Figure . Shirley Temple and Jack Haley in a Publicity Still for Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm (Dir

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Figure . Shirley Temple and Jack Haley in a Publicity Still for Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm (Dir Figure . Shirley Temple and Jack Haley in a publicity still for Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm (dir. Allan Dwan, US, ) Discipline and Pleasure: Shirley Temple and the Spectacle of Child Loving Kristen Hatch Contemporary viewers are likely to nd the image of Shirley Tem- ple riding Jack Haley perverse (g. ). Haley is on his hands and knees, straddled by the child, who swishes a riding crop against his backside and loosely holds a leather strap around his neck.1 Temple’s famous dimples and curls frame a face that seems too knowing for such a young girl. Her half- closed eyes look down slyly at the man, while her lips turn up into a disconcerting grin. How could we not see in this a pedophilic fantasy of domination and submission? And yet it is impossible to believe that Twentieth Century-Fox would deliberately stage its highest- grossing star in such a disturbing photograph. In The Structure of Scientic Revolutions, Thomas S. Kuhn draws upon Ludwig Wittgenstein’s discussion of the gestalt shift produced by a duck- rabbit — an image that appears as a duck or a rabbit depending on where one’s focus falls (g. ) — to describe the effects of a paradigm shift in scientic thinking. Practicing in different worlds, [the proponents of competing paradigms] see different things when they look from the same point in the same direction. Again, that is not to say that they can see anything Camera Obscura , Volume , Number ./- © by Camera Obscura Published by Duke University Press • Camera Obscura they please. Both are looking at the world, and what they look at has not changed. But in some areas they see different things, and they see them in different relations one to the other. That is why a law that cannot even be demonstrated to one group of Figure . Duck- rabbit. When focus falls to the left of the image, it appears scientists may occasionally seem 2 to be a duck. When focus falls to the intuitively obvious to another. right, it appears as a rabbit. Joseph Jastrow, “The Mind’s Eye,” Popular In other words, two groups Science Monthly () on opposite sides of a para- digm will look at the same image and see two completely differ- ent things. Each view is equally true because our paradigms are the frameworks through which we evaluate the veracity of a claim. For the same reason, it can be difcult to see the truths produced within paradigms we do not share or to see beyond the truths pro- duced by our own paradigms. The photograph of Temple riding Haley operates like the duck- rabbit, producing two entirely different sets of meanings, because our culture has undergone a paradigm shift regarding childhood. Whereas we now understand children to be imperiled by adult male sexuality, childhood innocence once seemed invio- lable. Just as it is very difcult for us to see anything other than pedophilia in this photograph, it would have been equally dif- cult for early twentieth- century audiences to see the same image as anything but benign. The man in the photo is white, well-dressed, and apparently middle class, with clean white cuffs held together neatly by cufinks, his curly hair tamed by a generous helping of pomade. He wears a suit, the uniform of the ofce rather than the home, and the two are posed as though caught in the act of play- ing horsey, a game in which the man submits his powerful body to the demands of the tiny child. It is a game that Temple played with adult male costars in several lms, in which this play signied the man’s capitulation to the child’s charms. For early twentieth- century audiences, the image is likely to have represented child lov- ing rather than pedophilia.3 And while audiences might have seen Discipline and Pleasure • submission in the image, this submission would not have conjured sexualized images of bondage and domination but rather would have suggested the man’s self-discipline. Given the prominent role that adult men played in Tem- ple’s lms and publicity, it is difcult not to read her as a “post– Production Code sex kitten” or the “Lolita of repressed Depression audiences.”4 However, this reading rests on an understanding of childhood and adult male sexuality that was not widely available to Depression- era audiences; Temple’s stardom relied on a refusal to recognize the possibility that white men might be aroused by the young girl. Certainly, an unwillingness to acknowledge white men’s capacity to sexually abuse children is dangerous. However, the dis- course of pedophilia is also dangerous. The endangered child is at the center of what Lauren Berlant identies as a discourse of “infantile citizenship” and what Lee Edelman polemically decries as the tyranny of futurity.5 The imperative to protect children from sexual danger, both real and imagined, has been the driving force behind a range of laws that work to limit sexual expression and curtail the rights of adults, particularly gay men, more than they do to protect children.6 Indeed, the numerous parallels in the devel- opment of legal and scientic discourses about homosexuality and pedophilia throughout the twentieth century should make us deeply suspicious of the idea of pedophilia that dominates political and popular discourse today. At the same time, the gure of the sexually endangered child forecloses the child’s own subjectivity, particularly with regard to sexuality. It is, therefore, important to denaturalize the gure of the imperiled, innocent child in order to drain it of its iconic power. One means of denaturalizing the iconic imperiled child is to situate this gure as the product of a paradigm that emerged at a specic historical moment rather than imagine it to be the expression of a timeless truth. In fact, Shirley Temple’s stardom stood at the juncture of two paradigms. It was built upon a fairly stable idea of adult male affection that had dominated publicity about girl stars in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. At the same time, it risked being undone by an emergent discourse of pedophilia and child endangerment, a discourse that Temple’s studio, Twentieth Century-Fox, actively worked to suppress. • Camera Obscura In this essay, I demonstrate that Temple’s stardom closely conformed to a model that had been developed in relation to girl stars during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a model in which male fandom prominently gured. Men played a central role in the publicity for these girl stars because men’s love for little girls was imagined to be socially productive rather than perverse; men’s child loving signaled their willingness to indulge in sentimental pleasures rather than sexual ones. Whereas mass culture was often accused of appealing to men’s libidinous desires, male fandom for child stars offered the promise that men were eager to indulge in a worshipful adoration of the child. In this sense, the girl star was imagined to serve a disciplinary function; stories abounded of men reformed by virtue of their love of little girls. Indeed, the fantasy of men enthralled by Shirley Temple was particularly appealing during the Depression. However, even as Shirley Temple was celebrated for her ability to lure men to the movie theater, a new paradigm was beginning to emerge, one that regured her sentimental appeal as sexual. A Very Healthy Sort of Worship When Shirley Temple initially emerged as one of Hollywood’s most popular stars, an adult man who did not adore Shirley Temple was perceived as somewhat aberrant. In , one news- paper columnist went in search of the rare man who was not a Temple fan. When he nally found one at the ofces of the New York Times, readers were assured, “He’s normal otherwise, he just doesn’t like Shirley Temple.”7 In fact, far from trying to obscure the elements of her films that seem perverse to contemporary audiences — her kissing and cuddling adult costars, crooning love songs to them, rubbing her dimpled cheeks against their grizzled ones — Twentieth Century-Fox deliberately marketed Temple’s lms as love stories between the girl and middle- aged men, going so far as to portray her as a little seductress who captures the hearts of her adult male coworkers as well as the men in the audi- ence. Newspaper ads for The Little Colonel (dir. David Butler, US, ) use photographs of Temple and Lionel Barrymore looking lovingly into one another’s eyes along with tag lines that describe Discipline and Pleasure • the pair as though they were star- crossed lovers: “She’s a child of the gallant South. He’s a crusty silver- haired veteran. Love tears them apart — then brings them together again!”8 The press- book offers advertisements that suggest romance as much as they do familial love: “He responds to her and gradually comes to love her, before he learns that she is his grandchild.” Likewise, Dimples (dir. William A. Seiter, US, ) was advertised as a love story between Temple and her costar, Frank Morgan: “A new somebody for her to love . and what fun he is! She’s an irresistible minstrel! He’s an incorrigible scamp! And even the rowdy Bowery can’t part these sweethearts.”9 Men’s adoration of Temple was not inciden- tal to her publicity but rather a central element of her stardom. It is worth examining why male fandom gured so prominently in Temple’s star discourse and what men’s pleasure in images of young girls signied to audiences who did not perceive it as a sign of pedophilic desire.
Recommended publications
  • Pilot Season
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College Spring 2014 Pilot Season Kelly Cousineau Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cousineau, Kelly, "Pilot Season" (2014). University Honors Theses. Paper 43. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.77 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pilot Season by Kelly Cousineau An undergraduate honorsrequirements thesis submitted for the degree in partial of fulfillment of the Bachelor of Arts in University Honors and Film Thesis Adviser William Tate Portland State University 2014 Abstract In the 1930s, two historical figures pioneered the cinematic movement into color technology and theory: Technicolor CEO Herbert Kalmus and Color Director Natalie Kalmus. Through strict licensing policies and creative branding, the husband-and-wife duo led Technicolor in the aesthetic revolution of colorizing Hollywood. However, Technicolor's enormous success, beginning in 1938 with The Wizard of Oz, followed decades of duress on the company. Studios had been reluctant to adopt color due to its high costs and Natalie's commanding presence on set represented a threat to those within the industry who demanded creative license. The discrimination that Natalie faced, while undoubtedly linked to her gender, was more systemically linked to her symbolic representation of Technicolor itself and its transformation of the industry from one based on black-and-white photography to a highly sanctioned world of color photography.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Wizard Of
    © 2014 Universal Uclick A 75-Year Enchantment from The Mini Page © 2014 Universal Uclick ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Can you finish these famous movie The Scarecrow (Ray Bolger), lines? the Cowardly Lion (Bert Lahr), Dorothy (Judy Garland) and the • “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Tin Man (Jack Haley) eagerly ________ anymore!” approach the Wizard. • “There’s no place like _________.” Actor Buddy Ebsen was cast • “I’ll get you, my pretty, and your as the first Tin Man. He inhaled little _______ , too!” the silver aluminum crystals dusted on his face and suffered • “Follow the __________ a severe reaction. He had to ____________ Road.” be in an iron lung, a machine “The Wizard of Oz” movie first lit to help him breathe, for two up movie screens in August 1939. weeks. The role of the Tin Man Seventy-five years later, it is still one was taken over by Jack Haley. The aluminum crystals were of the most beloved movies of all time. mixed with Haley’s makeup Say one of the movie lines above, and to form a paste. That way, he people know exactly what you mean. © 2013 Warner Bros Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved. Courtesy Home Video would not inhale the crystals. The Mini Page talked with an Oz American adventure Changing the story historian to celebrate the lasting power “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz” was The movie directors thought kids in of “The Wizard of Oz.” America’s first fairy tale, experts say. 1939 would not like magical worlds, Until that book, most kids’ books were so they turned Dorothy’s adventures Magical story by European authors, and lessons were into a dream.
    [Show full text]
  • Read It Here
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JACK HALEY, JR. PRODUCTIONS, ) INC., and KELLY BRANDT, as trustee ) of the Jack Haley, Jr. Trust and as executor ) of the Estate of Jack Haley, Jr., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) ) CASE NO. ______________ WARNER HOME VIDEO, a division ) of WARNER BROS. HOME ) ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ) WARNER BROS. PICTURES, a ) division of WB STUDIO ENTERPRISES ) INC., and WARNER BROS. ) ENTERTAINMENT INC., ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT COME NOW Deadline.comPlaintiffs Jack Haley, Jr. Productions, Inc. and Kelly Brandt, as trustee of the Jack Haley, Jr. Trust and as executor of the Estate of Jack Haley, Jr. (collectively, “Plaintiff”), and file this Complaint against Defendants Warner Home Video, a division of Warner Bros. Home Entertainment, Inc., Warner Bros. Pictures, a division of WB Studio Enterprises, Inc., and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (collectively, “Defendant” or “Warner”), as follows. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff Jack Haley, Jr. Productions, Inc. (“JHP”) is an entity incorporated in and maintains its principal place of business in the State of California. 2. Plaintiff Kelly Brandt is the trustee of the Jack Haley, Jr. Trust (the “Trust”) and executor of the Estate of Jack Haley, Jr. Prior to his death, Jack Haley, Jr. assigned all his rights, title, and interest in his shares of JHP to the Trust. The Trust was formed under the laws of California and Ms. Brandt serves as the trustee. Jack Haley, Jr. also appointed Ms. Brandt as the executor of the Estate of Jack Haley, Jr. Ms. Brandt resides in Topanga, California. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cozy up with a Movie Musical!
    AXS ENTERTAINMENT / ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT / PERFORMING ARTS Snowed In, Cleveland? Cozy Up With a Movie Musical! December 13, 2010 6:13 PM MST Snowed in? Why not check out some movie musicals?! Here are just a few popcorn-by-the-fire movie musical picks from each decade to keep you entertained during our crazy Cleveland weather! What are YOUR favorites? Let us know in the Comments section. - Anything Goes (1936) - Ethel Merman, Bing Crosby - Shall We Dance (1937) - Ginger Rogers & Fred Astaire - The Wizard of Oz (1939) - Judy Garland, Ray Bolger, Jack Haley, Bert Lahr, Frank Morgan - Road to Singapore (1940) - Bing Crosby, Dorothy Lamour, Bob Hope - On the Town (1949) - Gene Kelly, Frank Sinatra, Ann Miller) - Singin' In the Rain (1952) - Gene Kelly, Donald O'Connor, Debbie Reynolds - A Star is Born (1954) - Judy Garland, James Mason - Guys and Dolls (1955) - Marlon Brando, Jean Simmons, Frank Sinatra Vivian Blaine - West Side Story (1961) - Natalie Wood, Rita Moreno, Richard Beymer - My Fair Lady (1964) - Audrey Hepburn, Rex Harrison - The Sound of Music (1965) - Julie Andrews, Christopher Plummer - Man of La Mancha (1972) - Peter O'Toole, Sophia Loren - Grease (1978) - John Travolta, Olivia Newton-John - The Wiz (1978) - Diana Ross, Michael Jackson, Lena Horne, Richard Pryor - Little Shop of Horrors (1986) - Rick Moranis, Ellen Greene, Steve Martin - Labyrinth (1986) - David Bowie, Jennifer Connelly - Sister Act (1992) - Whoopi Goldberg, Kathy Najimy, Maggie Smith - Newsies (1992) - Christian Bale, David Moscow, Bill Pullman - Moulin Rouge! (2001) - Ewan McGregor, Nicole Kidman - Chicago (2002) - Catherine Zeta-Jones, Renée Zellweger, and Richard Gere, also featuring Queen Latifah, John C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloria Swanson
    Gloria Swanson: An Inventory of Her Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Swanson, Gloria, 1899-1983 Title: Gloria Swanson Papers [18--]-1988 (bulk 1920-1983) Dates: [18--]-1988 Extent: 620 boxes, artwork, audio discs, bound volumes, film, galleys, microfilm, posters, and realia (292.5 linear feet) Abstract: The papers of this well-known American actress encompass her long film and theater career, her extensive business interests, and her interest in health and nutrition, as well as personal and family matters. Call Number: Film Collection FI-041 Language English. Access Open for research. Please note that an appointment is required to view items in Series VII. Formats, Subseries I. Realia. Administrative Information Acquisition Purchase (1982) and gift (1983-1988) Processed by Joan Sibley, with assistance from Kerry Bohannon, David Sparks, Steve Mielke, Jimmy Rittenberry, Eve Grauer, 1990-1993 Repository: Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas at Austin Swanson, Gloria, 1899-1983 Film Collection FI-041 Biographical Sketch Actress Gloria Swanson was born Gloria May Josephine Swanson on March 27, 1899, in Chicago, the only child of Joseph Theodore and Adelaide Klanowsky Swanson. Her father's position as a civilian supply officer with the army took the family to Key West, FL and San Juan, Puerto Rico, but the majority of Swanson's childhood was spent in Chicago. It was in Chicago at Essanay Studios in 1914 that she began her lifelong association with the motion picture industry. She moved to California where she worked for Sennett/Keystone Studios before rising to stardom at Paramount in such Cecil B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Davis Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts
    Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts in America Southern Methodist University The Southern Methodist University Oral History Program was begun in 1972 and is part of the University’s DeGolyer Institute for American Studies. The goal is to gather primary source material for future writers and cultural historians on all branches of the performing arts- opera, ballet, the concert stage, theatre, films, radio, television, burlesque, vaudeville, popular music, jazz, the circus, and miscellaneous amateur and local productions. The Collection is particularly strong, however, in the areas of motion pictures and popular music and includes interviews with celebrated performers as well as a wide variety of behind-the-scenes personnel, several of whom are now deceased. Most interviews are biographical in nature although some are focused exclusively on a single topic of historical importance. The Program aims at balancing national developments with examples from local history. Interviews with members of the Dallas Little Theatre, therefore, serve to illustrate a nation-wide movement, while film exhibition across the country is exemplified by the Interstate Theater Circuit of Texas. The interviews have all been conducted by trained historians, who attempt to view artistic achievements against a broad social and cultural backdrop. Many of the persons interviewed, because of educational limitations or various extenuating circumstances, would never write down their experiences, and therefore valuable information on our nation’s cultural heritage would be lost if it were not for the S.M.U. Oral History Program. Interviewees are selected on the strength of (1) their contribution to the performing arts in America, (2) their unique position in a given art form, and (3) availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Glorious Technicolor: from George Eastman House and Beyond Screening Schedule June 5–August 5, 2015 Friday, June 5 4:30 the G
    Glorious Technicolor: From George Eastman House and Beyond Screening Schedule June 5–August 5, 2015 Friday, June 5 4:30 The Garden of Allah. 1936. USA. Directed by Richard Boleslawski. Screenplay by W.P. Lipscomb, Lynn Riggs, based on the novel by Robert Hichens. With Marlene Dietrich, Charles Boyer, Basil Rathbone, Joseph Schildkraut. 35mm restoration by The Museum of Modern Art, with support from the Celeste Bartos Fund for Film Preservation; courtesy The Walt Disney Studios. 75 min. La Cucaracha. 1934. Directed by Lloyd Corrigan. With Steffi Duna, Don Alvarado, Paul Porcasi, Eduardo Durant’s Rhumba Band. Courtesy George Eastman House (35mm dye-transfer print on June 5); and UCLA Film & Television Archive (restored 35mm print on July 21). 20 min. [John Barrymore Technicolor Test for Hamlet]. 1933. USA. Pioneer Pictures. 35mm print from The Museum of Modern Art. 5 min. 7:00 The Wizard of Oz. 1939. USA. Directed by Victor Fleming. Screenplay by Noel Langley, Florence Ryerson, Edgar Allan Woolf, based on the book by L. Frank Baum. Music by Harold Arlen, E.Y. Harburg. With Judy Garland, Frank Morgan, Ray Bolger, Bert Lahr, Ray Bolger, Margaret Hamilton, Billie Burke. 35mm print from George Eastman House; courtesy Warner Bros. 102 min. Saturday, June 6 2:30 THE DAWN OF TECHNICOLOR: THE SILENT ERA *Special Guest Appearances: James Layton and David Pierce, authors of The Dawn of Technicolor, 1915-1935 (George Eastman House, 2015). James Layton and David Pierce illustrate Technicolor’s origins during the silent film era. Before Technicolor achieved success in the 1930s, the company had to overcome countless technical challenges and persuade cost-conscious producers that color was worth the extra effort and expense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Littlest Rebel
    The Littlest Rebel By Edward Peple THE LITTLEST REBEL CHAPTER I Young Mrs. Herbert Cary picked up her work basket and slowly crossed the grass to a shady bench underneath the trees. She must go on with her task of planning a dress for Virgie. But the prospect of making her daughter something wearable out of the odds and ends of nothing was not a happy one. In fact, she was still poking through her basket and frowning thoughtfully when a childish voice came to her ears. "Yes, Virgie! Here I am. Out under the trees." Immediately came a sound of tumultuous feet and Miss Virginia Houston Cary burst upon the scene. She was a tot of seven with sun touched hair and great dark eyes whose witchery made her a piquant little fairy. In spite of her mother's despair over her clothes Virgie was dressed, or at least had been dressed at breakfast time, in a clean white frock, low shoes and white stockings, although all now showed signs of strenuous usage. Clutched to her breast as she ran up to her mother's side was "Susan Jemima," her one beloved possession and her doll. Behind Virgie came Sally Ann, her playmate, a slim, barefooted mulatto girl whose faded, gingham dress hung partly in tatters, halfway between her knees and ankles. In one of Sally Ann's hands, carried like a sword, was a pointed stick; in the other, a long piece of blue wood-moss from which dangled a bit of string. "Oh, Mother," cried the small daughter of the Carys, as she came up flushed and excited, "what do you reckon Sally Ann and me have been playing out in the woods!" "What, dear!" and Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebenslust Im Schatten Des Todes : Allan Dwans Action-Kino
    Lebenslust im Schatten des Todes : Allan Dwans Action-Kino Autor(en): Göttler, Fritz Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Filmbulletin : Zeitschrift für Film und Kino Band (Jahr): 44 (2002) Heft 238 PDF erstellt am: 04.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-865474 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch s Lebenslust im Schatten des Todes In Dwans Allan Dwan, 1910 bis i960: fünfzig Jahre Die Dwan-Filme der letzten Jahre, nach Filmen spricht Arbeit in Hollywood, fast ausnahmslos als 1950, das ist weder Altersweisheit noch das Kino allein Regisseur, Jahrzehnte hindurch einfach Film Abgeklärtheit eines gelebten Lebens, ist weder für sich selbst, an Film gemacht, die beiden letzten Jahre Finalität noch Philosophie.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA FESTIVAL of PRESERVATION MARCH 3 to MARCH 27, 2011
    UCLA FESTIVAL of PRESERVATION MARCH 3 to MARCH 27, 2011 i UCLA FESTIVAL of PRESERVATION MARCH 3 to MARCH 27, 2011 FESTIVAL SPONSOR Additional programming support provided, in part, by The Hollywood Foreign Press Association ii 1 FROM THE DIRECTOR As director of UCLA Film & Television Archive, it is my great pleasure to Mysel has completed several projects, including Cry Danger (1951), a introduce the 2011 UCLA Festival of Preservation. As in past years, we have recently rediscovered little gem of a noir, starring Dick Powell as an unjustly worked to put together a program that reflects the broad and deep efforts convicted ex-con trying to clear his name, opposite femme fatale Rhonda of UCLA Film & Television Archive to preserve and restore our national mov- Fleming, and featuring some great Bunker Hill locations long lost to the Los ing image heritage. Angeles wrecking ball. An even darker film noir, Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye (1950), stars James Cagney as a violent gangster (in fact, his last great This year’s UCLA Festival of Preservation again presents a wonderful cross- gangster role) whose id is more monstrous than almost anything since Little section of American film history and genres, silent masterpieces, fictional Caesar. Add crooked cops and a world in which no one can be trusted, and shorts, full-length documentaries and television works. Our Festival opens you have a perfect film noir tale. with Robert Altman’s Come Back to the 5 & Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean (1982). This restoration is the first fruit of a new project to preserve Our newsreel preservationist, Jeff Bickel, presents his restoration of John and restore the artistic legacy of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Hollywood, and the Crusades
    HISTORY, HOLLYWOOD, AND THE CRUSADES ________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston ________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts _______________ By Mary R. McCarthy May, 2013 HISTORY, HOLLYWOOD, AND THE CRUSADES ________________ An Abstract of a Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston ________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts _______________ By Mary R. McCarthy May, 2013 HISTORY, HOLLYWOOD, AND THE CRUSADES ______________________ Mary R. McCarthy APPROVED: ______________________ Sally N. Vaughn, Ph.D. Committee Chair ______________________ Martin Melosi, Ph.D. ______________________ Lorraine Stock, Ph.D. _______________________ John W. Roberts, Ph.D. Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Department of English ABSTRACT This thesis discusses the relationship between film and history in the depiction of the Crusades. It proposes that film is a valuable historical tool for teaching about the past on several levels, namely the film’s contemporaneous views of the Crusades, and the history Crusades themselves. This thesis recommends that a more rigid methodology be adopted for evaluating the historicity of films and encourages historians to view films not only as historians but also as film scholars. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my history teachers and professors over the years who inspired me to do what I love. In particular I am indebted to Mimi Kellogg and my thesis committee: Dr. Sally Vaughn, Dr. Martin Melosi, and Dr. Lorraine Stock. I am also indebted to my friends and family for their support and enthusiasm over the past few months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shape of Water (Guillermo Del Toro 2017)
    The Shape of Water (Guillermo del Toro 2017) Today, Mediático proudly celebrates its fourth birthday! As our readership tops 50,000, we, its editors, would like to say a big THANK YOU to our amazing co-authors, our editorial board and readers for four wonderful years of posts and feedback. We raise a glass to you and toast the next four (or more) glorious years of news and research and views on Latin American, Latinx and Iberian media. We present today a special birthday post from one of our co-editors, Dolores Tierney on Guillermo del Toro’s The Shape of Water. Tierney is Senior Lecturer in Film at Sussex University and has just finished a book on Latin America’s transnational auteurs (including del Toro). She is currently on leave in Washington DC. Del Toro’s acceptance speech at the 75th Golden Globes The Shape of Water By Dolores Tierney “Hello déjà vu! It’s you again!” After last week’s thirteen Oscar nominations for The Shape of Water, for the fourth time in five years, a Mexican director looks a likely shoe-in for the Oscar for Best Director. If del Toro wins Best Director he will be the third Mexican (and Latin American) to have done so ever; Alfonso Cuarón won it in 2014 for Gravity, Alejandro González Iñárritu won it in 2015 and 2016 for Birdman and The Revenant. As in the previous few years with Iñárritu, I’ve been pondering what so many Oscar nominations –and success in other awards (Golden Globes, Venice, Critics Choice) means for the auteurist summation I have made of del Toro’s work previously (in an anthology co-edited with Deborah Shaw and Ann Davies) and in my forthcoming book New Transnationalisms in Contemporary Latin American Cinemas.
    [Show full text]