The Cult Complex of Bel at Porolissum. a Historical and Architectural Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cult Complex of Bel at Porolissum. a Historical and Architectural Perspective THE CULT COMPLEX OF BEL AT POROLISSUM. A HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVE Coriolan Horațiu Opreanu1, Flaminiu Taloș2 Abstract: In this manuscript, we are reopening the archaeological files of a monument – the Temple of Bel – discovered at Porolissum. We start by presenting the history of the monument research and then analyze the chronology and the construction phases of the temple. A temple of Liber Pater has been proposed to have been built under the Temple of Bel in the 2nd century AD and a Christian Basilica over the temple sometimes in the 4th century. However, we did not find indications of these buildings in the archaeological evidence excavated to this date. Moreover, when we analyzed the only remaining architectural elements (a Corinthian capital with human protome and an ornamented merlon) belonging to this temple, we found striking cultural connections with the religious cults of the Palmyrene community to which, most likely, the temple belonged, along with an adjacent banqueting hall. The two stone elements mentioned above carry marks and symbolic meanings that can be traced to the Oriental civilizations. In addition, votive altars ornated with the Oriental crowsteps motif can be found at Porolissum. We propose that a carving workshop with Oriental masters must have existed at Porolissum that worked for the local Palmyrene community and wove aspects of original sophisticated Palmyra monuments into their work. We finalize this manuscript by proposing a 3D reconstruction of the entire Bel cult complex based on all currently available historical and archeological data and using known ancient architectural principles. Our endeavor sheds a new light on the Palmyrene community and the intertwined lives of Porollisum’s inhabitants during an unprecedented time of social, economical and cultural exchange. Keywords: temple, capital, merlon, architecture, reconstruction History of the research and historical interpretation of the temple of Bel Archaeological explorations and excavations at Porolissum have a relatively recent history. In an report from 12 November 1859 sent to the Greek‑Catholic bishop of Gherla, Ioan Alexi, by the priest Iosif Vaida from Brebi concerning the 13 parishes in the area, mentions the presence in the parish of Moigradu (today Moigrad‑Porolissum) of ruins of the fort, as well as aqueducts and the Roman stone paved road (“Memorabilis ab uno veteris castro, cuius ruinae hodie quoque videntur, a fodinibus calcis, pluribus aquae ductibus Romanorum antiquorum, et via lapidea eorumdem”)3. In the same period C. Torma passed through Porolissum and so did A. Cosma, a teacher from Zalău. Around the same period, texts of many Latin inscriptions from Porolissum were published by the famous German scholar Th. Mommsen in his third volume of Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. In 1907, count D. Teleki conducst a first, one‑day excavation at Porolissum. In 1908, the Society of the Transylvanian Museum (Erdely Nemzeti Muzeum) 1 Institute of Archaeology and Art History, Romanian Academy Cluj Branch, Mihail Kogălniceanu Str. 12‒14, 400084, Cluj‑Napoca, Cluj County, RO; e‑mail: [email protected] 2 Ph.D. Student in Architecture at Architecture and Urbanism Department, Technical University of Cluj‑ Napoca, St. Memorandului 28, 400114, Cluj‑Napoca, RO; e‑mail: [email protected] 3 ARDEVAN 1977;136; MATEI 1077, 209. Ephemeris Napocensis, XXX, 2020, p. 101–136, https://doi.org/10.33993/ephnap.2020.30.101 102 Coriolan Horațiu Opreanu, Flaminiu Taloș starts financing excavations led by A. Buday. Upon the unification of Transylvania with Romania in 1918, more extended archeological research was undertaken 20 years later in 1939‑1940 by the Romanian archaeologist C. Daicoviciu. Interrupted by WWII, the research was reinitiated in 1943 by A. Radnoti during the period when north‑western Transylvania was temporarily occupied by Hungary. After the war, the Romanian Academy started a research program at Porolissum, the first excavation campaigns taking place in 1949 and then in 1958–1959. After another intermission, the last stage of the archaeological research was resumed by the Romanian Academy in 1977 and continues till today.4 The temple of Bel was apparently discovered during the 1938 Daicoviciu excavations when the building inscription was found.5 However, C. Daicoviciu never published this inscription, nor detailed the description of the excavation and plans or drawings. The only known documentation consists of photographs of the inscription, of the Corinthian capital and of a column that were published much later by the last survivor of the Daicoviciu’s team.6 The inscription was presented for the first time in a catalogue of the monuments published by the Sălaj County’s Museum from Zalău.7 Here is the text of the inscription: Pro salute[I]mp(eratoris) M(arci) Aur[eli] | Antonini Aug(usti) Pii Fel(icis) deo | patrio Belo n(umerus) Pal(myrenorum) sagit(tariorum) tem|plum vi ignis consumptum | pecunia sua restituer(unt) dedi|cantf (sic) [C(aio)] [Iul(io) Sept(imio) Casti]no| co(n)s(ulari) III Daci[ar(um) M(arco)?] Ulpio Victore | proc(uratore) Aug(usti) provi[nc(iae) Po]rol(issensis) cura agen|te T(ito) Fl(avio) Saturn[ino (centurione) le]g(ionis) V Mac(edonicae) p(iae) c(onstantis). The excavations from 1958 directed by M. Macrea named the area of the Temple of Bel “the sanctuaries’ terrace”. For the first time, they attributed the vestiges found by C. Daicoviciu in 1939 to a putative “Temple of Liber Pater”.8 Although, not archaeologically identified, this temple was presumed to have existed on the base of a votive inscription found close by during Daicoviciu’s excavation. Daicoviciu does not draw any conclusion on the “Temple”. Rather, this “temple” is inferred from Daicoviciu excavation by the Macrea team and published its presence as a “fact” in the same catalogue of the museum.9 Indeed, two inscriptions were found in the same area, but the evidence on the terrain indicates that only one temple existed. Out of the two inscriptions only one fits the parameters of a “building inscription” and that is for the Temple of Bel. It appears, that the votive altar for Liber Pater was dedicated by a beneficiarius consularis. Such inscriptions were usually linked to a statio of beneficiarii10, which had an annexed holly area, or a shrine, where beneficiarii offered altars to the gods.11 The zone where this votive was found is appropriate, as it is close to the road and to the limes. As a statio of beneficiarii at Porolissum12 is universally accepted by the specialists13, the inscription is, very probable, coming from this building (it is important to mention that this building has not been yet identified) and 4 GUDEA 1989, 35–36. 5 DAICOVICIU 1937–1940, 330, footnote 2. 6 GHERGARIU 1980, 78, Fig. 3/1; 2/1–2. 7 GUDEA/LUCĂCEL 1975, 14, nr. 12. 8 MACREA 1961, 377. 9 GUDEA/LUCĂCEL 1975, 14, nr. 12. 10 The theory belongs to A. v. Domaszewski who based on the only one altar known at his time declared that at Osterburken was a statio of beneficiarii, with 100 years before the discovery of the other 25 altars (DOMASZEWSKI 1902, 205, nr. 344). 11 For example, the statio at Obernburg‑sur‑le‑Main in Germania Superior (STEIDL 2014). 12 For beneficiarii in Dacia see, CUPCEA 2012. 13 NELIS‑CLÉMENT 2000, 164. The Cult Complex of Bel at Porolissum. A Historical and Architectural Perspective 103 not from the presumed Temple of Liber Pater, which is rather unlikely that it had existed on the same “sanctuaries’ terrace“. However, this confusion was largely perpetuated and even amplified in the coming years after Macrea’s attribution. In 1977, when the excavations at Porolissum were resumed, Al. V. Matei’s mission included research at “the sanctuaries’ terrace”. At this moment, he already assumes the existence of two temples.14 He excavated the building “N2”and after finding many tile‑stamps of the numerus Palmyrenorum he decided it was the temple of Bel. The stratigraphy described by Matei identified four phases: the first covering the building with apse from the first half of the nd2 century to the end of the 2nd century, phase II when the temple of Bel was built and soon a landslide followed (?), phase III when the temple was rebuilt at the beginning of the 3rd century (attested by the inscription), phase IV from the end of the 3rd century to beginning of the 4th century when the temple became a Christian basilica (!).15 However, the stratigraphic sequence was not supported by any graphic documentation. In his vision, building “N2” had a different destination in the first phase (before the Temple of Bel) as well as in the fourth one. The interpretation of the fourth phase seems to be the most problematic and likely the result of the official view of Romanian historiography during the communist period, when demonstration of continuity and of the presence of early Christianity was an obsessive propagandistic pattern.16 The last construction phase identified everywhere at Porolissum does not overpass AD 271, the final year of the Roman rule in Dacia. No Early Christian artifact, or any kind of evidence to characterize this building as Christian was found in Matei’s excavation. Three years later, in his next report of excavation, Matei wrote in a footnote that building “N2” was identified as the temple of Liber Pater and later, the temple of Bel was built on top of it.17 No explanation for such an unusual situation has been offered. From this moment on, the monument was known as the temple of Liber Pater which later on became the temple of Bel, an unfounded assumption perpetuated by many different authors. The first author who firmly rejected this speculation was Al. Diaconescu: “…there is no reasonable argument to link this altar or statue base (of Liber Pater) with the first phase of the temple…”.18 There is not any positive evidence for a phase after AD 271.
Recommended publications
  • A Daciai Északi Limes-Szakasz Nyugati Felének Főbb Kutatási Eredményeiről
    Ferenczi István A daciai északi limes-szakasz nyugati felének IĘbb kutatási eredményeirĘl Az 1965—66., 1968—69. és 1984—85. évi terepkutatásaink eredményei megerĘsíteni látszanak egy korábbi nézetet. Eszerint a VeceltĘl (Miciától) északra feltételezhetĘ képzeletbeli római határszakasz nagyjában az Erdélyi Középhegység észak-déli irányú fĘ vízválasztóját követte. Az ettĘl a nem túlságosan kanyargós vonaltól nyugatra fekvĘ földkéreg-szerkezeti (tektonikus) medencékben (a Fehér-Körös-medence KĘrösbányáig nyúló felsĘ, keleti részétĘl eltekintve) pillanatnyilag semmi biztos római erĘdítési, települési nyom (épületmaradvány, feliratos emlék) nem ismeretes. A 60—120 km széles Erdélyi Középhegység hajdanában ĘserdĘk fedte, nyugati szegélyén általában nagyon meredeken fölmagasodó óriás sasbérc (horszt) terjedelmes akadályövezete szükségtelenné tette a római Dacia nyugati végeinek e szakaszon való különösebb megerĘsítését. A .Ęrösbánya—Brád—Abrudbánya—Aranyosbánya—Zalatna környéki aranytermĘ vidék azonban természetesen részét alkotta Dacia provincia középsĘ-nyugati felének. Noha már ezen a tájon is megtettük az elsĘ, puhatolózó lépéseket, e területsáv római kori védelmének kérdése — egyelĘre — továbbra is rejtély számunkra. Kibogozása légi felderítéssel, fényképezéssel összekötendĘ aprólékos terepjárások felderítĘ munkájától remélhetĘ. A. nagyjában a Găina (1486 m), Nagy-Bihar (1848 m) és Vigyázó (1836 m) „hegyvonulaton” végighúzható vonal ez utóbbi lapos tetejétĘl menedékesen északnak ereszkedve a sebesváralji (? RESCVLVM) római tábortól 3—4 km-re
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of Roman Imperialisms
    Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović Reflections of Roman Imperialisms Edited by Marko A. Janković and Vladimir D. Mihajlović This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Marko A. Janković, Vladimir D. Mihajlović and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0625-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0625-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations .................................................................................... vii List of Tables ............................................................................................... x Reflecting Roman Imperialisms .................................................................. 1 Vladimir D. Mihajlović & Marko A. Janković Lost and (re)found? The Biography of Some Apparently Roman Artefacts in Ireland .................................................................................... 30 Michael Ann Bevivino Rural Society on the Edge of Empire: Copper Alloy Vessels in Roman Britain Reported through the Portable Antiquities Scheme ......................
    [Show full text]
  • “Oriental” Cults in Roman Dacia
    Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica XVIII, 2012, 245-279 WOMEN AND «ORIENTAL» CULTS IN ROMAN DACIA JUAN RAMÓN CARBÓ GARCÍA1 Keywords: Women, Dacia, society, religion, oriental cults, Cybele, Isis, Azizos, Deus Aeternus Abstract: An analysis of female religious preferences in the context of the cults of eastern origin is performed on these pages because of the need for specific studies on cults preferred by each social group in the provincial life of Roman Dacia. It should be a contribution to the objective of achieving a better perspective and understanding of the followers of each cult and the general structure of the religious life in the Dacian provinces. Rezumat: Autorul prezintă o analiză a preferinţelor religioase ale femeilor din Dacia romană în contextul cultelor de origine orientală. Articolul se poate dovedi util în perspectiva unei mai bune înţelegeri a practicanţilor fiecărui cult în parte şi a structurii generale a vieţii religioase din provinciile dacice. When researching the spread of different cults, scholars of religion in Roman Dacia have been concentrated especially in making lists of people belonging to each social group that worshipped the same divinity, but with few exceptions it has not been considered which were the gods preferred by each of these social groups. As already noted Schäfer a few years ago, the comparison between the gods preferred by these groups should lead us to check if the members of the provincial and municipal administration, army officers and soldiers, traders and artisans, women or slaves, worshiped or not the same deities. In this way we can achieve a 1 Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Bullard Eva 2013 MA.Pdf
    Marcomannia in the making. by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Eva Bullard 2013 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Marcomannia in the making by Eva Bullard BA, University of Victoria, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee John P. Oleson, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Supervisor Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Department of Greek and Roman Studies Departmental Member During the last stages of the Marcommani Wars in the late second century A.D., Roman literary sources recorded that the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius was planning to annex the Germanic territory of the Marcomannic and Quadic tribes. This work will propose that Marcus Aurelius was going to create a province called Marcomannia. The thesis will be supported by archaeological data originating from excavations in the Roman installation at Mušov, Moravia, Czech Republic. The investigation will examine the history of the non-Roman region beyond the northern Danubian frontier, the character of Roman occupation and creation of other Roman provinces on the Danube, and consult primary sources and modern research on the topic of Roman expansion and empire building during the principate. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Headquarters on the Northern Limes of Dacia: Porolissum (Jud
    CORIOLAN HORAȚIU OPREANU · VLAD-ANDREI LĂZĂRESCU THE ROMAN HEADQUARTERS ON THE NORTHERN LIMES OF DACIA: POROLISSUM (JUD. SĂLAJ / RO) IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT RESEARCH POROLISSUM AND THE NORTH-WESTERN FRONTIER OF ROMAN DACIA The name Porolissum was considered of local origin, having been recorded in several ancient literary and cartographic sources 1 and also in Latin inscriptions found on the site 2. The strategic position of Porolissum (jud. Sălaj / RO) was based on the necessity of blocking and controlling the passage from the Western plain through one of the main natural access routes to inner Transylvania across the Meseş Mountains (fg. 1). Its military importance is also suggested by a high density of defence works consisting of two forts 3, a network of surveillance towers, as well as turf walls and clausura-type stone walls 4. The backbone of this military complex system was represented by the fort on the Pomăt Hill (230 m × 300 m) together with a smaller one situated in its immediate vicinity, on the Citera Hill (101 m × 67 m) 5. The fact that the fort at the Pomăt Hill is oversized, compared to other Roman auxiliary forts, is due not only to the number of attested troops but mainly because it was used as an operational and logistics command centre, as well as for stockpiling supplies. Fig. 1 Map of Roman Dacia. – (Map V.-A. Lăzărescu). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 50 · 2020 225 Fig. 2 Old plan of the latus sinistrum of the fort at Porolissum. – (Compiled after Gudea 1989b, fgs 9. 16-17; graphic illustration V.-A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Porolissum Forum Project: an Archaeological Excavation of a Roman and Gothic City in Northwestern Romania”
    PROPOSAL FOR A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT GRANT FOR RESEARCH : “The Porolissum Forum Project: an archaeological excavation of a Roman and Gothic city in northwestern Romania” Prepared by Dr. Eric C. De Sena ( Adjunct Assistant Professor, Anthropology, Saint Mary’s College Rome Center ) The Porolissum Forum Project is a joint American-Romanian excavation of the forum (civic center) of a Roman city located in northwestern Romania. Archaeological research is conducted for 6 weeks each summer under the direction of Dr. Eric C. De Sena ( Saint Mary’s College ) and Dr. Alexandru V. Matei ( Museum of History and Art, Zalau, Romania ) with a team of about 15 graduate and undergraduate students, primarily from the United States. The principle objectives of the project are to understand the urban topography of the city in the Roman and immediate post-Roman periods (respectively, AD 106-271 and AD 271-376), to elucidate patterns of daily life throughout this period, to determine the relationship between Romans and native European cultures and to promote educational and cultural exchange between Romanian and Western students and scholars. A Saint Mary’s College Faculty Development Grant would assist tremendously with our 2008 summer field season. Background. Porolissum is one of the largest and best-preserved archaeological sites in all of Romania. Located in Sal ăj County, this Roman military center was established on the border of the Roman Empire in AD 106 by the emperor Trajan to defend the main passageway through the Carpathian Mountains into the province of Dacia Porolissensis. After just a few decades, Porolissum evolved into an important commercial center that facilitated trade between the Romans and native European populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 165 Years of Roman Rule on the Left Bank of the Danube. at The
    92 Chapter III PROVINCIA DACIA AUGUSTI: 165 years of Roman rule on the left bank of the Danube. At the beginning of the 2nd century, in the Spring of 101AD, Roman Forces marched against the Kingdom of Decebal. We already know what the Roman's rationale was for starting this war and we also know that the real reason was likely to have been the personal ambition of the first Provincial Emperor, Trajan (he was born in Hispania a man of Macedonian background among Greeks). The Roman armies marched against a client-state of Rome, which was a subordinate ally of Rome. Decebal did not want to wage war against Rome and his recurring peace offers confirm this. It is unlikely that Trajan would only have decided on the total conquest of the Dacian Kingdom after he waged his first campaign in 101-102. After this, Roman garrisons were established in the Province - their ongoing presence is reflected by the Latin names of towns (as recorded by Ptolemy). At Dobreta they begin to build the stone bridge which will span the Danube. It was built in accordance with plans made by Apollodorus of Damascus to promote continuous traffic - it was an accomplishment unmatched - even by Rome. This vast project portends that Trajan began the expedition against Dacia in 101 with the intention of incorporating the Kingdom into the Roman Empire. The Emperor, who founded a city (Nicopolis) to commemorate his victory over Dacia, has embarked on this campaign not only for reasons of personal ambition. The 93 economic situation of the Empire was dismal at the beginning of Trajan's reign; by the end of the second Dacian War it has vastly improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Within and Beyond the Walls A.D. 300-700
    Within and Beyond the Walls A.D. 300-700 edited by Denis Sam.i and Gavin Speed Leicester Archaeology Monograph 17 Debating Urbanisnl Within and Beyond the Walls A.D. 300-700 Proceedings of a coriference held at the Universiry of Leicester, 15th November 2008 Front cover image: Overgrown road at Classe, port of the late antique capital of Ravenna, Italy (© Gavin Speed) Back cover images: The 'Porta Praetoria' at Aosta (© Gabriele Sanlorenzo) . C911apsed Roman building and overlying Anglo-Saxon building, Leicester (© University of Leicester Archaeological Services) © Copyright individual authors 20 I 0 Leicester Archaeology Monograph 17 ISBN 978-0-9560179-2-5 Published by the School of Archaeology & Ancient History, University of Leicester All rights reserved. No part if this publication may IJ{J reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in atry form or by any /!leans, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission Typeset and printed by 4word Ltd, Bristol Debating UrbanisIn. Within and Beyond the Walls A.D. 300-700 Proceedings if a coriference held at the University if Leicester) 15th November 2008 Edited by Denis Sa'lni and Gavin Speed Table of Contents List of Figures IX List of Tables Xlll Preface and Acknowledgements XV List of Contributors XVII Introduction: Debating Urbanism and Change in the XIX Late Roman and Early Medieval World Neil Christie PART 1: WALLS AND TOWN LIFE An Introduction 3 Simon Esmonde-Cleary Chapter I 7 Three Dying Towns: Reflections on the Immediate Post-Roman Phase of Napoca, Potaissa and Porolissum Robert Wanner and Eric C. De Sena Chapter 2 29 'Hoc est civitatis vel potius castri': City-Walls and Urban Status in Northern Italy (circa A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • „Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca Faculty of History and Philosophy
    „Babeş-Bolyai” University, Cluj-Napoca Faculty of History and Philosophy ALIMENTATION IN ROMAN DACIA -ABSTRACT OF THE PHD THESIS- Scientific leader, Phd. Student, Prof. Univ. dr. Mihai Bărbulescu Molnár Melinda-Leila Table of contents Introduction 1.State of research 2.Methodology 3.Sources I. Alimentation of the Romans 1.Literary and Archaeological sources 2.General aspects of alimentation a. Historical background b. The origins of food c. Cooking d. Savours e. Herbs and spices f. Other ingredients g. Tavernae and inns h. Triclinia and ancient dining rooms i. Table settings j. Customs and traditions k. Tableware l. Main dishes m. Peculiarities of the Roman kitchen 3. Recipes II. Food production 1. Cereals a. General aspects of Roman agriculture b. Agriculture in Dacia c. Types of ownership, cultivated fields d. The cultivation of cereals e. The Roman villa rustica f. Villa rustica in Roman Dacia g. Agricultural implements g.1. Agricultural implements in Dacia g.2. Milling h. Storage 2 i. Bread making j. Carpological studies 2. Vegetables and fruits a. Gardens b. Vegetables c. Fruits 3. Viticulture a. Ancient sources b. General aspects of viticulture b.1. Wine in mithology b.2. The philosophy of wine b.3. The origins and expansion of wine b.4. Grapes b.5. Viticulture b.6. Wine production b.7. Types of wine b.8. The use of wine b.9. Viticulture from the economical point of view b.10. Other drinks b.11. Vine and wine in Gaule b.12. Wine in Britain b.13. Wine and viticulture in Pompeii c. Viticulture in Dacia c.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dacia Superior West
    Durham E-Theses The evolution of roman frontier defence systems and fortications the lower danube provinces in the rst and second centuries AD Karavas, John How to cite: Karavas, John (2001) The evolution of roman frontier defence systems and fortications the lower danube provinces in the rst and second centuries AD, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3957/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE EVOLUTION OF ROMAN FRONTIER DEFENCE SYSTEMS AND FORTIFICATIONS IN THE LO\VER DANUBE PROVINCES IN THE FIRST AND SECOND CENTURIES AD Volume II JOHN KARA VAS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • Histoire Rou:\%Ìains Et De La Romanité Orientale Par N
    HISTOIRE ROU:\%ÌAINS ET DE LA ROMANITÉ ORIENTALE PAR N. IORGA PUBLIÉE SOUS LES AUSPICES DE SA MAJESTE LE ROI CHARLES II PAR L'ACADÉMIE ROUMAINE VOL.I,PARTIE II _ LE SCEAU DE ROME BUCAREST x 9 3 7 PARTIE II LE SCEAU DE ROME LIVRE I LES CONQUERANTS CHAPITRE I PREMIER ACTE DE LA ROMANISATION Une nouvelle période dans l'histoire de ce monde, riche en mélanges, qui s'érige peu h peu en grandes synthèses dont se détachera une solide nation millénaire, s'ouvre par l'apparition de ceux qui rendent ainsi la visite, pendant quel- que temps si menafante, de Pyrrhus. La Macédoine n'eftait pas tombée, mais Rome était entrée dans le rae de celle-ci, qui n'était que celui d' Alexandre-le-Grand. Nous avons vu comment la pénétration de Rome dans les Balcans a commencé par les deux guerres d'Illyrie (229-228 et 219 avant J. Chr.), dont nous avons parléplushaut, en rapport avec les races aborigènes dans la Péninsule du Sud-Est Européen. Jusqu'au II-e siècle, Narona, Lissus, Salona, certaines iles avaient, sous le rapport romain, le méme caractère que, plus tard, h l'époque de la domination véni- tienne, ces localités eurent sous le rapport italien 1 Les guerres de Macédoine ont fait connaitre ensuite aux Romains tous les coins des vallées de l'Ouest de la Péninsule Balcanique, pendant la première moitié du II-e siècle. Bientôt, comme autrefois Athénes faisait venir ses servi- teurs de la Thrace 2, comme aujourd'hui les Vénitiens du Frioul ou les Roumains de Bucarest les font venir du pays des Szekler en Transylvanie ou ceux de Jassy de la Bucovine 'Voy.
    [Show full text]
  • Harttimo 1.Pdf
    Beyond the River, under the Eye of Rome Ethnographic Landscapes, Imperial Frontiers, and the Shaping of a Danubian Borderland by Timothy Campbell Hart A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor David S. Potter, Co-Chair Professor Emeritus Raymond H. Van Dam, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Ian David Fielding Professor Christopher John Ratté © Timothy Campbell Hart [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8640-131X For my family ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Developing and writing a dissertation can, at times, seem like a solo battle, but in my case, at least, this was far from the truth. I could not have completed this project without the advice and support of many individuals, most crucially, my dissertation co-chairs David S. Potter, and Raymond Van Dam. Ray saw some glimmer of potential in me and worked to foster it from the moment I arrived at Michigan. I am truly thankful for his support throughout the years and constant advice on both academic and institutional matters. In particular, our conversations about demographics and the movement of people in the ancient world were crucial to the genesis of this project. Throughout the writing process, Ray’s firm encouragement towards clarity of argument and style, while not always what I wanted to hear, have done much to make this a stronger dissertation. David Potter has provided me with a lofty academic model towards which to strive. I admire the breadth and depth of his scholarship; working and teaching with him have shown me much worth emulating.
    [Show full text]