 228 Preface The aimo f thiswor k ist ogiv e thereade r quick reference toth e regionso f diversity ofcultivate d plants.Fo r important crops,region so fdiversit y of related wild species areals opresented .Wil d species areofte nusefu l sources of genes to improve thevalu eo fcrops .
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotanical Review of Wild Edible Plants of Slovakia
    Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae Journal homepage: pbsociety.org.pl/journals/index.php/asbp INVITED REVIEW Received: 2012.01.15 Accepted: 2012.08.26 Published electronically: 2012.11.16 Acta Soc Bot Pol 81(4):245–255 DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2012.030 Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants of Slovakia Łukasz Łuczaj* Department of Botany and Biotechnology of Economic Plants, University of Rzeszów, Werynia 502, 36-100 Kolbuszowa, Poland Abstract This paper is an ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants gathered for consumption from the 19th century to the present day, within the present borders of Slovakia. Twenty-four sources (mainly ethnographic) documenting the culinary use of wild plants were analysed. The use of 106 species (over 3% of the Slovak flora) has been recorded. Nowadays most of them are no longer used, or used rarely, apart from a few species of wild fruits. The most frequently used plants include the fruits of Rubus idaeus, Fragaria spp., Rubus subgenus Rubus, Vaccinium myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, Fagus sylvatica, Corylus avellana, Prunus spinosa, Pyrus spp., Malus spp., Crataegus spp. and the leaves of Urtica dioica, Rumex acetosa, Chenopodiaceae species, Cardamine amara, Glechoma spp., Taraxacum spp. and Oxalis acetosella. The most commonly used wild food taxa are nearly identical to those used in Poland, and the same negative association of wild vegetables with famine exists in Slovakia, resulting in their near complete disappearance from the present-day diet. Keywords: historical ethnobotany, ethnobiology, wild green vegetables, wild food plants, wild edible plants Introduction of rural populations started at the end of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 28 Autor(en)/Author(s): Budashkin Yuri I., Gaedike Reinhard Artikel/Article: Faunistics of the Epermeniidae from the former USSR (Epermeniidae) 123-138 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 28 (2): 123-138 123 Faunistics of the Epermeniidae from the former USSR (Epermeniidae) ^ YURIJ 1. BUDASHKIN ^ & REINHARD GaEDIKE ' Kurortnoje Biostantzija 98 / 99, Feodosija, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected] ^ Florusstraße 5, D-53225 Bonn, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. 26 species of Epermeniidae are recorded from the territory of the former USSR. Two of them (Epermenia wockeella und E. vartianae) are recorded for the first time. New distributional data for 1 1 species and new life history data for 5 species are given. The genitalia of the male of E. wockeella and female of E. vartianae are described and illustrated for the first time. Zusammenfassung. Es werden 26 Epermeniidae-Arten für das Gebiet der ehemaligen UdSSR nach- gewiesen, zwei von ihnen {Epermenia wockeella und E. vartianae) sind Erstnachweise. Für 11 Arten werden Neufunde und für 5 Arten neue Angaben zur Lebensweise gemacht. Die Genitalien der Männchen von E. wockeella und der Weibchen von E. vartianae werden erstmals beschrieben und abgebildet. Key words. Lepidoptera, Epermeniidae, former USSR, Epermenia wockeella, E. vartianae. Introduction The family Epermeniidae is the only representative of the superfamily Epermenioidea (sensu Kristensen 1999). The phylogenetic relationships with the other superfamilies of the Apoditrysia are still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency § 180.41
    Environmental Protection Agency § 180.41 to result in residues in a processed com- paya, pawpaw, peanut, persimmon, modity at a higher concentration than in the pineapple, water chestnut, and water- representative commodity. Residue data are cress. required on raw commodities derived from the crops in the crop group tolerance but not (c) Each group is identified by a directly covered by the tolerance. Animal group name and consists of a list of feeding studies with a representative crop representative commodities followed are required if the representative crop is by a list of all commodity members for used as a significant animal feed. the group. If the group includes sub- groups, each subgroup lists the sub- * * * * * group name, the representative com- modity or commodities, and the mem- § 180.41 Crop group tables. ber commodities for the subgroup. Sub- (a) The tables in this section are to groups, which are a subset of their as- be used in conjunction with § 180.40 to sociated crop group, are established for establish crop group tolerances. some but not all crops groups. (b) Commodities not listed are not (1) Crop Group 1: Root and Tuber considered as included in the groups for Vegetables Group. the purposes of this paragraph, and in- (i) Representative commodities. Carrot, dividual tolerances must be estab- potato, radish, and sugar beet. lished. Miscellaneous commodities in- (ii) Table. The following table 1 lists tentionally not included in any group all the commodities included in Crop include asparagus, avocado, banana, Group 1 and identifies the related crop fig, globe artichoke, hops, mango, pa- subgroups.
    [Show full text]