DOCSLIB.ORG

Nota Lepidopterologica Index to Volumen 31 by Taxon and Author Names, with Publication Dates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nota Lepidopterologica Index to Volumen 31 by Taxon and Author Names, with Publication Dates ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 31 (2): 297-299 301 Nota lepidopterologica index to volumen 31 by taxon and author names, with publication dates Publication dates of volume 31 No. 1: p. 1-162: 15. 05. 2008; No. 2: p. 163-299: 15. 11. 2008 Contents Agassiz, D. 2008 (15. xi.). Anthophila massaicae sp. n. (Choreutidae) a remarkable case of par- allel evolution. 31 (2): 227-230. Altermatt, F. 2008 (15. v.). A new species of Agdistis Hübner, 1825 from Tajikistan (Pteropho- ridae). 31 (1): 65-68. Bella, S. 2008 (15. v.). Caryocolum siculum sp. n. (Gelechiidae), feeding on Gypsophila (Caryo- phyllaceae) in Sicily. 31 (1): 69-75. Benyamini, D. 2008 (15.xi.). Is Eiichloe falloui Allard, 1867 (Pieridae) the butterfly with the longest diapause? 31 (2): 293-295. Bidzilya, O. & Karshoh, O. 2008 (15.xi.). New data on Anomologini from Palaearctic Asia (Gelechiidae). 31 (2): 199-213. Coene, H. A. & Vis. R. 2008 (15.xi.). Contribution to the butterfly fauna of Yunnan, China (Hes- peroidea, Papilionoidea). 31 (2): 231-262. Dincä, v., Székely, L., Kovacs, S., Kovacs, Z. & Vila, R. 2008 (15. xi.). Pyrgus andromedae (Wallengren, 1853) (Hesperiidae) in the Romanian Carpathians. 31 (2): 263-272. Dincä, V. & Vila, R. 2008 (15. v.). Improving the knowledge on Romanian Rhopalocera, includ- ing the rediscovery of Polyoimnatus amandus (Schneider, 1792) (Lycaenidae) and an ap- plication of DNA-based identification. 31 (1): 3-23. Dolinskaya, I. V 2008 (15.xi.). Taxonomic variation in larval mandibular structure in Palaearctic Notodontidae (Noctuoidea). 31 (2): 165-177. Gaedike, R. 2008 (15. v.). On the generic affiliation of the taxon efßexa Xiao & Li, 2006 (Ti- neidae). 31(1): 77. Gaedike, R. 2008 (15. v.). Nota lepidopterologica indices to volumes 1 to 30 by taxon and author names, with publication dates. 31 (1): 79-162. Hofmann, A. & Kia-Hofmann, T. 2008 (15. v.). Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Zygaena Fabricius, 1775 in Iran (Zygaenidae). Part VIII: Bionomics of high-mountain spe- cies in the Alborz Mountains and adjacent areas (introduction; Z. speciosa, Z. cacuminwn). 31 (1): 25-52. Ponomarenko, M. G. 2008 (15.xi.). Functional morphology of the male genitalia in Gelechiidae (Lepidoptera) and its significance for phylogenetic analysis. 31 (2): 179-198. Schmid, J. 2008 (15. xi.). The identity of Pammene engadinensis Miiller-Rutz, 1920 (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae, Grapholitini). 31 (2): 223-225. Skovkoon, D. F. 2008 (15.xi.). On the rediscovery of Ethmia discrepitella (Rebel, 1901) with remarks on brachyptery in females of Ethmia (Ethmiidae). 31 (2): 215-221. Solovyev, A. V 2008 (15. v.). Review of the genus Phocoderma Butler, 1886 (Zygaenoidea: Li- macodidae). 31 (1): 53-63. Trofimova, T A. 2008 (15.xi.). Systematic notes on Dasorgyia Staudinger, 1881, Dicallomera Butler, 1881, and Lachana Moore, 1888 (Lymantriidae). 31 (2): 273-291. Zlatkov, B. 2008 (15.xi.). Dichrorampha typhlodes (Meyrick, 1931), syn. n. of Dichrorampha acuminatana (Lienig & Zeller, 1846) (Tortricidae). 31 (2): 297-299. Book reviews. 31 (1): 24, 64, 76; 31 (2): 178, 226. ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at 302 Zlatkov: Dichrorampha typhlodes (Meyrick) synonymized Index of taxonomical changes alpherakii Grum-Grzhimailo, 1891 (Dasychira), LT; comb, n.; now: Lachana - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.):31(2):285 atraphaxi sp. n. {Spiniductellus) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15. xi.): 31 (2): 211 Dasorgyia Staudinger, 1881 [October-December] (Lymantriidae), syn. n. to Dicallomera Butler, 1881 [February] - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 274 desertus sp. n. {Spiniphallellus) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 202 discrepitella (Rebel, 1901) (Ethmia), LT - Skovkoon 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 216 efflexa Xiao & Li, 2006 (Montetinea), comb, n.; now: Crypsithyris - Gaedike 2008 (15. v.) 31 (1): 77 engadinensis Miiller-Rutz, 1920 (Pammene), syn. n. of Pammene agnotana Rebel, 1914 - Schmid 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 224 flavonigrum sp. n. {Spiniductellus) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 211 fuscescens sp. n. {Spiniphallellus) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 208 grumi Staudinger, 1901 {Dasorgyia), LT - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 287 kulu sp. n. {Lachana) - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 288 massaicae sp. n. {Anthophila) - Agassiz 2008 (15. xi.): 31 (2): 227 pumila Staudinger, 1881 {Dasychira), comb, n.; now: Dicallomera - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 275 selenophora Staudinger, 1887 {Dasychira), LT; comb, n.; now: Lachana - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.):31 (2): 282 s/cM/wm sp. n. (Carjoco/wm) - Bella 2008 (15. V.) 31 (1): 69 sincera Kozhantshikov, 1950 {Gynaephora), comb, n., now: Lachana - Trofimova 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 283 Spiniductellus gen. n. (Gelechiidae) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 220 Spiniphallellus gen. n. (Gelechiidae) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 201 staudingeri Bang-Haas, 1938 (f. of Lachana alpherakii Grum-Grzhimailo, 1891), LT - Tro- fimova 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 288 stonisi sp. n. {Spiniphallellus) - Bidzilya & Karsholt 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 206 tugai sp. n. {Agdistis) - Altormait 2008 (15.v.) 31 (1): 65 typhlodes Meyrick, 1931 {Hemimene), LT; syn. n. of Dichrorampha acuminatana (Lienig & Zeller, 1846) - Zlatkov 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 297 witti sp. n. {Phocoderma) - Solovyev 2008 (15.v.) 31 (1): 59 xizangensis Huang, 2000 (ssp. of Clossiana gong (Oberthür, 1884), syn. n. of Clossiana gong charis (Oberthür, 1891) - Coene & Vis 2008 (15.xi.): 31 (2): 240.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 149:Generic 69–88 placement (2011) of the Neotropical species of “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae)... 69 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2382 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Generic placement of the Neotropical species of “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae), with a remarkable matrivorous species from the Peruvian Andes B. Christian Schmidt1,†, Josef J. De Freina2,‡ 1 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6 2 Eduard-Schmid Str. 10, D-81541, Munich, Germany † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C3C5392A-EBF8-41B9-99BE-364A8C2FBB7F ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D77A3D39-F4A4-4116-8279-5F6534826BE8 Corresponding authors: B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Josef J. De Freina ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Lafontaine | Received 10 September 2011 | Accepted 15 November 2011 | Published 24 November 2011 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6476A2E7-14C0-4E6E-B21E-4B63375BF605 Citation: Schmidt BC, De Freina JJ (2011) Generic placement of the Neotropical species of “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae), with a remarkable matrivorous species from the Peruvian Andes. In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths III. ZooKeys 149: 69–88. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2382 Abstract Phragmatobia Stephens is briefly reviewed and a diagnosis is provided. The South American species cur- rently placed in Phragmatobia Stephens are revised to two new genera, Andesobia Schmidt and De Freina, gen. n., and Patagobia Schmidt and De Freina, gen. n. (subtribe Spilosomina). Both Andesobia and Patagobia exhibit adaptations to high altitude habitats, including micropterous females in Andesobia (Patagobia females are unknown) and diurnal flight of males.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?
    Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae) from Iran, with New Records
    J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (2021) Vol. 23(5): 1073-1090 Review of the Tribe Eryciini Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae) from Iran, with New Records F. Seyyedi-Sahebari1*, S. Khaghaninia2, and A. A. Talebi 3 ABSTRACT The present paper contains a review of the tribe Eryciini (Tachinidae: Exoristinae) that occur in Iran. Twenty-six species belonging to 15 genera are reviewed. The collected data on 20 species are provided. Of these, seven genera and 16 species are newly recorded. Distribution and host information are briefly summarized. The diagnostic characters of the new records species are given. The key to the species found in Iran is also provided. Keywords: Taxonomy, Fauna of Eryciini, Diptera, Parasitoid flies. INTRODUCTION at most with 1-3 setae; first postsutural supra-alar setae longer and stronger than the Tachinidae is the second largest dipteran notopleural setae and first postsutural intra- family with more than 8,500 described alar seta, middorsal depression on species, distributed worldwide (O’Hara et abdominal syntergite 1+2 usually extending al., 2020). The larvae are endoparasitoids of to posterior margin of that segment; true other arthropods, mainly insects. Exoristinae binding membrane between sternites 6-7 in represent one of the largest subfamilies in males is wide; sensilla trichodea on sternite the Tachinidae, containing seven tribes in 5 existing in most genera (Tschorsnig and the Palearctic Region. Eryciini is a large and Herting, 1994). diverse tribe with wide distribution in the Although the history of investigation on world (Herting, 1984; O’Hara and Wood, tachinid fauna of Iran is not very long, there 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Moniioring Scheme
    MOTH MONIIORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre 1/1/1/ National Boord of Waters and the Environment Nordic Council of Ministers /////// Helsinki 1 994 Environmental Report 8 MOTH MONITORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre National Board of Waters and the Environment Helsinki 1994 Published by Environment Data Centre (EDC) National Board of Waters and the Environment P.O.BOX 250 FIN—001 01 Helsinki FINLAND Tel. +358—0—73 14 4211 Fax. +358—0—7314 4280 Internet address: [email protected] Edited by Guy Söderman, EDC Technical editng by Päivi Tahvanainen, EDC This handbook has been circulated for comments to the members of the project group for moth monitoring in the Nordic countries under the auspices of the Monitoring and Data Group of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Cover photo © Tarla Söderman Checking of installation of light trap at Vilsandi National Park in Estonia. Printed by Painotalo MIKTOR Ky, Helsinki 1 994 ISBN 951—47—9982—8 ISSN 0788—3765 CONTENTS .4 INTRODUCTION 5 PART 1: OBJECTIVES 7 1 Short term objectives 7 2 Medium-long term objectives 8 3 Additional objectives 8 4 Specific goals 9 5 Network design 9 5.1 Geographical coverage 9 5.2 Biotopes coverage 10 PART II: METRODOLOGY 11 1 Technical equipments and use 11 1.1 Structure of Iight traps 11 1.2 Field installation 13 1.3 Structure ofbait trap 14 1.4 Documentation of sites 15 1.5 Timing the light traps 15 1.6 Sampling procedures 15 2 Sample handling 16 2.1 Prestoring 16 2.2 Posting 16
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoid Moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae) of North-East Kazakhstan (Pavlodar Region)
    Ukrainian Journal of Ecology Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2017, 7(2), 142–164, doi: 10.15421/2017_32 ORIGINAL ARTICLE UDC 595.786 Noctuoid moths (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae) of North-East Kazakhstan (Pavlodar Region) S.V. Titov1, A.V. Volynkin2,3, V.V. Dubatolov4, M. Černila5, S.M. Reznichenko6 & V.S. Bychkov7 1 The Research Centre for Environmental 'Monitoring', S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Altai State University, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, RF-656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, RF-634050, Tomsk, Russia 4 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, RF-630091, Novosibirsk, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 5 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] 6 Shcherbakty branch of the Republican methodical center of phytosanitary diagnostics and forecasts, Sovetov 44, KZ-141000, Sharbakty, Shcherbakty distr., Pavlodar Region. E-mail: [email protected] 7 Institute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Margulan, 44 Avenue Dostyk, st. Shevchenko 28, KZ-050010, Almaty, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 02.04.2017. Accepted: 23.05.2017 The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae, Nolidae and Noctuidae of Pavlodar Region (North-East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 480 species (100 species of Erebidae, 8 species of Nolidae and 372 species of Noctuidae), 393 species are reported for the region for the first time. The map of collecting localities and pictures of the main landscapes of the region are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of the Kingston Study Area
    Moths of the Kingston Study Area Last updated 30 July 2015 by Mike Burrell This checklist contains the 783 species known to have occurred within the Kingston Study. Major data sources include KFN bioblitzes, an earlier version created by Gary Ure (2013) and the Queen’s University Biological Station list by Kit Muma (2008). For information about contributing your sightings or to download the latest version of this checklist, please visit: http://kingstonfieldnaturalists.org/moths/moths.html Contents Superfamily: Tineoidea .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Family: Tineidae ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Subfamily: Tineinae .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Family: Psychidae ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Subfamily: Psychinae ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Superfamily: Gracillarioidea ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Family: Gracillariidae ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Lepidoptera of Bucharest and Its Surroundings (Romania)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Décembre Vol. LIV (2) pp. 461–512 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0028-9 THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BUCHAREST AND ITS SURROUNDINGS (ROMANIA) LEVENTE SZÉKELY Abstract. This study presents a synthesis of the current knowledge regarding the Lepidoptera fauna of Bucharest and the surrounding areas within a distance up to 50 kilometers around the Romanian capital. Data about the fauna composition are presented: the results of the research work beginning with the end of the 19th century, as well the results of the research work carried out in the last 15 years. The research initiated and done by the author himself, led to the identification of 180 species which were unknown in the past. Even if the natural habitats from this region have undergone through radical changes in the 20th century, the area still preserves a quite rich and interesting Lepidoptera fauna. The forests provide shelter to rich populations of the hawk moth Dolbina elegans A. Bang-Haas, 1912, one of the rarest Sphingidae in Europe, and some other species with high faunistical and zoogeographical value as: Noctua haywardi (Tams, 1926) (it is new record for the Romanian fauna from this area), Catocala dilecta (Hübner, 1808), Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]), Chrysodeixis chalcites (Esper, [1789]), Aedia leucomelas (Linnaeus, 1758), and Hecatera cappa (Hübner, [1809]). We also present and discuss the current status of the protected Lepidoptera species from the surroundings of the Romanian capital for the first time. Résumé. Ce travail représente une synthèse des connaissances actuelles concernant la faune de lépidoptères de Bucarest et de ses zones limitrophes sur un rayon de 50 km autour de la capitale de la Roumanie.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicallomera) Fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lymantriinae), En Galicia (NO España
    Burbug, 12 ISSN: 2444-0329 Gynaephora (Dicallomera) fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lymantriinae), en Galicia (NO España) Juan José Pino Pérez*& Rubén Pino Pérez ** 4 de julio de 2015 Resumen En esta nota informamos de la captura de varios ejemplares del limán- trido Gynaephora (Dicallomera) fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758) en los muni- cipios de Cervantes (Lugo) y A Veiga (Orense) (Galicia, NO España), habitando en dos formaciones boscosas tosociológicamente distintas. Abstract In this paper we report the discovery of Lymantriinae Gynaephora (Dicallomera) fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758), in the municipality of Cervantes (Lugo) and A Veiga (Orense) (Galicia, NW Spain), inhabiting in two forests with dierent phytosociological formations. Palabras clave: Gynaephora (Dicallomera) fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758), co- rología, fenología, sintaxonomía, Lugo, Orense, Galicia, NO España. Key words: Gynaephora (Dicallomera) fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758), choro- logy, phenology, sintaxonomy, Lugo, Orense, Galicia, NW Spain. 1. Introducción En Pino et al.(in litteris [3]) se señalan algunas referencias relacionadas con el limántrido Gynaephora (Dicallomera) fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758), que ha sido citado con cierta rareza en la Península Ibérica y de ellas, muchas son menciones anteriores a la década de 1960. En el artículo citado se menciona que, *A Fraga, 6, Corzáns. 36457, Salvaterra de Miño. Pontevedra. [email protected] **Sierra Poniente 1B, 32. 36940, Cangas. Pontevedra. [email protected] 1 Pino & Pino: Gynaephora fascelina en Galicia ISSN: 2444-0329 hay citas antiguas de Ribbe (1910: 219) de la Sierra de Alfácar (Granada), de Zapater y Korb (1892: 114) de Rincón de Ademuz, Castiel (Valencia), y los mismos autores la suponen en la Sierra de Albarracín (Teruel), y por Seebold (1898: 123), de Bilbao (Vizca- ya), como poco frecuente; Fernández (1920), la indica de Oviedo.
    [Show full text]
  • Caterpillars on the Foliage of Conifers in the Northeastern United States 1 Life Cycles and Food Plants
    INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Coniferous forests are important features of the North American landscape. In the Northeast, balsam fir, spruces, or even pines may dominate in the more northern forests. Southward, conifers still may be prevalent, although the pines become increasingly important. In dry, sandy areas, such as Cape Cod of Massachusetts and the Pine Barrens of New Jersey, hard pines abound in forests composed of relatively small trees. Conifers are classic symbols of survival in harsh environments. Forests of conifers provide not only beautiful scenery, but also livelihood for people. Coniferous trees are a major source of lumber for the building industry. Their wood can be processed to make paper, packing material, wood chips, fence posts, and other products. Certain conifers are cultivated for landscape plants and, of course, Christmas trees. Trees of coniferous forests also supply shelter or food for many species of vertebrates, invertebrates, and even plants. Insects that call these forests home far outnumber other animals and plants. Because coniferous forests tend to be dominated by one to a few species of trees, they are especially susceptible to injury during outbreaks of insects such as the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana, the fall hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria fiscellaria, or the pitch pine looper, Lambdina pellucidaria. Trees that are defoliated by insects suffer reduced growth and sometimes even death. Trees stressed by defoliation, drought, or mechanical injury, are generally more susceptible to attack by wood-boring beetles, diseases, and other organisms. These secondary pests also may kill trees. Stress or tree death can have a negative economic impact upon forest industries.
    [Show full text]