Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 13 | Number 1 Article 4 1985 The onfideC ntiality Rule: A Philosophical Perspective with Reference to Jewish Law and Ethics Gordon Tucker Jewish Theological Seminary of America Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Gordon Tucker, The Confidentiality Rule: A Philosophical Perspective with Reference to Jewish Law and Ethics, 13 Fordham Urb. L.J. 99 (1985). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol13/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. THE CONFIDENTIALITY RULE: A PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE WITH REFERENCE TO JEWISH LAW AND ETHICS Gordon Tucker* I. Introduction The Model Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers (Rules) were adopted in 1983 by the American Bar Association (ABA).' Rule 1.6, one of the more controversial components of the Rules, treats the subject of confidentiality between a client and his attorney. 2 The controversy over Rule 1.6 centers on its failure to resolve the conflict among the competing values of the individual's right to counsel, the interest of society in a fair and accessible system of justice and the need to preserve social order and citizen security. When competing values represent important social and individual interests, as in the case of Rule 1.6, a solution is particularly difficult to achieve.