DOCSLIB.ORG

Hawke's Bay Biodiversity Inventory Current State of Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hawke's Bay Biodiversity Inventory Current State of Knowledge Hawke's Bay Biodiversity Inventory Current State of Knowledge August 2014 HBRC Report No. RM 13/23 – 4554 Resource Management Group ISSN 2324-4127 (PRINT) ISSN 2324-4135 (ONLINE) 159 Dalton Street . Napier 4110 Private Bag 6006 Napier 4142 Telephone (06) 835 9200 Fax (06) 835 3601 Regional Freephone (06) 0800 108 838 Environmental Science - Land Science Hawke's Bay Biodiversity Inventory Current State of Knowledge August 2014 HBRC Report No. RM 13/23 – 4554 Prepared By: Keiko Hashiba, Resource Analyst Oliver Wade, Coastal Scientist Warwick Hesketh, Land Management Advisor Reviewed By: Stephen Swabey - Manager Science Approved By: Iain Maxwell - Group Manager – Resource Management Group Signed: ISSN 2324-4127 (PRINT) ISSN 2324-4135 (ONLINE) © Copyright: Hawke's Bay Regional Council Version 3 Contents Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 7 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Purpose and Structure of the Report .................................................................................... 8 2.1 Purpose of the Biodiversity Inventory ................................................................................ 8 2.2 Structure of the report ........................................................................................................ 9 3 Vulnerable species and their habitats ................................................................................... 9 3.1 Method ............................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Key findings ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1 Known key habitat types for ‘Threatened’ or ‘At Risk’ species ......................... 11 3.2.2 Threats ............................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Knowledge gap .................................................................................................................. 16 3.4 Where to from here – Threatened Species ...................................................................... 18 3.5 Recommendations – vulnerable species and their habitats ............................................. 18 4 Representative habitat types ............................................................................................. 19 Terrestrial ................................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Indigenous vegetation ...................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Method .............................................................................................................. 20 Classification of indigenous vegetation types ................................................................... 20 Extent of indigenous vegetation ....................................................................................... 20 Threat status of indigenous habitat types based on remaining extent ............................ 21 4.1.2 Vegetation-based indigenous habitat types ...................................................... 22 4.1.3 Extent of indigenous vegetation ........................................................................ 22 4.1.4 Threat status of each habitat type .................................................................... 25 4.1.5 Applications and limitations of the national databases .................................... 26 4.2 Where to from here – indigenous vegetation .................................................................. 26 4.3 Recommendations – indigenous vegetation .................................................................... 27 Freshwater ................................................................................................................................. 28 4.4 Rivers and Streams ............................................................................................................ 28 4.4.1 Tools and methods ............................................................................................ 28 4.4.2 River habitat types ............................................................................................. 29 4.4.3 Changes in the freshwater macroinvertebrate community .............................. 32 4.4.4 Identification of significant river habitats using FENZ and RiVAS ..................... 32 4.5 Freshwater wetlands......................................................................................................... 36 Hawke's Bay Biodiversity Inventory 7 August 2014 8.50 a.m. Version 3 4.5.1 Method .............................................................................................................. 36 4.5.2 Wetland habitat types of Hawke’s Bay.............................................................. 37 4.5.3 Changes in wetland extents .............................................................................. 37 4.5.4 Threats for wetland habitats ............................................................................. 39 4.6 Lakes.................................................................................................................................. 39 4.7 Where to from here - Freshwater ..................................................................................... 39 4.7.1 Rivers ................................................................................................................. 39 4.7.2 Freshwater wetlands ......................................................................................... 40 4.7.3 Lakes .................................................................................................................. 40 4.8 Recommendations – freshwater ....................................................................................... 41 Coastal and Marine ..................................................................................................................... 42 4.9 Coastal ............................................................................................................................... 44 4.9.1 Method .............................................................................................................. 44 4.9.2 Coastal habitat types ......................................................................................... 44 4.9.3 Changes in coastal habitats ............................................................................... 46 4.10 Marine 47 4.10.1 Method .............................................................................................................. 47 4.10.2 Marine habitat types ......................................................................................... 47 4.10.3 Changes in marine habitats ............................................................................... 47 4.11 Where to from here (Coastal and Marine) ....................................................................... 48 4.12 Recommendations – coastal and marine ......................................................................... 48 Historically Rare Terrestrial Ecosystems ....................................................................................... 49 4.13 Method 49 4.14 ‘Historically Rare Terrestrial Ecosystems’ found in Hawke’s Bay ..................................... 49 4.15 Where to from here – Historically Rare Terrestrial Ecosystems ....................................... 49 4.16 Recommendations - Historically Rare Terrestrial Ecosystems .......................................... 50 5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 51 6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 52 7 Glossary of abbreviations and terms .................................................................................. 53 8 References ........................................................................................................................ 54 Appendix A List of available data ............................................................................................ 62 Appendix B New Zealand Threat Classification System ............................................................ 66 Appendix C Threatened birds and their habitat requirements for Hawke’s Bay........................ 67 Hawke's Bay Biodiversity Inventory 7 August 2014 8.50 a.m. Version 3 Appendix D Habitat types defined by vegetation types and descriptions for Hawke’s Bay ........ 72 Appendix E Recommended Areas for Protection .................................................................... 85 Appendix F Proposed terrestrial biodiversity indicators and measures .................................... 86 Appendix G River Habitat Types for Hawke’s Bay .................................................................... 88 River habitat types (in FENZ classes) represented in Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s State of the Environment monitoring programme .................................................................... 92 Appendix H Historically Rare Terrestrial Ecosystems ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary of Native Bat, Reptile, Amphibian and Terrestrial Invertebrate Translocations in New Zealand
    Summary of native bat, reptile, amphibian and terrestrial invertebrate translocations in New Zealand SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 303 Summary of native bat, reptile, amphibian and terrestrial invertebrate translocations in New Zealand G.H. Sherley, I.A.N. Stringer and G.R. Parrish SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 303 Published by Publishing Team Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Male Mercury Islands tusked weta, Motuweta isolata. Originally found on Atiu or Middle Island in the Mercury Islands, these were translocated onto six other nearby islands after being bred in captivity. Photo: Ian Stringer. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. Individual copies are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright April 2010, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1173–2946 (hardcopy) ISSN 1177–9241 (PDF) ISBN 978–0–478–14771–1 (hardcopy) ISBN 978–0–478–14772–8 (PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing by Amanda Todd and layout by Hannah Soult. Publication was approved by the General Manager, Research and Development Group, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Methods 7 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Section Introduction
    Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 RE-INTRODUCTION PRACTITIONERS DIRECTORY 1998 Compiled and Edited by Pritpal S. Soorae and Philip J. Seddon Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 © National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, 1998 Printing and Publication details Legal Deposit no. 2218/9 ISBN: 9960-614-08-5 Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 Copies of this directory are available from: The Secretary General National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development Post Box 61681, Riyadh 11575 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Phone: +966-1-441-8700 Fax: +966-1-441-0797 Bibliographic Citation: Soorae, P. S. and Seddon, P. J. (Eds). 1998. Re-introduction Practitioners Directory. Published jointly by the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Re-introduction Specialist Group, Nairobi, Kenya, and the National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 97pp. Cover Photo: Arabian Oryx Oryx leucoryx (NWRC Photo Library) Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 CONTENTS FOREWORD Professor Abdulaziz Abuzinadai PREFACE INTRODUCTION Dr Mark Stanley Price USING THE DIRECTORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PART A. ANIMALS I MOLLUSCS 1. GASTROPODS 1.1 Cittarium pica Top Shell 1.2 Placostylus ambagiosus Flax Snail 1.3 Placostylus ambagiosus Land Snail 1.4 Partula suturalis 1.5 Partula taeniata 1.6 Partula tahieana 1.7 Partula tohiveana 2. BIVALVES 2.1 Freshwater Mussels 2.2 Tridacna gigas Giant Clam II ARTHROPODS 3. ORTHOPTERA 3.1 Deinacrida sp. Weta 3.2 Deinacrida rugosa/parva Cook’s Strait Giant Weta Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 3.3 Gryllus campestris Field Cricket 4. LEPIDOPTERA 4.1 Carterocephalus palaemon Chequered Skipper 4.2 Lycaena dispar batavus Large Copper 4.3 Lycaena helle 4.4 Lycaeides melissa 4.5 Papilio aristodemus ponoceanus Schaus Swallowtail 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Green Gecko Advocacy: Assessing Awareness & Willingness
    Wellington Green Gecko Advocacy: Assessing Awareness & Willingness An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in cooperation with Wellington Zoo. Submitted on March 3, 2017 Submitted By: Submitted to: Calvin Chen Daniela Biaggio James Doty Emilia Murray Michael Eaton Wellington Zoo Derrick Naugler Project Advisors: Professor Dominic Golding Professor Ingrid Shockey This report represents the work of four WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects, please see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Project i Abstract Due to the large proportion of native lizard species currently considered at risk or threatened, Wellington Zoo aimed to better understand public attitudes and awareness regarding the Wellington Green Gecko and New Zealand lizards in general. To assist the zoo, we surveyed the general public and interviewed both herpetological and conservation experts. Through these methods, we determined that the public lacks awareness of native lizards but has a high willingness to engage in conservation regarding geckos. From this data, we developed a public service announcement and a series of recommendations, focused on improving the public’s knowledge of native lizards, which Wellington Zoo can implement to foster gecko conservation in Wellington. ii Executive summary Figure A: The Wellington Green Gecko (Doty, 2017) The Wellington Green Gecko (shown in Figure A), Naultinus Elegans Punctatus, is a medium sized lizard that can measure up to approximately 200 mm in length and can be identified by its bright green back, white or yellow spots along its dorsal region and a vivid blue mouth lining (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, n.d.).
    [Show full text]
  • Oceania Species ID Sheets
    Species Identification Sheets for Protected Wildlife in Trade - Oceania - 3 Mark O’Shea 1 Mike McCoy © Phil Bender 5 Tony Whitaker © 2 4 Tony Whitaker © 6 WILDLIFE ENFORCEMENT GROUP (AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY · CONSERVATION · N. Z. CUSTOMS SERVICE) Numbered images above Crown Copyright: Department of Conservation Te Papa Atawhai. Photographers:1) Dick Veitch 1981, 2) Rod Morris 1984, 3) Gareth Rapley 2009, 4) Andrew Townsend 2000, 5) Paul Schilov 2001, 6) Dick Veitch 1979 Introduction Purpose of this resource: - Additional species that should be included in this booklet Wildlife trafficking is a large-scale multi-billion dollar industry worldwide. The illegal trade of - Sources of information, such as identification guides or reports, related to these wildlife has reached such prominence that it has the potential to devastate source populations species of wildlife, impacting on the integrity and productivity of ecosystems in providing food and - Domestic legislation regarding the regulation of trade in wildlife - Sources of photographs for identification purposes resources to the local economy. In order to protect these resources, legislation has been put in place to control the trade of wildlife in almost every country worldwide. Those assigned with - Details of wildlife seizures, including the smuggling methods enforcing these laws have the monumental task of identifying the exact species that are being traded, either as whole living plants or animals, as parts that are dried, fried or preserved, or as Any feedback can be provided directly to the Wildlife Enforcement Group: derivatives contained within commercial products. Stuart Williamson Senior Investigator, Wildlife Enforcement Group This booklet “Species Identification Sheets for Protected Species in Trade – Oceania” has been Customhouse, Level 6, 50 Anzac Avenue, Auckland, New Zealand developed to address the lack of resources, identified by customs agencies within Oceania, for Ph: +64 9 3596676, Fax: +64 9 3772534 identification of wildlife species in trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Tukituki Catchment Terrestrial Ecology Characterisation
    Tukituki Catchment Terrestrial Ecology Characterisation Prepared for Hawke's Bay Regional Council December 2011 EMT 11/13 HBRC Plan Number 4294 Hawke's Bay Regional Council Tukituki Catchment Terrestrial Ecology Characterisation CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study area .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Location and key features .............................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 ‘Catchment Units’ for description..................................................................................... 2 1.3 Report structure ................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.4.1 Landform, geology and soil............................................................................................. 3 1.4.2 Climate ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.3 Land cover and flora .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Potentially Significant Natural Areas for Wellington City: Stage 1 Desktop Analysis
    AUDIT OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS FOR WELLINGTON CITY: STAGE 1 DESKTOP ANALYSIS R3942 AUDIT OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS FOR WELLINGTON CITY: STAGE 1 DESKTOP ANALYSIS Areas of potentially significant indigenous biodiversity occur throughout Wellington City. Contract Report No. 3942 December 2016 Project Team: Astrid van Meeuwen-Dijkgraaf - Site assessments and report author Steve Rate - Site assessments and report review Prepared for: Wellington City Council PO Box 2199 Wellington 6140 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT SCOPE 1 2.1 Stage 1 Desktop analysis 1 2.2 Study area 2 3. METHODS 4 4. ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT 5 4.1 Wellington and Cook Strait Ecological Districts 5 4.1.1 Wellington Ecological District 6 4.1.2 Cook Strait Ecological District 7 4.2 Ecological domains 10 4.3 Singers and Rogers ecosystem classification 10 4.4 Threatened Environment Classification 11 4.5 Protected Natural Areas 13 5. RESULTS 13 5.1 Overview of potential SNAs in Wellington City 13 5.2 Potential SNAs requiring additional information and/or site visits 16 5.3 Management criteria 20 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 20 REFERENCES 21 appendices 1. Policy 23 of the Regional Policy Statement for the Wellington region (GWRC 2013) 24 2 Explanatory notes for SNA database fields 26 3 ‘Threatened’, ‘At Risk’, and regionally uncommon species in Wellington region 28 4 Management Criteria (revised from Wildland Consultuants and Kessels Ecology 2015) 32 5 Sites without any indigenous vegetation or habitat remaining that have been deleted from the database 33 6 Ecosystem types that are no longer commonplace or are poorly represented in existing protected areas 35 7 Potential SNAs in Wellington City grouped by significance and survey requirements 37 8 Summary descriptions and assessment of Potential SNAs in Wellington City 48 © 2016 Contract Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Lizard Action Plan for Poneke Area, Wellington Conservancy
    Lizard action plan for Poneke Area, Wellington Conservancy 2009–2014 Lizard action plan for Poneke Area, Wellington Conservancy 2009–2014 Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 5086 Wellington, New Zealand This plan was prepared by Lynn Adams TSO Fauna, Wellington Conservancy. © Copyright 2009, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN: 978-0-478-14600-4 (printed copy) ISBN: 978-0-478-14601-1 (web pdf) Cover photo: Wellington green gecko (Naultinus elegans punctatus). Photo: Bryan Welch. In the interest of conservation, DOC supports paperless electronic publishing. When printing, paper manufactured with environmentally sustainable materials and processes is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Goals and objectives 3 3. Conservation management actions 4 3.2 Turakirae Head 4 3.3 Baring Head 4 3.4 Wellington Harbour islands 5 3.5 Makara coast 7 3.6 Other sites 7 3 .7 Translocation / disease monitoring 8 3.8 Biosecurity 9 3.9 RMA protection 10 3.10 Legal requirements 11 4. Species 12 4.1 Wellington green gecko 12 4.2 Pacific gecko 13 4.3 Spotted skink 15 4.4 Ornate skink 17 4.5 Forest gecko ‘southern North Island’ 18 4.6 Common gecko “Marlborough mini” 19 4.7 Brown skink 21 4.8 Copper skink 22 4.9 Common gecko 23 4.10 Common skink 24 5. Conclusions 25 6. References 25 iii Abstract The Poneke Area lizard action plan has been developed to guide the survey, monitoring and management of lizard fauna within the Area. It provides background material, information on the species and a list of actions for the next five years, prioritised as high, medium or low.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 / 2020 06 08 10 12
    WELLINGTON ZOO ANNUAL REPORT 2019 / 2020 06 08 10 12 Trust Chair Report Chief Executive Report COVID-19 Our New Strategy & Me Tiaki, Kia Ora 14 26 42 68 94 Whānau Tinana Hinengaro Wairua Oranga Our Role Our Animals Our Purpose Our Community A Healthy Organisation Integrating the United 15 World leading animal 27 Recognition and 43 Engaging, message 68 Model values 95 Nations Sustainable care so the animals live involvement of the driven experiences aligned behaviours Development Goals: their best lives Zoo’s conservation to build community Life On Land, Life expertise environmental action Sustain a safety 96 Below Water, Climate Science based animal 36 conscious culture Action, Quality welfare practices so Effective field 56 Integrating Te Ao 88 Education, Responsible the animals are happy partnerships for long Māori within the Zoo Embed wellbeing 99 Consumption and term conservation for our people Production, and Strategic species 38 outcomes Maintaining lasting 89 Sustainable Cities and planning for our site partnerships for Grow our people 105 Communities and staff expertise Focused investment 64 community support through learning Contents in conservation and conservation and development Developing 18 innovations outcomes initiatives for social, Sustain financial 116 environmental and success by data economic sustainability driven decision making Commit to 118 outstanding daily visitor care 130 134 Improve and 121 maintain the physical assets Independent Financial Statements Auditor’s Report Meet all legal 125 and compliance requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Tree Variation Kāpiti Coast District Plan - Ecological Assessment
    URBAN TREE VARIATION KĀPITI COAST DISTRICT PLAN - ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT R3525m DRAFT URBAN TREE VARIATION KĀPITI COAST DISTRICT PLAN - ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Contract Report No. 3525m July 2015 Project Team: Astrid van Meeuwen-Dijkgraaf - Report author, field work Steve Rate - Report author, peer review Bruce MacKay - Field work Kelvin Lloyd -Peer review Prepared for: Kāpiti Coast District Council Private Bag 60601 Paraparaumu 5254 WELLINGTON OFFICE: 22 RAIHA STREET, ELSDON, P.O. BOX 50-539, PORIRUA Ph 04-237-7341; Fax 04-237-7496 HEAD OFFICE: 99 SALA STREET, P.O. BOX 7137, TE NGAE, ROTORUA Ph 07-343-9017; Fax 07-343-9018, email [email protected], www.wildlands.co.nz EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prior to human occupation, lowland Kāpiti Coast District comprised areas of dunes, dune, riparian and lowland forest, and wetlands. Less than 6% of these indigenous vegetation types remains within the relevant ecological districts and only about 22% of the Tararua foothill forest still exists within the Wellington Region. Much of the lowland areas are categorised as Acutely Threatened and Chronically Threatened Land Environments. The urban areas of Kāpiti Coast District all occur in these lowland areas where indigenous vegetation is significantly reduced from its original extent. Thus indigenous vegetation within the urban areas is threatened at national, regional and district levels. Trees in an urban landscape are important for a variety of reasons; ecological as well as aesthetic, economic, and cultural. The most ecologically valuable trees are found within ecological sites, which are remnants of original forests. These areas reflect the underlying historical vegetation pattern, are reservoirs of genetic variability within a species and provide habitat for flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plans (Concept Adapted from Rate Et Al
    2009 OPPORTUNITIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION OF LONGBUSH RESERVE AND THE WAIKERERU HILLS Prepared by: Ecoworks NZ Ltd. 369 Wharerata Road RD1 Gisborne Ph: 06 867-2888 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ecoworks.co.nz SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES The following priorities have been ranked with reference to the long-term objectives of the Longbush/Waikereru restoration project. When resources are tight, higher priority management actions should take precedence over lower priority management activities. However, when funding does become available it is important to incorporate lower priority activities into current management plans (concept adapted from Rate et al. 2008). Very high priority: Pest control in Longbush Reserve - Continue to control vertebrate predators to near nil densities. - Continue to exclude vertebrate grazers from entering the reserve. Very high priority: Weed control within Longbush Reserve - Continue systematic surveillance and control of weeds within Longbush Reserve. High priority: Project funding - Prepare an initial budget for the proposed restoration activities. - Begin applying to appropriate funding organisations. High priority: Additional pest control - Extend current pest control to include the 113 ha Waikereru Reserve. Pest control should target rats, mustelids, feral cats, possums and feral goats. High priority: Cessation of livestock grazing - Remove domestic livestock from the Waikereru Reserve. Ensure the fence is maintained to prevent livestock from re-entering the reserve. - Cull feral goats from within the reserve. High priority: Additional weed control - Extend current regime of surveillance and control to include the Waikereru Reserve. - Systematically monitor the Waikereru Reserve for weed invasion following the removing of livestock. Medium priority: Kiwi/weka proof fence - Construct a kiwi/weka proof fence around the perimeter of the Waikereru hills.
    [Show full text]
  • Mana Island Ecological Restoration Plan
    14. Archaeological and waahi tapu sites 14.1 THE ISLAND'S HUMAN HISTORY Mana Island has a long and fascinating history of human occupation (Day 1987; Horwood 1991). The island's name is a contraction of Te Mana o Kupe ki Aotearoa, which refers to the ability of the explorer Kupe to cross the ocean to Aotearoa. The island was inhabited around 1400A.D. (Chester & Raine 1990; Horwood 1991), but little is known of the Maori history prior to its occupation by Ngati Toa in the 1820s. During the 1840s Te Rangihaeata (a nephew of Te Rauparaha) lived in an elaboratedly carved wharepuni near the site of the current boatshed (Day 1987; Horwood 1991). Archaeological excavation of the beach ridge revealed evidence of two periods of occupation: the fifteenth century and the early nineteenth century through to the present (Horwood 1991). In 1832 the island was sold by Te Rauparaha, Te Rangihaeata and Nohoroa (Te Rauparaha's brother) to Alexander Davidson, George Bell and Archibald Mossman for goods to a collective value of £24. Soon after this Davidson sold his share to Bell, and Mossman sold his share to Frederick Peterson (Day 1987). Bell was the first European settler on the island, where he resided from 1832 until his death there in 1838. The first wool clip from the island was exported to Sydney in June 1835, and is believed to be among the earliest wool exported from New Zealand. Bell also established a small whaling station which was taken over in 1837 by Alec and Thomas Fraser, who leased the station from Peterson.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on SPECIES Common Gecko (Woodworthia Maculata)
    NOTES ON SPECIES Common Gecko (Woodworthia maculata ) These geckos are widespread throughout New Zealand and have traditionally been considered a good species for beginners to develop their keeping skills. This view needs revision in light of several factors. Firstly, the species is strictly nocturnal, and as a result there is little daytime activity for keepers to observe. This can be a disappointment to younger keepers, who can quickly lose interest in feeding and caring for animals that seem to consider hiding in dark corners their sole purpose in life. Secondly, recent research indicates that rather than being a single species, these geckos are in fact a species complex, a group of closely related but distinct species separated from each other geographically and genetically. This explains the difficulties some people have experienced in breeding Woodworthia maculata , when their founder stock has not all originated from the same locality. Formal description of the species within the complex is awaited. Like most other species, the males can be intolerant of each other and some serious fights can occur if more than one is housed in a cage. But with Common Geckos it is more complicated than this, and some individual specimens, both males and females, can also develop an intolerance to geckos of other species if housed with them. Sometimes a particular animal will live in apparent harmony with other species for a considerable time, then launch an attack for no apparent reason. House this species separately from others if safety is of prime concern. If caging shortages require keeping these geckos with other species, consider it a short term measure, and check the other occupants' toes for damage at regular intervals.
    [Show full text]