DOCSLIB.ORG

The Annual Report on the Progress in the National Youth Strategy Implementation 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Annual Report on the Progress in the National Youth Strategy Implementation � 2009 REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF YOUTH AND SPORT THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE PROGRESS IN THE NATIONAL YOUTH STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION - 2009 - Belgrade, May 2010 The Report was made with the technical assistance of the German organization for technical cooperation (GTZ )under the scope of the project “Strengthening of structures for youth empowerment and participation”. 1. INTRODUCTION In a wide consultative process and through participation of all stakeholders, above all young people, the National Youth Strategy (hereinafter referred to as “NYS“) was made and adopted by the Serbian Government on 9 May 2008 on Europe Day. While finishing the NYS, the work on the action plan for its implementation was initiated. The Аction plan for the implementation of the National Youth Strategy for the period from 2009 to 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “APNYS“) was adopted by the Government on 22 January 2009. Fifteen ministries, a large number of the young, state bodies, organizations and institutions, associations, local self-governments, and experts in various fields took place in the process of drafting APNYS. APNYS defined the activities and protagonists in every sector under the scope of NYS, as well as the deadlines for the implementation and priority activities in 2009, the first year of implementation. Based on APNYS, all ministries, organizations and institutions, and protagonists in certain activities of the implementation made a plan of the implementation of the activities and included them in their annual plans for the year 2009. Following the agreed cooperation on the APNYS implementation, the Ministry of Youth and Sports (hereinafter referred to as “MYS“) prepared a special method of collecting the information on the implementation of the activities planned for the year 2009, concordant with the suggested APNYS monitoring and evaluation method. Based on the collected information, the Annual report on the progress of the National Youth Strategy implementation was made .1 2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH The Report on the progress of the NYS implementation was prepared based on several sources of information harmonized with the defined APNYS monitoring and evaluation system. There are two groups of sources used in making the report: а) responses of the protagonists in activities and projects in the special questionnaire for monitoring the APNYS implementation in 2009. The questionnaire consisted of three segments – the correspondence of the implemented activity/project to a general goal and specific objective of the NYS, the survey of elements and effects of the immediate implementation and the proposal of the planned activities for the year 2010. The example of the questionnaire is enclosed in Annex 1, whereas the list of all protagonists who sent their reports is enclosed in Annex 2; b) reports and research on certain aspects of the youth policy or about the attitudes of the young made or conducted for MOS by other bodies, organizations, and institutions. The questionnaire prepared by MYS especially for the monitoring of implementation is structured to enable collection of all relevant information and indicators of the implemented activities and projects. In addition to the informative part, the questionnaire provided the direct evaluation of: • the degree of implementation of planned activities and projects; 1 The Report on APNYS implementation was made jointly by MYS and GTZ project “Strengthening of the Structures for Youth Empowerment and Participation”. 2 • degree of implemented results in relation to the results projected in APNYS; • restrictions in the implementation, if any; • lessons learned from the mere process of implementation of activities and projects; • degree of sustainability of implemented activities and projects, i.e. long-term effects on the young and their life in community. MYS sent the questionnaire to all protagonists in the APNYS activities planned for 2009. Responses were sent back by 22 ministries, state bodies, organizations and institutions, 77 towns and municipalities – self-government units (SGU), 67 of which have opened the local youth offices (LYO) and 54 associations whose projects were financed by MYS in 2008 and 2009, and implemented in 2009. Additionally, MYS sent the questionnaires to the international organizations which provided support to the APNYS activities and projects. Responses and reports were sent by six international organizations. The report is structured based on the general goals and specific objectives of the NYS, activities planned in APNYS, and the questionnaire prepared for collecting the information. The obtained information were analyzed in comparison to the activities planned in APNYS and the defined monitoring system for the APNYS implementation. Comparison and analysis of the data were impeded in the half-filled questionnaires, and the questionnaires with unclear answers. Another difficulty arose in the questionnaires where not all three segments were fulfilled so that no true picture of the implementation could be obtained. Also, the problem in processing of the collected data was the indicated number of participants. As most of the ministries did not state the number of participants in the activities and projects, the information of the number of participants obtained from the answers of other protagonists could be taken only as an approximate benchmark and cannot be considered final and precise, but can be taken as an approximate indicator of the number of participants in certain activities and projects. In the first part of the Report, general indicators of APNYS implementation in the first year of implementation are shown, comprising the following: • structure of protagonists of APNYS implementation; • structure of activities; • participants in the APNYS implementation; • primary results of the implemented activities and projects; • implemented partnerships and cooperation among protagonists; • lessons learned from the implementation of activities and projects; • restrictions which arose in the course of implementation. In the second part of the Report, a detailed analysis of all eleven general goals of the NYS is shown, which enables a precise insight into implementation of activities and projects under the scope of each goal and its specific objectives. Some general goals are analyzed and presented in charts and figures, whereas the others are described in writing, depending on the diversification of the implemented activities (under some general goals only one activity with the specific objective was implemented, which couldn’t be presented in a chart or figure). 3 PART ONE 4 1. The implementation directions 1.1 Protagonists in the implementation and their roles Implementation of activities defined in the APNYS was realized in a few ways: o through initiating and direct implementation of the planned activities most often by ministries, state bodies and organizations, either independently or jointly in partnership, following the responsibilities defined in APNYS; o through general or topical tenders for the activities defined by the APNYS general goal(s) for associations, the young, organizations, and institutions. The tenders were announced by the ministries, SGU, and other organizations. As the key protagonist in the APNYS implementation, МYS carried out the defined responsibilities – а) independently and/or b) together with other state bodies, organizations, institutions and ministries. а) МYS independently implemented activities defined in the APNYS in several metheds and forms: o as independent, autonomous activities which APNYS defines for the particular year and which are funded directly by MYS; o as tenders for asociations which will implement the APNYS activities in their projects and MYS provides the financial funds, while the associations implement the projects; o as the announcements of the Serbian Fund for Young Talents, the indirect beneficiary of the budget funds through the distribution of the Ministry of Youth and Sports funds; o as the activities implemented by MYS to support the youth offices and local self- governments. b) МYS together with other ministries, international organizations, associations and organizations implemented the activities and projects outlined in the APNYS. These activities were planned and initiated by other ministries state bodies, organizations and institutions based on their programmes and budget plans, and MYS was a cooperant, partner or co- implementor. 1.2 Structure of the implemented activities based on the NYS general goals The analysis of the number of implemented activities / projects can be taken as a benchmark for the analysis of APNYS implementation and it provides a response to one of the APNYS indicators. Based on the information obtained from the questionnaires in 2009, 1.069 activities and projects within APNYS were implemented. The structure of the implemented activities based on the NYS general goals is the following: 5 Number of General goal activities and projects General goal 1 To encourage the young to participate actively in society 19 3 General goal 2 To develop cooperation with the young and provide conditions for their 77 participation in decision-making through a sustainable institutional framework, based on the needs of the young and in partnership with the young General goal 3 To build a system of informing the young on all levels and in all fields 66 General goal 4 To secure exercising of the right to equal opportunities of all th e young 69 in society, particularly of the young living in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • O Naknadama Za Korišćenje Javnih Dobara
    ZAKON O NAKNADAMA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 95/2018) I UVODNE ODREDBE Predmet uređivanja Član 1 Ovim zakonom uređuju se naknade za korišćenje javnih dobara, i to: obveznik plaćanja, osnovica, visina, način utvrđivanja i plaćanja, pripadnost prihoda od naknade, kao i druga pitanja od značaja za utvrđivanje i plaćanje naknada za korišćenje javnih dobara. Definicije Član 2 Pojedini izrazi upotrebljeni u ovom zakonu imaju sledeće značenje: 1) naknada je javni prihod koji se naplaćuje za korišćenje određenog javnog dobra; 2) javno dobro je prirodno bogatstvo, odnosno dobro od opšteg interesa i dobro u opštoj upotrebi (u daljem tekstu: javno dobro); 3) korišćenje javnog dobra, u smislu ovog zakona, podrazumeva neposredno korišćenje javnog dobra na osnovu zakona ili ugovora ili vršenje neposrednog uticaja na raspoloživost, kvalitet ili neku drugu osobinu javnog dobra činjenjem ili nečinjenjem; 4) obveznik plaćanja naknade za korišćenje javnog dobra je pravno lice, preduzetnik ili fizičko lice (u daljem tekstu: obveznik naknade) koje koristi javno dobro; 5) osnovica za utvrđivanje naknade za korišćenje javnog dobra (u daljem tekstu: osnovica) je jedinica mere, vrednost dobra koje se koristi ili prihod koji se ostvaruje; 6) visina naknade je novčani iznos za korišćenje javnog dobra (u daljem tekstu: visina naknade). Uvođenje naknada Član 3 Naknade za korišćenje javnih dobara mogu se uvoditi samo ovim zakonom. II VRSTE NAKNADA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA Vrste naknada Član 4 Ovim zakonom uvode se naknade za korišćenje javnih
    [Show full text]
  • Strategija Održivog Razvoja Opštine Topola Akcioni Plan 2012 – 2016
    Strategija održivog razvoja opštine Topola Akcioni plan 2012 – 2016 1 Strategija održivog razvoja Opštine Topola: Akcioni plan 2012 - 2016 Opština: Topola Adresa, telefon, fax, email: Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra I, broj 9, 34310 Topola http://www.topola.com/ Naziv strateškog dokumenta: Strategija održivog razvoja opštine Topola Naziv dokumenta: Akcioni plan 2012 – 2016 Verzija: 5.0 Datum: 28.02.2012 Učesnici u procesu izrade: Dragan Jovanović, predsednik opštine Koordinator za izradu Akcionog Zora Nedović plana: Koordinacioni tim: Gavrilo Nikolić, Danica Dragićević, Rajka Mitrović, Bratislav Nikolić, Miroljub Marković, Dr.Goran Djordjević, Ljiljana Todorović, Sladjana Mitrović, Tanja Mićić, Slobodanka Milivojević, Goran Mirković, Marko Jokić, Dušica Ilić Nedić, Dragan Stojanović i Dubravka Nikolić Tehnička podrška MSP IPA 2007: Milan Marjanović, Slavka Zupan Ovaj dokument napravljen je uz finansijsku pomoć Evropske unije. Sadržaj ovog dokumenta isključiva je odgovornost opštine i ni na jedan način ne predstavlja stavova Evropske unije. 2 Strategija održivog razvoja Opštine Topola: Akcioni plan 2012 - 2016 SADRŽAJ I. OPŠTI PODACI O OPŠTINI TOPOLA .......................................................................................................... 5 II. PREGLED POSTOJEĆE STRATEGIJE ........................................................................................................... 7 III. IZVEŠTAJ O IMPLEMENTACIJI STRATEGIJE OD 2010. DO 2011. GODINE ................................................. 12 IV. AKCIONI PLAN OD 2012. GODINE
    [Show full text]
  • Na Osnovu Člana 191. Zakona O Vodama („Službeni Glasnik RS”, Br
    Na osnovu člana 191. Zakona o vodama („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 30/10, 93/12 i 101/16) i člana 42. stav 1. Zakona o Vladi („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 55/05, 71/05 – ispravka, 101/07, 65/08, 16/11, 68/12 – US, 72/12, 7/14 – US i 44/14), Vlada donosi UREDBU o visini naknada za vode "Službeni glasnik RS", broj 14 od 23. februara 2018. 1 . Uvodna odredba Član 1. Ovom uredbom utvrđuje se visina naknade za korišćenje voda, naknade za ispuštenu vodu, naknade za odvodnjavanje, naknade za korišćenje vodnih objekata i sistema i naknade za izvađeni rečni nanos, u skladu sa kriterijumima utvrđenim Zakonom o vodama. 2 . Naknada za korišćenje voda Član 2. Naknada za korišćenje voda utvrđuje se u visini, i to za: 1 ) sirovu vodu koja se koristi za pogonske namene 0,2762 dinara po 1 m ³ vode; 2 ) vodu kvaliteta za piće koja se koristi za svoje potrebe 0,3782 dinara po 1 m ³ vode; 3 ) vodu koja se koristi za navodnjavanje: (1 ) ako postoji uređaj za merenje količine isporučene vode 0,1132 dinara po 1 m ³ vode, (2 ) ako ne postoji uređaj za merenje količine isporučene vode 679,1678 dinara po hektaru; 4 ) vodu koja se koristi za uzgoj riba u: (1 ) hladnovodnim ribnjacima , ako postoji uređaj za merenje količine isporučene vode,0,0227 dinara po m ³ vode, a ako ne postoji mogućnost merenja količine isporučene vode prema projektovanom kapacitetu zahvaćene vode na vodozahvatu, (2 ) toplovodnim ribnjacima 5.659,7321 dinar po hektaru ribnjaka, (3 ) ribnjacima za sportski ribolov 2.829,8661 dinar po hektaru ribnjaka; 5 ) vodu za piće koja se sistemom javnog vodovoda
    [Show full text]
  • Spisak Gradova U Republici Srbiji
    Redni broj Naseljeno mesto Katastarska opština 123 1. Valjevo Babina Luka Babina Luka Balinoviæ Balinoviæ Baèevci Baèevci Beliæ Beliæ Beloševac Beloševac Beomueviæ Beomueviæ Blizonje Blizonje Bobova Bobova Bogatiæ Bogatiæ Brangoviæ Brangoviæ Brankovina Brankovina Brezovica Brezovica Bujaèiæ Bujaèiæ Valjevo Valjevo Veselinovac Veselinovac Vlašèiæ Vlašèiæ Vragoèanica Vragoèanica Vujinovaèa Vujinovaèa Gola Glava Gola Glava Gornja Bukovica Gornja Bukovica Gornja Grabovica Grabovica Grabovica Gornje Leskovice Gornje Leskovice Deguriæ Deguriæ Divci Divci Divèibare Divèibare Donja Bukovica Donja Bukovica Donje Leskovice Donje Leskovice Draèiæ Draèiæ Dupljaj Dupljaj abari abari Zabrdica Zabrdica Zarube Zarube Zlatariæ Zlatariæ Jovanja Jasenica Jasenica Joševa Joševa Kamenica Kamenica Klanica Klanica Klinci Klinci Kovaèice Kovaèice Kozlièiæ Kozlièiæ Jazovik Kotešica Kotešica Kunice Kunice Leliæ Leliæ Redni broj Naseljeno mesto Katastarska opština 123 Loznica Loznica Lukavac Lukavac Majinoviæ Majinoviæ Milièinica Milièinica Mrèiæ Mrèiæ Oglaðenovac Oglaðenovac Osladiæ Osladiæ Paklje Paklje Paune Paune Petnica Petnica Popuèke Popuèke Goriæ Prijezdiæ Prijezdiæ Prièeviæ Prièeviæ Rabas Rabas Ravnje Ravnje Raðevo Selo Raðevo Selo Rebelj Rebelj Mijaèi Rovni Rovni Sandalj Sandalj Sedlari Sedlari Sitarice Sitarice Sovaè Sovaè Stanina Reka Stanina Reka Stapar Stapar Strmna Gora Strmna Gora Stubo Stubo Suvodanje Suvodanje Sušica Sušica Taor Taor Tubraviæ Tubraviæ Tupanci Tupanci 2. Vranje Aleksandrovac Aleksandrovac Babina Poljana Babina Poljana Barbarušnice
    [Show full text]
  • O Naknadama Za Korišćenje Javnih Dobara
    ZAKON O NAKNADAMA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 95/2018) I UVODNE ODREDBE Predmet uređivanja Član 1 Ovim zakonom uređuju se naknade za korišćenje javnih dobara, i to: obveznik plaćanja, osnovica, visina, način utvrđivanja i plaćanja, pripadnost prihoda od naknade, kao i druga pitanja od značaja za utvrđivanje i plaćanje naknada za korišćenje javnih dobara. Definicije Član 2 Pojedini izrazi upotrebljeni u ovom zakonu imaju sledeće značenje: 1) naknada je javni prihod koji se naplaćuje za korišćenje određenog javnog dobra; 2) javno dobro je prirodno bogatstvo, odnosno dobro od opšteg interesa i dobro u opštoj upotrebi (u daljem tekstu: javno dobro); 3) korišćenje javnog dobra, u smislu ovog zakona, podrazumeva neposredno korišćenje javnog dobra na osnovu zakona ili ugovora ili vršenje neposrednog uticaja na raspoloživost, kvalitet ili neku drugu osobinu javnog dobra činjenjem ili nečinjenjem; 4) obveznik plaćanja naknade za korišćenje javnog dobra je pravno lice, preduzetnik ili fizičko lice (u daljem tekstu: obveznik naknade) koje koristi javno dobro; 5) osnovica za utvrđivanje naknade za korišćenje javnog dobra (u daljem tekstu: osnovica) je jedinica mere, vrednost dobra koje se koristi ili prihod koji se ostvaruje; 6) visina naknade je novčani iznos za korišćenje javnog dobra (u daljem tekstu: visina naknade). Uvođenje naknada Član 3 Naknade za korišćenje javnih dobara mogu se uvoditi samo ovim zakonom. II VRSTE NAKNADA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA Vrste naknada Član 4 Ovim zakonom uvode se naknade za korišćenje javnih
    [Show full text]
  • Žrtve Rata 1941-1945 ALEKSANDROVAC
    Sadržaj Žrtve rata 1941-1945 ALEKSANDROVAC........................................................... 1 Draževac........................................................................... 11 Aleksandrovac................................................................... 1 Glogovica.......................................................................... 11 Bobote............................................................................... 1 Golešnica.......................................................................... 11 Boturići.............................................................................. 1 Gornja Peščanica.............................................................. 11 Bratići................................................................................ 1 Gornje Suhotno................................................................. 11 Bzenica............................................................................. 1 Gornji Adrovac................................................................... 12 Dašnica............................................................................. 1 Gornji Krupac.................................................................... 12 Dobroljupci........................................................................ 1 Gornji Ljubeš..................................................................... 12 Donja Zleginja................................................................... 1 Gredetin...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Region Opština Mesto Broj Goveda (Živih) BEOGRAD BARAJEVO
    Region Opština Mesto Broj goveda (živih) BEOGRAD BARAJEVO ARNAJEVO 307 BACEVAC 101 BARAJEVO 281 BELJINA 268 BOŽDAREVAC 226 GUNCATI 133 LISOVIĆ 111 MANIC 71 MELJAK 48 ROŽANCI 301 VELIKI BORAK 282 VRANIĆ 267 ŠILJAKOVAC 36 BEOGRAD-SURČIN BEČMEN 36 BOLJEVCI 111 DOBANOVCI 507 JAKOVO 193 PETROVČIĆ 257 PROGAR 79 SURČIN 51 GROCKA BEGALJICA 40 BOLEČ 5 BRESTOVIK 4 DRAŽANJ 128 GROCKA 4 KALUĐERICA 11 KAMENDOL 28 LEŠTANE 1 PUDARCI 87 UMČARI 488 VRCIN 88 ZAKLOPACA 5 ŽIVKOVAC 7 LAZAREVAC ARAPOVAC 89 BAROŠEVAC 34 BARZILOVICA 102 BISTRICA 150 BRAJKOVAC 184 BUROVO 12 CVETOVAC 64 DREN 128 DUDOVICA 247 JUNKOVAC 46 KRUŠEVICA 34 LAZAREVAC 20 LESKOVAC 146 LUKAVICA 54 MALI CRLJENI 35 MEDOŠEVAC 9 MIROSALJCI 236 PETKA 46 PRKOSAVA 7 Region Opština Mesto Broj goveda (živih) BEOGRAD LAZAREVAC RUDOVCI 26 SOKOLOVO 94 STEPOJEVAC 107 STRMOVO 52 STUBICA 33 TRBUŠNICA 286 VELIKI CRLJENI 165 VRBOVNO 114 VREOCI 26 ZEOKE 11 ČIBUTKOVICA 100 ŠOPIĆ 91 ŠUŠNJAR 39 ŽUPANJAC 35 MLADENOVAC AMERIC 183 BELJEVAC 91 CRKVINE 108 DUBONA 62 GRANICE 26 JAGNJILO 914 KORAĆICA 555 KOVAČEVAC 595 MALA VRBICA 46 MARKOVAC 161 MEĐULUŽJE 336 MLADENOVAC (SELO) 109 MLADENOVAC (VAROŠ) 128 PRUŽATOVAC 482 RABROVAC 1,109 RAJKOVAC 93 SENAJA 8 VELIKA IVANČA 960 VELIKA KRSNA 918 VLAŠKA 350 ŠEPŠIN 77 NOVI BEOGRAD NOVI BEOGRAD 22 OBRENOVAC BALJEVAC 117 BARIČ 28 BELO POLJE 64 BROVIĆ 354 DRAŽEVAC 434 DREN 389 GRABOVAC 1,109 JASENAK 316 KONATICE 93 KRTINSKA 915 LJUBINIC 436 MALA MOŠTANICA 38 MISLODIN 135 OBRENOVAC 19 ORAŠAC 573 PIROMAN 292 Region Opština Mesto Broj goveda (živih) BEOGRAD OBRENOVAC POLJANE 220 RATARI
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Data of Sumadija and Pomoravlje
    SSOOCCIIOO--EECCOONNOOMMIICC DDAATTAA OOFF SSUUMMAADDIIJJAA AANNDD PPOOMMOORRAAVVLLJJEE The basic geographic and historical data Geography and topography Region of Sumadija and Pomoravlje is located in the central part of the Republic of Serbia, in between big rivers the Sava and the Danube in the north, the Great Morava in the east, the Western Morava in the west. Sumadija and Pomoravlje consist of following areas: Temnic, Levac, Gruza, Belica, Lepenica, Jasenica, Takovo, Kacer, Kosmaj, Belgrade and Smederevo Danube Region. The total area of the region is 5001km2, which makes 5.6% of the total area of the Republic of Serbia. On this territory, according to the last official census, conducted 2011th live 507 844 people, and the average population density of 101 inhabitants per km2. Proportion of population Sumadije and Pomoravlje in the total population of the Republic of Serbia is 7%. Region of Sumadija and Pomoravlje consists of two districts: Sumadija and Pomoravlje. Sumadija District includes the City of Kragujevac and six municipalities: Arandjelovac, Batocina, Lapovo, Knic, Raca and Topola. Total area of Sumadija District is 2.387 km2, of which 835 km2 covers the City of Kragujevac that is also the largest settlement in the Region. Population of Sumadija District is 298.778 inhabitants with average density of 125 Inhabitants/km2. Pomoravlje district make the city Jagodina and five municipalities Despotovac Paracin, Rekovac, Svilajnac and Ćuprija. With a total area of 2617km2 and 214536 inhabitants, Pomoravlje district has an average population density of 82 inhabitants per km2. The City of Kragujevac is the largest Viewing area of municipalities of Sumadia and city in the territory of Sumadije and Pomoravlje region ( km2) Pomoravlje, and reresent the 900 835 800 administrative, economic, cultural, 700 623 542 educational and health center of the 600 470 413 500 376 356 366 entire region Sumadije and Pomoravlje 400 326 287 300 216 and central Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Opština Mesto Broj Vakcinacija BEOGRAD BARAJEVO
    Region Opština Mesto Broj vakcinacija BEOGRAD BARAJEVO ARNAJEVO 277 BACEVAC 20 BARAJEVO 10 BELJINA 267 BOŽDAREVAC 32 GUNCATI 79 MANIC 131 ROŽANCI 353 VELIKI BORAK 16 VRANIĆ 4 BEOGRAD-SURČIN BEČMEN 218 BOLJEVCI 5,082 DOBANOVCI 953 JAKOVO 2,132 PETROVČIĆ 462 PROGAR 1,200 SURČIN 1,234 GROCKA BEGALJICA 106 DRAŽANJ 221 KALUĐERICA 14 KAMENDOL 90 LEŠTANE 12 PUDARCI 175 RITOPEK 17 UMČARI 1,104 VRCIN 98 ŽIVKOVAC 2 LAZAREVAC ARAPOVAC 24 BAROŠEVAC 10 BARZILOVICA 34 BISTRICA 5 BRAJKOVAC 2 BUROVO 6 CVETOVAC 44 DREN 8 DUDOVICA 1,647 JUNKOVAC 100 KRUŠEVICA 8 LAZAREVAC 35 LESKOVAC 32 LUKAVICA 1 MIROSALJCI 126 PETKA 58 SOKOLOVO 129 STEPOJEVAC 172 STRMOVO 41 VELIKI CRLJENI 727 VRBOVNO 82 VREOCI 681 ZEOKE 11 ČIBUTKOVICA 215 ŠOPIĆ 24 Region Opština Mesto Broj vakcinacija BEOGRAD LAZAREVAC ŠUŠNJAR 6 ŽUPANJAC 19 MLADENOVAC AMERIC 76 BELJEVAC 87 CRKVINE 24 DUBONA 125 JAGNJILO 280 KORAĆICA 304 KOVAČEVAC 1,019 MALA VRBICA 91 MARKOVAC 266 MEĐULUŽJE 901 MLADENOVAC (SELO) 30 MLADENOVAC (VAROŠ) 34 PRUŽATOVAC 13 RABROVAC 169 RAJKOVAC 82 SENAJA 70 VELIKA IVANČA 620 VELIKA KRSNA 1,068 VLAŠKA 539 ŠEPŠIN 265 NOVI BEOGRAD NOVI BEOGRAD 80 OBRENOVAC BALJEVAC 144 BARIČ 51 BELO POLJE 129 BROVIĆ 463 DRAŽEVAC 823 DREN 288 GRABOVAC 2,901 JASENAK 5 KONATICE 859 KRTINSKA 516 LJUBINIC 1,999 MISLODIN 179 OBRENOVAC 3 ORAŠAC 716 PIROMAN 1,146 POLJANE 642 RATARI 25,450 RVATI 15 SKELA 754 STUBLINE 910 TRSTENICA 930 UROVCI 144 UŠCE 318 VELIKO POLJE 863 VUKICEVICA 407 ZABREŽJE 112 ZVECKA 428 PALILULA BORCA 43 OVCA 20 PADINSKA SKELA 37,308 Region Opština Mesto Broj vakcinacija BEOGRAD PALILULA
    [Show full text]
  • Development Potentials Index of Tradable Sectors in Serbia - DPI 2014
    ISBN 978-86-80420-05-9 Development Potentials Index of Tradable Sectors in Serbia - DPI 2014- Authors: Nemanja Šormaz Center for advanced economic studies Director Danijela Bobić Center for advanced economic studies Program director The Chamber of Commerce and IndustryCCIS of Serbia is independent, modern and responsible non-budget institution, the national association of all Serbian businesses which its tradition, experience, knowledge and expertise put in the best interest of its members and the economy of Serbia. To establish Serbia as a country recognizable by its in- vestment potential, market economy and open borders, a country prepared to be competitively integrated into the European mainstream, represents our fundamental interest. A century and a half long tradition of the chamber system of Serbia and widely spread chamber network and repre- sentative offices abroad are the guarantee for the effective application of all mechanisms of support to the economy and the business community. The Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia is responsible partner and support to business by representing the interests of members in front of the state authorities and institutions, carrying out the public powers by the issuance of various documents, developing economic cooperation with foreign countries, representation, protection and promotion of interests of Serbian business in the country and abroad, education service, independent proceedings of disputable cases with the Court of Honor and arbitration. Addition to numerous public powers (foreign trade activities, consensual financial restructuring, freight forwarding operations, certification services, solvency certificates) CCIS issues qualified electronic certificates which provide to entrepreneurs secure e-business with less cost, simple procedures and greater efficiency.
    [Show full text]