DOCSLIB.ORG

PREBENDARIES DEPRIVED UNDER QUEEN ELIZABETH Part I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ampleforth Journal 17:2 (1912) 205-219 PREBENDARIES DEPRIVED UNDER QUEEN ELIZABETH Part I John B. Wainewright O THE AMPLEFORTH JOURNAL FOR JULY 1911, the present writer contributed a paper entitled ‘Archdeacons deprived under Queen Elizabeth’. As several readers found it Tinteresting, he now proposes to follow it up by the present list, from which the names of Bishops, Deans, and Archdeacons, who held prebends or canonries with their other ecclesiastical promotions, have been omitted. WILLIAM ALLEN, M.A. Oxon 1554, Prebendary of York 1558 (?), Fellow of Oriel 1550, Principal of St. Mary’s Hall, Oxford 1556, if he as a layman had a prebend at York (which seems doubtful as his name does not occur in Le Neve), probably resigned it together with his office of Principal in 1559. He crossed to Flanders 1561, but returned in 1562. He again crossed the sea in 1565 in which year he was deprived of his Fellowship at Oriel. He was ordained priest at Cambrai in the same year. In 1568 he founded the English College at Douay which in 1578 was transferred to Rheims. He was Regius Professor of Divinity at Douay 1570, D.D. 1571, Canon of Cambrai about 1575, Cardinal Priest of the title of S. Martino 1587; Archbishop-nominate of Mechlin 1589. He died the i6th of October 1594. D.N.B. I, 314. Gillow I, 14. THOMAS ARDEN, Prebendary of York (Wighton) 1556, Worcester (14) 1558, and Hereford (Bartonsham) 1559, Rector of Hartlebury, Worcestershire, 1554, and Vicar of Southstock, Oxon, 1551, was deprived in 1560 or 1561. In S.P. Dom. Add. Eliz. XI, 45, and wherever he is mentioned by Strype he is called John Arden. It is uncertain whether he is the person of these names, who took his B.A. from Christ Church in 1536/7, and his M.A. in 1537 (Foster Alumni Oxon.), or the man, who according to Cooper (Ath. Cantab. I, 219) was elected from Eton to King’s College, Cambridge, in 1547, but left without taking a degree; probably the latter. He was very likely related to Edward Arden of Park Hall, Warwick, as to whom see D.N.B. II, 74. Gillow 1,57. He ‘lurked’ in Herefordshire with Archdeacon John Blaxton and others. WILLIAM ATKINS, M.A., Prebendary of Lincoln (South Scarle) from 1556 to 1560, may not improbably be the William Atkins of Sander’s list. He is possibly the William Adkins from Salgrave, Notts., who entered Winchester College in 1534, was Fellow of New College 1540 to 1546 where he became M.A., and Fellow of Winchester College 1546. He died still a Fellow in December 1561, and his brass may still be seen in the Cloisters there. N. & Q. 2nd S. II, 195. THOMAS BACON, B.D. Cantab, before 1557. If the heading of the document printed Rymer’s Foedera XV, 563, is to be taken as decisive, this person, who was Master of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, and Prebendary of Ely (6th 2 P R E B E N D A R I E S D E P R I V E D U N D E R E L I Z A B E T H Stall) and died the ist or 2nd of January 1558-9 was deprived of his prebend before his death. Cooper Ath. Cantab. I, 191. WILLIAM BARRETT, Prebendary of Hereford (Pratum Majus) 1542 to 1560, may possibly be identical with the person of this name who was incumbent of Longford, Norwich diocese 1556 to 1561, when he was succeeded after deprivation. If he is, he was probably deprived of his prebend at the same time. EDMUND BEDINGFELD, Prebendary of Exeter (St. Endellion) suffered deprivation and his successor was appointed in 1562. He was probably related to Sir Henry Beding-field as to whom, see D.N.B. IV, 133. The names of Humphrey and John Bedingfield occur as recusants in Strype Annals II, ii, 343, 676 ; III, ii, 422. ALEXANDER BELSIRE, B.D. Oxon, Prebendary (4th stall) of Christ Church, Oxford, 1546, and first President of St. John’s College, Rector of Handborough, Oxon, was deprived of the first two preferments in 1559, and Strype seems to imply in his additions to the list in S.P. Dom. Add. Eliz. XI, 45 (Ann. I, i, 411), that he was deprived of the Rectory as well. It appears however from Wood’s Annals I, 141, that he was Rector when he died on the i3th of July, 1567. He was a native of Yate, and entered Winchester College at the age of eleven in 1513. He ‘ was Fellow of New College from 1521 to 1541, and M.A. 1526-7 was Rector of Tingewick, Bucks, from 1540 to 1557. Willis’ Cathedrals III, 454, gives his epitaph. See D.N.B. XL, 136. RICHARD BERNARD, Prebendary of Wells (Eastharptree) 1551 who vacated his Prebend before 1564 may possibly be identified with Richard Bernard, M.A., Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford, and also with the Richard Bernard of Sander’s list, who is undoubtedly the Richard Bernard, D.D., who matriculated at the University of Douay in 1578, as to whom see the Ampleforth Journal for April 1911, at p. 293. JOHN BICKERDYKE, Prebendary of Ely (7th Stall) and, according to Sander, of Wells, was deprived of, or resigned the former preferment in 1559. He was probably also the Rector of Shipdam, Norfolk, about 1557, succeeded in 1561. LEONARD BILSON, M.A. Oxon 1546 (whom Gee pp. 285, 296 calls Lawrence and Dodd calls Richard). Prebendary of Winchester (compare Strype Mem. II, ii, 265), Salisbury (Kingsteignton) 1552, and Wells, and Rector of Kingsworthy Hants, 1558, was deprived of all four F 2 preferments early in Elizabeth’s reign. He had been headmaster of Reading School in 1546. He was uncle to Thomas Bilson afterwards Protestant Bishop of Winchester (Strype Whitgift II, 350). On the 141)1 June, 1862, he had already been a long time in the Tower (Cath. Reo. Soc. I, 56. He was still there in April 1570 (S.P. Dom. Eliz. LXVII, 93) and was removed thence to the Marshalsea by order of the Privy Council the I4th of October 1571 where he still remained in July 1580 (C.R.S. 1, 60, 70). In 1579 he was aged about fifty. (Strype Ann. II, ii, 660.) He was discharged from the Marshalsea between June 1582 and March 1582/3 (C.R.S. II, 231). P R E B E N D A R I E S D E P R I V E D U N D E R E L I Z A B E T H 3 BARTHOLOMEW BLITHMAN, M.A. Oxon (Supp. 1560), Prebendary of Wells (Dinder), and Rector of Cossington, Somersetshire, was deprived in 1560. Strype Ann. Ill, i, 39- HENRY BOVEL, B.D. Cantab. 1554, Prebendary of Southwell (Normanton) 1559, Rector of Keggsworth, Leicestershire, 1554, was deprived of his prebend before the 8th of June 1562, and of his rectory in 1560, and as appears from S.P. • Dom. Add. Eliz. XI, 45, fled abroad either in or before that year. According to Bridge-water’s Concertatio, he died in exile. He became Rector of Ringstead, St. Andrew, Norfolk, in 15.51. Cooper Ath. Cantab. I, 451. GEORGE BULLOCK, D.D. Cantab. 1557 (ordained ostiary in London Dec. 1553), Prebendary of Durham (loth Stall) 1554, Master of St. John’s College, Cambridge, 1554, Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity 1556, and Rector of Much Munden, Herts., about 1556, was deprived of all four preferments and fled over seas, but was captured by pirates who robbed him of all he possessed. He was at Antwerp in 1567 where he died in 1580. D.N.B. VII, 254. Gillow I, 338. GILBERT BOURNFORD, or BURFORD, B.D. Oxon 1554, Ch. Ch. Oxon B.A. 1540-1, M.A. 1545 (ordained Acolyte March 1553-4 at Oxford), Prebendary of Wells (Hazel-beare) 1555, Rector of Hazelbury Pluncknet 1555, and of Clotworthy 1556, both in Somerset, was deprived in 1560 (Strype Ann. Ill, i, 39). He was also appointed to the Chancellorship (Wood says in 1554 but this must be wrong), which owing to the accession of Elizabeth he was unable to obtain (Fasti, I, 135). He went to Louvain at once. In the list of fugitives beyond the sea, printed Strype Ann. II, ii, 596-7, and dated agth of January, 1576, he is called ‘ Gilford Barford, Clerk of Somerset.’ In Frere’s Marian Reaction his surname is given as Benford. In October 1579 he was still living in great poverty at Louvain. S.P. Dom. Eliz. CXXXII, 47. C..R.S. I, 19, 23, 42, 46. ROBERT BORLAND. Prebendary of York (Stillington) 1558, was deprived in 1559, if we may trust Rymer’s Foedera XV, 563. THOMAS BYAM. Prebendary of St. Paul’s (Brondesbury) 1560 was succeeded after deprivation in 1562. Cf. Strype Grindal, 87. GILES CAPEL, M.A. Oxon 1545, Prebendary of Wells (White Lakington) 1554, and Rector of Yeovilton, Somerset, 1554, was succeeded after deprivation in 1560. He had been Fellow of All Souls, Oxon 1540, Rector of Duloe, Cornwall, 1541, Rector of How Caple, Herefordshire, 1549. He went abroad to Louvain early. His name occurs in Sander’s list, and in the list of fugitives beyond the sea dated 2gth January 1576 transcribed Strype Ann. II, ii, 596-7. He was still living at Louvaia in 1572 (Phillips Ancient Hierarchy, pp. 359-62). He was no doubt a member of the Herefordshire family of that name. According to the Concertatio died abroad before 1588.
Recommended publications
  • Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible

    Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible

    THE PREFATORY MATERIALS OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE Ý The Translators’ Dedication to King James and their Addresss to the Reader in the King James Bible. 1611 By Matthew Verschuur The Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible First published 2010 Copyright Matthew Verschuur This material has been produced for personal study, ministry teaching and Christian educational purposes. Bible Protector www.bibleprotector.com ¶ Introduction This work was written around 2003/2004. It was later condensed significantly and formed part of the Guide to the Pure Cambridge Edition. It is an initial treatment and attempt to understand the teachings and the references of the King James Bible translators’ scholarship. Since this work was analytical and notational in nature, and represented initial investigations into these details, it must contain various crudities and incomplete assessments. Thus, it must be stressed that this is only a novice study. As the King James Bible went to the press in 1611, a dedication was written by Thomas Bilson, and an admonition to the reader was written by Miles Smith. These two works in combination show the intention of the translators in their work, and explain various principles in their labouring to present of the Word of God. These two works are called “The Epistle Dedicatory” and “The Translators to the Reader”. This work treats both these statements. § I. Notes on The Epistle Dedicatory ¶ 1. Overview of The Epistle Dedicatory The Dedication was written by the 1611 translator, Thomas Bilson. It appeared in the 1611 Edition, and has been retained in Cambridge Bibles ever since. A full and proper Cambridge copy of The Epistle Dedicatory (TED) has been supplied, mainly because of slight differences that can be observed in it in different King James Bibles.
  • Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England

    Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England

    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 55, No. 4, October 2004. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 654 DOI: 10.1017/S0022046904001502 Printed in the United Kingdom Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England by PETER SHERLOCK The Reformation simultaneously transformed the identity and role of bishops in the Church of England, and the function of monuments to the dead. This article considers the extent to which tombs of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century bishops represented a set of episcopal ideals distinct from those conveyed by the monuments of earlier bishops on the one hand and contemporary laity and clergy on the other. It argues that in death bishops were increasingly undifferentiated from other groups such as the gentry in the dress, posture, location and inscriptions of their monuments. As a result of the inherent tension between tradition and reform which surrounded both bishops and tombs, episcopal monuments were unsuccessful as a means of enhancing the status or preserving the memory and teachings of their subjects in the wake of the Reformation. etween 1400 and 1700, some 466 bishops held office in England and Wales, for anything from a few months to several decades.1 The B majority died peacefully in their beds, some fading into relative obscurity. Others, such as Richard Scrope, Thomas Cranmer and William Laud, were executed for treason or burned for heresy in one reign yet became revered as saints, heroes or martyrs in another. Throughout these three centuries bishops played key roles in the politics of both Church and PRO=Public Record Office; TNA=The National Archives I would like to thank Craig D’Alton, Felicity Heal, Clive Holmes, Ralph Houlbrooke, Judith Maltby, Keith Thomas and the anonymous reader for this JOURNAL for their comments on this article.
  • Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, Watsonb@Usfca.Edu

    Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, [email protected]

    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Gleeson Library Librarians Research Gleeson Library | Geschke Center 2003 Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/librarian Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, History Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Watson, Benjamin Charles, "Recusant Literature" (2003). Gleeson Library Librarians Research. Paper 2. http://repository.usfca.edu/librarian/2 This Bibliography is brought to you for free and open access by the Gleeson Library | Geschke Center at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gleeson Library Librarians Research by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECUSANT LITERATURE Description of USF collections by and about Catholics in England during the period of the Penal Laws, beginning with the the accession of Elizabeth I in 1558 and continuing until the Catholic Relief Act of 1791, with special emphasis on the Jesuit presence throughout these two centuries of religious and political conflict. Introduction The unpopular English Catholic Queen, Mary Tudor died in 1558 after a brief reign during which she earned the epithet ‘Bloody Mary’ for her persecution of Protestants. Mary’s Protestant younger sister succeeded her as Queen Elizabeth I. In 1559, during the first year of Elizabeth’s reign, Parliament passed the Act of Uniformity, declaring the state-run Church of England as the only legitimate religious authority, and compulsory for all citizens.
  • The Elizabethan Protestant Press: a Study of the Printing and Publishing of Protestant Literature in English

    The Elizabethan Protestant Press: a Study of the Printing and Publishing of Protestant Literature in English

    THE ELIZABETHAN PROTESTANT PRESS: A STUDY OF THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING OF PROTESTANT RELIGIOUS LITERATURE IN ENGLISH, EXCLUDING BIBLES AND LITURGIES, 1558-1603. By WILLIAN CALDERWOOD, M.A., B.D. Submitted for the Ph.D. degree, University College. (c\ (LONBI 2 ABSTRACT Uninterrupted for forty-five years, from 1558 to 1603, Protestants in England were able to use the printing press to disseminate Protestant ideology. It was a period long enough for Protestantism to root itself deeply in the life of the nation and to accumulate its own distinctive literature. English Protestantism, like an inf ant vulnerable to the whim of a parent under King Henry VIII, like a headstrong and erratic child in Edward's reign, and like a sulking, chastised youth in the Marian years, had come of age by the end of the Elizabethan period. At the outset of Elizabeth's reign the most pressing religious need was a clear, well-reasoned defence of the Church of England. The publication of Bishop Jewel's Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae in 1562 was a response to that need and set the tone of literary polemics for the rest of the period. It was a time of muscle- flexing for the Elizabethan Church, and especially in the opening decades, a time when anti-Catholicism was particularly vehement. Consistently throughout the period, when Queen and country were threatened by Catholic intrigues and conspiracies, literature of exceptional virulence was published against Catholicism. But just as the press became an effective tool for defenders and apologists of the Church of England, it soon was being used as an instrument to advance the cause of further reform by more radical Protestants.
  • George, Thomas, and Bruno Ryves

    George, Thomas, and Bruno Ryves

    An Early-Modern New College Dynasty: George, Thomas, and Bruno Ryves The Ryves (pronounced ‘Reeves’) family of Blandford, Dorset, had its part to play in the history of New College and of the nation at large in the seventeenth century, yet the various Ryves are all but forgotten today, other than perhaps the civil war journalist, Bruno. Nevertheless, they were a dynasty of some importance in public and intellectual life, and George (1569-1613), Thomas (d. 1652), and Bruno (1596-1677) are the subjects of this note. George was Warden of New College from 1599-1613; his brother Thomas was a noted civil lawyer and writer; and their first cousin Bruno was a political journalist who ended his days as the Dean of Windsor.1 I. George Ryves George (1561-1613) was the eighth son of the large family of Ryves, of Damory Court, Blandford, Dorset. The family had owned this ancient property since the mid-sixteenth century, and the Ryves were to be remembered in the town through the foundation by George of ‘Ryves’s Almshouses’. Most of the original almshouses were destroyed by the Great Fire of 1731 in Blandford (now known as Blandford Forum), but the Ryves Almshouses in Salisbury Street, erected in 1682 for ten poor persons, escaped the fire and are today a listed building. George arrived at New College as a nineteen year-old in March 1579/80, and duly progressed through the full academic cursus as a theologian (B.A., 1582; M.A., 1686; B.D., 1594; D.D., 1599). He was elected Warden of his college in 1599, succeeding Martin Culpepper, and also served as Vice-Chancellor in 1601; as was usual for the time, he held while Warden various other ecclesiastical benefices, including a canonry of Winchester.
  • The Descent Into Hell

    The Descent Into Hell

    THE DESCENT INTO HELL: AN ELIZABETHAN CONTROVERSY By PATRICIA WEIGHTMAN STEWART M.A., Cambridge University, 1980 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of History We accept this thesis as conforming to the^ required standard THE UNIVERSITY'OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1984 ® Patricia Weightman Stewart, 1984 '6 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of #/s7~rt/ty The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 DE-6 (3/81) ABSTRACT The Protestant schism with Rome involved a rejection of Catholic beliefs about the nature of hell. As a result it was imperative that Protestants reinterpret)? a central article of Christian belief. This article was Christ's descent into hell which had long been accepted in the Apostles' Creed as having followed the death and burial of Christ. Debate about the meaning and purpose of Christ's descent grew in England during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. The Protestant emphasis on the Word as the all important foundation of faith meant that the Scriptures and the Church Fathers were consulted to establish the meaning of the article.
  • God's Secretaries: the Making of the King James Bible by Adam Nicolson (Harpercollins 2003)

    God's Secretaries: the Making of the King James Bible by Adam Nicolson (Harpercollins 2003)

    1 God's Secretaries: The Making of the King James Bible by Adam Nicolson (HarperCollins 2003) Study Guide When answering these questions for your purposes of study, it is best to answer them completely and in detail. It will help you review for the quiz. Preface 1. What is meant by the anonymity of the Translators and how did that impact the nature and quality of the translation of the KJV Bible? 2. What does it mean that the KJV Bible and its translators took the view of a “constant present” and that it was a “universal text.” 3. In what ways was the KJV Bible a “deeply political book?” Chapter 1 1. How did the passing of Elizabeth I of England and the succession of James of Scotland appear to the English people in 1603? 2. What did James I want the most for his realms and his world? Answer: peace but what did he mean by that? 3. How did the kings of England and Scotland compare in terms of the power of the monarchy, and national wealth? 4. How did Englishmen react to James I’s plans for union between England and Scotland? 5. What was the mistake that James I made at Newark? Chapter 2 1. What was London like in 1603 in terms of housing, cleanliness, and population? 2. Describe the impact of the plague of 1603 on London. What groups of people suffered the most from the plague and why? 2 3. Describe Lancelot Andrewes’ career in the Church of England. What were the various positions that he held? Why was he so highly respected? 4.
  • ABSTRACT One Christian's Plea: the Life, Ministry, and Controversies Of

    ABSTRACT One Christian's Plea: the Life, Ministry, and Controversies Of

    ABSTRACT One Christian’s Plea: The Life, Ministry, and Controversies of Francis Johnson Kenneth Scott Culpepper Mentor: William H. Brackney, Ph.D. Francis Johnson (1562-1618) served as pastor of the English Separatist congregation that became known as the “Ancient Church” from 1592 until his death in 1618. The congregation was first gathered in London under the guidance of Henry Barrow and John Greenwood before its members fled to Amsterdam in 1593 under Johnson’s leadership to escape persecution by English civil and ecclesiastical authorities. Johnson joined his flock in 1597 after being released from prison. His ministry was filled with strife and conflict as he sought to implement the Separatist ecclesiological ideal of a congregational polity. Despite the turbulence of his early years in Amsterdam, Johnson’s Ancient Church finally enjoyed a period of relative peace and growth from 1604-1608. Johnson caused a split within his own congregation in 1610. This fissure was created by his determination to pursue a more congregational rather than presbyterian polity in response to external conflicts with his former Cambridge pupil, John Smyth. After a self- imposed period of exile from 1613-1617 at Emden, East Friesland, Johnson returned to Amsterdam in 1617 to publish his final polemical work. He died at Amsterdam in 1618. In this research project, the author explored the evolving theological views, career, social context, polemical exhanges, controversies, and writings of Francis Johnson with two primary objectives. The first of these objectives was to analyze the course of Francis Johnson’s ecclesiological views as he transitioned from an early presbyterian position to congregationalism and back to presbyterianism before he finally came to moderate his original hard-line Separatism.
  • Diocesan Bishops of Worcester

    Diocesan Bishops of Worcester

    Diocesan Bishops of Worcester Bosel 680 Oftfor 691 Egwin 693 Wilfrith I 718 Milred about 743 Waermund 775 Tilhere 777 Heathured (AEthelred) 781 Denebeorht 798 Heahbeorht (Eadbert) 822 Ealhhun (Alwin) about 845 Waerfrith 873 AEthelhun 915 Wilfrith II 922 Koenwald 929 St. Dunstan 957 St. Oswald 961 Ealdwulf 992 Wulfstan 1003 Leofsige 1016 Beorhtheah 1033 Lyfing 1038 AElfric Puttoc 1040 Lyfing (restored) 1041 Ealdred 1046 St. Wulfstan II 1062 Samson 1096 Theulf 1113 Simon 1125 John de Pageham 1151 Alured 1158 Roger, bishop of Worcester 1163 Baldwin 1180 William de Narhale 1185 Robert Fitz-Ralph 1191 Henry de Soilli 1193 John de Constantiis 1195 Mauger of Worcester 1198 Walter de Grey 1214 Silvester de Evesham 1216 William de Blois 1218 Walter de Cantilupe 1237 Nicholas of Ely 1266 Godfrey de Giffard 1268 William de Gainsborough 1301 Walter Reynolds 1307 Walter de Maydenston 1313 Thomas Cobham 1317 Adam de Orlton 1327 Simon de Montecute 1333 Thomas Hemenhale 1337 Wolstan de Braunsford 1339 John de Thoresby 1349 Reginald Brian 1352 John Barnet 1362 William Wittlesey 1363 William Lynn 1368 Henry Wakefield 1375 Tideman de Winchcomb 1394 Richard Clifford 1401 Thomas Peverell 1407 Philip Morgan 1419 Thomas Poulton 1425 Thomas Bourchier 1434 John Carpenter 1443 John Alcock 1476-1486 Robert Morton 1486-1497 Giovanni De Gigli 1497-1498 Silvestro De Gigli 1498-1521 Geronimo De Ghinucci 1523-1533 Hugh Latimer resigned title 1535-1539 John Bell 1539-1543 Nicholas Heath 1543-1551 John Hooper deprived of title 1552-1554 Nicholas Heath restored to title
  • Lancelot Andrewes, John Overall, Hadrian À Saravia, Richard Clarke, John Layfield, Robert Tighe, Francis Burleigh, Geoffrey King, Richard Thomson, William Bedwell

    Lancelot Andrewes, John Overall, Hadrian À Saravia, Richard Clarke, John Layfield, Robert Tighe, Francis Burleigh, Geoffrey King, Richard Thomson, William Bedwell

    Translation Committees Wikipedia First Westminster Company, translated Genesis to 2 Kings: Lancelot Andrewes, John Overall, Hadrian à Saravia, Richard Clarke, John Layfield, Robert Tighe, Francis Burleigh, Geoffrey King, Richard Thomson, William Bedwell First Cambridge Company, translated 1 Chronicles to the Song of Solomon: Edward Lively, John Richardson, Lawrence Chaderton, Francis Dillingham, Roger Andrewes, Thomas Harrison, Robert Spaulding, Andrew Bing First Oxford Company, translated Isaiah to Malachi: John Harding, John Rainolds (or Reynolds), Thomas Holland, Richard Kilby, Miles Smith, Richard Brett, Daniel Fairclough, William Thorne Second Oxford Company, translated the Gospels, Acts of the Apostles, and the Book of Revelation: Thomas Ravis, George Abbot, Richard Eedes, Giles Tomson, Sir Henry Savile, John Peryn, Ralph Ravens, John Harmar, John Aglionby, Leonard Hutten Second Westminster Company, translated the Epistles: William Barlow, John Spenser, Roger Fenton, Ralph Hutchinson, William Dakins, Michael Rabbet, Thomas Sanderson (who probably had already become Archdeacon of Rochester) Second Cambridge Company, translated the Apocrypha: John Duport, William Branthwaite, Jeremiah Radcliffe, Samuel Ward, Andrew Downes, John Bois, Robert Ward, Thomas Bilson, Richard Bancroft. Old Testament For the Old Testament, the translators used a text originating in the editions of the Hebrew Rabbinic Bible by Daniel Bomberg (1524/5), but adjusted this to conform to the Greek LXX or Latin Vulgate in passages to which Christian tradition had
  • Thomas Bilson, His Family and Their Hampshire, Sussex, and Other

    Thomas Bilson, His Family and Their Hampshire, Sussex, and Other

    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 253 THOMAS BILSON, Bishop of Winchester, his family, and their Hampshire, Sussex, and other connections. By W. H. CHALLEN. PART TWO. (Continued from page 46.) 6. Thomas Bilson, B.D. and D.D. (born Winchester about 1547), who became the noted Bishop of Winchester. He was admitted to Winchester College 1559 age 11, and became Headmaster 1571 (age 23) till 1579, and Warden 1580.' He was Prebendary of the 8th Stall of Winchester 1576, Rector of Chawton 1574-77, Michelmersh 1577-86, Droxford 1583, King's Worthy 1586-95 (all in Hants), Bishop of Worcester 1595, Privy Councillor 1615; and Bishop of Winchester 1597 until 18 June 1616 when he died, and was buried (age 69) in Westminster Abbey. His I.P.M. dated 11 Nov. 1616 (C. 142/353/85) mentions properties in Hampshire and Sussex. He had in 1600 a lease of the manor of Faccombe, Hants, and, as Bishop of Winchester, the manor of Taunton, Devon, and bought in 1605 the manor of Mapledurham in Buriton, Hants, from the widow and sons of Henry Shelley (died 1585 in prison ; son of Thomas Shelley of Mapledurham and grandson of Sir William Shelley of Michelgrove in Clapham, Sx., Judge of the Common Pleas) ; and purchased in 1607 Weston manor in Buriton. He left no will, administration being granted in the Dean and Chapter of Westminster court to his relict Anne Bilson. She was buried 8 November 1643 at Petersfield and was the daughter of Thomas Mill (Mylles), Barrister at Law, Recorder of Southampton, M.P. for Southampton (1553), and lessee of the old manor of Grove Place in Nursling, Hants, and is perhaps the Anne Mylles whose baptism 8 December 1565, without parentage, is registered at St.
  • Religious Toleration in English Literature from Thomas More to John Milton

    Religious Toleration in English Literature from Thomas More to John Milton

    Religious Toleration in English Literature from Thomas More to John Milton Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Justin R. Pepperney, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: John N. King, Advisor Christopher Highley Luke Wilson Copyright by Justin R. Pepperney 2009 Abstract The purpose of this dissertation is to examine how the idea of religious toleration was represented in early modern English polemical prose, poetry, and other literary genres. I argue that religious toleration extends from what is permissible in spiritual practice and belief, to what is permissible in print, and texts on religious toleration encouraged writers to contemplate the status of the discourse to which they contributed. Although the study begins and ends with analysis of two authors whose writings on toleration have received extensive critical attention, this dissertation also applies the latest theoretical framework for understanding religious toleration to writers whose contribution to the literature of toleration has previously been less well documented. Thomas More‘s Utopia (1516) outlines an ideal state with apparently progressive institutions and social practices, including property shared in common, abolition of the monetary system, and religious toleration. Contrary to the view of previous criticism, however, the image of a tolerant society in More‘s Utopia is unlike the modern ideal of toleration as a foundational principal of modern pluralism. Although More also argued against toleration of heresy in his later polemical works, he engaged with the concept of toleration to contemplate the efficacy of the dialogue as a persuasive tool.