DOCSLIB.ORG

East West Rail (Ewr) Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East West Rail (Ewr) Consultation FULL COUNCIL 5 MAY 2021 ITEM 8 EAST WEST RAIL CONSULTATION Summary: For the Council to comment on the East West Rail consultation by the deadline of 9 June 2021. The documents out for consultation are extensive and the report attempts to outline the issues relevant to the Walton area. Councillors are encouraged to read the wider documentation in respect of these proposals. 1.0 EAST WEST RAIL – PUBLIC CONSULTATION 1.1 East West Rail has released non-statutory consultation which will run until 9 June 2021. The consultation focusses on the following five key issues: 1.2 This report will attempt to address the section of rail line that will impact Walton. 2.0 CONSULTATION DOCUMENTS 2.1 The consultation website and full list of consultation documents can be found by visiting - https://eastwestrail.co.uk/consultation. The Consultation report can be found by visiting: https://eastwestrail-production.s3.eu-west- 2.amazonaws.com/public/EAS060_ConDoc_310321_Digital_MASTER-1.pdf 3.0 EAST WEST 3.1 East West Rail’s proposals would connect communities between Oxford and Cambridge, improving parts of the existing rail network – and building a new section of line. Most relevant to Milton Keynes is Section B which covers Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line, and improvements to the existing infrastructure, stations, and level crossings. 3.2 Concept 1 and Concept 2 - Consultation document pages 110-119 Concept 1 - Retain existing service (in a modified form) and introduce limited- stop Oxford – Cambridge services alongside it, calling at Woburn Sands and Ridgmont. Concept 2 - Provide a more frequent, faster service with some new and relocated stations and improved community access. New or Relocated Stations - Consultation document pages 121-122 Should concept 2 shown above be chosen, it would mean the relocation of Woburn Sands station and the closures of Fenny Stratford station and Bow Brickhill station. Expansion of Bletchley station - Consultation document pages 130-131 Network Rail was granted permission to expand Bletchley station with two new platforms (for trains to and from Oxford), and to create a new footbridge to link the new platforms with the rest of the station. A range of improvements are being considered to ensure the station is fit for the future such as an eastern entrance to the station, altering or replacing the current footbridge, providing step free access to platform 6 and enlarging the car park etc. Additional Track – Fenny Stratford - Consultation document pages 131-132 An additional second track is required between Bletchley and Fenny Stratford to increase capacity in the area. Two options are being considered: • Building new bridges next to the existing bridges to carry the new tracks, or • Replacing the existing bridges with wider bridges that would carry both tracks. Closure of all level crossings on the Marston Vale Line - Consultation document pages 134-159 The EWR Project would increase the number of trains beyond what was previously planned, and level crossings will need to be closed to ensure a safe and reliable service. The level crossings of relevance to Milton Keynes include Fenny Stratford (Simpson Road), Bow Brickhill (V10 Brickhill Street), Browns Wood, Pony, and all existing level crossings at Woburn Sands. 4.0 WCC COMMENTS TO DATE 4.1 Councillor Adam Chapman-Ballard and resident Stuart Copeland have made the following comments which the Council is requested to discuss. The comments will help to promote discussion at the Council meeting so that a Council response can be formulated and submitted to East West Rail by the required deadline: Overall: EWR are pushing hard for Concept 2 (relocation of stations so that EWR serves Bletchley, Woburn Sands, Ridgmont, Lidlington, Stewartby and BSJ. This would involve Woburn Sands station moving 700m westward (towards us to serve SE:MK). This option seems to make sense with 10 stations into 5 and a station residents can walk to that would take them to Bedford in 25 mins or Oxford in 45. Caldecotte A5D rail bridge: Needs to handle 2 lines of rail traffic not just the 1 it has today. Either will be a new bridge entirely next to the existing bridge, or total replacement of existing bridge with a new wider one. Level crossings: There are 31 on the whole line and EWR considering closing ALL of them. Network Rail already has permission to close 11 of them and EWR are looking to replace these with 16 to 19 bridges/tunnels. Affected in our area and adjacent: V10 Brickhill Street (no permission yet); Browns Wood (no permission yet); Pony (no permission yet); Woodley’s Farm (permission granted); Fisherman's Path (permission granted); Woburn Sands (no permission yet). EWR has recognise that the V10 crossing is a vital traffic link but maintain that in any event they will close it. There are 4 options to maintain cross railroad traffic. We should respond to the consultation to choose a sensible option for here, which will add pressure to the SEMK planning. Option 3 seems to be the most sensible (option 3 is “cars under, rail over) whereas option 2 is (“rail under, cars over”). Bow Brickhill (page 145 of the consultation document): Option 1: Bow Brickhill option 1 would involve a new road from Station Road roundabout to the south of the railway, to the Water Mill roundabout on Caldecotte Lake Drive. The new bridge over the railway would be to the west of the existing level crossing. Option 2: Bow Brickhill option 2 would provide a new road between Station Road and Tillbrook roundabout. There would be a new junction on Station Road, and a new exit would be added to Tillbrook roundabout. The new road bridge would go over the railway to the east of the existing roundabout. Option 3: Bow Brickhill option 3 would provide a new road between Station Road and Tillbrook roundabout. There would be a new junction on Station Road, and a new exit would be added to Tillbrook roundabout. The new railway would be on a bridge over that new road, to the east of the existing level crossing. Option 4: Bow Brickhill option 4 would provide a new road bridge over the railway immediately adjacent to the existing level crossing. Changes would need to be made to the junction between Brickhill Street and Caldecotte Lake Drive and the junction between Brickhill Street and Station Road. This could mean closing V10 Bow Brickhill Road for a period. Options 3 or 4 provides a strategic crossing to continue the V10 to the A5 roundabout. Browns Wood (page 149): EWR acknowledge that it is a foot crossing today and that SEMK might include V11 extension options. They say if V11 extension is given a more solid footing they will incorporate into their designs. WCC should push hard for this in SEMK to influence the EWR modelling. As it stands, this will remain as a pedestrian only crossing. Option 1 - stairs only overbridge (no accessibility) Option 2 - ramp and stairs overbridge Option 3 - underpass connecting from the middle of Holst Crescent and under the allotments, which will impact plotholders there but provide most mobility and future connectivity. Option 3 would feel appropriate for an urban extension. Pony (page 152 - connects OFP to bridleways south of the rail line.) This will remain as a pedestrian/bridleway only crossing. Option 1 - ramped bridge in existing site of crossing Option 2 - ramped bridge but slightly more east (away from properties) than it is today. Option 3 - underpass (at horse rider height), from the back of Davenport Lane, passing under the end of Beethoven Close and under the rail line. Option 3 would feel appropriate for an urban extension. Woodley's Farm: This is a private crossing and will be closed with no other solutions. Woburn Sands (page 155) Option 1 - WS existing level crossing closed, and a new road ("Woodley's Farm Road") built as a bridge over the line in the same place as Woodley's Farm existing crossing, which accommodates the newly relocated WS station, and emerges north out onto Newport Road, beyond Frosts towards the Wavendon Arms. South, it connects most of the way through WS towards the Swan on the West side. In addition, this option creates a footbridge over the railway line where the existing level crossing is. This option would make the north part of Woburn Sands a dead end as North South access over the line would begin at the underpass in the middle of the town. No impact for Walton here. Option 2 - pedestrian bridge in the same location as the existing Woodley's Farm crossing but leaving the existing Woburn Sands level crossing in place but having it closed for around 40 minutes per hour due to train movements. It would seem sensible to build the option 2 bridge, alongside the moved station as per the SE:MK movement framework. From the options published, it seems that consultation between Milton Keynes Council and EWR have not taken place in sufficient detail, and our interests are not being served by MKC. 4.2 Councillor Adam Chapman-Ballard attended a consultation event and had raised the following matters: • EWR options looked like they had not consulted with or listened to MKC, e.g., the BB crossing needing allocated land. • EWR did not appreciate the strategic nature of the V10. • EWR were solving crossings in silos and had not truly considered SEMK in a strategic context. EWR responded with the following: • The starting point is the closure of all level crossings (road, foot, horse) which is in line with a UK wide task as they represent the highest risk on the rail network. • EWR believe they will be building at least 16 bridges and 2 new stations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • December 2018
    Unitary Councillors Report December 2018 Appendix A Unitary Councillor Report (Snippets) Report from Cllr David Hopkins, Cllr Victoria Hopkins & Cllr Alice Jenkins – Representing Bow Brickhill at MK Council December 2018 Wavendon Properties - TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY WAVENDON PROPERTIES LIMITED LAND TWO THE EAST OF NEWPORT ROAD AND TO THE EAST AND WEST OF CRANFIELD ROAD AT WOBURN SANDS, BUCKINGHAM, MK17 8UH APPLICATION REF: 16/00672/OUT Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision • The Inspector recommended that the appeal be allowed and planning permission granted, subject to conditions. • For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State disagrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. He has decided to dismiss the appeal and refuse planning permission. DELEGATED DECISION - 20 NOVEMBER 2018 INTRODUCTION OF 20MPH SPEED RESTRICTIONS INTO NEW AND EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ESTATES. The Council Plan 2016 – 2020 sets out how Milton Keynes Council will work to achieve its ambitions for Milton Keynes and includes a Transport commitment to introduce 20mph speed limits into new estates and to support any community that requests a 20mph speed limit. Unitary Councillors Report December 2018 Snippets • Levante Gate – spoken with officers and no further contact from Guinness so I suggest this issue has been put on the back burner. • Blocked Gullies – residents in Bow Brickhill are naturally concerned by the fact that the guillies still appear blocked causing pooling and pedestrians risking getting soaked by passing vehicles. Carl Devereaux writes; The Gullies and Side entry kerb weirs where cleared as part of the whole of Bow Brickhill as requested by the Local Council September 2018 At the time it was requested to have Serco in to clear the excessive silt in the kerb lines in this location and the rest of the village.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Cycling Map a Map of the Redways and Other Cycle Routes in Milton Keynes
    MK Cycling Map A map of the Redways and other cycle routes in Milton Keynes www.getcyclingmk.org Stony Stratford A B C Little D Riv E Linford er Great O Nature Haversham Dovecote use Reserve Ouse Valley Park Spinney Qu e W en The H Grand Union Canal a A5 Serpentine te i E r g le L h a se Haversham a n u S Riv t O ne o er Grea Village School t r r e S e tr Burnt t e et Covert Sherington Little M Russell Linford 1 Stony Stratford Street Ouse Valley Park Park L Library i School St Mary and St Giles t t Lakelane l Ousebank C of E Junior School Co e lt L Spinney WOLVERTON s H i ol n m f MILL Road o Old W r Wolverton Ro olv Manor d ad Strat Tr ert ford Road on L ad i R Farm a Lathbury o n oad n R Slated Row i e n t t y Ouse Valley Park to STONY e School g R n e i o r r t Stantonbury STRATFORD a OLD WOLVERTON Haversham e L d h o S Lake y S n r Lake a d o W o n WOLVERTON MILL W d n Portfields e Lathbury a s e lea EAST W s R S s o E Primary School t House s tr R oa at e b C n fo r o hi u e r u ch n e d c rd ele o d The R r O rt u o y swo y H e Q ad n r y il t Radcliffe t l lv R h 1 a i n Lan 1 e v e e Ca School Wolverton A r er P r G Gr v L e eat e v Wyvern Ou a i n R M se Bury Field l A u k il d School l L e e i H din i l y gt a t s f le on A t al WOLVERTON MILL l o n e e G ve C Wolverton L r h G u a L a d venu Queen Eleanor rc i A SOUTH r h Library n n S C Primary School e A tr R Blackhorse fo e H1 at M y ee d - le t iv n r a y sb e Stanton REDHOUSE d o a u r Bradwell o Lake g d R r V6 G i a L ew y The r n Newport n n o g o e Low Park PARK a
    [Show full text]
  • Little Brickhill
    Little Brickhill Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Assessment Report Warren Farmhouse, Little Brickhill The Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project was carried out between 2008 and 2012 by Buckinghamshire County Council with the sponsorship of English Heritage and the support of Milton Keynes Council and Buckinghamshire District Councils © Buckinghamshire County Council and English Heritage 2012 Report produced by David Green All the mapping contained in this report is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100021529 (2012) All historic mapping contained in this report © Intermap Technologies Ltd All Historic Photographs are reproduced courtesy of the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies unless otherwise stated. Copies of this report and further information can be obtained from: Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Advisory and Compliance Service, Place Service, Buckinghamshire County Council County Hall Aylesbury Bucks HP20 1UY Tel: 01296 382656 Email: [email protected] Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 the Posse Comitatus, P
    THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 The Posse Comitatus, p. 632 THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE POSSE COMITATUS 1798 IAN F. W. BECKETT BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY No. 22 MCMLXXXV Copyright ~,' 1985 by the Buckinghamshire Record Society ISBN 0 801198 18 8 This volume is dedicated to Professor A. C. Chibnall TYPESET BY QUADRASET LIMITED, MIDSOMER NORTON, BATH, AVON PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY ANTONY ROWE LIMITED, CHIPPENHAM, WILTSHIRE FOR THE BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY CONTENTS Acknowledgments p,'lge vi Abbreviations vi Introduction vii Tables 1 Variations in the Totals for the Buckinghamshire Posse Comitatus xxi 2 Totals for Each Hundred xxi 3-26 List of Occupations or Status xxii 27 Occupational Totals xxvi 28 The 1801 Census xxvii Note on Editorial Method xxviii Glossary xxviii THE POSSE COMITATUS 1 Appendixes 1 Surviving Partial Returns for Other Counties 363 2 A Note on Local Military Records 365 Index of Names 369 Index of Places 435 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editor gratefully acknowledges the considerable assistance of Mr Hugh Hanley and his staff at the Buckinghamshire County Record Office in the preparation of this edition of the Posse Comitatus for publication. Mr Hanley was also kind enough to make a number of valuable suggestions on the first draft of the introduction which also benefited from the ideas (albeit on their part unknowingly) of Dr J. Broad of the North East London Polytechnic and Dr D. R. Mills of the Open University whose lectures on Bucks village society at Stowe School in April 1982 proved immensely illuminating. None of the above, of course, bear any responsibility for any errors of interpretation on my part.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish, Town Councils (PDF)
    Parish and town council submissions to the Milton Keynes Council electoral review. This PDF document contains 10 submissions from parish and town councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Gre gory, Eleanor Sent: 07 June 2012 13:59 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: FW: Number of councillors in Milton Keynes Unitary Council Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Re d From: Bradwell Parish Council [mailto: Sent: 06 June 2012 17:51 To: Reviews@ Subject: Number of councillors in Milton Keynes Unitary Council We are Bradwell Parish Council in Milton Keynes. We are responding to your request asking how many borough councillors there should be on Milton Keynes Council following your boundary review. This parish council is of the opinion that the number of councillors should increase from the present 51 to 54 when the new boundaries are established. Regards Harold Atkins Clerk to Bradwell Parish Council, 2 08/06/2012 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Gre gory, Eleanor Sent: 07 June 2012 14:07 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: FW: Electoral Review Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Re d From: Parish Council - Parish Manager [mailto: Sent: 07 June 2012 12:33 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review Stantonbury Parish Council met last night and wish to respond to the Electoral Review as follows: No, 51 Councillors is not enough for an expanding city.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology in Bedfordshire
    490000 500000 510000 520000 530000 Stow Longa Great Hemingford Harrowden JURASSIC 0 Brampton 0 Covington Abbots 0 Hargrave 0 0 LIMESTONE, GODMANCHESTER 0 0 Chelveston 0 7 7 2 2 SANDSTONE, Caldecott Lower Dean A14 SILTSTONE AND Shelton Tilbrook Grafham (T) MUDSTONE Geology in Bedfordshire Upper Dean Kimbolton A Buckden 5 1 Yelden Stonely Offord Cluny 9 Perry 3 RUSHDEN Offord D'Arcy Hilton Wilby Newton Bromswold Melchbourne Swineshead Diddington Irchester Great Little Pertenhall Great Staughton ) Doddington Wymington (T Staughton Highway Papworth 5 Southoe 4 Wymington St Agnes A Graveley Farndish Papworth Great Paxton JURASSIC Knotting Everard Keysoe MUDPoSdiTngOtoNn E, Riseley Little Wollaston Little Paxton Knotting Staughton Toseland Yelling SILTSTONE, A6 Green Hail Weston Strixton LIMEHSinTwiOckNE AND Souldrop Lower End SANDSTONE Keysoe Row Caxton 0 Staploe Duloe 0 0 Gibbet 0 0 Grendon ST NEOTS 0 0 ) Croxton 0 6 A 428(T Eltisley 6 2 Sharnbrook 2 Eaton Socon A Eynesbury Easton Maudit Bozeat Bolnhurst 1 Thurleigh Colmworth ( Bletsoe T JURASSIC ) SANDSTONE, Odell Felmersham JURASSIC MUDSTONE, LIMESTONE Wyboston Abbotsley Duck's Cross AND Milton Ernest SILTSTONE AND Chawston Great 9 Colesden Gransden 0 Pavenham SANDSTONE 5 ARGILLACEOUS Little A Wilden Gransden ROCKS Ravensden Roxton Waresley Warrington West End Tempsford Lavendon Stevington A421(T) Oakley Salph Church End Cold Clapham Renhold End Brayfield Turvey A428 Great Barford Gamlingay A 6 Newton (T Blossomville ) Hatley St Olney Clifton Bromham Blunham Everton Reynes George East 0
    [Show full text]
  • Stantonbury Ecumenical Partnership St Mary Magdalene, Willen Easter
    Stantonbury Ecumenical Partnership St Mary Magdalene, Willen Easter Day Sunday 5 April Today 6.30am Dawn Service at St James New Bradwell 8.30am Holy Communion with Rev Paul Smith 9.30am Morning Worship with Margaret Moakes. After the service the Well has invited us to join them for Tea, Coffee, Cake and an Easter Egg hunt. Banns of Marriage are being called today for Alex Elliott and Sally Evans . This week: Tuesday 7th April 10am Interment of ashes of Sonia Miles RIP 7.30 for 7.45 pm: Stantonbury Ecumenical Partnership Annual meetings (incorporating Anglican Vestry and Parochial Church Meeting) at St Lawrence Church, Bradwell With the Rugby World Cup now just six months away (18 Sept - 31 Oct) and MK being one of the chosen venues for group games, representatives from each church are invited to an information and resources evening on Monday 22 June, 7.30-9.30pm at The Church of Christ the Cornerstone, central Milton Keynes. If there is one meeting where you or anyone from your church can find out about Christian initiatives, ideas and resources connected to the Rugby World Cup in MK - this is it! Notice Re: Pew cushion fund . If anyone would like to contr ibute towards the new cushions the appeal fund is still open to help us make up the shortfall. The total cost is £2,070; we have raised £1,175 to date so any further donations, which can still be placed in a marked envelope in the weekly collection or to one of the ministers. Cheques payable to “Willen Church” would be most welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Characterisation
    Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Historic Landscape Characterisation County Archaeological Service 2006 © 12XX design by Communications Design Team, a not for profit service, Buckinghamshire County Council 01296 382717 [email protected] a not for profit service, Buckinghamshire County Council 01296 382717 [email protected] Team, © 12XX design by Communications Design 37HH artwork version2.indd 2 25/9/06 11:16:05 Foreword Contents Buckinghamshire enjoys a rich and diverse Executive Summary Part 3: Using Historic landscape which has been shaped by Landscape Characterisation mankind over hundreds of years giving every Part 1: Overview of the Study Overview place its own distinctive character. Background Strategic Planning Today’s landscape reflects the endeavours Methodology Landscape Character Assessment of prehistoric farmers, medieval lords and Historic Landscape Types Green Infrastructure Planning peasants, the gentry’s garden designers and Development Control Victorian surveyors. This historic landscape Part 2: Historic Landscape Profiles Conservation Area Appraisal project has for the first time mapped Historic Buckinghamshire Landscape Management these changes across the whole historic Aylesbury Vale District Community and Education county providing information to enrich our Chiltern District Research appreciation of Buckinghamshire’s special Milton Keynes rural character. The report summarises South Bucks District Part 4: Accessing Historic Landscape the study’s conclusions and shows how Wycombe District Characterisation Data and its information can be used to care for this Landscape History Technical Appendices wonderful asset for the benefit of current and Change and Sensitivity future generations. We urge all organisations and individuals with a responsibility for Buckinghamshire’s landscape to take heed of this study when planning for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Wind Farm Non Technical Summary
    Milton Keynes Wind Farm Non Technical Summary Preface The Environmental Statement (ES) summarised here, has been prepared in support of a planning application submitted to Milton Keynes Council (the “Council”) in August 2006 for the Milton Keynes Wind Farm (the “Proposal”). The ES has been prepared and compiled by E4environment Ltd (E4e), an independent environmental consultancy, on behalf of MK Windfarm Ltd (as the Applicant) and Your Energy Ltd (as the Developer). The Proposal is on farmland comprising Petsoe Manor Farm, 2.5km east of the village of Emberton, and is for the purpose of generating electricity from wind energy. The ES is presented in three main volumes, namely: Volume 1 – Non Technical Summary The non technical summary (NTS) presents a summary of the Proposal, its likely environmental impacts and proposed mitigation. Volume 2 – Written Statement main text The written statement comprises: • An introduction and description of the Applicant/Developer and the scoping and consultation process; • The reasons for the site selection and a description of the Proposal. Then for each environmental issue identified through the scoping and consultation process the following is provided: • A description of the prevailing baseline conditions; • An assessment of the likely affects of the Proposal during construction and operation; • The mitigation measures proposed to avoid, minimise or compensate for possible adverse environmental effects. Volume 3 – Figures Volume 3 comprises the figures which show the site location, site layout, wind farm construction details, landscape character, photomontages, wireframes, and maps exhibiting the zone of visual influence (ZVI), sites of ecological and archaeological significance, and noise monitoring locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Codes
    PAGE: 1 DETAILS OF DECISIONS MADE WEEK BEGINNING 2nd May 2005 Decision Codes AGRAPP Agricultural Notification – Approved PD Permitted development (Planning Permission Not Required) AGRPPR Agricultural Notification – PEAVNZ Advert consent with standard conditions Planning Permission Required ALLOW Appeal Allowed PER Permitted APPWD Appeal Withdrawn PERLBZ Listed Building consent CATREE No objection to works to tree in Conservation Area PHEDGZ Hedgerow can be removed CSS Called in by the Secretary of State for decision PRESMZ Approval of reserved matters DEEMD Hazardous Substance Deemed Consent PTALLW Appeal allowed in part DISMIS Appeal Dismissed PTCON Permit works to tree in CA HEDGN Hedgerow Notice Not Required PTPOZ Tree preservation order consent HZPER Hazardous Substances Approval RCONAZ Conservation area consent refusal LAWFUL Lawful Use/Development READVZ Advert consent refused LEGAL Subject to a legal Agreement REF Refused NCAD Negative certificate of appropriate development REFLBZ Listed Building consent refused NDET Appeal RETURN Invalid application returned NOELB No objections Ecclesiastical L.B RHEDGZ Hedgerow to be retained NOOBJ No objections raised Circ. 18/84 or 14/90 RTCON Trees in CA objections/split decision NPW Application not proceeded with RTPOZ Tree preservation order consent refused PANRQ Prior approval not required SOSA Approved by Secretary of State PAREQ Prior approval required SPLITZ Advert split decision PAREQA Prior approval required and approved TCASPL Split response to trees in CA notification PAREQR Prior
    [Show full text]
  • TRADES. [ B::Ckingijam· HIRE
    ~330 SHO TRADES. [ B::CKINGijAM· HIRE. SHlRT & CoLLA& MANUFRS.-contd. Burrows George, Iver, Uxbridge Fleet Mrs. A. The Common, Amersha.m Robinson & Cleaver J.imited (of Belfastj, Burrows John, 17 Mitre st. Buckingham Flint Mrs. Sarah, Akeley, Buckingham 156 to 170 Regent street w (T N 1070 Butcher Mrs Charles,Broughton, Newport Floyd Mrs. Elizabeth, .105 Newport road, Gerrard; TA "Linloom, London") Pagnell New Bradwell, Wolverton & 101 & 102 Cheapside, London E c; Butler G. 197 Gordon rd. High Wycombe FloydJ. Geu. Lousley row.PrincesRisboro' & 22 Church street, Liverpool ; factories. Butler William J ames, Green lane, Foster J. 15 Chiltern st. W a.ltcm,Aylesbury Banbridge, eo. Down & Belfast, Ireland Datchet, Windsor Foulks James, 2 Vicarage road, Brad- Caple Thos. Shenley Brk. end. Bletchley well, \Volverton Carr Richard, Dean street, .Marlow Fowle•· William, 2 Queen's road,Chesham SHOPKEEPERS. Causby Miss E.Winchendon Low.Aylesbry Fox Miss E. 75 Germain street, Chesham Adams Albert, 31 School street, New Caves Arth. Jas. 44 Jersey rd. Wolverton Foxley W. London rd.Loughton,Bletchley Bradwell, Wolverton Chamberlain T. Bow Brickhill, Bletchley Francis Mrs. A. 7 Russell st.E'tonyStratfrd Adams George, Chackmore, Buckingham Chambers Mrs. E. Ledger's road, Slough Francis W. T.33 Victoria st.HighWycmbe Adams George, Uxbridge road, Slough Chappell Mrs. S. Stewkley, Leighton Bzzrd Franklin Frank, 79 New street, Aylesbury Admans P. G. 27 Diamond road, Slough Cheshire Alfd. E. North Marston, Winslow French Jn. Wm. Green la.Datchet,Windsr Ager Harry, 10 Tickford st.NewportPgnll Child Herbert, High st. Chalvey, Slough French S. 1 Brocas stmet, Eton, Wir,uisor Ager Mrs.
    [Show full text]