sustainability Article Who Benefits? How Interest-Convergence Shapes Benefit-Sharing and Indigenous Rights to Sustainable Livelihoods in Russia Maria S. Tysiachniouk 1,2,3,*, Laura A. Henry 4 , Svetlana A. Tulaeva 5 and Leah S. Horowitz 1,6 1 Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA;
[email protected] 2 The Centre for Independent Social Research, 190041 Saint Petersburg, Russia 3 Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, 6706KN Wageningen, The Netherlands 4 Department of Government and Legal Studies, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA;
[email protected] 5 North-West Institute of Management, Faculty of International Relations and Politics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 197101 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
[email protected] 6 School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA * Correspondence:
[email protected] Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 23 October 2020; Published: 30 October 2020 Abstract: The paper examines interactions of oil companies and reindeer herders in the tundra of the Russian Arctic. We focus on governance arrangements that have an impact on the sustainability of oil production and reindeer herding. We analyze a shift in benefit-sharing arrangements between oil companies and Indigenous Nenets reindeer herders in Nenets Autonomous Okrug (NAO), Russia, as an evolution of the herders’ rights, defined as the intertwined co-production of legal processes, ideologies, and power relations. Semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document analysis demonstrate that in NAO, benefit-sharing shifted from paternalism (dependent on herders’ negotiation skills) to company-centered social responsibility (formalized compensation rules). This shift was enabled by the adoption of a formal methodology for calculating income lost due to extractive projects and facilitated by the regional government’s efforts to develop reindeer-herding.