DOCSLIB.ORG

Vehicle Integration Between Carl-Gustaf M4 and Trackfire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vehicle Integration Between Carl-Gustaf M4 and Trackfire Vehicle Integration between Carl-Gustaf M4 and Trackfire RWS A concept study on mechanical solutions Fordonsintegrering mellan Carl-Gustaf M4 och Trackfire RWS En konceptstudie på mekaniska lösningar Isabelle Dietmann Faculty of Health, Science and Technology Degree Project for Master of Science in Engineering, Mechanical Engineering 30 hp Supervisor: Anders Gåård Examiner: Jens Bergström 2020-07-04 Abstract Saab Dynamics is a division of Swedish company Saab AB, offering solutions, products, and services for military defence. Included in the Saab Dynamics portfolio is the Carl-Gustaf recoilless rifle; a man-portable, reusable, anti-tank weapon system. Another Saab produced system is the Trackfire Remote Weapon Station; a remotely operated weapon and sensor system, purposed for use on all types of military platforms. Armoured vehicles used by the Swedish Armed Forces are sometimes equipped with remote weapon stations that aim to provide the vehicle crew with protection, by allowing them to operate the weapons from inside the vehicle. These weapon stations can integrate a selection of different weapons, but there are currently no systems in operation that allow integration of the Carl-Gustaf system. This project was initiated based on a request from the Life Guards, for an integrating system between the Carl-Gustaf M4 and a remote weapon station. The project was conducted at Saab Dynamics, Karlskoga, in cooperation with Karlstad University, and aimed to generate suggestions of vehicle integration between the Carl-Gustaf M4 and a remote weapon station. The project was performed as a product development process, using a systematic method for construction and design to develop concept solutions of an integrating system between Carl- Gustaf M4 barrels, and the Trackfire RWS. The report includes a literature study, performed during a feasibility study, on the three systems: Carl-Gustaf weapon system, remote weapon stations, and wheeled armoured vehicles. Recoil principles and interior ballistics of recoilless rifles are further explained and applied to the study. The feasibility study resulted in a specification of requirements, which was used as a foundation for the concept development. Concepts of solutions were generated and eliminated using a brainstorming session, a morphological matrix, elimination matrices, and decision matrices. One concept was chosen as the final concept solution; a concept comprised of a construction that enables integration of four Carl-Gustaf M4 barrels on the Trackfire RWS, while dampening the recoil that comes from firing a gun. The construction was modelled and analysed using 3D design and engineering platform 3DExperience. Analyses revealed a strong construction that withstands forces arising when a weapon is operated, yet further analyses on how the construction would manage subjection to long-term vehicle vibration and weapon operation are required. Construction dimension optimisations are encouraged, as well as further development of construction details. Recommendations and suggestions on how to proceed with the system integration are provided as a final part of the report. Sammanfattning Saab Dynamics är en division i svenska företaget Saab AB, som erbjuder lösningar, produkter och tjänster för militärt försvar. Inkluderat i Saab Dynamics porfolio finns granatgevär Carl- Gustaf; ett bärbart, återanvändbart pansarvärnsvapen. Ett annat Saab-producerat system är Trackfire Remote Weapon Station; ett fjärrstyrt vapen- och sensorsystem, ämnat för användning på alla typer av militärplattformar. Pansarfordon som används av Försvarsmakten är ibland utrustade med fjärrstyrda vapenstationer som skyddar fordonsbesättningen genom att låta dem manövrera vapnen inifrån fordonet. Dessa vapenstationer kan integrera ett urval av olika vapen, men för närvarande finns det inget system i drift som tillåter integrering av Carl-Gustaf systemet. Detta projekt initierades baserat på en begäran från Livgardet, om ett integrerande system mellan Carl-Gustaf M4 och en fjärrstyrd vapenstation. Projektet utfördes på Saab Dynamics Karlskoga, i samarbete med Karlstads universitet, och syftade till att generera förslag på fordonsintegrering mellan Carl-Gustaf M4 och en fjärrstyrd vapenstation. Projektet utfördes som en produktutvecklingsprocess, och använde en systematisk metod för konstruktion och design för att utveckla konceptlösningar för ett integrerande system mellan Carl-Gustaf M4 eldrör och Trackfire RWS. Rapporten inkluderar en litteraturstudie, som utfördes under en förstudie, om de tre systemen: Carl-Gustaf granatgevär, fjärrstyrda vapenstationer och hjuldrivna pansarfordon. Rekylprinciper och inre ballistik hos granatgevär förklaras vidare och appliceras i studien. Förstudien resulterade i en kravspecifikation, som användes som grund för konceptutvecklingen. Konceptlösningar genererades och eliminerades genom användning av en brainstorming session, en morfologisk matris, elimineringsmatriser och beslutsmatriser. Ett koncept valdes ut som den slutliga lösningen; ett koncept bestående av en konstruktion som möjliggör integrering av fyra Carl-Gustaf M4 eldrör på Trackfire RWS, samtidigt som den dämpar rekylen som uppstår vid skjutning av ett eldrör. Konstruktionen modellerades och analyserades i 3D-design- och teknikplattformen 3DExperience. Analyser avslöjade en stark konstruktion som motstår de krafter som uppstår vid användning av ett granatgevär, dock är fortsatta analyser av hur konstruktionen skulle klara att utsättas för fordonsvibrationer och gevärsanvändning under en längre period nödvändiga. Optimering av konstruktionsdimensioner uppmuntras, så som fortsatt utveckling av konstruktionsdetaljer. Rekommendationer och förslag på hur arbetet med systemintegrationen kan fortsättas presenteras i slutet av rapporten. Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest and sincerest gratitude towards my supervisor at Saab Dynamics, Elin Wallberg, for her constant support and encouragement. Special thanks to Urban Bruzén, for providing me with the opportunity of conducting this project, and for much needed guidance and feedback throughout the process. Thanks to Mats Lundkvist at the Life Guards, and Nils-Ola Svensson at Saab Järfälla, for organising interesting and rewarding visits, and providing essential information whenever needed. Tomas Pettersson and Linus Olsson; thank you so much for always answering my questions and for putting your own time aside to help me. Additionally, I would like to direct my gratitude towards my supervisor at Karlstad University, Anders Gåård, as well as the following people at Saab Dynamics who contributed with their expertise, and made this project an invaluable experience: Petri Hiltunen, Chamoun Malki, Jonas Björnsson, Martin Persson, Magnus Samuelsson, Burton Stopek, and Emanuel Hällgren. Isabelle Dietmann 2020-07-04, Karlstad Table of Contents Abbreviations and Symbols .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Saab AB and Saab Dynamics ............................................................................................................. 2 1.1.2 Carl-Gustaf weapon system .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Remote weapon station (RWS) ....................................................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Armoured vehicle .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Project definition ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1 Goals and purposes .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.2 Delimitations ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Theory ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Standard principles and equations .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Recoilless rifles ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Definitions and principles ................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Carl-Gustaf weapon system .............................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Wheeled armoured vehicle (WAV) ....................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Trackfire RWS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Current gun recoil systems .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Army Combat Developments Command
    .... _'., ~ .""" 'I " I "_ d'" • - "-' "\. ' ~ " •••) I I . ..... ,'_ ,.;. ... ~" U : 167 : .D96 . 1969 UNITED STATES ARMY COMBAT DEVELOPMENTS COMMAND -. -­ DYNAMICS OF FIRE AND MANEUVER (FIRMA TIl) (U) FINAL REPORT AeN 13986 15 AUGUST 1969 " .". ~ ... , , . ." . ~; TYOFUSARMY CASE STUDY #11 The Battle of Osan (Korea) 1. General. The Battle of Osan was the first engagement of the ~orean War involving American troops. It was fought by a battalion­ size force to delay the enemy's advance while its parent 'unit--the 24th Infantry Division--entered Korea through the port of Pusan and assembled around Taejon in early July 1950, soon after the beginning of North Korean Communist invasion of South Korea. The battle is of special interest because it illustrates the importance of fire­ effectiveness, unit training, reliable equipment, leadership, and military discipline. The holding action at Osan revealed many weak­ nesses in the equipment and personnel of the American Army of 1950 and in its uses of fire and maneuver in a delaying action. 2. Background. On 25 June 1950 (local time), the North Korean A~ (NKA) launched a surprise invasion of South Korea. When the forces of the Republic of Korea proved unable to contain this communist onslaught, the United States intervened under the auspices of the United Nations. In late June the 8th Army occupying Japan mobilized its four divisions and ordered the 24th Infantry Division to prepare to move by sea to Korea. At that time the chief American concern was to keep control of the port of Pusan in friendly hands as the harbor which was most suitable for 8th Army's entry into Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEXT WAR: How Another Conflict Between Hizballah and Israel Could Look and How Both Sides Are Preparing for It
    ANALYSIS PAPER Number 24, August 2011 THE NEXT WAR: How Another Conflict between Hizballah and Israel Could Look and How Both Sides are Preparing for It Bilal Y. Saab Nicholas Blanford The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Copyright © 2011 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 www.brookings.edu ANALYSIS PAPER Number 24, August 2011 THE NEXT WAR: How Another Conflict between Hizballah and Israel Could Look and How Both Sides are Preparing for It Bilal Y. Saab Nicholas Blanford Table of Contents Executive Summary . iii Acknowledgements . vi The Authors . vii Introduction . 1 Potential Return to Arms . 3 Hizballah Prepares for War . 6 Israel Prepares for War . 14 Conclusion . 20 THE NEXT WAR The Saban Center at BROOKINGS ii Executive Summary ebanon and Israel have enjoyed a rare calm waged between them, and both sides have been in the five years since the August 14, 2006 feverishly preparing for the next war ever since the ceasefire that brought an end to that sum- last one ended. Lmer’s month-long war, the fiercest ever action waged between Hizballah and the Israel Defense Hizballah’s Posture Forces (IDF). Since the end of the 2006 war, Hizballah has under- Both sides drew sharp lessons from the 2006 conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gun & Artillery System
    Business overview for Defense Division Gun & Artillery System Pride in advanced technology People-Oriented Human Mechatronics ! HYUNDAI WIA will open our living future along with nature HYUNDAI WIA is now making a lot of exertions for improving our happiness through High Technology And HYUNDAI WIA is developing various Social Volunteer Activities in order to fulfill our obligation, contribution to our society Human Mechatronics World which HYUNDAI WIA is seeking after is affluent human society construction living with nature and giving priority to human. 01HYUNDAI WIA Gun & Armament K2/K1A1 120mm Tank Gun K9 155mm Self-propelled Howitzer Main Armament K9 Characteristics • Longer range, higher rate of fire and more accurate fire •Large multiple slotted muzzle brake •Fume evacuator •Vertically sliding breech mechanism •High strength obturator ring •K2 120mm Tank Gun •K1A1 120mm Tank Gun •Automatic primer feeding magazine • Constant, hydro-pneumatic, independent recoil mechanism Characteristics •Thermal warning device • Fitted on K2 and K1A1 MBT •Automatic projectile loading system • Concentric recoil mechanism • Fume evacuator Specifications • Vertically sliding breech mechanism K2 Breech Opening Motor • High rigidity cradle Model K9 Caliber 155mm Barrel Length 52 Caliber Max. Firing Range 40Km K2 Main Gun Controller Rate of Fire(Max.) 6rds/min (3min) Specifications Rate of Fire(Sustained) 2rds/min (60min) Primer Feeding System Automatic (Revolver Type) Model K2 K1A1 Caliber 120mm 120mm Barrel Length 55 Caliber 44 Caliber Eff. Firing Range
    [Show full text]
  • Tm 9-1015-221-20P
    TM 9-1015-221-20P SUPERSEDES COPY DATED 27 JUNE 1969 TECHNICAL MANUAL ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS AND SPECIAL TOOLS LIST FOR RIFLE, RECOILLESS, 106-MM: M40A2 (1015-00-133-8484) AND M40A4 (1015-00-133-8485) HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MAY 1986 *TM 9-1015-221-20P Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-1015-221-20P Washington, DC 19 May 1986 Organizational Maintenance Repair Parts and Special Tools List for RIFLE, RECOILLESS, 106-MM M40A2 (1015-00-133-8484) AND M40A4 (1015-00-133-8485) Current as of 9 January 1986 REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2 located in back of this manual direct to: Commander, US Army Armament, Munitions and Chemical Command, ATTN: AMSMC-MAS, Rock Island, IL, 61299-6000. A reply will be furnished to you. TABLE OF CONTENTS Illus Page Figure Section I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 Section II. REPAIR PARTS LIST ............................................................................................ 1-1 Group 00 Rifle, recoilless, 106-mm M40A2 11578739 and rifle, recoilless, 106-mm M40A4 11578740 ........................................................... 1-1 1 Group 01 Gun spotting, caliber .50: M8C 7268115 .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Mortars Systems
    M1117 armored security vehicle tar weapon systems include the 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm mortars and related equipment. Fire-control systems, used to calculate mortar missions, include new, improved systems like the mortar fire-con- trol system-heavy (MFCS-H) and the light- weight handheld mortar ballistic com- puter (LHMBC). The M224 60 mm mortar weapon sys- tem is a lightweight, high-angle-of-fire, smooth-bore, manportable, muzzle-loaded mortar with improved rate-of-fire capabili- ties. The M224 consists of the following components: M225 cannon (tube), M170 bipod assembly, M7 baseplate, M8 auxil- tillery combat observation lasing teams Product Manager Excalibur iary baseplate and the M64A1 sight unit. (COLTs) in both heavy and Infantry brigade The Product Manager Excalibur (PM Ex- The M224 fires the complete family of 60 combat teams, the Armored Knight will calibur) is developing Excalibur, a preci- mm ammunition, such as high explosive, combine the proven armored security vehi- sion, autonomously guided, long-range ar- smoke, illumination, infrared illumination cle with the M707 Knight mission equip- tillery system. and practice cartridges. With ranges from ment package. The XM982 Excalibur is a 155 mm preci- 70 meters to 3,500 meters, the M224 meets The resultant M1200 Armored Knight sion-guided artillery round with extended lethality, range and weight requirements will provide COLTs with increased armor range. Already being fielded to warfight- for light forces without an additional trans- protection, payload and agility. Textron ers and successfully employed in combat portation requirement. Marine and Land Systems is presently un- operations, Excalibur uses GPS precision- The M252 81 mm mortar system is a der contract with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • '" •T: ;\U25a0 .//,'/'\U25a0•
    '"' 'I% -'-" :"'' ; ' •-*'< \} '?;.• ; ; .'- / 'THE- INFANTRY CENTEi* _ ,_, ~\ \u0084 '" •t: ;\u25a0 .//,'/'\u25a0• : :: \u25a0: -\u25a0 ; ; \;;:::ft;fpffi; or officers :"/ " .:\u25a0.. -.1 -iwitii-•'' 1 " ",:"-.-;" : ; ../^\u25a0^;/;'r^ ;.- \u25a0•\Oit._ •.;-:\u25a0.-:"\u25a0, ; V V. '¥ '' ' " * •"\u25a0 '• \u25a0 ; \u25a0 ; -: ? '^ \u25a0'\u25a0 \u25a0\u25a0•• ;. ;; ;'.-' ..\u25a0\u25a0/; ? 'S":!t- AhiD; v- .:\u25a0 -v .^>"'-":^;; \u25a0.-\u25a0\u25a0-. |AIHBdIINE INFANTRY REGEMENTS : ' '" '• -^ :': ' .-':•\u25a0 :-\' '\u25a0'- ,"'\u25a0'\u25a0. .",-.' \u25a0'\u25a0\u25a0 •'\u25a0\u25a0 ÜBW«V \ J^CeSCI'TIBWBWIffIRTH.KMI.] ~ ' : \r ACCESSION Nn.^,,,,., „ ...iimri.;. ''/;*/". .. '"' '' ' ' '\u25a0 • '\u25a0 t'" POREGISTR i iiiiiiiiiin'iniiimiiil \u25a0 ' ' '' .. , . '\u25a0\u25a0.'.. ; >\u25a0' '] •,\u25a0\u25a0•\u25a0\u25a0','%"• V- J.UtV, 19S^\ J^\'' ',\u25a0\u25a0'\u25a0'\u25a0' \u25a0\u25a0\u25a0''.\u25a0'"'", - '"\u25a0'\u25a0" * b "Oi-U. ._, II INDEX Letter requesting views of regimental commanders with questionaire -~~-------~----.---~~-~__._­ -Tab I Recapitulation of views of regimental commanders -- Tab J Additional proposals for reorganization of infantry and airborne infantry regiment 3 as expressed by regimental commanders and individual officers - __­ Tab X Replies of regimental commanders and other proposals _ submitted in writing ,____...-_ - Tab L Headquarters ICorps (not included in recapitulation) Headquarters IX Corps (not included in recapitulation) 30th Infantry Regiment (not included in recapitulation) Bth Infantry
    [Show full text]
  • Infantry Rifle Platoon & Squad (FM 7-8)
    FM 7-8 INFANTRY RIFLE PLATOON AND SQUAD HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION – Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. FM 7-8 C1 HEADQUARTERS CHANGE 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 1 March 2001 1. Change FM 7-8, dated 22 April 1992, as follows: REMOVE OLD PAGES INSERT NEW PAGES None 6-1 through 6-66 2. A star (*) marks new or changed material. 3. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication. This Publication is available on the General Dennis J. Reimer Training And Doctrine Digital Library www.adtdl.army.mil DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTIONApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited. C1, fm 7-8 1 March 2001 By Order of the Secretary of the Army: ERIC K. SHINSEKI General, United States Army Chief of Staff Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army 0104302 DISTRIBUTION: Active Army, Army National Guard, and U.S. Army Reserve: To be distributed in accordance with the initial distribution number 110782, requirements for FM 7-8. FM 7-8 PREFACE This manual provides doctrine, tactics, techniques and procedures on how infantry rifle platoons and squads fight. Infantry rifle platoons and squads include infantry, airborne, air assault, ranger, and light infantry platoons and squads. This manual supersedes FM 7-8, Infantry Platoon and Squad dated April 1981, as well as FM 7-70, The Light In fantry platoon and Squad dated September 1986, and is aligned with the Army’s AirLand Battle doctrine. It is not intended to be a stand-alone publica- tion. An understanding of FM 7-10, The Infantry Rifle Company, and FM 7-20, The Infantry Battalion, is essential.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arab-Israeli Military Balance
    THE ARAB-ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE Conventional Realities and Asymmetric Challenges Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy And Aram Nerguizian [email protected] Revised June 29, 2010 Please note that this document is a working draft and will be revised regularly. To comment, or to provide suggestions and corrections, please email the authors at [email protected] and [email protected]. Cordesman & Nerguizian: The Arab-Israeli Military Balance 6/29/10 Page 2 Introduction The Arab-Israeli military balance has steadily evolved in recent years to put more and more emphasis on irregular or asymmetric warfare, and the use of military force for political and ideological leverage – both inside the countries involved and in dealing with their neighbors. Most of this focus is driven by the steady strengthening of Hezbollah, and Hamas in Gaza, but it also includes a nascent nuclear arms race between Israel and Iran in which Israel seems to be strengthening both its long-range nuclear and conventional attack capabilities and is clearly strengthening its missile defense capabilities. At the same time, the conventional arms race has continued to narrow down to two countries. While Egyptian, Jordanian and Lebanese military development should not be ignored, the overall balance continues to center on evolving Israeli-Syrian confrontation and brinksmanship in the region. These shifts do not mean the conventional balance has lost its importance. The fact that Israel is at peace with Egypt and Jordan, and has a significant conventional superiority over Syria, has both been a major factor in stabilizing the peace process and deterring conventional clashes and wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Bill 33 By: Senator James of the 35Th
    13 LC 21 1916 Senate Bill 33 By: Senator James of the 35th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 To amend Part 2 of Article 4 of Chapter 11 of Title 16 of the Official Code of Georgia 2 Annotated, relating to possession of dangerous weapons, so as to define certain terms; to 3 prohibit the possession of an assault weapon; to prohibit the possession of an oversize 4 magazine; to prohibit the possession with intent to sell, sale, or transportation of such 5 weapons; to provide penalties; to provide an effective date; to repeal conflicting laws; and 6 for other purposes. 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA: 8 SECTION 1. 9 Part 2 of Article 4 of Chapter 11 of Title 16 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, 10 relating to possession of dangerous weapons, is amended by revising Code Section 11 16-11-121, relating to definitions, as follows: 12 "16-11-121. 13 As used in this part, the term: 14 (1) 'Assault weapon' means: 15 (A) A semiautomatic rifle able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the 16 following: 17 (i) A folding or telescoping stock; 18 (ii) A pistol grip; 19 (iii) A bayonet mount; 20 (iv) A flash suppressor or a threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash 21 suppressor; or 22 (v) A grenade launcher; 23 (B) A semiautomatic pistol with detachable magazines and one or more of the 24 following: 25 (i) A magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip; 26 (ii) A threaded barrel designed to accommodate a barrel extender, handgrip, or flash 27 suppressor; S.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Mortars Systems Product Manager Close Combat Systems
    AMMUNITION mortar with improved rate-of-fire capabili- bly, the M9 baseplate and the M67 sight. ties. The M224 consists of the following The 120 mm battalion mortar system pro- The Program Executive Office for Am- components: M225 cannon (tube), M170 vides close-in and continuous indirect-fire munition (PEO Ammo) has the mission to bipod assembly, M7 baseplate, M8 auxil- support to maneuver forces and can rap- develop and procure conventional leap- iary baseplate and the M64A1 sight unit. idly respond to threats. The battalion mor- ahead munitions to increase combat power The M224 fires the complete family of 60 tar platoon must move frequently to avoid to warfighters. Project managers within mm ammunition, such as high explosive, counterfire and maintain continuous fire the PEO include: Combat Ammunition smoke, illumination, infrared illumination support to advancing friendly forces. Systems, Close Combat Systems Maneu- and practice cartridges. With ranges from The XM326 Stowage Kit (Quick Stow) ver Ammunition Systems and Joint Ser- 70 meters to 3,500 meters, the M224 meets is a 120 mm mortar improvement. The vices. lethality, range and weight requirements powered device will allow a 120 mm mor- Project Manager Combat Ammunition for light forces without an additional trans- tar to be carried as a single unit. Systems (PM CAS), for example, is respon- portation requirement. The M313 Training Insert is a subcaliber sible for equipping soldiers with all tube- insert used to reduce the life-cycle training launched, indirect-fire munitions and mor- costs of the M120/M121 battalion mortar tar weapons systems for the Army’s cur- system.
    [Show full text]