[59] Notes Erasmus' Paraphrases, Anti-Calvinism, and the Seventeenth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[59] Notes Erasmus' Paraphrases, Anti-Calvinism, and the Seventeenth Notes Erasmus' Paraphrases, Anti-Calvinism, and the Seventeenth-Century Debate about the English Reformation by Gregory D. Dodds in the last decades of Elizabeth I's reign, the doctrine of predes- Beginningtination became an increasingly divisive issue within English society. Divines such as Antonio de Corro at Oxford and Peter Baro at Cambridge began a small but potent critique of Calvinist theological hegemony. Their opposition to the doctrine of predestination proved influential and contributed to a more widespread anti-Calvinist movement, later derided as Arminianism, during the first half of the seventeenth century. While there was significant variation among anti-Calvinists throughout the decades prior to the Civil War, in the mid-seventeenth century many of those opposed to Calvinism reprised Erasmus' bi-dimensional approach to the problem of predestination. On the one hand, they suggested that a belief in the freedom of the human will had biblical support. On the other hand, and more importantly, they argued that the entire topic was difficult, mysterious, and therefore an adiaphoron, or a nonessential tenet of faith.' By downplaying the centrality of the issue within a culture that was dominantly predestinarian, anti-Calvinists were, in essence, attempting to create a space for non-predestinarian thought.; Soon, however, the debate shifted from a theological debate to a controversy over history. What was the nature of the sixteenth-century English reformation? What type of church was established by Edward VI and Elizabeth I? It was obvious to most that Calvinism had become orthodoxy for the vast majority of English theologians, but how exclusively Calvinist was England? 'Nieholas Tyacke,Anti-CaLvinists: The Riseof EnglishArminianism, c. 1590-1640(Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 1987), 29-86. Peter Lake,Moderate Puritans and theElizabethan Church (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1982), 201-4Z. ZE.g.,Lancelot Andrewes, XCVI sermons by the RightHonorabLe and ReverendFather in God, LancelotAndrewes (London, 1632), 18-19, 420,and 548. 'William Lamont writesthat "by declaring,in effect,predestination as a 'no-go area', Laud and his associatesachieved the sameeffect as if they had floodedthe market in the 1630swith Arminianapologetics." Arguing for silencewas not a religiouslyor politicallyneutral policy. See WilliamLamont, "The Riseof ArminianismReconsidered," Past and Present 107 (1985):230. [59] 60 As contentious as these questions were in the seventeenth century, they remain central questions debated by modern scholars.4 Overlooked in this debate is the importance of the English translation of Erasmus' Paraphrases for seventeenth-century anti-Calvinists. In order to support free will theology within the Church of England, anti- Calvinists argued that predestination was not an intrinsic part of that Refor- mation. Those who demanded conformity with Calvinist orthodoxy were thus seeking to change English religion. Calvinists, conversely, argued that anti-Calvinists, or Arminians, were upsetting the established religion of the English church. Therefore, in a sense, the debate was over whether Calvinists or anti-Calvinists were innovators. It was not easy, however, to prove that the establishment of English Protestantism was non-predestinarian, given the well-known positions of Luther, Calvin, and leading English reformers. Throughout the seventeenth century anti-Calvinists, therefore, turned to the English translation of Erasmus' Paraphrases on the New Testament as evidence that free will theology was an acceptable, perhaps even a central, component of English Protestantism. Royal injunctions by both Edward VI and Elizabeth I had required churches to own and display the English Paraphrases. Some Restoration Latitudinarians even claimed that the English Reformation, rather than being influenced by Luther or Calvin, was fundamentally Eras- mian in nature. Erasmus thus represented one of the few good historical arguments against the long-standing dominance of Calvinism within English religious culture. One of the first seventeenth-century writers to challenge Calvinism with Erasmus was Thomas Bilson, Bishop of Winchester.5 Writing to his Calvinist 4Buildingon the workof PatrickCollinson, Nicholas Tyacke argues that there existedin Eliz- abethan and early Stuart Englanda Calvinistconsensus that wasdestabilized by the rise of En- glishArminianism. Subsequent work by PeterLake, Kenneth Fincham, Anthony Milton,among others,has substantiatedthe basicpremises of Tyacke'sposition. See Tyacke,Anti-Calvinists, and his essay"Puritanism, Arminianism and Counter-revolution,"in Nicholas Tyacke,Aspects of EnglishProtestantism, c. 1530-1700(Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001), 135-37; and Peter Lake,"Calvinism and the EnglishChurch 1570-1635,"in MargoTodd, ed., Reforma- tion and Revolution:Politics and Religionin EarlyModern England (New York:Routledge, 1995), 179-207.A minorityview initiated by PeterWhite maintainsthat there wasa broadspectrum of allowablebelief in Elizabethanand early Stuart religionand that free will theologywas a part of an Englishvia media.Peter White, Predestination,Policy, and Polemic:Conflict and Consensus in the EnglishChurch from the Reformationto the CivilWar (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1992). 5ThomasBilson, The surveyof Christssufferings for mansredemption and of hisdescent to Hades or Helfor ourdeliverance (London, 1604), 94,132, 233, 483. .
Recommended publications
  • Thesis Template for Researchers
    University of Huddersfield Repository Walker, Bethany E. THE RISE OF ANTI-CATHOLICISM IN ELIZABETHAN ENGLAND 1558-1603 Original Citation Walker, Bethany E. (2018) THE RISE OF ANTI-CATHOLICISM IN ELIZABETHAN ENGLAND 1558-1603. Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/34767/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ THE RISE OF ANTI-CATHOLICISM IN ELIZABETHAN ENGLAND 1558-1603 BETHANY EMMA WALKER A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MA (by Research) The University of Huddersfield August 2018 Copyright statement i. The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Puritanism Notes
    Puritanism Who were the Puritans? They are a group of Protestants in England who sought to purify (hence the name, “puritan”) the Church of England (Anglicanism) by removing the elements of Anglican Christianity that they considered to be too “Roman Catholic.” They are the type of Christianity that dominated the colonies in North America. What did the Puritans oppose in the Church of England? Answer: Anything they considered to be too “Roman Catholic” -Using crosses in churches -Certain priestly garments -Celebrating communion at an altar -Religious images -Wealth and luxury -Bishops (though some Puritans allowed for an episcopacy) -Celebrating Christmas or saint’s days -Having godparents -Kneeling during communion -Having an organ in church -Etc. Where did the Puritans come from? They primarily arose during the reign of Elizabeth in England (a Protestant) who hoped the Church of England would be a middle way (via media) between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism. Whereas Anglicanism (and episcopacy) united the country, the Puritans wanted presbyterian or congregational leadership which threatened the unity of England. In 1593 an act was passed that allowed Puritans to be arrested if they didn’t attend Anglican church services. After Elizabeth died she was succeeded by James I. James needed the bishops of the Church of England to unify his country, so religious groups that did not belong to that (Anabaptists, Independents, etc.) received less toleration. In 1605, due to English oppression of Catholics, a group of Catholics rented a space below where the British Parliament met. There they put large wine barrels filled with gunpowder in an attempt to blow up the king and several Puritans who sat in Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible
    THE PREFATORY MATERIALS OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE Ý The Translators’ Dedication to King James and their Addresss to the Reader in the King James Bible. 1611 By Matthew Verschuur The Prefatory Materials of the King James Bible First published 2010 Copyright Matthew Verschuur This material has been produced for personal study, ministry teaching and Christian educational purposes. Bible Protector www.bibleprotector.com ¶ Introduction This work was written around 2003/2004. It was later condensed significantly and formed part of the Guide to the Pure Cambridge Edition. It is an initial treatment and attempt to understand the teachings and the references of the King James Bible translators’ scholarship. Since this work was analytical and notational in nature, and represented initial investigations into these details, it must contain various crudities and incomplete assessments. Thus, it must be stressed that this is only a novice study. As the King James Bible went to the press in 1611, a dedication was written by Thomas Bilson, and an admonition to the reader was written by Miles Smith. These two works in combination show the intention of the translators in their work, and explain various principles in their labouring to present of the Word of God. These two works are called “The Epistle Dedicatory” and “The Translators to the Reader”. This work treats both these statements. § I. Notes on The Epistle Dedicatory ¶ 1. Overview of The Epistle Dedicatory The Dedication was written by the 1611 translator, Thomas Bilson. It appeared in the 1611 Edition, and has been retained in Cambridge Bibles ever since. A full and proper Cambridge copy of The Epistle Dedicatory (TED) has been supplied, mainly because of slight differences that can be observed in it in different King James Bibles.
    [Show full text]
  • Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 55, No. 4, October 2004. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 654 DOI: 10.1017/S0022046904001502 Printed in the United Kingdom Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England by PETER SHERLOCK The Reformation simultaneously transformed the identity and role of bishops in the Church of England, and the function of monuments to the dead. This article considers the extent to which tombs of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century bishops represented a set of episcopal ideals distinct from those conveyed by the monuments of earlier bishops on the one hand and contemporary laity and clergy on the other. It argues that in death bishops were increasingly undifferentiated from other groups such as the gentry in the dress, posture, location and inscriptions of their monuments. As a result of the inherent tension between tradition and reform which surrounded both bishops and tombs, episcopal monuments were unsuccessful as a means of enhancing the status or preserving the memory and teachings of their subjects in the wake of the Reformation. etween 1400 and 1700, some 466 bishops held office in England and Wales, for anything from a few months to several decades.1 The B majority died peacefully in their beds, some fading into relative obscurity. Others, such as Richard Scrope, Thomas Cranmer and William Laud, were executed for treason or burned for heresy in one reign yet became revered as saints, heroes or martyrs in another. Throughout these three centuries bishops played key roles in the politics of both Church and PRO=Public Record Office; TNA=The National Archives I would like to thank Craig D’Alton, Felicity Heal, Clive Holmes, Ralph Houlbrooke, Judith Maltby, Keith Thomas and the anonymous reader for this JOURNAL for their comments on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • PREBENDARIES DEPRIVED UNDER QUEEN ELIZABETH Part I
    Ampleforth Journal 17:2 (1912) 205-219 PREBENDARIES DEPRIVED UNDER QUEEN ELIZABETH Part I John B. Wainewright O THE AMPLEFORTH JOURNAL FOR JULY 1911, the present writer contributed a paper entitled ‘Archdeacons deprived under Queen Elizabeth’. As several readers found it Tinteresting, he now proposes to follow it up by the present list, from which the names of Bishops, Deans, and Archdeacons, who held prebends or canonries with their other ecclesiastical promotions, have been omitted. WILLIAM ALLEN, M.A. Oxon 1554, Prebendary of York 1558 (?), Fellow of Oriel 1550, Principal of St. Mary’s Hall, Oxford 1556, if he as a layman had a prebend at York (which seems doubtful as his name does not occur in Le Neve), probably resigned it together with his office of Principal in 1559. He crossed to Flanders 1561, but returned in 1562. He again crossed the sea in 1565 in which year he was deprived of his Fellowship at Oriel. He was ordained priest at Cambrai in the same year. In 1568 he founded the English College at Douay which in 1578 was transferred to Rheims. He was Regius Professor of Divinity at Douay 1570, D.D. 1571, Canon of Cambrai about 1575, Cardinal Priest of the title of S. Martino 1587; Archbishop-nominate of Mechlin 1589. He died the i6th of October 1594. D.N.B. I, 314. Gillow I, 14. THOMAS ARDEN, Prebendary of York (Wighton) 1556, Worcester (14) 1558, and Hereford (Bartonsham) 1559, Rector of Hartlebury, Worcestershire, 1554, and Vicar of Southstock, Oxon, 1551, was deprived in 1560 or 1561.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Via Media. Charismatics and the Church of England in the Twenty-First Century
    271 MARK J. CARTLEDGE A New Via Media. Charismatics and the Church of England in the Twenty-First Century Many Charismatic Anglicans sense tensions between their experience of the Spirit and church order - not least in the area of worship. Mark Cartledge argues that the two need to be held together in creative tension. He examines in detail the relationships between charisma and office; between spontaneity and liturgical order in worship; and between story and doctrine. lntroduction 1 To be a Pentecostal or Charismatic and a committed member of the Church of England is a peculiar thing indeed. Anglicanism arose from the melting pot of the English Reformation with concerns as much political as theological. Pentecostalism has its roots in the Wesleyan Holiness tradition as well as Afro-American Slave religion. 2 Anglicanism is certainly an inheritor of the Enlightenment as well as the Patristic credal Faith; while Pentecostalism emphasizes the orality of faith through testimony and song rather than articles of faith and canon law. However, since the early 1960s, when the Episcopal priest Dennis ·Bennet experienced his baptism in the Spirit in Van Nuys California, pentecostal spirituality has found a place within Anglicanism. 3 The focal date in the Church of England was the establishment in 1964 of the Fountain Trust, launched to promote charismatic renewal within the churches. 4 Seventeen years later the Church of England officially took notice of the charismatic movement with its report, The Charismatic Movement in the Church of England. 5 This was followed in 1986 by Josephine Bax's General Synod report I am grateful to my colleagues and friends at 3 Peter Hocken, Streams of Renewal: The St John's College for discussions on this Origins and Early Development of the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Gleeson Library Librarians Research Gleeson Library | Geschke Center 2003 Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/librarian Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, History Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Watson, Benjamin Charles, "Recusant Literature" (2003). Gleeson Library Librarians Research. Paper 2. http://repository.usfca.edu/librarian/2 This Bibliography is brought to you for free and open access by the Gleeson Library | Geschke Center at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gleeson Library Librarians Research by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECUSANT LITERATURE Description of USF collections by and about Catholics in England during the period of the Penal Laws, beginning with the the accession of Elizabeth I in 1558 and continuing until the Catholic Relief Act of 1791, with special emphasis on the Jesuit presence throughout these two centuries of religious and political conflict. Introduction The unpopular English Catholic Queen, Mary Tudor died in 1558 after a brief reign during which she earned the epithet ‘Bloody Mary’ for her persecution of Protestants. Mary’s Protestant younger sister succeeded her as Queen Elizabeth I. In 1559, during the first year of Elizabeth’s reign, Parliament passed the Act of Uniformity, declaring the state-run Church of England as the only legitimate religious authority, and compulsory for all citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabethan Protestant Press: a Study of the Printing and Publishing of Protestant Literature in English
    THE ELIZABETHAN PROTESTANT PRESS: A STUDY OF THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING OF PROTESTANT RELIGIOUS LITERATURE IN ENGLISH, EXCLUDING BIBLES AND LITURGIES, 1558-1603. By WILLIAN CALDERWOOD, M.A., B.D. Submitted for the Ph.D. degree, University College. (c\ (LONBI 2 ABSTRACT Uninterrupted for forty-five years, from 1558 to 1603, Protestants in England were able to use the printing press to disseminate Protestant ideology. It was a period long enough for Protestantism to root itself deeply in the life of the nation and to accumulate its own distinctive literature. English Protestantism, like an inf ant vulnerable to the whim of a parent under King Henry VIII, like a headstrong and erratic child in Edward's reign, and like a sulking, chastised youth in the Marian years, had come of age by the end of the Elizabethan period. At the outset of Elizabeth's reign the most pressing religious need was a clear, well-reasoned defence of the Church of England. The publication of Bishop Jewel's Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae in 1562 was a response to that need and set the tone of literary polemics for the rest of the period. It was a time of muscle- flexing for the Elizabethan Church, and especially in the opening decades, a time when anti-Catholicism was particularly vehement. Consistently throughout the period, when Queen and country were threatened by Catholic intrigues and conspiracies, literature of exceptional virulence was published against Catholicism. But just as the press became an effective tool for defenders and apologists of the Church of England, it soon was being used as an instrument to advance the cause of further reform by more radical Protestants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Declaration of Sports As a Via Media: Popular Recreations and Religious Conflict in Early Seventeenth Century England
    THE DECLARATION OF SPORTS AS A VIA MEDIA: POPULAR RECREATIONS AND RELIGIOUS CONFLICT IN EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND By Christopher R. Steiner, B.A. Pennsylvania State University A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History to the Office of Graduate and Extended Studies of East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania December 14, 2019 ABSTRACT A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History to the Office of Graduate and Extended Studies of East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania Student’s Name: Christopher Steiner, B.A. Title: The Declaration of Sports as a Via Media: Popular Recreations and Religious Conflict in Early Seventeenth Century England Date of Graduation: December 14, 2019 Thesis Chair: Christopher Dudley, Ph.D. Thesis Member: Michael Gray, Ph.D. Abstract The conflict over popular recreations in early seventeenth century England arose out of the disorder caused by the social, economic, and demographic changes of the time. King James I and King Charles I issued the Declaration of Sports to protect recreations against attack from religious reformers. Most historians argue that the Stuart monarchs issued the declaration to assert their authority over the use of recreations. This thesis, through a close analysis of the Declaration of Sports and contemporary writings of the Stuart monarchs and their supporters, reveals that James I’s and Charles I’s recreational policies align with their ecclesiastical policies of creating a via media or middle way between Puritanism and Catholicism. The efforts to create a via media of sports reveal the conflict over popular recreations to include many of the religious, social, and cultural issues that led to the outbreak of civil war in the 1640s.
    [Show full text]
  • George, Thomas, and Bruno Ryves
    An Early-Modern New College Dynasty: George, Thomas, and Bruno Ryves The Ryves (pronounced ‘Reeves’) family of Blandford, Dorset, had its part to play in the history of New College and of the nation at large in the seventeenth century, yet the various Ryves are all but forgotten today, other than perhaps the civil war journalist, Bruno. Nevertheless, they were a dynasty of some importance in public and intellectual life, and George (1569-1613), Thomas (d. 1652), and Bruno (1596-1677) are the subjects of this note. George was Warden of New College from 1599-1613; his brother Thomas was a noted civil lawyer and writer; and their first cousin Bruno was a political journalist who ended his days as the Dean of Windsor.1 I. George Ryves George (1561-1613) was the eighth son of the large family of Ryves, of Damory Court, Blandford, Dorset. The family had owned this ancient property since the mid-sixteenth century, and the Ryves were to be remembered in the town through the foundation by George of ‘Ryves’s Almshouses’. Most of the original almshouses were destroyed by the Great Fire of 1731 in Blandford (now known as Blandford Forum), but the Ryves Almshouses in Salisbury Street, erected in 1682 for ten poor persons, escaped the fire and are today a listed building. George arrived at New College as a nineteen year-old in March 1579/80, and duly progressed through the full academic cursus as a theologian (B.A., 1582; M.A., 1686; B.D., 1594; D.D., 1599). He was elected Warden of his college in 1599, succeeding Martin Culpepper, and also served as Vice-Chancellor in 1601; as was usual for the time, he held while Warden various other ecclesiastical benefices, including a canonry of Winchester.
    [Show full text]
  • The Descent Into Hell
    THE DESCENT INTO HELL: AN ELIZABETHAN CONTROVERSY By PATRICIA WEIGHTMAN STEWART M.A., Cambridge University, 1980 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of History We accept this thesis as conforming to the^ required standard THE UNIVERSITY'OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1984 ® Patricia Weightman Stewart, 1984 '6 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of #/s7~rt/ty The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 DE-6 (3/81) ABSTRACT The Protestant schism with Rome involved a rejection of Catholic beliefs about the nature of hell. As a result it was imperative that Protestants reinterpret)? a central article of Christian belief. This article was Christ's descent into hell which had long been accepted in the Apostles' Creed as having followed the death and burial of Christ. Debate about the meaning and purpose of Christ's descent grew in England during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. The Protestant emphasis on the Word as the all important foundation of faith meant that the Scriptures and the Church Fathers were consulted to establish the meaning of the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Puritanism As Ecumenical Theology Carl R. Trueman
    PURITANISM AS ECUMENICAL THEOLOGY CARL R. TRUEMAN Philadelphia Given the standard historical narrative of the history of the English church, the whole idea that Puritanism might be considered as in any way ecumenical in orientation would seem to be somewhat bizarre. The traditional picture of Anglicanism is that of a church which built its theology and its liturgical practices through a careful reclamation of the broad patristic heritage. It thus presented to the world of the Reforma- tion a via media which was less obsessed with those things which made Protestantism different from medieval Catholicism and more concerned to produce a broad-based church capable of providing a spiritual home for a wide variety of theological opinions, a project which was successfully carried forward through the Reformation until after the Enlightenment., In this narrative, Puritanism was an aberration, a narrow creed which stopped the playing of ball games on a Sunday, nurtured intolerance towards those who held different opinions on various points of theo- logical trivia, and was ultimately sectarian, not catholic, in its ethos.2 To demolish the shibboleths of such a thesis would take considerable time. What I wish to do in this contribution is somewhat more modest: to provide sufficient counter-evidence to the accepted historical narrative to 1 The most famous advocate of the via mediathesis is, of course, John Henry Newman in his (in)famous Tract XC where he argued that the Thirty-Nine Articles could be interpreted in line with what was in essence Catholic teaching. The whole notion of Anglicanism as in some way doctrinally broad and tolerant is deeply embedded in the linguistic and literary traditions surrounding the Church of England, from the novels of Anthony Trollope to everyday language, eg.
    [Show full text]