Wind Power: Your Questions Answered

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wind Power: Your Questions Answered Wind power: your questions answered Proven Energy Proven Getty Getty DID YOU KNOW? Many environmental organisations recognise the importance of wind power as an essential component of our strategy to fight climate change, including Natural England, the RSPB and WWF. Renewable UK has worked with these organisations to provide guidance on designated areas and wind developments. See page 19 for contact details. Global warming: time for action Climate change is the biggest and most urgent environmental threat we face. The greenhouse gases responsible are caused by human activity. The most important is carbon dioxide (CO2) which is produced when we burn fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas for energy. Rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are causing increases in global temperatures, leading to more severe weather patterns such as floods, droughts and storms, rising sea levels and threats to entire ecosystems. To avoid catastrophic climate change we must curb rising global emissions within the next 10 years. This means we need to About Friends of the Earth switch to forms of energy that do not produce CO2. In the UK around a third of our emissions of CO2 come from power stations which are producing electricity. Other emissions from these stations pollute the air we breathe and For more than 40 years we’ve seen that the contribute to acid rain which threatens wildlife. Our demand well-being of people and planet go hand for energy is higher than ever. Even if we make massive in hand – and it’s been the inspiration for improvements in energy efficiency, it’s vital that we find our campaigns. Together with thousands of cheap and clean ways of generating electricity to replace the people like you we’ve secured safer food and polluting forms of energy we currently use. water, defended wildlife and natural habitats, championed the move to clean energy and The time for action is now. We are already witnessing acted to keep our climate stable. Be a Friend changes to our climate. We have to cut emissions of CO2 of the Earth – see things differently. to avert catastrophe. We can achieve this by harnessing the natural, clean and inexhaustible energy sources Come and find out more atwww.foe.co.uk around us: the sun, wind and waves. 2 3 A modern 2.5MW turbine at a reasonable site will generate 6.5 million units of electricity each year, enough to meet the annual needs of more than 1,400 households. Friends of the Earth supports the development of wind power in the UK. We must invest in renewable energy like wind power to offset the threat of climate change and to help avoid new nuclear power stations, both of which threaten huge environmental problems for the generations that succeed us. We want to encourage wind farms which are appropriately sited, well designed and locally supported. Friends of the Earth believes the debate about wind power must be balanced and informed. This booklet answers some common questions about wind power and puts into perspective the arguments often used to oppose wind developments. Image Source Good Energy Wind power as a source of DID YOU KNOW? There is no safe level of exposure to nuclear renewable energy radiation. Highly radioactive toxic waste Electricity generation from the wind is the best-developed of from nuclear reactors will the newer renewable energy technologies and it is available last for tens of thousands now. Wind power relies on relatively simple mechanical of years, and nobody knows how to store it processes, once built the running costs are very low, and it safely. Nuclear power has benefited from recent technological advances in the plants are also potentially aeronautics industry. The fuel is free and inexhaustible and catastrophic terrorist there are no waste products. This means it can compete with targets. Friends of the Earth believes nuclear the cost of energy based on conventional fossil fuels. And power is not the solution as oil and gas prices continue to rise, wind power can only to cutting CO2 emissions. become more competitive. As well as the urgent environmental need for The UK has the greatest potential for wind power in Europe, clean energy, wind power but we have been slow to exploit it. Germany and Denmark has many social and lead the way. Wind energy could be providing almost a economic benefits. Wind quarter of our electricity needs by 2020. As the UK is now a power creates new jobs, often in areas of high net importer of oil and gas, wind offers additional benefits in unemployment. terms of secure energy supplies. 4 5 Your questions answered DID YOU KNOW? Isn’t wind power expensive DID YOU KNOW? The Committee on Climate and heavily subsidised? The UK is the windiest Change concluded that country in Europe but the best way for the UK to No. The cost of generating electricity from the wind has lags behind many of our Will building wind farms reduce its carbon emissions fallen dramatically over the past few years. Wind power European neighbours in on the scale needed is to can now produce electricity at a cheaper price than nuclear developing this resource. help prevent global warming? make electricity generation By the end of 2011 virtually carbon-free by power in the UK. Energy from the wind will become even Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most important of the Germany had installed 2030. But overall electricty cheaper in the future as greater experience is gained in more than 29 GW capacity greenhouse gases which are changing our climate. demand is likely to rise, as manufacturing and developing this relatively new technology. of wind power, and Spain If we are to avoid dangerous levels of climate change we it is used more for heating more than 21 GW. The UK must cut our CO2 emissions by 80-90 per cent by 2050. and transport. Electric When the full costs of the environmental damage caused was well behind with only vehicles are a useful form by fossil fuels and nuclear power are taken into account, 6.5 GW. Wind power is a clean, renewable form of energy, which of energy storage, as wind power is an even better buy. For example, it has been Other countries generate during operation produces virtually no carbon dioxide. It batteries can be charged at night when other estimated that if the cost of environmental damage were a far higher proportion of also emits no sulphur dioxide, the cause of acid rain. While demands on the grid are included, the price of electricity from coal would be three their electricity from wind. Denmark leads the way some emissions of these gases will take place during the low but wind turbines are times higher than electricity from the wind. The full costs design, manufacture, transport and erection of wind turbines, still generating. with almost 26 per cent of nuclear power, including dealing with highly-radioactive of its annual electricity enough electricity is generated from a wind farm within a waste and decommissioning of old plants, are still not consumption coming few months to compensate for these emissions. When wind included in the price of electricity after decades of operating from wind power, with Spain and Portugal each farms are dismantled (usually after 20 years of operation) stations in the UK, and the nuclear industry is still dependent they leave no legacy of pollution for future generations. approaching 16 per cent of on massive Government subsidy. annual consumption from this source. The cost to the consumer of supporting the initial Can wind farms produce development of wind power in the UK has been very small. But after a slow start the UK is beginning to take its wind significant amounts of electricity? The Non-Fossil Fuel Levy, set up at the time of electricity resource more seriously; privatisation, supported all non-fossil fuel sources of electricity generated from Although there are vast quantities of wind energy available, electricity: nuclear power and renewable energy. However, the wind rose by more than harnessing the wind involves capturing energy that is half in 2011, to just over 4 almost 90 per cent of that subsidy went to the nuclear per cent. relatively diffuse in the environment. Critics claim large, Getty industry. The Government has replaced this arrangement centralised power stations are more efficient, and that wind with the Renewables Obligation, which requires electricity power will never be able to replace them. suppliers to provide up to 20 per cent of their electricity An individual turbine might not contribute much on a from a variety of renewable sources by 2020. The cost of national scale, but together many can make a huge the Renewables Obligation made up about 1 per cent of our difference. The UK Government calculates that onshore wind household energy bills in 2010. could theoretically meet 80 per cent of our current electricity demand, and that the offshore resource could supply 10 times this amount. More conservative estimates, taking into account things like land availability, suggest an achievable figure of about 70 per cent of current electricity generation from on- and offshore wind by 2030. 6 7 Is electricity from the wind reliable? DID YOU KNOW? If we saved more energy, we It’s true that wind turbines only operate when the wind Wind energy coincides wouldn’t need wind power, would we? blows. However, the UK is the windiest country in Europe well with periods of However much we improve the way we use energy, we are so we have a large resource waiting to be used. Less windy peak electricity demand.
Recommended publications
  • CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Author: Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 Published by: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford (Surrey) GU2 7XH, United Kingdom http://www.surrey.ac.uk/CES Publication date: 2000 © Centre for Environmental Strategy, 2007 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and not of the Centre for Environmental Strategy. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publishers cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials. This publication and its contents may be reproduced as long as the reference source is cited. ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION STUDY ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Paper prepared as background to the Study Renewable Energy Sources March 1998 Dr Tim Jackson* and Dr Ragnar Löfstedt Centre for Environmental Strategy University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 5XH E-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the thinking of the Royal Commission. Any queries about the paper should be directed to the author indicated * above. Whilst every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accurate transposition of the written reports onto the website, the Royal Commission cannot be held responsible for any accidental errors which might have been introduced during the transcription. Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Renewable Energy Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays? Consumer Attitudes to the Growth of Levies to Fund Environmental and Social Energy Policy Objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus
    Who Pays? Consumer attitudes to the growth of levies to fund environmental and social energy policy objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus Consumer Focus is the statutory Following the recent consumer and consumer champion for England, Wales, competition reforms, the Government Scotland and (for postal consumers) has asked Consumer Focus to establish Northern Ireland. a new Regulated Industries Unit by April 2013 to represent consumers’ interests in We operate across the whole of the complex, regulated markets sectors. The economy, persuading businesses, Citizens Advice service will take on our public services and policy-makers to role in other markets from April 2013. put consumers at the heart of what they do. We tackle the issues that matter to Our Annual Plan for 2012/13 is available consumers, and give people a stronger online, consumerfocus.org.uk voice. We don’t just draw attention to problems – we work with consumers and with a range of organisations to champion creative solutions that make a difference to consumers’ lives. For regular updates from Consumer Focus, sign up to our monthly e-newsletter by emailing [email protected] or follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/consumerfocus Consumer Focus Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8 Background ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy and Biomass
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory Global (International) Energy Policy and Biomass Ralph P. Overend National Renewable Energy Laboratory California Biomass Collaboration – First Annual Forum January 8th , 2004 Sacramento, CA. NREL/PR-510-35561 Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Understanding Policy • Policies are applied against uncertain futures! • Can be – EXPLICIT as in having an “Energy Policy” •OR – IMPLICIT derived from the sum total of previous actions • Biomass Specific Policy – At the Intersection of several policies and jurisdictions • Energy • Environment • Land Use – Agriculture – Forestry – Rural Development • Urban •ZEN Rules – not having an Explicit policy can still be an Energy Policy! – However well meaning a policy – there is a law of unintended consequences World TPES 2000 (Total Primary Energy Supply = 448 EJ) • Food TPES – 2700 Cal/person/day 6% 2% – Popn. 6.1 Billion 6% • Source for Food TPES 35% –FAO.org 10% • Nuclear conversion – kWh = 10.8 MJ • Hydro conversion 19% –kWh = 3.6 MJ • source for fuel TPES (9700 22% Mtoe) – Iea.org Oil Coal N.Gas Biomass Food Nuclear Hydro Business as Usual - World Energy according to IEA WEO2002 • 2030 time horizon • TPES grows at 1.7%/a from 9179 – 15267 Mtoe – No shortage of traditional fossil fuel resources (see next slide) – Requires considerable investment > 17 T$ (2002) • About 1% of global GDP • 50% goes for infrastructure replacement • Electricity system needs about 10 T$ (50% in T&D) • Oil and Gas each about 3
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE JUSTICE: the International Momentum Towards Climate Litigation
    CLIMATE JUSTICE: The international momentum towards climate litigation Keely Boom, Julie-Anne Richards and Stephen Leonard CLIMATE JUSTICE: The international momentum towards climate litigation Keely Boom, Julie-Anne Richards and Stephen Leonard 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Paris Agreement is ground breaking yet contradictory. In an era of fractured multilateralism it achieved above and beyond what was considered politically possible – yet it stopped far short of what is necessary to stop dangerous climate change. In the Paris Agreement, countries agreed to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5C, yet the mitigation pledges on the table at Paris will result in roughly 3C of warming, with insufficient finance to implement those pledges. The Paris Agreement was widely acknowledged to signal the end of the fossil fuel era, yet it does not explicitly use the words ‘fossil fuels’ throughout the entire document, nor does it contain any binding requirements that governments commit to any concrete climate recovery steps. Now, citizens and governments are beginning to seek redress in court with ground breaking cases emerging around the world, in a whole new area of litigation, some of which can be compared with the beginnings of - and based on some of the legal precedents set by - legal action against the tobacco industry. Other new strategies are focused not only on private industry but on the sovereign responsibility of governments to preserve constitutional and public trust rights to a stable climate and healthy atmosphere on behalf of both present and future generations. Climate litigation has spread beyond the US into new jurisdictions throughout Asia, the Pacific and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Going, Going, Gone
    Going, Going, Gone The role of auctions and competition in renewable electricity support Simon Moore Edited by Guy Newey Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Danny Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), David Meller (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Richard Ehrman, Virginia Fraser, Edward Heathcoat Amory, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Charles Stewart Smith and Simon Wolfson. About the Authors Simon Moore joined Policy Exchange in August 2010 as a Research Fellow for the Environment & Energy Unit. Before joining Policy Exchange, Simon worked for London-based think tank The Stockholm Network. He has a Master’s degree in Public Policy from the University of Maryland and a Bachelor’s degree in Politics from Lancaster University, where he was awarded the Oakeshott Prize for best overall performance in political theory and comparative politics. Guy Newey is Head of Environment and Energy at Policy Exchange. Before joining Policy Exchange, Guy worked as a journalist, including three years as a foreign correspondent in Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2018 Energy Prices In February 2018 the Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill was introduced to Parliament, which will put in place a requirement on the independent regulator, Ofgem, to cap energy tariffs until 2020. It will mean an absolute cap can be set on poor value tariffs, protecting the 11 million households in England, Wales and Scotland who are currently on a standard variable or other default energy tariff and who are not protected by existing price caps. An extension to Ofgem’s safeguard tariff cap was introduced in February 2018 which will see a further one million more vulnerable consumers protected from unfair energy price rises. Nuclear In June 2018 the Government announced a deal with the nuclear sector to ensure that nuclear energy continues to power the UK for years to come through major innovation, cutting-edge technology and ensuring a diverse and highly-skilled workforce. Key elements include: • a £200 million Nuclear Sector Deal to secure the UK’s diverse energy mix and drive down the costs of nuclear energy meaning cheaper energy bills for customers; • a £32 million boost from government and industry to kick-start a new advanced manufacturing programme including R&D investment to develop potential world-leading nuclear technologies like advanced modular reactors; • a commitment to increasing gender diversity with a target of 40% women working in the civil nuclear sector by 2030. 2017 Energy Policy In October 2017 the Government published The Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low carbon future, which aims to cut emissions while keeping costs down for consumers, creating good jobs and growing the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Submitted by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (WIND 01)
    Energy and Climate Change Committee The Economics of Wind Power written evidence REF: Page WIND 01 Department of Energy and Climate Change 5 WIND 02 Maureen Beaumont 9 WIND 03 D E Simmons CEng; MIMechE; CMIOSH; RMaPS 11 WIND 04 Galloway Landscape And Renewable Energy (GLARE) 12 WIND 05 Dr. Ian Woollen 15 WIND 06 Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) 16 WIND 07 Viscount Monckton of Brenchley 18 WIND 08 ABB 21 WIND 09 Roland Heap 24 WIND 10 David Campbell 29 WIND 11 The Renewable Energy Foundation 31 WIND 12 Brian Skittrall 34 WIND 13 Sir Donald Miller 37 WIND 14 Hengistbury Residents' Association (HENRA) 40 WIND 15 Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy ‐ UK 43 WIND 16 REG Windpower Ltd 46 WIND 17 Adrian J Snook 52 WIND 18 Montgomeryshire Local Council Forum; Welshpool Town Council 55 WIND 19 Ian W Murdoch 57 WIND 20 Mrs Brenda Herrick 60 WIND 21 Mr N W Woolmington 62 WIND 22 Professor Jack W Ponton FREng 63 WIND 23 Mrs Anne Rogers 65 WIND 24 Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) 67 WIND 25 Derek Partington 70 WIND 26 Professor Michael Jefferson 76 WIND 27 Robert Beith CEng FIMechE, FIMarE, FEI and Michael Knowles CEng 78 WIND 28 Barry Smith FCCA 81 WIND 29 The Wildlife Trusts (TWT) 83 WIND 30 Wyck Gerson Lohman 87 WIND 31 Brett Kibble 90 WIND 32 W P Rees BSc. CEng MIET 92 WIND 33 Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management 95 WIND 34 Councillor Ann Cowan 98 WIND 35 Ian M Thompson 99 WIND 36 E.ON UK plc 102 WIND 37 Brian D Crosby 105 WIND 38 Peter Ashcroft 106 WIND 39 Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) 109 WIND 40 Scottish Renewables 110 WIND 41 Greenpeace UK; World Wildlife Fund; Friends of the Earth 114 WIND 42 Wales and Borders Alliance 119 WIND 43 National Opposition to Windfarms 121 WIND 44 David Milborrow 124 WIND 45 SSE 126 WIND 46 Dr Howard Ferguson 129 WIND 47 Grantham Research Institute 132 WIND 48 George F Wood 135 WIND 49 Greenersky.
    [Show full text]
  • Etsu/K/Bd/00187/Rep Establishing a Local
    ESTABLISHING A LOCAL AUTHORITY MARKET FOR GREEN POWER ETSU/K/BD/00187/REP Contractor ESD Ltd Prepared by A Turnbull N Evans The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry First Published 1999 © Crown Copyright 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this project is to establish how to maximise the potential local authority (LA) market for green power by examining the procurement and supply issues, and identifying ways to overcome the potential barriers faced both by LAs (as purchasers) and potential green electricity suppliers. To do this, it is important to understand how LAs normally procure goods and services and how power suppliers normally supply electricity. Once these two processes are understood, it is much easier to understand the issues for a LA wishing to procure green energy and for a power supplier wishing to provide green electricity, instead of buying or supplying conventional electricity. The first stage of the project was to assess the procurement processes of the LAs. This review of LA energy procurement processes resulted in a report covering the following: • background to LA structure and how this may influence procurement practices; • the liberalised market opportunities for renewable energy; • current purchasing arrangements, particularly the important role of the Standing Order; • data requirements for LAs preparing tenders; • options for, and barriers to, purchasing green energy; • conclusions, covering how the current procurement practices can be adapted to promote the procurement of green energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from 12 Wind Energy Markets
    30 Years of Policies for Wind Energy Lessons from 12 Wind Energy Markets IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency Copyright (c) IRENA 2013 Unless otherwise indicated, material in this publication may be used freely, shared or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested. IRENA and GWEC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from IRENA/GWEC. Any omissions and errors are solely the responsibility of the authors. DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of materials herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the International Renewable Energy Agency concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in this material also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. 2 IRENA-GWEC: 30 YEARS OF POLICIES FOR WIND ENERGY ABOUT IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) promotes the accelerated adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy. IRENA’s founding members were inspired by the opportunities offered by renewable energy to enable sustainable development while addressing issues of energy access, security and volatility. Established in 2009, the intergovernmental organisation provides a global networking hub, advisory resource and unified voice for renewable energy. www.irena.org REPORT CONCEPT AND EDITORIAL VIEW This report was commissioned by IRENA and produced in collaboration with the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC).
    [Show full text]
  • The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries The United Kingdom 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR 9, rue de la Fédération, ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France AND DEVELOPMENT The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris autonomous body which was established in November on 14th December 1960, and which came into force 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall implement an international energy programme. promote policies designed: It carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co- • to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth operation among twenty-six* of the OECD’s thirty and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries. The basic aims of the IEA are: Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development • to maintain and improve systems for coping with oil of the world economy; supply disruptions; • to contribute to sound economic expansion in • to promote rational energy policies in a global Member as well as non-member countries in the context through co-operative relations with non- process of economic development; and member countries, industry and international organisations; • to contribute to the expansion
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy
    Renewable energy Prepared by Audit Scotland September 2013 Auditor General for Scotland The Auditor General’s role is to: • appoint auditors to Scotland’s central government and NHS bodies • examine how public bodies spend public money • help them to manage their finances to the highest standards • check whether they achieve value for money. The Auditor General is independent and reports to the Scottish Parliament on the performance of: • directorates of the Scottish Government • government agencies, eg the Scottish Prison Service, Historic Scotland • NHS bodies • further education colleges • Scottish Water • NDPBs and others, eg Scottish Police Authority, Scottish Fire and Rescue Service. You can find out more about the work of the Auditor General on our website: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/about/ags Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April 2000 under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000. We help the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission check that organisations spending public money use it properly, efficiently and effectively. Renewable energy | 3 Contents Summary 4 Key messages 5 Part 1. Background 7 Part 2. Leadership 11 Part 3. Funding 17 Part 4. Performance 24 Endnotes 37 Appendix 1. Audit methodology 39 Appendix 2. Membership of the advisory group 41 Exhibit data When viewing this report online, you can access background data by clicking on the graph icon. The data file will open in a new window. 4 | Summary Key facts Total public sector budget for 2013/14 and 2014/15 £264 million
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Energy Associates
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Energy subsidies in the UK Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee for the inquiry into Energy subsidies in the UK and accepted as written evidence are included List of written evidence Page 1 Oxford Energy 1 2 Bryan Norris 57 3 Calor Gas Ltd 59 4 Energy Fair 77 5 Dr David Toke 83 6 Renewable Energy Association 93 7 Association for the Conservation of Energy 98 8 Wood Panel Industries Federation 108 9 Friends of the Earth 110 10 Nuclear Industries Association 119 11 Platform 121 12 BSW Timber 128 13 Alan Simpson 130 14 Renewable UK 135 15 EDF Energy 140 16 Oil & Gas UK 147 17 Vestas Wind Systems 156 18 Fuel Poverty Advisory Group 157 19 Malcolm Grimston 166 20 Department of Energy and Climate Change and HM Treasury 179 1 Written evidence commissioned by the Committee from Dr William Blyth, Oxford Energy Associates Acknowledgements This report has benefited from inputs and suggestions from a number of colleagues, and the author would like to thank in particular Antony Froggatt, Doug Koplow, Richard Tol, Morgan Bazilian, and Ulrik Stridbaek. Any outstanding errors and omissions remain the author’s. 2 CONTENTS 1 Background ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Subsidies from first principles ........................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Perfect markets as a benchmark for assessing subsidies .......................... 2 1.1.2 Critique of perfect market assumptions .................................................... 3 1.1.3 Consequences for policy decision-making on subsidies ............................ 4 1.1.4 Source of economic inefficiencies of subsidies ......................................... 6 1.1.5 Types of subsidy ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]