Temp Tt 66 Stroud 4 Jan 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National -
Sodomy, the Courts and the Civic Idiom in Eighteenth-Century Bristol
Urban History, 34, 1 (2007) C 2007 Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom doi:10.1017/S0963926807004385 ‘Bringing great shame upon this city’: sodomy, the courts and the civic idiom in eighteenth-century Bristol STEVE POOLE∗ School of History, University of the West of England, Bristol, St Matthias Campus, Bristol BS16 2JP abstract: During the 1730s, Bristol acquired an unenviable reputation as a city in which sodomy was endemic and rarely punished by the civil power. Although the cause lay partly in difficulties experienced in securing convictions, the resolve of magistrates was exposed to fierce scrutiny.Taking an effusive curate’s moral vindication of the city as a starting point, this article examines the social production of sodomy in eighteenth-century Bristol, analyses prosecution patterns and considers the importance of collective moral reputation in the forging of civic history. The Saints Backsiding In 1756, Emanuel Collins, curate, schoolmaster and doggerel poet, penned an extraordinary moral vindication of the city of Bristol, following the public disclosure of a pederasty scandal in the Baptist College and the flight of a number of suspects. In a rare flash of wit, he entitled it, The Saints Backsiding. Not for the first time, it appeared, Collins’ home city was being whispered about elsewhere as a place in which sodomitical transgression was both endemic and unpunished. ‘I am not unacquainted with the many foul reflections that have been cast on my Fellow-Citizens of BRISTOL concerning this most abominable vice’, Collins began, but ‘tis the fate of all cities to be the conflux of bad men.’ They go there ‘to hide themselves in the multitude and to seek security in the crowd’. -
Stroud District Local Plan Review Draft Local Plan Consultation
Stroud District Local Plan Review: Draft Local Plan Consultation The Berkeley Estate Stroud District Local Plan Review Draft Local Plan Consultation Representations prepared by Savills on behalf of ‘The Trustees of the Berkeley Settlement’ (The Berkeley Estate) savills.co.uk January 2020 1 Stroud District Local Plan Review: Draft Local Plan Consultation Introduction 1. These representations have been prepared by Savills on behalf of The Berkeley Estate (TBE) in response to the consultation on the Draft Stroud District Local Plan (Draft LP) which ends on 22 January 2020. 2. The Berkeley family, who remain integral to TBE, has been associated with Berkeley since the 12th Century. The family’s long term commitment to the area, its community and the rural economy means that the use/development of its land is important to its legacy. For the same reason, TBE also engages with the development of the wider District, and takes an active interest in the Development Plan process. 3. TBE land interest is focused in the south western part of the District, extending to approximately 6,000 acres in Gloucestershire’s Berkeley Vale. It includes a mediaeval Deer Park, a number of farms let to farming tenants (where the families have often been on the land for generations), cottages, offices, a hotel and two pubs. TBE also owns the New Grounds at Slimbridge, where the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust is based, and about five miles of the bed of the River Severn. It is a vibrant business providing employment and business opportunities. 4. Specific comments within these representations are made in respect of the proposed allocations relating to the ‘land at Focus School, Wanswell’, ‘Sharpness Garden Village’ and ‘Wisloe Garden Village’. -
Uk Capacity Reserve Limited Bristol Road, Gloucester, Gl2 5Ya
UK CAPACITY RESERVE LIMITED BRISTOL ROAD, GLOUCESTER, GL2 5YA Property Investment Secure RPI income Energy Power Plant INVESTMENT SUMMARY Opportunity to acquire a well let electricity supply plant with RPI uplifts Freehold site extending to approximately 1.5 acres Let to UK Capacity Reserve Limited on an FRI lease from 12th May 2015 and expiring on 11th May 2040 with a tenant’s break clause on 31st December 2033 providing 13 years term certain. Topped up rent of £105,000 pa with upward only RPI uplifts every 5 years. Good covenant strength Offers in excess of £1,450,000 (One Million Four Hundred and Fifty Thousand Pounds) subject to contract and exclusive of VAT which reflects a net initial yield of 6.83% after allowing for purchasers’ costs of 6.08% LOCATION The Cathedral City of Gloucester is the administrative centre of the county and lies approximately 104 miles west of London, 55 miles south of Birmingham, 34 miles north of Bristol and 8 miles south west of Cheltenham. Gloucester has good road communications from the A40/A38 with direct access to the M5 at Junction 11, 11a and 12. The M5 provides a continuous motorway link to the M4, M50, M6 and M42. The city has excellent rail services, with the minimum journey time to London Paddington 1 hour 45 minutes. SITUATION The property is positioned off the Bristol Road to the south of Gloucester Town Centre in an established commercial area including car dealerships, trade counter units, self storage, retail warehousing and petrol filling stations PROPERTY COVENANT STRENGTH Freehold site extending to approximately 1.5 acres and let UK Capacity Reserve Limited is a leading provider of flexible to UK Capacity Reserve Limited and utilized as an power capacity to the UK electricity market. -
Recovery Service Leaflet South Glos
Advocacy Contact If you feel that you are struggling to get your South Gloucestershire Recovery Service point of view across, you may wish to consider North Team having someone to act as an advocate. The Elms, 26 Gloucester Road, Thornbury, Bristol, BS35 1DG You can find out more about this from Tel: 01454 271000 Care Forum South Team 0117 956 9331 Kingswood Civic Centre High street, Kingswood https://www.thecareforum.org/advocacy/ South Bristol, BS15 9TR Local Information Tel: 0117 378 4611/4621 9am - 5pm Gloucestershire (For medical emergencies dial 999) Your care co-ordinator is: Recovery Service PALS To make a comment, raise a concern or make a complaint, please contact the Trust’s Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) Tel: 01225 362 900 Other people involved in your care are: Freephone: 0800 073 1778 Information for service users and carers Email: [email protected] Other languages and formats If you need this information in another language or format (such as large print, audio, Braille), please call the PALS number. Lead: South Glos Recovery Team Manager Leaflet code: AWP 022E Last reviewed: March 2021 Next review due: March 2023 What is the recovery service? Together, we will regularly review your care Where possible, they will involve family, friends plan and what support you require. and carers in the care plan, making sure We provide care, treatment and support for everyone knows who to contact in an people who have been referred for further help Some people need higher levels of support at emergency. after assessment from the primary care liaison times or struggle with seeking help. -
Stroud Labour Party
Gloucestershire County Council single member ward review Response from Stroud Constituency Labour Party Introduction On 30 November the Local Government Boundary Commission started its second period of consultation for a pattern of divisions for Gloucestershire. Between 30 November and 21 February the Commission is inviting comments on the division boundaries for GCC. Following the completion of its initial consultation, the Commission has proposed that the number of county councillors should be reduced from 63 to 53. The districts have provided the estimated numbers for the electorate in their areas in 2016; the total number for the county is 490,674 so that the average electorate per councillor would be 9258 (cf. 7431 in 2010). The main purpose of this note is to draw attention to the constraints imposed on proposals for a new pattern of divisions in Stroud district, which could lead to anomalies, particularly in ‘bolting together’ dissimilar district wards and parishes in order to meet purely numerical constraints. In it own words ‘the Commission aims to recommend a pattern of divisions that achieves good electoral equality, reflects community identities and interests and provides for effective and convenient local government. It will also seek to use strong, easily-identifiable boundaries. ‘Proposals should demonstrate how any pattern of divisions aids the provision of effective and convenient local government and why any deterioration in equality of representation or community identity should be accepted. Representations that are supported by evidence and argument will carry more weight with the Commission than those which merely assert a point of view.’ While a new pattern of ten county council divisions is suggested in this note, it is not regarded as definitive but does contain ways of avoiding some possible major anomalies. -
Census Briefing for Commissioners
Census Briefing for Commissioners Louise Li Strategic Needs Analysis Performance and Need Gloucestershire County Council October 2013 Contact: [email protected] 01452 328555 Census Briefing for Commissioners CONTENT Summary Page 3-8 Purpose of the Paper 9 The Census 2011 9 The Population 9-11 The Environment 12-14 The Communities 15-18 Children, Young People and Families 19-21 Working in Gloucestershire 22-24 Health and Care 25-27 ******************************************************* Appendices (Maps) Page 28-29 Appendix 1: Population Density in Gloucestershire Appendix 2: Proportion of Households with Access to a Car Appendix 3: Number of Households Deprived in 3 or More Dimensions Appendix 4: Proportion of Out-of-Work Households with Dependent Children 2 Census Briefing for Commissioners SUMMARY The Population (page 9-11) With a population of 596,984, Gloucestershire was the second most populated county in the region in 2011. There were an additional 1,100 non-UK short-term residents who were not counted as usual residents on the Census day. The population growth rate between 2001 and 2011 at 5.7%, or an annual growth of 3,200 people, was lower than the national average of 7.8%. A third of the growth was attributable to Gloucester where demographic demand for services and infrastructure would have surged during the period. The current population consisted of 136,600 children and young people aged 0- 19, 349,000 adults aged 20-64, and 111,400 older people aged 65 or above. This included an increase in the working age and the older population, and a small reduction in the number of children and young people in the previous 10 years. -
Local Resident Submissions to the Gloucester City Council Electoral Review
Local resident submissions to the Gloucester City Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents with surnames A-H. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Gloucester District Personal Details: Name: Theresa Allen E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: As a resident of , Quedgeley I wish to protest about being moved to Kingsway Ward. We are an established part of Quedgeley, Gloucester. completely inappropriate. Putting the parts of the exsiting Quedgeley into Kingsway would mean that we wouldn't be represented correctly, the needs of Old Quedgeley are completely different to the new and up and coming Kingsway. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4957 03/03/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Gloucester District Personal Details: Name: Mr Argent E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 2: Use Lobleys Drive as boundary 1: Use Abbeymead Avenue as boundary Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Use Abbeymead Avenue as boundary Annotation 2: Use Lobleys Drive as boundary Comment text: . We are well served by local services, the majority of which are located in Hucclecote, for example Hucclecote library, the playing fields (King George V Playing Fields), the community centre, dentist, doctors, shops, banks etc. Most of the primary school aged children in our street go to Dinglewell School, which is also in Hucclecote. With this in mind, it makes sense for the voters within our street to have the democratic right to have their say on these vital services that they actually use daily. -
Journal Issue 3, May 2013
Stonehouse History Group Journal Issue 3 May 2013 ISSN 2050-0858 Published by Stonehouse History Group www.stonehousehistorygroup.org.uk [email protected] May 2013 ©Stonehouse History Group Front cover sketch “The Spa Inn c.1930” ©Darrell Webb. We have made every effort to obtain permission from the copyright owners to reproduce their photographs in this journal. Modern photographs are copyright Stonehouse History Group unless otherwise stated. No copies may be made of any photographs in this issue without the permission of Stonehouse History Group (SHG). Editorial Team Vicki Walker - Co-ordinating editor Jim Dickson - Production editor Shirley Dicker Janet Hudson John Peters Darrell Webb Why not become a member of our group? We aim to promote interest in the local history of Stonehouse. We research and store information about all aspects of the town’s history and have a large collection of photographs old and new. We make this available to the public via our website and through our regular meetings. We provide a programme of talks and events on a wide range of historical topics. We hold meetings on the second Wednesday of each month, usually in the Town Hall at 7:30pm. £1 members; £2 visitors; annual membership £5 2 Stonehouse History Group Journal Issue 3, May 2013 Contents Obituary of Les Pugh 4 Welcome to our third issue 5 Oldends: what’s in an ‘s’? by Janet Hudson 6 Spa Inn, Oldends Lane by Janet Hudson, Vicki Walker and Shirley Dicker 12 Oldends Hall by Janet Hudson 14 Stonehouse place names by Darrell Webb 20 Charles -
Local Insight Profile for 'Berkeley CP' Area Gloucestershire Parish Profiles
1 Local Insight profile for ‘Berkeley CP’ area Gloucestershire Parish Profiles Report created 9 November 2016 Finding your way around this Local Insight profile 2 Introduction Page 3 for an introduction to this report 25% of people have no qualifications in Berkeley CP compared There are 1,880 people living in Berkeley CP with 22% across England See pages 4-9 for more information on population by age and gender, ethnicity, country See pages 35-37 for more information on qualifications, pupil attainment and early years of birth, language, migration, household composition and religion Population Education & skills educational progress 7% of children are living in poverty in Berkeley CP compared 46% people aged 16-74 are in full-time employment in Berkeley with 19% across England CP compared with 39% across England See pages 10-21 for more information on children in poverty, people out of work, people See pages 38-42 for more information on people’s jobs, job opportunities, income and local Vulnerable groups in deprived areas, disability, pensioners and other vulnerable groups Economy businesses 2% of households lack central heating in Berkeley CP compared with 3% across England 17% of households have no car in Berkeley CP compared with 26% across England See pages 22-28 for more information on housing characteristics: dwelling types, Access & transport Housing housing tenure, affordability, overcrowding, age of dwelling and communal See pages 43-45 for more information on transport, distances services and digital services establishments -
Pittville Park
Pittville Park Green Flag Award and Green Heritage Site Management Plan 2016 – 2026 Reviewed January 2020 1 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 General information about the park .......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Legal Issues ................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Strategic Significance of Pittville Park ........................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Surveys and Assessments undertaken ........................................................................................................ 13 2.4 Community Involvement ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.5 Current management structure .................................................................................................................. 15 3.0 Historical Development............................................................................................................................ 18 3.1 The heritage importance of the park .......................................................................................................... 18 3.2 History of the park - timeline ..................................................................................................................... -
The Fleece Medical Society
Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal January/April 1983 The Fleece Medical Society H. J. Eastes, M.B., B.S., F.R.C.G.P. General Practitioner, Marshfield The Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Society was formed in 1874 and 9 years later a hundred years ago its journal first appeared. However, some 84 years ear- lier, on 21st May 1788, five members of our pro- fession all school friends or fellow students met in the parlour of the Fleece Inn at Rodborough, in the valley between Stroud and Nailsworth and resolved to set up the Gloucestershire Medical Society, better known as the Fleece Medical Society. The Fleece Inn, built in 1753, was patronised by members of the woollen trade which flourished in the valley. In 1853 the licence seems to have been transferred to a building nearer Stroud and known as the Old Fleece Inn. The original building in which Jenner and his friends met is now a private residence Hillgrove House on the A46 (Figure 1). Two of the five members founding the Fleece Medical Society, Edward Jenner of Berkeley and John Hickes of Gloucester, were already members of the Convivio-Medical Society meeting at the Ship Inn at Alveston near Bristol, a largely social club whose members were threatening to expel Jenner for his insistence on the importance of Coxpox as a protection against Smallpox. This may have been the spur that brought these five friends together to form what was, I believe, the oldest provincial medical society of which records still exist. The minutes are preserved, thanks to Sir William Osier The original Fleece Inn who bought them from Dr.