DOCSLIB.ORG

Jerusalem - City of Law and Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jerusalem - City of Law and Justice JERUSALEM - CITY OF LAW AND JUSTICE JERUSALEM CITY OF LAW AND JUSTICE Edited By NAHUM RAKOVER The Library of Jewish Law The Library of Jewish Law Ministry of Justice The Jewish Legal Heritage Society PROCEEDINGS of the Third International Seminar on The Sources of Contemporary Law: Jerusalem - City of Law and Justice Jerusalem, July 1996 © The Library of Jewish Law The Jewish Legal Heritage Society P.O,Box 7483 Jerusalem 91074 Printed in Israel 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 9 OPENING ADDRESS, Nahum Rakover 11 GREETINGS BY THE PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL, Ezer Weizman 13 GREETINGS BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, Aharon Barak 15 GREETINGS BY THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE, Ya'akov Ne'eman 19 GREETINGS BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ISRAEL BAR, Dror Hoter-Ishai 23 JERUSALEM AND THE TEMPLE MOUNT Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron THRONES OF JUDGMENT AT YOUR GATES, 0 JERUSALEM 25 David D. Frankel TEMPLE MOUNT - ACCESS AND PRAYER 35 David A. Thomas A CONCISE LEGAL HISTORY OF JERUSALEM 43 Menashe Har-El JERUSALEM THE HOLY CITY IN JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM 59 Abdul Hadi Palazzi JERUSALEM: THREE-FOLD RELIGIOUS HERITAGE FOR A CONTEMPORARY SINGLE ADMINISTRATION 77 Shlomo Slonim CHANGES IN THE ATTITUDE OF THE VATICAN ON THE ISSUE OF JERUSALEM 85 Malvina Halberstam THE JERUSALEM EMBASSY ACT: U.S. RECOGNITION OF JERUSALEM AS THE CAPITAL OF ISRAEL 101 5 Contents ISRAEL AS A JEWISH AND DEMOCRATIC STATE Eliezer Schweid ISRAEL AS A JEWISH-DEMOCRATIC STATE: HISTORICAL AND THEORETICAL ASPECTS 125 Asher Maoz THE VALUES OF A JEWISH AND DEMOCRATIC STATE 147 Jacob Bazak ISRAELI LAW IN THE VIEW OF HALAKHAH 173 HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE INDIVIDUAL Nahum Rakover THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN DIGNITY 187 Irwin Cotler HATE SPEECH, EQUALITY AND THE LIMITS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE AS A CASE-STUDY 229 Moshe Ish-Horowicz RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE AND DIVERSITY IN JUDAISM 249 Herbert Druks RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE JEWS IN EARLY AMERICAN HISTORY 263 Alan J. Yuter PERSON AND PROPERTY IN JEWISH LEGAL THOUGHT 287 PENAL LAW, EVIDENCE, RESPONSIBILITY Leah Bornstein­ JEWISH INFORMERS IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE Makovetsky IN THE 16th-17th CENTURIES 309 Yehoshua Ben-Meir CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE 325 Richard A. Freund INTER-GENERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 359 Bernard w. Freedman THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT ... ? - COUNSEL'S ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES 381 6 Contents LAW AND MEDICINE J. David Bleich SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD 389 Yosef Rivlin ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION, IVF AND SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: IMPLICATIONS FOR INHERITANCE LAW 415 Sharon Levy EUTHANASIA: WITHHOLDING TREATMENT: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS 431 Rivka Katz MEDICAL ETHICS 441 INFLUENCE OF JEWISH LAW ON OTHER LEGAL SYSTEMS Neil H. Cogan MOSAIC EQUALITY IN AMERICA 451 Jonathan Fisher SELF-INCRIMINATION AT COMMON LAW - ITS ORIGIN IN JEWISH LAW 461 Osman Zumrut THE INFLUENCE OF JEWISH LAW ON ISLAMIC LEGAL PRACTICE 475 Sinaida De Gregorio THE INFLUENCE OF JEWISH LAW Letio ON BRAZILIAN LAW - MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE 485 APPENDIX SEMINAR PROGRAM 499 7 PREFACE The volume herewith presented to the reader comprises the proceed­ ings of an international seminar on "Jerusalem - City of Law and Jus­ tice," held at Jerusalem in June 1996. Most of the papers delivered at the sessions are reproduced here, some in translation from the original Hebrew. This was the third in a series of seminars on "The Sources of Con­ temporary Law." The first seminar in the series dealt with "The Bible and Talmud and their Contribution to Modem Legal Systems," and the proceedings were published in a volume entitled Jewish Law and Current Legal Problems. The topic of the second seminar was "Mai­ monides as Codifier of Jewish Law," and the proceedings were pub­ lished under that title. Like its predecessors, the present seminar was held under the aus­ pices of the Israel Ministry of Justice, the Hebrew University of Jeru­ salem, the Israel Bar and the New York County Lawyers' Association, presided over by Mr. Klaus Eppler. Participants included approxi­ mately 200 men and women of different religions - Jewish, Christian and Muslim - from different countries. The opening session was held in the official residence of the Presi­ dent of Israel, with the participation of some of the most distinguished representatives of this country's judicial system, judges, rabbis and scholars. The greetings by President Weizman and other guests at that session appear at the beginning of the volume, followed by the open- 9 Preface ing lecture of the seminar, by Chief Rabbi and President of the Su­ preme Rabbinical Court Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron. The organizing committee received a great number of lecture pro­ posals from both Israel and abroad. For that reason, it was decided to hold parallel sessions, in English and Hebrew, on some days of the seminar. The topic of the seminar, "Jerusalem - City of Law and Justice," was chosen as part of the celebration of the three thousandth anniver­ sary of Jerusalem as capital of Israel. A few sessions were accordingly devoted to Jerusalem itself, its legal and international status and its position in the different monotheistic faiths. Some papers discussed the Temple Mount and rights of access to it and prayer there. Other ses­ sions dealt with the ideas represented by Jerusalem as "City of Law and Justice" - equity and human dignity, as well as ethics in the fields of administration and medicine. A few lectures considered constitu­ tional matters and questions relating to Israel as a Jewish and demo­ cratic state. Some time after the seminar, one of the most distinguished world figures in Jewish Studies, Professor Isadore Twersky, passed away. Professor Twersky was a leading member of the Jewish Legal Heritage Society and served on the Advisory Committee of the seminar. The society derived considerable encouragement from his evaluations of its various research projects and of its activities for the advancement of Jewish Law in Israel and in the world at large. Yehi zichro baruch. An important contribution to the preparation of this seminar was made by Professor Charles Philips, who also helped in the first stage of the editorial work for the present volume. Mr. David Louvish was responsible for some of the editorial work, and Mr. Moshe Kaplan assisted in preparing the material for the press. I am indebted to them all. N.R. Jerusalem, Israel 5758 - 1998 10 OPENING ADDRESS Nahum Rakover Mr. President; President of the Supreme Rabbinical Court R. Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron; your Honors President of the Supreme Court Prof. Aharon Barak, State Comptroller Mrs. Miriam Ben-Porat and Justice Moshe Landau; Chief Rabbis of Jerusalem and Haifa; Minis­ ter of Justice Prof. Yaakov Ne'eman; President of the Israel Bar As­ sociation Mr. Dror Hoter-Ishai and President of the New York County Lawyers' Association Mr. Klaus Eppler; Supreme Court Jus­ tices past and present, including our friend and colleague Justice Haim H. Cohn; Religious Court Judges; Rabbis, Magistrates, Ladies and Gentlemen. This is the third in a series of seminars devoted to the contribution of Jewish Law to modem legal systems. Like its predecessors, this seminar is being held under the auspices of the Israel Ministry of Justice and under the aegis of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Israel Bar Association and the New York County Lawyers' As­ sociation. The participants have come from fourteen countries and are of different faiths - Jews, Christians and Muslims. Our topic is Jerusalem - City of Law and Justice. There is surely no need to elaborate on the special relationship between Jerusalem and Law, Jerusalem and Justice. It was the Jewish people who gave the world the basic values of law and justice, of human rights. Our object in this seminar is to stress the contribution of Jewish sources not only to the classical legal systems - that contribution is now a 11 r Opening Address matter of common knowledge - but also, and in particular, the vital significance of Jewish law and sources for modem jurisprudence, here and now. We tend at times to place greater emphasis on what we have received from others, and less on what we have and what we have given to other nations. I would like to think that one out­ come of this gathering, as of its predecessors, will be the realization that the legal systems of many other nations have taken up and as­ similated ideas originally propounded in Jewish Law; in many cases, our own system has given birth to ideas that other nations were at first unwilling or unprepated to embrace. I am indeed convinced that much of contemporary Jewish Law will ultimately find its way into the legal systems of the world at large. Jerusalem - that same Jerusalem which is constantly occupying the forefront of the national and international stage - has always been the City of Law and Justice. I do not wish to bore you, and neither would it be proper to mention only some of our speakers. Neverthe­ less, I would like to refer specifically to one lecture, that of our dis­ tinguished visitor, Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi of Rome. Professor Palazzi, Director of the Istituto Culturale della Comunita Islamica ltaliana in Rome, will speak on the sanctity of Jerusalem to the Jew­ ish people. The sources that he intends to quote, from both the Bible and the Koran, indicate that, just as Mecca is sacred to Islam, so is Jerusalem sacred to Judaism. He sees no contradiction in the fact that Jerusalem, also sacred to the Muslims, should be under Jewish sov­ ereignty. As he tells us, he is no politician; he is merely giving us the benefit of his opinion as a theologian, a religious scholar: there is nothing wrong, he says, with Jerusalem being the undivided capital of the Jewish State, under Israeli sovereignty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jerusalem in Classical Ages: a Critical Review
    Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 14, No 2, pp. 139-154 Copyright © 2014 MAA Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. JERUSALEM IN CLASSICAL AGES: A CRITICAL REVIEW Sultan Abdullah Ma'ani1, Abd alrzaq Al-Maani 2, Mohammed Al-Nasarat2 1Queen Rania Institute of Tourism and Heritage, Hashemite University, Jordan 2Department of History, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma’an, Jordan Received: 07/10/2013 Accepted: 06/12/2013 Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT This study is a review and in several cases it sheds light upon the history of Jerusalem City during the Roman and Byzantine epochs through focusing on a) the demography of the city, b) the names which had been mentioned in historical sources, c) ancient inscrip- tions and d) its urban design. The review goes through Jewish sources, particularly those which deal with the reign of the Roman leader, Pompey (Pompey the Great) and the Maccabees (Machabees); the reign of the Roman Emperor, Titus, during which the Jews were tortured; the reign of the Roman king of Jews, Herod (or Herod the Great); the reign of the Roman Emperor, Ha- drian; and the converting of the City from paganism to Christianity. KEYWORDS: Jerusalem, Roman epoch, Byzantine epoch, Hasmonean dynasty, historical sources, inscriptions. 140 MA'ANI et al 1. DEMOGRAPHY OF THE CITY The Jewish historian, Josephus, said that Herod built in the City a sports stadium and Jerusalem is a city fenced with valleys, a horse-racing hippodrome (Al-Fanny, 2007, situated above a mountains range in Central p.15). Palestine. This range extends between the Jerusalem, as the other big cities of Pales- Palestinian coast to the west and the Negev tine and Syria, uses the Latin language as an desert to both the east and south.
    [Show full text]
  • Source Sheet on Prohibitions on Loshon Ha-Ra and Motzi Shem Ra and Disclosing Another’S Confidential Secrets and Proper Etiquette for Speech
    Source Sheet on Prohibitions on Loshon ha-ra and motzi shem ra and disclosing another’s confidential secrets and Proper Etiquette for Speech Deut. 24:9 - "Remember what the L-rd your G-d did unto Miriam by the way as you came forth out of Egypt." Specifically, she spoke against her brother Moses. Yerushalmi Berachos 1:2 Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai said, “Had I been at Mount Sinai at the moment when the torah was given to Yisrael I would have demanded that man should have been created with two mouths- one for Torah and prayer and other for mundane matters. But then I retracted and exclaimed that if we fail and speak lashon hara with only one mouth, how much more so would we fail with two mouths Bavli Arakhin15b R. Yochanan said in the name of R.Yosi ben Zimra: He who speaks slander, is as though he denied the existence of the Lord: With out tongue will we prevail our lips are our own; who is lord over us? (Ps.12:5) Gen R. 65:1 and Lev.R. 13:5 The company of those who speak slander cannot greet the Presence Sotah 5a R. Hisda said in the name of Mar Ukba: When a man speaks slander, the holy one says, “I and he cannot live together in the world.” So scripture: “He who slanders his neighbor in secret…. Him I cannot endure” (Ps. 101:5).Read not OTO “him’ but ITTO “with him [I cannot live] Deut.Rabbah 5:10 R.Mana said: He who speaks slander causes the Presence to depart from the earth below to heaven above: you may see foryourselfthat this is so.Consider what David said: “My soul is among lions; I do lie down among them that are aflame; even the sons of men, whose teeth are spears and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword” (Ps.57:5).What follows directly ? Be Thou exalted O God above the heavens (Ps.57:6) .For David said: Master of the Universe what can the presence do on the earth below? Remove the Presence from the firmament.
    [Show full text]
  • Case #2 United States of America (Respondent)
    Model International Court of Justice (MICJ) Case #2 United States of America (Respondent) Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America) Arkansas Model United Nations (AMUN) November 20-21, 2020 Teeter 1 Historical Context For years, there has been a consistent struggle between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine led by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 2018, United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. embassy located in Tel Aviv would be moving to the city of Jerusalem.1 Palestine, angered by the embassy moving, filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2018.2 The history of this case, U.S. relations with Israel and Palestine, current events, and why the ICJ should side with the United States will be covered in this research paper. Israel and Palestine have an interesting relationship between war and competition. In 1948, Israel captured the west side of Jerusalem, and the Palestinians captured the east side during the Arab-Israeli War. Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948. In 1949, the Lausanne Conference took place, and the UN came to the decision for “corpus separatum” which split Jerusalem into a Jewish zone and an Arab zone.3 At this time, the State of Israel decided that Jerusalem was its “eternal capital.”4 “Corpus separatum,” is a Latin term meaning “a city or region which is given a special legal and political status different from its environment, but which falls short of being sovereign, or an independent city-state.”5 1 Office of the President, 82 Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem § (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • West Bank and Gaza 2020 Human Rights Report
    WEST BANK AND GAZA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Palestinian Authority basic law provides for an elected president and legislative council. There have been no national elections in the West Bank and Gaza since 2006. President Mahmoud Abbas has remained in office despite the expiration of his four-year term in 2009. The Palestinian Legislative Council has not functioned since 2007, and in 2018 the Palestinian Authority dissolved the Constitutional Court. In September 2019 and again in September, President Abbas called for the Palestinian Authority to organize elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council within six months, but elections had not taken place as of the end of the year. The Palestinian Authority head of government is Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh. President Abbas is also chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization and general commander of the Fatah movement. Six Palestinian Authority security forces agencies operate in parts of the West Bank. Several are under Palestinian Authority Ministry of Interior operational control and follow the prime minister’s guidance. The Palestinian Civil Police have primary responsibility for civil and community policing. The National Security Force conducts gendarmerie-style security operations in circumstances that exceed the capabilities of the civil police. The Military Intelligence Agency handles intelligence and criminal matters involving Palestinian Authority security forces personnel, including accusations of abuse and corruption. The General Intelligence Service is responsible for external intelligence gathering and operations. The Preventive Security Organization is responsible for internal intelligence gathering and investigations related to internal security cases, including political dissent. The Presidential Guard protects facilities and provides dignitary protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generic Transformation of the Masoretic Text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah
    Durham E-Theses Wine, women and work: the generic transformation of the Masoretic text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah Hardy, John Christopher How to cite: Hardy, John Christopher (1995) Wine, women and work: the generic transformation of the Masoretic text of Qohelet 9. 7-10 in the Targum Qohelet and Qohelet Midrash Rabbah, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5403/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 WINE, WOMEN AND WORK: THE GENERIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE MA50RETIC TEXT OF QOHELET 9. 7-10 IN THE TARGUM QOHELET AND QOHELET MIDRASH RABBAH John Christopher Hardy This tnesis seeks to understand the generic changes wrought oy targum Qonelet and Qoheiet raidrash rabbah upon our home-text, the masoretes' reading ot" woh.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Have Interested Tltemselves in the Endeavour to Acquire Any
    TilE HALACHA AND THE HAGADA. ALL who have interested tltemselves in the endeavour to acquire any knowledge of the Talmud are aware that the Rabbis who have contributed to that strange· and enormous encyclop<edia of twelve folio volumes,. fa.ll into two schools-the Halachists and the Haga­ dists ; and although an Halachist might occasionally indulge himself in Hagadoth, and a Hagadist might sometimes distinguish himself in the Halacha, 1 yet the distinction between the two schools is so radical, that we cannot advance a step until it is completely grasped and understood. I. The origin, development, and intention of the HALACHA will, I think, be clear to any reader of my papers on the Oral Law in previous numbers of Tu1c: ExPOSITOR. 2 The word (of which the plural is Hilchoth or Halachoth) is derived from I-Ialak, "to walk," and simply means a rule, a decisive tradition, "the ultimate conclusion on a matter long debated.''3 No system of laws, and above all no system so brief as the Mosaic legislation in its earliest form, could possibly include all the vast varieties of human cir­ cumstance ; and since the law was regarded as in· finitely sacred in its minutest regulations, it was x For imtnnce, R. Levi Ben Sisi tried to unite the Ha gad a and the lblacha, as R. Jochnnan Den Zakkai had tried to do befo1e him. Hamburger, s. v. v. Agada and Jochanan. 2 February, March, and May, 1S77. 1 i1:~~i1, Halachah. "Apud Rahbinos et Thalmudi<:os est constitutio juri,, sententia, decisio, traditio decisa, et usu ac consuetudine recepta et approhata.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Law and Current Legal Problems
    JEWISH LAW AND CURRENT LEGAL PROBLEMS JEWISH LAW AND CURRENT LEGAL PROBLEMS EDITED BY NAHUM RAKOVER The Library of Jewish Law The Library of Jewish Law Ministry of Justice The Jewish Legal Heritage Society Foundation for the Advancement of Jewish Law PROCEEDINGS of the First International Seminar on The Sources Of Contemporary Law: The Bible and Talmud and Their Contribution to Modern Legal Systems Jerusalem. August 1983 © The Library of Jewish Law The Jewish Lcg<1l Heritage Society P.O.Box 7483 Jerusalem 91074 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 9 GREETINGS OF THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE, Moshe Nissim II LEGAL THEORY Haim H. Cohn THE LESSON OF JEWISH LAW FOR 15 LEGAL CHANGE Meyer S. Feldblum THE EMERGENCE OF THE HALAKHIC 29 LEGAL SYSTEM Classical and Modern Perceptions Norman Solomon EXTENSIVE AND RESTRICTIVE 37 INTERPRETATION LAW IN CHANGING SOCIETIES Yedidya Cohen THE KIBBUTZ AS A LEGAL ENTITY 55 Reuben Ahroni THE LEVIRATE AND HUMAN RIGHTS 67 JUDICIAL PROCESS Haim Shine COMPROMISE 77 5 POLITICAL THEORY Emanuel Rackman THE CHURCH FATHERS AND HEBREW 85 POLITICAL THOUGHT LAW AND RELIGION John Wade THE INFLUENCE OF RELIGION UPON LAW 97 Bernard J. Meis/in THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN AMERICAN 109 LAW PENAL LAW Ya'akov Bazak MAIMONIDES' VIEWS ON CRIME AND 121 PUNISHMENT Yehuda Gershuni EXTRADITION 127 Nahum Rakover COERCION IN CONJUGAL RELATIONS 137 SELF-INCRIMINATION Isaac Braz THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF­ 161 INCRIMINATION IN ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW The Influence of Jewish Law Arnold Enker SELF-INCRIMINATION 169 Malvina Halberstam THE RATIONALE FOR EXCLUDING 177 INCRIMINATING STATEMENTS U.S. Law Compared to Ancient Jewish Law Stanley Levin DUE PROCESS IN RABBINICAL AND 191 ISRAELI LAW Abuse and Subversion 6 MEDICAL ETHICS David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy War in Modern Judaism? "Mitzvah War" and the Problem of the "Three Vows" Author(S): Reuven Firestone Source: Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol
    Holy War in Modern Judaism? "Mitzvah War" and the Problem of the "Three Vows" Author(s): Reuven Firestone Source: Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 74, No. 4 (Dec., 2006), pp. 954- 982 Published by: Oxford University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4139958 Accessed: 18-08-2018 15:51 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the American Academy of Religion This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Sat, 18 Aug 2018 15:51:16 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Holy War in Modern Judaism? "Mitzvah War" and the Problem of the "Three Vows" Reuven Firestone "Holy war," sanctioned or even commanded by God, is a common and recurring theme in the Hebrew Bible. Rabbinic Judaism largely avoided discussion of holy war for the simple reason that it became dangerous and self-destructive. The failed "holy wars" of the Great Revolt and the Bar Kokhba Rebellion eliminated enthusiasm for it among the survivors engaged in reconstructing Judaism from ancient biblical religion. The rabbis therefore built a fence around the notion through two basic strat- egies: to define and categorize biblical wars so that they became virtually unthinkable in their contemporary world and to construct a divine con- tract between God, the Jews, and the world of the Gentiles that would establish an equilibrium preserving the Jews from overwhelming Gentile wrath by preventing Jewish actions that could result in war.
    [Show full text]
  • German Law in Israeli Courts
    German Law in Israeli Courts Nili Cohen Introduction: Alexander the Great as Comparatist Comparisons constitute a focal point for the perception of cultures, na- tions, and ourselves. The crux of comparison is the marking of dis- tinctions and similarities. Paradoxically, the scrutiny of differences can yield unifying factors and the affirmation of gaps can build bridges. Law, which is a normative system built on tradition and culture, has long been the object of comparative inquiry. The comparative study of law can be traced to antiquity. The Tal- mud tells of a meeting between Alexander the Great and the king of an imaginary state called Katsia.1 Alexander is interested in the gover- nance of that land and is invited by its monarch to attend a trial dealing with the purchase of a residence. The dispute, which concerns some treasure found in the house, takes an unexpected turn. Both the vendor and the purchaser claim that the treasure-trove belongs to the other: the purchaser argues that as he bought only the house, the treasure ought to be restored to the vendor, while the vendor argues that as he sold the house with its contents, the treasure should stay with the purchaser. The king of Katsia rules that the vendor’s son and the purchaser’s daughter should marry, with the treasure then becoming part of their common property. Alexander is shocked. In his kingdom, both claimants would have been beheaded, and the treasure would have been awarded to the king. Now it is the turn of the king of Katsia to be shocked.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlawed Visitors on Al-Haram Al-Sharif: Jews on the Temple Mount During the Ottoman and British Rule of Jerusalem, 1517–1967
    285 Outlawed Visitors on al-Haram al-Sharif: Jews on the Temple Mount during the Ottoman and British rule of Jerusalem, 1517–1967 By: F. M. LOEWENBERG* “The 144-dunam al-Aqsa Mosque/al-Haram al-Sharif is a place of wor- ship and prayer for Muslims only,” according to Zaid Lozi, Secretary- General of the Jordanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.1 This statement that the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is exclusively a Muslim holy site is not new, but merely repeats what has been a basic position of the Arab world for many centuries. Because of this belief non-Muslims were pro- hibited for centuries from going up on the Temple Mount. It is widely believed that no Jew ascended the Temple Mount in the 450 years prior to the Israel army’s capture of East Jerusalem in 1967.2 While there are many reports of Jewish activities on the Temple Mount in the millennium prior to the Ottoman conquest of Jerusalem in ,1517 3 after that date the ascent of Jews and all other non-Muslims was strictly prohibited. An unsubstantiated folktale has it that the Western Wall was awarded to the Jews as a place of Jewish prayer in compensation for any rights they previously had on the Temple Mount. Actually, the prohibition of Jews from going up to the Temple Mount was in effect already prior to the Ottoman conquest. Rabbi Oba- * I want to thank Rav Elisha Wolfson who in his recent book Har Habayit k- halakhah (Jerusalem: Divrei Shir, 2018) drew my attention to several rabbis who went up on the Temple Mount in the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940
    Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940 Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access Open Jerusalem Edited by Vincent Lemire (Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée University) and Angelos Dalachanis (French School at Athens) VOLUME 1 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/opje Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access Ordinary Jerusalem 1840–1940 Opening New Archives, Revisiting a Global City Edited by Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire LEIDEN | BOSTON Angelos Dalachanis and Vincent Lemire - 978-90-04-37574-1 Downloaded from Brill.com03/21/2019 10:36:34AM via free access This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC-ND License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. The Open Jerusalem project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) (starting grant No 337895) Note for the cover image: Photograph of two women making Palestinian point lace seated outdoors on a balcony, with the Old City of Jerusalem in the background. American Colony School of Handicrafts, Jerusalem, Palestine, ca. 1930. G. Eric and Edith Matson Photograph Collection, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/mamcol.054/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Dalachanis, Angelos, editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Absentee Property Law of 1950 Was Meant to Serve As the Legal Basis to Transfer the Property of Palestinian Refugees Into the Possession of the State of Israel
    Absentees against Their Will – Property Expropriation in East Jerusalem under the Absentee Property Law July 2010 Introduction The Absentee Property Law of 1950 was meant to serve as the legal basis to transfer the property of Palestinian refugees into the possession of the State of Israel. The law says that the land and property of Palestinian residents and nationals of Arab countries who, from November 29, 1947 until a declaration that the state of emergency declared in 1948 ended [which has not yet happened] were in one of the Arab countries, or "in any part of the Land of Israel that is outside of the area of Israel," would revert to the possession of the Custodian of Absentee Property, meaning, to the possession of the State.1 Following the annexation of East Jerusalem in 1967, and as a result the application of all of the laws of Israel -- including the Absentee Property Law -- to the annexed area, a problematic situation arose in which the property of almost all the Palestinian residents of the city became, in fact, absentee property, because those residents were at the time to which the law refers citizens of Jordan, then an enemy country, who resided in "a part of the Land of Israel that [was] outside of the area of Israel." To contend with this problematic situation, section 3 of the Law and Administration Ordinance 5730-1970 provides that the law does not apply to residents of East Jerusalem who "on the day of the incidence of the order of application of the law was in the area of its application and was a resident thereof."2 Therefore, only residents who were physically present in East Jerusalem on the day of annexation are not considered absentees.
    [Show full text]