DOCSLIB.ORG

Status of Amaranthus Species in Ohio Crop Production Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status of Amaranthus Species in Ohio Crop Production Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Status of Amaranthus Species in Ohio Crop Production Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samantha N. Konkle, B.S. Horticulture and Crop Science Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2015 Thesis Committee: Dr. Mark M. Loux, Advisor Dr. Laura Lindsey Dr. Kristen Mercer Copyright by Samantha N. Konkle 2015 Abstract Studies were conducted in 2012, 2013, and 2014 with the objectives of: 1) Determining the frequency and distribution of horseweed (Conyza canadensis), giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), and three Amaranthus species, Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), in Ohio soybean fields at the end of the growing season; 2) Determining the response of Ohio Amaranthus species to herbicide site of action groups 2, 9, and 14; and 3) Developing herbicide-based management strategies for herbicide-resistant redroot pigweed. A survey was conducted in 2012, 2013, and 2014 in 52 Ohio counties just prior to soybean harvest, and each soybean field encountered was assessed for infestation level of horseweed, giant ragweed, and Amaranthus species. Amaranthus species were the least frequent in comparison with horseweed and giant ragweed in all three years of the survey. Palmer amaranth was not observed on the survey in any of the three years, but seed samples were collected from growers and provided by agribusinesses. Waterhemp infestations were observed in four and ten fields in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Redroot pigweed infestations occurred in 34, 19, and 2 fields in 2012, 2013, and 2014, ii respectively. There was no pattern for the distribution of these infestations throughout the state. A greenhouse herbicide screen was conducted using Amaranthus species samples from the 2013 and 2014 surveys to determine response of populations to glyphosate (site 9), fomesafen (site 14), and imazethapyr (site 2). The experiment was conducted twice in 2013 and once in 2014. Results varied across the two 2013 experiments, as herbicides were more active in the second experiment than in the first. Redroot pigweed populations exhibited resistance to site 2 and 14 herbicides in all three experiments. Glyphosate resistance was inconsistent between the 2013 experiments, but was observed in 2014. Redroot populations also exhibited multiple resistance for sites 2 and 14 in 2013 and 2014, and three-way resistance occurred in the second 2013 and the 2014 experiment. Waterhemp populations were resistant to sites 2 and 9 in all experiments, but resistance to site 14 was less consistent. Multiple resistance also occurred in waterhemp populations. In 2013, this was seen only for sites 2 and 9, but in 2014, multiple resistance was seen for all combinations of site 2, 9, and 14. None of the three 2013 Palmer amaranth populations were glyphosate-resistant, but several 2014 populations were. All Palmer amaranth populations in all experiments showed resistance to site 2, and resistance to site 14 was inconsistent in 2013 but was also observed in the 2014 experiment. Three-way resistance and resistance to site 2 and 14 and site 9 and 14 were observed in the 2014 populations. Two field studies were conducted in 2013 and 2014 to assess control of redroot pigweed using a number of herbicides with residual activity, and compare control between currently available herbicide programs and prospective herbicide programs for iii new herbicide resistance traits. The results of the residual study showed the most effective late-season control with three-way herbicide mixes, while the least effective control was provided by 2,4-D and metribuzin applied individually or together. Preemergence treatments in the herbicide programs study mostly provided over 90% control at 21 DAT, but many treatments showed less control starting at 42 DAT. Several preemergence + EPOST and preemergence + LPOST treatments, including a preemergence application of pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin followed by various tank mixtures postemergence, provided 90% or greater late-season control. An advantage for either current herbicide programs or prospective herbicide programs was not observed in either study. iv Vita January 12, 1991 ................................................................... Born – Columbus, Ohio December 2012 ..................................................................... B.S. Agriculture, The Ohio State University January 2013 to present ........................................................ Graduate Research Associate, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University Field of Study Major Field: Horticulture and Crop Science Specialization: Weed Science v Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................... ii Vita ................................................................................................................ v List of Figures ............................................................................................... viii List of Tables ................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1: Literature Review ........................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Distribution characteristics of Ohio Amaranthus spp. Introduction ....................................................................................... 16 Objectives ......................................................................................... 17 Materials and Methods ...................................................................... 17 Results and Discussion ..................................................................... 19 Bibliography ..................................................................................... 22 Chapter 3: Assessment of herbicide resistance in Ohio Amaranthus spp. Introduction ....................................................................................... 31 Objectives ......................................................................................... 33 Materials and Methods ...................................................................... 33 Results and Discussion ..................................................................... 35 Bibliography ..................................................................................... 42 vi Chapter 4: Control of Redroot Pigweed Utilizing Current and Prospective Herbicide Technologies Introduction ....................................................................................... 49 Objectives ......................................................................................... 51 Materials and Methods ...................................................................... 51 Results and Discussion ..................................................................... 53 Bibliography ..................................................................................... 57 Thesis Bibliography ...................................................................................... 70 vii List of Figures Figure 2.1 All counties surveyed in 2012, 2013, and 2014 .......................... 23 Figure 2.2 Distribution of known Palmer amaranth and waterhemp populations in Ohio in 2012 ... ........................................................................................................... 28 Figure 2.3 Distribution of known Palmer amaranth and waterhemp populations in Ohio in 2013 ... ........................................................................................................... 29 Figure 2.4 Distribution of known Palmer amaranth and waterhemp populations in Ohio in 2014 ... ........................................................................................................... 30 viii List of Tables Table 2.1 Percentage of soybean fields infested by species in end-of-season survey of 52 Ohio Counties ........................................................................................................... 24 Table 2.2 Number of infestations from the survey by county and species for 2012, 2013, and 2014 .................................................................................................................... 25 Table 2.3 Number of populations collected/submitted for determination of herbicide resistance ................................................................................................................... 27 Table 3.1 Response of 2013 Amaranthus spp. population to herbicides in the greenhouse ........... ....................................................................................................................... 43 Table 3.2 Response of 2014 Amaranthus spp. populations to herbicides in the greenhouse ........... ....................................................................................................................... 45 Table 3.3 Percentage of 2013 Palmer, waterhemp, and redroot populations exhibiting resistance to site 2, 9, and 14 herbicides at 1X and 4X rates and populations exhibiting multiple resistance at 1X rates .................................................................................. 47 Table 3.4 Percentage of 2014 Palmer, waterhemp, and redroot populations exhibiting resistance to site 2, 9, and 14 herbicides at 1X and 4X rates and populations exhibiting multiple resistance at 1X rates .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PPO2 Mutations in Amaranthus Palmeri:Implications on Cross-Resistance
    agriculture Article PPO2 Mutations in Amaranthus palmeri: Implications on Cross-Resistance Pâmela Carvalho-Moore 1,2 , Gulab Rangani 1, James Heiser 3, Douglas Findley 4, Steven J. Bowe 4 and Nilda Roma-Burgos 1,* 1 Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA; [email protected] (P.C.-M.); [email protected] (G.R.) 2 Former Cell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA 3 Fisher Delta Research Center, College of Agriculture, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873, USA; [email protected] 4 BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; douglas.fi[email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (S.J.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In Arkansas, resistance to protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicides in Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. is mainly due to target site mutations. Although A. palmeri PPO-mutations are well investigated, the cross-resistance that each ppo mutant endows to weed populations is not yet well understood. We aimed to evaluate the response of PPO-resistant A. palmeri accessions, harboring the ppo2 mutations DG210 and G399A, to multiple PPO-inhibiting herbicides. Six resistant and one susceptible field accessions were subjected to a dose–response assay with fomesafen, and selected survivors from different fomesafen doses were genotyped to characterize the mutation profile. The level of resistance to fomesafen was determined and a cross-resistance assay was conducted with 1 Citation: Carvalho-Moore, P.; and 2 times the labeled doses of selected PPO herbicides. The accession with higher predicted dose Rangani, G.; Heiser, J.; Findley, D.; to control 50% of the population (ED50) had a higher frequency of DG210-homozygous survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Amaranthus Palmeri) in 2,4-D , Glufosinate-, and Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean
    Weed Technology Management of glyphosate-resistant Palmer – www.cambridge.org/wet amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in 2,4-D , glufosinate-, and glyphosate-resistant soybean 1 2 3 4 Research Article Chandrima Shyam , Parminder S. Chahal , Amit J. Jhala and Mithila Jugulam 1 2 Cite this article: Shyam C, Chahal PS, Jhala AJ, Graduate Student, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; Postdoctoral Research 3 Jugulam M (2021) Management of glyphosate- Associate, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; Associate resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus Professor, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA and palmeri) in 2,4-D–, glufosinate-, and 4Professor, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 35:136–143. doi: 10.1017/wet.2020.91 Abstract Received: 7 May 2020 Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a problematic, annual broadleaf weed in Revised: 7 July 2020 soybean production fields in Nebraska and many other states in the United States. Soybean Accepted: 29 July 2020 TM First published online: 18 August 2020 resistant to 2,4-D, glyphosate, and glufosinate (Enlist E3 ) has been developed and was first grown commercially in 2019. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the effect of herbicide Associate Editor: programs applied PRE, PRE followed by (fb) late-POST (LPOST), and early-POST (EPOST) fb Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri LPOST on GR Palmer amaranth control, density, and biomass reduction, soybean injury, and ’ Nomenclature: yield. Field experiments were conducted near Carleton, NE, in 2018, and 2019 in a grower sfield 2,4-D chlorimuron-ethyl; cloransulam-methyl; infested with GR Palmer amaranth in 2,4-D–, glyphosate-, and glufosinate-resistant soybean.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Addition to the Alien Flora of Tunisia, Amaranthus Spinosus L. (Amaranthaceae S.L.), with Notes on A
    Acta Bot. Croat. 78 (1), 91–94, 2019 CODEN: ABCRA 25 DOI: 10.2478/botcro-2018-0009 ISSN 0365-0588 eISSN 1847-8476 Short communication A new addition to the alien flora of Tunisia, Amaranthus spinosus L. (Amaranthaceae s.l.), with notes on A. diacanthus Raf. Duilio Iamonico1*, Ridha El Mokni2,3 1 University of Rome Sapienza, Department PDTA, Section Environment and Landscape, via Flaminia 72, 00196 Rome, Italy 2 Laboratory of Botany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Sciences of Bizerta, University of Carthage, Jarzouna-7021, Bizerta, Tunisia 3 Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, University of Monastir, BP. N° 207, Avenue Avicenna, Monastir-5000, Tunisia Abstract – Amaranthus spinosus L. (Amaranthaceae s.l.), a species native to the Neotropics, has been found in four localities (Bizerta, Bir Bouregba, Hammamet, and Nabeul) of N. Tunisia. Our discovery represents the first record at national level, and the second one for N. Africa. Morphological characters and ecological data are given. Nomencla- tural notes are provided for the name A. diacanthus, which was regarded by some authors as heterotypic synonym of A. spinosus. A neotype is designated in the present paper based on a specimen preserved at LSU. Keywords: alien species, Amaranthus, neophyte, typification Introduction The genus Amaranthus L. (Amaranthaceae Juss.) com- Amaranthus spinosus, which is recorded in many countries prises about 70 mostly annual, monoecious and dioecious of central and southern parts of the continent, while in the species, of which approximately 40 are native in America north it occurs only in Egypt. As part of an ongoing no- (see e.g., Costea et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Identification, Phylogenetic Analysis and Detection of Herbicide
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Species identifcation, phylogenetic analysis and detection of herbicide‑resistant biotypes of Amaranthus based on ALS and ITS Han Xu1*, Xubin Pan1, Cong Wang1, Yan Chen1, Ke Chen1, Shuifang Zhu1 & Rieks D. van Klinken2 The taxonomically challenging genus Amaranthus (Family Amaranthaceae) includes important agricultural weed species that are being spread globally as grain contaminants. We hypothesized that the ALS gene will help resolve these taxonomic challenges and identify potentially harmful resistant biotypes. We obtained 153 samples representing 26 species from three Amaranthus subgenera and included in that incorporated ITS, ALS (domains C, A and D) and ALS (domains B and E) sequences. Subgen. Albersia was well supported, but subgen. Amaranthus and subgen. Acnida were not. Amaranthus tuberculatus, A. palmeri and A. spinosus all showed diferent genetic structuring. Unique SNPs in ALS ofered reliable diagnostics for most of the sampled Amaranthus species. Resistant ALS alleles were detected in sixteen A. tuberculatus samples (55.2%), eight A. palmeri (27.6%) and one A. arenicola (100%). These involved Ala122Asn, Pro197Ser/Thr/Ile, Trp574Leu, and Ser653Thr/Asn/Lys substitutions, with Ala122Asn, Pro197Thr/Ile and Ser653Lys being reported in Amaranthus for the frst time. Moreover, diferent resistant mutations were present in diferent A. tuberculatus populations. In conclusion, the ALS gene is important for species identifcation, investigating population genetic diversity and understanding resistant evolution within the genus Amaranthus. Amaranthus (Family Amaranthaceae) is a cosmopolitan genus with at least 70 species, including ancient culti- vated plants such as the grains Amaranthus cruentus, A. caudatus and A. hypochondriacus, the leafy vegetable and ornamental A.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmer Amaranth Amaranthus Palmeri Reviewer Affiliation/Organization Date (Mm/Dd/Yyyy) Roger Becker University of Minnesota 8/08/2014
    MN NWAC Risk Common Name Latin Name Assessment Worksheet (04-2011) Palmer Amaranth Amaranthus palmeri Reviewer Affiliation/Organization Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Roger Becker University of Minnesota 8/08/2014 Box Question Answer Outcome 1 Is the plant species or genotype non-native to Yes, non-native in Minnesota. Is native to the southern Yes. Go to box 3. Minnesota? U.S. and Mexico; native to North America. 2 Does the plant species pose significant human or livestock concerns or has the potential to significantly harm agricultural production? A. Does the plant have toxic qualities that pose a significant risk to livestock, wildlife, or people? B. Does the plant cause significant financial losses associated with decreased yields, reduced quality, or increased production costs? 3 Is the plant species, or a related species, Yes. Palmer amaranth is a severe problem in summer Yes. Go to Box 6. documented as being a problem elsewhere? climates similar to Minnesota. (see Hager 2013; Hartzler 2014a; and Legleiter and Johnson 2013). It has not been documented as a problem in states with winter climates similar to Minnesota, but it is anticipated it will do very well since it is an annual with a seedbank and seedlings that have performed well in states with freezing winter temperatures, and portions of the growing season in Minnesota are similar to locations further south where Palmer amaranth is a severe problem. 4 Is the plant species’ life history & Growth Yes, documented in disparate articles, but oddly no Blue text is provided as requirements understood? classic biology of Palmer amaranth review article additional information could be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Grain Amaranths Amaranthus Spp. (Amaranthaceae)
    Grain Amaranths Amaranthus spp. (Amaranthaceae) Klaus Ammann and Jonathan Gressel Manuscript 17. October 2007 Introduction Amaranthus could be a valuable alternative crop due to its high nutritional content, the many desirable traits expressed by the grain amaranths – and the unexplored potential of the wild relatives. Unlike the traditional monocot grains, the grain amaranths possess lysine in nutritionally significant levels. In addition, specific varieties of grain amaranths tolerate drought and heat, and, as a result, lessen the demand for costly irrigation. Peruvian varieties of Amaranthus caudatus have are known for their resistance to damping off and to root rot. Based upon phylogenecic studies (Lanoue et al., 1996) a number of wild species closely related to cultivated Amaranths should be explored for breeding purposes: Amaranthus floridanus and A. pumilus for salt tolerance, A. powellii and A. fimbriatus for drought resistance, and A. hybridus , A. quitensis, and A. retroflexus for pest, viral and bacterial resistance. Not only would these wild species be valuable for breeding with the cultivated Amaranths, but they would also be favourable target species to explore useful genes for other crop traits. Origin and use Amaranths have a long tradition in the New World, where they have been grown as pseudo- cereals by pre-Columbian civilizations on thousands of hectares. In Mesoamerica, amaranth developed as an important ritual and cash crop. They were grown as the principal grain crop by the Aztecs 5,000 to 7,000 years ago, until to the disruption of their culture(s) by the Spanish Conquistadors. The reasons of this decline is still unclear, since the Aztecs relied on the amaranths as an important staple.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate
    Weed Science Interaction of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate www.cambridge.org/wsc dioxygenase (HPPD) and atrazine alternative photosystem II (PS II) inhibitors for control of multiple herbicide–resistant waterhemp Research Article (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in corn Cite this article: Willemse C, Soltani N, David CH, Jhala AJ, Robinson DE, Sikkema PH 1 2 3 4 (2021) Interaction of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate Christian Willemse , Nader Soltani , C. Hooker David , Amit J. Jhala , dioxygenase (HPPD) and atrazine alternative 5 5 photosystem II (PS II) inhibitors for control of Darren E. Robinson and Peter H. Sikkema multiple herbicide–resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in corn. Weed Sci. 1Graduate Student, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada; 2Adjunct Professor, 69:492–503. doi: 10.1017/wsc.2021.34 Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada; 3Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada; 4Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Received: 15 December 2020 Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA and 5Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, Revised: 16 March 2021 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada Accepted: 14 April 2021 First published online: 20 April 2021 Abstract Associate Editor: Dean Riechers, University of Illinois The complementary activity of 4-hydroxphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitors and atrazine is well documented, but the use of atrazine is restricted in some geographic areas, Keywords:
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus Palmeri S. Wats.) in the United States — Mechanisms of Resistance, Impact, and Management
    Chapter 1 Herbicide-Resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in the United States — Mechanisms of Resistance, Impact, and Management Parminder S. Chahal, Jatinder S. Aulakh, M. Jugulam and Amit J. Jhala Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61512 Abstract Palmer amaranth, a dioecious summer annual species, is one of the most trouble‐ some weeds in the agronomic crop production systems in the United States. In the last two decades, continuous reliance on herbicide(s) with the same mode of action as the sole weed management strategy has resulted in the evolution of herbicide- resistant (HR) weeds, including Palmer amaranth. By 2015, Palmer amaranth bio‐ types had been confirmed resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibitors, dinitroanilines, glyphosate, hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibi‐ tors, and triazine herbicides in some parts of the United States along with multiple HR biotypes. Mechanisms of herbicide-resistance in Palmer amaranth are discussed in this chapter. Preplant herbicide options including glufosinate, 2,4-D, and dicam‐ ba provide excellent Palmer amaranth control; however, their application is limited before planting crops, which is often not possible due to unfavorable weather con‐ ditions. Agricultural biotechnology companies are developing new multiple HR crops that will allow the post-emergence application of respective herbicides for management of HR weeds, including Palmer amaranth. For the effective in-crop management of Palmer amaranth, and to reduce the potential for the evolution of other HR weeds, growers should apply herbicides with different modes of action in tank-mixture and should also incorporate cultural practices including inversion till‐ age and cover crops along with herbicide programs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Management of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus Palmeri S
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 The biology and management of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats) in Indiana Douglas J. Spaunhorst Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Spaunhorst, Douglas J., "The biology and management of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats) in Indiana" (2016). Open Access Dissertations. 1003. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1003 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. i THE BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF PALMER AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS PALMERI S. WATS) IN INDIANA A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Douglas J. Spaunhorst In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy i December 2016 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ProQuest Number:10245028 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10245028 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Amaranthus Palmeri
    International Research Journal of Biological Sciences ________________ _______ ___________ E-ISSN 2278-3202 Vol. 5(5), 35-43, May (201 6) Int. Res. J. Biological Sci. Antioxidant Activities of Phytonutrient of Amaranthus Palmeri Rajeshwari A. 1* , Thammanna Gowda S.S. 2 and Somashekar G.N .3 1Department of Biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagar, Ma ndya District, Karnataka. India 2Central Research Lab., Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences., B.G. Nagar, Mandya District, Karnataka. India. B.G. N agar, Mandya District, Karnataka. India 3Department of Biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagar, Mandya Di strict, Karnataka. India [email protected] Available online at: www.isca.in , www.isca.me Received 31 st March 2016, revised 04 th April 2016, accepted 10 th May 201 6 Abstract Amaranthus is commonly consumed green leafy vegetable in India. It is bushy perennial herb available throughout the year in India. Animal experiments and human studies have shown that, it is an effective hypoglycemic and hypocholesterolaemic agent. Amaranthus leaves rich in carbohydrates, proteins and vitamin A, vit K and vit C. It also contains minerals such as iron, magnesium, calcium and phosphorous. It reduces bad cholesterol and anemia. In the current study, we evaluated the water, methanol, and chloroform and h exane extract of Amaranthus in-terms of their antioxidant activity in -vitro models. Ours studies proved that, compared to all the other extracts, methanol and water extracts showed more activity. Among these two extracts, water extract possess highest anti oxidant activity in all the model systems. Lipid peroxidation activity of the was 75 and 66% in both linoleic and RBC membrane model system.
    [Show full text]
  • Amaranthus Palmeri
    EPPO Datasheet: Amaranthus palmeri Last updated: 2021-02-02 IDENTITY Preferred name: Amaranthus palmeri Authority: Watson Taxonomic position: Plantae: Magnoliophyta: Angiospermae: Basal core eudicots: Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae: Amaranthoideae Common names: Palmer amaranth (US), careless weed (US), dioecious amaranth view more common names online... EPPO Categorization: A2 list, Alert list (formerly) view more categorizations online... EPPO Code: AMAPA more photos... GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION History of introduction and spread In North America, A. palmeri has been historically reported as native to the Sonoran Desert (covering a large part of Southwestern United States and Northwest Mexico) (Sauer, 1955; Mosyakin & Robertson, 1997). In recent decades, it has expanded its range to occupy many states across the USA but is most common and problematic in the southern tier states (Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina). The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2018) details that the species is considered to be present but highlights the ‘significant uncertainty’ regarding the current status. It is unknown if populations of A. palmeri currently occur in Ontario in areas where it was previously reported. Additionally, both Mosyakin & Robertson (1997) and USDA (2019) report the species as present in Australia but it remains uncertain if the species does occur in Australia. A. palmeri was first observed in the EPPO region (e.g. in Sweden) in the early 1900s and is now recorded as established in a few EPPO countries and transient in several others. In some countries, occurrences have increased in recent years. For example, in Spain, A. palmeri was first found in 2007 dispersed among crop fields (maize) and adjacent field margins.
    [Show full text]