DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations Digital Library System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations Digital Library System UNITED NATIONS THIRTY-SEVENTH YEAR MEETING: 23 FEBRUARY 1982 CONTENTS Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/233 1) . , , . , . , . , , , , . , . , . Expression of thanks to the outgoing President , . , . , , . , . , . , . Adoption of the agenda , , , . , . , , , , . , . , . , , , . , . The situation in the Middle East: (n) Resolution 498 (1981); (b) Special report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (S/14869); (c) Letter dated 16 February 1982 from the Permanent Representative of Leb- anon to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/14875). , , . , , , , . , , , , #.. , . , . , , . , . + . SiPV.233 1 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters com- bined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/ . .) are normally published in quarterly Suppleuwnts of the @ffkk~l Records of tkc Seccrrity Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which infor- mation about it is given. bl. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of Rcsolrrtiorzs trrd Decisions of the Security Council. The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative on that date. 2331st MEETING Held in New York on Tuesday, 23 February 1982, at 3.30 p.m. President : Sir Anthony PARSONS (United Kingdom the representative of Lebanon in which he requests of Great Britain and Northern Ireland). to be invited to participate in the discussion of the item on the Council’s agenda. In accordance with P,?r.ssrzt: The representatives of the following States: the usual practice, I propose, with the consent of the China, France, Guyana, Ireland, Japan, Jordan, Council, to invite him to participate in the discussion, Panama, Poland, Spain, Togo, Uganda, Union of without the right to vote, in conformity with the rele- Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great vant provisions of the Charter and rule 37 of the pro- Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of Amer- visional rules of procedure. ica %Zaire. At the invitbtion of the President, Mr. Tm’ni (Leb- Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2331) anon) took n place at the Council table. 1. Adoption of the agenda 3. The PRESIDENT: I should also like to inform the Council that I have received a letter dated 23 Feb- 2. The situation in the Middle East: ruary 1982 from the representative of Jordan [S/14878] Resolution 498 (198 1); which reads as follows: Special report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon “I have the honour to request the Security Coun- (S/ 14869); cil to extend an invitation to the representative of Letter dated 16 February 1982 from the Per- the Palestine Liberation Organization to participate manent Representative of Lebanon to the in the Council’s consideration of the item ‘The situa- United Nations addressed to the President of tion in the Middle East’, in accordance with the the Security Council (S/14875) Council’s usual practice.” The meeting nm called to order- at 4 pm. 4. The proposal by the representative of Jordan is not made pursuant to rule 37 or rule 39 of the provi- Expression of thanks to the outgoing President sional rules of procedure but, if approved by the Council, the invitation to participate in the discussion I. The PRESIDENT: As this is the first formal would confer on the Palestine Liberation Organiza- meeting of the Security Council for the month of tion (PLO) the same rights of participation as those February, I should like, on behalf of the Council, to conferred on a Member State pursuant to rule 37. express our thanks to the President for the month of January, Mr. Oleg Troyanovsky, the Permanent 5. Does any member of the Council wish to speak Representative of the Union of Soviet Socialist Repub- on this proposal? lics to the .United Nations, for the great skill, wisdom and courtesy with which he conducted our affairs 6. Mrs. KIRKPATRICK (United States of Amer- last month. ica): First, I should like to take this opportunity to congratulate you, Sir, on your accession to the office Adoption of the agenda of President of the Council and to thank the repre- sentative of the Soviet Union for his service during the past month. The situation in the Middle East: (a) Resolution 498 (1981); 7. The United States delegation has on many occa- -(b) Special report of the Secretary-General on the sions explained the reasons why we oppose the special United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (S/14869); procedure that appears to give the PLO the same (c) Letter dated 16 February 1982 from the Perma- rights of participation in the proceedings of the Coun- nent Representative of Lebanon to the United cil as if it represented a State. The PLO is not a Nations addressed to the President of the Security State; it is a political movement which presents its Council (S/14875) claims in the name of a collectivity whose members live under various political jurisdictions. No formula 2. The PRESIDENT: I should like to inform mem- justifies this departure from the rules of procedure bers of the Council that I have received a letter from of the Council. The formula proposed seems to us to ‘P seek without basis to enhance the prestige, and indeed cia] report of the Secretary-Gened Cln Ihe Unifd to falsify the status, of those to whom it is directed. Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (LJNIFILl, ~HMI document S/14875, which contains the text Of a lettel 8. We have always stressed that we have no objec- dated 16 February from the repl-e%XltZltiVe Of Let,- tion to the Council’s hearing the PLO representatives; anon to the President of the Council. indeed, we have no objection to the Council’s hearing the representatives of any political group with a stake 14. The first speaker is the repl‘CSeIlkltiVe of IXll- in questions discussed here. But we consider that this anon, on whom I now call. can be accomplished legally only on the traditional basis of rule 39, which empowers the Council to grant 15. Mr. TUBNI (Lebanon): Of the now innurner:~hlc hearings to persons speaking on behalf of non-govern- debates held by the Council on South Lebanon in the mental entities. past few years, none resembles the present one: it is unique in that there is no mandate of UNIFIL to 9. Accordingly, we ask, Mr. President, that you renew, no breach of a cease-fire, no attacks on Beirut. put to the vote the terms of this proposed invitation. or even on the “area of operations”, no sudden fitire- The United States will vote no. up of violence. And yet the stage is set, aS if WC Wel‘L: nearing a major showdown. IO. The PRESIDENT: If no other member of the Council wishes to speak at this stage, I shall take it 16. The Council, when it met on 18 December- 11)8I that the Council is ready to vote on the proposal by [232&h meeting], ruled in its resolution 498 (198 1) thltt Jordan. it would A Ivtc II’~.S taken by show of hands. ‘&review, within two months, the situation :IS iI whole in the light of the letter of the Permanent I/l.fil~*orlr: China, Guyana, Ireland, Jordan, Panama, Representative of Lebanon to the Secretary-C&n- Poland, Spain, Togo, Uganda, Union of Soviet Socia- eral, dated 14 December 1981” [S/147021. list Republics, Zaire 17. Hence, our debate today should take place in the d,qairzst: United States of America atmosphere of intellectual serenity and politieul wisdom which we were denied in the past. Ahstaining: France, Japan, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 18. This, Mr. President, is, we believe, whirt prompted you to give us all, since you started your consultations on 16 February, time to reflect und exchange views on the best possible course to follow if we are to avoid another crisis and enable UNIFII. At the in\Vitrrtiorl of the President, Mr. Terzi (Pales- to perform the peace-keeping mission entrusted to it ti,ic Libcrotion Organizntion) took a place at the side by the Council nearly four years ago Irrsolrrtio~r ~2.5 qf thr Corrmil chmher. (1978)]; 11. The PRESIDENT: I should like to inform the 19. We have indeed been reassured not only by the Council that I have received a letter dated 23 February style and perceptive spirit with which you conducted 1982 from the representative of Jordan [S/14883], which those consultations, but, more generally, by your reads as follows: presence in the Chair this month. While congratulatiJlg You, therefore, as is the custom, on the assumption of “I have the honour to request the Security Coun- Your responsibilities, I would add that your intimate cil to invite Mr. Clovis Maksoud, Permanent Ob- and profound knowledge of Middle Eastern ques- server of the League of Arab States, to participate tions, not to mention Your long record of objectivity in the consideration by the Council of the question and wisdom in the Council, is a guarantee-if any entitled ‘The situation in the Middle East’, in accord- were needed-of enlightened leadership and, WC ance with rule 39 of the provisional rules of pro-’ dare hope, a successful conclusion as well. cedure.” 20. May 1 also say, since it is now publicly known 12. If I hear no objection I shall take it that the Coun- that Your are about to retire from the United Nations cil agrees to accede to this request.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • We Have Names, We Have a Homeland the National Campaign to Retrieve War Victims and Unravel the Fate of Those Missing
    We have Names, We have a Homeland The National Campaign to Retrieve War Victims and Unravel the Fate of Those Missing Jerusalem Legal Aid and The National Campaign to Retrieve War Victims Human Rights Center and Unravel the Fate of Those Missing We have Names, We have a Homeland Second edition Editorial Team: Salem Khilleh – National Campaign to Retrieve War Victims and Unravel the Fate of Those Missing, General Coordinator Issam Aruri – Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center, Director Ikhlas Quran – Ju’beh, JLAC Husssein Abu Arra, JLAC Fatima AbdulKarim, JLAC Attorney Haitham Al-Khatib, JLAC Stories by: Samih Mohsin Faleh Atawneh Mulki Suleiman Issam Aruri Khaled Batrawi Ghassan AbdelHamid Ghazi Bani Odeh Momen Adel Awadallah Laila AlModallal Issa Qaraqe’ Tayseer Mheisen Mohannad AbdelHamid Tahseen Elayan Khaled Sabarneh Translation Editing and Proofreading Carol Mukarker Issam Aruri, Samih Mohsin and Salem Khilleh (Arabic) Fatima AbdulKarim, Mai Farsakh, Nadia Warrayat and Elizabeth Utting (English) Cover Photo Book Photos Fadi Arouri Fatima AbdulKarim, Hussain Abu Arra, Atef Safadi and Fadi Arouri Special thanks to Volunteers Suhair Shaarawi Samira Jabaly Reema Taweel Jihan Mansour Texts signed with their own writer’s names do not necessarily reflect the view of Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center 2 For further information, contact: The National Campaign to Retrieve War Victims and Unravel the Fate of Those Missing Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center Ramallah, AlMasayef Kamal Nasser str., Millennium building 6th floor P.O Box: 1560 Ramallah T: +97022987981 F: +97022987982 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3 Dedication- First edition When one’s hopes are bitter-sweet… During the composition of this book, Mohamed Issa Ishqukani (Abu Issa) the father of the late ‘Amer Ishqukani (who was killed on may 25, 2002 and whose body remains were detained in Israeli Custody) passed away on October 28 of 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegation for Relations with the Mashreq Countries
    Delegation for Relations with the Mashreq Countries 5th EP-Jordan interparliamentary meeting 25 April-2 May 2008 Draft report by Ms Béatrice PATRIE, Chair of the delegation CR\740179EN.doc PE405.694 EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................3 1.1. Previous meetings....................................................................................3 1.2. Consolidation visit...................................................................................3 1.3. Assessing the Euro-Jordanian and Euro-Mediterranean Partnerships ............................................................................................3 1.4. Tense regional context ............................................................................4 2. ISSUES ADDRESSED DURING THE VISIT..................................................4 2.1. Jordan in the eye of the storm ...............................................................4 2.1.1 The resonance of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict .........................4 2.1.2 A problematic regional context.....................................................5 2.1.3 A voice of tolerance and moderation............................................5 2.2. The Iraqi refugee crisis...........................................................................6 2.2.1. The Delegation’s previous activities.............................................6 2.2.2. Facts and figures about the situation in Jordan ...........................6 2.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser
    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of a National Institution Edited by Ida Audeh
    Birzeit University: The Story of a National Institution Edited by Ida Audeh Birzeit University: The Story of a National Institution Editor: Ida Audeh All rights reserved. Published 2010 Birzeit University Publications Birzeit University: The Story of a National University Editor: Ida Audeh Arabic translation: Jumana Kayyali Abbas Photograph coordinator: Yasser Darwish Design: Palitra Design Photographs: Birzeit University archives; Institute of Community and Public Health archives Printing: Studio Alpha ISBN 978-9950-316-51-5 Printed in Palestine, 2010 Office of Public Relations P.O. Box 14 Birzeit, Palestine Tel.: + 97022982059 Fax: +97022982059 Email: [email protected] www.birzeit.edu Contents Foreword Chapter 4. An Academic Biography Nabeel Kassis ............................................................................................... VII Sami Sayrafi ...................................................................................................35 Exploring the Palestinian Landscape, by Kamal Abdulfattah ................... 40 Preface “The Past Is in the Present”: Archeology at Birzeit, by Lois Glock ........... 40 Hanna Nasir ..................................................................................................IX My Birzeit University Days, 1983-85, by Thomas M. Ricks ...................... 42 Acknowledgments .........................................................................................XI Chapter 5. Graduate Studies at Birzeit George Giacaman .........................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Fake Realities: Assassination and Race in Popular Culture Kevin Marinella
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Master’s Theses and Projects College of Graduate Studies 2018 Fake Realities: Assassination and Race in Popular Culture Kevin Marinella Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses Part of the Criminology Commons Recommended Citation Marinella, Kevin. (2018). Fake Realities: Assassination and Race in Popular Culture. In BSU Master’s Theses and Projects. Item 56. Available at http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/56 Copyright © 2018 Kevin Marinella This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Running Head: FAKE REALITIES: ASSASSINATION AND RACE IN POPULAR CULTURE 1 Fake realities: Assassination and race in popular culture A Thesis Presented by KEVIN MARINELLA Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies Bridgewater State University Bridgewater, Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Criminal Justice MAY 2018 Fake realities: Assassination and race in popular culture 2 Fake realities: Assassination and race in popular culture A Thesis Presented by KEVIN MARINELLA MAY 2018 Approved as to style and content by: Signature:______________________________________________________________ Dr. Wendy Wright, Chair Date: Signature:______________________________________________________________ Dr. Carolyn Petrosino, Member Date: Signature:______________________________________________________________ Dr. Jamie Huff, Member Date: Fake realities: Assassination and race in popular culture 3 ABSTRACT Since the September 11th, 2011 terrorist attacks the United States had been involved in conflicts across the globe. These conflict have given rise to the use of target killing, commonly known as assassination as a way to eliminate enemies of the United States. A majority of those killed are of Middle-Eastern descent and/or are followers of Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Boycotts Against Israel and the Question of Academic Freedom in American Universities in the Arab World Sami Hermez and Mayssoun Soukarieh
    Back to Volume Four Contents Boycotts against Israel and the Question of Academic Freedom in American Universities in the Arab World Sami Hermez and Mayssoun Soukarieh How can we understand academic freedom in the Arab world today when it comes to the question of Palestine and Israel? What does the concept mean, practically speaking, for American universities in the region? And how should it be deployed? These universities operate, today, in the context of a colonial present1 and serve to promote values not dissimilar to those imagined by American missionaries in the 1820s. Instead of an explicit resort to discourses of backwardness, or a mention of native defects,2 American university presidents today speak of promoting values that are “uniquely American,” such as “a sense of mutual respect, tolerance for people of very diverse backgrounds” or solving problems “without recourse to violence.”3 One can only assume that this implies that such values do not exist where these universities are operating. What kind of agendas, then, does academic freedom promote when invoked by American universities in what we may call a neocolonial context? How might it be employed for or against collective struggle in the region? And what role can such universities play in advancing or being obstacles to an academic boycott of Israel? The Arab-Israeli conflict has meant that, with few exceptions, most Arab countries have not had diplomatic relations with Israel. This state-imposed Arab boycott has provided legal Copyright American Association of University Professors, 2013 AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom 2 Volume Four protection as one line of defense against the normalization of Israel’s ongoing violations of international law against the Palestinian people, but underlying this is an even more crucial ethical claim against any dealing with Israel, whether economic, cultural, or, for our purposes, academic.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine Joint Country Programme Evaluation Report
    PALESTINE DCA/NCA JOINT COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION 2016-2020 Final Evaluation Report (Second Draft) 21 February 2021 Arab World for Research and Development (AWRAD) Al-Masayef., Kamal Nasser St., Building # 43. P.O. Box: 2238, Ramallah – Palestine Joint Country Programme- Palestine| 2016-2020 Evaluation Report Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 3 Evaluation Recommendations .......................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 11 2. Overview of Evaluation ............................................................................................... 12 3. Context of intervention............................................................................................... 15 4. Evaluation methodology ............................................................................................. 19 5. Findings and results ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Palestinian Bedouin Communities
    Planning or Forced Transfer? The Case of Palestinian Bedouin Communities Jerusalem Legal Aid & Human Rights Center Ahmad Heneiti How to Contact Us \ Millennium Building, 6th Floor Kamal Nasser Street Tel: +970 2 2987981 Fax: +970 2 2987982 \ ] lbn Batoota Street 14 Jerusalem Tel: +972 2 6272982 Fax: +972 2 6264770 \ Nablus Commerce Chamber Building, 5th] Faisal Street, Telefax: +970 9 2386550 \\ Abu Ghanem Building, 2nd] Tel: +970 9 2517101 Fax: +970 9 2511701 www.jlac.ps [ The contents of this study do not necessarily represent the views of the donor4 Cover photo donated by: Fadi Aruri Planning or Forced Transfer? The Case of Palestinian Bedouin Communities Ahmad Heneiti Jerusalem Legal Aid & Human Rights Center - JLAC December 2014 Preface by JLAC This study is published by the Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center (JLAC) as part of its advocacy project for the support of Palestinian Bedouins, supported \ and social impacts of the forcible displacement plan, which targets Bedouin communities in the central West Bank and aims at grouping them in a new semi- refugee camps !"#$ For the purpose of conducting the study, the Center contracted the anthropological researcher, Ahmad Heneiti, who focused on the lifestyle, culture and livelihoods of the #%&' architecture pattern of these communities, as well as, conducted interviews with their representatives, economists, and agronomists, in addition to a literature Following the issuance of the draft research, a focus group workshop of selected communities affected by the plan was conducted with the participation of a number of '*# 2 #' ' " In addition to its chapters, the study includes a set of appendices, including the proceedings of the above mentioned workshop Moreover, a summary of a legal paper, # ' +.
    [Show full text]
  • Birzeit University, West Bank
    THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST STUDIES IMES CAPSTONE PAPER SERIES THE NEXT GENERATION: STUDENTS AND POLITICS AT BIRZEIT UNIVERSITY, WEST BANK STEPHANIE BREITSMAN SEREEN THAHIR MAY 2015 THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST STUDIES THE ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY © STEPHANIE BREITSMAN AND SEREEN THAHIR, 2015 1 Acknowledgements A number of people helped see our project to completion. We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Mubarak Awad for his guidance and invaluable wisdom regarding the Palestinian university landscape. We would also like to thank Dr. Marc Lynch and Dr. Shana Marshall for their academic feedback and support navigating the bureaucratic side of research. Additionally, without Kate Getz, we would have never been able to conduct our field research. Our week of field research in Palestine was fruitful and productive thanks to the generous support and encouragement from the students, staff, and faculty at Birzeit University. We specifically would like to thank Lubna Abdel Hadi and the Public Relations Office, Dr. Said Kalil and the Faculty of Law, Dr. Sonia Nimer, and the staff and students of the Birzeit University Student Council. Outside of the university, we would like to thank the staff of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research for their helpful input and comprehensive resources. Finally, we would like to thank our friends and family for their unconditional love and support through the highs and lows of this project. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Making of The
    THE MAKING OF THE PLO 1946: In May 1946, the first conference of Arab Kings and Presidents, according to the system of the League of Arab States, was held in Anshas near Cairo; the meeting decided: “Palestine is the heart of the Arab Group and the fate of Jerusalem is linked to the fate of the entire League of Arab States and what happens to the Arabs in Palestine affects all the Arab peoples… and the Arab countries and peoples have to protect the Arab features of Palestine”. 1948: Following the UN Partition Resolution 181,1947, the announcing of the end of the British Mandate, and the entry of the Arab troops into Palestine, the League of Arab States Political Commission decided on July 10, 1948, to establish a temporary Palestinian administration to manage the affairs of the Arab controlled territory. The first Palestinian conference was held in October 1948 in the presence of 90 figures representing the mayors of municipalities, heads of chambers of commerce, and representatives of national commissions and parties upon invitation by the Arab Higher Commission. The conference ratified the establishment of All-Palestine Government headed by Ahmad Hilmi Abdul Baqi; the members of the government consisted of the following: Jamal al-Husseini, Rajai al-Husseini, Awni Abdul Hadi, Akram Zuaiter, Dr. Hussein Fakhri al-Khalidi, Ali Hasna, Michel Abkarius, Yousef Sahyoun, and Amin Aqel. The conference decided that the flag of Palestine would be the flag of the Arab Revolt of 1916. Arab governments and the Arab League recognized the All-Palestine Government as soon as it was declared with the exception of Jordan.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday, August 1, 2009 Birzeit University, Kamal Nasser Lecture
    Saturday, August 1, 2009 Birzeit University, Kamal Nasser Lecture Hall 9:00 -10:00 Registration 10:00 -10:30 Opening session and welcoming notes Panel 1: Jerusalem and Politics Chair: Nasser Al-Qudwa , 10:30 - 10:50 The new US administration s policy towards Jerusalem and the question of Palestine Rashid Khalidi 10:50 - 11:10 European role and politics towards Jerusalem Joachim Paul 11:10 - 11:30 Arab role and policies towards Jerusalem Mahdi Abdul Hadi 11:30 - 11:50 The history of negotiating Jerusalem Ahmad Qurei 11:50 - 12:10 The media and Jerusalem: between objectivity and political commitment Walid Omary 12:10 - 12:40 Discussion 12:40 - 1:00 Coffee break Panel 2: Between law and demography Chair: Sahar Francis 1:00 - 1:20 Jerusalem in International Law Feras Milhem 1:20 - 1:40 Jerusalem under Israeli Law Usama Halaby 1:40 - 2:00 Stifling Palestinian Presence in Jerusalem Ahmad Rwaidy 2:00 - 2:30 Discussion 2:30 - 4:00 Lunch break Sunday August 2, 2009 Panel 3: Israeli plans for Jerusalem Chair: Juliet Tuma 9:30 - 9:45 The plan to Judaize Jerusalem Jad Isaac 9:45 - 10:00 Digging up Jerusalem and its environs Nazmi Al Jubeh 10:00 - 10:15 Colonizing plans for Jerusalem Khaleel Toufakji 10:15 - 10:30 The Israeli concept of Greater Jerusalem Jamal Juma’ 10:30 - 11:00 Discussion Panel 4: Right vs. Occupation’s law Chair: Nahla Asali 11:00 - 11:15 Discrimination in education against the Palestinians Sameer Jibreel 11:15 - 11:30 House demolition: a sign of the occupation policy in Jerusalem Yacoub Odeh 11:30 - 11:45 The economic realities
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War and Chinese Policy Toward the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1963–1975
    The Cold War and Chinese Policy toward the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1963–1975 ✣ Gangzheng She Introduction After implementing the Great Leap Forward for close to four years starting in 1958, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) gradually adjusted course. By 1962, the country had begun to recover from the disastrous consequences of this economic and social campaign. Along with the revitalization of the PRC’s domestic economy came the rehabilitation of Beijing’s interests in the world beyond the Communist bloc. Chinese officials reinterpreted the “Bandung Spirit” by arguing for the unity of African-Asian–Latin American peoples and their surging revolutionary struggles against imperialism to bring in “a new era of peace and social justice.”1 In contrast to Beijing’s earlier embrace of the “Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence” before and during the Bandung Conference, the PRC’s militant turn demonstrated its will to fight against U.S. “imperialism” and also marked a conspicuous divergence from the diplomatic strategy of the Soviet Union, Beijing’s erstwhile ally turned bitter adversary. In seeking to increase the PRC’s diplomatic presence around the globe, Chinese leaders devoted particular attention to the Arab world, a region they had only sporadically dealt with in the 1950s, mostly during the Suez Crisis of 1956 and the Lebanon crisis of 1958. ThedesiretocompetewiththeSovietUnionfortheThirdWorldin general and for the Arab countries in particular, together with the radicaliza- tion of China’s domestic politics, eventually induced the PRC to become the first non-Arab major power that substantially supported the Palestinian na- tional movement. An initial step was taken in May 1965 with Chinese diplo- matic recognition of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), roughly a year after its formation.
    [Show full text]