Colorado's New Oil Boom — the Niobrara

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Colorado's New Oil Boom — the Niobrara Volume 13, Number 1 C OLORADO G EOLOGICAL S URVEY Spring 2011 Colorado’s New Oil Boom — the Niobrara Introduction Note from the Director: Niobrara shale oil is an exciting new by EOG Resources in October 2009 and hydrocarbon prospect for Colorado. produced 50,000 barrels of oil in its first “New oil boom.” Our resource-rich state, while having 90 days. After a year, it is still produc- The words stir developed extensive natural gas reserves ing more than 2,500 barrels of oil per excitement in the over the past couple of decades, is now month. This is significant given that the hearts of landmen, in the process of ‘rediscovering’ its oil average oil well in the U.S. generates just landowners, geol- in organic-rich shale. The current eco- 300 barrels of oil per month. Another ogists, engineers, nomics of fossil fuels, combined with well, the Gemini well drilled by Noble regulators, envi- the development of new drilling and Energy in early 2010, produced over ronmentalists, tax stimulation technologies, is driving this 32,000 barrels of oil in 6 months. These collectors, the unemployed, and renaissance. early results are certainly promising, but charlatans. Although oil production The Niobrara Formation, one such for each of the more prolific wells, there from the Niobrara strata began early organic-rich shale, is a particularly hot are others that show little or no produc- in the 20th century; the new oil target here in Colorado. While a large tion. How quickly the flow of oil wells in Colorado are causing a land volume of natural gas (>700 billion cubic declines is very important for looking rush and drilling boom in many feet by one estimate) has already been towards future potential of the resource parts of the state. produced, it is now Niobrara oil that is as a whole. The application of creative think- the focus of everyone’s attention. Often So what is the Niobrara Formation? ing and technology to these long- mentioned for comparison purposes are Where does it occur in Colorado? Why producing layers of rock named the the Bakken Formation of North Dakota is there excitement about its develop- Niobrara Formation, has raised the or the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas. But, as ment? How might this affect the econ- hopes of thousands of Coloradans. producers are just beginning to ramp up omy and people of Colorado? This Many believe that the Niobrara, and drilling and production, the question of article will address some aspects of these associated formations, might provide how much oil is really available for important questions, providing a back- a sustained drilling and production exploitation over the long term remains ground on the geology, history of devel- boom that is akin to the Bakken- to be answered. opment, and current exploration activity shale, oil boom in North Dakota. One of the first Niobrara horizontal in the Niobrara Formation. Horizontal drilling and formation- wells, known as the Jake well, was drilled stimulation technology are the keys to both plays. Whereas some of the new horizon- Shale Oil (versus Oil Shale) tal wells have reported very high flows Shale oil should not be confused with the perhaps better known “oil shale” of oil, others have not been so pro- found in western Colorado. Shale oil and related shale gas occur in reservoirs ductive. It is still early in the play. The where oil already exists as a liquid in very small openings between grains of potential is large, but widespread suc- rock. Oil shale, on the other hand, is an inorganic rock reservoir containing cess remains to be proven. And, as in no liquid petroleum. It must be heated to high temperatures in order to con- all oil or gas plays, it always gets back vert solid organic material (kerogen) into a liquid or gas hydrocarbon. While to the basic geology of the formations. oil shale in Colorado contains a potentially immense amount of hydrocarbon This RockTalk is an effort to help cit- resources, producing the oil in economically, technologically, and environ- izens, the media, and policy makers mentally feasible ways is still very challenging. Shale oil reservoirs, however, understand what all of the fuss is about. are today being successfully produced in a number of places including several Vince Matthews Colorado basins. The Niobrara Formation is a great example. State Geologist of Colorado CGS ROCKTALK Vol. 13, No. 1 1 Geology Niobrara Distribution The Niobrara Formation was deposited beginning nearly 90 million years ago. At that time, an inland seaway extended from the present-day Gulf of Mexico to the Arctic Ocean (Fig- ure 1) submerging all of what is today Colorado in shallow (<100 feet), to moderately deep (>1500 feet), salt water. For the next six to seven million years, calcareous debris from algae and the remains of abundant marine life living in this seaway slowly accumulated. Additionally, sediment was shed from an ancient mountain range growing to the west in what today would be Utah. When the sea finally withdrew, thick layers of clay, mixed clay and limestone, chalk, and smaller amounts of silt and sand were left behind to form some of the sedimentary rocks we observe today on, and beneath, the surface of Colorado. A geologic cross-section provides a useful tool for visualizing what the basin may have looked like at the end of the seaway’s existence (Figure 2). In places, more than 10,000 vertical feet of sedimentary rock would have accumulated. Studying the rock layers that make-up the Niobrara For- mation helps geologists piece together the climate and envi- ronmental conditions at the time of the inland seaway. From Figure 1. Paleogeographic reconstruction of an inland seaway during the late Cretaceous period (85 million years ago) in North America. Present-day analyses of the limestones, for example, it is thought that Colorado was submerged under salty water. Deposition of limestone, silt, the seaway water was typically warm and the climate tropi- and sand were occurring across most of the state. Green line shows location cal. Further, models have suggested that common water cir- of Figure 2 cross section below. (Map modified from Ron Blakey, Colorado culation patterns involved cooler water flowing south along Plateau Geosystems, Inc.) the western edges of the seaway, while warmer waters flowed SW NE Utah Colorado Kansas and Nebraska Iowa Site of Wasatch Site of Cordilleran Site of Great Plains Mountains and western Front Range edge of Colorado Plateau Fox Hills ss 0 Lewis sh Pierre sh Greenhorn ls Niobrara Fm Dakota ss Vertical scale 5,000 Mancos sh Benton sh in feet 10,000 Aspen sh Fall River ss EXPLANATION Continental deposits Continental deposits Marine shaleLimestone and chalk Boundary between (coarse-grained (fine-grained Lower and Upper piedmont facies) coal-bearing facies) Cretaceous (Adapted from Kauffman, 1977) Figure 2. Regional cross section across area of the inland seaway of the late Cretaceous (see Figure 1 for location). A cross section is like taking a giant cake knife and cutting straight down into the earth. In removing a slice, we would expose what the rock strata beneath the surface look like in the third dimen- sion. This cross section shows the accumulated sediments at about 60 million years ago. Toward the west, the Niobrara Formation is part of the Mancos Shale rocks; in the east it is usually identified as a distinct rock unit. Note that this cross section reconstructs areas that have been eroded by the present-day Rocky Mountains in Colorado. 2 CGS ROCKTALK Vol. 13, No. 1 3 1200 1500 Oil & gas zone 600 WY Organic-rich 1500 source 1200 1500 300300 TThinhin Pierre Shale 40° ThickT 40° NB 0 900909 0 60060 Smoky Hill 38° 38°3 Niobrara Thin ~200’-400’ Member UTT KSK Fort Hays Limestone Member NM TX Codell Sandstone 3 300 600 Figure 4. Total thickness of the Niobrara Formation and its equivalents in feet. Each contour represents 300 feet of thickness. Blue shows thinnest areas of Niobrara deposition. Note that throughout much of central Colo- rado the Niobrara has been eroded away during uplift of the present-day Rocky Mountains. This is shown as gray shaded areas on map. (Modified Dakota from Longman et al., 1998) Group (Figure 3). Today, in the eastern basins of Colorado, deposits Modified from PTTC Niobrara Field Trip Guide, 2010 include chalk (made predominantly from algae-derived car- bonate plates known as coccoliths), carbonate mud, shale, Figure 3. Generalized Niobrara Formation stratigraphy for northeastern and silt. In the western basins, less chalk is present, with Colorado. Shales (gray) usually act as source rock and fractured limestones instead more shale, silt, and sand that was shed from the (blue) act as reservoirs. In places, the limestones can also act as lesser source rocks. In rock units below the Niobrara interval, the sandstones (yellow) can rising mountains to the west. Here the Niobrara is often be good hydrocarbon reservoirs as well. grouped as part of the Mancos Shale Formation. The overall thickness of the Niobrara Formation varies north into the central and eastern portions of the seaway. between 200 and 400 feet in northeastern Colorado (Figure 3 The interaction of these cooler and warmer waters occurred and 4). In northwestern Colorado, however, thicknesses can around the latitude of present day Colorado and Wyoming. be much greater—in places more than 1500 feet (Figure 4). When combined with overall fluctuations of sea level, this The Niobrara Formation was originally deposited over the can explain much about the distribution of different rock entire state and surrounding area (as shown in the Figure 4 types found in the Niobrara Formation today.
Recommended publications
  • Post-Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Northeastern Alaska by R
    Post-Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Northeastern Alaska By R. L. DETTERMAN, H. N. REISER, W. P. BROSGE,and]. T. DUTRO,JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 886 Sedirnentary rocks of Permian to Quaternary age are named, described, and correlated with standard stratigraphic sequences UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Detterman, Robert L. Post-Carboniferous stratigraphy, northeastern Alaska. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 886) Bibliography: p. 45-46. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:886 1. Geology-Alaska. I. Detterman, Robert L. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 886. QE84.N74P67 551.7'6'09798 74-28084 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02687-2 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ 1 Stratigraphy__:_Continued Introduction __________ ----------____ ----------------____ __ 1 Kingak Shale ---------------------------------------- 18 Purpose and scope ----------------------~------------- 1 Ignek Formation (abandoned) -------------------------- 20 Geographic setting ------------------------------------ 1 Okpikruak Formation (geographically restricted) ________ 21 Previous work and acknowledgments ------------------ 1 Kongakut Formation ----------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Mapping Variability of the Niobrara Formation
    UNDERSTANDING AND MAPPING VARIABILITY OF THE NIOBRARA FORMATION ACROSS WATTENBERG FIELD, DENVER BASIN by Nicholas Matthies A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date________________ Signed:____________________________________ Nicholas Matthies Signed:____________________________________ Dr. Stephen A. Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date:_______________ Signed:____________________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Wattenberg Field has been a prolific producer of oil and gas since the 1970s, and a resurgence of activity in recent years in the Niobrara Formation has created the need for a detailed study of this area. This study focuses on mapping regional trends in stratigraphy, structure, and well log properties using digital well logs, 3D seismic data, and core X-ray diffraction data. Across Wattenberg, the Niobrara is divided into the Smoky Hill Member (made up of A Chalk, A Marl, B Chalk, B Marl, C Chalk, C Marl, and Basal Chalk/Marl) and the Fort Hays Limestone Member. Directly beneath the Niobrara, the Codell Sandstone is the uppermost part of the Carlile Formation. Stratigraphic trends in these units are primarily due to differential compaction and compensational sedimentation. The largest structural trend is a paleo-high that runs east-west to northeast-southwest across the middle of the field. It has a relief of about 100 ft, and is 20 mi wide. The A Chalk and A Marl show evidence of submarine erosion over this area. Faults mapped from 3D seismic data are consistent with previously published data on a proposed polygonal fault system in the Denver Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and Adjacent
    Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and AdJa(-erit Parts of the Lewis Sliale and Lance Formation, East Flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, Southwest lo U.S. OEOLOGI AL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1532 Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and Adjacent Parts of the Lewis Shale and Lance Formation, East Flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, Southwest Wyoming By HENRYW. ROEHLER U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1532 Description of three of/lapping barrier shorelines along the western margins of the interior seaway of North America UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roehler, Henry W. Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills sandstone and adjacent parts of the Lewis shale and Lance formation, east flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, southwest Wyoming / by Henry W. Roehler. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1532) Includes bibliographical references. Supt.ofDocs.no.: I19.16:P1532 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cretaceous. 2. Geology Wyoming. 3. Fox Hills Formation. I. Geological Survey (U.S.). II. Title. III. Series. QE688.R64 1993 551.7T09787 dc20 92-36645 CIP For sale by USGS Map Distribution Box 25286, Building 810 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract......................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction................................................................................... 1 Formations exposed on the east flank of the Rock Springs Description and accessibility of the study area ................
    [Show full text]
  • Niobrara Total Petroleum System in the Southwestern Wyoming Province
    Chapter 6 Niobrara Total Petroleum System in the Southwestern Wyoming Province By Thomas M. Finn and Ronald C. Johnson Volume Title Page Chapter 6 of Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah By USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–D U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado: Version 1, 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Manuscript approved for publication May 10, 2005 ISBN= 0-607-99027-9 Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Schmitz, M. D. 2000. Appendix 2: Radioisotopic Ages Used In
    Appendix 2 Radioisotopic ages used in GTS2020 M.D. SCHMITZ 1285 1286 Appendix 2 GTS GTS Sample Locality Lat-Long Lithostratigraphy Age 6 2s 6 2s Age Type 2020 2012 (Ma) analytical total ID ID Period Epoch Age Quaternary À not compiled Neogene À not compiled Pliocene Miocene Paleogene Oligocene Chattian Pg36 biotite-rich layer; PAC- Pieve d’Accinelli section, 43 35040.41vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 42.3 m above base of 26.57 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U B2 northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 29034.16vE section Rupelian Pg35 Pg20 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 145.8 m above base 31.41 0.03 0.04 206Pb/238U 145.8, equivalent to GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section MCA/84-3 Pg34 biotite-rich layer; MCA- Monte Cagnero section (Chattian 43 38047.81vN, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 142.8 m above base 31.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U 142.8 GSSP), northeastern Apennines, Italy 12 28003.83vE of section Eocene Priabonian Pg33 Pg19 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 14.7 m above base of 34.50 0.04 0.05 206Pb/238U 14.7, equivalent to Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section MAS/86-14.7 Italy Pg32 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.9 m above base of 34.68 0.04 0.06 206Pb/238U 12.9 Ancona, northeastern Apennines, 13.6011 E section Italy Pg31 Pg18 biotite-rich layer; MASS- Massignano (Oligocene GSSP), near 43.5328 N, Scaglia Cinerea Fm, 12.7 m above base of 34.72 0.02 0.04 206Pb/238U
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49E55
    Cretaceous Research 69 (2017) 49e55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes High-resolution calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Santonian/Campanian Stage boundary, Western Interior Basin, USA * Zachary A. Kita a, , David K. Watkins a, Bradley B. Sageman b a Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA b Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA article info abstract Article history: The base of the Campanian Stage does not have a ratified Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP); Received 26 June 2016 however, several potential boundary markers have been proposed including the base of the Scaphites leei Received in revised form III ammonite Zone and the base of the paleomagnetic Chron C33r. Calcareous nannofossil assemblages 25 August 2016 from the Smoky Hill Member of the Niobrara Formation in the central Western Interior Seaway, USA Accepted in revised form 28 August 2016 were analyzed from two localities to determine relevant biohorizons and their relationships to these Available online 30 August 2016 potential boundary markers. In a previous study, the Aristocrat Angus 12-8 core (Colorado) was astro- chronologically dated and constrained using macrofossil zonations and radiometric ages. The Smoky Hill Keywords: Calcareous nannofossils Member type area (Kansas) provides an expanded interval with good to excellent nannofossil Biostratigraphy preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Resources of New Mexico
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE MAP 20 C 0 ws ° 0 !07 0 R A .a>1,0jo ,, \ I) .-·- '! ·field-· 0 '- ""-. ,.___ .-. ... - ...S ,;;.,,;!i;;";'. - r '- / \ \ '\ \ ( ;,\) ( ;rqaae -< fie sf'. foad1..,,-;, ' -�- ' \) •' _);i<,,,o ' .1/o,v' _. ·-: No•oool ··· :.:c Grauiand, \ ' e�qm� . I '(';.-- r ring�. f ,, ,\� -,, field ..._ a 'I Nase• ,_,,,- � I • ' 'Ji,( ,.,.j_ ··�• \ \ C "' � Kg 1 , . ' -)' -_---7('+--�\ • I � . \ ' - -'-<- - Star lake field M�ra,,. ;_ ,:_;:, F, Uoioo \_ I // "<. l , ' -� _ leld _\!ooin •\ An;,M-1 ' Irr : °';;, .T'· I I .,v1./ - - • \,._ Cr....___ I ...' · ' �· � -·.-:)"1 ' ··-¼, __ ._,. .-·.' · 'I 51 -....__• •• . � £ (.KP. \ !��·· I ., / Mesa 'I • Lok, ' ""' '--!��·!i c<c,,c..,�� \ ,..�- c,,-.1111, f'��n10,. z a:B,anc., \ ' 5ttnl" ,, I. ' ,, 7 �,ild· Bernal n j()\ 2 BernaltH re." / . cwa,�Y/� Ran �- . L J L L / ) lsh!la Pt1et)lo o: / T I' --._, -'0..._Lo,; Lu/li>S A / ' - � I ' I M��Uow ) .-1a11�11e •ro,,�M Bel<rn c[_,___ J.......___,, . t +---____.,,_ " " " '" JI l2 BA; t-1 - r1ovd PQrtales \ J . <.,, . - ,Y � '.,,7 /, r ' . T _.j.,,' I ' t- -,+! I ' - + I' ,I ' I 107° E X [ C 0 Coal resources of New Mexico Scale 1:1,000,000 1996 1 16 inch equals appro�imate!y mi 10 20 3-0 40 Base modified from "Stote of New Mo•ico, 1981 • by 1he New 0 by Gretchen K. Hoffman Me><ico Neu1 Mexico BHrem1 of Mi11e5 and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico Si801 Sro1e Highwoy Depor1ment; "Bosa Mop of New Me,ico, 1979" by the Miles og U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices
    Characterization GEOLOGIC Prepared by ? TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Characterization .............................. 1 1.2.1 Literature Search .... ........................... 1 1.2.2 Core Processing and Description ..................... 2 1.2.3 Reprocessing of Seismic Data ........................ 2 1.2.4 Grain Size Analysis .............................. 2 1.2.5 Geologic Report ................................ 3 1.3 Location and General Setting ...., ........................ 3 1.4 Previous Studies ...................................... 5 2.0 STRATIGRAPHY ....................................... 7 Precambrian ......................................... 2.1 7 2.2 Paleozoic And Mesozoic Sedimentary Section ................ 2.2.1 Fountain Formation (PennsylvanianPermian) ............ 7 2.2.2 Lyons Sandstone Formation (Permian) ................ 7 2.2.3 Lykins Formation (PermianrTriassic) ................. 10 2.2.4 Ralston Creek Formation (Jiurassic) .................. 10 2.2.5 Momson Formation (Jurassic) ...................... 10 2.2.6 Dakota Group (Lower Cretaceous) ................... 10 2.2.7 Benton Shale Formation (Lower/Upper Cretaceous) ....... 11 2.2.8 Niobrara Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 11 2.2.9 Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............. 11 2.2.10 Fox Hills Sandstone Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ....... 12 2.2.1 1 Laramie Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 12 2.2.12
    [Show full text]
  • Alamosa Creek, Section On, 74 Discussed, 69
    INDEX Alamosa Creek, section on, 74 Dalton (Cont'd.) discussed, 69 lower part (Cont'd.) valley of, described, 62 depositional conditions, 17 Allison barren member of Mesaverde, 11 upper part, 14 Apishapa formation, 20 depositional conditions, 18 Arizona, sections in, 89 Datil formation, 64 Atarque, section near, 60 D-Cross Mountain, section at, 74 discussed, 36 discussed, 69 Atarque member of Mesaverde, 11,13 Deer Creek, section at, 91 age of, 35 Depositional conditions, 15 defined, 35 Detritus, rate of accumulation, 16, 17 Dilco coal member of Mesaverde, 5, 11, 14 Bartlett barren member of Mesaverde, 11 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 Bell Mountain sandstone, 67, 71 north of Chuska Mountains, 28 Bennett Peak, section west of, 51 south of Chuska Mountains, 30 Benton group, subdivisions, 20 Dilco-lower Gibson zone, 67, 70 Black Mesa, section at, 89 Durango, section near, 83 Cabezon, section at, 82 Environmental conditions, 15 Carlile shale, 20 Epicontinental seas, oscillating strandline in, 15 fauna of, 20, 22 Equilibrium, profile of, 17, 19 Carthage, section at, 87 Casa Salazar, section at, 81 Faunal zones, 21 Cebolleta Mesa, section near north end of, 72 at Point Lookout, 26 discussed, 67 in McCarty-Alamosa Creek area, 66 section near south end of, 73 on San Juan River, 27 Cerrillos, section at, 85 Ferron sandstone, 23 Chaco River, section on, 48 "Gallego" sandstone, 67, 70 "Chamiso" formation, 67, 71 Gallina, section at, 82 Chamiso member of Mesaverde, 67, 71 Gallup, section near, 5, 78 Chinle formation, 7, 64 Gallup coal basin, Mesaverde
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resource Development of the Mancos Shale in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico
    HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Open-file Report 566 By Shari Kelley, Thomas Engler, Martha Cather, Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, Peggy Johnson, and Kate Zeigler New Mexico Bureau Geology & Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Socorro, New Mexico 87801 November 2014 HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF OIL AND GAS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO Prepared for the Farmington Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management Shari A. Kelley, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, [email protected] Thomas W. Engler, Petroleum and Chemical Engineering Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Martha Cather, Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Cathryn Pokorny, Cheng-Heng Yang, Ethan Mamer, Gretchen Hoffman, Joe Wilch, and Peggy Johnson, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Kate Zeigler, Zeigler Geologic Consulting, Albuquerque, NM 87123 1 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah
    Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-E Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of .Indian -L1Jfairs and the Navajo Tribe ;. ~:0 ..J :i.ui._lll{c,/1 II- Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous > Rocks and the Tertiary Ojo I Alamo Sandstone, Navajo and .. .... Hopi Indian Reservations, .. Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah By R. B. O'SULLIVAN, C. A. REPENNING, E. C. BEAUMONT, and H. G. PAGE HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RESERVATIONS, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 521-E Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Navajo Tribe .I .. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 ~· ·. UN.ITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 76-180659 ·~ For sale by the Sup~rintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1184 CONTENTS Page Page Abst1·act ------------------------------------------ El Upper Cretaceous rocks-Continued Introduction -------------------------------------­ 2 Mesaverde Group-Continued Location and land-net system ------------------ 2 Lower part of the Mesaverde Group in San Present work -------------------------------­ 3 Juan Basin-Continued Previous investigations and nomenclature ------ 5 Crevasse Canyon Formation ---------- E31 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • Sepkoski, J.J. 1992. Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology Rodney Watkins, Editor (Reviewer for this paper was P.M. Sheehan) This publication is priced at $25.00 and may be obtained by writing to the Museum Gift Shop, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Orders must also include $3.00 for shipping and handling ($4.00 for foreign destinations) and must be accompanied by money order or check drawn on U.S. bank. Money orders or checks should be made payable to the Milwaukee Public Museum. Wisconsin residents please add 5% sales tax. In addition, a diskette in ASCII format (DOS) containing the data in this publication is priced at $25.00. Diskettes should be ordered from the Geology Section, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Specify 3Y. inch or 5Y. inch diskette size when ordering. Checks or money orders for diskettes should be made payable to "GeologySection, Milwaukee Public Museum," and fees for shipping and handling included as stated above. Profits support the research effort of the GeologySection. ISBN 0-89326-168-8 ©1992Milwaukee Public Museum Sponsored by Milwaukee County Contents Abstract ....... 1 Introduction.. ... 2 Stratigraphic codes. 8 The Compendium 14 Actinopoda.
    [Show full text]