DOCSLIB.ORG

Alamosa Creek, Section On, 74 Discussed, 69

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alamosa Creek, Section On, 74 Discussed, 69 INDEX Alamosa Creek, section on, 74 Dalton (Cont'd.) discussed, 69 lower part (Cont'd.) valley of, described, 62 depositional conditions, 17 Allison barren member of Mesaverde, 11 upper part, 14 Apishapa formation, 20 depositional conditions, 18 Arizona, sections in, 89 Datil formation, 64 Atarque, section near, 60 D-Cross Mountain, section at, 74 discussed, 36 discussed, 69 Atarque member of Mesaverde, 11,13 Deer Creek, section at, 91 age of, 35 Depositional conditions, 15 defined, 35 Detritus, rate of accumulation, 16, 17 Dilco coal member of Mesaverde, 5, 11, 14 Bartlett barren member of Mesaverde, 11 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 Bell Mountain sandstone, 67, 71 north of Chuska Mountains, 28 Bennett Peak, section west of, 51 south of Chuska Mountains, 30 Benton group, subdivisions, 20 Dilco-lower Gibson zone, 67, 70 Black Mesa, section at, 89 Durango, section near, 83 Cabezon, section at, 82 Environmental conditions, 15 Carlile shale, 20 Epicontinental seas, oscillating strandline in, 15 fauna of, 20, 22 Equilibrium, profile of, 17, 19 Carthage, section at, 87 Casa Salazar, section at, 81 Faunal zones, 21 Cebolleta Mesa, section near north end of, 72 at Point Lookout, 26 discussed, 67 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 section near south end of, 73 on San Juan River, 27 Cerrillos, section at, 85 Ferron sandstone, 23 Chaco River, section on, 48 "Gallego" sandstone, 67, 70 "Chamiso" formation, 67, 71 Gallina, section at, 82 Chamiso member of Mesaverde, 67, 71 Gallup, section near, 5, 78 Chinle formation, 7, 64 Gallup coal basin, Mesaverde in, 11 Chuska Mountains, section southwest of, 52 Gallup-Dilco regression, 95 correlated with section in southern San Juan Gallup sandstone member of Mesaverde, 5 Basin, 31 age of, 27, 28, 34 discussed, 30 defined, 11 Cliff House sandstone, 10, 15 depositional conditions, 18 Clifton, section at, 91 lower part of, 11, 13, 34,35 Colorado, sections in southwestern, 83 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 65, 67 Colorado group, 20 near Manuelito, 34 Colorado-Montana faunal boundary, relation in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 67 to Mancos-Mesaverde contact, 23, 24 north of Chuska Mountains, 27, 28 Dakota(?) sandstone, age of, 8 south of Chuska Mountains, 30 basal contact, 7 tongues at base of, 29, 34, 65 coal in, 8 upper part of, 11, 14, 34 conditions of deposition, 92 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 67 described, 7 Gibson coal member of Mesaverde, 5, 11 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 65 lower part of, 6 petrified wood in, 8 depositional conditions, 16 Dalton sandstone member of Mesaverde, 5,14 upper part of, 6 lower part, 14, 29 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 67 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955282/mem24-bm.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 102 INDEX Graneros shale, 20 Mancos-Mesaverde contact (Cont'd.) fauna of, 20, 21 relation to Colorado-Montana faunal bound- Greenhorn formation, 20 ary, 23, 24 fauna of, 20, 21 Manuelito, section near, 55 discussed, 34 Hogback Mountain, Mesaverde-Lewis contact McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, defined, 62 at, 12 "McElmo" formation, 7 section at, 48 Menefee formation, 10, 14 Homogenetic equivalence of Point Lookout Mesa Verde-Atarque area, defined, 2 sandstone and upper part of Hosta Mesaverde formation, age of, 25, 37 sandstone member of Mesaverde, 33,36 described, 11 Horsehead Creek, section on, 60 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 Horsehead tongue of Mancos shale, 9, 11, 13 age of, 67 age of, 35 Mesa Verde group, 9 defined, 35 thickness of, 11 Hosta sandstone member of Mesaverde, 6, 14 Mesa Verde National Park, log of water well, 44 lower part, 6, 14 Mesaverde regression, 96 south of Chuska Mountains, 31 "Miguel" formation, 66, 71 upper part, 6, 14 Mitchell's section at, 56 depositional conditions, 18 Montana group, 20 homogenetically equivalent to Point Look- Morrison formation, 7, 64 out sandstone, 33, 36 Mulatto tongue of Mancos shale, 6, 9, 14 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 67, 70 depositional conditions, 17 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 Inner mud line, 77 Mulatto transgression, 95 Intertonguing, causes of, 15 Lee quoted, 4 Navajo Indian Reservation, section at southern border of, 54 of Lewis shale and Cliff House sandstone, 12 correlated with section near Gallup, 32 of Mancos and Mesaverde, 13 discussed, 32 "Navajo" sandstone, 7, 64 Las Vegas, section at, 86 Navajo Springs, Mesaverde-Lewis contact at, 12 Late Carlile zone, 23, 26, 27, 29 Neritic line, 77 fauna of, 22 New Mexico, sections in eastern and southern, 83 Lewis shale, 11, 14 Niobrara formation, fauna of, 23 at Navajo Springs, 12 Niobrara group, subdivisions, 20 Lewis transgression, 97 Nutria Creek, section near, 57 Lower Gallup regression, 95 Lower Gibson regression, 95 Out-building of shore, 17 Mancos shale, age of, 23 Pagosa Springs, section at, 83 near Atarque, 35 Pescado Creek, section on, 58 described, 9 Pescado tongue of Mancos shale, 9, 11, 13 lower part, north of Chuska Mountains, 27, 30 age of, 34 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 65 defined, 34 age of, 65 depositional conditions, 17 thickness of, 9 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 65, 67 tongues of, 9 Pescado transgression, 95 upper part, north of Chuska Mountains, 27,30 Petrified wood, in Dakota(?), 8 Mancos-Mesaverde contact, age of, 24, 25, 28, Pictured Cliffs sandstone, 12,15 34,36 Pinedale, section at, 91 near Gallup, 11 Point Lookout, section at, 42 intertonguing relationship, 13 discussed, 25 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955282/mem24-bm.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 INDEX 103 Point Lookout sandstone, 14 Shoreline (Cont'd.) age of, 24 stable, 16 depositional conditions, 18 transgressive, 17 described, 10 "Stray" sandstone, 14, 28 homogenetically equivalent to upper part of depositional conditions, 17 Hosta sandstone member of Mesaverde, in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 33, 36 Subsidence, rate of, 16, 17 stratigraphie rise northward, 18, 24, 37 Profile of equilibrium, 17, 19 Telegraph Creek formation, fauna of, 23 "Punta de la Mesa" sandstone, 80 Three-dimensional correlation diagram, 77 Tijeras, section at, 83 Timpas formation, 20 Raton, section at, 86 fauna of, 20 Redrock Wash, section on, 45 Toadlena, section near, 52 Regression, and profile of equilibrium, 19 "Tocito lentil of Mancos", 11, 29 in sinking basin, 15 Transition zones, evidence of conformable Rio Puerco, section on, 79 deposition, 18 origin of, 17 San Andres Mountains, section in, 88 Très Hermanos sandstones, 32, 36, 65 San Juan Basin, eastern and southeastern parts probable tongues of Dakota (?), 93 of, 79 Two Wells, section near, 56 San Juan River, section adjacent to, 45, 48 Twowells sandstone lentil of Mancos, 22, 34 discussed, 27 age of, 36 Santa Rita, section near, 88 defined, 35 Satan tongue of Mancos shale, 6, 9, 14 Unconformities in Mesaverde, lack of, 19 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 67, 70 Upper Cretaceous sea, maximum extent, 93 Satan transgression, 96 Sequence of strata, 76 White Mountains, section at, 87 Shore line, causes of oscillations of, 15 regressive, 17 Zuni Mountain uplift, 64 in sinking basin, 15 "Zuni" sandstones, 7 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955282/mem24-bm.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Post-Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Northeastern Alaska by R
    Post-Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Northeastern Alaska By R. L. DETTERMAN, H. N. REISER, W. P. BROSGE,and]. T. DUTRO,JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 886 Sedirnentary rocks of Permian to Quaternary age are named, described, and correlated with standard stratigraphic sequences UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Detterman, Robert L. Post-Carboniferous stratigraphy, northeastern Alaska. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 886) Bibliography: p. 45-46. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:886 1. Geology-Alaska. I. Detterman, Robert L. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 886. QE84.N74P67 551.7'6'09798 74-28084 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02687-2 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ 1 Stratigraphy__:_Continued Introduction __________ ----------____ ----------------____ __ 1 Kingak Shale ---------------------------------------- 18 Purpose and scope ----------------------~------------- 1 Ignek Formation (abandoned) -------------------------- 20 Geographic setting ------------------------------------ 1 Okpikruak Formation (geographically restricted) ________ 21 Previous work and acknowledgments ------------------ 1 Kongakut Formation ----------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Mapping Variability of the Niobrara Formation
    UNDERSTANDING AND MAPPING VARIABILITY OF THE NIOBRARA FORMATION ACROSS WATTENBERG FIELD, DENVER BASIN by Nicholas Matthies A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date________________ Signed:____________________________________ Nicholas Matthies Signed:____________________________________ Dr. Stephen A. Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date:_______________ Signed:____________________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Wattenberg Field has been a prolific producer of oil and gas since the 1970s, and a resurgence of activity in recent years in the Niobrara Formation has created the need for a detailed study of this area. This study focuses on mapping regional trends in stratigraphy, structure, and well log properties using digital well logs, 3D seismic data, and core X-ray diffraction data. Across Wattenberg, the Niobrara is divided into the Smoky Hill Member (made up of A Chalk, A Marl, B Chalk, B Marl, C Chalk, C Marl, and Basal Chalk/Marl) and the Fort Hays Limestone Member. Directly beneath the Niobrara, the Codell Sandstone is the uppermost part of the Carlile Formation. Stratigraphic trends in these units are primarily due to differential compaction and compensational sedimentation. The largest structural trend is a paleo-high that runs east-west to northeast-southwest across the middle of the field. It has a relief of about 100 ft, and is 20 mi wide. The A Chalk and A Marl show evidence of submarine erosion over this area. Faults mapped from 3D seismic data are consistent with previously published data on a proposed polygonal fault system in the Denver Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and Adjacent
    Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and AdJa(-erit Parts of the Lewis Sliale and Lance Formation, East Flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, Southwest lo U.S. OEOLOGI AL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1532 Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and Adjacent Parts of the Lewis Shale and Lance Formation, East Flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, Southwest Wyoming By HENRYW. ROEHLER U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1532 Description of three of/lapping barrier shorelines along the western margins of the interior seaway of North America UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roehler, Henry W. Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills sandstone and adjacent parts of the Lewis shale and Lance formation, east flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, southwest Wyoming / by Henry W. Roehler. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1532) Includes bibliographical references. Supt.ofDocs.no.: I19.16:P1532 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cretaceous. 2. Geology Wyoming. 3. Fox Hills Formation. I. Geological Survey (U.S.). II. Title. III. Series. QE688.R64 1993 551.7T09787 dc20 92-36645 CIP For sale by USGS Map Distribution Box 25286, Building 810 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract......................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction................................................................................... 1 Formations exposed on the east flank of the Rock Springs Description and accessibility of the study area ................
    [Show full text]
  • Niobrara Total Petroleum System in the Southwestern Wyoming Province
    Chapter 6 Niobrara Total Petroleum System in the Southwestern Wyoming Province By Thomas M. Finn and Ronald C. Johnson Volume Title Page Chapter 6 of Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah By USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–D U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado: Version 1, 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Manuscript approved for publication May 10, 2005 ISBN= 0-607-99027-9 Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Schmitz, M. D. 2000. Appendix 2: Radioisotopic Ages Used In
    Appendix 2 Radioisotopic ages used in GTS2020 M.D. SCHMITZ 1285 1286 Appendix 2 GTS GTS Sample Locality Lat-Long Lithostratigraphy Age 6 2s 6 2s Age Type 2020 2012 (Ma) analytical total ID ID Period Epoch Age Quaternary À not compiled Neogene À not compiled Pliocene Miocene Paleogene Oligocene Chattian Pg36 biotite-rich layer; PAC- Pieve d’Accinelli section, 43 35040.41vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 42.3 m above base of 26.57 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U B2 northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 29034.16vE section Rupelian Pg35 Pg20 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 145.8 m above base 31.41 0.03 0.04 206Pb/238U 145.8, equivalent to GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section MCA/84-3 Pg34 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 142.8 m above base 31.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U 142.8 GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section Eocene Priabonian Pg33 Pg19 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 14.7 m above base of 34.50 0.04 0.05 206Pb/238U 14.7, equivalent to Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section MAS/86-14.7 Italy Pg32 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.9 m above base of 34.68 0.04 0.06 206Pb/238U 12.9 Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section Italy Pg31 Pg18 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.7 m above base of 34.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49E55
    Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49e55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes High-resolution calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Santonian/Campanian Stage boundary, Western Interior Basin, USA * Zachary A. Kita a, , David K. Watkins a, Bradley B. Sageman b a Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA article info abstract Article history: The base of the Campanian Stage does not have a ratified Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP); Received 26 June 2016 however, several potential boundary markers have been proposed including the base of the Scaphites leei Received in revised form III ammonite Zone and the base of the paleomagnetic Chron C33r. Calcareous nannofossil assemblages 25 August 2016 from the Smoky Hill Member of the Niobrara Formation in the central Western Interior Seaway, USA Accepted in revised form 28 August 2016 were analyzed from two localities to determine relevant biohorizons and their relationships to these Available online 30 August 2016 potential boundary markers. In a previous study, the Aristocrat Angus 12-8 core (Colorado) was astro- chronologically dated and constrained using macrofossil zonations and radiometric ages. The Smoky Hill Keywords: Calcareous nannofossils Member type area (Kansas) provides an expanded interval with good to excellent nannofossil Biostratigraphy preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado's New Oil Boom — the Niobrara
    Volume 13, Number 1 C OLORADO G EOLOGICAL S URVEY Spring 2011 Colorado’s New Oil Boom — the Niobrara Introduction Note from the Director: Niobrara shale oil is an exciting new by EOG Resources in October 2009 and hydrocarbon prospect for Colorado. produced 50,000 barrels of oil in its first “New oil boom.” Our resource-rich state, while having 90 days. After a year, it is still produc- The words stir developed extensive natural gas reserves ing more than 2,500 barrels of oil per excitement in the over the past couple of decades, is now month. This is significant given that the hearts of landmen, in the process of ‘rediscovering’ its oil average oil well in the U.S. generates just landowners, geol- in organic-rich shale. The current eco- 300 barrels of oil per month. Another ogists, engineers, nomics of fossil fuels, combined with well, the Gemini well drilled by Noble regulators, envi- the development of new drilling and Energy in early 2010, produced over ronmentalists, tax stimulation technologies, is driving this 32,000 barrels of oil in 6 months. These collectors, the unemployed, and renaissance. early results are certainly promising, but charlatans. Although oil production The Niobrara Formation, one such for each of the more prolific wells, there from the Niobrara strata began early organic-rich shale, is a particularly hot are others that show little or no produc- in the 20th century; the new oil target here in Colorado. While a large tion. How quickly the flow of oil wells in Colorado are causing a land volume of natural gas (>700 billion cubic declines is very important for looking rush and drilling boom in many feet by one estimate) has already been towards future potential of the resource parts of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Resources of New Mexico
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE MAP 20 C 0 ws ° 0 !07 0 R A .a>1,0jo ,, \ I) .-·- '! ·field-· 0 '- ""-. ,.___ .-. ... - ...S ,;;.,,;!i;;";'. - r '- / \ \ '\ \ ( ;,\) ( ;rqaae -< fie sf'. foad1..,,-;, ' -�- ' \) •' _);i<,,,o ' .1/o,v' _. ·-: No•oool ··· :.:c Grauiand, \ ' e�qm� . I '(';.-- r ring�. f ,, ,\� -,, field ..._ a 'I Nase• ,_,,,- � I • ' 'Ji,( ,.,.j_ ··�• \ \ C "' � Kg 1 , . ' -)' -_---7('+--�\ • I � . \ ' - -'-<- - Star lake field M�ra,,. ;_ ,:_;:, F, Uoioo \_ I // "<. l , ' -� _ leld _\!ooin •\ An;,M-1 ' Irr : °';;, .T'· I I .,v1./ - - • \,._ Cr....___ I ...' · ' �· � -·.-:)"1 ' ··-¼, __ ._,. .-·.' · 'I 51 -....__• •• . � £ (.KP. \ !��·· I ., / Mesa 'I • Lok, ' ""' '--!��·!i c<c,,c..,�� \ ,..�- c,,-.1111, f'��n10,. z a:B,anc., \ ' 5ttnl" ,, I. ' ,, 7 �,ild· Bernal n j()\ 2 BernaltH re." / . cwa,�Y/� Ran �- . L J L L / ) lsh!la Pt1et)lo o: / T I' --._, -'0..._Lo,; Lu/li>S A / ' - � I ' I M��Uow ) .-1a11�11e •ro,,�M Bel<rn c[_,___ J.......___,, . t +---____.,,_ " " " '" JI l2 BA; t-1 - r1ovd PQrtales \ J . <.,, . - ,Y � '.,,7 /, r ' . T _.j.,,' I ' t- -,+! I ' - + I' ,I ' I 107° E X [ C 0 Coal resources of New Mexico Scale 1:1,000,000 1996 1 16 inch equals appro�imate!y mi 10 20 3-0 40 Base modified from "Stote of New Mo•ico, 1981 • by 1he New 0 by Gretchen K. Hoffman Me><ico Neu1 Mexico BHrem1 of Mi11e5 and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico Si801 Sro1e Highwoy Depor1ment; "Bosa Mop of New Me,ico, 1979" by the Miles og U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices
    Characterization GEOLOGIC Prepared by ? TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Characterization .............................. 1 1.2.1 Literature Search .... ........................... 1 1.2.2 Core Processing and Description ..................... 2 1.2.3 Reprocessing of Seismic Data ........................ 2 1.2.4 Grain Size Analysis .............................. 2 1.2.5 Geologic Report ................................ 3 1.3 Location and General Setting ...., ........................ 3 1.4 Previous Studies ...................................... 5 2.0 STRATIGRAPHY ....................................... 7 Precambrian ......................................... 2.1 7 2.2 Paleozoic And Mesozoic Sedimentary Section ................ 2.2.1 Fountain Formation (PennsylvanianPermian) ............ 7 2.2.2 Lyons Sandstone Formation (Permian) ................ 7 2.2.3 Lykins Formation (PermianrTriassic) ................. 10 2.2.4 Ralston Creek Formation (Jiurassic) .................. 10 2.2.5 Momson Formation (Jurassic) ...................... 10 2.2.6 Dakota Group (Lower Cretaceous) ................... 10 2.2.7 Benton Shale Formation (Lower/Upper Cretaceous) ....... 11 2.2.8 Niobrara Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 11 2.2.9 Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............. 11 2.2.10 Fox Hills Sandstone Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ....... 12 2.2.1 1 Laramie Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 12 2.2.12
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resource Development of the Mancos Shale in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico
    HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Open-file Report 566 By Shari Kelley, Thomas Engler, Martha Cather, Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, Peggy Johnson, and Kate Zeigler New Mexico Bureau Geology & Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Socorro, New Mexico 87801 November 2014 HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Prepared for the Farmington Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management Shari A. Kelley, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, [email protected] Thomas W. Engler, Petroleum and Chemical Engineering Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Martha Cather, Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, and Peggy Johnson, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Kate Zeigler, Zeigler Geologic Consulting, Albuquerque, NM 87123 1 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah
    Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-E Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of .Indian -L1Jfairs and the Navajo Tribe ;. ~:0 ..J :i.ui._lll{c,/1 II- Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous > Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo I Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and .. .... Hopi Indian Reservations, .. Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah By R. B. O'SULLIVAN, C. A. REPENNING, E. C. BEAUMONT, and H. G. PAGE HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RESERVATIONS, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-E Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Navajo Tribe .I .. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 ~· ·. UN.ITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 76-180659 ·~ For sale by the Sup~rintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1184 CONTENTS Page Page Abst1·act ------------------------------------------ El Upper Cretaceous rocks-Continued Introduction -------------------------------------­ 2 Mesaverde Group-Continued Location and land-net system ------------------ 2 Lower part of the Mesaverde Group in San Present work -------------------------------­ 3 Juan Basin-Continued Previous investigations and nomenclature ------ 5 Crevasse Canyon Formation ---------- E31 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • Sepkoski, J.J. 1992. Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology Rodney Watkins, Editor (Reviewer for this paper was P.M. Sheehan) This publication is priced at $25.00 and may be obtained by writing to the Museum Gift Shop, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Orders must also include $3.00 for shipping and handling ($4.00 for foreign destinations) and must be accompanied by money order or check drawn on U.S. bank. Money orders or checks should be made payable to the Milwaukee Public Museum. Wisconsin residents please add 5% sales tax. In addition, a diskette in ASCII format (DOS) containing the data in this publication is priced at $25.00. Diskettes should be ordered from the Geology Section, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Specify 3Y. inch or 5Y. inch diskette size when ordering. Checks or money orders for diskettes should be made payable to "GeologySection, Milwaukee Public Museum," and fees for shipping and handling included as stated above. Profits support the research effort of the GeologySection. ISBN 0-89326-168-8 ©1992Milwaukee Public Museum Sponsored by Milwaukee County Contents Abstract ....... 1 Introduction.. ... 2 Stratigraphic codes. 8 The Compendium 14 Actinopoda.
    [Show full text]