DOCSLIB.ORG

Parish, Town Councils (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parish, Town Councils (PDF) Parish and town council submissions to the Milton Keynes Council electoral review. This PDF document contains 10 submissions from parish and town councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Gre gory, Eleanor Sent: 07 June 2012 13:59 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: FW: Number of councillors in Milton Keynes Unitary Council Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Re d From: Bradwell Parish Council [mailto: Sent: 06 June 2012 17:51 To: Reviews@ Subject: Number of councillors in Milton Keynes Unitary Council We are Bradwell Parish Council in Milton Keynes. We are responding to your request asking how many borough councillors there should be on Milton Keynes Council following your boundary review. This parish council is of the opinion that the number of councillors should increase from the present 51 to 54 when the new boundaries are established. Regards Harold Atkins Clerk to Bradwell Parish Council, 2 08/06/2012 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Gre gory, Eleanor Sent: 07 June 2012 14:07 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: FW: Electoral Review Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Re d From: Parish Council - Parish Manager [mailto: Sent: 07 June 2012 12:33 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review Stantonbury Parish Council met last night and wish to respond to the Electoral Review as follows: No, 51 Councillors is not enough for an expanding city. Regards Dianne Prew Administrator Stantonbury Parish Council Parish Office 08/06/2012 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Gre gory, Eleanor Sent: 13 June 2012 12:25 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: FW: Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Re d From: Sent: 13 June 2012 11:34 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Dear Sirs Emberton Parish Council wishes to support your view that every councillor in each ward of the borough should represent the same number of electors. Regards Karen Goss Clerk to Emberton Parish Council 13/06/2012 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Liam Costello Sent: 14 June 2012 15:21 To: Re views@ Subject: Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Dear Sir, Thank you for the opportunity to partake in the consultation on the Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Council. The Town Council has considered the issues and believes that the appropriate size for Milton Keynes Council should be 60 members to reflect the current and predicted population growth in the borough. Olney Town Council has had a long standing policy that the Olney ward should remain a multiple member ward rather than being sub‐divided into two wards, and we wish that this policy objective is maintained in this review. Regards Liam Costello Town Clerk Olney Town Council 18/06/2012 BOW BRICKHILL PARISH COUNCIL The Review Officer (Milton Keynes), Local Government Boundary Commission for England, Layden House, 76-86 Turnmill Street, London. EC1M 5LG. 15th June 2012 Dear Sirs, RE: ELECTORAL REVIEW OF MILTON KEYNES This matter was discussed at our Parish Council meeting on Thursday 14th June 2012. It was agreed by the Council that firstly, this is the wrong time for an electoral review due to many homes still being built across Milton Keynes and therefore the ratio will change. 51 Councillors may be the correct amount, however, Bow Brickhill Parish Council at present are within a single member ward and feel it important to remain this way, retaining the village links we currently enjoy with Little Brickhill, Woburn Sands and Wavendon Village and therefore retaining the integrity of the village. We would therefore appreciate you taking these comments into account and noting that Bow Brickhill Parish Council are against proposals of becoming a three member ward. Yours faithfully, Debbie Mayer Parish Clerk Bow Brickhill Parish Council Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Dominic Warner [ Sent: 18 June 2012 09:15 To: Re views@ Subject: Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Council Dear Sir, Re: Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Council Please accept this e‐mail as confirmation that at the May 2012 meeting of Campbell Park Parish Council, it was resolved that future best interests of the residents of Milton Keynes would be served by a Council consisting of 57 Members. Yours faithfully, Dominic Warner Parish Manager/Clerk This email is intended for the named recipient and may contain information of a private or sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and then delete this email immediately. Please consider the environment and do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. 18/06/2012 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: He len Hupton Sent: 18 June 2012 12:04 To: Re views@ Subject: Electoral Review of Milton Keynes Dear Colleagues I am writing in response to your letter dated 8th May 2012 regarding the consultation on the appropriate number of councillors to be elected to Milton Keynes Council. I would confirm that West Bletchley Council considered the matter of “council size” for Milton Keynes th Council, as requested, at a meeting held on Monday 11 June 2012. Its comments were as follows: “West Bletchley Council considers that: - 51 councillors is an insufficient number to effectively represent the interests of all Milton Keynes’ various communities and that the number should be increased to 57.” Could you please confirm safe receipt of our comments? Regards Helen Hupton Clerk to West Bletchley Council 1 Porchester Close Bletchley Milton Keynes Tel: 01908 634030 Fax: 01908 648275 www.westbletchleycouncil.gov.uk 18/06/2012.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • December 2018
    Unitary Councillors Report December 2018 Appendix A Unitary Councillor Report (Snippets) Report from Cllr David Hopkins, Cllr Victoria Hopkins & Cllr Alice Jenkins – Representing Bow Brickhill at MK Council December 2018 Wavendon Properties - TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY WAVENDON PROPERTIES LIMITED LAND TWO THE EAST OF NEWPORT ROAD AND TO THE EAST AND WEST OF CRANFIELD ROAD AT WOBURN SANDS, BUCKINGHAM, MK17 8UH APPLICATION REF: 16/00672/OUT Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision • The Inspector recommended that the appeal be allowed and planning permission granted, subject to conditions. • For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State disagrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. He has decided to dismiss the appeal and refuse planning permission. DELEGATED DECISION - 20 NOVEMBER 2018 INTRODUCTION OF 20MPH SPEED RESTRICTIONS INTO NEW AND EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ESTATES. The Council Plan 2016 – 2020 sets out how Milton Keynes Council will work to achieve its ambitions for Milton Keynes and includes a Transport commitment to introduce 20mph speed limits into new estates and to support any community that requests a 20mph speed limit. Unitary Councillors Report December 2018 Snippets • Levante Gate – spoken with officers and no further contact from Guinness so I suggest this issue has been put on the back burner. • Blocked Gullies – residents in Bow Brickhill are naturally concerned by the fact that the guillies still appear blocked causing pooling and pedestrians risking getting soaked by passing vehicles. Carl Devereaux writes; The Gullies and Side entry kerb weirs where cleared as part of the whole of Bow Brickhill as requested by the Local Council September 2018 At the time it was requested to have Serco in to clear the excessive silt in the kerb lines in this location and the rest of the village.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Cycling Map a Map of the Redways and Other Cycle Routes in Milton Keynes
    MK Cycling Map A map of the Redways and other cycle routes in Milton Keynes www.getcyclingmk.org Stony Stratford A B C Little D Riv E Linford er Great O Nature Haversham Dovecote use Reserve Ouse Valley Park Spinney Qu e W en The H Grand Union Canal a A5 Serpentine te i E r g le L h a se Haversham a n u S Riv t O ne o er Grea Village School t r r e S e tr Burnt t e et Covert Sherington Little M Russell Linford 1 Stony Stratford Street Ouse Valley Park Park L Library i School St Mary and St Giles t t Lakelane l Ousebank C of E Junior School Co e lt L Spinney WOLVERTON s H i ol n m f MILL Road o Old W r Wolverton Ro olv Manor d ad Strat Tr ert ford Road on L ad i R Farm a Lathbury o n oad n R Slated Row i e n t t y Ouse Valley Park to STONY e School g R n e i o r r t Stantonbury STRATFORD a OLD WOLVERTON Haversham e L d h o S Lake y S n r Lake a d o W o n WOLVERTON MILL W d n Portfields e Lathbury a s e lea EAST W s R S s o E Primary School t House s tr R oa at e b C n fo r o hi u e r u ch n e d c rd ele o d The R r O rt u o y swo y H e Q ad n r y il t Radcliffe t l lv R h 1 a i n Lan 1 e v e e Ca School Wolverton A r er P r G Gr v L e eat e v Wyvern Ou a i n R M se Bury Field l A u k il d School l L e e i H din i l y gt a t s f le on A t al WOLVERTON MILL l o n e e G ve C Wolverton L r h G u a L a d venu Queen Eleanor rc i A SOUTH r h Library n n S C Primary School e A tr R Blackhorse fo e H1 at M y ee d - le t iv n r a y sb e Stanton REDHOUSE d o a u r Bradwell o Lake g d R r V6 G i a L ew y The r n Newport n n o g o e Low Park PARK a
    [Show full text]
  • Little Brickhill
    Little Brickhill Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Assessment Report Warren Farmhouse, Little Brickhill The Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project was carried out between 2008 and 2012 by Buckinghamshire County Council with the sponsorship of English Heritage and the support of Milton Keynes Council and Buckinghamshire District Councils © Buckinghamshire County Council and English Heritage 2012 Report produced by David Green All the mapping contained in this report is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100021529 (2012) All historic mapping contained in this report © Intermap Technologies Ltd All Historic Photographs are reproduced courtesy of the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies unless otherwise stated. Copies of this report and further information can be obtained from: Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Advisory and Compliance Service, Place Service, Buckinghamshire County Council County Hall Aylesbury Bucks HP20 1UY Tel: 01296 382656 Email: [email protected] Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 the Posse Comitatus, P
    THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 The Posse Comitatus, p. 632 THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 IAN F. W. BECKETT BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY No. 22 MCMLXXXV Copyright ~,' 1985 by the Buckinghamshire Record Society ISBN 0 801198 18 8 This volume is dedicated to Professor A. C. Chibnall TYPESET BY QUADRASET LIMITED, MIDSOMER NORTON, BATH, AVON PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY ANTONY ROWE LIMITED, CHIPPENHAM, WILTSHIRE FOR THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY CONTENTS Acknowledgments p,'lge vi Abbreviations vi Introduction vii Tables 1 Variations in the Totals for the Buckinghamshire Posse Comitatus xxi 2 Totals for Each Hundred xxi 3-26 List of Occupations or Status xxii 27 Occupational Totals xxvi 28 The 1801 Census xxvii Note on Editorial Method xxviii Glossary xxviii THE POSSE COMITATUS 1 Appendixes 1 Surviving Partial Returns for Other Counties 363 2 A Note on Local Military Records 365 Index of Names 369 Index of Places 435 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editor gratefully acknowledges the considerable assistance of Mr Hugh Hanley and his staff at the Buckinghamshire County Record Office in the preparation of this edition of the Posse Comitatus for publication. Mr Hanley was also kind enough to make a number of valuable suggestions on the first draft of the introduction which also benefited from the ideas (albeit on their part unknowingly) of Dr J. Broad of the North East London Polytechnic and Dr D. R. Mills of the Open University whose lectures on Bucks village society at Stowe School in April 1982 proved immensely illuminating. None of the above, of course, bear any responsibility for any errors of interpretation on my part.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology in Bedfordshire
    490000 500000 510000 520000 530000 Stow Longa Great Hemingford Harrowden JURASSIC 0 Brampton 0 Covington Abbots 0 Hargrave 0 0 LIMESTONE, GODMANCHESTER 0 0 Chelveston 0 7 7 2 2 SANDSTONE, Caldecott Lower Dean A14 SILTSTONE AND Shelton Tilbrook Grafham (T) MUDSTONE Geology in Bedfordshire Upper Dean Kimbolton A Buckden 5 1 Yelden Stonely Offord Cluny 9 Perry 3 RUSHDEN Offord D'Arcy Hilton Wilby Newton Bromswold Melchbourne Swineshead Diddington Irchester Great Little Pertenhall Great Staughton ) Doddington Wymington (T Staughton Highway Papworth 5 Southoe 4 Wymington St Agnes A Graveley Farndish Papworth Great Paxton JURASSIC Knotting Everard Keysoe MUDPoSdiTngOtoNn E, Riseley Little Wollaston Little Paxton Knotting Staughton Toseland Yelling SILTSTONE, A6 Green Hail Weston Strixton LIMEHSinTwiOckNE AND Souldrop Lower End SANDSTONE Keysoe Row Caxton 0 Staploe Duloe 0 0 Gibbet 0 0 Grendon ST NEOTS 0 0 ) Croxton 0 6 A 428(T Eltisley 6 2 Sharnbrook 2 Eaton Socon A Eynesbury Easton Maudit Bozeat Bolnhurst 1 Thurleigh Colmworth ( Bletsoe T JURASSIC ) SANDSTONE, Odell Felmersham JURASSIC MUDSTONE, LIMESTONE Wyboston Abbotsley Duck's Cross AND Milton Ernest SILTSTONE AND Chawston Great 9 Colesden Gransden 0 Pavenham SANDSTONE 5 ARGILLACEOUS Little A Wilden Gransden ROCKS Ravensden Roxton Waresley Warrington West End Tempsford Lavendon Stevington A421(T) Oakley Salph Church End Cold Clapham Renhold End Brayfield Turvey A428 Great Barford Gamlingay A 6 Newton (T Blossomville ) Hatley St Olney Clifton Bromham Blunham Everton Reynes George East 0
    [Show full text]
  • Stantonbury Ecumenical Partnership St Mary Magdalene, Willen Easter
    Stantonbury Ecumenical Partnership St Mary Magdalene, Willen Easter Day Sunday 5 April Today 6.30am Dawn Service at St James New Bradwell 8.30am Holy Communion with Rev Paul Smith 9.30am Morning Worship with Margaret Moakes. After the service the Well has invited us to join them for Tea, Coffee, Cake and an Easter Egg hunt. Banns of Marriage are being called today for Alex Elliott and Sally Evans . This week: Tuesday 7th April 10am Interment of ashes of Sonia Miles RIP 7.30 for 7.45 pm: Stantonbury Ecumenical Partnership Annual meetings (incorporating Anglican Vestry and Parochial Church Meeting) at St Lawrence Church, Bradwell With the Rugby World Cup now just six months away (18 Sept - 31 Oct) and MK being one of the chosen venues for group games, representatives from each church are invited to an information and resources evening on Monday 22 June, 7.30-9.30pm at The Church of Christ the Cornerstone, central Milton Keynes. If there is one meeting where you or anyone from your church can find out about Christian initiatives, ideas and resources connected to the Rugby World Cup in MK - this is it! Notice Re: Pew cushion fund . If anyone would like to contr ibute towards the new cushions the appeal fund is still open to help us make up the shortfall. The total cost is £2,070; we have raised £1,175 to date so any further donations, which can still be placed in a marked envelope in the weekly collection or to one of the ministers. Cheques payable to “Willen Church” would be most welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Characterisation
    Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Historic Landscape Characterisation County Archaeological Service 2006 © 12XX design by Communications Design Team, a not for profit service, Buckinghamshire County Council 01296 382717 [email protected] a not for profit service, Buckinghamshire County Council 01296 382717 [email protected] Team, © 12XX design by Communications Design 37HH artwork version2.indd 2 25/9/06 11:16:05 Foreword Contents Buckinghamshire enjoys a rich and diverse Executive Summary Part 3: Using Historic landscape which has been shaped by Landscape Characterisation mankind over hundreds of years giving every Part 1: Overview of the Study Overview place its own distinctive character. Background Strategic Planning Today’s landscape reflects the endeavours Methodology Landscape Character Assessment of prehistoric farmers, medieval lords and Historic Landscape Types Green Infrastructure Planning peasants, the gentry’s garden designers and Development Control Victorian surveyors. This historic landscape Part 2: Historic Landscape Profiles Conservation Area Appraisal project has for the first time mapped Historic Buckinghamshire Landscape Management these changes across the whole historic Aylesbury Vale District Community and Education county providing information to enrich our Chiltern District Research appreciation of Buckinghamshire’s special Milton Keynes rural character. The report summarises South Bucks District Part 4: Accessing Historic Landscape the study’s conclusions and shows how Wycombe District Characterisation Data and its information can be used to care for this Landscape History Technical Appendices wonderful asset for the benefit of current and Change and Sensitivity future generations. We urge all organisations and individuals with a responsibility for Buckinghamshire’s landscape to take heed of this study when planning for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Wind Farm Non Technical Summary
    Milton Keynes Wind Farm Non Technical Summary Preface The Environmental Statement (ES) summarised here, has been prepared in support of a planning application submitted to Milton Keynes Council (the “Council”) in August 2006 for the Milton Keynes Wind Farm (the “Proposal”). The ES has been prepared and compiled by E4environment Ltd (E4e), an independent environmental consultancy, on behalf of MK Windfarm Ltd (as the Applicant) and Your Energy Ltd (as the Developer). The Proposal is on farmland comprising Petsoe Manor Farm, 2.5km east of the village of Emberton, and is for the purpose of generating electricity from wind energy. The ES is presented in three main volumes, namely: Volume 1 – Non Technical Summary The non technical summary (NTS) presents a summary of the Proposal, its likely environmental impacts and proposed mitigation. Volume 2 – Written Statement main text The written statement comprises: • An introduction and description of the Applicant/Developer and the scoping and consultation process; • The reasons for the site selection and a description of the Proposal. Then for each environmental issue identified through the scoping and consultation process the following is provided: • A description of the prevailing baseline conditions; • An assessment of the likely affects of the Proposal during construction and operation; • The mitigation measures proposed to avoid, minimise or compensate for possible adverse environmental effects. Volume 3 – Figures Volume 3 comprises the figures which show the site location, site layout, wind farm construction details, landscape character, photomontages, wireframes, and maps exhibiting the zone of visual influence (ZVI), sites of ecological and archaeological significance, and noise monitoring locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Codes
    PAGE: 1 DETAILS OF DECISIONS MADE WEEK BEGINNING 2nd May 2005 Decision Codes AGRAPP Agricultural Notification – Approved PD Permitted development (Planning Permission Not Required) AGRPPR Agricultural Notification – PEAVNZ Advert consent with standard conditions Planning Permission Required ALLOW Appeal Allowed PER Permitted APPWD Appeal Withdrawn PERLBZ Listed Building consent CATREE No objection to works to tree in Conservation Area PHEDGZ Hedgerow can be removed CSS Called in by the Secretary of State for decision PRESMZ Approval of reserved matters DEEMD Hazardous Substance Deemed Consent PTALLW Appeal allowed in part DISMIS Appeal Dismissed PTCON Permit works to tree in CA HEDGN Hedgerow Notice Not Required PTPOZ Tree preservation order consent HZPER Hazardous Substances Approval RCONAZ Conservation area consent refusal LAWFUL Lawful Use/Development READVZ Advert consent refused LEGAL Subject to a legal Agreement REF Refused NCAD Negative certificate of appropriate development REFLBZ Listed Building consent refused NDET Appeal RETURN Invalid application returned NOELB No objections Ecclesiastical L.B RHEDGZ Hedgerow to be retained NOOBJ No objections raised Circ. 18/84 or 14/90 RTCON Trees in CA objections/split decision NPW Application not proceeded with RTPOZ Tree preservation order consent refused PANRQ Prior approval not required SOSA Approved by Secretary of State PAREQ Prior approval required SPLITZ Advert split decision PAREQA Prior approval required and approved TCASPL Split response to trees in CA notification PAREQR Prior
    [Show full text]
  • TRADES. [ B::Ckingijam· HIRE
    ~330 SHO TRADES. [ B::CKINGijAM· HIRE. SHlRT & CoLLA& MANUFRS.-contd. Burrows George, Iver, Uxbridge Fleet Mrs. A. The Common, Amersha.m Robinson & Cleaver J.imited (of Belfastj, Burrows John, 17 Mitre st. Buckingham Flint Mrs. Sarah, Akeley, Buckingham 156 to 170 Regent street w (T N 1070 Butcher Mrs Charles,Broughton, Newport Floyd Mrs. Elizabeth, .105 Newport road, Gerrard; TA "Linloom, London") Pagnell New Bradwell, Wolverton & 101 & 102 Cheapside, London E c; Butler G. 197 Gordon rd. High Wycombe FloydJ. Geu. Lousley row.PrincesRisboro' & 22 Church street, Liverpool ; factories. Butler William J ames, Green lane, Foster J. 15 Chiltern st. W a.ltcm,Aylesbury Banbridge, eo. Down & Belfast, Ireland Datchet, Windsor Foulks James, 2 Vicarage road, Brad- Caple Thos. Shenley Brk. end. Bletchley well, \Volverton Carr Richard, Dean street, .Marlow Fowle•· William, 2 Queen's road,Chesham SHOPKEEPERS. Causby Miss E.Winchendon Low.Aylesbry Fox Miss E. 75 Germain street, Chesham Adams Albert, 31 School street, New Caves Arth. Jas. 44 Jersey rd. Wolverton Foxley W. London rd.Loughton,Bletchley Bradwell, Wolverton Chamberlain T. Bow Brickhill, Bletchley Francis Mrs. A. 7 Russell st.E'tonyStratfrd Adams George, Chackmore, Buckingham Chambers Mrs. E. Ledger's road, Slough Francis W. T.33 Victoria st.HighWycmbe Adams George, Uxbridge road, Slough Chappell Mrs. S. Stewkley, Leighton Bzzrd Franklin Frank, 79 New street, Aylesbury Admans P. G. 27 Diamond road, Slough Cheshire Alfd. E. North Marston, Winslow French Jn. Wm. Green la.Datchet,Windsr Ager Harry, 10 Tickford st.NewportPgnll Child Herbert, High st. Chalvey, Slough French S. 1 Brocas stmet, Eton, Wir,uisor Ager Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2046 the London Gazette, 18Th March 1960
    2046 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 18TH MARCH 1960 BUCKS COUNTY COUNCIL Extension of Speed Limits at Akeley, Bletchley, Bow Brickhill, Castlethorpe, Great Kingshill, Halton, Sherington and Stoke Goldington Removal of Speed Limit at Haversham, Westcott and Wolverton Notice is hereby given that the Bucks County Council intend to make application to the Minister of Transport for his consent to the making of an Order, the effect of which will be that the roads specified in the First Schedule hereto shall be deemed to be roads in a built up area for the purposes of the Act, and that the roads specified in the Second Schedule hereto shall be deemed not to be roads in a built up area for the purposes of the Act. Any objection to the making of such Order should be sent to the undersigned not later than the 16th April 1960. Dated this 18th day of March 1960. R. MiUard, Clerk of the Bucks County Council. County Hall, Aylesbury. THE FIRST SCHEDULE County District Road Section Bletchley Urban Shenley Road, C.9 From a point 400 yards north of the junction of Church Green Road to the junction with Trent Road. Buckingham Rural (Akeley) Buckingham-Towcester, From a point 284 yards west of junction of Leckhampstead A.413. Road to a point 210 yards north of junction with road to Duck End. Newport Pagnell Rural (Bow Brickhill) Bow Brickhill-Woburn (a) From a point 397 yards east of the junction with Sands Road, B.557. Walton Road, C.40, eastwards for a distance of approxi- mately 450 yards and (b) from the junction with Church Hill, No.
    [Show full text]