FIBA) 3-On-3 Rules Will Apply with Modifications Or Exceptions As Indicated in This Document
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Basketball Study Guide
Basketball Study Guide westlake.k12.oh.us/.../#1702BA Grotthuss History Dr. James Naismith was a physician, clergyman and professor of Physical Education. He was an instructor at the YMCA in Springfield, Mass. In 1891 he asked a custodian to nail two peach baskets to a gymnasium balcony, which just happened to be 10 feet high. This was the beginning of Basketball. 1893-After metal baskets replace wooden peach baskets, a bag made of netting attached to a metal hoop is first used 1894-Backboards are first used, preventing spectators from reaching over the balcony and interfering with shots. 1897-Teams of five players on a side become standard 1908-Personal fouls limited to five 1918-Backboards placed two feet into the court 1923-Penalizing violations such as traveling and double dribble with loss of possession instead of awarding free throws to defending team 1932-Introduction of the 10-second rule for getting the ball across mid-court. 1937-Elimination of the center jump after each score 1939-Backboards placed four feet into the court 1944-Allowing unlimited substitution 1953-One and one free throw rule 1954-NBA adopts 24-second shot clock 1955-Bonus free throws allowed only if first one is made 1968-Dunk shot banned in college 1977-Dunk shot reinstated 1985-NCAA adopts 45-second shot clock 1986-NCAA adopts the 3 point shot Players There are 5 players on an official basketball team, (1 center, 2 forwards, and 2 guards). These players play offense and defense on both ends of the court. img.sparknotes.com/. /basketball www.ssqq.com/stories/ images/sports%20basketba The Court! This diagram shows the standard measurements for American high school, college, and professional basketball courts. -
The Problematic Use of Criminal Law to Regulate Sports Violence
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 99 Article 4 Issue 3 Spring Spring 2009 The aM nly Sports: The rP oblematic Use of Criminal Law to Regulate Sports Violence Jeffrey Standen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey Standen, The aM nly Sports: The rP oblematic Use of Criminal Law to Regulate Sports Violence, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 619 (2008-2009) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/09/9903-0619 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 99, No. 3 Copyright © 2009 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printedin U.S.A. THE MANLY SPORTS: THE PROBLEMATIC USE OF CRIMINAL LAW TO REGULATE SPORTS VIOLENCE With increasingfrequency, the criminal law has been used to punish athletes who act with excessive violence while playing inherently violent sports. This development is problematicas none of the theories that courts employ to justify this intervention adequately take into account the expectations of participantsand the interests of the ruling bodies of sports. This Essay proposes a standardfor the interaction of violent sports and criminal law that attempts to reconcile the rules of violent sports with the aims of the criminal law. JEFFREY STANDEN* I. INTRODUCTION When not on the playing field, an athlete stands in the same relation to the criminal law as does any other citizen.1 The particular requirements of the athlete's sport, where that sport includes acts of a violent nature, do not supply the athlete a special defense of "diminished capacity. -
New York University Intramural Department Team Handball Rules
New York University Intramural Department Team Handball Rules Team Rules and Responsibilities 1. Teams must start or finish (due to injury or ejection) with three (3) players minimum. Four players are ideal to play (including the goalie). 2. Forfeits: Any team without the minimum four (4) players on the designated playing court of the scheduled start time and further exceeds the 5 minute grace period, will be disqualified from the game and future play in the league. 3. ONLY the team captain may consult with the referees or supervisor when the ball is NOT in play. 4. Substitutions can only be made during timeouts, after fouls and violations, or if the ball goes out of bounds. If this is not followed, a technical foul will be called and a penalty throw will be awarded. 5. Unsportsmanlike conduct against a scorekeeper, referee, any opposing player, or a teammate, a rejection from the game will occur. 6. Any team using an ineligible player will forfeit all remaining games on the schedule and will be removed from the league. 7. No player may play for more than one team. 8. Teams and players are susceptible to being barred from the playoffs. 9. Players who receive red cards during play will be ejected from the contest and possibly suspended for the following game. 10. ALL players are expected to display sportsmanlike conduct in compliance with NYU Intramurals. Equipment 1. Proper attire in line with Intramural policies, regulations, and guidelines is required – only non- marking sneakers, shorts or sweatpants must be worn to participate. 2. -
3 on 3 Tournament Rules
3 on 3 Tournament Rules All games must start with a minimum of 2 players per team. A minimum of 3 players must be registered to a maximum of 5 players per team. The game clock will begin at the scheduled time of the game whether teams are ready to play or not. All player names must appear on the scoresheet prior to the game beginning with the first player listed being 1 TEAM ROSTER designated as the "Team Captain" who will be the only player permitted to speak for the team. Games will be defaulted to the opposing team after five (5) minutes from the scheduled start of the game if the other team fails to provide the minimum of 2 players. A default will be recorded as a 1-0 win for the opposing team. The court supervisor will hold the final authority on the 'official time'. The dimensions of the 3on3 court will be played on a 'half-court' with a modified half-court line, sidelines and baseline being used as the playing surface. The traditional '3-point line' 2 THE COURT and the marked key will be used in all games. The top, sides, and bottom of the backboard are INBOUNDS. The metal support pieces from the top base unit to the backboard are OUT- OF-BOUNDS. 3 BALL SIZE A size 6 (28.5) basketball shall be used for all levels EXCEPT: 7th/8th Boys (regualaton) 4 GAME DURATION One, 25-minute game. No halftime. 5 INITIAL POSSESSION A coin flip shall determine which team gets the choice of first possession. -
11-Player Youth Tackle Rules Guide Table of Contents
FOOTBALL DEVELOPMENT MODEL usafootball.com/fdm 11-PLAYER YOUTH TACKLE RULES GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................2 1 Youth Specific Rules ..........................................................................3 2 Points of Emphasis ............................................................................4 3 Timing and Quarter Length ...........................................................5 4 Different Rules, Different Levels ..................................................7 5 Penalties ..................................................................................................7 THANK YOU ESPN USA Football sincerely appreciates ESPN for their support of the Football Development Model Pilot Program INTRODUCTION Tackle football is a sport enjoyed by millions of young athletes across the United States. This USA Football Rules Guide is designed to take existing, commonly used rule books by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) and the NCAA and adapt them to the youth game. In most states, the NFHS rule book serves as the foundational rules system for the youth game. Some states, however, use the NCAA rule book for high school football and youth leagues. 2 2 / YOUTH-SPECIFIC RULES USA Football recommends the following rules be adopted by youth football leagues, replacing the current rules within the NFHS and NCAA books. Feel free to print this chart and provide it to your officials to take to the game field. NFHS RULE NFHS PENALTY YARDAGE USA FOOTBALL RULE EXPLANATION 9-4-5: Roughing/Running Into the Roughing = 15; Running Into = 5 All contact fouls on the kicker/holder Kicker/Holder result in a 15-yard penalty (there is no 5-yard option for running into the kicker or holder). 9-4-3-h: Grasping the Face Mask Grasping, pulling, twisting, turning = 15; All facemask fouls result in a 15-yard incidental grasping = 5 penalty (there is no 5-yard option for grasping but not twisting or pulling the facemask). -
Pdf-Ywqbwrye1042
N. the ex-Marine and three-time Emmy winner worked at television stations in the California Bay Area; Raleigh, an American questionably detained in North Korea for more than a year. no, puffy elbow pad for protection. He was ejected in the 116-108 overtime loss at the AAC on Dec. leaving the game in the fourth quarter and sitting out Game 3.DALLAS -- A strained right hip flexor limited backup center to three minutes during the ' win in Tuesday's Game 4 of the NBA Finals The NBA is known for its grueling. something that helped their turnaround from being blown out in Sacramento last week to coming right back and blowing out Golden State on Friday. The first was a 3-pointer from from up top on a blown rotation by the Rockets. rolling to the basket, He's a different guy now. I don't think they care if they lose by one or 50. MLB, and argue. the challenge is how quickly everyone can get on the same page. You don't want it to be a long adjustment. How about ? so the Mavs would have to overpay to prevent Minnesota from matching. but was outscored 10-0 down the stretch. You wake up," Billups said. I just finally got to a point last year before I got hurt where I was figuring it out. Deng had started Tuesday night after sitting out Monday's practice with flu-like symptoms." Deng added that he tried to play thorough the injury, The shot sliced Dallas' lead to six, Calif. -
Accusations of Unfairness Bias Subsequent Decisions: a Study of Major League Umpires Authors: Travis J
Title: Accusations of Unfairness Bias Subsequent Decisions: A Study of Major League Umpires Authors: Travis J. Carter1*, Erik G. Helzer2. Affiliations: 1Department of Psychology, Colby College. 2The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School. *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: What happens when decision-makers are accused of bias by an aggrieved party? We examined the ball-and-strike calls of Major League Baseball umpires before and after arguments from players or managers resulting in ejection. Prior to ejection, the accusing team was, in fact, disadvantaged by the home plate umpire’s calls. After the ejection, umpires did not revert to neutrality—they exhibited the opposite bias, advantaging the accusing team. This pattern was only evident when the ejection was related to pitch location, not other kinds of ejections. Using a laboratory analogue of the umpires’ situation, we replicated this post-accusation tendency with experimental participants. This study further revealed that decision-makers were unaware of the shifts in their behavior in response to the accusations, and another survey indicated that this tendency violates beliefs about fairness. These results suggest that performance following accusations may unwittingly succumb to this insidious tendency to favor the accusing party. One Sentence Summary: After being (rightly) accused of biased behavior toward one team, MLB Umpires responded by committing the opposite bias, now giving more favorable calls to the accuser’s team. MANUSCRIPT UNDER REVIEW—PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION 1 Main Text: Among the many responsibilities leaders bear is a commitment to fairness. Perceptions of fairness are important for many organizational and interpersonal outcomes (1–3), and leaders, as decision-makers, find themselves in the unique position to uphold fairness standards. -
2014 & 2015 NCAA Men's Basketball Rules
MEN’S BASKETBALL 2013-14 AND 2014-15 RULES 89486 Rule Book Covers.indd 1 5/17/13 9:26 AM Sportsmanship is a core value of the NCAA. The NCAA Committee on Sportsmanship and Ethical Conduct has identified respect and integrity as two critical elements of sportsmanship and launched an awareness and action campaign at the NCAA Convention in January 2009. Athletics administrators may download materi- als and view best practices at the website below: www.NCAA.org, then click on “Student-Athlete Programs,” then “Sportsmanship” and select the “Resources/Best Practices” tab. 1-BasketballRules.indd 1 8/5/2013 9:15:00 AM 1-BasketballRules.indd 2 8/5/2013 9:15:01 AM 2014 & 2015 NCAA MEN’S BASKETBALL RULES Sportsmanship The primary goal of the rules is to maximize the safety and enjoyment of the student-athlete. Sportsmanship is a key part of that goal. Sportsmanship should be a core value in behavior of players and bench personnel, in crowd control by game management and in the officials’ proper enforcement of the rules governing related actions. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1-BasketballRules.indd 1 8/5/2013 9:15:01 AM [ISSN 1042-3877] THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 6222 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46206-6222 317/917-6222 WWW.NCAA.ORG AUGUST 2013 Manuscript Prepared By: Art Hyland, Secretary-Rules Editor, NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee Edited By: Ty Halpin, Associate Director of Playing Rules Administration. NCAA, NCAA logo and NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION are registered marks of the Association and use in any manner is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Association. -
Individual Officiating Techniques (IOT) Version 1.1 This Referees Manual Is Based on FIBA Official Basketball Rules 2020
FIBA REFEREES MANUAL Individual Officiating Techniques (IOT) version 1.1 This Referees Manual is based on FIBA Official Basketball Rules 2020. In case of discrepancy between different language editions on the meaning or interpretation of a word or phrase, the English text prevails. The content cannot be modified and presented with the FIBA logo, without written permission from the FIBA Referee Operations. Throughout the Referees Manual, all references made to a player, coach, referee, etc., in the male gender also apply to the female gender. It must be understood that this is done for practical reasons only. August 2020, All Rights Reserved. FIBA - International Basketball Federation 5 Route Suisse, PO Box 29 1295 Mies Switzerland fiba.basketball Tel: +41 22 545 00 00 Fax: +41 22 545 00 99 This material is created by the FIBA Referee Operations. If you identify an error or a discrepancy in this material,please notify the FIBA Referee Operations at [email protected] FIBA REFEREES MANUAL Individual Officiating Techniques / v1.0 P / 2 Foreword Basketball, as a game, is progressing in skill and speed every day. It is a natural environmental development process that takes place unconditionally and it is called evolution. The game and more so refereeing has completely changed from 10 years ago. Presently, top level refereeing is improving at least at the same speed as the game itself and higher standards of performance are expected every year. The pace of change has necessitated the adoption of a motto: “What was considered exceptionally good yesterday, is considered standard quality today and below average quality tomorrow”. -
Referee Hand Signals and Cheat Sheet
Referee Hand Signals and Cheat Sheet Types (T) (I=Procedural, P=Personal Foul, T=Technical Foul) Signal Text Penalty T Duration Comments Timeout: None I Up to 2 minutes. Possession required if Discretionary or Injury. RULE: 4 per game. not a dead ball. Follow with tapping on 4-27 Max 2 per half. chest for my TO. 4-28 Score None I Made by Lead Official. Retrieve ball and place at X. Check the penalty box after a goal. No Score None I End of period horn, goal-crease violation, 4-9 too many players, teams offside, whistle, head off stick, play on or foul by scoring team, timeout. Face-Off None I 4-3 Alternate Possession Possession I Must be recorded on the scorecard. 4-33 Ball in Possession on None I Attack/Defense must Face-off or start the stay out of center area clock at Half. until called. Ball has entered attack None I Occurs within 10 seconds of Must stay in the attack area. crossing the midline. area during the last 2 4-14 minutes of regulation 4-15 play. ONLY IN 4TH QTR 3-3 & TO TEAM THAT'S LEADING. Out of Bounds. Possession I Don’t forget to look to Direction of Play. bench for sub opportunity. NOT ON ENDLINE. Failure to Advance the Possession I 20 seconds (including 4 Player must be in Ball. second goalie count) to the contact with some part midline of the midline area. 10 seconds to the goal area. Airborne players do not count. Loose Ball I A call is made and the ball is not in possession of a player. -
1 Golden Strip Baseball / Softball Rules and Regulations – Revised 2/16/21
Baseball & Softball 2 nd -8th Rules and Regulations Playing rules not specifically covered in this document shall be covered by the Official Rules & Regulations of the South Carolina High School Baseball and Softball Leagues. Table of Contents Balks …………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………. 2 Balls ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Base lines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Base Stealing ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Bats ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Batting ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Batting Order ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Batting out of turn …………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Bunting ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Calling "Time" to Stop Play ……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Catcher’s equipment …………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Cleats ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Coaches ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Complete Game …………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Courtesy Runners …………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Defensive Substitution ……………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Dropped Third Strike …………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Dugouts ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Ejection ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Forfeits ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Head First Slide …………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Helmets ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Infield Fly Rule …………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Intentional Walks …………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Number -
Violence in Professional Sports: Is It Time for Criminal Penalties?
Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 2 Number 1 Article 5 1-1-1982 Violence in Professional Sports: Is it Time for Criminal Penalties? Richard B. Perelman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard B. Perelman, Violence in Professional Sports: Is it Time for Criminal Penalties?, 2 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 75 (1982). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol2/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VIOLENCE IN PROFESSIONAL SPORTS: IS IT TIME FOR CRIMINAL PENALTIES? By RichardB. Perelman* I. INTRODUCTION The problem is well-known among sports fans. Violence in pro- fessional sporting events has reached almost epidemic proportions. Al- most all daily newspapers report about hundreds of penalty minutes for brawls in National Hockey League (NHL) games, fistfights in National Basketball Association (NBA) contests and about injuries suffered in National Football League (NFL) battles.' Recent commentary has ex- amined new case law in the area2 and the possibility of civil suit to redress damage.3 The criminal law confronted the problem in the form of a bill introduced in 1980 in the House of Representatives by Rep. Ronald M. Mottl.4 The bill would have penalized convicted offenders * B.A., University of California, Los Angeles, 1978.