REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF YOUTH AND SPORT
THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE PROGRESS IN THE NATIONAL YOUTH STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION 2009
Belgrade, May 2010
The Report was made with the technical assistance of the German organization for technical cooperation (GTZ )under the scope of the project “Strengthening of structures for youth empowerment and participation”.
1. INTRODUCTION
In a wide consultative process and through participation of all stakeholders, above all young people, the National Youth Strategy (hereinafter referred to as “NYS“) was made and adopted by the Serbian Government on 9 May 2008 on Europe Day. While finishing the NYS, the work on the action plan for its implementation was initiated. The Аction plan for the implementation of the National Youth Strategy for the period from 2009 to 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “APNYS“) was adopted by the Government on 22 January 2009. Fifteen ministries, a large number of the young, state bodies, organizations and institutions, associations, local self governments, and experts in various fields took place in the process of drafting APNYS. APNYS defined the activities and protagonists in every sector under the scope of NYS, as well as the deadlines for the implementation and priority activities in 2009, the first year of implementation. Based on APNYS, all ministries, organizations and institutions, and protagonists in certain activities of the implementation made a plan of the implementation of the activities and included them in their annual plans for the year 2009. Following the agreed cooperation on the APNYS implementation, the Ministry of Youth and Sports (hereinafter referred to as “MYS“) prepared a special method of collecting the information on the implementation of the activities planned for the year 2009, concordant with the suggested APNYS monitoring and evaluation method. Based on the collected information, the Annual report on the progress of the National Youth Strategy implementation was made .1
2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
The Report on the progress of the NYS implementation was prepared based on several sources of information harmonized with the defined APNYS monitoring and evaluation system. There are two groups of sources used in making the report:
а) responses of the protagonists in activities and projects in the special questionnaire for monitoring the APNYS implementation in 2009. The questionnaire consisted of three segments – the correspondence of the implemented activity/project to a general goal and specific objective of the NYS, the survey of elements and effects of the immediate implementation and the proposal of the planned activities for the year 2010. The example of the questionnaire is enclosed in Annex 1, whereas the list of all protagonists who sent their reports is enclosed in Annex 2;
b) reports and research on certain aspects of the youth policy or about the attitudes of the young made or conducted for MOS by other bodies, organizations, and institutions.
The questionnaire prepared by MYS especially for the monitoring of implementation is structured to enable collection of all relevant information and indicators of the implemented activities and projects. In addition to the informative part, the questionnaire provided the direct evaluation of: • the degree of implementation of planned activities and projects;
1 The Report on APNYS implementation was made jointly by MYS and GTZ project “Strengthening of the Structures for Youth Empowerment and Participation”. 2 • degree of implemented results in relation to the results projected in APNYS; • restrictions in the implementation, if any; • lessons learned from the mere process of implementation of activities and projects; • degree of sustainability of implemented activities and projects, i.e. long term effects on the young and their life in community.
MYS sent the questionnaire to all protagonists in the APNYS activities planned for 2009. Responses were sent back by 22 ministries, state bodies, organizations and institutions, 77 towns and municipalities – self government units (SGU), 67 of which have opened the local youth offices (LYO) and 54 associations whose projects were financed by MYS in 2008 and 2009, and implemented in 2009.
Additionally, MYS sent the questionnaires to the international organizations which provided support to the APNYS activities and projects. Responses and reports were sent by six international organizations.
The report is structured based on the general goals and specific objectives of the NYS, activities planned in APNYS, and the questionnaire prepared for collecting the information. The obtained information were analyzed in comparison to the activities planned in APNYS and the defined monitoring system for the APNYS implementation.
Comparison and analysis of the data were impeded in the half filled questionnaires, and the questionnaires with unclear answers. Another difficulty arose in the questionnaires where not all three segments were fulfilled so that no true picture of the implementation could be obtained. Also, the problem in processing of the collected data was the indicated number of participants. As most of the ministries did not state the number of participants in the activities and projects, the information of the number of participants obtained from the answers of other protagonists could be taken only as an approximate benchmark and cannot be considered final and precise, but can be taken as an approximate indicator of the number of participants in certain activities and projects.
In the first part of the Report, general indicators of APNYS implementation in the first year of implementation are shown, comprising the following:
• structure of protagonists of APNYS implementation; • structure of activities; • participants in the APNYS implementation; • primary results of the implemented activities and projects; • implemented partnerships and cooperation among protagonists; • lessons learned from the implementation of activities and projects; • restrictions which arose in the course of implementation.
In the second part of the Report, a detailed analysis of all eleven general goals of the NYS is shown, which enables a precise insight into implementation of activities and projects under the scope of each goal and its specific objectives. Some general goals are analyzed and presented in charts and figures, whereas the others are described in writing, depending on the diversification of the implemented activities (under some general goals only one activity with the specific objective was implemented, which couldn’t be presented in a chart or figure).
3
PART ONE
4 1. The implementation directions
1.1 Protagonists in the implementation and their roles
Implementation of activities defined in the APNYS was realized in a few ways:
o through initiating and direct implementation of the planned activities most often by ministries, state bodies and organizations, either independently or jointly in partnership, following the responsibilities defined in APNYS; o through general or topical tenders for the activities defined by the APNYS general goal(s) for associations, the young, organizations, and institutions. The tenders were announced by the ministries, SGU, and other organizations.
As the key protagonist in the APNYS implementation, МYS carried out the defined responsibilities – а) independently and/or b) together with other state bodies, organizations, institutions and ministries.
а) МYS independently implemented activities defined in the APNYS in several metheds and forms: o as independent, autonomous activities which APNYS defines for the particular year and which are funded directly by MYS; o as tenders for asociations which will implement the APNYS activities in their projects and MYS provides the financial funds, while the associations implement the projects; o as the announcements of the Serbian Fund for Young Talents, the indirect beneficiary of the budget funds through the distribution of the Ministry of Youth and Sports funds; o as the activities implemented by MYS to support the youth offices and local self governments.
b) МYS together with other ministries, international organizations, associations and organizations implemented the activities and projects outlined in the APNYS. These activities were planned and initiated by other ministries state bodies, organizations and institutions based on their programmes and budget plans, and MYS was a cooperant, partner or co implementor.
1.2 Structure of the implemented activities based on the NYS general goals
The analysis of the number of implemented activities / projects can be taken as a benchmark for the analysis of APNYS implementation and it provides a response to one of the APNYS indicators. Based on the information obtained from the questionnaires in 2009, 1.069 activities and projects within APNYS were implemented. The structure of the implemented activities based on the NYS general goals is the following:
5
Number of General goal activities and projects General goal 1 To encourage the young to participate actively in society 19 3 General goal 2 To develop cooperation with the young and provide conditions for their 77 participation in decision making through a sustainable institutional framework, based on the needs of the young and in partnership with the young General goal 3 To build a system of informing the young on all levels and in all fields 66 General goal 4 To secure exercising of the right to equal opportunities of all th e young 69 in society, particularly of the young living in difficult circumstances General goal 5 To encourage and value exceptional performance and achievements of 61 the young in different fields General goal 6 To develop opportunities for quality free time of the young 189 General goal 7 To develop an open, efficient, effective and just system of formal and 91 informal education available to all the young people following the global education trends as well as the education context in the Republic of Serbia General goal 8 To encourage and stimulate all forms of employment , self employment 93 and entrepreneurship of the young General goal 9 To advance the conditions for the safe life of the young 92 General goal 10 To take care and advance the health of the young , reduce risks and 88 main health problems and develop a health care system adapted to the young General goal 11 To encourage the young for the initiatives and activities in line with the 50 main goals of the sustainable development аnd healthy environment TOTAL 1.069
Goal 10 Goal 11 8% 5% Goal 1 Goal1 18% Goal 2 Goal 2 7% Goal 3 Goal 9 9% Goal 3 Goal 4 6% Goal 8 Goal 5 9% Goal 6
Goal 7
Goal 4 Goal 8 6% Goal 5 Goal 9 6% Goal 10 Goal 7 8% Goal 6 17% Goal 11
Figure 1. Structure of the implemented activities and projects based on the NYS general goals
The structure of implemented activities and projects shows (Figure 1) that the largest number of activities and projects were implemented within the general goal 1 ( To encourage the young to participate actively in society ) and they make the total of 193, i.e. 18% of the total number of the implemented activities. The next is goal 6 ( To develop opportunitites for quality free time of the young ) with 189 activities and projects, i.e. 17%. General goals 7 ( To develop open, efficient, effective and just system of formal and informal education available to all the young people following the world education trends as well as the education context in the Republic of Serbia ), 8 ( To encourage and stimulate all forms of employments, self employment and entrepreneurship of the young ) and 9 ( To advance the conditions for the safe life of the young ) have a similar number of implemented activities (93, 91, 91), i.e. 9% of the
6 total number of activities and projects. Under the scope of general goal 10 ( To take care and advance the health of the young, reduce risks and main health problems and develop a health care system adapted to the young ), 88 activities and projects were implemented, i.e. 8% of the total number. Implementation of general goal 2 ( To develop cooperation with the young and provide conditions for their participation in decision making through sustainable institutional framework, based on the needs of the young and in partnership with the young ) included 77 activities and projects, i.e. 8%, while the implementation of goals 4 ( To secure exercising of the right to equal opportunities of all the young in society, particularly of the young living in difficult circumstances ), 3 ( To build a system of informing the young on all levels and in all fields ) and 5 ( To encourage and value exceptional performance and achievements of the young in different fields ) included a similar number of activities (68, 66 and 61), i.e. 6% each of the total number. Within the general goal 11 ( To encourage the young for the initiatives and activities in line with the main goals of the sustainable development аnd healthy environment ), 50 activities and projects were implemented, i.e. 5%. The data show that the young were mostly interested in the issues of their position and role in society, especially in their communities, and the issue of how to spend their free time. The protagonists of the implementation of the APNYS goals were ministries, state and public bodies and organizations, local self governments, local youth offices, associations.
1.3 Participants
One of the characteristics of the APNYS projects and activities implementation is an enormous number of participants. Some protagonists of APNYS implementation failed to state the number (at least approximate) of direct and indirect participants, so that it couldn’t be said what is the total number of participants. In the reports of some SGU, a general statement was provided that “most citizens participated in the implementation of activities”, or “most young people from the countryside...” participated in the activities, etc. This indicates that the precise number of direct and indirect participants is much larger than the number obtained in the data analysis. It can be said that more than 780,000 direct and more than 1,000,000 indirect participants took place in the APNYS implementation . Based on the obtained data, the largest number of participants were involved in the implementation of general goal 6 – 247,777 direct and 240,000 indirect users. In the implementation of general goal 1 there were around 40,000 direct and more than 50,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 2 there were 5,936 direct and more than 20,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 3 there were 82,766 direct and more than 200,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 4 there were 226,909 direct and 140,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 5 there were 63,515 direct and more than 10,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 7 there were 15,520 direct and around 20,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 8 there were 23,266 direct and 69,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 9 there were around 50,000 direct and more than 200,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 10 there were around 32,228 direct and more than 55,000 indirect participants; in the implementation of general goal 11 there were 8,047 direct and more than 20,000 indirect participants.
1.4 Results of activities
7
1.4.1 The key achieved results
Generally speaking, results of the implemented activities and projects show a great degree of achievement and harmonization with the expected results defined in APNYS.
The application of the defined indicators for specific objectives show that the degree of harmonization of the achieved and planned results for the year 2009 equals 70% (approximately) for all protagonists in the in the APNYS implementation .
МYS achieved 75% of harmonization between the planned and achieved results.
If the planned indicators of the number of activities are compared to the achieved number of activities, the largest degree of implementation was achieved within general goal 1 – both in total and based on the specific objectives.
The effects of the activities and projects implementation regarding general goals and specific objectives can be compared with the expected results outlined in APNYS. The application of the defined indicators shows that the first year of the APNYS implementation provided the following: o developed awareness of all social factors, especially decision makers on every level, about the needs of the young and the ways to satisfy their needs; o advanced communication among the young, as well as among the institutions responsible for the young; o increased responsibility and inclusion of the young in the life of the local community; o increased level of being informed about various issues significant for the young, their life and work; o connecting the young on the local level; o advanced quality of life in the community achieved through the initiatives of the young; o a developed level of participation, activism, responsibility and creativity of the young; o trainings for the young to become able to transfer their knowledge and experience to their peers; o empowerment of the young to form associations and undertake their own initiatives; o increased mobility of the young in the country and abroad; o increased sensitivity of the young to accept cultural diversity; o better being informed of the young.
These conclusions come out from the fact that the young and their organizations, supported by the local YO, associations and SGU, mostly dealt with their participation in life on the national, and particularly on the local level and that they recognized implementation of the APNYS activities as a mechanism which can help them to change their position and role in society. This is also proved by the fact that the young mostly took part in drafting the local action plans, defining the information needs of the young, establishing the youth councils, initiating different programmes to fulfill free time of the young, strengthening of the youth organizations and bodies in which the young can actively participate in their community and environment.
8 1.4.2 Promotion of active participation of the young in every aspect of social life
Pursuant to APNYS, goal 2.1.2. activity 4, Promotion of active participation and empowerment of the citizens in every aspect of social life and empowerment of actors for the participation process, in 2009 МYS opened eleven tenders providing support to initiatives and programmes motivating, educating and encouraging the young to actively participate in society. The total of 141 projects was approved and RSD 157,876,256.40 was allocated for their implementation. Eleven projects targeted at inclusion and independence of the young from the sensitive social groups implemented by associations are ongoing and financed by MYS through the Tender for inclusion of civil associations in the process of NYS implementation by implementation of the projects targeted at implementation of NYS goals and activities planned in APNYS. Also ongoing are nine projects implemented by associations and financed by MYS, based on the Tender for inclusion of citizens in the process of NYS implementation and activities planned in APNYS dealing with peer education on HIV/AIDS, addicition diseases, advancement of reproductive health of the young, prevention of self destructive behaviour of the young, information about and promotion of healthy lifestyle. MYS provided financial funds for 18 projects implemented by civil associations targeted at promotion of voluntary work of the young and social appraisal of the voluntary work and the young involved in it.
1.4.3 Normative regulation of the changed role of the young in society
On the national level, the activities carried out in the implementation of APNYS contributed or even ensured adoption or participation in adoption of certain legal and regulatory documents regulating key issues of the role of the young on all levels: o in 2009 MYS worked on the finalization of the Strategy for career guidance and counselling based on Action plan, which was adopted on March 4 2010 by the Serbian government, following the proposal of MYS; o decision to establish the working group for NYS implementation published in “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 71/09, 31 August 2009; o upon the initiative of MYS, Republic of Serbia officially signed the Partial agreement Centre “North South” on March 1 2009 (the Government decision adopted 21 January 2009); o National action plan for employment for the year 2009 and Action plan for the implementation of youth employment policy for the period 2009 2011; o A wide consultative process for the preparation of the Law on Youth was initiated. Working group for drafting the Law on Youth was established. Research about human and material resources of the organizations and institutions dealing with youth policies was conducted, as well as abouth the degree of their networking and achieved projects. A comparative legal analysis of relevant national legislature was carried out and proposals of the system solution for organizing youth policy were made; o The Law on employment and insurance in case of unemployment was adopted (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 36/09); o The Law on Professional Rehabilitation and Employment of Disabled Persons was adopted (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 36/09); o The Law on Associations was adopted (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 51/09); o Following the proposal of the Ministry of Interior Affairs, the Law on Changes and Amendments of the Law on Prevention of Violence and Inappropriate
9 Behaviour at the Sports Manifestation (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 72/09 and 111/09); o The National Strategy for Prevention and Protection of Children from Violence was adopted by the Serbian Government on 25 December 2008 (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 122/08 dated 30 December 2008), and Action Plan for the implementation of strategy was adopted on 11 March 2010 for the period from 2010 to 2012 (published in “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 19/10 dtaed 15 March 2010 ); o National action plan for the implementation of the Strategy for Combating human trafficking adopted by the Serbian Government on 30 April 2009 (Official Gazette of RS, no. 35/09); o The Law on the Safe Traffic on the Roads was adopted (Official Gazette of RS, no. 41/09 dated 2 June 2009) whose implementation started on 10 December 2009; o Draft of the law on public order was made and forwarded to the Ministry of Justice; o The draft of the law on public gatherings was completed; o The National programme for the health care of women, children and youth was adopted and published in Official Gazette of RS, no. 28/09, which prioritizes the health care of the young people not older than 26 years of age, regardless of their inclusion in the education system (i.e. higher education); o The draft of the law on volunteering was prepared, public debate was organized about the draft of the law and the draft was submitted to the ministries for an opinion. The proposal of the law on volunteering was adopted at the Government meeting held on 17 September 2009, and then submitted to the National Assembly for adoption. The Law was adopted and published in Official Gazette of RS, no. 36/10 dated 26 May 2010.
1.4.4 Promotion of the active role of the young in the life of local community
By the end of January 2010, 103 local youth offices were opened. In addition to the initiative to open LYO, MYS has actively strengthened their capacities to implement youth policy through organizing trainings for coordinators and providing support to the process of drafting local youth action plans. Over 50 local self government units established Youth Councils (half of whose members are the young). This body provides the opportunity for the young to directly participate in decision making on the local level for the issues relating to the young. Adoption of the local youth action plans, the making of which included a large number of the young people, created the conditions for the participation of the young in decision making. MYS together with GTZ and local self governments, under the scope of the project “Conflict Transformation and Youth Empowerment”, provided support for 32 local self governments to adopt local youth action plans (LAP) by the end of 2009. Together with OSCE, the project “Support to LAP in 9 municipalities“ has been implemented. Based on the tender opened by MYS last summer, 25 municipalities were allocated funds for drafting LAP. Only these three activities are expected to bring about 66 LAPs adopted by the local governments . In these activities the key protagonists on the local level were LYO and SGU, and support was provided by MYS, competent ministries and international organizations. In the process of initiating and implementing the APNYS activities on the local level, LYOs were given the role of initiator or “nucleus” of changes for the participation of the young in society. Effects of these activities can be seen not only in the degree of achievement of the expected
10 results, but also in a series of formal sustainable decisions which turn some activities into a system supporting the young. Statutes of the municipalities with LYO comprise articles defining the establishment of LYO, youth councils, budget allocated for the activities of LYO. Some municipalities regulated in their statutes other important matters regarding the young people in the local community, e.g. volunteering, volunteer services, different forms of peer education, harmonization of the support system (together with MLSP) for the young coming from the sensitive groups in order to include them lawfully in the community life. One of the effects is paying special attention to the young talents, not only on the national level, but also on the local level. Besides the Serbian Fund for the Young Talents, many municipalities established funds intended for the young talents (Krupanj, Krusevac, Lajkovac, Negotin, Novi Sad, Pirot, Plandiste, Pozega, Zajecar, Ivanjica, Kikinda, etc). The Fund for Youth Employment was established within the project “Support to national efforts to promote employment of the young and migration management”. In order to promote systematic care of the young and efforts to ensure quality work in the programmes for youth employment, MYS provided support to the foundation and operation of the National Association of Youth Work Practitioners (NAYWP) founded in March 2009. It currently has 77 organization members conducting youth work in the territory of the Republic of Serbia. Foundation of NAYWP meant that there is a body on the national level which will deal with professionalization and ensuring the quality of youth work. The project “Support to national efforts to promote youth employment and migration management” is the joint project of four UN organization (UNDP, UNICEF, ILO, IOM) initiated in May 2009 and will last until 2012. The project is intended for the people for whom it is hard to find employment, especially Romas returnees pursuant to Readmission agreement, as well as the other social groups threatened by social exclusion. It is suggested to include 3,000 young people in the measures of active employment policy. In the course of 2009 pursuant to the Agreement between UNDP and NES the Fund for Youth Employment was founded. In addition to the funds from the state budget, the Fund is also financed from the donation of the Spanish fund for achieving the millennium development goals. The project “Promotion of the Youth Employment” started in July 2009 and is intended to the unemployed young people of 15 to 30 years of age with a low level of education. The goal of the Project is to find solutions for particular difficulties that the young come across when entering the labour market – low level of education, a lack of work experience, through complex intervention combining information on labour market, assistance in finding job, counselling about employment, professional education and subsidized employment. The project is implemented by ILO – Subregional office for Central and East Europe and NES and will last until 2011. Also, within the project “Balkan youth and health” supported by CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency) and implemented jointly by the Ministry of Health in Novi Sad, Novi Pazar and Novi Beograd, youth councils in the local health stations were empowered. In these three towns, i.e. municipalities, 1,309 young people were trained for prevention of addiction diseases (drug addiction, alcoholism, smoking), protection of reproductive health, HIV prevention, proper diet and violence prevention. The activities were implemented by donated funds. Supported by UNICEF and within the project of advancement of the health of young people peer educators were trained in 6 towns in the field of advancement of reproductive health and prevention of addiction diseases, of whom 5 teams of the young Romas who involved over 700 peers in health education. Mobilization and education of several thousands young were continued through Y PEER network activities, i.e. the peer educators network and “Dance 4 life” projects developed by the support of UNICEF and UNFPA. The implementation of the tasks planned in APNYS enabled the young in the Republic of Serbia to participate largely in the EU programme “The young in action”. The
11 Republic of Serbia participated in two fields of this programme: Cooperation of the neighbouring countries and European volunteer services. In 2009 youth organizations and associations from the Republic of Serbia were partners in 103 projects within the Cooperation of neighbouring countries with 472 young participants. Within the programme European volunteer services, Republic of Serbia was a partner on 58 projects with 36 volunteers. Youth organizations from the Republic of Serbia have recognized the programme “The Young in Action” as a tool for daily work. In 2009 contact points for this European Commission programme (NGO “Let’s...” and Educational centre of Krusevac) organized National training of multiplicators for “The young in action” to use and promote the programme “Young in Action” on the local level. A large increase in applications coming from the Republic of Serbia on central level is noticeable (ЕАCЕА, 200 submitted projects for the period 2007 2009), as well as large increase of the approved projects (youth exchange: from 66 projects in 2007 to 103 projects in 2009, ЕBS: from 29 projects in 2007 to 58 projects in 2009; the success rate is 45%). Organizations underline the interest for the programme “Youth in action” as a tool for raising capacities in youth work and for creating partnership with organizations from abroad. Further on, youth organizations from the Republic of Serbia find that the most relevant goals of the programme “Youth in action” are intercultural learning, intercultural, interethnic and interreligious dialogue and the increase of mobility of young people, enabling the acquisition of important social and educational skills. An increase of number of participants in youth exchange is expected, since visas are no more needed for EU countries, which will save money for participation, time, and energy and enable some young people to travel for the first time to EU countries.
1.4.5 Implemented partnerships
In the course of implementation of activities and projects numerous partnerships have been achieved, as well as cooperation on the local, national and international level. Besides the partnerships and cooperation which the APNYS defines as joint responsibilities for the implementation of activities and projects, other connections have been established too. Particularly numerous are the partnerships achieved within the projects implemented by associations, because most of the projects were implemented jointly by two or more partners, most often on the local level. The effect of these partnerships contributed to create a favourable context for the participation of the young people, for creating new forms and renewing old forms of cooperation among various actors dealing with young people. Implementation of project activities and establishing partnerships contributed to raising the awareness of the local community about the importance of working with the young, as well as the levele of awareness of the young about their real position in society, and the importance of personal engagement (youth activism) for improvement of their status. Partnerships included six categories of partners: local government (youth offices), associations, business sector, informal groups, public institutions, international organizations and other groups. The protagonists of the APNYS implementation were asked to evaluate (in their answers to the questionnaire MYS asked them to fill out) partnerships on the APNYS projects implementation with each category of partners using the scale from 1 to 5. All partners were evaluated differently, none of the categories received the highest grade, and no homogenization of grades was achieved. Associations received the best average grade – 4.47, then public institutions – 4.39, international organizations – 3.83, informal groups – 3.63. The partnership with business sector received the lowest grade – 2.84.
12 In the Republic of Serbia the programme “School without violence” has been implemented in all elementary schools upon the UNICEF initiative since 2005, and since 2009 in Serbian high schools too, in order to prevent violence in educational and learning institutions. Ministry of Education, MLSP, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Health, MYS, Council for the Rights of the Child, the Institute for advancement of education and learning, and Regional Education Secretariat have been included in the project.
“We have established cooperation with six towns and municipalities through youth offices and associations, we enabled a better information flow among local communities regarding the activities on prevention of psychoactive substances abuse, we organized a network of peer education volunteers and founded IPON network (Initiative of the Young Against Drug Abuse) to conduct joint campaigns, education, exchange programmes, advise and counsel, etc. A significant benefit of the project is the cooperation with NGO Iskra, Loznica, and its expert team who implemented the peer education programme and enabled us to advance knowledge and skills of our volunteers and to apply their education programme in our local community (Valjevo) and other towns involved in the project.”
Association Good People , Valjevo
“An important aspect which, besides the interesting campaign, contributed to a successful implementation of project activities is openness of the tender for informal youth groups with whom we have worked together for the first time now. This move allowed the young who are not active and who are not members of any association to organize and apply to the tender with their ideas for the improvement of life in their environment. The result was 71 applications of the informal groups and 51 organizations. The implementation of nine actions was entrusted to informal groups, and only three – to the organizations. A large number of applications came from the rural environment. Three actions were implemented in villages.”
European movement in SERBIA
1.4.6 Financing the NYS implementation
Financing the APNYS activities and projects implementation was directly taken care of by the protagonists themselves, on the basis of the planned budget funds, particularly by the ministries, state bodies, organizations and institutions. Besides, SGU directly financed certain activities on the local level. The structure and volume of the funds cannot be shown by items since many protagonists presented their funds in total for all categories of users, therefore we couldn’t obtain reliable information on how many young of 18 to 30 years of age were involved. МYС through its Youth Sector obtained funds for the NYS implementation directly from the Republic of Serbia’s budget in the amount of RSD 628,880,733.00, including the funds from the Serbian Fund for Young Talents. In 2009 international donnors allocated funds for the projects focused on NYS implementation together with MYS and local self governments in the amount of RSD 170,000,000.00. APNYS outlines that MYS should allocate RSD 180,760,500 for the APNYS implementation in 2009 from the budget and RSD 511,000,000.00 for the Fund for Young Talents. It is also outlined that MYS through international donations for APNYS implementation should allocate RSD 85,858,000.00. International donations secured more than the planned funds, whereas budget revision in 2009 decreased the approved budget funds for MYS. However, in its internal distribution MYS managed to secure almost all planned funds for APNYS implementation.
13
1.4.7 Effects of activities and projects implementation – lessons learned
Effects of APNYS activities and projects implementation are many and can be viewed from several aspects: а) in relation to APNYS implementation; b) in relation to the institutional frame through which the activities and projects are implemented; c) in relation to the planned results; d) in relation to the project sustainability; e) in relation to the benefit the young get from the activity/project.
а) APNYS implementation
As for APNYS implementation, the prevailing attitude says that even a larger number of the young can become active and interested in youth activism. The participants’ opinion is that, in addition to broader youth participation and initiatives, it is necessary to network more and more state bodies, organizations and institutions in local community to carry out specific activities for the successful APNYS implementation. For this kind of networking, the following is ecessary: o To inform more young people about the LYO activities; o To include more young people in volunteering; o To promote and inform the schools in local community about APNYS.
The protagonists of the implementation think that it is necessary to inform and educate more professionals in the local community about: o The youth policy implementation and NYS goals; o Equal human rights of all the young regardless of their “diversity”; o The term and significance of the integration of the young from the socially vulnerable groups in local community and inclusive education.
One of the main lessons regarding the APNYS implementation is that it is essential to work with the relevant youth groups, individuals, organizations and institutions more intensively in order to understand better APNYS goals and tasks. Civil associations find it necessary to promote APNYS more actively in public events, lectures, the media, which would make APNYS implementation more visible. In the protagonists’ opinion, APNYS is extremely important for the advancement of the position of the young in Serbia and any kind of support to its implementation through various projects is welcome. Every organization dealing with the young can easily find its own goals in the document.
b) Institutional context
In the protagonists’ opinion, particularly the opinion of the associations, newly established youth offices should be additionally empowered and strenghtened so that they become recognized by the local self government and the young. It has also been said that the young in small, under developed environment are not well informed about the possibility to implement local initiatives. A more active APNYS promotion has been recommended in
14 small local communities to contribute to a more active role of the young in the life of the community. Participants noticed that organizations and institutions in the local community grasp the real importance of some initiatives, projects, activities only after their implementation has begun and when specific activities show to be successful and the results can be seen. Before that, they remain reserved and skeptical instead of initiating these concepts significant for a wide local community. It is necessary to take initiative, be optimistic and ready to fight the problems of all social categories.
c) Planned results
Protagonists pointed out the lessons they learned and they can be summarized as follows: o The planning process is necessary for successful implementation. Both processes require maximum engagement of all participants; o Most implementation protagonists agree that they carried out most of the planned activities. Some civil associations pointed out the problems they encountered because their plans were too ambitious; o In some situations, the implementation overreached the plans, for instance in the field of adoption of youth work standards when the processes of drafting and adoption of quality assurance standards, as well as the process of NAPOR foundation (National association of youth work practitioners) surpassed the expected results. The results can be seen in high motivation and recognition of the importance of this issue by many organizations involved in the process.
d) Sustainability of the achieved results
When asked to explain what they learned about sustainability of the achieved results from the projects implementation, the representatives of associations which participated in the implementation underlined the following: o “Since the priority of every organization is to spread and have sustainable development, we are convinced that the knowledge we gained will be used in the best possible way, as well as promotional material. The stepse we took will be helpful for these organizations to extend their membership and find means for their further work.” o “Since the young are a fluctuating population, sustainability of the results will be questionable until all institutions dealing with the young strengthen so much as to be able to constantly provide services for career guidance and counselling.” o “Sustainability of the project is made possible through the inclusion of LYO into project implementation, the inclusion of more institutions from the local community, joint work on the selection of participants from the marginalized groups.” o “Sustainability of results in large part was transferred to the local self government institutions, which is extremely important for candidates who passed trainings, because they are accepted in the local office of the NES and we believe this will have some effects in the future period.” o “Achived results represent a prerequisite for creating the monitoring standards and mechanisms, defining and approving the occupational standards and availability of education. Strategically speaking, the first phase of the process was targeted at finding the critical mass, and the sustainability aspect was seen as raising the awareness of the civil society organizations, as well as opening a certain number 15 of youth offices which, in a consultative process, realized the extreme importance of the issue and necessity to solve the problem.”
e) Benefit the young obtained from APNYS activities implementation and from the Fund for Young Talents’ work
The analysis of the responses shows that the benefits are multiple. The established partnerships and joint work of organizations belonging to different sectors contributed to the improvement of quality of the future work and strengthening of the youth activism in local communities. The young received specific knowledge and skills necessary for various activities, personal development and participation in life of their community. Besides, LYO were promoted and empowered for further work with the young:
o The young are directly empowered with knowledge, techniques and skills necessary for a non violent and partner reaction; o The young are informed, mobilized, respected and encouraged to be active; o The young are networked with peer educators, and many internet social networks were initiated where they can organize themselves and carry out numerous activities which are not planned by the project, but surpass it to a large extent; o Schools are motivated to recognize and point to violence, to react to it by non violent means, which can make pupils feel safer and more respected; o Local communities recognize the problems of the young, consult them and together they reach a solution; they initiate and support the activities of the young, because of which the young are not seen as a problem, but as a resource.
The young are encouraged to think about differences with the perspective of equality in their minds and to try to find alternative, non violent approaches to conflicts. One of the effects is to encourage the young to recognize different forms of violence, to call them violent and to identify them in their environment. Significant effects have been achieved in the field of exercising rights to equal opportunities of all young people in society, particularly those who live in difficult conditions and belong to vulnerable social groups. The projects influenced the reduced prejudices against the young from the vulnerable groups and better informed public about their rights, position and opportunities, as well as youth empowerment through trainings and local actions.
Benefit for the young from socially sensitive groups: o Equal opportunities were given to the young from socially sensitive groups for self development, identity and respect; o Reduction of discriminatory behaviour, direct and active participation of the young from LYO in the integration of the young from socially vulnerable groups in the local community; o Sensibilization of the young in LYO for the needs of the young from socially sensitive groups and the way of their integration in the local community.
In June 2009 the Serbian Fund for Young Talents rendered the Decision on the changes and amendments of its Decision on Education (Official Gazette of RS no. 44/09) which allows awarding of the scholarships to the students who will continue their studies in the EFTA countries (European Free Trade Association) and at the leading universities in the world. In 2009 the Fund announced three tenders for the young talents and provided
16 scholarships for 1,845 students. The total budget resources for the Fund for Young Talents in 2009 were equal to RSD 469,964,000.00. Besides scholarships and awards, the Fund for Young Talents to its scholarship holders, through cooperation with significant institutions (Microsoft, Jat Airways, NES, Serbian National Library, Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences etc.) provided additional activities and favourable opportunities which will be of great help for their future education and professional development . The Fund also opened the Centre for Career Guidance and Counselling whose main task is to help the young to choose their future employment and line of professional work, and to provide professional and academic orientation. The main idea of the Fund is to send a clear message to the young that the state is determined to help them and participate in the education of pupils and students, and that the state values their efforts and hard work.
1.4.7 Restrictions
Questions about the restrictions of the project implementation were mostly answered by associations. The majority of protagonists found no major restrictions in the project implementation. If any, the restrictions were of financial nature, insufficient financial funds, restricted number of participants in comparison to the number of interested persons, insufficient number of participants from the local self government, in some towns LYO representatives were not interested enough to implement the projects, or the professional sector wasn’t interested either.
1.4.8 Conclusion
Based on the analysis of the received reports it can be concluded that a significant progress in the APNYS implementation has been made in the first implementation year, and that a process of strategic and conceptual changes has started when it comes to the role of young people in society. In the implemented activities and projects the awareness of the young about their active role in the local community has been raised, as well as about the importance of youth work, and a significant role was given to the youth office which, most often in cooperation with associations and local self government, achieved significant results and effects, either conceptual or strategic, or promotional, or other actions for the young. Huge progress was made in connecting, cooperation and joint work of formal and informal youth organizations in the Republic of Serbia. Many youth offices in local communities were coordinators for that cooperation and a bridge for network of associations, youth organizations and institutions. In this way, formal and informal youth groups were strengthened and networks of associates from partner EU organizations were established. It can be concluded that the process of creating the information youth system was initiated and this specific goal was fulfilled to a large degree. The young have a possibility to get the information about the cultural affairs which they may find interesting in their free time, or about the matters which directly promote mobility and intercultural cooperation. Effects of these activities are visible not only in the degree of achievement of expected results , but also in a number of formal sustainable decisions which turn some activities into a system supportive of the young. Financing of the APNYS activities and projects implementation was completed by the protagonists themselves on the basis of the planned budget resources. This is, first of all, the case with the ministries and other state bodies, organizations and institutions. Besides, many SGU directly financed specific activities on the local level. The structure and volume of
17 resources cannot be shown item by item because many protagonists showed their resources in total for all categories of participants so that a totally reliable information on how many young people of the age between 18 and 30 were involved cannot be obtained. МYS, through the Youth Secretariat used the funds for the NYS implementation from the budget of the Republic of Serbia in the amount of RSD 628,880,733.00, including the funds for the Serbian Fund for Young Talents. In 2009 international donnors allocated funds for the projects focused on NYS implementation and implemented jointly by MYS and local self governments in the amount of nearly EUR 1,500,000 and $ 240,000.00.
18 APNYS – activities planned for 2009
GENERAL GOAL 1: To encourage the young to participate actively in society
No. Activities Deadlines Expected result/goal Competent body
Specific objective: 1.Providing support for and financing the initiatives 1.1. To motivate, educate and support the young to 2009–2014 and programmes of the listed youth associations participate actively in society and associations dealing with young people
To render the Directive on drawing the programmes about the appropriation and spending The funds on appropriation 481 used for financing the Government; 2009 1.1.1. of funds for programmes and projects of the the programmes and projects of youth associations MYS as a proposer; and further on every year associations dealing with youth policy in 2009 and associations dealing with the young MF. (appropriation 481)
To provide financial support to initiatives and Financing the programmes and initiatives, 2009 MYS; 1.1.2. programmes which motivate, educate and support monitoring and planning of implementation and and further on every year PSSO. the young to participate actively in society advancement of financing criteria
Provide support to the programmes of youth SGU support the organizing, strengthening the 2009 1.1.3. associations and associations dealing with the capacities and implementation of activities of youth SGU and further on every year young on the local level associations and associations with the young