CEU eTD Collection In requ fulfillmentof the partial The C M ase of the of ase ULTIPLE ULTIPLE 2011 Hungarian 2011 D Submitted toCentralSubmitted European University IMENSIONS OF I S Department ofPoliticalScience T irements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Political forirements Master thedegreeArts in of of Professor Matteo Fumagalli HERE A HERE Budapest, Hungary Aniko To Supervisor: (2 C (201 - H OMMON by year) Higher Education Higher Education IGHER IGHER 4
) th
G E DUCATION OAL
?
Policy Reform P : OLICY
s
CEU eTD Collection familysupport and their love for S development thesis. ofthis class their Lazerson because Marvin Professor and MateiLiviu thankf also am I work. my on suggestions important and guidance, support, his for Fumagalli Matteo Professor supervisor thesis my thank to like would I all, of First advancement of thepolicy three the of assessment combined the on based and gap, the reveals thesis The reforms. the by unresolved remains policy a of existence the suggesting policy education higher of patterns global and proposition Hungary) in education higher and (students levels micro and education) higher Hungarian of aspects p (social, meso policy), education higher of patterns European and (global macro The policies. the of effectiveness the assess to and to linked are reforms the dimensions different the reveal to approach structural a applying reforms education higher Hung 2011 the of case the on focuses thesis The towards. head should education higher relations shifting As massification. g of effects the by shaped been has education Higher pecial thanks to Josip to thanks pecial equipped me with the skills to study higher education and it it and education higher study to skills the with me equipped r revisited are states
among that there is a mismatch between t between mismatch a is there that rsl, hr ae aiu saeodr i hge euain n tee are there and education higher in stakeholders various are there result, a a for her he her for a
their epn te eom te eurn rfrne point. reference recurring the reforms the keeping . -
levels of of levels
interests, which can generate can which interests, .
A lp CKNOWLEDGMENTS and for her friendship. Finally, friendship. her for and t he A BSTRACT nlss i sget rcmedtos on recommendations suggests it analysis, i
he Hungarian policies and the European European the and policies Hungarian he
lobalization, Higher Education and Public Policy Public and Education Higher
different takes on what direction what on takes different ltcl lgl ad economic and legal, olitical, also
I would like to thank to like would I interna contributed a lot to the the to lot a contributed inlzto, and tionalization, ul for ul
h main The Professor - gap that gap arian my the the CEU eTD Collection ReferenceList Appendix Chapter 6. Chapter 5.Findings Chapte Chapter 3. Methodologyand Research Design Chapter Chapter 1. List ofAbbreviations List List ofTables Acknowledgments Abstract 5.2 5.1 4.3 4.2 Opportunities, and European Competitiveness 4.1 2.2 2.1 of Figures 4.2.4 4.2.3 Education System 4.2.2 4.2.1
2013) 4.2.4.3 2011 4.2.4.2 4.2.4.1 r 4. Macro, Meso, andr 4.Macro, Meso, Micro
2. Literature2. ofHigher Dimensions Review: andEducation Education Higher Policy ...... Higher of EducationPolicyContext Hungary: andPresent Past GlobalEducation, Patternsand Economic theEuropean UnionContext: Central EducationPolicy Elements ofHigher Patterns ofIt Today‟s EducationSystem:Is Higher WhereHeading to? Policy Recommendations DefiningAssessing theReforms, the Gap Perceptions Mapping Students‟
......
Conclusions Introduction -
April 2012)April
TheHigher Policy 2011Act Education on ofthe CCIV Evolution The Environment Political Demographics: andEconomic ofthe The Social Hungarian Framework Higher LegalThe Hungarian Frameworkof Education Higher
......
...... Public Reception and Modific Plans Practice:in The2011 Actof CCIV Széll andthe Kálmán 2.0 Plan (December Preparations and Plans (December 2010 ......
......
......
......
......
...... T ......
...... - ABLE OF level Environment of theHungarian Case Environment level ......
...... ations: Can There BeaConsensus? (July 2012 ......
...... ii C
...... ONTENTS ......
...... - ......
...... April 2011)April - ...... making ......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...... - ...... May ......
69 67 64 64 50 35 34 29 26 26 19 19 11 45 43 35
iii iii iv V
7 5 5 1
I i i
CEU eTD Collection education Figure 5.Stud communication explaining the justificationof theintroduction of thereforms. Figure 4.Question 3:Pleasemeasures evaluate the from following taken government to state Figure 3.Comparing applicants, the number ofapplicants, andapplicants admitted Figure HUF 2.Government(2005education inmillion expenditure onhigher unemployed status ofFigure pe 1.Distribution Table policy and 11.Defining explaining gaps Table ofstudentopin 10.Question 8:Assessment applying abroad higher education for Tableexpected 9. Questioneffect 6:Theabolishment ofquota ofpeople onthenumber of policyTable 8. Question 4:Assessing measures program* Table education onenrollment 7. Questionofrespondents inhigher 1:Number based Table 6. Policyevolution ofthe 2011reforms strategy (2010 Table 5. The Table of 4. Distribution quotabefore andreforms afterthe Table 3. Patterns ofstate Table change 2. Population inHungary2012 cohorts onage based in2001and Table 1. Research design - funded places in Hungaryfunded application duringthe places in standard (2001 period
...... policy environment accordingenvironment Fidesz policy the to ent contractexpected andits on the effect - 2014)
......
...... -
...... funded places (2005 ople basededucational attainmentinterms of employed on and
...... L
...... L IST OF ...... IST OF ......
...... - iii
...... 2013) F T
...... IGURES ABLES ions ......
......
...... number of people applyingnumber higher ofpeople for -
......
KDNP reform government‟s
...... -
...... 2013) - ...... 2013)
......
......
......
58 56 33 32 31 66 60 58 57 54 49 41 37 36 29 17
CEU eTD Collection VET Education OFÉSZ OECD NEET MSZP MDF KDNP IMF IT Unions Student HÖOK HEP HEI HE HaHa Fidesz FIDESZ EU EC – – – –
– Information Technology –
– – European Commission higher education European Union
–
–
higher educationhigher institution
International Fund Monetary – – – higher education policy
Vocational Education andVocational Training Education – –
– Magyar Demokrata ForumofHungarian Fórum; Dem
– Hallgatói Hálózat; Student Network Student Hálózat; Hallgatói
People neitheremployedengagede nor in Magyar Párt; Hungarian Szocialista Party Socialist Magyar Párt; Fidesz Polgári –
Organization for EconomicOrganization for Co Keresztényd
Hallgatói ÖnkormáHallgatói
Országos Felsőoktatási Érdekvédelmi Szövetség;
Fiatal DemokratákS
emokrata
nyzatok Konferenciája; Országos
zövetsége; ofYoung Alliance Democrats Néppárt L
IST OF
–
Hungarian ; - operation andoperation Development Christian DemocraticChristian Party People‟s A
BBREVIATIONS iv
Civic AllianceCivic ducation or training
National for Alliance Higher
ocrats National ConferenceNational of
CEU eTD Collection traditional context, education higher European level policy Hungarianalso the of to but (HEP) returnedconditions areThe contract. tothesetwithin state.frameworka student of requirement the case In studies. their of length the on based employment Hungarian in engage to obliged state with students Basically, employment. and education funded education higher on B funding significantly. decreased state as withdrawal state about brought intervention state Interestingly, education. of quality and accessfunding, of issues in intervention state increased and raisedmobilized t became students sphere, domestic the Within concerns. expressed both criticism domestic reforms Plan ( deficit budget as communicated were reforms the of Most reforms. governmental proposed the out carry to easier it made after i reforms structural various
the 2.0 for various reasons. First, they brought about specific measures unusual not only to the the onlyto not unusual measures specific about theybrought First, reasons. various for The reforms provide basis for contributing to the literature of higher education policy education higher of literature the to contributing for basis provide reforms The state traditionally the short, In 2010 the During
” ee oe f h ms dbtd oiy esrs nrdcd Itrainl and International introduced. measures policy debated most the of some were 2010 elections 2010 dramatic
ly 2012). As part of a complex education reform package, the 2011 higher education higher 2011 the package, reform education complex a of part As 2012).
state s o flild ihn 0 er atr rdain cs o euain a t be to has education of cost graduation, after years 20 within fulfilled not is “ Sz -
funded higher education system education higher funded part of a debt management action plan to decrease state debt and state state and debt state decrease to plan action management debt a of part é state withdrawal from funding funding from withdrawal state ll K ll heir voice thechanges. against á - where lm 04 oenet yl te Fidesz the cycle government 2014 sds oe lmn o te eom cetd ln bten state between link a created reforms the of element one esides, á Hnay Te conservative The Hungary. n n Plan n C they HAPTER ”
achieved 2011; - fun 1.
“ e hge euain ytm a rfre by reformed was system education higher ded National Reform Program Reform National
I 1 NTRODUCTION a 2/3 majority 2/3 a
that
represented
developed in the last two decades. The The decades. two last the in developed
government
- in KDNP government introduced introduced government KDNP
the diffe a - - making. InHungarian the making. Parliament. funded statuses are now now are statuses funded ”
coalition was formed formed was coalition 2011; 2011; et ah ie the given path rent “
Sz The majority The é ll K ll
á lm á n -
CEU eTD Collection http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/eurypedia_en.php. 2 http://www.kormany.hu/hu/emberi 1 policy education higher Hungarian on literature the to contributes in and dimensions different the harmonize to becomes it difficult more the involved, are aspects more the However, agenda. political the within field policy key a become has which policy, perspective of the from important also is policies the of discourse the Finally, policy. the of outcome current Plan Kálmán (“Széll a as program their to referred communication government the fact, In policy a indicating versions chan the for reasons main two were There conditions cannot inEurope befound However, stude to similar sanctions or fees tuition high either are there states other European in argues, Resource Human of Ministry the As time. of length fix a for Hungary in th is Europeans education higher to access increasing Euro the At system. Hungarian the to unfamiliar also was state the of interests economic on based fund state of redistribution of degree high
“Eurydice “Kormányzat terests. e student contract, which binds students with state with students binds which contract, student e h cs she case The Second measure policy The - The
Eurypedia completing tertiaryeducation. h suy f uoen ihr dcto sses hw that shows systems education higher European of study the -
Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma Minisztériuma EmberiErőforrások
the , within approximately one year, approximately, within the one reform case justification ofof thereforms public reception. and justification -
also Descriptions of National Education Systems and National of Descriptions ” s ih on light ds
2011). 2011). elcs n st f pca plc maue a te tt lvl and level state the at measures policy special of set a on reflects
- -- uncommon uncommon making approach that tried to do the most within the shortest time. withinshortest the the most do to tried that approach making miniszteriuma/hirek/a The second reason is that is reason second The
h mlil dmnin o cneprr hge education higher contemporary of dimensions multiple the 2 .
both to
-
Hírek.” Accessed May 10, 2014. May 2014. Accessed 10, Hírek.” ges: first, amendments often came in rudimentary rudimentary in came often amendments first, ges: reach the Europe 2020 goal of having 40% of of 40% having of goal 2020 Europe the reach to - 2 hallgatoi the Hungarian and and Hungarian the
en ee, h ojcie ae etrd to centered are objectives the level, pean - osztondij
- criticism sponsored places to seek employment employment seek to places sponsored s were times. modified numerous Policies.” Accessed May 10, 2014. Accessed 2014. Policies.” May10, - szerzodes made its way and shaped the the shaped and way its made - to making. making. the European legislation legislation European the
- nem „ now or never chance never or now - roghoz Besides, the topic the Besides, the very same same very the - kotes. t contracts nt
1 ‟ .
CEU eTD Collection and ideology the about more reveal to justificat governmental approach discursive a include will analysis meso The point. reference recurring a as reforms the of content the keeping revisited be andeducation) Hungarian micro higher of aspects economic and legal, political, (social, meso policy), education higher of patterns European and (global macro The to. linked are reforms the dimensions different the revealing remaining policy gap? asking: by effectiveness investigates question research second The 2003). (Tight, effective is policy given a whether is questions important most the of one specifically, policy education higher study To 2010). al et (Altbach states of integration and interaction encourages that and social, to is trend general the because matters Compliance policy education higher of directions international with comply case Hungarian case the how investigates question mi and meso, macro, by shaped were events how expl and case the of contradictions the about more reveal helps picture larger a creating p decision of type instance well. as policy, education higher on and education higher on literature general the to contributes thesis the Therefore, to. heading to linked is rogram To answer the research questions research the answer To impossible is toassess it point, long At this
s of a two a of
but also
economic the larger - - aig process making
thirds majority policy majority thirds on the dynamics policy on the of
- development;
scale debates as to what boundaries HEP has and has HEP boundaries what to as debates scale ion of the policies. Finally a survey methodology will be added to the to added be will methodology survey a Finally policies. the of ion are the 2011 higher education reforms effective and is there a a there is and effective reforms education higher 2011 the are support
all three being key concepts of today‟s globalized world globalized today‟s of concepts key being three all s eae t tee iesos y asking: by dimensions these to related is
n addition, In levels (students and higher education in Hungary) will inHungary) will education (students andhigher levels - making wi making ,
s the methodology the
- ute research further making under supermajoritymaking rule. 3
-
te thin a parliamentary system parliamentary a thin
use cro rm effects of theeffects measures. Nevertheless, rm of as
- higher education as means of cultural, cultural, of means as education higher the Hungarian reforms represent an an represent reforms Hungarian the level dimensions. The first research research first The dimensions. level
co o only not nsist .
s 2012;
of a structural approach approach structural a of n ugra reform Hungarian on
D what direction it is it direction what e Wit and Adams and Wit e
; how does the the does how studying - making? - level
this this ain
CEU eTD Collection level and education advance to added be will recommendations policy Moreover, policy. the in gaps identified the and levels three the of assessment the provide will Findings policies. education higher shaping dimensions multiple the on understanding and trends supranational state the refo education higher of dimensions related the and case the between connection the about more reveal to approaches different combining debated inthe policyamendments. remained element after even most the Interestingly, introduction. their since evolved reforms the extent what to and how refo the of effectiveness overall the Thus, included. not still were problems the articulated of initially some reforms; the of version first the about opposition to due measures alignment it that shown policy a of existence the suggests This policies Hungarian the of the currenteducation system higher Hungary. in students of analysis level micro rms and identify and rms show will evolution policy The sufficient. not clearly was introduction of time the at rms In proposition main The - level analysis of the reforms. However, it will be will it However, reforms. the of analysis level to the system u, th sum,
s not is Europe
in light of the fin the of light in tei wl cet a opeesv understanding comprehensive a create will thesis e s the imply a case of non of case a imply
an Union an took and the European and global patterns of higher education policy. education higher of patterns global and European the and took
policy gaps that remain. The focus of the thesis will be centered to to centered be will thesis the of focus The remain. that gaps policy to
the micro the
states
‟ -
focused ofhigher educationliterature policy perspectives to measure their assessment of the reforms and reforms the of assessment their measure to perspectives dings. As a result, the thesis contributes thesis the result, a As dings. that there i there that - - level of Hungarian students Hungarian of level gap that remains unresolved by the reforms. It will be be will It reforms. the by unresolved remains that gap - oiy a wl a t ass te fetvns o the of effectiveness the assess to as well as policy, - alignment because after introducing a number of of number a introducing after because alignment 4 s an expected mismatch between the between mismatch expected an s
the framework of the Hungarian higher higher Hungarian the of framework the linked to the analysis of analysis the to linked
i n order order n
to create a better better a create to both - of the reforms, reforms, the of making. to the to
the global, global, the
directions
state - CEU eTD Collection to from higher to relates globalization globalization. by processes induced specific the to respond to education higher for challenges are there result, a As educat higher way the is internationalization while actor, an is it which in and responds, education higher which to process political and economic, competition. cooperationand making institutions of and programs a Massification and information new of theEnglishlanguage, economy, world role the network, integrated knowledge international an of emergence the technology, communications “increasingly the of outcome argument, this perspective mechanism circular a by maintained ones. material to constructs abstract from 2.1 elite n C
respond to
HAPTER globalization G Knight of Patterns
(Musselin and Teixeire2014, and (Musselin rvlg t a ulc ass public a to privilege lobalization lobalization emphasizing integration and interaction as interaction and integration emphasizing
these changes (Gibb etal 2. refers to refers n Atah 20) define (2007) Altbach and Altbach
L
ITERATURE and second, it explores it second, and T resulted in resulted oday’s oday’s
growing
and other forcesthecontrol(32). beyond ofacademic institutions” t al. et Accordingly, t Accordingly,
Conseq . As De WitDe As H Higher Education Education Higher S (2012 education.
IGHER R participation the et. EVIEW massification and internationalization of internationalization and massification d ) connects that Massification 1) . ety fnig a become has funding uently,
2013, 15 . efine E
he literature can be divided to two themes as to how to as themes two to divided be can literature he and Adams (2010) sum up: sum (2010) Adamsand In case of internationalization, ofIn case
: DUCATION
Fi
lblzto a a lw f ifrn uis ranging units different of flow a as globalization D the ways the h bod osnu are that agrees consensus broad The s,i xlrs changes explores it rst, , ie. ,
I MENSIONS OF globalization 5
-
16). 16). the transformation of higher education from education higher of transformation the the world. Gürüz (2008) adds an economic an adds (2008) Gürüz world. the
also internationalization internationalization
ystem: P equally important asset important equally OLICY ruh aot h expansion the about brought ion r ion
in esponds to and acts in it” in acts and to esponds
W H ihr dcto (HE) education higher
IGHER here here
oe eta fr policy for central more “globalization is a social,ais “globalization needed by and by needed Is I
theyk E has become the way the become has t DUCATION
H higher education. higher
eading to lblzto is globalization ey elements are elements ey s . In line with with line In
resulting
AND f HE of as the the as ( 221) ?
- .
CEU eTD Collection higher educationin supervisor a in resulted which that is trend current system (Olsen autonomy external hig of dependence as directly more rephrased be can influence individua and affairs international ext of importance a is There 2009, 4). economic (“ transaction” all and consumption, of production, chargeas such “takeactivities they as production of factors these to central are Humans capital human ca output become which after skills) developing papers, writing evaluated, being classes, (completing products s Accordingly, 15). 2013, al. et (Gibb way” entrepreneurial 2014 institut education and consumer a of position student the puts education higher international and global on understanding modern institutio ia b e by pital ).
h state The important An is also determinative. also is Also, graduates are expected to “think and act both locally and globally in an an in globally and locally both act and “think to expected are graduates Also,
actors who actors s beca ns
(Mark
wfl cag i te rdtoa mnplsi relationship monopolistic traditional the in change twofold uain Mlsot e al. et (Molesworth ducation ,
s
which is related to “factors of production used to create goods or services”. services”. or goods create to used production of “factors to related is which
2013 e at f cmeiie market competitive a of part me of higher education higher of
-
ra atr hs rw. Second grown. has actors ernal 200 stitutions
ihr dcto institution education higher might might
). In that In ). tts ae hne ter oiin ad ae p oe f hi power their of some up gave and positions their changed have states 5 n related and . However, ). represent a potential threat to academic freedom and freedomacademic to threat representpotential a (Mass
In model, students represent an input input anrepresent students model, - like position position like that case th case that e en 200 ucm of outcome . l
eedne on dependence Students are also managers investing into their human human their into investing managers also are Students ihr dcto institutions education higher 0 2010 , 377 e „power of the purse‟ the of „power e for the state and state the for ions 6
19 while 159) , dimension - 383). into the position of position the into hs proc these tee rus ae igr nlec on influence bigger have groups these , ihn a within h state the
is also impacted by the changes. changes. the by impacted also is
esses nweg society knowledge more institutional autonomy institutional more u
tudents ieste are niversities n pbi hge education higher public a in Insights: her education institutions on institutions education her subject to a complex process complex a to subject
dictates. is
providers (Mass that a be can
OECD .
First, the overall overall the First, ihr education higher Nevertheless, the the Nevertheless, e n 2000) en
the
to interpreted (Naid .
Publication institutional In fact, the the fact, In ore of sources oo
. n the in
et al. al. et they The The for for as ” ,
CEU eTD Collection to tend spending research among funding Feldman and (McLendon Politics policy. funding Ness policy education higher of f fact, In 2014). playsetting an important rolein higher public quality and autonomy institutional elements 2.2 massificationglobalization, and internationalization of higher education. However relations. power shifting experiencing are them of some and other each to connected strongly are stakeholders these of Some interests. multiple with stakeholders multiple to linked be can competitivenes entrepreneurship, education over supervision of terms in and Program, Bologna interested more supranation the within
and Tandberg (2013) provide a provide (2013) Tandberg and In Europe, state funded public higher education is the prevailing model (Casani et al. al. et (Casani model prevailing the is education higher public funded state Europe, In Although Elements of Central E Higher a state, the and institutions between shift the to Similarly al ,
f ihr dcto policy education higher of ( “ Project Report Project o tee tkhles n their and stakeholders these of l
education 06, h blne w balance the 2006), unding in higher education both in term in both education higher in
hr hv be sit in shifts been have there e h mai the be
al is one of the of one is
- ae place takes
ainl ieso i Europe in dimension national ” . Policy discussions start from funding issues and return to them. to return and issues funding from start discussions Policy . nvriis Wet ad Ronca and (Weerts universities
1999 fcos Dye 2010; (Doyle factors n the general for member goals states. s a s ).
There is a proposed link at the supranational level among level supranational the at link proposed a is There nd education (Gibb et al. 2013). al. et (Gibb education nd
.
et al. 2009), tax support for higher e higher for support tax 2009), al. et
most important most el fet Dlny n Doyle and (Delaney effect heel t the at comprehensive summary of research on determiners of of determiners on research of summary comprehensive aial, the Basically,
(HEP) ducation state
7 the
ean o be to remain relations have been strongly shaped by the the by shaped strongly been have relations s of inter of s
ee. Nevertheless, level. power
P
dimensions eilto of legislation olicy
Rizzo .
country relations The - governmental policies such as the as such policies governmental -
making
06, n sae iaca aid financial state and 2006),
2007). Based on a somewhat somewhat a on Based 2007). uoen Union European etrd o udn, access, funding, to centered
- because ee lgsain f higher of legislation level
important n f stakeholders of In sum, higher education higher sum, In
c
ontemporary European European ontemporary urntoa interests supranational 2007), differences in in differences 2007),
ducation (Archibald ducation it connects all area all connects it shift shift a become has the , occurred
key s
CEU eTD Collection policies has education higher scheme fees tuition introduce to priv of determiner main with by influenced policy by introduced measures the to specific related also are they and actors the of making decision of mechanisms internal the situation attributes of function was and theory, choice 333). of patterns and service; constrai and norms, negative behavior, public and government of structures and the organizations situations; formal repetitive in actors by used concepts shared organization; an of strategies features institutional trigger behavior of outcome shared a is policy institutionalism, funding of context the in choice rational institutional education charac funding state distinction, different ate. As ate. (
Ostrom 2007 Ostrom Access I (2013) Tandberg and Ness
sgiiat hne i acs usually access in changes significant , trigger nstitutional rational choice is a product of merging new institutionalism with rational with institutionalism new merging of product a is choice rational nstitutional . These attributes reflect the values, beliefs, information beliefs, values, the reflect attributes These .
it is the case in Hungary, t Hungary, in case the is it
party affiliation of policy makers makers policy of affiliation party
is movements. student teristics (Nessteristics andTandberg
another important another
quoted higher education policy in contexts where publi where contexts in policy education higher
become a critical issue for gover for issue critical a become ( 333 f policy of
developed ). or
in Ness and Tandberg Tandberg and Ness in
Institutions o nrae t increase to - makers
mhsz te motne f new of importance the emphasize y Ostrom by field also he nts” (Os nts” ,
include thesis Increasing . s el s fnto of function a as well as e mut f tu of amount he depends on demographics, economy, and higher higher and economy, demographics, on depends - aes Fr ntne sc me such instance, For makers.
2013 8
trom will show that in such in that show will
.
generate or by or the h core The 2013, 333) 2013, ,
329
2007 “
nments and similarly to funding to similarly and nments formal and informal rules, norms, and and norms, rules, informal and formal or decreasing the number of number the decreasing or the the ).
-
eae aog students. among debates quoted related policies. In terms of new new of terms In policies. related formal formal
to wti a existing an within ition da s ht oiy ucm i a is outcome policy that is idea . In sum, funding see funding sum, In .
in Ness and Tandberg and Ness in powers their office operates operates office their powers - ed
gathering capabilities, and capabilities, gathering trbts f h decision the of attributes
c funding prevails over over prevails funding c y ainl hie and choice rational by system, policy attempts attempts policy system,
ntttoaim and institutionalism asures can be be can asures m
s to be the the be to s t il be will It people in in people financial - related
2013 ,
CEU eTD Collection http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/t9300080.htm/t9300080.htm 4 3 (Stensaker 2007). systems assurance quality academic the of improvement and mainte the Qualityincludes levels.different atpractice into put be can assurance quality c these of interpretations overlapping c most the of some importance inthe developmentofHungarian education I r were unions 2013 self professional funding, autonomy institutional over guardian influence corporate with them connects institutions autonomy decreasing p thenumber of education higher complete people more and more have and t that shown
nstitu “Az OFÉSZ Krón“Az OFÉSZ 1993 Act of LXXX h Act of on 1993 , 7 inl uooy rm uh nlec ws lo rvdd by provided also was influence such from autonomy tional h ls dmnin icse is discussed dimension last The to Similarly ).
In after the Hungary, 4 Gvn the Given . atr because matters has changed has he general tendency at the supranational policy level is to keep increasing access increasing keep to is level policy supranational the at tendency general he eformed ikája.” Accessed April 23, April Accessed ikája.”
ontrovers funding and funding
igher hud e rne t institutions to granted be should
h sae n wt te oit. n short, In society. the with and state the
o ht t that so
centralized education. Accessed A Accessed education. and -
oenne ad cdmc reo t univers to freedom academic and governance, of the institutions the of articipants
ial part of HEP of part ial today these institutions these today
the reg
access, e unions he ime change in1989/1990 ime change
relationship between government and and government between relationship achievements of students (Dill students of achievements
2014. legacy of the communist communist the of legacy , t ,
was the one of oncepts his
the degree to which government gr government which to degree the http://www.hallgatoimozgalom.hu/posts/2 quality
pril 23, 2014. pril 2014. 23, shift
would , higher education policy higher
fields Acrig o Stensaker to According . 9 and the quality assurance schemes of the state the of schemes assurance quality the and
is assisted by policy instruments instruments policy by assisted is of of
because there are there because not
dcto. ult assurance Quality education.
first operate based on a 'social compact' that compact' 'social a on based operate . s h sae a become has state the As be
objectives2011 of the . In . ,
influence organizational of patterns
case of the of case autonomy from political and and political from autonomy era
2007), the diverse range of of range diverse the 2007), ,
(Baráth and (Baráth the the d hs cags a key had changes these various definitions and and definitions various
by (2007), the means of means the (2007), 93 c o higher on Act 1993
Hunga - te (Enders ities az oiia part political ihr education higher - ants institutional ants ofesz
policies
rian reforms, rian Cseh 2007). that provide that -
kronikaja. c oe f a of more onstitutes onstitutes
student student
. nance t al. et ies
3 .
CEU eTD Collection betweeneconomic and individua d the to education higher Hungarian of framework current policy education higher of dimensions multiple the of challenges the relation. supranational making patterns of context larger the to or reforms Hungarian the to specifically dynamics making which policy education higher of aspects the on debates the to as well as education, higher in globalization of challenges the on debates scholarly of opportunities affects each of interests differing and shared the given meaningfully which to extent (“Széll Kálmán Plan” wh education w what scheme, management debt a of part were reforms knowledge technical and professional more with students equip and degrees ich
major is competitiveand is major it has it h case The What In iscussion, some of the policy solutions solutions policy the of some iscussion,
Hungary, was given to another one. one. another to given was
to meaningfully function. meaningfully to ean calnig bu te iesos f ihr dcto policy education higher of dimensions the about challenging remains .
will will urntoa, state supranational, an important claim important an 2011). Furthermore, it will add specific policy specific add will it Furthermore, elc o te state the on reflect students
wh l interests inhigher education .
o ti rao, h Hungarian the reason, this For ich is not, and it determinedand it not, is ich o eape state example, For -
It can als can It ee, n institutional and level, of the reforms the of 10 – shed light on challenges on light shed
nttto relation institution o be the basis of further research on policy on research further of basis the be o . Although the policy problems are not new not are problems policy the Although . along with the with along was to increase the competitiveness of competitiveness the increase to was as taken from one subfield of higher of subfield one from taken as and a gained
. player
recommendations
funding based on that decisionthat on based funding - ee policies level
multiple dimensions within dimensions multiple case , large
and how this interaction this how and n o te national the on and
that affect the relation the affect that il otiue o the to contribute will
r role in influencing influencing in role r and and . However, as However, to a function can
to cope with cope to dac the advance
policy s the is the – - -
CEU eTD Collection trade a of basis a as serve not do and state the to linked not are these however, education, of learning” about understandings shared of student In students. of opportunities to contrasted direction This environment implementation policy in directions the case to Hungariancase ofthe inlight of publication the from fo articles the of Some 2011 the (Andor changes about upcoming media the reached news first the when written articles and studies preliminary to ch the of aspects Some th that strategy a with dimensions policy relevant the of framework is thesis the of goal The dimensions ese h dph of depth the
T w But The of study c here have b have here ontract its Centralits hy is the Hungarian case Hungarian the is hy by linking by
s in is C . maintaining
. HAPTER h academi the Also, criticism has not been refined as to what could be improved and how. and improved be could what to as refined been not has criticism Also,
ed n motn calne of challenge important an deed
connects een learning contracts between contracts learning een higher educationpolicy higher - European context anges have been studied but a comprehensive analysis can contribute can analysis comprehensive a but studied been have anges ue seiial on specifically cused
state funded funded state dcto at Education 3. o xli the explain to the studied case studied the
ult o euain te atr matn te economic the impacting latter the education; of quality all di all Europe 2020 ltrtr o te topic the on literature c M ETHODOLOGY a Polónyi ; mensions a mensions higher education higher
that relevant a ( Keczer 2012
Glance (Goodman and Beenen 2008 Beenen and (Goodman
respond to the challenges of today‟s globalized globalized today‟s of challenges the to respond S
, ugra plc reforms policy Hungarian (HEP) trategy 01 Cee 01 Knsi 2011 Kenesei 2011; Cseke 2011;
. 11 economic interest economic n stub one nd presents the events as they were they as events the presents nd
So far, literature has not approached the topic topic the approached not has literature far, So to study to
AND (Harsányi & Vincze 2012), 2012), Vincze & (Harsányi
provides for a for provides
institutions and students specifying “a set set “a specifying students and institutions (Ladányi 2012; Andor 2011 (Ladányi Andor 2012; ihr education higher ). -
R ? First, First, ? theme (HE) .
ESEARCH ot f the of Most
and labor market requirements market labor and uh as such some of its its of some is linked is
diverse range of approaches. rangediverse of D
where , 522 , ESIGN nlzn OC data OECD analyzing
studied ihn multi a within to state funding by funding state to elements )
massification to boost qu boost to
; Fejér 2011). 2011). Fejér ; analyzing the the analyzing b aspects were were aspects ), or shaped by by shaped represent
rela - level ality ting
is is a - .
CEU eTD Collection http://www.iom.int/cms/en/sites/iom/home/where 6 2014. “Eurydice and http://www.kormany.hu/hu/emberi 5 create managerialism, marketiz t related is which of point reference higher educationpolicy. c means. methodological in an create will globalization to Western countries or young people rateof represent contrac student the of form current the in (enro enrollment of issues legal other and financial outcome learning and curriculum loan Net the In enrollment. of conditions the sets document written market labor and education funded state between off
ontent of the reforms over time over reforms the of ontent “Kormányzat “Europe “Europe
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/eurypedia_en.php. schemes s
Furthermore, Tight‟s from Drawing reason, this For the building block building the -
s International Org
measures - -
Eurypedia Eurypedia . EmberiErőforráso
Accounting for Accounting require - depth contribution to higher education policy studies by combining different combining by studies policy education higher to contribution depth the the o 6
the structural multi structural the to . - iesfcto, nrpeeraim globalizati entrepreneurialism, diversification,
thesis Descriptions of National Education National of Descriptions
rmt opein f h studies the of completion prompt anization for Migration.” Accessed May for11, Migration.” Accessed anization
the reforms can reforms the growing m growing problems
The ation, and massification ( of the method the of - eroforrasok k Minisztériuma
is a is thesis not only looks at specific events and formulation of the the of formulation and events specific at looks only not thesis
the lack of possibility to conduct conduct to possibility of lack the (2003) approaches (2003)
national policy national
but also connects the dot the connects also but shared by shared igration - related requirements (learning contracts), as well as as well as contracts), (learning requirements related - miniszteriuma/hirek/a
- be we - ology level approach of HEP of Saarinen and Ursin Ursin and Saarinen of HEP of approach level - -
t is not used in Europe. Nevertheless, the contract the Nevertheless, Europe. in used not is t Hírek.” Accessed May 2014. Accessed 10, Hírek.” linked work/europa.h flows
European countries such as high unemployment high as such countries European 12 .
The authors The analysis
from economically less prosperous countries countries prosperous economicallyless from to the larger context of higher education higher of larger context the to 122 for researching system policy, system researching for Syste llment documents); the Hungarian solution solution Hungarian the documents); llment .
). In the United Kingdom and in France, a France, in and Kingdom United the In tml.
- ms and Policies EACEA.” Accessed May EACEA.”Accessed Policies 10, msand hallgatoi
of the 2011 Hungarian HEP reforms HEP Hungarian 2011 the of
5
2014. .
s with the multiple dimensions of dimensions multiple the with s
lhuh ouet eit o set to exist documents Although distinguish among actor, among distinguish - osztondij time herlands, -
series analysis series n internationalization, on, - szerzodes some of some - nem the the applied applied the - , the thesis the , roghoz recurring recurring agency, agency, (2012) - kotes
and and ,
CEU eTD Collection as the studied phenomenon power explanatory approach. agency the than costly it analysis, data of terms in Yet, inclusive. more is approach structural the approach, design descriptive a for basis understandabl understanding of highe the dynamics changes” societal to this of instit the state, the as such structures. analytic 145 int the combining data includes it as costly is approach and actors between interaction the of outcome the as change policy understands it as inclusive more is positions. their by mainly actorsjudge structures. on dependent are and in located ta model this change structural and policies - 153). . type Fur is it that is approach structural the selecting of reason The three the of Out
al A
ctors are interpreted as interpreted are ctors
thermore, s thermore, domains set within a structure. a within set domains It approach, which which approach,
are cons are of analysis. In case of case In analysis. of
kes the structural approach into consideration because it assumes that actors are are actors that assumes it because consideration into approach structural the kes focuses on the use of m of use the on focuses
e for for e approaches.
and tant subject tant a
ome might might ome ie uine Bsds i i srtgc patcl and practical strategic, is it Besides, audience. wide prtn wt patcl ol t fse knowledge foster to goals practical with operating taking
( Saarinenand Ursin approaches
utions, or utions, policy for force driving the as actors interprets approach actor The nepes oiy hne s h pout f well of product the as change policy interprets
issues
s hc ain wt te ae study case the with aligns which
individual or institutional institutional or individual of changes (Tight (Tight changes of argue that capturing that argue
the The The r education
t , students. Shared students. for granted for acro, meso, and meso, acro, reforms, the state is seen as “a stable structur stable “a as seen is state the reforms, As opposed to the actor approach, t actorapproach, the to opposed As structural e s he From a methodological point o point methodological a From
The weak point of point weak The tructural 2012, 145 2012, 13
( , which means that structures tend to explain to tend structures that means which , SaarinenUrsin and approach 2003, 24). However, via the means of a of means the via However, 24). 2003,
approach approach
'self micro levels or alternatively; on actors actors on alternatively; or levels micro eractions of actors and structures (2012,structures and actors eractionsof policy - 153 -
sustaining' structures are the basis the are structures sustaining' “change agents” “change ). also -
reforms
this is has
. h ms c most the approach is that it tends to tends it that is approach
As opposed to the actor actor the to opposed As 2012, 2012, limitation become f view however, view f he he 146) . agency approach approach agency To some degree, some To rvds proper provides s - ommonly used used ommonly analytical and and analytical s:
production on on production . outdated soon outdated
having - established established e reacting e is less is
little
the
CEU eTD Collection of language the to related themeso within appliedbe will approachTherefore, the reforms the of justification and construction the in role important an played values social the to central that policy the theories in forces shaping represent and ideologies representations, ideas, on based reform the of reorientations evolution an time across designs policy in variability enormous to leads that knowledge „local‟ of host a as well as pol „good‟ about ideas in trends national precedent, historical values, social and political decision c policy of forces analysis decision ( studies” policy educational policy ( them produce that realities the hand policy strong justification can be related en multi vironment in which s which in vironment , discursive analysis makes policy background visible as it it as visible background policy makes analysis discursive , - ee srcua approach structural level
is a is reality and reality Specifying A . - -
makers ( makers becomes it making,
discursive approach will will approach discursive “textual business and business “textual s motn bcue t defines it because important is
to d space” (Schneider and Sidney and (Schneider space” d analysis
the 2). Policy design design Policy 2).
the tipis too implies it hange as
larger larger
it discursive approach discursive f h 21 reforms. 2011 the of has troubleswithdefining uch policies take place at the state the at place take policies uch
such as specific reasons, theories and ideologies that informed informed that ideologies and theories reasons, specific as such context h gvrmna communication governmental the 2012, h pout f cos n structures and actors of product the
i i psil t maigul epoe h complex the explore meaningfully to possible is it , consequently, it is easy to accept the use of texts as data in data as texts of use the accept to easy is it consequently, arnn n Usn 2012, Ursin and Saarinen much textual data to analyze and synthesize and analyze to data textual much
and challenges challenges and also 152). is -
making defined as a “ a as defined be Also, as as Also, , Musselin and Teixeire (2014) focus on the on focus (2014) Teixeire and Musselin , applied
14 n h H the In (Musselin and Teixeire and (Musselin 2009, 105 2009,
otaitos psil r possible contradictions, of higher educationpolicy. the difference between policy constructand . On the one hand, the approach the hand, one the On . the policy has policy the choice of design elements [that] reflects [that] elements design of choice nain ae ielg, political ideology, case, ungarian - level analysis and will be specificallybe will and analysis level ).
level and by doing s doing by and level As a result, a As 153).
n h reforms the on
focuses on focuses to pass to Besides,
and
2014
understanding understanding
t provides it num , 7 ,
dfntos and edefinitions ihr education higher the
). erous levels of of levels erous . It will also be be also will It .
o; On the other the On texts Mostly
the results the requires
data for for data
driving driving and policy policy , ,
icy, and and
the on a .
CEU eTD Collection opinion her or his questionnaire elements measure they Also, topic. the about abroad) studying people with and in), enrolled is multiple low have access probability toparticipate. Internet without individuals that is method the of limitation a therefore subj additional generate used an questionnaire. the of on attitudes andconstructed opinions is system. on data gather to and reforms 2011 the on opinions with applied be will survey Furthermore, demonstrations. student previous on and people young of presence political the on focusing revisited, be will reforms HEP and reforms changedove used be also will analysis language d that they can stop filling out the questionnaire the out filling stop can they that d
i mas f oil media. social of means via loehr 1 responses 118 Altogether introduce text introductory An study to Finally,
Participants are active college and college active are Participants -
choice of the reforms the of f the of . Including it Including
question official official . Answers for Answers r time. The ects” (Gideon 2012, 11). 2012, (Gideon ects”
student perspectives at perspectives student s one answer one .
and governmental
with
Moreover, respondents is
to understand the policy evolution ie. how the content of the the of content the how ie. evolution policy the understand to
a of the HE system. HE the of useful for the for useful
questionnaire design questionnaire multiple answers (referring to what level of HE the respondent respondent the HE of level what to answers(referring multiple this
are hs method This
(on (on
question s
respondents‟ respondents‟ cln questions scaling
analyzed the ar ln ad programs and plans the e
uni broader
informed that participation is voluntary, anonym anonym voluntary, is participation that informed in Hungarian research relation between student contract and number of number and contract student between relation 15 versity
are
. the micro level micro the
n online an Internet connection is needed for completion; for needed is connection Internet An optional An “relies on referrals from initial subjects to to subjects initial from referrals on “relies any c Mainly coded project, the specific topic, and the purpose the and topic, specific the project, aifcin n areet ih different with agreement and satisfaction .
any because the respondent can elaborate on on elaborate can respondent the because It aims to reveal to aims It students rtcl reflections critical
mea time. time. using using based on what on based cross lose
sure . The . studied be will open d , Snowball sampling method is method sampling Snowball Google Form
-
the relation between students between relation the sect questions o ifre people informed how - questionnaire ended question ended ion type type ion
and and policy
on
interpret are . .
self the current HE HE current the h d The
used used measure
collects data data collects - completion completion closes the closes
students‟ iscursive iscursive uh as such
they feel feel
CEU eTD Collection along t with and levels the between created remain a there is and effective policy education higher of directions The translation English to, react
what what the recall, To
and all three level three all he applied approaches what what change change
RQ
s together together s of the questionnairecan found inthe appendix. be are s (
if indicated if based on the complex assessment of what each each what of assessment complex the on based
(1) ing
capture.
and the related sourcesand therelated
h oiy gap? policy w os h Hnain ae opy ih international with comply case Hungarian the does ow - making? ) , and implementation and ,
The macro, meso, and micro micro and meso, macro, The 16
and (2) and
hogot h aayi, omncto is communication analysis, the Throughout
a re the 2011 higher education re education higher 2011 the re
are they suggest they presented
in Table 1(below) in levels of the analysis the of levels
(where applicable). applicable). (where level
individually forms .
,
CEU eTD Collection Table 1.
Research 17
d esign
CEU eTD Collection t analysis case, selected the in but feasibility, of scope the beyond much' 'too capture ( reforms policy an of use the justifytopic the of nature therecentof limitations the time, same the At analysis. of time a creating for opportunity o thegeneral education policychallenges. higher
in - depth In sum, studying the 2011 reforms brings about some limitations such as the lack of of lack the as such limitations some about brings reforms 2011 the studying sum, In
tells 'the most' and can serve as the basis of basis the as serve can and most' 'the tells
multi usln and Musselin - level
analysis.
- Teixeire series analysis on the effects the on analysis series icrie set are aspects Discursive 2014). 18
It
migh further t be also
research, as well as a contribution a as well as research,
of the reforms at selected levels levels selected at reforms the of argue useful d
ht the that in
research
a comprehen a thesis ing
at to wants national national sive sive
CEU eTD Collection period. 7 run means recession global mobility social and employment, education, v of part be to considered not are and category practice more are that programs B' 'tertiary Higher degrees. issue that programs university and college and certificates, provide that programs legal setting because depth of edition latest policy education higher resear education higher (EU) Union European and Opportunities, European C 4.1
Education at a Glance is published by published at is a Glance the Education ocational programs. , it means it ,
C
h question ch analyse As education higher Basically, chapter This Global HAPTER
education Hun
lbl recession global
is arequirement gary gary
loss of loss o HE. on s P
Education at Education atter 4
(HE) is a member state. Therefore, harmonizing policies with policies harmonizing Therefore, state. member a is n whether on tde include studies .
M analy
skill,
n ACRO
policy context at the macro level macro the at context policy - n h cret atrs n pealn mcaim o contemporary of mechanisms prevailing and patterns current the on demoralization of the general attitude of attitude general the of demoralization s making. h E The
zes zes and de
, made made -
, motivation and motivation
which
s
a M tatistical data, policy reports, journals and journals reports, policy data, tatistical h Hnain ae complies case Hungarian the the uropean uropean
Glance 2013 Glance The global The ESO OECD Directorate for Education and andcovers Skills the 2008 for Education for OECD Directorate
y trir A program A' 'tertiary European Union includes post includes H ou was ompetitiveness UNGARIAN , th unemployment unemployment th
AND
a Union ctually - patterns
M oriented. Doctoral programs belong to a higher a to belong programs Doctoral oriented. growing pessimism abo pessimism growing 19 ean central remain 7 HE , which is one of the of one is which ,
I
CRO otx wi context
- debated incase ofthe secondary education along with along education secondary
C in the same sense as b as sense same the in
ASE are - LEVEL
C ta ae m are that s
limited limited
ontex
ky oiy su, t issue, policy key a to ll weigh more in the discussion discussion the in more weigh ll
contribute to contribute o the to ih nentoa drcin of directions international with E t NVIRONMENT OF to OECD to : Education, Economic: Education,
young people. On the long the On people. young
report ut the chances of finding of chances the ut r theory ore most comprehe most 2011 reforms.2011
ache . publications answer countries using the using countries
n h s the On the supranational the lor, master and and master lor, he relation of of relation he - oriented ing
vocational vocational THE nsive hort
the first the
- of the the of 2011 2011
- run,
and and in - - CEU eTD Collection Accessed 2011. Union, 8 of the programs (VET) Training and Education Vocational orien academically more general, than employability their for prospects better offers clearly education vocational concl report the fact, G 13 3, the to compared 1, the side both at unemployment in rise a is there Sadly, 2011. to 2008 from period the during lev high with people and groups) age all (across education of levels degree. tertiary a without those from people unemployed 4, which employment, from income 14). o people. young of underemployment the NEE the of 16% job. a
“Vocational Education and Training in Hungary.” andTrainingin Education “Vocational utcome of both economic context and of specific policies specific and of context botheconomic utcome of eneral or vocational programs both in sec in both programs vocational or eneral 8 % of people who had tertiary had who people of % 8 ).
25
T (people neither employed nor engaged in education or training). It was It training). or education in engaged nor employed neither (people T 5 % point increase for people with higher level of education attained rem attained education of level higher with people for increase point % 5 Regarding employment and participation in education, in participationand employmentRegarding 2011 reforms, aswell - Program orientation is orientationProgram the on Based 9 year 29
average proportion of people of proportion average - olds.
8 % point increase for peo for increase point % 8 9, May 2014. e upr eodr education secondary upper ted udes that “[f]or young people who do not continue into tertiaryeducation, intocontinue not do who youngpeople “[f]or that udes
aa euainl tanet had attainment educational data, hs tnece ae rud o e osqecs of consequences be to argued are tendencies These 8 .
http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/4103_en.pdf
a key issue in OECD countries countries OECD in keyissue a
impact impact degree were unemployed in 2011contrasted to a 12,6 % of % 12,6 a to 2011contrasted in unemployed were degree Additionally
CEDEFOP. was between 15 and 29 years belonged to the group of group the to belonged years 29 and 15 between ondary and in tertiary education are important are education tertiary in and ondary ple with lower level of educa of level lower with ple
20 strengthened
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the E Office of Luxembourg:Publications hg yuh unemployment youth high , ” have ( 201
n mat n employability on impact an
(“Education at (“Education The gap between people with low with people between gap The by the financial the by become central to central become 3 14 , i in n 2011 n
fight ). With els of education widened widened education of els , ing
across OECD countries,OECD across .
youth
a tion attained ( attained tion similar arguments, arguments, similar
crisis. O crisis. Glance” 2013, 13 Glance” 2013, the 20% unemployment. unemployment. ains moderate ains h cii on crisis the justification a be can n average, n uropean uropean in case of of case in and on on and 2013 s
. In . but the the - , CEU eTD Collection ( 10 the be to seems education secondary pr after employed getting directly of instead skills long the on opportunities an in results that earning yo where environment expected and employment education, between relationship getting anincreased over time. income and job a starting to contributes education low and educated highly of income the between difference average the 2011, by countries OECD Th 2011 reforms argument creation the pu completion programs VET from trainees get they as recruiting educational co a of consists that structure the to Due development. professional and market on based are that qualifications specific work provides it participants, 2013 evailing strategy. Regarding the period from 2000 to 2011, to 2000 from period the Regarding strategy. evailing signific a for requirement no is there thus, entities, blic e gap between highly educat highly between gap e % p % - educated p educated , 15 oint increase in the proportion of adults with tertiary educa tertiary with adults of proportion the in increase oint Clearly V Ideall ocational and university/college degrees university/college and ocational s ).
. For the government, VET programs are fruitful because the costs are shared with shared are costs the because fruitful are programs VET government, the For . were similar as above, tertiary education VET places were places VET education tertiary above, as similar were
Connected to theseConnected results, to services f kle work skilled of is VET y, , which will beon theexactreformswill showninthe chapter , which measures of , eople reached 90 % 90 reached eople lbl ednis support tendencies global and business partners; business and ung people are more motivated to create strategies in order to get better better get to order in strategies create to motivated more are people ung profitable - run. Turning to higher education and acquiring specific competitive specific acquiring and education higher to Turning run. - fo - place training place ed and low and ed c rmis upre ( supported remains rce
for
point participants, for bus for participants,
EU has similar goals increasEU has to similar s -
educated people has people educated the prospective employers do not have to spend on spend to have not do employers prospective the from it from
that helps students acquire the proper skills for for skills proper the acquire students helps that 21 s related is the existence of a closely interdependent interdependent closely a of existence the
- ed. oevr i cnrbts o personal to contributes it Moreover, needs. remain s former value of 75 of value former s
who
03 29 2013,
to
inesses, and for the government. government. the for and inesses, can continue working after working continue can important w important ant share of the public budget public the of share ant
security security Education at Education widen ). tion across OECD countries OECD across tion
In Hungary, although the the although Hungary, In rvdn the providing e hen it co it hen ed significantly. significantly. ed participation
ev % - entually
operation between operation a point Glance mes to income. to mes s .
Moreover, cut by the by cut chance of of chance
in HE. reports a a reports program . Across
while For
CEU eTD Collection 2010. by Area political the Education Besides, Higher European the creating of aim the with introduced was Commission European the the as but policy national of been ensuring make thatstudentscareer can informeddecisions. rates completing increasing participation, on: increasing focus should governments measures important most the constitute policies following we that decisions rather was changed what 2011 ( policy education in case of leav which wages, professionals situ existe the be can reason Another employer. when qualification and j between discrepancy the is lists report the explanation One do. to them expected stands. equilibrium pai d off in terms of social mobility. The high skills skills high The mobility. social of terms in off d ation of skilled young people young skilled of ation a shift of interest regarding higher education policy. Originally, HEP was only a matter matter a only was HEP Originally, policy. education higher regarding interest of shift a period, The European Union objectives are in line with line in are objectives Union European The of concept central the remains funding earlier, discussed been has it As simple: is reason The
the Hungarianreformsthe of thegovernmental asparts communication.
governments did not change the allocated budget for education r education for budget allocated the change not did governments but re made re many of of many HEP es a es Yet, Yet, initiative aimed to transform Europe so that it would become 'Europe of 'Europe become would it that so Europe transform to aimed initiative ) gap gap . high skills do not match the required high skills from the side of the of side the from skills high required the match not do skills high
In terms of funding, of terms In
the allocation of spending within education and the and education within spending of allocation the otrn te tanet f kls eurd y th by required skills of attainment the fostering hr ae epe hs poet di projects whose people are there those professionals migrate to other countries for more competitiv more for countries other to migrate professionals those (2013, 15) (2013,
behind , improving the quality of of quality the improving , tre to started concept
f r ot people most or
(2013, 15) (2013, that remains un remains that
of knowledge society gained p gained society knowledge of . According to the patterns revealed in this chapter, the chapter, this in revealed patterns the to According . e mr involved more get . c o cran oiis ht o o avne the advance not do that policies certain of nce Alternatively, there is a market need market a is there Alternatively, data 22
h attained who
re indicate two things. First, things. two indicate solved. education –
h lblted. n at t fact, In trends. global the I 19, h Bologna the 1999, In . high wage, low skills skills low wage, high
These arguments will be revisited revisited be will arguments These
tertia nt un u te a they way the out turn not d
in secondary education, and and education, secondary in y dcto, hs strategy this education, ry rominence over the world, the over rominence
during that during adically. Second, Second, adically.
jb market, job e kind of policy of kind - – Declaration Declaration for specific specific for
ob market ob o wage low here has has here higher 2008 e -
CEU eTD Collection area/building 9 Communication means citizenship, as understood base, knowledge a maintaining research stimulating and creating development, personal their enabling including Bologna harmonizati complete education, higher of regulation the over strengthened has concern supranational although that indicate facts These Bologna the and banks, of Euro, of Europe being besides knowledge'
“ Building which they to development, local and regional and researchers; of training particular in training, spin and cooperation industrial to these thanks results, its all of exploitation in part take and research of they fields three the in play they that role key the to due core, in their at processes, unique, are Universities services. or indust new processes through use its on and technologies, communication and information through dissemination its training, and education through transmission its knowledge, The otrn knowledge, fostering -
system was designed to create connection betweensystem tocreate connection designed was the European Hi European the rprn suet t b atv cit active be to students preparing The knowledge society depends for its growth on the production of new new of production the on growth its for depends society knowledge The - the
“full range o “fullrange - cnmc means economic system was voluntary for the states the for voluntary was system -
european can contributecan significantly (1 means to means
(2003)
- higher gher Education Area.” Accessed Area.”gher Accessed Education d noain “odn Communiqé” (“London innovation nd document document f purposes” ofhigher fpurposes”
carry out policy object policy out carry - education
fostering noain n development. and innovation sums up sums - area.aspx
rain f h of creation
the re .
on of HE systems is not required. Instead, the the Instead, required. not is systems HE of on ). education was education 23
izens, preparing students for future careers, careers, future for students preparing izens,
ives: May fined strategicfined goals
allowing for allowing 4, 4, democratic means democratic 2014. 2014. igh of econom of -
also centered to the EU ( EU the to centered also kle hmn aia, and capital, human skilled http://www.eua.be/eua these systems these
flexibility The 2007). y (Zgaga y
:
uoen Commission European - off; Accordingly, fostering democratic fostering 9
. n implementation in 2009, 176). 2009,
education and and education - work - and Zgaga - policy Joining
E is HE rial rial social
2009) 2009) and - .
CEU eTD Collection http://ec.eur 11 http://cordis.europa.eu/programme/rcn/843_en.html. 10 achieve theconstitute followinglist: by 2020 inclusion, social innovation, course, employment, of and climate/energy are which objectives main five created has Skills New for Agenda Area Globalization the for Policy initiatives: two are there growth, sustainable initiatives: inclusive economy called is Council” and cohesion” social greater and jobs better and more with growth economic sustainable of capable of
“European C “European “Europe 2020 2020 “Europe becoming becoming
o ae uoen h European make to education: climate/energy:even1990, 20% gasor 20% than emissions 30% greenhouse lower in social inclusi innova employment: 75%of 20 The on, Later 34 of energyrenewables, from 20% obtained inenergyefficiency increase exclusion Europe 2020 Europe opa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. 2000 - year
iia aed fr Europe for agenda Digital Lisbon Strategy Lisbon ommission. COR ommission. – “ tion: researchtion: development: and
; “EC Europe‟s Growth Strateg Europe‟sGrowth - h ms c most the olds completing third level third olds completing education
in Lisbon, the Lisbon, in
reducing t
(“EC Communication”2011) (“EC
on: at least 20 million feweron: atleastmillion 20 orat social people and riskofpoverty in Communication” 2003
11
and Jobs and and it and DIS Programmes.” Accessed May 5, Accessed DIS Programmes.” meiie n dnmc knowledge dynamic and ompetitive ge euain ytm a system education igher 10 he of rates below early school 10%,of leaving at30 least 40%
has
focuses on three on focuses dcto. h tres eae t te betvs r amd to aimed are objectives the to related targets The education. European - 64 year64
and remained . Und . y -
European Commission.” AccessedMay Commission.” 4, European European Platf European , er inclusive growth, there are also two initiatives: initiatives: two also are there growth, inclusive er - olds noain Union Innovation
Commission
) central to EC objectives EC to central .
24 should 3% of the EU'sin it 3% of be the to invested GDP eore fiin Europe Efficient Resource
priori
. Under
be employed ties: creation of a smart, sustaining, and sustaining, smart, a of creation ties: orm
2014. 2014. „world (EC) smart growth, there are three flagship are there threeflagship smart growth, Against Poverty Against and ,
set t set - reference‟ - based economy in the world, world, the in economy based he ambitious long ambitious he ot o te Move the on Youth
.
The most The
2014. 2014.
and , ( Lso European “Lisbon . The Commission Commission The .
recent strategy recent An Industrial Industrial An - term goal goal term . Under Under .
- An CEU eTD Collection quality cause might education of directions new such however, market, labor the education higher into enter people more let will o forces maintaining the as seen are funding education higher in participation between connection of globalization and internationalization decrease d to means as HE on relying strategies, management debt with education connected making well as education, on focus responses order in responses policy of range wide a offers Poverty Against Platform European of Initiative the Finally, context. EC importanceacquiring of on relies Skills New for Agenda An ideas. innovative of application on and knowledge sust to center are Area Globalization youngemployment people. of ResourceIndustrial rate EfficientEurope,Policy An and for the include Move the on Youth the on more and research focuses of Union development Innovation projects. best the for funds granting by Europe over all institutions HE between networks of creation the and programs learning distance have
introduces the introduces e role key n sum In The All - related policies related ebt and to stabilize theeconomy ebt andtostabilize
of these objectives are inter of these are objectives
initiative also wants to strengthen the strengthen to wants also initiative s te lbl n spaainl context supranational and global the ,
n civn te. F them. achieving in term
.
dcto and education the right skills for rightskills „ the „flexicurity‟ Technological aspects of education have also gained importance and and importance gained also have education of aspects Technological
to fight poverty and decrease social exclusion, and some of these these of some and exclusion, social decrease and poverty fight to s
mobility n the on
remains f future education. future f , . As will be seen in the next chapter, Hungarian policy Hungarian chapter, next the in seen be will As . by - r xml, h Digit the example, or - related and related noaie ideas innovative related policy initiatives initiatives policy related
higher education higher ainability, however, they also rest on advanced advanced on rest also they however, ainability, merging
an important policy goal policy important an cnmc opp economic .
jobs of todayjobs of and tom
25
and to and
quality of jobs and working conditions. working and jobs of quality flexibility and security in the labor market labor the in security and flexibility both Solving public public
reveal s become more competitive players competitive more become
otiuig to contributing at th at ortunities al Agenda Agenda al e macro level. There is a strong strong a is There level. macro e education
distance and access problems problems access and distance
orrow ih h aim the with h prevailing the
. regarding both access and and access both regarding Therefore ‟ .
and f or nweg society. knowledge
uoe supports Europe higher education higher of raising raising of , increasing increasing , impacts
issues The
the the the
of of of - .
CEU eTD Collection CNRS. N connaissance. institutionn 12 N the universities”, disciplinary multi in research and Humboldt of development (Rappai implementation f ideas the Sometimes, education preferences ofacademia. the overruled interest public the aspects, many in because reforms 2011 the to linked be can (Le 2 Metso prefer” and Feuvre would profession the that those necessarily not are that profession academic the on decisions impose to used is interest‟ „public the of rhetoric the […] but institutions, th of legitimacy the recognizes state “the (bottom (top regulation of mode 4.2 same time how see to interesting integration cultural supporting by society Besides
As Le Feuvre and Metso (2005, 6 Metso LeFeuvreAs and
4.2.1
Since the regime change in 1989/1990 in change regime the Since education higher European Contemporary
- Higher Educationof PolicyContext Higher Hungary: Past andP economic con economic up). Hungary is categorized as a country with „concerted regulation‟ „concerted with country a as categorized is Hungary up). el et argumentation: le cas du argumentation: du el et le cas
ian (HE) in ouvelles approches cognitives, ouvelles
contrast the macro with model promo model The
was seen as a policy field subject to subject field policy a as seen was HE
Legal F : the Humboldt the : 005,
siderations, knowledge and innovation are expected to contribute to the to contribute to expected are innovation and knowledge siderations, Hungary‟s
-
2005, 515). 2005,
down), concerted regulation, and de and regulation, concerted down), r eeomn wre i theory in worked development or 6). This way of defining higher education higher defining of way This 6). ramework of ramework of tes “‟pure knowledge production knowledge “‟pure tes ) explain, t )explain,
développement du département SHS au CNRS." in Sociologie et in CNRS." départementdu au SHS développement higher education policy education higher ian
- he term comes from Catherine Paradeise. (1998). "Pilotage (1998). Paradeise. hetermCatherine from comes Traditionally, there were three were there Traditionally, edited by Anni Borzeix, A Bouvier, an Borzeix,A Bouvier, edited by Anni level tendenciesandlevel , the Napoleonic and t and Napoleonic the ,
and competitiveness and Hung e ac e 26 , regardless of the different governm different the of regardless , ademic profession and of the higher education higher the of and profession ademic arian Higherarian E
ytm fo systems constant ploi mdl rmts “multiple promotes model apoleonic
European Union
can align with and with align can he Anglo he modernization and development. development. and modernization
- . Moving to the meso level, it is it level, meso the to Moving .
and the integration of teaching teaching of integration the and lw he mdl: centralized models: three llow centralized mode of regulation of mode centralized u rsle i unsu in resulted but ducation ducation d P Pharo. Paris: Editions du Pharo.Editions P Paris: d different directions in the the in directions different
governance in Hungary Hungary in governance - American models. American
resent
policy objectives 12 , meaning that meaning , can b can
ents, higher higher ents, ccessful e
at th at
The .
e CEU eTD Collection education. higher2005 on CXXXIX of 13 country. the in HEIs post in participation increase to initiative The s To education. higher of goals the set and freedom, academic restored autonomy, their and (HEIs) institutions education (Setén system education education today‟s of by first w the to adjusted and from prevailed approach) French and approach) Humboldtian the on (relying German the Metso and Feuvre research and “education promotes Anglo model American the while centres”, research public autonomous and institutions education higher ystemacademic of degree levelsapplied. was
The est via fostering science and technological development technological and science fostering via est
strong centralization and dictation and strong centralization “ oe students more act was in force between 1 September 1993 and 28, February 2006, because it was repealedwas it by February Act and28, because the 1 1993 September 2006, between force in act was the thoroughly designed politics of developing knowledge and scienc and knowledge developing of politics designed thoroughly Moreover, basis the create to were introduced reforms important of set a change, regime Afterthe regime communist the of era the During international academia international and
13 ihr dcto model education higher HE . With various me various With . shaped
ytm The system.
„normative funding‟ was i was funding‟ „normative 2005, 8 2005, interests of the of interests were
universities The yi
- cetd te more the accepted,
amount of funding was divided on the basis of majors of basis the on divided was funding of amount 11). 1994). To set the scene for a new new a for scene the set To 1994).
asures, it contributed to the integra the to contributed it asures, is legal first
move towards move The . Instead, it Instead, .
(Ministr
regime. European h European s
(Polónyi 2009 (2005)
- y ofEducation2002) ietn ws the was milestone secondary education secondary
In short, short, In was subject to subject was
. ntroduced linking ntroduced 27 int
udn an funding In case of Hungary, the German influence influence German the Hungary, of case In igher education system was was system education igher
ernational competitiveness, the Anglo the competitiveness, ernational
(1949 , 96
that is responsive to „market n „market to responsive is that the ). -
1989)
r (Glatz 2002) (Glatz egime wanted egime
nttto received institution the the c LX o 1993 of LXXX Act
. system te country the ,
and soviet academia, governed by by governed academia, soviet
funding of HEIs of funding tion of the fragmented fragmented the of tion
(relying on the Napoleonic Napoleonic the on (relying
to increase the number of of number the increase to ,
. To reach this aim, this reachTo . the the e to catch up with up catch to ” Act mainly was implemented was became
defined higher higher defined Ti was This . to
eeds‟” (Le eeds‟” n higher on shaped by by shaped
instead of instead the state. state. the
isolated - higher Saxon
the the an -
CEU eTD Collection http://www.felvi.hu/diploman_tul/munkaadoknak/szol 15 http://www.ofi.hu/tudastar/erettsegi. 14 practical objectives m the created followed. advanced and intermediate subject: each mos and schools high in studies flexible more objectives as set are education quality transmits to able be should and membership EU the education. reacted job self a from one and in rate problem market fees tuition requiring offered. program major of type same the for funding institutions
“Oktatáskutató és Fejlesztő Intézet: Kétszintű Éret FejlesztőIntézet: Kétszintű “Oktatáskutatóés “Diplomán Túl: “Diplomán blt programs obility market (Rappai - these
The next important step was the was step important next The retd approach. oriented o h cutys ceso t te E the to accession country‟s the to H s:
knowledge The
It points out that Hungary has Hungary that out points It so European Higher Educati Higher European
EIs did not want to lose to want not did EIs programs. Consequently, comparing a degree acquired degree a comparing Consequently, programs.
final examination system examination final
that newly formed and traditional institutions recei traditionalthat newly institutions and formed A Bolognai R A Bolognai ois of motifs
15 2005 n ipoig rprto fr h jb akt ee oe f h main the of some were market job the for preparation improving and -
. financing .
,
eie, qa acs, cdmc freedom, academic access, equal Besides, hc gatd tts noe from income states granted which , 515 ,
endszer és Az Új Szakok.” Accessed April 7, April Szakok.”endszer Az Új Accessed és the
The
).
fram
status t vocational second vocational t is scesu intr successful first ework
on Area on self made a difference in quality when students when quality in difference a made .
To is introduced by the 2005 reforms, 2005 the by introduced is - 2005 tségi.” 2014. Accessed April 7,2014. April Accessed tségi.” 2014.
financing financing 14 are
to adjust to the changing conditions brought about brought conditions changing the to adjust to galtatas_cikk_bolognai. specifically provide a higher education higher a provide .
uropean Finally, 28 with an inter an with described Act
of students, thus, there was a small drop small a was there thus, students, ary schools with schools ary oduction CXXXIX CXXXIX h a the
U reform access, a new new a access, reform More
nion earlier - piain of pplication governmental reform. governmental ihr education higher
2014. rm h prpcie f h of perspective the from emphasis was put on programs on put was emphasis
f tuition of on higher e higher on u t but ved the same amount of state state amount of same ved the
with acad e an on i that is point main he
two available levels for for levels available two system that creates and and creates that system
a state a h Bologna the mc mobility, emic eutd in resulted ducation closing standardized and and standardized
n iiitd a initiated and - funded
Introducing entered the the entered
secondary . The . - quality system status igher igher
- and and Act out it
CEU eTD Collection 2011 in p census, started to 2012 and 2011 Conversely, included are elderly the tendencies. supranational (“ cohort age less inc number the while 30, short, of age the below active economically Inare people significantly. changed cohorts age among activity economic of proportion r and concentration population in strengthened data, emains Table 2. Oktatási Adatok Higher E 4.2.2
ouain dec population R The Th . At the same time, time, same the At .
in
esults eople attaining eople Population change in Hungary based onage cohorts 2001in and in 2012 decr e most recent national population census was conducted in 2011. According to the to According 2011. in conducted was census population national recent most e
the capital city of Budapest. Budapest. of city capital the 25 20 15 60 55 50 n mlile b 25 n h cs o te g chr o 5 ya ol year 55 of cohort age the of case the in 2,5 by multiplied and population age cohorts of the of cohorts age ducation ease during the last few years. thelast fewease during ------Demographics:
. T . 64 59 54 29 24 19 are he only exception only he
”
2013, 8 2013, more esd by reased
S
change in Table 2 Table in 8 ystem
T optimistic years of primary of years - he three age age three he the 19). Source: Source:
olde h Sca ad cnmc F Economic and Social The number of people completing final examination at the end of of end the at examination final completing people of number
f h yug n odr eeain lgs ih ot f the of most with aligns generation older and young the of 261000 people from 2001 to 2011. 2011. to 2001 from people 261000 . s are s There has been a decrease in all age cohorts of the young the of cohorts age all in decrease a been has There r generation r
Központi StatisztikaiHivatal bu euainl attainment educational about cohorts of young people and the three age cohorts of of cohorts age three the and people young of cohorts people between the age of 50 and 54, and 50 of age the between people T here are more economically active people, people, active economically more are here 520,8 613,8 713,9 790,8 769 645,3 education ma education
2001
29 in ,5
show a constant increase constant a show
employment
de . 2013
up less than 5% of the population the of 5% than less up . The highest economic highest The . ramework of of ramework .
. codn t te 2011 the to According Regional differences differences Regional
in number in reas 623,9 747,9 654,3 660,6 616,7 544,5 2012 the as their number their as ed in the 30 the in ed
(in thousand)
s r older or ds Hungarian
between yet, activity - the the 44 44
.
CEU eTD Collection 2012 (StatisztikaiOktatási Adatok, studies Tükör: their never continue and anyattainment 17 covers for programs give tertiary that tertiary reason, education 16 attainment theconstitute orlower people. secondamong unemployed biggestgroup ma education tertiary rat the unemployment, of terms In education. education tertiary 1) Figure (see differ to tend results employment, on i education and reforms problematic of 13,5 % ( leavers while itwas 11%in2001 attain people of number studies secondary their n this ordern this of importance
In the Hungarian case, post case, In Hungarian the Early school leavers Earlycover 18 school , When comparing the distribution of people comparingWhen with differe the distribution d Educational 17
. The most popular majors were engineering were majors popular most The . Hungarian results are relat are results Hungarian “
Oktatási Adatok because they give the basis of higher education higher of basis the give they because to th e effect of demographic changes, changes, demographic of effect e attainment attainment
ata e p 0 o uepoe pol and people unemployed of 10% up ke - rose and exceeded and rose secondary education covers tertiary education and vocational higher education, forthis higher andvocational education, secondarycovers tertiaryeducation education
ing tertiary level education level tertiary ing from academic year 2012 year academic from -
24 (“2011. évi 2013 Népszámlálás” (1
year old people who leave the education with a low level of attainment or without attainment without or a low levelwith of yearleave education who people the old ” -
3, 2013). 2013 n n mlyd tts hn epe ih rmr sho level school primary with people than status employed an in , 2 ively good with 11,25% compared to compared 11,25% with good ively ).
There are less peopleThere i are less
50% of the adult population. More importantly, the importantly, More population. adult the of 50% 30 o s 10 is io
- - level degree. 2013 shows that in the case of early school earlyschool of case the in that shows 2013 16
made . there were 17% less people in higher higher in people less 17% were there , economics, , % There are twice as many people with people many as twice are There
, 15 o 0, enn ta pol with people that meaning 30%, to
up 17% of the population i population the of 17% up
- (HE) n seconda nt educational attainment nt educational attainment 18) people with primary school school primary with people . . In 2012, due 2012, In .
and l and - 2013, 2) 2013, ry education ry iberal a European averageEuropean
a rts programs programs rts
to the 2011 2011 the to
,
which is n 2011 n based based CEU eTD Collection
2014. 18 expenditure education started onhigher todecrease. st 2 Figure attainment 61%. important also is education Vocational 70%. around rate employment an grant studies university and college Both attainment. education tertiary with compared
able “ Foglalkoztatási Ráta Befejezett Legmagasabb Iskolai Végzettség és Ne Iskolaiés Végzettség Legmagasabb Foglalkoztatási Befejezett Ráta “ Figure Figure http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xtabla/munkerohelyz/tablmh11_08.html.
ae ae uh oe for lower much are Rates ewe 20 ad 2011 and 2005 between There are two more important factors important more two are There Employment Educational Educational attainment end employment (see below) (see 1. 25
to (19,9%)
Distribution of basedpeople on educa
educational attainment educational in in Hungaryin 12 63 18
rates
. shows that in nominal terms, public terms, nominal in that shows
Source: KSH, Statisztikai Source: Tükör: Oktatási2012/2013 Adatok
reflect the reflect 2011 (%)
Sne h ya o te nrdcin f h reforms, the of introduction the of year the Since . educaiton tertiary education secondary lowerlevel school or primary ih school high positive positive levels. unemployed status
T : effect 31
e ihs epomn aeblnst people to belongs rate employment highest he tanet (39,9%) attainment
participation Educational Educational attainment
tional attainment termsin of employed and s
60 of higher education higher of 10
in in Hungary in 2011 (%)
mek Sz mek expenditure increased or remained or increased expenditure
ih n e an with in 30 HE erint, 2011.” Accessed April 29, April Accessed 2011.” erint,
and government sp government and and and unemployment
mployment rate around around rate mployment for for
if the actual rates are rates actual the if educaiton tertiary education secondary lowerlevel school or primary oe educational lower nominal ending
. CEU eTD Collection 2014. 29, April Accessed 19 the number onstate of admitted students introduced made criticism other radical a was there Then, again. rise to started 2008 languagelearning on focus p state ge applying, students of number decreasing diff three be can trajectories. same the along move places funded state to admitted students of number the to According on based rogram “ Esélyegyenlőség - . funded places. funded h scn pro cn e salse bten 08 n 21, hn h number the when 2011, and 2008 between established be can period second The Finally ‟
data from data Figure a anucd hc cvrd yas of years 5 covered which announced was o give to 200000 250000 100000 150000 dt on data , 50000
a Nyelvi Előkészítő Évfolyamokon.” Előkészítő a Nyelvi
2. rn period erent results
0 Government expenditure onhigher education in million HUF (2005 oe pc fr tdns prahn state approaching students for space more http:// The lowest point of that period that of point lowest The the
their 159921 2005
; off h dmn fr ihr education higher for demand the www.ofi.hu/tudastar/fehervari the number of applicants, the number of admitted s admitted of number the applicants, of number the w 19 icial website of the Hungarian application s application Hungarian the of website icial ay .
Thus, aro Thus, s 172003
2006 after the initial introduction of the 2011 reforms 2011 the of introduction initial the after itnuse. One, distinguished. Source: Source: 184244 2007 und 10.000 und - funded plac Felsőoktatási Ténytár, tting admitted, an admitted, tting 184244 2008
32 Fehérvári,Anikó.
drop - aniko. 191120 more
2009 roughly is es little. started a toincrease
after 2011 after
ih school high due to the fact that in 2004, „zero year „zero 2004, in that fact the to due students 185620
2010
2 follows Oktatáskutató és Fejlesztő Intézet és Fejlesztő Oktatáskutató d within that: within d 014 between - . udd places. funded
.
graduate As 2011 189283 . studies with an extensive extensive an with studies
iue 3 Figure
student movements and movements student 02 n 2008 and 2002 157536 ystem 2012 d
getting admitted to admitted getting
in 2009 instead ofinstead 2009 in tudents, and the and tudents,
called , changes were changes , se below) (see 123550 Consequently
2013 - 2013) felvi.hu
, 2009. , 2009. with a a with There
is is s , .
CEU eTD Collection concern valid a indeed has education higher to state The well. as Hungary, in related been slowly market. labor the on knowledge in second the is education education school people Hungary in market detailed more global and European trends, a In increasing. is older ge the while decreasing is population younger Figure Figure 3. nerational
state
The results show that educational attainment and economic opportunities are closely closely are opportunities economic and attainment educational that show results The In h opee secondary completed s erae. utemr, mlyet ae a rate employment Furthermore, decreased. as
Com conclusion as it is it as 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 - funded places in Hungary 20000 40000 60000 80000 - decreasing the2011 and breakdown, thereare breakdown, paring the number applicants,of admitted applicants, and applicants admitted to 0 the highest among people with university and college attainment. Vocationaattainment. college universityand with people among highest the . Based on educational attainment, attainment, educational on Based , 2001 Hungarian demographics align demographics Hungarian 2002
line, accounting for accounting line, 2003 higher education
education. 2004 C
basic idea of the reforms, to link economic interests of the of interests economic link to reforms, the of idea basic ontrary to these tendencies, g tendencies, these to ontrary 2005 difference po
2006 during Source: licies also lefttheir
2007 h nme o peop of number The
2008 Felvi.hu the standardthe application period s
33 degree with 2009
the importance of professional and professional of importance the
, 2010 in the degree of these changes these ofdegree the in
2014. s have ga s have
both within the supranational and within within and supranational the within both
with EU tendencies EU with 2011 most 2012 l so supports the key role of of role key the supports so
mark onthenumbers
2013 unemployed ined overnment funding on HE has has HE on funding overnment e tann ol elementary only attaining le
key importance places state for applicants admitted Numberof applicants admitted ofTotal number applicants ofTotal number
in t in and most employed most and - funded (2001 he
sense that the the that sense . .
-
2013) Similarly to to Similarly in the labor in the labor
practical practical
higher higher l CEU eTD Collection 22 21 Keresztényd 20 governmentFidesz later was loan‟ „crisis The 2013). (Csáki crisis financial the by impacted severely was which economy, transition the joined important ofthe policies anddiscourse thatshaped events the co with competing forces political major the of representatives the remained Fidesz and MSZP 193 2010 the lost they and 2006 in term second their yearseight charge for Before 2011). policy Parliament the ele interests theinterests ofthe to ofstudents. state but also economic inter context national the
The full name of the parties are Fidesz parties the name of The full “Eu.kormany.hu.” Accessed April 29, April Accessed “Eu.kormany.hu.” forMagyar ( Párt MSZPstands Szocialista nsiderablechanceswinning. for ctions where the Fidesz the where ctions - 4.2.3 194).
change h le The political The
. conceptualized as a deliberate act to act deliberate a as conceptualized emokrata Néppárt (Christian Democratic People‟s Party).Democratic People‟s (Christian Néppárt emokrata
t a b cnldd ht ic te at sse bcm saiie aon 1998; around stabilized became system party the since that concluded be can It Besides E uropean s ay f the of gacy The PoliticalEnvironmentThe ests and higher education higher ests and
was the current current the n soon and ,
( the an
“
environment in environment Te usin s rather is question The . U Széll KálmánSzéll Plan
from 2002 to 2010 to 2002 from
nion I re nternational
vision tre iiitn signifi initiating started 2002 - KDNP 22 Fidesz .
Also, the second higher education higher second the Also,
- 2014. of the 1989 constitution 1989 the of – 00 eid f the of period 2010
Magyar Polgári Szövetség (Fidesz (Fidesz MagyarPolgári Szövetség 20
- KDNP Hungarian Socialist Party). Socialist Hungarian
conservative coalition won coalition conservative M http://eu.kormany.hu/a which t which onetary ”
because economic interests economic interests because .
2011, 13) The party‟s popularity started to decrease right after decreaseright to party‟s startedThe popularity
government he reforms were introduced introduced were reforms he 34 direct the country i country the direct F
o t blne uh eainhp between relationship such balance to how und (IMF) und
at changes. cant election .
previous -
te s the ,
magyar
and the creation of of creation the and
s against Fidesz (Beck et al. et (Beck Fidesz against s
loan was taken to reestablish the reestablish to taken was loan
- - 2011 eu
ocialist socialist Hungarian Hungarian -
with a two a with tagsag nto a nto n o the of One
act was accepted was act reforms are related not only to the to related notonly are
- tortenete. at, MSZP party, „ Civic Alliance) and and Alliance) Civic hole government starts with the 2010 the with starts . - ‟ a thirds In
by the following the by
new new ot important most
2004
(Fleck et al, al, et (Fleck majority in majority s , 21
since t since Hungary includes
a in was
2011, he
CEU eTD Collection followed Then 2011. until pattern stable very a followed CX of the reforms. won currently ineffect. The reforms Program Reform National Hungarian cha Hungarian the of website official government. the from retrieved were documents governmental were legislation
gs n state in nges 4.2.4.1 4.2.4 yearly third h primnay el parliamentary the XXIX, The first period starts in the year of the elections when the Fidesz the when elections the of year the in starts period first The The in the form of the in the form
In by
decision on decision
eid oes h mod the covers period 2010 another decrease in tde pro i dvdd no he parts. three into divided is period studied t wa it h frt eid nlds h initia the includes period first The Preparations and Plans (December 2010 Plans (December and Preparations The
retrieved from retrieved - when udd lcs and places funded te oenets epniiiy o eie n hs nmes Te quota The numbers. these on decide to responsibility government‟s the s
Policy E
quota for state for quota the the ections 2011 Act CCIV of new government set up, th up, set government new volution volution
Magyar Közlöny, Magyar 2012 ih 23 majority 2/3 a with fctos te xlntos o te, n te outcome the and them, for explanations the ifications,
of the Higher Education 2011Act CCIV of on - providing funded places funded the . The second period includes the introduction of the the of introduction the includes period second The
nrdcin f the of introduction
and the 35 places11363 less. ,
numbers were cut by 2550 places 2550 by cut were numbers l the official Hungarian gazette. gazette. Hungarian official the
tp ta l that steps
intr (see Table 3 Table (see - e only higher education related act was was act related education higher only e
April2011) n luce is rjc of project its launched and oduction of the Data
d o h reforms: the to ed zl Klá Plan Kálmán Széll n stat on
below Széll Kálmán Plan2.0 Kálmán Széll ) e . - - udd lcs and places funded KDNP government government KDNP Since
the In addition, In
the structural
2005 in 2011 in and
quota
Act the ,
. CEU eTD Collection http://www.kozlonyok.hu/nkonline/index.php?menuindex=0300&pageindex=0300 23 analysis the reforms. of 2012, in introduced was division majors. these for places scholarship state partial the I engineering, science, technological support to went instead Funding support. state less 50% received also studies studies tw the all, of First changes. quota the among places funded education vocational Facultyof and Training Officer and Sciences Military Facultyof for *Quotas programs Doctoral programs Master programs Undivided programs Bachelor programs VET programs* Undivided and Bachelor VET, of quota funded state of number Total
Magyar Közlöny is available onlineat is available MagyarKözlöny -
Tcncly te tt wtde fo spotn tee rgas Sca science Social programs. these supporting from withdrew state the Technically, . The
39450 12500 56000 ot tiig hne s h ct n h num the in cut the is change striking most 2007 1000 3250 300
from 2010 to 2011 to 2010 from Table 3 40630 11520 56000 different 2008 1000 3500 3050 T, and natural science programs raising not only the full state but also but state full the only not raising programs science natural and T,
.
Patter Source: Magyar Közlöny (2006 Közlöny Magyar Source:
majors. majors. 21700 39750 12500 56000 1000 2950 2009 which will be mentioned in a more detailed manner in the in manner detailed more a in mentioned be will which
ns stateof
o most affected majors were econo were majors affected most o Table Table . 19600 39770 12500 56000 1000 2930 2010 Also
4 36 -
funded places (2005
, there were proportional changes in the st the in changes proportional were there , (below) (below)
19600 40610 10000 53450 1300 2840 2011
The
s - hows the specific majors involved in involved majors specific the hows 2013 e o state of ber scholarship full and partial state scholarship scholarship state partial and full 1 32767 39087 23 1300 2420 3500 State 9600 )
Law Enforcement are not included are LawEnforcement
-
2013) 44637 2012
.
scholarship -
funded places within within places funded
Part mic science and law law and science mic 5550 5550 state - - - -
ial
1668/2012 1668/2012 (XII.21.) dropped dropped Quotas 2013 were - - - - -
ate
- .
CEU eTD Collection It point. starting the as scene negative measures. linking a was it Also, (Act CC of ( and of on EducationAdults Training ( Law Education Vocational National the ( Law Education Public National the including framework Fund. Social European Program) Operatív Megújulás (Társadalmi Program Operational Renewal Social of means the and developm The consideration. policy HE Kálmán Széll science natural informationtechnology science engineeri science social studies law science economic
Basically, the the Basically, official important first The national statenational debt ng/technological ng/technological New Széchenyi Plan Széchenyi New
ent consist of the governmental plans governmental the of consist ent ieog erig Strategy Learning Lifelong - The text evokes the images of a of images the evokes text The IV onhighere
making has to take to has making
Plan major building block of the of block building major
Table 4 published related Széll Kálmán Plan Kálmán Széll The ducation) .
to Distribution quota of
. The strategic and development goals are to be carried out via the the via out carriedbe to are goals development and strategicThe .
documents
different branches of education are governed by the new legal legal new the by governed are education of branches different policy solve thefo to fields byattempting 4200 4700 9850 2750 6250 2010 in March 2011. As a European Union member state, Hungarian state, member Union European a As 2011. March in 850
the
Source: Magyar Közlöny (2009 Közlöny Magyar Source: (“ Europa 2020 Europa document National EducationNational Systems
Act of LXXVII of Act and the and
emphasizes
Act of CLXXXVII of Act on a h et step next the was 2011 war for development and prosperity and development for war
dctoa srtg, ietos ad ol of goals and directions, strategy, educational 37 bu teucmn rfr porm ws the was programs reform upcoming the about e zcey Plan Széchenyi New 5200 6400 9850 2100 4900 2011 before and after the reforms
800 reforms
Széll Kálmán Plan Kálmán Széll taei rmwr eomnain into recommendations framework strategic
), and the National Higher Education Law Education Higher National and the ),
the .
The language The needne f ugra people Hungarian of independence
on v on Act of CXC on public e public on CXC of Act
state scholarship state - after 2012) ocational 10560 ” 4000 4550 1000 100 250
decreasing quotas in 2010. in quotas decreasing
201 . ,
They are funded by funded are They
zl ámnPa 2.0 Plan Kálmán Széll
3). rmer viapolicy various of the plan the of
e
2012 ducation
and depicts a a depicts and partial state partial scholarship focuses 1500 1500 2350 ), the Law Law the ), du from the the from - - -
cation)
the on , ,
CEU eTD Collection w to have future would that ensure governments to goal essential an as set is governments of accountability increasing addressed are issues renew of process the word The are reformers has been fordecades waited word a other as conceptualized In reforms. structural out carrying for justification express who people, Hungarian life of field every in debt i manageon thelong time at the same 200 above pressure blood deep the into them pulls governments. Interna as conceptualized is Debt is saying t declares that the g the that declares the nature of the Hu the of nature al inl oeay ud u t the to due Fund Monetary tional it should not be other people benefiting from benefiting people other be not should it ik of Risk fight the of meansThe s sne f eogn ad eis n h cnet f h people the of consent the on relies and belonging of sense a es ,
reforms are reforms
renew There is a simile comparing debt to an to debt comparing simile a is There ready to face criticism and conflicts and criticism face to ready cleaning up the ruins of the previously failed system. failed previously the of ruins the up cleaning
al potential
is used various times to refer to t to refer to times various used is
power overnment overnment referr interpreted ngarian people ngarian . r t bnft rm hs work this from benefit to are
. In another simile, simile, another In , as an as , ing to the to ing . iareet is disagreement hn te ouet os ak o h iiil on o supporting of point initial the to back goes document the Then, .
A dependence are are eiin s proposed: is decision goes to win to goes
as entitlement ork within such such within ork expected means -
run. need to need to stand on their on stand to The calls document for a
n rfre t Hungary‟ to referred and
to to handle the dangers the handle to by conducting a conducting by , as a as , dangers of debt of dangers acknowledged: acknowledged: loan 38 find the responsible people for the failures the for people responsible the find cut ties with the past the with ties cut
s now or never chance never or now
he up he
ae earlier taken eyn on relying the work of Hungarian people Hungarian of work the rmwr o pltcl accountability. political of framework
octopus that compasses the people and people the compasses that octopus ihr s r h debt; the or us either
own feet and feet own . Addressing people in plural form form plural in people Addressing . - coming changes. changes. coming comprehensive attack comprehensive
h dcmn cam ta the that claims document the are compared to compared are
support, courage and power and courage support,
. The . y h peiu s previous the by fight against debt against fight . Moreover, accountability accountability Moreover, . s te / majority 2/3 the , do not depend on others on depend not do
dpnec on dependence s As a pre a As document is optimistic: is document ,
and , It
as
which serves as as serves which
is understood as understood is h to cannot two the the dangers of dangers the a momen a - condition for condition
to conquer conquer to and that and .
ocialist t that that t
gets and and t he he it it . .
CEU eTD Collection alaptorveny. 24 claimed tostand the and rate employment low the as such the fact, In well. as economy, European contrib can country the economy, Hungarian developing a with and overlap Hungary and Europe of aims the that declares document the Furthermore, competitiveness global boosting Europe strong Program Reform National Hungarian subsistence, debt andstate, state debt and debt enterprises, and debt healthcare, and debt education, and debt transportation, and public debt pension, and debt work, and debt responsibility, and debt reform, constitutional reforms following economy. boost will which debts, of rid getting by country the stabilizing in in published Law Fundamental New the producedeventually which constitution, changed be should that c budget the sophisticated consent without politics laimed that the that laimed
“A MagyarÁl h second The The g previous The
Széll Kálmán Plan Széll Kálmán lamró , which is claimed to be achieved by leaving the leaving by achieved be to claimed is which ,
constitution was not able to protect to able not was constitution in thedynamic way of and l -
r formulated are Az Alaptörvény.” Az Alaptörvény.”
important overnment is criminalized in many ways by stating that they that stating by waysmany in criminalized is overnment ,
deliberately lied, destroyed international credibility of the country, the of credibility international destroyed lied, deliberately and immediately
closes withthe closes uhd h Hnain epe o hole. a to people Hungarian the pushed document and , Kormany.hu
oty n h nm o db m debt of name the in mostly
published in April 2011. It 2011. April in published . Clearly, this section refers to the reform of the the of reform the to refers section this Clearly, . en al t ain ih h Erp 22 Strategy 2020 Europe the with align to able being Reform Program Reform high amount of public debt; public of amount high presenting well . Accessed April 29, 2014. Accessed 29, . April 39
following action plan: following management fund
- balanced development.
the country from drowning into debt into drowning from country the
h pas f h government the of plans the is to solve the structural problems structural the solve to is t t te teghnn o the of strengthening the to ute last trac last .
http://www.kormany.hu/hu/mo/az
sets off with the motto of a of motto the with off sets
ngmn ad renewal: and anagement investment should be put beput investment should
es of the crisis behind crisis the of es two important factors important two
diinly i is it Additionally, As a result, t result, a As April 2011 April conducted conducted
is
and the he he 24 - . ,
.
CEU eTD Collection https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/eurostat_tablak/tabl/teina200.html. 26 25 IMF paidback loanwas was reforms the of measures. introduced the goals main The in GDP. of 80% reached debt public result, a as and GDP of 3% surpasses Reform the on on based p complex a influencing as also but measures individual as only not well out work reforms the case in change dynamic more a with concerned is latter The run. signif dynamic a and conservative wi line in are reforms
See the exact pages in the reference list within section. „Internetwithin sources‟ list reference the exactin pages See the “Az Államháztartás Hiánya ( “Az ÁllamháztartásHiánya clude decreasing public expenditure and public debt. Numerous policy fields are affectedby are fields policy Numerous debt. public and expenditure public decreasingclude - 2.0% in 2012 in 2.0% icant changes icant
Table discurs a From ou Program the tcome the development oftheeconomy.
Hungarian National Reform Progra Reform National Hungarian 5
are already visible. already are
nlds h ms iprat reforms important most the includes f h rfrs Vrs 02 ntjga.u kormany.hu net.jogtar.hu; 2012; (Veres reforms the of
is 26 but promises an overall well overall an promises but
etrd o h fact the to centered while the public debt decreased to approximately 66% of GDP of 66% approximately to decreased debt public the while ive point of view, the view, of point ive
- (“ )Többlete( És (+) h h Erp 22 Strategy. 2020 Europe the th There Analysis onState Budget
(
oe optimistic) more is a general effort to strengthen the state‟s role. state‟s the strengthen to effort general a is
For instance, For 2002 ht since that – 2013).” Apr 2013).” Accessed Reform Progra Reform
40
state budget defic budget state -
m long the on outcome economic functioning one
” and
2013) the Te omr is former The .
nrdcd se below). (see introduced on the on U ceso, tt bde deficit budget state accession, EU
. Two
m
il 29, il keep olicy officially published legislation published officially
scenarios it decreased below 3% as 3% below decreased it
2014. s -
unit repeating
ocre wt less with concerned 25 ih jit effect joint a with . S ). are
pecifically, how much the the much how Some Some presented: a a presented: h tbe is table The , and the and , effects the
it - 27
All policies included in the discussion cover the period before before period coverthe the the included discussion in policies All Table 5
.
CEU eTD Collection The policy environment
according to next elections held in April, 2014. held elections
the Fideszthe 41
- KDNP government
’s
reform strategy (2010 - 2014 27 )
CEU eTD Collection 42
CEU eTD Collection http://www.kormany.hu/en/news/the 28 education professional and programs education m programs, bachelor include education, on focusing centered phrasing the of strength, gifts, their that uni become who people young in ambition nation the of renewal spiritual and mental for need the Law, Fundamental the the claiming justification progr 2.0 Plan Kálmán important: up the of guidelines major the c onstitution
“The New Fundamental Law of Hungary.”Law Fundamental of “The New ams and setting the nextams goals. andsetting the The The to center is period second The 4.2.4.2 the of publication the Following
(HE)
The 2011 of al reforms al technical part o part technical
c o CI o hge e higher on CCIV of Act
opttv kolde Hge euain institution education Higher knowledge. competitive
scientific research and research scientific Plans in Practice: inPractice: Plans
Széll Kálmán Plan - certificate
April2012) ;
follow a
. The Fundamental Law Fundamental The Széll Kálmán Plans Széll Kálmán
law is created in light of the of light in created is law s n spirit and
also belong to belong also
f the the f - - new p ouet n h first the on document up
- coming reforms coming as The The - e porm ad d and programs ter fundamental
Act and the
Hungarian Government Hungarian
2011 Act of CCIV and the the and Act CCIV of 2011
help of ducation create the otrdae pcait riig courses training specialist postgraduate art. s ainl eom Program Reform National higher education higher Hungarian National Reform Program National Hungarian
versity students versity - ugr develop Hungary 01 E Reforms HE 2011 law s and I n line with the Bologna Program Bologna the with line n a framework framework a ca - of was were introduced. introduced. were 43 me into effect on 1 January 2012 January 1 on effect into me of - hungary.
The National Reform Program The National
ulse in published coa programs. octoral responsibility towards the nation the towards responsibility . Accessed Ap Accessed .
Plan , and in the in and ,
progr o increase to Te introduction The . Széll Kálmán Plan 2.0 (December 2.0 (December Plan Kálmán Széll
assessing the results of the reform reform the of results the assessing n t te nrdcin f the of introduction the to and ams
T ril 12, 2014. eebr 2011 December, he thesis he
, the government government the , (HEI) . The major operator of the HE HE the of operator major The . faith in the young generation generation young the in faith
quality P ost
is defined as source of of source as defined is
described t described - eodr vocational secondary fhge education higher of
, p , .
vks h nation the evokes 28 . providing the , rograms
. .
I By sat wt a with starts t accepted he t he ,
rs i the in trust April 2011, April the faith in faith the
wo of
higher higher HE most most Széll Széll
the the Is - CEU eTD Collection rudimentary description ontheexact form conditions. without introduce were statuses 2011; to 2010 from decreased ver first the in detail in included government. the by on said further nothing is there However, Közlö refuse explicitly government enactment government 21) (XII. 1668/2012. remains which in system a but fee tuition no Interestingly, scholarship state Hungarian how to as introduced are authoriza state and Accreditation text. the in emphasized is arena political the from autonomy while state, the remains system
however, ny” In Chapter Chapter In In in the communication even after the quotas were dropped in December 2012 December in dropped were quotas the after even communication the in
2012/176, 29760). 2012/176, 29760). Part 4 Part
set asrequ set the official communi official the , the the , X I ,
Interestingly, Act access in d based on financial conditions; financial on based d irements of establishment of irements ofestablishment
§39, describes the changes in the conditions set for students. New terms are are terms New students. for set conditions the in changes the describes
t cet a tuition a create to s and fund and
Hunga ,
student contract student (2) state funded student q student funded state (2)
sion. To sum up the main points: points: main the up sum To sion. institutions cation refuses to use the word word the use to refuses cation the tdns otiuet tecs o hi studies their of cost the to contribute students ing are related in practice. Three statuses are statuses Three practice. in related are ing rian partial partial rian ot important most
the conditions of the contract other than they are they than other contract the of conditions the
r mitie b isiuinl cos Institutional actors. institutional by maintained are is set as set is dopn te quotas) the (dropping 44 -
e base fee state all HE
(4)
a pre a opnn o the of component oaws cut was uota coasi, and scholarship, Is. and and d
- higher condition of condition student contract was introduced in a a in introduced was contract student tuition
dcto sse” ( system” education (1)
trs y ttn ta “ that stating by starts and redistributed; and , emphasizing that there is is there that emphasizing , tt epniue on expenditure state state Act se lf -
funded - was actually not not actually was financing distinguished . Th . .
In fact, the fact, In enrolme s refusal is “ (3) three three (3)
Magyar Magyar define status
tion tion HE HE the nt. d : .
CEU eTD Collection 32 http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2011/10/7/20111007_nyugat_magyarorszagi_egyetem_felsooktatas. 31 30 http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2011/10/24/Kie_az_egyetem_D278H9. 29 the of length original the the completing scholarship debates. public of the by organization called 2011 discourse, public of amount growing the with Ec chang underpage the the “reforming title 52,thevery first point within contradiction model financing 2013 from as funding of terms further
Mission of Stud of Mission Felsőoktatási TiltakozikEgyetemistaTöbb “EgyreAz Új See more: http://eduline.hu/cimke/fels%C5%91ok 2014. Egyetem?” “Kié Az onomics, 4.2.4.3 31 es , (2) role of state should be should state of role (2) , . 2/2012. (I. 20) (I. 2/2012. In the beginning of 2012, the 2012, of beginning the In introducing Before The 2013) They 29
.
. R s. 2.0 h ms pplr education popular most The HVG Magazin) Magazin) HVG
ent Network (Hallgatói Hálózat). Accesent Hálózat). Network (Hallgatói a been had P
ir Plan ciig n o these of any eceiving ublic Reception a ublic Reception
s tudies il e cr be will
HaHa ( HaHa h document The
sets the government e government Eduline.hu
on o drn te tde period studied the during on going document is that is document they new goals: new ir Hallgatói Hálózat
program h reforms the
e ae aog with along eated
have duline.hu . Accessed April 20, April Accessed . ,
the new a new the nd Modifications: Can There B There Can Modifications: nd
continued to strengthen to continued defines nactment to have to
s (1) from 2012 to 2013, state sup state 2013, to 2012 from (1) . If this requirement is not fulfilled within a time limit of 20 20 of limit time a within fulfilled not is requirement this If . unclear parts unclear
pbi mda a be dbtn aot h up the about debating been has media public , ye of types published published tat%C3%A1si+t%C3%B6rv%C3%A9ny+201.
while it keeps arguing for having less people in HE, HE, in people less having for arguing keeps it while - ct sets the framework for normative funding, (4) a new new a (4) funding, normative for framework the sets ct
rela tdn contract student formal work in Hungary for a time period double than double period time a for Hungary in work formal ; Student Network),which; Student
on st on sed April 20, 2014. 20, April sed e website ted Törvény Ellen.”
2014.
s 45 uet movements tudent institutional development plans. An interesting interesting An plans. development institutional
udent contracts udent iaca support financial
of the first version of the reforms the of version first the of various
HE system” says , (3) 2012 is taken as a transition year in year transition a as taken is 2012 (3) ,
articles
Eduline.hu
( http://hallgatoihalozat.blog.hu/tags/szakmai. with relation in u b the by run ih h lead the with e a C e , which also impacted also which , bu the about onsensus? port in HE in port . Accessed 20, . April also id students binds was formedwas in2011
started
medium Weekly World World Weekly medium “ ing of a newly formed formed newly a of ing increase access
possibilities ata and partial
( July 2012 July has to has during 2014. were clarified were
so be
the volume the the fall of of fall the - decrease that after after that May May 30 ul state full 32 - ”. . coming .
Along
on d CEU eTD Collection http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2012/7/3/Alkotmanyellenes_a_hallgatoi_szerzodes_QBG2UL. 34 http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/hungary 33 (hallgatói self it but July 14 on published e which the by threatened was goods of movement of freedom the and profession, a choose c student tha declaration a released it 2012, July 12 in and conditions the studied Court the result, a As Court. Constitutional the to issue the brought Konferenciája (Hallgatói Unions Student of Conference National called organization Constitutional the forset a limitation expectations. the to according Hungary in working of requirements the completed obligat the from released get can People benefit. unemployment receiving of period and childcare, and pregnancy receiving of period rate. years nactmen
“Visszadobta Az Alkotmánybíróság a Hallgatói Szerződésekről Szóló Szóló Alkotmánybíróság AzSzerződésekről a Hallgatói “Visszadobta From ReformsAway D Signal Drift “Hungary Constitutional - financ
Formal
after graduation after
introduces os ag goes hrl after Shortly Oppo ontracts t
ing status. The former group has group former The status. ing ösztöndíjsze but at the level ofact but atthelevel
sition came from political representatives, civil rights organizations, students, and from from andorganizations, students, rights representatives, politicalcivil camefrom sition employment – is te udmna Law Fundamental the ainst
ÖK tre t Mt Saó te omsinr o Fnaetl ihs who Rights, Fundamental for Commissioner the Szabó, Máté to turned HÖOK) contracts not only for students wi students for only not contracts s to is completing state funded studies or o Hnay I Hungary. of Court the , . It .
, the partial or full state scholarship should be repa be should scholarship state full or partial the , zds ad h lte gop has group latter the and rződés)
be is is
c lvl euain olwd n h fr o the of form the in followed regulation level act can also be administered as administered be also can based on the e the on based overruled.
.
ions if they have three children, are multiply disadvantaged, or or disadvantaged, multiply are children, three have they if ions h Cut lie that claimed Court The trainl rtcs ws lo received also was criticism nternational - the t nactment prev nactment constitutional
34 to sign a document called student scholarship contract scholarship student called document a sign to
as complete complete
46 hs issues these emocracy.”
1,5 times of1,5 times theoriginal timeframe.
th partial or full scholarship scholarship full or partial th - reforms
iously iously voluntary military service (counts double), double), (counts service military voluntary 2/
Rendeletet.” to sign a document called qualification qualification called document a sign to 02 (. 0 g 20) (I. 2012. - signal Spiegel Online Spiegel
overru ant e euae a te ee of level the at regulated be cannot h rgt o ces te reo to freedom the access, to right the - drift Eduline.hu - led by the Constitutional Court Constitutional the by led away . Accessed April 20, April Accessed . Önkormányzatok Országos Országos Önkormányzatok id with a 3 % point interest interest point % 3 a with id
- from overnment . Accessed April 20, . April Accessed - democracy 2012 Act of CXXIII CXXIII of Act 2012 33 but for those for but The reforms also also reforms The . T e
e non he - nactment
a 2014. 2014. - enactment 888064.html.
2014. - profit with
on on ,
CEU eTD Collection http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2012/12/15/Orban_Viktor_keretszamok_bejelentes_AMZH2F. 35 last. programs their employedformallyin being time of amount same the complete to havescholarships full form ofthe of legislati students of representatives societies) right civil self a her or him provide to has institution the contract,scholarship student self the for CCIV of Act the enrollment, for beingfrom released obli programs. abroad study of case in years two maximum for times two aborted be can Hungary in work formal status. scholarship state or partial with students for same contract
“Orbán Viktor: Eltörlik a Felvételi Keretszámok Felvételi Viktor:Eltörlik a “Orbán admission 31 August 2012; August 31 Due D self of case In on
is (képzési szerződés). In 9. §, the §, 9. In szerződés). (képzési e to ue . Instead, . The The - adm
1 finance status students. status finance h to further external push, external further to
668/2012. (XII. 21)668/2012. g 35 owever, there is nothing owever, there isnothing was released was . The . 20 years for completing th completing for years 20 ongoing te t a ata o fl sae coasi place scholarship state full or partial a to itted
student performance and i and performance student
The name The
ea otoeo h osnu was consensus the of outcome legal that ,
- forums and discussions discussions and forums iacn sau, h qualific the status, financing oetc rsue opsto pris suet moveme student parties, (opposition pressure domestic the
, which led to an agreement an to led which , and gat 248/2012. (VIII. 31 (VIII. 248/2012.
ions the contract was was contract the of the of overnment decision on renewal on highereducation. of overnment decision .
A the
written further point point further otat a as cagdt „declaration‟ to changed also was contract
Ren
contract time limit was limit time e requirements remains the same the remains requirements e dszerét.” dszerét.”
ab nst out the out 47 ) clarified. Basically clarified.
itutional itutional conditions g were organized organized were Eduline.hu
overnme is
added to contract ation .
exact Eventually, the government cancelled government the Eventually, shortened
capacity remained capacity ulse n2 eebr21 n the in 2012 December 21 on published . Accessed April Accessed 20, . 2014. t is It nt enactment on implementing the implementing on enactment nt on the admission process stating if the if stating process admission the on content of the content of are
a described. described. ddta a that dded
- so that students with partial and partial with students that so and financing place as an alternative. an as place financing , it it , ewe te oenet and government the between becomes set os o sg te student the sign not does
s
contract.
They are essentially the the essentially are They the financial conditions financial the similarly to the to similarly
period of completing completing of period the main determiner main the the
nts It .
requirement of of requirement , campaigns of of campaigns , It was not until It until not was
remains
Hungary as as Hungary
criteria
quota 2011 a bi a s t
CEU eTD Collection inst categorize modification chapter education Hungarian regulates law system contract student the of basis the established LXX Act the of version both because though, vague itutional autonomy itutional modifying 2011Act CCIVbased am of onthefourth
It seems that the proposed changes were extreme to the traditions of the Hungarian the of traditions the to extreme were changes proposed the that seems It amendment fourth The representing an event an representing
ytm n te oenet a peae for prepared was government the and system the measures, policies are also connected to the aspe the to connected also are policies measures, the legal
once to connected that
framework. .
This tt fnig n higher in funding state .
latest latest
contract h fut amendment fourth the - modificat centered of the Fundamental Law Law Fundamental the of
and
narrative ion was introduced in May 2013 2013 May in introduced was ion declaration dcto cn b can education 48 from
f the of a
are used to refer to the documents in the latestthe in documents the to refer to used are t the highest legal level legal highest the t the first drafts of drafts first the endment Law. theFundamental of was opposition. opposition. Fundamenta connecte e cts of funding, access, funding, of cts nrdcd n ac 21 and 2013 March in introduced the Act the A in the in Law l t wr gvre by governed work to d timeline timeline .
form
to From that point on, point that From se al 6) Table (see t he last important last he the the il ls this close will quality, and and quality, 2013 Act of Act 2013
higher higher .
To To
it
CEU eTD Collection Table 6 . Policy evolution theof 2011 reforms 49
CEU eTD Collection 2010) results 2012) (Berry an in result can participate to tend people young contracts becauseitwas except CCIV be to claimed chang rapidly the on opinion their and students at looks chapter This voice. its raised funding cut Program” 30 among attainment education tertiary increase to o funding Hungary. in policies development to means competitiveness to means as agenda policy European the generations objectives: 4.3 lds should complete tertiary education by 2020. by education tertiary complete should lds
. o i te hne n the in change the is ion , apnd ihn aial one basically within happened What practice, In As Mapping S Besides generally low political participation of young people, there is a relatively relatively a is there people, young of participation political low generally Besides but also in but alsoin and
2011, 16)
shown there is a decrease in t in decrease a is there . .
Furthermore participation . oeo h nta part initial the of Some are the most important characteristics of characteristics important most the are
In Hungary, low political participation political low Hungary, In changing rapidly because t because rapidly changing . Similarl
negnrtoa dmcai def democratic intergenerational n chap in
surveys oninterest poli in the Hungarian approach in 2011 was cent was 2011 in approach Hungarian the . tudents
modified inMay 201 , higher education higher , y, in the studied period since 1989 until today: HEP has always been always has HEP today: until 1989 since period studied the y,in
es n eorpis f Hungary of demographics on ters to reach the Europe the reach to ’
P erceptions in democracy less intensively than intensively less democracy in he number of young people in Europe in youngpeople of number he time time s
ii o Hnain mlyet sind o student to assigned employment Hungarian of limit of the reforms were eventually droppe eventually were reforms the of
year on pol i Hnay zoig n university on zooming Hungary, in people young he majority of the of majority he policy tics andissues inpublic The ide The
3 50
otr cnmc development economic foster . 2020 ob 2020 s rsne i te rvos timeline previous the in presented as
ing higher education higher ing Related
- (HEP) icit 34 a
at the supra the at
can be shown be can students and their and students year olds year jective n sm dge o marginalization of degree some and
to this objective, Hungary promised promised Hungary objective, this to has gained a central position within position central a gained has modifications of modifications
ered to debt management and management debt to ered and stating that stating
to 30,3 % 30,3 to - national level national n uoen Union European on
( not only not older generations older
“ (HE) Tudományos DiákKör
compared to the older older the to compared interests
40% of 30 of 40%
( environment. “ Nati
in voter turnout voter in the s h youth the as d and European European and
is to increase increase to is ? o 2011 Act of Act 2011 nal Reform nal First of all, of First - 34 , which which ,
policy policy One .
year It is It it ”
CEU eTD Collection is organization the concludes. (OFÉSZ) Education Higher 127) 1998, cut (KDNP) Forum Hungarian the during An Bertalan Cult access and funding to “Diá connected all protests main movements education and left the „student originally depoliticized became students transition, worked transition democratic nevertheless movements con arena political the towards 296) 1942, (Schumpeter societies (Nárai Western and States United the behind lags that Hungary in society civil young
et f h yug ii society civil young the of text in ktüntetések 1995 the funding impacting welfare services as as services welfare impacting funding the The first The students Later, Assuming
oehr ih ii rgt advocates. rights civil with together coalition
via n alliance an Te eosrtos ee consider were demonstrations The .
since the regime change in 1989/1990 in change regime the since
unions 2004, 632). 2004, 632). movement drásfal . As a result, in September, students organized a demons a organized students September, in result, a As . that politicians seek reelection so they make policies to win public support, public win to policies make they so reelection seek politicians that basically basically milieu‟ (Sza
- in Hungary. in representing
ben, 2006 ben, ( any asd hi vie hn t ae to came it when voice their raised mainly Alliance of Alliance y published an enactment in August 1990 on 1990 August in enactment an published y
a group of people that do not vote nor show high level of interest interest of level high show nor vote not do that people of group a ae ln pltcl rdto. hy a an had They tradition. political long a have are was connected to connected was
the predecessor in title of today‟s most prominent student union student prominent most today‟s of title in predecessor the
of Democrats (MDF) (MDF) Democrats of not - bó ban
Student hostels cre hostels Student likely to be to likely
their interests. their 1998, 123 Young Democrats Young n lw oiia priiain f on people, young of participation political low and és 2012 The Alliance was registered in September 1989 and and 1989 September in registered was Alliance The ,
which wa which -
- 51 ben” a
124).
target group of favorable pol favorable of group target decrease in nominal state funding state nominal in decrease
ed successful as the National Alliance for for Alliance National the as successful ed social allocation social Student alliances were formed. formed. were alliances Student
Looking at a at Looking 2012; , it can be concluded that there were there that concluded be can it , s partly due to the fact that FIDESZ being being FIDESZ that fact the to due partly s
ated –
n Hungary in
Christian
“A informal ne informal - z OFÉSZ Krónikája” OFÉSZ z 2014 eae plce ( policies related historical timeline of student of timeline historical
and meal allowance meal and Democrat ), financial issues in higher higher in issues financial
eaeapltcl party political a became tworks, conferences and and conferences tworks, a
important role in the the in role important new funding scheme funding new tration against the the against tration icies c People‟s ic zb 1998; Szabó
either . Mini - fe the After European
student the In . ). (Szabó ster
Party
four
of
CEU eTD Collection 36 ban é elections cut financial Finally, protesters continued. movement Although A time, This fee. tuition of introduction the ( introduced was fee students of perspective the from loan effective an of establishment the with h on act the after introduced requiremen the set results The peaceful agenda political the on appeared also involved Önkormány Hallgatói organization MSZP) MSZP)
“ bout Az OFÉSZ Krónikája.” Accessed April 23, April Accessed Krónikája.” Az OFÉSZ starting in199 s 2012 The third important movement took place in 1995 in place took movement important third The event next The 20 student 12000
– h g the and resulted and
made
Lajos Bokros Lajos o negotiate to Alliance of Free Liberals (SZDSZ) government. Again, the de the Again, government. (SZDSZ) Liberals Free of Alliance - b s
Te e sae in stayed fee The . en” 2012 en” in the vrmn introduced overnment
the acquirement of the first HE first the of acquirement the y iitr f iac Ljr ors uig h Hu the during Bokros Lajor Finance of Minister by 4. 36 drafting
. in a negotiation between s between negotiation a in s
). Then
ok place took n mdae bten hm and them between mediated and went to talk to the people, people, the to talk to went
gathered at the Ministry of Finance to express their opposition. opposition. their express to Finance of Ministry the at gathered
, Prime Minister Gyula Horn invited the representatives of the the of representatives the invited Horn Gyula Minister Prime , igher education is accepted with a beneficial taxation system and system taxation beneficial a with accepted is education igher of the
ts for tuition fee introduction fee tuition for ts . Finally, the Finally, .
of of legislation 1993 A zatok zatok n eebr 1992 December in
the
2014. h mnhy fee monthly the MDF Országos Konferenciája (HÖOK). (HÖOK). Konferenciája Országos ct onhigher education http://www.hallgatoimozgalom.hu/posts/2 - everybody scheme. scheme.
1993 Act on higher education higher on Act 1993 52 ni te iez government Fidesz the until - KD
deg
tudent union tudent NP government NP ree the stud the OFÉSZ would have had to pay to had have would
free (“Diáktüntetések 1995 (“Diáktüntetések free hn h itouto o tiin fee tuition of introduction the when but
- h mmes f h government. the of members the ent 1996 when the when 1996 evaluated the outcome successful outcome the evaluated
ae p oe f the of some up gave
and government representatives. government and stating that tuition can only be be only can tuition that stating s were not convinced and their their and convinced not were s , as well .
Demonstrations remained Demonstrations gra Scait Party Socialist ngarian .
bate was centered to to centered was bate -
inn the winning az „ introduced tuition tuition introduced The Alliance The Bokros package Bokros -
ofesz a monthly fee monthly a - - kronikaja. ben,
proposed proposed
2006 2002 was
‟ - .
CEU eTD Collection 37 abou finally, and improvement; 2011, since years past the of conditions changing so introduced the reforms, the of arguments the about think system education higher public supported feasible a not is education from legislation exch decreased based Hungary still the of because policy funding new the of basis theme students. for point fee October. in streets issue the the on decided Fidesz to by initiated referendum went a Eventually, students and place take not did consensus final a settle, HÖOK reacted Party. Students Socialist introduced
“
National E National was rejectedwas includes ange for that, the that, for ange
of the events the of
lal, oe f h iiil eom dd o wr ot D out. work not did reforms initial the of some Clearly, (HaHa) Network Student organization civil a 2012, In During tried to convince the convince to tried to lection for all HE participants under the name of „development contribution‟ by the the by contribution‟ „development of name the under participants HE all for
stud
h sm aon o employment of amount same the
an online questionnaire was conducted. conducted. was questionnaire online an 2011 Act on higher education higher on Act 2011 h fal the . on the length of their program although the although program their of length the on in 2008
Thus Office.” Accessed MayOffice.” 2014. 31, ent contract binding students with state funded state with students binding contract ent
Similarly .
In this case, this In
, o 20, tdns oiie aan s uto fe wa fee tuition as again mobilized students 2006, of l state state institutional capabilityinstitutional student and 37 .
option option abolished
government
o h previous the to
. similarly to tuition as before. as tuition similarlyto V stud on the long the on arious
the yearly announcement of state of announcement yearly the ent cont ent not to introduce fees. Although fees. introduce to not has been has modific
http://www.valasztas.hu/en/ovi/287/287_0.html.
before consensus before 53 confrontations - ract was ract run.
ations, discussions, and forums and discussions, ations, s h lnt o state of length the as
also problematic also Introducing tuition fee in a mainly state mainly a in fee tuition Introducing the other important theme important other the n h floig te eut wl be will results the following, the In
performance
initial double length of time was was time of length double initial ,
The student union organization union student The u in cut
was reached was lutions to the problems, the the problems, the to lutions became - : ec in work and stay to places
the introdu the
. To assess what students students what assess To . esn access reasing udn ws h central the was funding
decide -
funded places ( places funded
h mi connecting main the psil ies on ideas possible t there were efforts to to efforts were there - udd studies funded . T .
he final version version final he who gets in ction of tuition of ction s about to be be to about s
, being the being , took place took
to higher higher to quota . .
In - ) ,
CEU eTD Collection responses. of distribution agree „I item every at source the indicating the from included were arguments major shortened and quotations Full ofmiddle thescale, feel they stated people) feel “I was 5 and changes” the about marked (45%) respondents elaborating personal scaling closed system. HE of assessment and rates, participation on reforms the of assessment reforms, the for arguments and in a VET bachelor program. areThese in indicated both relevant people grou * Other (undivided program) M Bachelor p VET program of distribution education higher Thus, eliminated. the presented. Table 7 Two people indicated enrolledTwoto be people in inparallel a aster p responses of 2 people 2 of responses Question 3 Question Question governmental of assessment themes: four on relies questionnaire the of rest The . ‟ rogram Question 1: .
iue 4 Figure rogram Altogether
educational attainment - ye usin n a otoa open optional an and question type
2
ny tdns ih urnl atv status active currently with students only
program assesses felt (below) (below)
Number of respondents based on enrollment higher in education program* measures opinion
123 ing somewhat informeding completely uninformed completely
The argument where more people selected „I partly agree‟ than „I „I than agree‟ partly „I selected people more where argument The from PhD programs and and programs PhD from
people resp people
available s 4 on a scale a on 4 governmental communication governmental . includes
how informed participants participants informed how 8 28 69 16
. Interestingly, in in Interestingly, .
of the respondents the o absolutel m nded from 1 from n Hungary in aster and in in aVETaster and program,while on introduced introduced hree vrin f the of version shortened , but on but , 54 , while , , but not confident not aboutit. , but -
y informed about the changes”. Only 3% (3 3% Only changes”. the about informed y 5 where 1 was “I feel “I was 1 where 5 6 out of 7 questions, 7 of out 6 3 people who people 3 ly 118 ly measures, opinion on expected effects of of effects expected on opinion measures, . 23% of the people can be found in the in found be can people the of 23% - epne t q to Responses ne oe wih ie sae for space gives which one, ended (see Table about responses were responses ps table. in this feel are included included are 7% 23% 57% 13%
the reasons the The last theme consists of a a of consists theme last The
bu te ref the about finished their studies their finished 7
seven arguments and the the and arguments seven ). e
wasin enrolled absolutely
eto 1 uestion
most people selected people most Széll Kálmán Plans Kálmán Széll
rm l tps of types all from analyzed because because analyzed for
orms. Most Most orms. the reforms. reforms. the
uninformed uninformed parallel inparallel hw the show
were
a
CEU eTD Collection arai.html http://www.origo.hu/itthon/20120120 38 about was competitive econ from support state taking about was engineering sciences, natural of importance the questioning about con Thisattemptcreated to. what studyand not to what students influence to attempt the indeed was reforms the of parts sensitive most the of One about argument the of case in clear less was agreementHowever, agreed. respondents the of majoritythe arguments, refe agree‟
“ Kihirdették .
institutional quality assessmentinstitutional rd o the to rred
a Tandíjakat: 150ezer és Egymillió Közötta S 150ezerTandíjakat: Egymillió és a in the job market job the in
too much funding spent funding much too iceac bten ao mre ad HE and market labor between discrepancy -
felsooktatas 38 . Finally, the topic the Finally, - allamilag
(14 p mc ad a suis wih were which studies, law and omics 55
on students acquiring non acquiring students on eople selectedeople -
finanszirozott lágerszakokon.
that flicts
people tended to be to tended people - keretszamok
” because the discussion was never thediscussion because
Origo.hu „I donotknow‟). or IT programs. Rather, it it Rather, programs. IT or .
- Acessed es I cs o al other all of case In . - - az competitive degree competitive - onkoltseges
April April the
lo en as seen also 27, 27, least certain least - 2014. kepzes - s . CEU eTD Collection Don‟t know Iagree I agree partly I donotagree Don‟t know Iagree I agree partly I donotagree Don‟t know Iagree I agree partly I donotagree Don‟t know Iagree I agree partly I donotagree
Figure Figure 4.
communication explaining the justification of the introduction of reformsthe
an Disc be assessed Performance institution of or remain behind left finish donot inMany students time competitive degrees much spentToo onnon funding
Question 3: d higherd education repancy between market labor Please evaluate the following
s needs to 56 -
measures leave the country competitive with Many students degrees interest of Some notservethe do institutions Plan Plan Széll Kálmán Plan (2011) and Széll Kálmán Source original of quotations and arguments: languages foreign Learning important is 2.0
(2012)
taken governmentfrom the
See thein appendix. economy
CEU eTD Collection becauseto tell changes‟ various of popular the seemedtobe incaseofquota t 5, Question applicants. of number the increase would abolishment quota HE. for applying t students most that show Results long the is HE for applying people of number the on reforms the from studies law economics and l scienceprograms engineering/IT/natural m time in program competing not of case in education r a d q contract student c contract 1 introduction.) evalua Please, (Q4: essstate eturning 50% of costs of ofcosts eturning 50% urrent version of the ofthe urrent version bolishment of quota (2012) quota bolishment of st ownsizing HE arena ownsizing HE ualificationcontract ore state ore
student contract, and the second second the and contract, student version of the student student version ofthe
(2011) Question 5 investigates 5 Question 4 Question - **Requiressame ofthe time employment Hungarian amount in as th funding for funding - - *Requires double amount *RequiresHungariandouble of timeemployment in HE of statelength funded program.as the term effects of the following policy measures on participation in higher education?) higher in participation on measures policy following the of effects term funding for funding
here was one response one was here
(2013)
In
(2012)
investigates
e h floig oiy esrs ae o hw utfe yu id their find you justified how on based measures policy following the te case of quota abolishment, there were altogether 35 people indicating people 35 altogether were there abolishment, quota of case
Table I do not think is do I it 60 35 37 45 40 40 47 80
8 justified
student expectations on the effects of two important measures important two of effects the on expectations student . Questi how i h s t s measuring clarity of the events the of clarity measuring
51% 30% 31% 39% 34% 34% 40% 68% Number of responses and respo and Numberofresponses uh that ought reforms the by introduced measures actual
he abolishment of quotas ( quotas of abolishment he on 4:
In some cases it is Insomecases Assessing policy measures 57 29 55 37 45 23 44 27 35
justified
tdn cnrc would contract student 25% 47% 32% 38% 19% 38% 23% 30%
e length elength HE of state funded program. (see Figure 5 (seeFigure nse as % of all response all nseas %of ihn hs sub these Within 52 26 19 30 35 25 11 19 It isjustified It Q5:
. The answer „It is diffi is „It answer The .
What do you think about think you do What
44% 22% 17% 25% 30% 21% 16% 9%
below indicate less people people less indicate
abolishment ) . The first one one firstThe .
- I do not know do I are 14 20 questions of of questions 2 0 3 1 0 4
s
assessed
. 12% 17%
2% 0% 3% 1% 0% 3% that that cult
. CEU eTD Collection linkedfreethoughts tothe current any toshare highereducation inHungary further system that to the of elements following the with satisfied demand. Accor contract. the about brought changes for demand less studying people of number between relation the about think you do What finishing stay students making by affected be would mobility that argument published Figure Figure 5 Table 9 ,
Question 7 assesses 7 Question 6 Question Question 8 provides 8 Question
. Student contract and its expected effect on state I know donot willThere willThere willThere be higher . Question 6: it is difficult to tell because tell because to it difficultis More people will apply for apply willMore people It will not change anythingchange It willnot - Less people for willapply Lesspeople funded of the various changesof various the tdig abroad studying about about applications be no change in the be lower d se al 9) Table (see HE HE studies HE HE studies
education The expected I do I notdo know
abroad?
the overall HE system HE overall the optional space to elaborate on personal opinions personal on elaborate to space optional applying for demand for emand
(Bojár 2013; Jandó 2013; Jandó 2013; (Bojár wie 5 si tee ol b mr dmn de o the to due demand more be would there said 75% while ,
zooms for for
The responses show that nobody thought there would be would there thought nobody that show responses The effect abolishmentof quota of
0 demand for studying studying abroad 2 higher education 8 8 education
14 n tdn contract student on Hungarian h Hungarian ig o 3, hr wud be would there 23%, to ding 17 19 58 23
27 abroad
studying abroad th 35
cniin of conditions e
( 50 the Q7: Please, evaluate how much much how evaluate Please, Q7:
number peopleof applying for igher education igher
abroad Makki 2012) Makki
. 83
t reacts It
100 on numberthe peopl of
tdn cont student 2 0 27 89
quota Abolishing contract Student
. The question asks: question The . system
2% 0% 23% 75%
o h commonly the to no
( in Hungary in
Q8:
change in the the in change . ract and the the and ract ) . Please, feel feel Please,
C onnected onnected you higher
e after after
are .)
CEU eTD Collection „already question. qual access, change what bydistinguished opinions students‟ respondentsindicating thatmost in were notinterested opportunities loan student frequently. th of results the by supported is assumption curriculum Besides, satisfaction of level their as 3 selected respondents 40 as points admission feedback. positive most ra and Mobility people. 42 by 3 as and 30 by 2 a as assessed 29 and 2 a as it scoring 42% with results similar and 2 a as popular, less also was system HE of Transparency it‟. with satisfiedcompletely 1 of list the on 3 scored nge of available programs, the quality of programs, and the application system recei system application the and programs, of quality the programs, available of nge
al 10 Table 7, Question Regarding n i s; o te peet i present they how so; if and
employed 4 o them of 84% None of the respondents belonged to the group of PhD students or to the group of group the to or students PhD of group the to belonged respondents the of None
32 Competitiveness t, n isiuinl autonomy. institutional and ity, ewe 1 n 3 and 1 between % as as %
nlds h cdd nepeain f h rsoss o usin about 8 Question to responses the of interpretation coded the includes
after graduationafter a 3. Assessment of the quality of information and communication has has communication and information of quality the of Assessment 3. a
- marked 5 where 1 was „I am not satisfied with it, at all‟ and 5 was „I am „I was 5 and all‟ at it, with satisfied not am „I was 1 where 5 epnet gv ls stsid edak n h yal lmt of limit yearly the on feedback satisfied less gave Respondents
eevd h mo the received
f ugra degree Hungarian of indicating , responde
the ‟, therefore all 30 respo‟, therefore all
. aeoiain eis n h dimen the on relies Categorization t. rprin f hoeia/rcia kolde n the in knowledge theoretical/practical of proportion t i general in nts policy e open e st that 59
loehr 0 epe nwrd h optional the answered people 30 Altogether I o o know‟ not do „I to react measurethey % hs proportion this
as a 3. a as - s ended question w question ended
scored these
ee o stsid ih access with satisfied not were nses were inthe coding included Similarly, c Similarly,
loan
other scholarship programs scholarship other rud 3 around s .
4 pol, 36%) people, (42
a nt sufficient not was , whether they propose a a propose they whether , ost of participation of ost here the here
n average on
in of sions with that option. that with
issue came up came issue 31 % scored it it scored % . funding, answer Finally, ved the the ved This . .
36 , the , was was .
% s
CEU eTD Collection Table
10 . Question 8: Assessment of student opinions 60
CEU eTD Collection 61
CEU eTD Collection difference regional the taking level introduced first be should very diffusion more the centralization, from reforms education other with linked up, introd funding well), as respondents, students the by ackno were to referred communication government problems most 3, Question with the about correct is it though even and clichés of full rudimentary, reflect have hardand tolearn without work that type b have will she or he has, one degree what matter „no the to referring idea, interesting an proposes cou the serve not do that companies that argue actually eco suchwithout an involvement because off better is state that argued also is It process. the shape will market as study should students long non and competitive between dilemma the solve would latter the that arguing forces market and involvement state compared these of Some „other‟. as labeled did that opinions of nomists will work as economists as work will nomists - of run. This economic approach suggests that there is no nee no is there that suggests approach economic This run. uced. First, it is argued that HE reformarguedHE is that it First, uced.
etter chances for finding a job‟ a finding for chances etter In the „other‟ category, two proposals emerged as to what policy measures can be be can measures policy what to as emerged proposals two category, „other‟ the In argument of line different A A w there above, table the in summarized arguments and topics the Besides
rtcl huhs n h cnet f h pa. is, t s rud ht the that argued is it First, plan. the of content the on thoughts critical stud is mentioned the most oftenis mentioned themost as nother ies matter, s matter, ies ie of line most
o fly eog o n o te aeois Fr hs reason this For categories. the of any to belong fully not tudents should not think that think not should tudents opinion
E ntttos r poues f okoc fr i multi big for workforce of producers are institutions HE s
mre agig t arguing emerged s
ntry‟s economy as smaller businesses smaller as economy ntry‟s
it will not be not blamedcareer will fordifficulties. it or engineers will work as engineers later. Some other Some later. engineers as work will engineers or discourse. The proposal is that is proposal The discourse.
is centered to the the to centered is an it selects wrong measures to solve them solve to measures wrong selects it effort
example for such measures. should not be a top a be not should 62
to improve, nothing will work will to improve, out. nothing
hat it cannot be taken for granted that that granted for taken be cannot it hat having a degree solve degree a having zl Klá Plan Kálmán Széll d for the state to decide what decide to state the for d - down approach but a bottoma but approach down - competitive degrees on the the on degrees competitive
problems problems although although
Second, . s
do . Both responses responses Both . everything. They everything. degree (as can be seen seen be can (as . A respondent respondent A
ere a number number a ere .
, they were were they , Decreasing nta of instead s and and s - wledged wledged s of the the of s national ln is plan the the s
CEU eTD Collection to improve how consideration into country
students assess the the assess students
the
HE system. reason
. In sum In
s
of the of , the responses the , reforms, 63
the introduced measures, introduced the proved to be to proved
very useful to get insight get to useful very and and the possibilities possibilities the to
CEU eTD Collection ihr dcto. ult educatio Quality education. higher policy education higher of students. of requirements car future general define necessary not to do programs but specific Consequently, majors employers. specific to limited not are with students equips prominence gained have programs state the at competitiveness is education Higher state over Commission the to influence more giving occurred also authori stat globa The policy. education higher today‟s thus, and system, education higher and tothe communication governmental the at looked that approach discursive a with completed was (HE) education higher case meso trends), (Hungariancont supranational and (global macro relevant the reveal to approach structural re education policy education higher of directions international 5.1 e
.
– Thus, ty of states. A shift between European Union European between shift A states. of ty Finally, in Europe, the aging society adds a demographic ch demographic a adds society aging the Europe, in Finally, Results (1) questions the answer To Assessing ihr dcto institution education higher
policyevolution ofthe
the recurring reference point is point reference recurring the om efcie n i tee a there is and effective forms
show that globalization, massification globalization, that show ext) and micro (students educationand inHungary andhigher ext)
strongly connected to employability at the individual level and economic economic and level individual the at employability to connected strongly the Reforms,Defining the Gap
rms. refo .
- The soluti The
and at the supranational the at and
o conducting For 2011 C i as esnil o ae ihr dcto institutions education higher make to essential also is n
HAPTER rela n h lbr akt Also, market. labor the in ons promote increasing funding increasing promote ons
Act CCIVonhighereducation of in elcs oe uooy f ntttos n less and institutions of autonomy more reflects tion h w os h Hnain ae opy ih the with comply case Hungarian the does ow
the nat the 64 5.
remaining
F h plc analysis, policy the ional policy analysis of the 2011 Hungarian Hungarian 2011 the of analysis policy ional INDINGS - -
level. Vocational education and training training and education Vocational level. making? and state and
and internationalization shape internationalization and
oiy gap? policy - and (2) (2) and level legislation of HE policy HE of legislation level kls ht ihr education higher that skills allenge t allenge - level policy objectives. objectives. policy level the and widening access to to access widening and
. a
h thesis the ) levels tothe linked ) e h 21 higher 2011 the re structural approach approach structural o the dimensions dimensions the o e pas of plans eer pten on pattern l ple a applied
today‟s today‟s
CEU eTD Collection the (3) sta of prominence characterizedby elements. social the to belong also (2) changes unemployment of rate high people the as such findings out carry to responsibility winning; fight, war, of and of graduating people the means policy power) in was an8 won the following elections, the (1) include elements) discursive ref HE 2011 the of narrative the shape preferencesindividual policy inter very a represents case Hungarian the context, this Within above. the of all of basis the is autonomy institutional course, Of well. as them, for worth be would HE into invested effort and money, time, that so students capital. human valuable of sources people with competitive degrees competitive with people
imth ewe H ad ao mar labor and HE between mismatch about , the ,
fields to debt to fields D political, following The introduction of student contracts and contracts student of introduction iscursive elements iscursive the lack of people people the lack of growing educational attainment, educational growing ; (3) (3) ; ;
2 a et aaeet cin plan action management debt a (2)
and late,
management by promoting economic interests of the state as opposed to opposed as state the of interests economic promoting by management
rwn nme o edry people, elderly of number growing of students. of the governmental identification of identification governmental the the the lack of competit of lack
n o the on and h plans the rely on rely with techn
seily o te young the for especially discursive, - year H duringwhich the longperiod
te who images of ruins of images - . formation of a new government in 2010 (Fidesz 2010 in government new a of formation funding in HE in funding
C The The ical skills meiiees f d of ompetitiveness sig oiy prah a apoc ta connects that approach an approach: policy esting leave the country the leave orms. / mjrt cnetaie as conceptualized majority 2/3 ket needs, needs, ket ive degrees ive s social, legal, and economic elements are elements economic and legal, social, o the new approach of quota management quota of approach new 65 il elements cial
Legal elements Legal is, the First,
growing tertiary education attainment education tertiary growing ).
; (2) the (2) ; left by the previous government; previous the by left
the aiming for renewal by every possible possible every by renewal for aiming
that . Student Student .
hi HEP problems HEP , p
the cost too much money, much too cost the the drop gh ltcl elements olitical nld () demog (1) include egrees Act of CCIV on higher education higher on CCIV of Act
are bad quality of VET programs, VET of quality bad eraig ubr f young of number decreasing
(1) the (1) oeet opsn the opposing movements is - out rates; rates; out
ungarian Socialist Partyungarian Socialist lo motn fr the for important also
(as the claims about claims the (as
policy environment environment policy
entitlement and and entitlement aog ih the with (along raphics the number of of number the ; (4) and the and (4) ;
the number number the found to found
- - and the and images images related related KDNP ;
CEU eTD Collection improved programs should be technical s lack people of with abroad after graduation competitive degrees go peoplethe with labor market: t mismatch between HE and competitive degrees labor market mismatch between HE and Problem revealed about the currently valid version of the Aft again. Another reforms. of scenario funding and access after happened which quota One parts. problematic these were year,there one Within D o some and solutions the was with agree not did they What reforms. the introducing for arguments governmental the with agreed mostly and further ofthelegacyfinancialcrisis) traces ofthe E the of act conomic elementsconomic omestic and international criticism also pointed out the weak points of the 2011 reforms. 2011 the of points weak the out pointed also criticism international and omestic Linking the micro the Linking
kills, VET r okn a all at looking er Constitutional Court Court Constitutional : lack: of oo many of
include the include
Table 1 - level to the rest of the findings, it can be concluded that students that concluded be can it findings, the of rest the to level taken into account flexibility HE of notis good at study anddo what they are motivating students to lack proper of means reforms introduction of remainedGap after the or qualityor terms of funding, access, were not improved in existing VET programs stay motivation for students to lack economic of various relevant modification was funding, which eventually which funding, was modification
f hs iprat oiiain ws h dlto o student of deletion the was modifications important these of national state debt and deficit of state budget ( budget state of deficit and debt state national 1 . Defining and explaining policy gaps o vrue h frt tep t rglt suet contracts. student regulate to attempt first the overrule to
modifications and amendments trying to find a way to fix to way a find to trying amendments and modifications ees n cnet, h floig oiy as a be can gaps policy following the contexts, and levels
the
66
Act of CCIVonhighereducation: of Act to HE decreased significantly due significantly decreased HE to f the specific policy measures introduced. introduced. measures policy specific the f .
quota need improveto VET programs it cut but the government communication referred to the salaries Hungaryin employment opportunities there are significant differences between future professions of people meannot directing whatstud supportstate meannot economics and law studies lose all engineering, IT, andnatural sciences should pushing competitive for degrees such as Explanation
that majors completely define
ents should study should
started to increase increase to started due to due
and amount of
to the first the to IMF loan IMFloan CEU eTD Collection be problematic was perspective the of framework the within decisions fragmented creating were government the with Reforms 5.2 decisions by a stable,well providing b the funding caused state of redistribution via programs between differentiating time same the at and goal. legitimate competitive programs funding lacked attheend. education higher on funding overall context the in happened funding state of redistribution that was problem The either. debates large cause not did programs science natural and IT, engineering, Supporting the conseq well. as Europe, in countries other of number a in used contracts enrollment to resembles contract This conditions. financial pub the to acceptable also was promoting 1,5 within program a finish
the l the sc idea asic
Changes and efforts aiming aiming efforts and Changes Recommendations Policy a was students of project serious more a of part education higher making all, After of subject not were ideas initial the of Some controversies and opposition. opposition. and controversies have to deal with the mult the with deal to have imitations imitations
uence of the uence ofthe language o rfrig ihr dcto was education higher reforming of s oee, g However, resulting from them. from resulting learning
demonstrations seen seen nrlzn te titr odtos o al state all for conditions stricter the eneralizing . The contract self that studentswith esnbe hl solving while reasonable lic as it did not come with a binding force but with cla with but force binding a with come not did it as lic times times ca u se Dropping the quota was also welcomed, however, it was was it however, welcomed, also was quota the Dropping - iple dimensions involved in higher education policy and and policy education higher in involved dimensions iple functioning framework. More importantly, it caused importantly,it More mrvmn are improvement
of
higher education was only seen through the lenses of of lenses the through seen only was education higher andcriticism other
In the Hungarian case, most problems articulated by articulated problems most case, Hungarian the In t oiia length original its n ta ohrie oua ad internationally and popular otherwise that and 67
debates. These include the requirement to requirement the include These debates.
o ep epe ae infor make people help to
seta for essential them and notagoal introduced originally
or the importance of policies policies of importance the or emd o be to seemed o o never or now -
financing statushave tosign confusion. confusion.
long - term development. development. term -
udd programs funded Ironically, one of Ironically,of one ru a of more discourse of e career med decreasing decreasing rity over over rity . The sh sh . CEU eTD Collection contract ofact light in (e reintroduced be psychology) should exams oral skills, specific require that programs schools secondary in established be should state interest level state to solely down salaries emerged. the from recommendations student and findings the education features essential the of some overlooking in resulted which management, debt - funded and self and funded First, First, . Second, c Second, .
. The outco The . Fin . both public and private sector private and public both ally, ompetitiveness is an international concept, international an is ompetitiveness - me led to opposition, confusion opposition, to led me financed ual job opportunities inHungary. jobopportunities ual generalizations generalizations
places .
Third, a more more a Third,
based on performance on based should be revised about revised be should
to help people make informed decisions informed make people help to should be motivat be should 68
flexible system flexible ,
questionnaire and implementation problems. implementation and
.
Fourth, Fourth,
ed thus, it it thus, state to provide provide to , should be created be should - funded places funded the following following the career service counseling counseling servicecareer should not be narrowed narrowed be not should more competitive more . g. teaching, teaching, g. suggestions and student and . Fifth, Fifth, . of higher higher of B between ased on on ased for
CEU eTD Collection policy. education higher demonstrations of byintroducing modified state on limitation reflections we unions the was autonomy Institutional quality. and access funding, increasing of goals European the to needs domestic and patterns of features on little and management t Furthermore, later. only defined communicated. poorly and unclear, reforms policy The valid. be to out turned policy education higher of patterns glo and European the and took policy Hungarian the directions the between mismatch multi their by shaped asse the state l east i east
times various amended got and evolved policy the As fragmented, were Instead,they introduction. their upon effective not were reformsThe multi The ssment of student perspectives student of ssment - has funded funded nfluenced re notinvolved , it improved in content. in improved it ,
also gis te reforms the against been
- studies. studies. level analysis, the discursive a discursive the analysis, level system - udd lcs a dropp was places funded field field identified. - ee plc context. policy level
the same length for engaging in engaging for length same the
in the drafting. within the discourse. the within – lhuh cness a rahd fe a ae f student of wave a after reached was consensus a Although
.
most unusual element of the student contract remained in the the in remained contract student the of element unusual most Thus C
HAPTER
, the reforms did not completely fit into global directions global into fit completely not did reforms the , Funding and access were access and Funding he th , In
demonstrated governmental governmental ms cuil and crucial most e matching ay ae, nw ocp ws nrdcd but introduced was concept new a cases, many
6. h mi pooiin ht hr i a expected an is there that proposition main The
69 C d Te odtos f the of conditions The ed. ONCLUSIONS
Another important problem was that student that was problem important Another
pproach ihr dcto policy education higher
the various ways the ways various the icus fcsd o mc o debt on much too focused discourse
Hungarian employment as the length length the as employment Hungarian , the policy evolution timeline, and and timeline, evolution policy the , –
finally increased and centralized and increased finally
t due to critical social and legal legal and social critical to due
te rdtos f Hungarian of traditions the o - gap un gap
contract were also also were contract
2011 with re
solved by the the by solved reforms were were reforms international was was bal bal or
CEU eTD Collection studying policy dimension interesting an be would contract student the of implementation syste education higher centralized more the of effects the policyenvironment remain of harmonization effective th remain autonomy institutional and quality access, funding, of Aspects objectives. and trends European specifically, more and global with line state the of some out point also and policy education higherof limitations the of some reformshighlight 2011 The participation. foraccess growing state and institutions education high to linked is capital human of Production world. globalized the of integration increased importance inpolicydiscussions. wh problems, these to solutions presents approximatebest state; the return a to contribute that responsibilities and rules about brings to way t and development of means important most the of one is today education extend to is goal the education, higher In policy. public of world globalized today‟s as science Related to the topic of the thesis, further research might be able to reveal the long revealtoablethe be might furtherresearchofthethesis, topic the to Related To t short, In extend access extend there is no legitimacy for such an investment fr investment an such for legitimacy no is there it sheds it conclude - making under similar majority conditions might might underinclude similar majoritythecaseconditions making Hungary. of
h the interests of the individu the of interests the
e thesis contributes to the larger discussion of public of discussion larger the to contributes thesis e light on the contradictions of interests of contradictions the on light cnrlzto o hge euain rns bu lmttos u t the to due limitations about brings education higher of centralization ,
involves state funding. The question emerges whether funding always always funding whether emerges question The funding. state involves . Issues of centralization and decentralization are inherent elements elements inherent are decentralization and centralization of Issues .
policies s
challenging -
funding plays an important role in providing equal and and equal providing in role important an plays funding
in the way the in
c ae o nw bt r lkl t gi more gain to likely are but new, not are ich for policy al, the state, and the marketthe andthe state, al, 70
that they align with the multiple dimensions of dimensions multiple the with align they that
e central fields of HE policies. H policies. HE of fields central e - - makers. challenges level m in Hungary. Also, studying the the studying Also, Hungary. in m between access to more and more and more to access amework. In other words, how to to how words, other In amework.
on inve on
state and market forces market and state
that are not always in always not are that ? stment or in case of case in or stment The HungariancaseThe policy and political and policy he most convenient most he
o add to people Finally, . owever, - term
as as in in er er
CEU eTD Collection Questions Brief d youat any theprocesstime. stop can matter. that on thoughts your share could you if writing m S Political studying student master a am I Dear Students, onthe2011HungarianAssessing student higher opinions educationreforms Hungarian) Q the of Translation English 1. 2.
escription thereforms of financial thegiven requirementsprogram. of self with Students returned tothe state. Inrequirementafter graduation. fulfilled, costs isnot ofeducation case, it to need amount oftime as theirstate Stu theircontract enrollment.requirement of as Based onthestatuses, and full scholarships students with partial have a tosign student self scholarship The reforms introducedhigher state within education:full threetypes ofstatus dropped wasfrom and in2012. abolished legislation quota In onstate 2011,quota ugra hge euain ytm Hw nomd o o fe aot the about feel you within do changes informed significant How reforms? Mark one. only system. introduced education reforms higher education Hungarian higher 2011 The apply. in? enrolled currently you are program education higher Which y reforms 2011 higherI education Hungarywouldbe and thesisaboutthe in grateful
dent engage contract studentsto the samefor requires inemploymentHungary - o o o o financing statuses (no state funding)financing statuses(no
master program bachelor program vo other: cational training and education
(100% state
the reforms informed about Ifeelabsolutely - financing statushave a tosign qualificationthe contract including
-
funded placeswasThefunded measureeventually decreased. was -
ue funding), partial statefunding), (50% scholarship state
stionnaire - funded studies lasted. 20 years 20 lasted. studies the funded aretofulfill provided
Thank youyourThank contribution. for 1
A 2
PPENDIX cience at the Central European University. I am am I University. European Central the at cience 3
oiial, h qetonie a witn in written was questionnaire the (originally,
I
. 4
Filling out the questionnaire is anonym, and and anonym, is questionnaire the out Filling
5 the reforms uninformed about Ifeelabsolutely
- funding), and
Check all that that all Check
be CEU eTD Collection
needed qualityimproving institutional assessment is Kálmánimproved 2.0,2012) (Széll Plan higher be should educationpolicyand learning foreign lang 2012) ordropin time out(Széll Kálmán 2.0, Plan many inhigher people educationdonotfinish 2011) the country Plan Kálmán (Széll from the perspective labor ofthe market,leave m Kálmán 2011) Plan integration thelabor into market” (Széll not competitive and thatdonothelptheir university students whoreceive thatare degrees college“much money and isspent on economy Kálmán (Széll 2011) Plan funding thatdonot there maintained are institutions by state labor Kálmán market” (Széll 2011) Plan higher education systemand theneeds of “therecomplete isamismatch between the a 3. nyacquire a studentwhocompetitive degree
one only Mark reforms. each in option the of introduction the of justification the explaining Please
evaluate
serve theneeds of the uages is a is uages key field of
line.
h floig esn tkn rm oenet communication government from taken reasons following the
II
agree I donot
agree I partly
Iagree
know I donot
CEU eTD Collection length of their state employment as the in Hungarian amount oftime student contract (same current of version abolishment ofquota funded studies)
law studies less state fundingprograms for economics and natural science programs IT,more stateengineering, funding for and of 1,5times theoriginalwithin length education scholarship return ofthe to 50% cost of with partialrequirement orfull students for abolishment ofquota decreasing education access higher to of thoseprograms financing the financialconditions status,setting qualificationstud contract for studies asthe lengthof thestudies Hungarian employment afterstate contractamount oftime thesame for setting the currently ofthe version student valid studies after twice asHungarian for employment muchtime the first version contract the of student setting 5. 4.
state their int Please, on participation in in participation on higher education? long the about think you do What
-
in case program is not completed not is in caseprogram funded studies asfunded thelengthof the studies
evaluate evaluate spent roduction. Mark only one optioneach one only in line. roduction.Mark
-
higher apply for people will more education h floig oiy esrs ae o hw utfe yu find you justified how on based measures policy following the
ents self with
-
funded
education for higher applywill less people
- - term ef term III
justified is it think I donot
measures because these of application change in there be will no fects of the following policy measures policy following the of fects
justified is it think casesI In some
modifications various because the of to assess isdifficult it justified is I it think
know I donot
know not I do
CEU eTD Collection
------8. student loan opportuni points admission in the curriculum andproportion oftheoreticalpractical training internship opportunities quality ofeducation inthe selected institution application system rangeavai of competitiveness oftheHungarian degree mobility opportunities scholarship and other cost ofparticipation information, communication transparency education system ofhigher accessconditions of 7. 6.
Hungarian Hungarian higher educationsystem.each line. in Mark option one only Please, o o o o the numberand Mark peopleabroad? of studying option. one only relation the about think you do What education system Hungary in (optional). Please
I donotknow there thedemand a be for will nochange in studying there demandfor be studyingabroad will lower there be will ,
evaluate feel free to share any any share to free feel lable programs
higher demand for studyingabroadhigher demand
o mc yu r stsid ih h olwn eeet o the of elements following the with satisfied are you much how ties
------
further
IV
between the conditions of student contract student of conditions the between
dissatisfied absolutely Ifeel
huhs ikd h cret higher current the linked thoughts
broad 1
2
3
4
5 satisfied absolutely Ifeel
know I donot
CEU eTD Collection Csáki, György.“IMF Casani, Fernando, Daniela DeCarlosGarcia Filippo, Bojár, Gábor.“A rö Berry, Craig. Beck Baráth,IntézményiGyörgyi. and Tibor “Az Cseh, Autonómia Feltételrendszere: és Szervezeti Krónikája.”“Az OFÉSZ ( revolt Archibald, B.,andFeldman R. László.Andor, “Felsőoktatás Tükrében.” az“EUROPA 2020” ( Andor, György. Modelljéhez.” “MegjegyzésekTervezett Finanszírozásának a Felsőoktatás Budget.” State on “Analysis LizAltbach, Reisberg,Laura Philip, and Rumbley.
,
.” László, Nagy Bíró Pénzügyi Szemle 6806 May 4,2014. Spanish University S versus Private Assessment Performance; Universities: ofResearch Case ofthe Study http://www.if.org.uk/wp o Report Alapítvány,Központja 2011 Andrea,and képlet. Explanations about the Decreasing NépszerűségvesztésénekKözötti NapirendiMagyarázatai” Politikai ( http://epa.oszk.hu/00 Pedagógiai Szemle I.Jellemzők Jogi ( http://www.hallgatoimozgalom.hu/posts/2 the EUROPA 2020 Tudományos F ( funkcio/Elemzes_az_allamhaztartasrol_201302.pdf. 2014. http://www.mnb.hu/Root/Dokumentumtar/MNB/A_jegybank/kt London: Macmillan Palgrave 19962008/csakigy http://www.asz.hu/penzugyi
The Journal of Higher Education. The Journal ofHigher “ Notes for the Proposed Model of theNotes Higher Proposed for - “ 475e The Rise Rise The A 2010 n behalf of t - 9673
ghöz kötésésghöz atandíj.” Tardos RóbertTardos
http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/1/48.full.pdf+html?sid=e4740a0e - - hitelek Magyarországnak, 1996 üzetek es of Gerontocracy? Addressing Intergenerational the Democratic Deficit -
1, bf88f0b96a1f. , András, and Választások MagyarországonVálasztások - “ “ . 2013
” Framework and Legal Aspects of Institutional ofAutonomyLegalFramework and Aspects
Chronicle of OFÉSZ Chronicle of (2013): he Intergenerationalhe Foundation, No. 9. (2007): No. ) 000/00035/00116/2007 ystem.” Report 6, no. 3(2011a): 6, no. Gazdálkodás , D.H. “StateEducationSpending andthe Higher Tax - - content/uploads/2012/04/IF_Democratic_Deficit_final.pdf. 1.pdf. , 193
94 - . Hungarian National Bank, February,20 Bank, National Hungarian . . szemle
, 2012. Research Evaluation
- Róna Dániel. “Szabadesésben: Az MSZP 2006 “Szabadesésben:Dániel. MSZP Róna Az
108. Accessed12 April
- 216.
R
3 77 Popularity of MSZP betweenMSZP 2010 2006and Popularity of 55, -
HVG - EFERENCE cikkek/2013/imf 30. , Budapest: DemokráciaMa Budapest: Kutatások
233
no. no. 4 ” Accessed AprilAccessed 23,2014.
) 35 -
- Education Funding Education 5 (2011b): az 2014. Accessed April 23, 242. V The Globalization ofHigherThe Globalization Education - ,
09
- (2006): -
no. 11(1762) (2013): ofesz Zorita, andZorita, Elias Sanz - 2008.” (
-
2011 ta L -
23, no.1(2014): 48 Tobbek
- IST 2012.
kronikaj , - 618
452 hitelek edited by Enyedi Zsolt, Szabó Szabó edited by Zsolt, Enyedi , 2014.
“ “ IMFLoans for Hungar –
Higher Education in Light Educationin Higher of - Accessed 23, April 2014. 644. 455. - Intezmenyi.html a. -
magyarorszagnak ”
)
Köz
80 - - Casado. “Public “ gazdaság: 13. Accessed May 4, 4, MayAccessed 13. - Free fall: Political Free - - 81. 61. Accessed 61.
gyar .
”)
–
2010 - y Új ” ”
) )
I . n . ”
Új
- CEU eTD Collection European Co Boer,Enders, H.F.De J., and Weyer, E. “ “ Doyle, W DavidDill, D.(2007). “Diáktüntetések 1995 D D Cseke,a Sötétbe: Hajnalka. Átláthatatlan“Ugrás Felsőoktatás Átalakítása.” a ( Felsőoktatási Ténytár. Felsőoktatás “A Költségvetési Támogatása.”Higher (“Database of European “Communication from the Commission:The Commission. of Role theUniversities in Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators OECD EducationGlance at2013: a e Wit, Hanse Tony.Higher and in Wit, Adams, Competition “Global R. elaney, A.,and W. Doyle, J. https://sites.google.com/site/felsooktatastenytar/koltsegvetes/koltsegvetes Education: ofHigher Funding Accessed State 1. Education”) 2014. June conte 3,2014.http://eurthe EuropeKnowledge”June 2003/0058.Accessed of lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do 2013. Higher EducationS GrowthRegions: Supporting and Jobs theEuropeanCouncil, and Economic and Social Committee theCommi M of Higher EducationRe http://www.oecd http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11162 Education http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/docs/Encyclopedia_Final.pdf Baker, and i 2012ben.html. http://www.origo.hu/itthon/20121216 and in2012”)Ák Albert, 2010 ValPortnoi, andSylvia D.Rust, Bagley, S. Education, Policy, andtheG Study Policies, Rationales, andIn and of Practices Europe.” inAustralia VASterling, :Stylus Publishing Postsecondary Research Education 2007 (2011): LackDark: theHigher ofTransparencywithin Reforms Education n
ay, 2014.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10734 illiam R. R. illiam International En nt/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52003DC0058. .
m http://eur
mission. “Communication frommission. the Commission tothe European Parliament, the 16
-
51 17. P. Peterson.P. “Does Merit , no. -
ben, 2006 ben, - “ Quality inHigher Assurance - ilibrary.org/education/educa 5 (2010) cyclopedia ystems.”Last October 20,2011.Accessed September modified 7,
- Accessed 20May, 2014. - visited.” based Aid “Crowd Out”“Crowd based Need Aid?” Aid Based - os. ban és 2012 “The of EducationinS Role Higher : 397 Origo lobal Competition Phenomenon Competition lobal
of Education, 3rd Edition, 2010, of Education,3rdEdition, – ,
415. 2007. Higher education Higher education Regulatory AutonomyandRegulatory Performance: The . Last. 2012.Accessed2014. April 22, modified:
- - Accessed MayAccessed 10,2014. diaktuntetesek ben.” (“Student Demonstrations in 1995,2006, (“Student in Demonstrations ben.” –
.” .”
an A , edited by, ?uri=COM:2011:0567:FIN:EN:PDF OECD Publishing VI 219
ge tion Education: Practices and Issues” PracticesandEducation:
- nda for theM 233. - at - 65, 1(2013): 5 010 D. E. Hellera D. E. - -
a NewMacmillan, York: Palgrave 1995ben - glance
- 9166 Education: AComparative
. Accessed October 7,2013. 2010 odernisation of Europe'sodernisation - - tate Budgets.” Intate Budgets.” - 2013_eag 3. 2006ban - edited byMcGraw,B. E. 012
nd , edited by Laura, edited by M. ” – ) -
9578 ResearchHigh in Figyelő Figyelő K. M. Sh K. M. 23. Accessed 20 - lex.europa.eu/legal - “ - idosorosan. tte - Jump to t to Jump es Higher Higher 2013 - e 4. -
of the
55, no.49 . - . aw
en. To appear To State Reform , he
55
– 76. er
- CEU eTD Collection Kenesei István. “A Felsőoktatás Leszázalékolása.”KeneseiIstván. “A ( Felsőoktatás Keczer, Finanszírozása“A Gabriella.Felsőoktatás és Teljesítménye a Közép Zoltán. “LevetettJandó, Láncok Insights Harsányi, “ANemzetközi Szilvia. and Magyar Vincze, Felsőoktatás GergelyNéhány Jellemzője Gürüz, K. Goodman, Beenen,Learning Paul S., G.“Organizational and ContractsManagement Ferenc.Glatz, és “Akadémia Tudománypolitika LiorGideon, Fleck, Zoltán., Gadó, Gábor. Fejér, Tamá Gibb, Allan, Gay Haskins, and IanGibb, Allan,Gay and “Leading Haskins, the Entrepreneurial Roberston. University: Meeting Évek “Felvi.hu. (2001/Á Elmúlt Statisztikái New York, 2013. 2013, the Entrepreneurial Devel Accessed 1.http://www.felvi.hu/felveteli/ponthat June no. 39(1687) (2011). States Államokban.” ( Failure http://www.oecd.org/insights/humancapitalhowwhatyouknowshapesyourlife.htm. Accessed April 29,2014. Perspective Tükörben.” ( Economy Education.” 04.pdf. Tudomány ( http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978 Sprin to Professor Kis.Accessed 4May János 2014. of Hungary. Körtvélyesi, Majtényi, Zsolt., A. Tóth,Gábor Balázs., Humánpolitikai S “ - Academy and Knowledge Politics in Academy Politics and Knowledge -
OECD Publication. vc Higher Education and International Student andInternational Higher Education inthe Mobility GlobalKnowledge
editedAltmann and by BerndAndreas Ebersberger,9 s. “Merre Tovább Felsőoktatás?” ( Felsőoktatás?” Tovább s. “Merre - ger New 2012. York,
english ” ( ed.
) of Contract Force theBinding Student ofthe Közép . Albany: Sta )
. 4 ”) Handbook of Survey Methodology fortheSocial ofSurveySciencesMethodology Handbook
Academy of Management Education Academy and of Learning 2011. Edited by Andrew Arato Professor “A Few (2002) -
final.pdf Pénzügyi szemle -
“ Európai közlemények Higher EducationHigher Fund zemle : 494 , Halmai,Gábor., Hegyi, Szabolcs., Juhász, Gábor., , Halmai,Gábor., Hegyi,Kis, János., Juhász, Szabolcs., Aspects of Hungarian Higher Education from an InternationalAspects Education from ofHungarian Higher an
te UniversityPress, NewYork 2008. te of . “Human How Capital: W
opment Needs Education.”In ofHigher 5 (2011): - – 506. Accessed2014. http://www.matud.iif.hu/2002 10May,
Accessed 10 May, 2014. Hatástala
57, no.2(2012):
34 - n a Röghöz Kötés.” (“ChainsLeftn a are Röghöz B - 41.
- 5, (3 1 2014/K. )”PreviousYears”) (“Statistics from 2014. - “ Post 4614 ing andPerformance E inCentral
Higher Education:Where toGo? a Volt Szocialista OrszágokbanVolt Szocialista a - 4) VII - http://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/amicus Soviet Countries, 1922 “ -
3876 no. 18 Downsizing Higher Education Downsizing
hat YouKnow ShapesLife.” Your 226 - 2. - arok_rangsorok/elmult_evek. - ” 19 (2012): 245.
) , Professor Halmai, Gábor Opinion on the Fundamental Law Law Opinion onthe Fundamental Figyelő Figyelő
- 45. New York, NY:York, Springer45. New
57, no.43(2013):
7, no.4(2008): 521 Universities in Change inChange Universities 7 5 - 94. - 1999 - . európai
New NY: York, , 1922 .” ” uropean ) )
”) Magyar ehind:
HVG HVG - 1999.”
34 - 2007. 534. - 33, 35. -
-
CEU eTD Collection Molesworth, Mike Ministry EducationinHungary: ofEducation.“Higher Millennium.” forHeading theThird McLendon, ItsMasseen, A. “Higher EducationResearch:HourglassImplications.” Peter and Structure The AreMark,Are Eddie.“Students Consumers.” NotProducts. They Makki, Marie London “ Communiqé. Council. LisbonEuropean Le Milka. and Nicky Metso, Feuvre, Ladányi,“A Magyar Andor. Felsőoktatás( Európában.” Helye and Altbach, P.“TheKnight, J. Internationalization of Higher Education: StatisztikaiKözponti Hivatal. “A 15
Educ http://www.nefmi.gov.hu/letolt/english/highereducation2_1.pdf B http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jhe/summary/v080/80.6.mclendon.html. Education ofRole Factors Political Higher inState EducationFunding Sadlak, 59 Teichlerand J. In 3 közéletiországos hetilap Ügye.” ( Communique Accessed 14 r1.en0.htm 2014. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100 _State_and_Higher_Education.pdf. http://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/ComparativeReports/Comparative_Report Report and ResearchInterdisciplinarity Sectors on inEi ImpactHumanities: The of theRelationshipbetween Education theStateHigher and the Education inEurope Accessedhttp://jsi.sagepub.com/content/11/3 10 May, 2014. Realities http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_hosszu/mpal9807_01_03a.html. Accessed April,[/thousand”) 2014. 10 fő].”[ezer (“Population ofthe 15 u (2013): Higher Education Research: Its Relationship to Policy and Practice and Policy to Relationship Its Research: Education Higher d a M. K., Hearn, J. C.,andMokher, C.G J. M. K.,Hearn, ation andtheStudentConsumeration as p - e . Rose. “17 ezer Hoffman“17 Rose.
s Université t “ .”
, 17000 Hoffman Orphan17000 Hoffman 489
2
80 Journal ofS . 0 , Scullion, Richard, Scullion, 0 May, 2014. http://www.eqar.eu/fileadmin/documents/bologna/LondonMay, 2014.
- - no. 6(2009) 2 493. 18May2007.pdf. . Towards theTowards EducationArea. European Higher
A c
de Toulouse
“Presidency Conclusions 23 and 24 March 2000.” Accessed 10, April, 10, Accessed 2000.” March 24 and 23 Conclusions “Presidency c ” e ) s s Statisztikai sze Statisztikai tudies in International Education tudies inInternational e
d 16, no.30(2012): -
: 686 70. Oxf J u – n “ 74 éves népesség számakorcsoportokés népesség 74 éves nemek szerint e . Disciplinary SciencesBarriersand between theSocial
, - – -
1 Le 2005.Accessed 2014. Mirail, France, 10May, árva: and 713. - , s
74 years74 olds ord: 2000. Pergamon, 2 : Quota and Contract Conditions in Cross in : Quotaand Conditions Contract
0 Nixon, Elizabeth(eds). Nixon,
1 Accessed 10 January,Accessed 10 201 mle Kereszttűzben a KeretszáKereszttűzben 4 . . Taylor&e Francis
90 VIII . “Partisans, and Professionals,
14 ,
no. 5(2012): -
15. Based on Age Cohorts and Gender onAgeBased and Cohorts ght European Countries.
“
The Place of Hungarian PlaceHigherThe of
11, no.3
College Stu College 447 .” - The Marketisation ofHigher The Marketisation - Library, 4/290.
The Journal of ” London, 18 ” - mok és a Röghöz Kötés és aRöghöz mok 4. . 453.
– andMotivations 4
(2007): 290 (2007):
2010. dent Journal
2000 ” Comparative Power: The
- May 2007. , edited by U.byedited , fire
Higher ” – ) 305. Hetek:
-
47 -
no.
CEU eTD Collection Po István.Polónyi, a “Keresztúton Hazai Felsőoktatás.” ( Ostrom, E. “TheInstitutional P. Olsen, Johan Dynamics (European) ofthe University.” Ness, Erik Nárai, Szervezetek “A Szerepe Márta. Civil Illetve Egyének, ésaz Jelentőségük Közösségek, a “National ofHungary.Kálmánthe Széll Reform Plan.” ( Based Program on “National Higher Education.” Systems: Eurypedia. Education European Encyclopedia on Naidoo, Avian Rajani,Shankar, Christin Musselin, Polónyi, István.Polónyi, tartaléka.”felsőoktatás “A ( “Oktatási ( Adatok 2012/2013.” lónyi, István.lónyi, “Vélemény: Felsőoktatás ésTudománypolitika.”
and Knowledge Politics Crossroad (1730) (2012): by Sabatier, P. 21 publications/workingpapers/working 2014. http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena Centreno. 15March, University May forOslo, 2005.Accessed 20, European Studies, of http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/oktat/oktatas1213.pdf. Tükör Statisztikai The Journal ofHigherEducation ProjectEducation: Differs General Funding HowCapital from Appropriations Fund and forCommunities the Society”) Társadalom Számára.” http://www.kormany.hu/download/0/c3/30000/Nemzeti%20Reform%20Program.pdf. Nemzeti Reform Program =hu. _%25C3%25A9s_szakpolitikai_fejlem%25C3%25A9nyek+&cd=1&hl=hu&ct=clnk&gl 3DMagyarorsz%25C3%25A1g:Folyamatban_l%25C3%25A9v%25C5%2591_reformok te.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/ind http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:vuRVQAAgEnwJ:https://webga National Accessed Education 4.2014. Systems. May http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0267257X.2011.609135#.U4n4mPl_vC8 (2011): Policy Aspirations and Outcomes.” Design Implementation and
C. andC. Tandber “Institutional Rational Choice
1142 ”) e and Teixeria,N. (eds Pedro
Felsőoktatási M Felsőoktatási – 1162.
80 - - 7, no. 32 64. 81. g, David A
Accessed 13May, 2014.
Boulder, Press Westview CO:
(“The Role of Civil Organizations for Individuals,(“The ofOrganizations for Role Civil for ” ) d Veer, Ekant. “ “ ja. A Széll Kálmánja. A Alapján”) Széll Terv Data on Education 2012/20 onEducation Data Educatio
(2013) . Volume 41. New York: Springer . Volume41.New York: űhely . “The ofState Spending onHigher. Determinants
84, no.3 .” : 1
no. 1(2011):
Educatio
Journal of Marketing ManagementJournal ofMarketing I. (2009 In - - “ papers2005/wp05_15.pdf. 5. Accessed 10April,5. Accessed 2014. Reserve Education ofHigher Theories ofPolicy Theories . ) The ConsumeristTurninHigherThe Education: ex.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Pdfprint%26page%
Reforming Higher Education:
(2013): (2013): IX ):
4 (200
85
“ National HigherNational at Education a
29 - 102. - 329 4 42. , 2007. ): 13
- 616 357. ” )
P ( Központi Statisztikai Hivatal Statisztikai Központi - “ rocess 634.
Opinion: Higher EducationOpinion:
Accessed 4 April 4 Accessed , 2014.
2nd 2nd ” “
) Working Paper - M HVG ed. 2007 27, no.11 agyarország
Public Policy
34, no.30 ,
, edited 2014. – 12 .” .
. :
CEU eTD Collection Tight, Malcom.Tight, KálmánLépés.”“Széll 2.0.A Kálmán Plan Következő 2.0:The Plan Next (“Széll Step”) Kálmán“Széll Terv: AdósságKálmán az Forces Összefogás Ellen.”(“Széll Joining Plan: Máté.Szabó, 199 Stensaker, B.“Quality F as Setényi, “Felsőoktatás János. Schumpeter, Joseph. Schneider,IsL.and Sidney,“What A. Policy Next M.for andSocial Design “DominantSaarinen, Approaches andUrsin, Emerging intheStudyHigher T.,and J. of M. Rizzo, J. Rappai,“A Gábor. Bologna “Project Report:
Education & University Open Press, 200 A_k%C3%B6vetkez%C5%91_l%C3%A9p%C3%A9s%20(SzKT%2020).pdf. http://www.kormany.hu/download/3/e8/80000/1 Government Hungary of 1n%20Terv.pdf. http://www.kormany.hu/download/4/d1/20000/Sz%C3%A9ll%20K%C3%A1lm%C3%A Against Debt”) http://www.amielandmelburn.org.uk/collections/soundings/09_122.pdf. Accessed 4May 2024. 2007. 2007 Vol.20 Education.”.In Theory?” http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2010.538472#.U4n6Yvl_vC8. Accessed 10 May, 2014. Education Policy Change.” 2007. 2007 2001.” Szemle Statisztikai ( http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/OFFDOC_BP_trend_I.1068715136182.pdf. (CRE) European Conf UnionRectors‟ “ Challenges Bologna ofthe , edited by G.Ehrenberg, R. “
State Preferences APanelfor EducationSpending: Data Higher Analysis, . June 7,1999.Accessed. June 4,2014. April
In Researching HigherEducation
Trends Pol What’s Happening to Pu What’s to Happening 8. “New Social MovementsHungary.” in , editedMuller, by and Maassen Peter Johan icy Studies Journal icy Studies Capitalism, Socialism, andDemocracyCapitalism, The Government of Hungary of The Government inHigherEducation Quality Assurance
in Learning inHigherin Structures Education . 83,no.6 ashion.Idea ExploringtheTranslation of a Management Higher into - folyamat Kihívásai a Statisztika FelsőfokúStatisztika Oktatásafolyamat a Számára Kihívásai - politika.” (“Higher Educationpolitika.” (“Higher Policy”) , 201 , Studies inHigher Education -
(2005): process for Teaching Statistics inHigher Education Statistics process for Teaching 2. Accessed2014. 4April erencesAssociation andofEuropean the Universities
37 3 blic HigherFinancial Education? The Shifting Burden –
35 no. 1(2009: 103
514 . Baltimore, MD: Johns HopkinsUniversity MD:Johns Baltimore, . Glasgow: The Society forHigher into Research 3. - 532.
X , 2011. Accessed April, 2011. 4,2014.
- Soundings . New York:. New & Harper 1942. Row, - 119. .
37, no.2(2012): 143 Higher Education 99
.” - 118. Springer Netherlands,118. Springer Educatio
Confederation of 9 (1998): 122 9 (1998):
Construction
1, (1994): 36
Dynamics – – 131.
156.
” 1977
) The .” .”
Press, - 49. –
CEU eTD Collection 248/2012. (VIII.31) GovernmentCCIV. enactment 2011Act onimplementing of Magyar 32/2012. (VII/4)decision Court of onlegislation 2011Act Constitutional ofCCIV. Magyar 2/2012. (I.20) enactment Government onstate scho 1007/2012. (I.20)decision onquotainhigher Government Magyar education Közlöny. in2012. 1276/2010. (XII.8) Gov LXX2013 Act 2011Act of ofCCIVonthe4 modifying based 4 2011 Acthigher onnational education.Magyar ofCCIV Közlöny. 2011/165. higher2005 Act educ ofCXXXIX on LXXX1993 Act of onh Legal documents “ Zgaga, Pavel. Educationand “Higher Citizenship: andM. Ronca,Weerts, D.J., J. Veres,“A Devizahitel Zoltán. Tudományos “Kakas”. Dissertation. DiákKör 2011 th
Amendment of the
. É Közlöny. 2012/85. 2012/6. in 2011.Magyar Közlöny. 2010/185. Law. Magyar Közlöny. 2013/86. http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/a1300325.htm/a1300325.htm. http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/t0500139.htm/t0500139.htm. http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/t9300080.htm/t9300080.htm. http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/nepsz2011/nepsz_orsz_2011.pdf. Accessed 20 May, 2014. Educational Research Journal of HigherEducation A Comparative StudyState AppropriationsIResearch of for universities Ae Consequences State SupportProvidedfor ofthe People with Mortgages Társadalmi, Következményei.” ( Gazdasági Participation”) Hungarian the Aspects Behavior Democracy ofPolitical from and Political Magatartás és Politikai Részvétel Aspektusából Közlöny. 2012/115. v quum Salutare i
N e ́ p
s z a
́ m l a
́ FundamentalLaw. May Accessed 5, l Pécs, 2010. a ernment decision onnumber ofstate ́ s igher education. May Accessed igher 5
8 .” ( , no.3
“ 77 2011. National Census 2011. National - adósoknak Nyújtott Állami Mentőöv Lényegesadósoknak ÁllamiMentőöv Nyújtott Elemei ésEgyes , no.6(200
“Examining Differences Higher Supportfor inState – 4
(2012): ation. Accessed Mayation. Accessed 5,
8, no.2
6):
195
935 azÚjMagyar DemokráciábanA Fiatalok a (2009): 1 – 211. –
The Full RangeThe Full ofPurposes 967. XI “ l arship. Magyar Közlöny.2012/6. Elements and Social and Elements Economic ”
)
. (“Study of Young People in the New. (“Study ofYoung People K
- ö 18. , z
p 2014.
2014. o -
funded places in higher educationfunded places
n 2014. t th i
S amendment oftheFundamental t a t
i
s z t i k a i
H
i .” v ” a .”
) European t a Iustum Iustum
The l
. 2013.
Education: Education:
Journal
CEU eTD Collection 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Internet sources from footnotes 1668/2012. (
“ “Vocationa published byEducationDirectorate atandcovers and GlancetheOECD is forSkills Education “Europe LXXX1993 Act ofhigh on Krónikája.”“Az OFÉSZ ( “Eurydice “Kormányzat “Kormányzat Building the European Building The and act 28February inforce 1993 betweenbecause was 1September 2006 itwas L As “Europe 2020 “ European CORDIS Commission : Accessed Programmes.” 5, May
by et auCNRS."SHS inSociologie Connaissance. edited Approches Nouvelles Cognitives, Institutionnel"PilotageLe et Argumentation: du Développement cas duDépartement http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. http://cordis.europa.eu/programme/rcn/843_en.html. area.aspx http://www.eua.be/eua Accessed May 4, Luxembourg:Vocational Office Training. Publications Europ ofthe for the2008 http://www.iom.int/cms/en/sites/iom/home/where Accessed May 10, “Eurydice eroforrasok Human Resources, News http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/t9300080.htm/t9300080.htm http://www.hallgatoimozgalom.hu/posts/2 Accessed May 10, eroforrasok Human Re 2012/176. repealedCXXXIX by 2005Acteducation. ofonhigher e (2005,6)and Feuvreexplain Metso Anni Borzeix, A Bouvier, and P Pharo. Paris: Editions duCNRS. Editions and Pharo. Paris: P Anni Borzeix,ABouvier, -
Internation - XII.21) Government Magyar decision ontherenewal education. Közlöny. ofhigher l Education and Training inHungary.” Development Europeanl Education Centrethe for of
Eurypedia - - .
Erőforrások Emberi Minisztériuma
– Emberi Erőforrások Emberi Minisztériuma - sourc - -
Europe‟s Growth StrategyEurope‟s - Eurypedia miniszte miniszteriuma/hirek/a 2011 period. al Organization es, News
- 2014.
Higher EducationArea. 2014. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/eurypedia_en.php.2014. 2014. Descriptions ofNationalEducationDescriptions SystemsPolicies, and “ riuma/hirek/a Chronicles of th Chronicles of er education. Accessed - - work
http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/4103_en.pdf DescriptionsEducation ofNational Systems andPoli ” ” http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/eurypedia_en.php.
) Accessed May 10. 2014. http://www.kormany.hu/hu/emberi) Accessed 10.2014. May ). Accessed 10, May (Hungarian titles are(Hungarian translated) - and for Accessed Migration.” May 11, - policy - - hallgatoi hallgatoi e OFÉSZ , - t
he term Paradeise. comes (1998). from Catherine - Europ area/building - ” az XII
- - Accessed May 4 osztondij osztondij - April 23, -
ofesz -
ean Accessed Commission.” 4, May
” Hírek.” ( 2014. 2014. Hírek.” ( ) Accessed 23, April - we - kronikaja.
- http://www.kormany.hu/hu/emberi - - - work/europa.html szerzodes szerzodes
the 2014.
“ “ Government, Ministry of Government, Government, Ministry of Government, - european
,
2014. 2014.
2014. 2014. - - nem nem
2014. 2014. - ean Union, 2011. Union, ean
higher
2014. - - roghoz roghoz .
- education
. - - EACEA.” cies.
kotes kotes ”
. 2014. and -
- -
CEU eTD Collection Veres,“A Devizahitel Zoltán. 25 24 23. Magyaravailable onlineat Közlöny is 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 “Kormányzati Intézkedések“KormányzatiLakáshitelesek a (fris Érdekében “2013. Évi LXV“2013. Évi
See thereference theexact „Internet pages within in list section: sources‟ “A Magyar Államról “Eu.kormany.hu.”Accessed for stands MSZP Magyar Párt (Hungarian Szocialista Party). Socialist The fullname of th “ IskolaiLegmagasabb Befejezett“ Ráta Foglalkoztatási 2011.” ésSzerint, Nemek Végzettség Early school leaverscover 18 “Diplomán Túl Intézet: “Oktatáskutató Érettségi.” ésKétszintű ( Fejlesztő In post Hungarian case, the Esélyegyenlőséga Évfolyamokon. Nyelvi Előkészítő intezkedesek Kormányzat.Accessed 12,2014.http://www.kormany.hu/hu/gyik/kormanyzati April Consequences State SupportProvided for ofthe People with Mor Társa http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/t1300068.htm/t1300068.ht Law http://www.kozlonyok.hu/nkonline/index.php?menuindex=0300&pageindex=0300. tortenete. KereszténydAlliance)and Civic Accessed April 29, Fejlesztő Intézet April 29 ( Oktatási Adatok, 2012 attainment orwithoutany con never attainment and tertiary higher education, for thisreason,covers programs for thatgive tertiaryeducation http://www.felvi.hu/diploman_tul/munkaadoknak/szolgaltatas_cikk_bolognai. SystemBologna andth http://www.ofi.hu/tudastar/erettsegi. TheEducational New Final Development: Aequum “ Employment Rate Based onEducationalandEmployment RateBased Gender, 2011 Attainment ”) dalmi, Gazdasági Következményei.dalmi, Gazdasági
Accessed 29, April - level degree.level
, Salut
2 III. Törvény.” Accessed 11, May - 014. http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xtabla/munkerohelyz/tablmh11_08.html. a -
- A BolognaiÉsÚjSz Rendszer Az lakashitelesek are e parties are Fidesz aree Fidesz parties . :
( 8, no.3 Az Alaptörvény.”Az ( “
Equal OpportunityLanguage at PreparatoEqual the 2014. http://www.ofi.hu/tudastar/fehervari2014.
- - - e Newe Majors adósoknak Nyújtott Állami Mentőöv Lényegesadósoknak ÁllamiMentőöv Nyújtott Elemei ésEgyes 2013, 2) 2013, secondaryeducation covers and vocation tertiary education Ap - – 24 year who24 oldpeople leave educationwithalowlevel the of 4 2014. http://www.kormany.hu/hu/mo/az - ril 29,
erdekeben. (2012): .
emokrata Néppárt (Christian Democratic People‟s Party). People‟s Democratic (Christian Néppárt emokrata
2014. http://eu.kormany.hu/a –
195 Magyar (Fidesz Polgári Szövetség “ ” About the HungarianAbout State ). Accessed April 7,
– ” ( 211.
XIII
Examination 2014. “ Elements and Social and Elements Economic
akok.” ( ” Fehérvári, Anikó. tinue their studies(StatisztikaiTükör: sített sített “ Insitution of Education and “ ” Beyond theDegree: The ). AccessedApril 7, m.
2014. -
2012.06.25.).” 2014. - aniko. - magyar ry Programs tgages -
- The Fund alaptorveny
Oktatáskutató és - - ” eu
” ) Hungarian ). Accessed). Iustum Iustum - tagsag
amental ” 2014.
).
- - al
CEU eTD Collection 38 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 37
“Kihirdették a 1 Tandíjakat: K “Az OFÉSZ “OrbánVikto “HungaryAway ReformsDrift Democracy From Constitutional Signal ofNetwork Student Mission (Hal Az“Egyre Tiltakozik ÚjFelsőoktatási TöbbEgyetemista Törvény ( Ellen.” See more: “Kié ( Egyetem?” Az All policies included cover inthe discussion period heldApril the before in elections thenext “Az Államháztartás Hiánya ( “National Election “V “The New Fundamental Law of Hu ofLaw Fundamental New “The http://www.valasztas.hu/en/ovi/287/287_0.html. isszadobta a isszadobta 27, are to1000000HUFfor thePopular Official:fromPrograms 150000 http://www.hallgatoimozgalom.hu/posts/2 2F. http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2012/12/15/Orban_Viktor_keretszamok_bejelentes_AMZH LegislationSystem from beAbolished will UL. http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2012/7/3/Alkotmanyellenes_a_hallgatoi_szerzodes_QBG2 Accessed April 20, ( constitutional Accessed April 20, http://hallgatoihalozat.blog.hu/tags/szakmai. ooktatas. http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2011/10/7/20111007_nyugat_magyar Accessed April 20, University ProtesttheNew Against Students EducationAct Higher http://eduline.hu/cimk http://eduline.hu/felsooktatas/2011/10/24/Kie_az_egyetem_D278H9. http://www.kormany.hu/en/news/the 15 http State 2002 Budget: keretszamok “ The Constitutional Court overruled Court ContractsTheGovernment Enactment Constitutional the onStudent , 2014.
2014. http://www.origo.hu/itthon/20120120 s://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/eurostat_tablak/tabl/teina200.html
r: Eltörlik ar: Eltörlik Fe rónikája.” ( z Alkotmánybíróság a Hallgatói Sz AlkotmánybíróságHallgatói a z - es -
reforms Office.” Accessed May 31, 2014. MayOffice.” Accessed 31, - az “ Who Owns theWho University? -
- onkoltseg 2014. 2014. 2 2014. 2013 014. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/hungary 014. “ e/fels%C5%91oktat%C3%A1si+t%C3%B6rv%C3%A9ny+201. - Chronicle o Chronicle signal 50ezer és Egymillió Között a50ezer S és Között Egymillió lvételi KeretszámokRendszerét - ”). AccessedApril 29, ) És Többlete (+) (2002 És Többlete (+) ) - es lgatói Hálózat). Accessed May 4, drift - ngary.” kepzes - f the OFÉSZ”). Accessedf the23, April away - new - Hungarian Government Hungarian arai.html - from - - fundamental XIV az ” )
- ” Eduline.hu - erződésekről Szóló Rendeletet.”erződésekrőlSzóló ofesz ) democracy
- 2014. Eduline.hu
felsooktatas . –
2013).” ( - kronikaja. - lágerszakokon.” ( law .” ( . Accessed April 20, - a . Accessed April. Accessed 20.2014. “ - “ - Viktor Orbán: The Quota of - 888064.html. Surplus andDeficit ofthe allamilag
-
2014. 2014. hungary. . Accessed April 12, April Accessed . .
” orszagi_egyetem_fels – ).
”) ”)
Spiegel Online.”
2014. Eduline.hu - “ finanszirozott Accessed April
More and More More “ Tutition Fees Tutition
2014. - Eduline.hu .
201 -
”) 4.
.