DOCSLIB.ORG

Canons of the Diocese of Chicago 2020, Updated 11.26.19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canons of the Diocese of Chicago 2020, Updated 11.26.19 2020 Edition THE CONSTITUTION AND CANONS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF CHICAGO Through the 182nd Annual Convention, 2019 Summary of Canonical Actions: Convention 2019 ........................................... p. 1 Table of Contents of the Constitution and Canons ............................................ p. 2 THE CONSTITUTION ..................................................................................... p. 5 THE CANONS ................................................................................................ p. 14 Rules of Order of Convention ......................................................................... p. 60 Historical Notes from Past Diocesan Conventions ......................................... p. 62 Province V – Constitution and Ordinances, Standing Rules and Bylaws ....... p. 66 The Rt. Rev. Jeffrey D. Lee Bishop of Chicago Michael W. Peregrine, Esq., Chancellor Paul Keller, Esq., Assistant Chancellor Richard J. Hoskins, Esq., Chancellor Emeritus Todd M. Young, Esq., Chancellor Emeritus Summary of Canonical Actions at the 182nd Annual Convention, 2019 The 182nd Annual Convention of the Diocese of Chicago met on Friday and Saturday, November 22 and 23, 2019, in Lombard, Illinois. Convention approved (on the second reading) a resolution to amend Article XVI of the Constitution, The Election of a Bishop. Convention also approved amendments to Canons 12 (Dissolution of the Pastoral Connection) and 14 (Differences Arising Between a Rector and the Vestry or Parish) to bring them into alignment with the canons of The Episcopal Church. Convention also approved amendments to Canon 33 (Commission on Ministry) and Canon 35B (Episcopal Charities). The business session of the Convention also included consideration and approval of resolutions on becoming a sanctuary diocese, freedom of speech and the right to boycott, minimum clergy compensation, opposition to capital punishment, common sense gun legislation, advocating for clean water in Ghana, and prevention of human trafficking of children in Chicago and Ghana. Todd M. Young, Chancellor Emeritus 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 THE TITLE AND BOUNDS OF THE DIOCESE ................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 2 ACCESSION TO CONSTITUTION AND GENERAL CONVENTION OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH ......................................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 3 THE ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY ................................................................................ 5 ARTICLE 4 ANNUAL AND SPECIAL CONVENTIONS ......................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 5 MEMBERS OF THE CONVENTION ..................................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 6 THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONVENTION .......................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 7 THE SECRETARY OF THE CONVENTION ........................................................................ 7 ARTICLE 8 THE TREASURER OF THE DIOCESE ................................................................................. 7 ARTICLE 9 THE HISTORIOGRAPHER OF THE DIOCESE ................................................................... 8 ARTICLE 10 THE STANDING COMMITTEE .......................................................................................... 8 ARTICLE 11 THE DEPUTIES TO THE GENERAL CONVENTION ....................................................... 9 ARTICLE 12 THE MODE OF ELECTION OF OFFICERS ....................................................................... 9 ARTICLE 13 THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS ................................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 14 THE ADMISSION OF NEW PARISHES ........................................................................... 10 ARTICLE 15 THE FORFEITURE OF PRIVILEGES ............................................................................... 10 ARTICLE 16 THE ELECTION OF A BISHOP ......................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE 17 THE DATE OF THE FISCAL YEAR ................................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 18 ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 19 ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMENTS ............................................................................ 11 ARTICLE 20 REPEAL ............................................................................................................................... 11 2 2020 canons updated 11.26.19 v.1 THE CANONS Title I: THE CONVENTION CANON 1 THE CLERICAL MEMBERS .................................................................................................. 12 CANON 2 THE LAY DELEGATES .......................................................................................................... 12 CANON 3 THE OFFICERS OF THE CONVENTION ............................................................................. 14 CANON 4 THE BUSINESS OF THE CONVENTION ............................................................................. 15 CANON 5 RULES OF ORDER FOR CONVENTION .............................................................................. 17 CANON 6 DEFINITION OF TITLES OF THE CLERGY ........................................................................ 17 CANON 7 QUALIFICATION FOR PASTORAL CHARGE OR MINISTRATION ................................ 18 CANON 8 THE ELECTION OR APPOINTMENT OF CLERGY ............................................................ 18 CANON 9 THE AUTHORITY OF RECTORS, PRIESTS-IN-CHARGE, AND DEACONS-IN- CHARGE .............................................................................................................................. 19 CANON 10 INSTRUCTION OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS ................................................................. 19 CANON 11 OFFICIATING WITHIN OTHER PAROCHIAL CURES .................................................... 20 CANON 12 DISSOLUTION OF THE PASTORAL CONNECTION ....................................................... 20 CANON 13 VACANCY IN RECTORATE ............................................................................................... 21 CANON 14 DIFFERENCES ARISING BETWEEN A RECTOR AND THE VESTRY OR PARISH ................................................................................................................................ 22 CANON 15 REGISTERS AND REPORTS ............................................................................................... 22 CANON 16 ALMS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE HOLY COMMUNION ..................................... 23 CANON 17 THE MISSION ........................................................................................................................ 23 CANON 18 THE PARISH AND ITS ORGANIZATION .......................................................................... 25 CANON 19 THE WARDENS .................................................................................................................... 27 CANON 20 THE CORPORATION AND VESTRY .................................................................................. 28 CANON 21 OFFICERS OF THE VESTRY ............................................................................................... 30 CANON 22 PARISH MEETINGS AND ELECTIONS ............................................................................. 30 CANON 23 THE CHURCH BUILDING ................................................................................................... 32 CANON 24 THE SALE OR ENCUMBRANCE OF REAL ESTATE ....................................................... 33 CANON 25 PARISHES WITH A VACANCY IN RECTORATE ............................................................ 33 CANON 26 PAROCHIAL BOUNDARIES ............................................................................................... 33 CANON 27 ACTS OF CONVENTION BINDING .................................................................................... 34 CANON 28 DISTRESSED PARISHES ..................................................................................................... 34 CANON 29 EPISCOPAL VISITATIONS .................................................................................................. 37 2020 canons updated 11.26.19 v.1 3 CANON 30 DEANS AND DEANERIES ................................................................................................... 37 CANON 31 THE DIOCESAN COUNCIL ................................................................................................. 38 TH CANON 32 CANON DELETED BY THE 180 CONVENTION ........................................................... 39 CANON 33 THE COMMISSION ON MINISTRY .................................................................................... 39 CANON 34 THE CATHEDRAL ................................................................................................................ 40 CANON 35 THE BISHOP AND TRUSTEES ............................................................................................ 41 CANON 35 A THE DIOCESAN FOUNDATION ..................................................................................... 43 CANON 35 B EPISCOPAL CHARITIES .................................................................................................. 45 CANON 36 THE CHANCELLOR ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History
    Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Updated February 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45087 Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Summary Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or “sense of” one or both houses of Congress. Censure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions’ sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly “censorious” resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. Resolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process “sense of” legislation. Since 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). The clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment of Clergy Office Holders a Guide To
    Appointment of clergy office holders A guide to good practice Produced in support of the Ecclesiastical Offices (Terms of Service) Measure 2009 Prepared by TSIP in 2013 for final approval by the Standing Committee of the House of Bishops and updated by RACSC in February 2015 Foreword 1. The process by which people are chosen for particular roles is one of the most important and sensitive in all institutions. The Church of England has, for many years, invested significantly in well resourced and nationally agreed arrangements for discerning the vocation of those called to ordained ministry. But, for a variety of reasons the Church of England has traditionally found it much more difficult to reflect nationally on the processes which come later, once someone is due to be considered for a parochial clergy appointment. 2. There have been a number of reasons for this reticence. The most obvious is the sheer fragmentation of responsibility for making appointments in a church with some 13,000 parishes. The Church of England is not a legal entity and is made up of many different bodies; in many ways it has more the qualities of an organism than an organization. 3. In addition, the patronage system, though much reformed over the years, has continued to make the practical operation of parochial appointments within the Church of England more complex than in many other institutions. In the appointment of incumbents, it remains the patron who has the right of initiative, though an appointment cannot proceed without the consent both of the bishop and of the two parochial representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Rector / Vicar / Priest-In-Charge | Receiving Names Until 07/15/21
    2IÀFHIRU 7UDQVLWLRQ 0LQLVWU\ Ministry Portfolio Full Portfolio (last updated Jun 1, 2021) St. Paul's Episcopal Church, North Carolina 218 S Second Street, Smithfield, NC 27577, United States Contact: Rector / Vicar / Priest-in-Charge | Receiving Names until 07/15/21. Weekly Average Sunday Number of Weekend Number of Weekday Number of Other per Month Attendance (ASA) Worship Services Worship Services Worship Services 93 2 Current Annual Cash Stipend Housing / Rectory Detail Utilities Compensation $76178 SECA reimbursement Compensation Available for Housing Available for Pension Plan New Position We're in compliance with $77000 CPF requirements. Healthcare Options Dental Housing Equity Allowance in Annual Equity Amount budget Negotiable Yes Vacation Weeks Vacation Weeks Details Continuing Education Weeks Continuing Education Weeks Details One month, including 5 2 (standard) Sundays (standard) Continuing Education Sabbatical Provision Travel/Auto Account Other Professional Account Funding in budget Yes Yes Yes $1001-$2000/year cash figure=cash compensation/housing allowance & SECA 2IÀFHIRU Full Portfolio 7UDQVLWLRQ (last updated Jun 1, 2021) 0LQLVWU\ Ministry Portfolio St. Paul's Episcopal Church, North Carolina Contact: Rector / Vicar / Priest-in-Charge | Receiving Names until 07/15/21. VUHFHQWPLQLVWU\ZKLFK\RXUHFRJQL]HDVRQHRIVXFFHVVDQGIXOܾOOPHQWف\HVFULEHDPRPHQWLQ\RXUZRUVKLSSLQJFRPPXQLW' St. Paul’s is an ordinary parish with special people doing special things. When the pandemic lockdown was announced, St. Paul’s was closed just one Sunday
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Christianity?-Johnson
    January 26, 1939 5c a copy THE WITNESS D’ASCENZO WINDOW In St. Paul’s, Chestnut Hill WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY?-JOHNSON Copyright 2020. Archives of the Episcopal Church / DFMS. Permission required for reuse and publication. SCHOOLS CLERGY NOTES SCHOOLS BAYNE, STEPHEN F. JR., formerly rector of Trinity, St. Louis, Mo., has accepted the W ft (Hetteral tE^eoIogical rectorship of St. John’s, Northampton, Mass., effective February 15th. Address: KHMEEEHZLL J^emmarg 64 Harrison Avenue. f COLE, STUART G., rector of Trinity, Sene­ KENOSHA, WISCONSIN Three-year undergraduate ca Falls, N. Y., is now acting chaplain of course of prescribed and elective Hobart College pending the appointment of Episcopal Boarding and Day School. study. a permanent chaplain. Preparatory to all colleges. Unusual GARDNER, H. G-, has resigned as rector of opportunities in Art and Musie. Fourth-year course for gradu­ St. Paul’s, Burlingame, Calif., because of Complete sports program. Junior ate», offering larger opportunity illness. School. Accredited. Address: for specialization. GESNER, A. T., retired, farmer professor at the Berkeley Divinity School, died at his SISTERS OF ST. MARY Provision for more advanced home in New Milford, Connecticut, on wwt, leading to degrees of S.T.M. January 14th. He was 73 years of age. Box W. T. and D.Th. HANNAH, RICHARD S., retired, died at his Kemper Hall Kenosha, Wisconsin home in Detroit on January x7th after a brief illness. He was 76 years of age. ADDRESS CATHEDRAL CHOIR SCHOOL HODGKIN, W. R. H., formerly archdeacon of California, has been appointed temporarily New York City THE DEAN in charge of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Censure of Board Members Policy Code: 2118
    Censure of Board Members Policy Code: 2118 It is the policy of the Board of Education that all Board members conduct themselves in a professional manner and in accordance with the Code of Ethics adopted by the Board. A "censure" under this policy is the process by which the Board of Education, acting by a two-thirds majority vote (i.e. five affirmative votes), can reprimand or condemn the actions of a member for any violation of law or policy or any other conduct committed by a Board member which tends to injure the good name of the Buncombe County Board of Education and/or undermines the effectiveness of the Buncombe County Schools or the Board of Education. A censure is an expression of formal disapproval by the Board. The Board, in addition to or in lieu of censure, may vote to 1) ask the member to resign or 2) refer possible misconduct by a Board member to the District Attorney as provided by law and/or 3) issue the Board member an official warning regarding future conduct. The Board of Education does not have the legal authority to remove a Board member from office. Therefore, any legal consequences or punitive sanctions related to a Board member’s actions shall be in accordance with applicable law and shall be separate and distinct from any censure proceeding under this Policy. In the event that a member of the Board of Education believes that a fellow Board member should be formally censured by the Board, the following protocol shall apply: 1) All Board proceedings related to a censure motion, with the exception of the disclosure of confidential information as permitted by the Open Meetings Law, shall be conducted in an open meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Call to Censure the President
    S. HRG. 109–524 AN EXAMINATION OF THE CALL TO CENSURE THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 31, 2006 Serial No. J–109–66 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 28–341 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Christ Church Rector Search Profile
    Christ Church Rector Search Profile Letter to Prospective Rector Candidates Christ Church Search Prayer Dear God, giver of every good gift: Look graciously on your whole church and our parish. Help us, we pray, as we search both for a new rector and for your proper direction of our life together. Open our minds to your guidance through prayer, peacefulness, and through listening attentively to the people of the parish, in love. Prepare us to receive a faithful pastor who will care for all your people and equip us to serve you in the parish, in our families, in the community and beyond, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen Dear Sister/ Brother in Christ, Thank you for your interest in Christ Church, Manlius. We hope our parish profile and website give you the information you need to begin to know our parish. Christ Church is known as a welcoming, caring, generous community where we strive to be open and respectful to all who come into our church. We love music and creative liturgy. We are looking for a new rector who can both nurture this welcoming and open community and who will challenge us to continue to seek out new ways to show God’s love in our ministries. Our Mission statement reads: “Transforming ourselves and our community through the unconditional love of Jesus Christ”. Our congregation has similar challenges in today’s world, and we seek a rector who finds these as opportunities for growing both within our congregation and outside to our greater community. Page 2 of 22 Table of Contents Who We Are Spiritual Life and Faith Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Fontmell Magna Extract from Hutchins History of Dorset
    From "The History and Antiquities of the County of Dorset" by John Hutchins, M.A., Volume III The Third Edition, Corrected, Augmented, and Improved, by William Shipp and James Whitworth Hodson. pages 556 to 561. 1868. In the Hundred of Sixpenny Handley. Transcribed by Chris Bellers Great Fontmel, Fontmel Magna, is a large parish, containing 2,853 a. The village is in the third year of her promotion, granted to Richard de situated a mile and a half north from Ewerne Minster. Manneston, custody of lands in Fontmel, during the In the Domesday Book, the church of St. Mary of minority of Roger, son of Richard Fouk. 5 Edw. II. Sceptesberie held Fontmale. “The church itself holds 1310, Alice, abbess of Shaftesbury, granted to Fontmale. In King Edward’s time it was taxed for Christian, once wife of Roger Fouk, the custody of his fifteen hides. There is land to sixteen ploughs. Of this land in Preston, Bedeshurst, and la Marshe, and the there are three hides and one virgate of land in the custody and maritage of the four daughters and heirs of demesne, and therein two ploughs; and three servi, and the said Roger. 20 Edw. III. the abbess held here, and forty-five villeins, and twenty bordars, with fourteen in Iwern and Melbury, three parts of a knight’s fee. ploughs. Three mills pay eleven shillings and seven At the dissolution this manor was granted to the pence, and there are eight acres of meadow and four Arundels, afterwards barons of Wardour. Sir Thomas quarentens of pasture, and eight quarentens, and two Arundel, knt.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Summorum Pontificum in the Diocese of Davenport
    DIOCESE OF DAVENPORT Policies for Implementing Summorum Pontificum in the Diocese of Davenport These pages may be reproduced by parish and Diocesan staff for their use Policy promulgated at the Pastoral Center of the Diocese of Davenport–effective September 14, 2007 Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross Revised November 27, 2011 Revised October 15, 2012 Most Reverend Martin Amos Bishop of Davenport TABLE OF CONTENTS §IV-249 POLICIES FOR IMPLEMENTING SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM IN THE DIOCESE OF DAVENPORT: INTRODUCTION 1 §IV-249.1 THE ROLE OF THE BISHOP 2 §IV-249.2 FACULTIES 3 §IV-249.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CELEBRATION OF MASS 4 §IV-249.4 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE OTHER SACRAMENTS AND RITES 6 §IV-249.5 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 6 APPENDICES Appendix A: Documentation Form 7 Appendix B: Resources 8 0 §IV-249 Policies for Implementing Summorum Pontificum in the Diocese of Davenport §IV-249 POLICIES IMPLEMENTING SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM IN THE DIOCESE OF DAVENPORT Introduction In the 1980s, Pope John Paul II established a way to allow priests with special permission to celebrate Mass and the other sacraments using the rites that were in use before Vatican II (the 1962 Missal, also called the Missal of John XXIII or the Tridentine Mass). Effective September 14, 2007, Pope Benedict XVI loosened the restrictions on the use of the 1962 Missal, such that the special permission of the bishop is no longer required. This action was taken because, as universal shepherd, His Holiness has a heart for the unity of the Church, and sees the option of allowing a more generous use of the Mass of 1962 as a way to foster that unity and heal any breaches that may have occurred after Vatican II.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 1, No 8 Bishop Alden John Bell
    + BISHOP ALDEN JOHN BELL Priest of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles 1932 - 1956 Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles 1956 -1962 Sixth Bishop of the Diocese of Sacramento 1962 -1979 1904 - 1982 SACRAMENTO DIOCESAN ARCHIVES Vol 1 July 2012 No 9 Fr John E Boll, Diocesan Archivist Alden John Bell was born in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada on July 11, 1904, son of Henry and Catherine (Galvin) Bell. He received his earliest education at Orillia, Ontario. Following a brief time in Ohio, the family moved to Southern California in 1918 where Alden enrolled in Sacred Heart School in Los Angeles. After his father’s death, young Alden sold newspapers at the foot of Angels Flight, the funicular railway in Los Angeles, to help support his mother and six brothers. ALDEN’S EARLY DAYS IN LOS ANGELES Alden worked for four years as an office boy for the Pacific Telephone Company and at night took classes at the Polytechnic High School in commercial drawing and mechanics. In 1922, he entered the seminary to study for the priesthood for the Diocese of Monterey-Los Angeles. He attended St Joseph Seminary in Mountain View and St Patrick Seminary, Menlo Park and was ordained a priest by Bishop John J Cantwell on May 14, 1932 for the Diocese of Los Angeles – San Diego. FATHER BELL BEGINS HIS MINISTRY Father Bell’s first assignment was as a curate at St Elizabeth Parish in Altadena. He was then transferred to the Cathedral Chapel Parish in Los Angeles to serve as a curate. In 1937, the diocese sent him to the Catholic University of America for graduate studies where he earned a Master of Science degree in social work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communists and the Bulgarian . Orthodox
    . The Communists and the Bulgarian .Orthodox Church, 1944-48: The Rise and Fall of Exarch Stefan SPAS T.RAIKIN For a long time before the communist takeover in Bulgaria on 9 Sep­ tember 1944, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church and the Communist Party had been in a state of open hostility. The Bulgarian communists held firmly to the Marxist view that religion is the opium ofthe people. They carried on agitation at every level to discredit religion and the Church-. Intellectuals were told that to hold any religious beliefs is to regress to superstition. For the peasants and working classes, the priest was reduced to an object of ridicule for his laziness and immorality, illustrated with many degrading stories. This campaign, waged largely by young men who had. received some education in provincial towns, was conducted primarily in village taverns and on street corners where peasant youth congregated in the absence of any other social outlets, and was highly successful. To this challenge the Church could not find an adequate response. The mutually exclusive philosophical positions of Church and communism deprived both Church and Party of any point of contact. They remained total strangers, completely opposed to each other. The Communist Party never tried to infiltrate the Church or to create its own following there. Unlike the Orthodox Church in Yugoslavia, where numerous priests found themselves in the partisan groups of Marshal Tito, the Bulgarian Church was conspicuously absent from the "Fatherland Front" organised by the communists as a front to take over the country in 1944. The Church was part of the political and social order in the country, and was dependent upon this order for its survival.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Sanctuary of Our Sorrowful Mother EXECUTIVE
    The National Sanctuary of Our Sorrowful Mother Portland, Oregon USA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Job Description, Core Requirements, and Application Instructions GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Executive Director is hired by and responsible to The National Sanctuary of Our Sorrowful Mother (The Grotto) Board of Directors. The Executive Director, a Roman Catholic, will have overall responsibility for the management of The Grotto. The Executive Director will collaborate with the Rector, who provides the Catholic leadership consistent with the directives of the Catholic Church and the Order of Friar Servants of Mary. The Executive Director will be responsible for the day-to-day administration of the Corporation, working closely with the Chair of the Board of Directors to ensure that all corporate functions are aligned with the Bylaws of The National Sanctuary of Our Sorrowful Mother, an Oregon corporation. The Executive Director will collaborate with the shrine Rector in support of ministerial and spiritual functions. With support from The Grotto managers and other staff members, the Executive Director will work to enhance the philosophy and mission of the shrine. The Grotto managers reporting directly to the Executive Director are Business/Finance, Development, Marketing and Communications, Creative Services, Grounds and Facilities, Gift Shop, and Conference Center. The Executive Director is responsible for the operational success and financial viability of The Grotto, including sound fiscal growth and management of the Corporation. The establishment of annual long- and short-term financial objectives will be the responsibility of the Executive Director, who will oversee the annual operating budget and endowments. In collaboration with the Board of Directors, the Executive Director will provide the vision and leadership for long-term fiscal growth and development, and enhancement of The Grotto as a Catholic shrine and botanical garden.
    [Show full text]