DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Thesis MASTER THESIS Titel der Master Thesis / Title of the Master‘s Thesis „Analysis of the Administration of Child Justice In Bhutan“ verfasst von / submitted by Kinzang Chedup angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2017 / Vienna 2017 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 992 884 Postgraduate programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Universitätslehrgang lt. Studienblatt / Human Rights Postgraduate programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. MMag. Dr.Christina Binder, E.MA List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution BNCA Bhutan Narcotic Control Agency CAAB Child Adoption Act of Bhutan CCPAB Child Care and Protection Act of Bhutan CCPCB Civil and Criminal Procedure Code of Bhutan CCPRR Child Care and Protection Rules and Regulations CICL Children in Conflict with the Law CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child CSO Civil Society Organisation GNH Gross National Happiness ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights NCWC National Commission for Women and Children OAG Office of the Attorney General PCB Penal Code of Bhutan RBP Royal Bhutan Police RCJ Royal Court of Justice RENEW Respect, Educate, Nurture and Empower Women RGOB Royal Government of Bhutan UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund WCPU Women and Child Protection Unit YDF Youth Development Fund YDRC Youth Development and Rehabilitation Centre i Table of Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................i Chapter One 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Problem Formulation ............................................................................................1 1.2 Rationale ...............................................................................................................6 1.3 Methodology .........................................................................................................8 1.4 Limitations ............................................................................................................9 Chapter Two 2.1 The concept of ‘Child’ in Bhutan- The Bhutanese Perspective ..........................10 2.2 The Evolution of Focus on Children in Bhutan ..................................................14 2.3 The Change from a Dutiful Child to a Right bearing Child Concept .................15 2.4 From the [Rights] of the Child to the [Duty] to Implement in Bhutan ...............16 Chapter Three 3.1 The International Dimension and Development of Child Justice .......................18 3.2 The Definition of [Child Justice] ........................................................................26 Chapter Four 4.1 International Standards and Norms on Child Justice ..........................................26 4.2 The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) .............27 4.3 UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice [Beijing Rules] ....................................................................................................29 4.4 UN Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures [ The Tokyo Rules]....................................................................................................................34 4.4.1 Pretrial Dispositions ...........................................................................................35 4.4.2 Sentencing Dispositions .....................................................................................36 4.4.3 Post-Sentencing Dispositions .............................................................................37 4.4.4 Recruitment and Staff .........................................................................................37 4.4.5 Policy Formulation .............................................................................................38 4.5 UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty, 1990 [The Havana Rules] ............................................................................................38 4.5.1 Deprivation of Liberty ........................................................................................39 4.5.2 Juvenile under arrest and awaiting trial ..............................................................40 4.5.3 Management of juvenile facilities ......................................................................40 4.5.4 Right to Education ..............................................................................................41 4.5.5 Recreation, practice of religion and medical care ..............................................42 4.5.6 Contact with the outside community ..................................................................43 4.5.7 Physical restraint and use of force ......................................................................43 4.5.8 Disciplinary process ...........................................................................................43 4.6 Guidelines for Action on Children in the Criminal Justice System, 1997 [The Vienna Guidelines] .....................................................................................44 4.6.1 Measures to be taken at the international level ...................................................46 Chapter Five 5.1 Legal Framework for the Protection of CICLs in Bhutan [Operational Legal Structure for Administration of Child Justice] ........................................47 5.1.1 The Constitution of Bhutan, 2008 ......................................................................49 5.1.2 The Child Care and Protection Act of Bhutan, 2011 ..........................................51 5.1.3 The Child Court Procedure 2015 ........................................................................52 5.1.4 The Civil and Criminal Procedure Code of Bhutan, 2001 .................................54 5.1.5 The Prison Act of Bhutan, 2009 .........................................................................55 5.1.6 The Penal Code of Bhutan, 2004 ........................................................................56 5.1.7 The Police Act of Bhutan, 2009 ..........................................................................56 Chapter Six 6.1 Child Justice System of Bhutan- [Functioning Modality of Child Justice in Bhutan] ...............................................................................................57 6.1.1 The [Child Bench] ..............................................................................................59 6.1.2 The Child Court Procedure .................................................................................60 6.1.3 Separate Child Judge [Child Bench Drangpon] .................................................60 6.1.4 [Friendliness] of the Court ..................................................................................61 6.1.5 [Judges] sensitised on Child Issues ....................................................................61 Chapter Seven 7.1. Rights of Children in Conflict with Law before the Bhutanese Justice System –A Legislative Achievement? ...............................................................62 7.1.1 Pre-Trial Rights of CICLs ..................................................................................63 7.1.2 Rights of CICLs during the [Trial] .....................................................................64 7.1.3 Post Trial Rights .................................................................................................66 Chapter Eight 8.1 Judicial Process for Administration of Child Justice in Bhutan. [How are Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law are Enforced through a Judicial Process] ..............................................................................................68 8.1.1 The Registration of the Case ..............................................................................69 8.1.2 Arrest of a Child .................................................................................................70 8.1.3 [Investigation] of the Child .................................................................................71 8.1.4 [Detention] of CICL before the Trial ..................................................................71 8.1.5 Production of CICL before the [Court] ...............................................................71 8.1.6 Formal Court Proceedings ..................................................................................72 8.1.7 Separate Hearings ...............................................................................................73 8.1.8 Legal Representation and [Legal Aid] ................................................................73 8.1.9 [Disposition] .......................................................................................................74 8.2 Award of judgment .............................................................................................74 8.2.1 Alternative Sentencing .......................................................................................75 8.2.2 Appeal .................................................................................................................76 Chapter Nine 9.1 The concept of Restorative Justice for Children in Bhutan [The understanding of child crime and justice]. How Restorative Practices
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effective Legal and Practical Measures in Combating Corruption
    139TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS EFFECTIVE LEGAL AND PRACTICAL MEASURES IN COMBATING CORRUPTION Tshering Namgyel* I. INTRODUCTION Corruption is a disease that is common in every country. However it varies from country to country depending upon the system of government, level of economic development, policy of the government and culture of the society. Although corruption is not seen in on an unmanageable scale it is prevalent Bhutan in all forms and at various levels, be it in government or the corporate and private sectors. Transparency International has placed Bhutan at number 46 amongst 180 countries in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI).1 With the transition of the government to constitutional parliamentary democracy, His Majesty the Fourth King felt it very important to prevent and eliminate corruption from the very beginning of his reign and decreed the establishment of an Anti-corruption Commission (ACC) on 31 December, 2006. Accordingly on 4 January, 2007 the ACC office was set up specifically as an agency to clean up corruption in Bhutan. Since its inception, the ACC has been actively involved in tracing corruption and bringing perpetrators to task, besides carrying out preventive and educational programmes. It has mainly devoted itself to developing baseline information on corruption; investigating cases; simplifying public delivery systems and asset declaration; education and advocacy on corruption; and studying the forms, causes and consequences of corruption.2 II. POLICIES AND INITIATIVES OF THE ROYAL GOVERNMENT His Majesty the Fourth King’s development philosophy of Gross National Happiness (GNH) has been enshrined in the constitution as the goal and pursuit of the government.3 In order to pursue this noble goal, anti-corruption measures are adopted through the policies of good governance by encouraging efficiency, accountability and transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transport Policy of Bhutan 2017 – Policy Protocol Report (Final Draft)
    National Transport Policy of Bhutan 2017 – Policy Protocol Report (Final Draft) National Transport Policy 2017 POLICY PROTOCOL REPORT National Transport Policy of POLICY PROTOCOL REPORT FINAL DRAFT Bhutan 2017 1 United Nations Development Programme June 2017 National Transport Policy of Bhutan 2017 – Policy Protocol Report (Final Draft) Disclaimer • The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. • We have prepared this report solely for the purpose of providing select information on a confidential basis to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) [in accordance with the contract dated 27 October 2016 executed between UNDP and us (“Contract”). • This report is confidential and for the use of UNDP and other Government Ministries and Government Agencies of Bhutan only. It is not to be distributed beyond the management nor is to be copied, circulated, referred to or quoted in correspondence, or discussed with any other party, in whole or in part, without our prior written consent. • This report sets forth our views based on the completeness and accuracy of the facts stated to KPMG and any assumptions that were included. If any of the facts and assumptions is not complete or accurate, it is imperative that we be informed accordingly, as the inaccuracy or incompleteness thereof could have a material effect on our conclusions. • We have not performed an audit and do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Its Impacts on Traditional Dispute Resolution in Bhutan
    Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 63 New Directions in Domestic and International Dispute Resolution 2020 Formalizing the Informal: Development and its Impacts on Traditional Dispute Resolution in Bhutan Stephan Sonnenberg Seoul National University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Stephan Sonnenberg, Formalizing the Informal: Development and its Impacts on Traditional Dispute Resolution in Bhutan, 63 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 143 (2020), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol63/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORMALIZING THE INFORMAL: DEVELOPMENT AND ITS IMPACTS ON TRADITIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN BHUTAN Stephan Sonnenberg* INTRODUCTION Bhutan is a small landlocked country with less than a million inhabitants, wedged between the two most populous nations on earth, India and China.1 It is known for its stunning Himalayan mountain ranges and its national development philosophy of pursuing “Gross National Happiness” (GNH).2 This paper argues, however, that Bhutan should also be known for its rich heritage of traditional dispute resolution. That system kept the peace in Bhutanese villages for centuries: the product of Bhutan’s unique history and its deep (primarily Buddhist) spiritual heritage. Sadly, these traditions are today at risk of extinction, victims—it is argued below—of Bhutan’s extraordinary process of modernization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary of the Kingdom of Bhutan
    The Judiciary of the Kingdom of Bhutan THE JUDICIARY OF THE KINGDOM OF BHUTAN HISTORICAL BACKGROUND - The Bhutanese legal system has a long traditional background, primarily based on Buddhist natural law and Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyal’s Code from early 17th century. The first comprehensive codified laws known as the Thrimzhung Chhenmo or the Supreme Law was enacted by the National Assembly during the Third Druk Gyalpo, His Majesty Jigme Dorji Wangchuck’s reign. MISSION, POLICIES & OBJECTIVES - The Judiciary aims to safeguard, uphold, and administer Justice fairly and independently without fear, favour, or undue delay in accordance with the Rule of Law to inspire trust and confidence and to enhance access to Justice. INDEPENDENCE - Among others, the independence of the Judiciary is manifested through: (a) Separation of judicial power from the apex to the lowest court; (b) Collective independence (the concept of non-interference, jurisdictional monopoly, transfer jurisdiction, control over judicial administration); (c) Institutional and financial independence; (d) Personnel independence (qualification, selection and training, conditions of services, suspension, removal and disciplinary measures. Security of tenure and protection from arbitrary removal from office); (e) Decentralization of all personnel administration and financial operations to respective courts; and (f) Distinctive court building, distinct kabney and court seal. JURISDICTION The Royal Court of Justice The judicial authority of Bhutan is vested in the Royal Courts of Justice comprising the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Dzongkhag Court and the Dungkhag Court. Other courts and tribunals will be established from time to time by the Druk Gyalpo on the recommendation of the National Judicial Commission. Additional Benches are established in some Dzongkhags and Dungkhags with higher caseload.
    [Show full text]
  • COIS Report Template Version 04 2006
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT BHUTAN 6 AUGUST 2010 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE BHUTAN 6 AUGUST 2010 Contents Preface Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Map ................................................................................................ …… 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................. 2.01 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ....................................................................... 4.01 Useful sources for further information....................................... 4.02 5. CONSTITUTION ...................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................ 6.01 Human Rights 7. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 7.01 8. SECURITY FORCES................................................................................. 8.01 9. MILITARY SERVICE................................................................................. 9.01 10. JUDICIARY........................................................................................... 10.01 Organisation ................................................................................. 10.01
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Service Statistics 2017
    CIVIL SERVICE STATISTICS DECEMBER 2017 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part I - Overview of the Report General 2 Civil Servants by Position Category and Position Level 2 Civil Servants by Employment Type 2 Civil Servants by Agency 3 Civil Servants by Dzongkhag 3 Civil Servants by Major Occupational Groups 3 Civil Servants by Gender 4 Civil Servants by Age Groups 4 Recruitment 4 Promotion 4 Separation 5 Regular Civil Servants by Qualification 5 Long-term Training 5 Secondment 5 Extra-Ordinary Leave 5 Volunteers 6 Part II – Detailed Statistics 7 General 7 Table 1: Summary 7 Table 2: Proportion of Civil Servants to Population 7 Table 3: Civil Servants by Position Category & Years of Service 8 Table 4: Royal Civil Service Award 2016 – Summary 8 Graph 1: Civil Service Staffing Trend from 1990 to 2017 9 Civil Servants by Position Category and Position Level Graph 2: Civil Servants by Position Category in Percentage 10 Graph 3: Civil Servants by Position Category from 2013 to 2017 10 Civil Servants by Employment Type Table 5: Civil Servants by Position Category and Employment Type 11 Table 6: Civil Servants by Working Agency and Employment Type 13 Table 7: Civil Servants by Parent Agency and Employment Type 17 Civil Servants by Agency Table 8: Civil Servants by Working Agency and Position Level 20 Table 9: Civil Servants by Parent Agency and Position Level 26 Table 10: Contract Employees by Working Agency and Position Category 30 Civil Service Statistics | i Table11: Civil Service Growth by Agency 33 Table 12: Progressive Growth of Civil Service strength by Parent Agency 35 Civil Servants by Dzongkhags Location Table 13: Civil Servants under Dzongkhag/Thromde Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations CEDAW/C/BTN/CO/7/Add.1
    United Nations CEDAW/C/BTN/CO/7/Add.1 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General 7 May 2013 of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Original: English English, French, and Spanish only ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Concluding observations on the seventh periodic report of Bhutan, adopted by the Committee at its forty-fourth session (20 July – 7 August 2009) Addendum Information provided by Bhutan on the follow-up to the concluding observations of the Committee* * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited. GE.13- CEDAW/C/BTN/CO/7/Add.1 Progress Report on Para 18 and Para 20 of the concluding observations of the CEDAW Committee Royal Government of Bhutan Progress report on Para 18 of the Concluding Observations The Committee requests that the State party implement, as a matter of urgency, sustained policies aimed at the promotion of women‟s full, active and equal participation in decision- making in all areas of public and political life. In particular, the Committee encourages the State party to review criteria required for certain positions when such requirements turn into obstacles or barriers to women‟s access to decision-making. It also recommends the use of temporary measures according to article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention and in the Committee‟s general recommendations Nos. 25 and 23. The Committee further recommends the implementation of awareness-raising activities about the importance of women‟s participation in decision-making positions during the current transition of society as a whole, including in its remote and rural areas 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiger Country
    CONSERVATION ACTION SERIES 20160423 TIGER COUNTRY Helping Save Bhutan’s Natural Heritage Department of Forests and Park Services Principal Investigator Vivek Menon Co-Principal Investigators Dr. NVK Ashraf and Dr. Jagdish Kishwan Project Team Radhika Bhagat, Jose Louies, Krishnendu Mondal, Debobroto Sircar, Amrit Menon, Prerna Panwar, Achintya Tripathi, Jeetendra Kumar and Vivek Menon Governing Council H.E. Lyonpo Yeshey Dorji, Minister of Agriculture and Forests, Royal Government of Bhutan Mr. Chencho Norbu, Director General, Department of Forests & Park Services (DoFPS) Mr. Sonam Wangchuk, Chief, Wildlife Conservation Division, DoFPS Mr. Vivek Menon, Executive Director, Wildlife Trust of India; Senior Advisor to the President, IFAW Mr. Kelvin Alie, Director, Wildlife Trade Program, IFAW Ms. Radhika Bhagat, Head, Wild Aid, Wildlife Trust of India Mr. Jose Louies, Head, Enforcement and Law, Wildlife Trust of India Mr. Tobgay Sonam Namgyal, Consultant for Bhutan, IFAW-WTI TIGER COUNTRY Helping Save Bhutan’s Natural Heritage Radhika Bhagat, Debobroto Sircar, Krishnendu Mondal, Achintya Tripathi, Jose Louies, Sonam Wangchuk, Vivek Menon, Kelvin Alie and Azzedine Downes Department of Forests and Park Services i The designations of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the authors or WTI concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) is a leading Indian Citation: Bhagat, R., Sircar, D., Mondal, K., nature conservation organisation committed to Tripathi, A., Louies, J., Wangchuk, S., Menon, V., the service of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Cyber-Security Capacity in the Kingdom of Bhutan
    Building Cyber-security Capacity in the Kingdom of Bhutan Drafted by: Taylor Roberts Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre University of Oxford 1 Table of Contents Assessment of Cyber-security Maturity Cyber-security Capacity by Factor Dimension 1: Cyber-security Policy and Strategy Dimension 2: Cyber-security Culture and Society Dimension 3: Cyber-security Education, Training and Skills Dimension 4: Legal and Regulatory Frameworks Dimension 5 - Standards, Organisations, and Technologies Recommendations Dimension 1 Capacity Gap – develop national cyber-security strategy Dimension 2 Capacity Gap – establish national cyber-security awareness campaign Dimension 3 Capacity Gap – public and private sector collaboration in the development of cyber- security curriculum and training Dimension 4 Capacity Gap – Ensure existing legislation reflects international commitments to combat cybercrime and investigation capacity is equipped to enforce legislation Dimension 5 Capacity Gap – Implement ISO standards in within the public sector, in consultation with the Central Bank, and provide incentives for a cyber-security market Conclusion Building Cyber-security Capacity in the Kingdom of Bhutan The Kingdom of Bhutan is undergoing a major shift with regards to its technological infrastructure. The government is updating its ICT Roadmap by June of this year, exploring an alternate submarine cable connection through Bangladesh and a new payment gateway, and is considering establishing a national data centre, among other initiatives. However, as Bhutan increases national investment into its ICT infrastructure, the risk of inadequate security mechanisms to protect these technologies simultaneously increases as well. It is important to understand the cyber-security capacity in Bhutan in order to invest effectively in both security and new technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report, 2018
    “Law is not confined to the courts or the legislatures that draft them. Law is like the air that every person breathes at every moment. Its presence is unnoticed but its absence will be lethal. We must respect law and law must be upheld without question just as we do not question the need to breathe.” st - His Majesty the Druk Gyalpo’s address to the National Judicial Conference on 21 July, 2010. ANNUAL REPORT 2018 | i “Mirror and Vajra” as office logo has religious and temporal or secular significance, historical bearing and legal relevance. The mirror symbolizes transparency, which reveals everything and reflects the actual deeds of a person irrespective of his/her representation. It is believed that Guru Rinpoche had used the Vajra to tame the devils. Analogically, Vajra symbolizes the indestructible, firmness and unwavering nature of law to tame the demonic forces and wrong doers. The caption “Seek Truth & Ensure Justice” below the pictorial logo signifies that the function of the Office of the Attorney General is to seek truth in every dispute/case and ensure that justice is sought through due process of law and lawful conduct of the State. The black colour in the background of the logo symbolizes the power of the authority to act. ANNUAL REPORT 2018 | ii TABLE OF CONTENT Attorney General’s Review 1 Vision 5 Mission & Values 6 Organization Chart 7 1. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 7 1.1 Prosecution and Litigation Division (PLD) 7 1.2 Property and Judgment Enforcement Section (PJES) 23 1.3 Media and Information Services 23 1.4 Library Section 24 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bhutan's Constitution of 2008
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:19 constituteproject.org Bhutan's Constitution of 2008 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:19 Table of contents Preamble . 4 Article 1: Kingdom of Bhutan . 4 Article 2: The Institution of Monarchy . 4 Article 3: Spiritual Heritage . 8 Article 4: Culture . 9 Article 5: Environment . 9 Article 6: Citizenship . 10 Article 7: Fundamental Rights . 10 Article 8: Fundamental Duties . 12 Article 9: Principles of State Policy . 12 Article 10: Parliament . 14 Article 11: The National Council . 15 Article 12: The National Assembly . 16 Article 13: Passing of Bills . 16 Article 14: Finance, Trade and Commerce . 17 Article 15: Political Parties . 17 Article 16: Public Campaign Financing . 19 Article 17: Formation of Government . 20 Article 18: The Opposition Party . 20 Article 19: Interim Government . 20 Article 20: The Executive . 21 Article 21: The Judiciary . 22 Article 22: Local Governments . 23 Article 23: Elections . 25 Article 24: Election Commission . 26 Article 25: The Royal Audit Authority . 27 Article 26: The Royal Civil Service Commission . 27 Article 27: The Anti-Corruption Commission . 28 Article 28: Defence . 28 Article 29: The Attorney General . 29 Article 30: The Pay Commission . 29 Article 31: Holders of Constitutional Offices . 29 Article 32: Impeachment . 30 Bhutan 2008 Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:19 Article 33: Emergency . 30 Article 34: National Referendum . 31 Article 35: Amendment & Authoritative Text . 31 Schedule 1: The National Flag and the National Emblem of Bhutan .
    [Show full text]
  • Thrims Khang and the Setting for Justice: the Spatial Evolution of the Courts of Justice in Bhutan
    Thrims khang and the Setting for Justice: The Spatial Evolution of the Courts of Justice in Bhutan Richard W Whitecross Introduction On 16 June 2014 a ceremony was held to inaugurate the new Supreme Court complex in Thimphu. The Supreme Court complex represents the most recent expression, if not the culmination, of a process of court design and judicial architecture in Bhutan. The evolution of the design and construction of Bhutanese courthouses1 is an important, if overlooked, feature of the modernisation of the Bhutanese legal system. Even more than the creation of new demarcated spaces for the operation, display and manifestation of judicial authority, the modern courthouses are part of a broader programme that underpins the ongoing process of democratisation. In this chapter, the role and function of the courthouse and courtroom in Bhutan is considered from a brief consideration of the dzongs established to secure the power of the Drukpa state, the changing engagement between ordinary people and the formal structures of the state and state law and the relationship between the Bhutanese state, its judiciary and foreign donors and advisors. The approach adopted in this chapter draws on studies on architecture, history and legal history and seeks to consider what new understandings can be gained in the development of court architecture as part of the promotion of the Rule of Law. This chapter intentionally draws on studies of court architecture from beyond Bhutan and the immediate region to illustrate how Bhutan has sought to accommodate, engage with and adapt to existing and emerging perspectives on court architecture and its presentation of judicial and state power.
    [Show full text]