DOCSLIB.ORG

'I""""'-""'1L" 1--I1'iji—I+ * Itili J L'u#H"Ilhh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'I %From: 'l-I-'I'l'[email protected] 2Sent: -u.Friday, MayJ1-In-u_|19, 2017 6:43 AM I.To: Jeff.1 Wilson j.Subject: II.J'I-F-ICityof DuPont Critical-'l—-I-IJ——Areas Ordinance _. *Attachments: .-|..CALPORTLAND'S_-..|..|J._-I.-.1PROMISESVS ITS PERFORMANCE.docx;THE-_._.....CONSEQUENCEOF. I’u'f-—II'EIf£ZIJ1—-I'£-'—uIu'TJf—ZDEWATERINGTHEVASHON AQUIFER.docx;WILLRESTORATION ACTIONS PROPOSED -IuIJu-I—I-':I:FIu1I-ASSUREATTAINMENT.docx;EDMOND MARSH FACT-'-u- VS FICTION.docx;u-2 THE'-IIu—_.POWER OFI 'A COMMONH SHARED'I—In'I'I'IIIIVISION.docx Follow up Flagged 'I""""'-""'1l"My name is Don Russell. H-'E!"f-HIH-IIFIK-§We have not met so allow me to introduce myself. I1--I1'IJI—I+am a retired fish biologist andd—l j*an Executive Committee member of the Chambers-Clover Watershed (WRIA—I- 12)I.'jCouncil. Ouru'P'u'EP'—'f|IEIZTICouncil has had a long standing interest—'—fH—-Iff—J—L'—in the restoration of the Sequalitchew Creek watershed——I for the'I'I-‘IIreturn of, and beneficial use by, Coho salmon and Puget Sound Steelhead. These threatened and endangered species once (up until the late 1990s) inhabited this watershed. For the past eight years now I have monitored water quality conditions in the Sequalitchew Creek watershed, provided public comment throughout the Ca|Port|and/Environmental Caucus Memorandum of Understanding, Feasibility Study and 2011 Settlement process, responded to questions posed by concerned citizens about this process, and witnessed Ca|Port|and's heavy handed administration (under constant threat of "protracted |itigation") of this process. Allduring this21-.time the City of DuPont representative,jjjltjjj-—I much to the consternation of many residents, have played little to no role in *determining the outcome of this ongoing process. HavingJ.--|:|-.l.l_|-.__|jJ.I.T.-.|:|..-|..-I.witnessed Ca|Port|and's past manipulation of City representatives (Ca|Port|and wins the City looses):__ and non participationrI—I-I-|-a-|-I-I--I|-I-I-|&r|rI-|-|l-I-|-|.I--.——Ir|-by City representatives over the past eight years in a process that will determine the fate ofr—.rI-—Sequalitchew Creek-_|_||.|—|.|_|and Edmond Marsh many--_..|__|_|.-longtime residents of theI.-I.a|.|__—City of DuPont are pretty upset.,_| Thisr_..j_l_upsetness manifests itself'I—fj-I'I—-'l'—'I—in push back on any apparent appeasement on'EX'I'£'fTI"IfI'Ibehalf of CaIPort|and's quest to dewaterIjfl the VashonZIJZII aquifer so as to-:2I—I-mine gravel under dry'IhhHhconditions in the South Parcel. This'I-j-2 concern is what isITIlIbehind Jthe non supportive behavior of one'ff'I"I'?IJ:ZT'I'fEIof the City's Planning Commission members and likelyZIIIFZIIZIJHZPEJwill be evident by some City Council members. I thoughtI'ZII—I’I'IJIEET—uI'fZI—fIEEu'X'fZ—it might be helpful to provide you some background on why many longtime residents'—'Iffu'IuIIn'?IJof the City of DuPont are suspicious?m? of City staff's motivations inl‘u#h"ILhhthe drafting of the City's Critical Areas Ordinance. Their—I'fI'IfP'fI'IZffIview is that the language of the current'I'I'u'In—TI’TIfI'—'fIZuCAO that prohibits alteration of Class 1 EdmondI'I'I'Zf'IfIMarsh is the onlyI'IfI'Tleverage thatI—Iuthe CityI-F—I?-jllzl-I—u'I-I—Iu'jhas left to prevent dewatering of the South Parcel. ShouldIjljlul-II-I1Iu'jdewatering of the South Parcel be_permitted :|-rr-I—I-—I—I-I-—-there will be an adverse environmental impact on-Ir-r—-Irrl-I-I-I-I-.|rI-I-H--1-I-1Kettle wetland (it will be removed), Edmond Marsh, Riparian seeps, a. _l__|.l_-:l.|_|_|-I.significant reduction in Sequalitchew Creek flow, pollution_|.|_a|.|.|—|_.:of Puget Sound Springs and the-.._---__..legacy of a mined out pit (Sequalitchew'fEI'I'fI Village)—TIfZTIfIu'ZI'IEIZIfIfX'f-IffIIT’Iuunsuitable and unsafe for occupancy by either residents or industrial firms. -j-HjYou might find the attached papers useful in understanding why the misplaced push jhback the City Tis receiving on the 'I"I'l|l'Il-|"l'l'i"Il"C'?lIcurrent draft of the Critical Areas Ordinance.:HMy opinion: They?lI|"II'I|!IIIIIl?Ill|.lI|lh|llllIIIuare well written with minor exception. igl-Best regards, ATTACHMENT 56 (CA0 TEXT 6-04) WILLrug RESTORATION|.I.|.-Ina ACTIONSIjf?uf?léilfl-q‘PROPOSED ASSURE ATTAINMENT -l"f"&.-"'OF THE VISION? "I-I-IPreface This'—22'——II--—-Iu'£u'JJ-LITI--I—Ipaper recites the Sequalitchew Creek Restoration Plan’s Vision, examines the extent to'- which-1-I-I--—‘?-I—'-II-rlthe ?ve action elements speci?ed by the 2011' Settlement'-I-1--.l-jlijAgreement as ?eshed out—r|- by the SouthI.-.-.F|_l.|.l_||.I_|.I_|-_..Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group (and_II..-.-—its advisors) _|and publishedI'll"-"H-Z'ljI-j.'Zin the Sequalitchew Creek Watershed Restoration Plan: Publicr—.I'-—.:Review Draft will,I-I if|a.|.I.|._I|.aj|.-I.-.|.|_executed, result in attainment of the Vision. “The"-'-I—':-—Sequalitchew Creek Restoration':I—I'-I--I-I-HPlan will identi?zactionsl—I andrII-I-I-Irjprobable project .-.-|.|.l.r.|._l.|-__|_|..|_|_—__|._|__|:-costs necessary to restore flowsand ecological conditions for native salmonid n'f*'fI—'Ipopulations in the Sequalitchew'ff—'fPu'EIf- Creek Basin. ” TI‘ ,5 ""_':.n.-'-""_What are the requisiteflowsand ecological [i.e., physical, chemical and biological] conditions for native salmonid'*£populations in the Sequalitchew Creek Basin? The -é--1Restoration Plan is silent in regard to providing|.--l.||.--|.-.-|.|.—|-an answer to this question. %r?jhi—What are the jcurrent ?ows and wet and dry season physical, chemical and biological conditionsjl-1‘?-I-IT-II-'1'-'-I""I-I-'-E-|&jhin Edmond Marsh and Sequalitchew Creek? The Restoration Plan is silent in regardju-L-j-—jto providing an answer to this question. Third Question Whatr|.u.I_|_.|__|._.I.||_|_..:|I__|g..—|.|:restoration actions are required to change current ?ows and physical, chemical and_| biologicalrl-11::-jl conditions in the Sequalitchew Creek.:j.II-L111:watershed so as to assure attainment of theI.-.-—..Vision, i.e.,flowsI__|_|..|_|and ecological conditions_|—;.jj....:..-for native salmonia’populations? Rather'-'-I-jjhthan acknowledging the currentfl‘-'d'l'l"'I'l-l'l'I'I'condition of the watershed (answerrI-I-l- to the second1: ...-_|question) J.|I.|.|__|_l.||.|_I.and proposing restoration actions that willJ'I-'-Ibring it|.|._..|—.-.|.into compliance with the -I-I-'-||'|—rI|-I-I-uju-jlspeci?c flowsand ecological conditions required to sustainjljl-jjx. a native salmonid population j|.|.r.|._|__J.I:|_-I.(answer to the first question) the Restoration Plan responds.._..|.-J...:.|.l,_-to this question by ?eshing out1---Jju.-.|r.I.—the ?ve action elements speci?ed by the 2011 Settlement|.jJJ..I.-muslinAgreement that assume that ‘—'-ilil--I.l—-I-I-I.-in-I-Fthese ?ve action elements will, if executed, realize the Vision. -"IWhy ShouldE'-——I—l--I-IJ-I-I-I—rI-I:j-:-j-the Plan Set Forth Answers to the First and Second Questions? hasBecause the-2|-I-Ilnrunjnxla-.—I.I.l.—:_answers to the ?rst and second questions provide the foundation and I:|.|.j.J..|——.|.-|._._.:._......|....framework for evaluating the relative merit of all proposed restoration actions being “Therur-_|.Iproposed mining facility-|.—-._|._-__|.|.I.-would continue and reinforcetheIii current nature ofIn-land use—-‘-in the City-I-rlofDuPont.— The"I-inoverall characterrI-I-I-J--III.-jr|.q.I_-.ofthe City would not be ajfected. No developedr|.|—-— uses would_|.|..|:|..p_-...:j-..j,_._._..|be adversely affectedby construction or operation ofthe proposed facility..-I-I-I Future-I-I-|—.-j-I.|--1JIJJa-..|.l.|-..l.._l.|..-uses planned in LID I aajacent to the site are generally compatible with theI._|.|.|._._.—|industrial use proposed. Some|_:_....._futureindustrial uses within:,:..,....1.-portions ofthe reclaimed J-J-—r-2:.area could be limited due toIII.-.r.|.I.proximity to the groundr_|._|.I_|. water table. ”- J.rI-||r.l.|.I|.I_||.|.-In 1994 CalPortland entered into an Agreement|.j|.-I.rI..--|.I-__-with the City of DuPont, et -'al, thatI. -I---I-I-h-I-'|—-rI-Zcontained the following provisions: "Lonebk-3'3Star and WRECO, in cooperationT with Ecology,T agree to placej; educational. signs “"F1-H-éll-r?Ti-jgi-H-?ljraand native vegetation adjacent to the trail in the location ofthe salt marsh to educate the public_qFujuZZIuZ-I-I‘and discourage physical intrusion into the marsh area.” -I-j”WRECOand Lone Star agree to seek .||.-.lno permit in thefuture‘PHto mine... inhi.a manner Ethat A wouldI-Hsignificantly impact theflowofSequalitchew Creek. " Duringu-I. the-:.|1:.p.1|r|.I.|_l.....|:l_|..|__.:|period 2000 through 2006 CalPortland engaged consultants whose assignment was*l'I'I'l"d'l"fl"l-l'l"I'-—'l'f-to conduct studies of the Edmond Marsh/Sequalitchew Creek watershed11-11; and come up with.-...|. a plan that|.|_|.I_Iwould avail CalPortland.|-.l_|.|I. of the unmined_|,.|-..|_...|-I.Vashon aquifer saturated1" (wet)__ gravel—-I-II in 117‘HIacres of--the existing3 360-acre-—ul site as well—Iu-jlapuas the saturated (wet) gravel contained_|—|---:-.,_.—|_'_.j_in 177 acres of a proposed south expansion area. I.|.J........'-._..Both these areas are leased fromI-.- the Weyerhaeuser|rj.1—.|1|a.p.I Real Estate Company. CalPortland.-.-_|.|.I.-.|.|..|_ also intends to mine unsaturatedj'.—IrI-I (dry) gravel fromI-—180-'rI--acres in a-I-I-rj:—lr—.north expansion area that it owns.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation
    South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation Dr. Timothy Stokes President September, 2014 Table of Contents Report on Year One Recommendation ......................................................................................................... 1 Mission .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Mission Fulfillment .................................................................................................................................... 1 Operational Planning ................................................................................................................................ 2 Core Themes, Objectives and Indicators .................................................................................................. 3 Part II ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Rationale for Indicators of Achievement .................................................................................................. 5 Increase Student Retention (Objective 1.A) ......................................................................................... 5 Support Student Completion (Objective 1.B) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tacoma‐Pierce County Board of Health
    Tacoma‐Pierce County Board of Health Regular Meeting Agenda 3629 South D Street, Tacoma, WA 98418 January 20, 2021 Board of Health Clerk, (253) 798‐2899 3 ‐ 5 p.m. Board Members Remote Attendance Only Keith Blocker Dial in: 253 215 8782 Marty Campbell Meeting ID: 992 6138 9468 Bruce Dammeier William Hirota, MD Passcode: 575390 Patricia Johnson Dave Morell Catherine Ushka I. CALL TO ORDER Derek Young II. ROLL CALL III. ELECTION OF BOARD OF HEALTH (BOH) OFFICERS Motion for 2021 BOH Chair Motion for 2021 BOH Vice Chair IV. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC The Board will consider written and oral public comments. Submit written comments any time prior to when a Board of Health meeting adjourns at [email protected]. Written comments we receive prior to noon on the date of a Board of Health meeting will go to Board members before the meeting. For the duration of the declared public health emergency, make oral comments when you join the meeting by phone with the number, meeting ID, and passcode at the top of the agenda. Press *9 to raise your hand and signal you wish to make a comment. You will be announced by your name or the last four digits of your phone number. Comments unrelated to specific agenda items have a two‐minute limit per person. The Chair has the authority to change the time limits as deemed necessary. All written and oral comments will become part of the meeting record. V. COVID‐19: Update [Anthony L‐T Chen, Director of Health] [Nigel Turner, Incident Commander] [Kayla Scrivner, Public Health Nurse] VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits
    PNNL-17161 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits Z Yang TP Khangaonkar December 2007 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Flooding in Glacial Terrain of Southern Puget Sound
    science fora changing world Ground-Water Flooding in Glacial Terrain of Southern Puget Sound, Washington glacial lakes, and diverting drainage landforms and, in some places, eroded southward to the Chehalis River and then away sediments deposited during the west to the Pacific Ocean to create exten­ glacial advance. Coarse sediment, known sive outwash plains6' 7' 10. At its maximum as the Steiiacoom Gravel, was also extent, the glacier stretched from the deposited on the upland by water flowing Cascade Range to the Olympic Mountains through the intersecting channels and and extended south as far as Tenino, braided streams that further conveyed the Wash., in Thurston County, occupying all water away from the proglacial lake.2- 13 of the lowland area and lower mountain This gravel deposit is consistently coarse valleys. The glacier reached altitudes up over the central Pierce County upland to 4,000 feet along the mountain front10; area. Stones in the Steiiacoom Gravel are 6,000 feet near the present day United predominantly 1 inch in size and most do States-Canada border; 3,000 feet near not exceed 3 inches. 13 The thickness of Seattle; 2,200 feet near Tacoma; and less the gravel is generally 20 feet or less with than 1.000 feet near Olympia. 1' 4- 10 a maximum that rarely exceeds 60 feet. The resulting landscape is characterized T^\ ue to a global warming trend, the by many shallow, elongated depressions Figure 1. Proglacial Lake Puyattup and J ^Vashon Glacier began retreating and ice-contact depressions (kettles). The successive Lake Spillways (modified from its terminus about 17.000 years ago.7 larger and deeper depressions are occu­ from Thorson, 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap County Watershed Location Map Washington State Seems to Have an Abundance of Water
    KITSAP COUNTY INITIAL BASIN ASSESSMENT October 1997 With the multitudes of lakes, streams, and rivers, Kitsap County Watershed Location Map Washington State seems to have an abundance of water. The demand for water resources, however, has steadily increased each year, while the water supply has stayed the same, or in some cases, appears to have declined. This increased demand for limited water resources has made approving new water uses complex and controversial. To expedite decisions about pending water rights, it is vital to accurately assess the quality and quantity of our surface and ground water. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) recognizes that water right decisions must be based on accurate scientific information. Ecology is working with consultants and local governments to conduct special studies called Initial What do we know about the Kitsap County Watershed or Basin Assessments throughout the Basin? State. The assessments describe existing water rights, streamflows, precipitation, geology, hydrology, Kitsap County encompasses almost 400 square miles and water quality, fisheries resources, and land use occupies a peninsula and several islands in Puget Sound. patterns. It is bounded on the east and north by Puget Sound and The assessments evaluate existing data on water which Admiralty Inlet, and on the west by Hood Canal. The will assist Ecology to make decisions about pending County is adjoined by Pierce and Mason Counties on the water right applications. The assessments do not affect south, Jefferson County
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Prairies the Nature Conservancy of Washington 2007 Conservation Vision
    Conservation Action Planning Report for the SOUTH PUGET SOUND PRAIRIES The Nature Conservancy of Washington 2007 CONSERVATION VISION Successful conservation of the South Puget Sound Prairies will entail elements of protection, active land management and restoration, and integration of the full suite of partners working within the Willamette Valley - Puget Trough - Georgia Basin Ecoregion. The portfolio of protected conservation sites will contain a mosaic of habitats that support the full-range of prairie and oak woodland species. This portfolio will be a total of 20 protected sites, including at least six core areas. The core areas of the portfolio consist of protected sites embedded within a mosaic of land-use that complements prairie conservation and the protected conservation sites. The portfolio will take advantage of the wide-range of microclimates in the South Puget Sound, aimed at providing resiliency to the potential effects of climate change. The South Puget Sound will contribute to the conservation of rare species by promoting and implementing recovery actions throughout their historic range. Active management of the prairie maximizes the contribution to conservation of all portfolio sites. These management actions are coordinated and integrated across a range of partners and landowners. This integration ensures that information transfer is exemplary, that organizations are linked formally and informally and that sufficient resources are generated for all partners. The South Puget Sound Prairies will be a primary source for prairie-specific science and restoration techniques. It will similarly be a source concerning the science and conservation for fragmented natural systems. Prairie conservation in the South Puget Sound will be supported by a community that is actively engaged through a vigorous volunteer program and supports the financial and policy issues that affect prairies.
    [Show full text]
  • PUGET SOUND PLAZA PUGET SOUND PLAZA 1325 Fourth Avenue | Seattle, Washington 98101
    PUGET SOUND PLAZA PUGET SOUND PLAZA 1325 Fourth Avenue | Seattle, Washington 98101 VIEW THE NEW ONLINE TOUR BOOK HERE BUILDING FACTS BUILDING AMENITIES ON-SITE RETAIL » Lobby » Total Building Size ...................279,586 RSF » Union Deli » Conference room facility » Number of Floors ....................21 » Key Bank » Shower » Average Floor Plate ................13,800 RSF » Seattle Vision Care » 306 parking stalls » Year Built .....................................1960 » Skyline Hair Design » EV charging system » Parking Ratio .............................1 / 1,800 SF » Northwest Pendleton » Bike storage » LEED Gold Certified » UW - Husky Central » Fitwel Viral Response Certified » Kudedon Noodles Click the play buttons for virtual tours Damon McCartney David Greenwood (206) 838-7633 (206) 838-7635 [email protected] [email protected] Fairview Ave N Aloha St Valley St Roy St E Roy St Mercer St Yale Ave N Ave Yale E Mercer St Republican St Republican St Bellevue E Ave Westlake Ave N Ave Westlake Fairview Ave N Ave Fairview Dexter N Ave 9th Ave N 9th Ave Harrison St Thomas St John St Denny Way Westlake Ave 6th Ave Stewart St Battery St WALK SCORE Bell St PUGET SOUND PLAZA Blanchard St 99AVG ACROSS ALL 1325 Fourth Avenue | Seattle, Washington 98101 Olive Way METROPOLITAN TRACT BLDGS Lenora St Pine St 1 Virginia St RAINIER 6th Ave TOWER 1 CBD 7 PUGET SOUND 1 5th Ave PLAZA Pike St Lifestyle 6 1. Regal Cinemas 4th Ave 1 2 2. Westlake Park 5 2 1 3. Home Street Bank 3 9 Union St SKINNER 4. 5th Avenue Theater 2 2nd Ave BUILDING 5. U.S. Post Office 7 1 6. Key Bank 4 7 3 6 4 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Lime Kiln Point State Park (San Juan Island)
    Ranald MacDonald’s Grave Your guide to state parks in the Auto-accessible parks Auto-accessible parks Lime Kiln Point State Park Moran State Park Spencer Spit State Park Obstruction Pass State Park Welcome (San Juan Island) (Orcas Island) (Lopez Island) (Orcas Island) San Juan The San Juan archipelago north of Puget At Lime Kiln Point State Park, the loud neighbors Pass through the welcome arch at Moran State Spencer Spit on Lopez Island provides dramatic Obstruction Pass State Park is one of the few Sound is like no other place on earth. The cluster gear up for a party that runs from spring into Park, and time begins to slow. You’ll find yourself views of Decatur and Blakely islands and Mount public beaches on famed Orcas Island. of 400 islands and rocks in the Salish Sea is a fall. Those would be the spouting Orcas, fin- in a Northwest island frame of mind, free to relax, Constitution on Orcas Island, and it features a Though most people flock to its bigger world unto itself. It is a world where people are slapping gray whales, barking sea lions and breathe and head into the vast, varied terrain. rare sand spit enclosed by a salt-chuck lagoon. neighbor, Moran State Park, this property’s friendly and hearty, where the land smells like splashing porpoises. Hike, cycle or drive to the summit of Mount The effect is a driftwood-scattered beach on quiet beauty is unsurpassed. Clear waters lap at the sea, and wind, art and history are celebrated. Constitution for expansive views of the San Juan one side of the spit and a spongy marsh on the pebbly beaches, and madrone trees cling to Obstruction Pass Islands For island dwellers and visitors, the pace of life other.
    [Show full text]
  • Muckleshoot Library 2006 Community Study
    Engage. Muckleshoot Library 2006 Community Study Turn to us. The choices will surprise you. CONTENTS COMMUNITY OVERVIEW Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 1 Muckleshoot Tribe ............................................................................................ 1 Muckleshoot Library Service Area: Past and Present.............................................. 3 Geography ............................................................................................ 4 Transportation ....................................................................................... 5 Education and Schools ............................................................................ 5 Demographics ....................................................................................... 4 Business ............................................................................................... 4 History of the Muckleshoot Library: Past, Present & Future..................................... 6 COMMUNITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 8 BOARD PRESENTATION SLIDES MAPS • Muckleshoot Aerial Overview • Muckleshoot Library Circulation APPENDICES • Demographic Summary • School Statistics • School Test Scores • Race in Service Area • Age in Service Area • Languages Spoken at Home • Occupational Profile • Home Sales in Service Area • Tribes COMMUNITY OVERVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study encompasses the southeast sector of Auburn, Tribal Reservation lands and parts
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Region
    Puget Sound Region July 2014 Regional Catastrophic Disaster Coordination Plan Part 1: User Guide Part 2: Plan The above links will take you directly to the User Guide or the Plan. Puget Sound Regional Catastrophic Disaster Coordination Plan User Guide USER GUIDE OVERVIEW & CONTEXT User Guide Purpose Concept of Coordination This User Guide is designed to 1) provide an overview of the Puget The Coordination Plan guides Whatcom Sound Regional Catastrophic Disaster Coordination Plan and to 2) be a regional coordination in a San Juan Skagit practical, hands-on mechanism for navigating regional coordination catastrophic event within the 8- Island Clallam generally and as relates to specific topics explored in depth in each of county Puget Sound Region. Snohomish Kitsap the supporting plans and toolkits. The Guide includes an overview of the “Regional coordination” means Jefferson RGPGP Plans and Coordination Groups that have been developed for multiple counties or Tribal Nations King Grays Harbor Mason specific topics (UG-10). are involved. The Plan does not focus Pierce on the internal plans and responses The User Guide is not a replacement for the full text of the Coordination Thurston of individual counties. Plan. Pacific Lewis Northwest Washington How to Use this Guide Regional Coordination Processes & Tools This document provides an overview and practical guide to using the The Coordination Plan provides guidance in four areas: Coordination Plan. 1. Use of Incident Snapshots (UG-4) to share information among Clicking on a blue box with page number (p. #) will bring you to counties. relevant information within this User Guide and the full 2.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006
    South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006 Making connections and building partnerships to protect the marine waters, streams, and watersheds of Nisqually, Henderson, Budd, Eld and Totten Inlets The economic vitality of South Puget Sound is intricately linked to the environmental health of the Sound’s marine waters, streams, and watersheds. It’s hard to imagine the South Sound without annual events on or near the water - Harbor Days Tugboat Races, Wooden Boat Fair, Nisqually Watershed Festival, Swantown BoatSwap and Chowder Challenge, Parade of Lighted Ships – and other activities we prize such as beachcombing, boating, fishing, or simply enjoying a cool breeze at a favorite restaurant or park. South Sound is a haven for relaxation and recreation. Businesses such as shellfish growers and tribal fisheries, tourism, water recreational boating, marinas, port-related businesses, development and real estate all directly depend on the health of the South Sound. With strong contributions from the South Sound, statewide commercial harvest of shellfish draws in over 100 million dollars each year. Fishing, boating, travel and tourism are all vibrant elements in the region’s base economy, with over 80 percent of the state’s tourism and travel dollars generated in the Puget Sound Region. Many other businesses benefit indirectly. Excellent quality of life is an attractor for great employees, and the South Puget Sound has much to offer! The South Puget Sound Forum, held in Olympia on April 29, 2006, provided an opportunity to rediscover the connections between economic vitality and the health of South Puget Sound, and to take action to protect the valuable resources of the five inlets at the headwaters of the Puget Sound Basin – Totten, Eld, Budd, Henderson, and the Nisqually Reach.
    [Show full text]