DOCSLIB.ORG

Jacobs Letter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jacobs Letter 1 The Square, Temple Quay 2nd Floor Bristol, BS1 6DG United Kingdom T +44 (0)117 910 2580 F +44 (0)117 910 2581 www.jacobs.com 26 July 2021 Attention: Dan Jones Planning Department South Gloucestershire Council EIA SCREENING OPINION REQUEST UNDER THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS 2017 PROVISION OF CHARFIELD RAILWAY STATION. Dear Mr Jones, This letter is a formal request under Regulation 6 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations) for a Screening Opinion from South Gloucestershire Council (SGC) (as the Local Planning Authority), to determine whether the above-mentioned development constitutes an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development requiring an Environmental Statement (ES). As well as being a formal request, this letter explains why Jacobs, working on behalf of SGC (the Applicant), believes that the development does not require formal EIA under the terms of the EIA Regulations. Consequently, the ‘Station works’ (defined below) are considered permitted development, and what documentation would be required to enable validation of a planning application for the ‘Associated works’ (defined below). To enable SGC to come to an informed Screening Opinion, this letter provides a brief description of the nature and purpose of the proposed development and outlines any potential effects the development may have on the local environment, in accordance with the EIA Regulations. A map showing the location of the proposed Charfield Railway Station is provided on the Location Plan which accompanies this letter (Drawing ref: 673847.CE.56-JC-DR-004). The proposed development is located entirely within the administrative boundary of SGC, on Station Road within the village of Charfield. The Station is proposed to be delivered on the Bristol to Gloucester rail line within the immediate vicinity of the former Charfield Railway Station which was closed in 1965 as part of the Beeching closures. SGC propose to make use of land safeguarded in the South Gloucestershire Local Plan to deliver the new station. The Station will be delivered in collaboration, with Network Rail delivering the rail-side elements including entrances, platforms and footbridge, and SGC delivering the supporting infrastructure including station car park, bus interchange and highway improvements. An Extents Plan has Jacobs U.K. Limited Registered in England and Wales 02594504 Registered Office: 1180 Eskdale Road, Winnersh, Wokingham, RG41 5TU 673847. CE.56.02 been provided to outline the boundary of works to be undertaken by both parties (Drawing ref: 673847CH.CE.56-JC-DR-003). Proposed Development The proposed development presented within this letter involves the development of a new railway station on the Bristol to Gloucester rail line within the village of Charfield, South Gloucestershire. Located at the heart of the village, and within the vicinity of the former Charfield Railway Station, the proposed development will comprise: . Station works to be delivered by Network Rail (on behalf of SGC): Line-side works including the platforms, footbridge and station entrances. Associated works to be delivered by SGC; Highway works including a station car park with larger overflow car park, bus interchange and highway improvements, for which we intend to submit a full planning application. The included General Arrangement Plan (Drawing ref: 673847.CE.56-JC-DR-001) outlines the proposed design for the station and associated works. Charfield Railway Station will provide much-needed access to the rail network for a catchment of up to 14,500 residents within a 5km radius, reducing pressure on the road network in an area which has high levels of car dependency due to limited of alternative transport modes and long journey distances to key employment clusters in the North Fringe and Bristol City Centre. The new station will lie at the heart of the village, presenting a unique opportunity to promote access to the station by walking and cycling, with both existing and proposed new developments in Charfield all located within a 10-minute walk of the Station. The objectives of the proposed development are as follows: . Improve accessibility to the rail network and increase travel choices; . Contribute to reducing congestion on key corridors by facilitating modal shift; . Deliver a more resilient transport network, with shorter and more reliable journey times for commuters, businesses and residents; . Help to meet SGC and West of England Combined Authority’s targets to achieve carbon neutrality by 2030 in response to the Climate Emergency; . Enhance transport links to the Filton Enterprise Area, North Fringe, Yate, Temple Quay Enterprise Zone and Bristol City Centre; . Support wider economic recovery following the coronavirus pandemic, including recovery of rail, through the delivery of rail services to new catchment areas; . Make a positive contribution to social wellbeing, life opportunities and improving quality of life along the affected corridors; and . Protect and where possible enhance local employment opportunities that can be accessed by sustainable travel modes within the village. 673847. CE.56.02 2 Permitted Development As there was previously a station at Charfield in the immediate vicinity of the proposed station, the operational elements of the station (platforms, bridge, lifts and stairs) being delivered by Network Rail are considered to be permitted development and therefore will not require planning permission. The justification for this has been set out in a formal pre-application submission to SGC (14 June 2021. PRE21/0514) alongside the pre-application for the works that we consider to require planning permission. EIA Regulations The EIA Regulations define ‘EIA development’ as either a Schedule 1 development where EIA is always required, or Schedule 2 development where EIA is required when the development is likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location. The purpose of this letter is to provide the information required to determine: . Whether the development falls into either Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations; . If it falls into Schedule 2, whether it is likely to have significant effects on the environment. Information used in this letter has been obtained from internet-based sources, such as the Defra MAGIC website. Reference is also made to the relevant sections of the EIA Regulations. Schedule 1 The thresholds for Schedule 1 development generally relate to major projects that, by virtue of their scale, appearance, or the type of activity, have the potential to impact on the environment. These types of projects are specifically defined in the Regulations and automatically require EIA. The proposed development does not fall under any of the descriptions outlined in Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations, and as such does not automatically require an EIA, and must be considered under Schedule 2. Schedule 2 An EIA is required for Schedule 2 projects only if they are ‘screened in’. A Schedule 2 development requiring EIA is one which is likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size, or location. A development falls under Schedule 2 if it matches one of the categories described in column 1 of the table in Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations, and: a) Any part of that development is to be carried out in a sensitive area; or, b) An applicable threshold or criterion in the corresponding part of Column 2 of that table is respectively exceeded or met in relation to that development. With respect to consideration (a), a ‘sensitive area’ is defined in the EIA Regulations by reference to a list of specific designations that can be applied to areas of land by national or European legislation or by international conventions to which the UK is a signatory. No part of the proposed development is within a sensitive area. 673847. CE.56.02 3 With respect to consideration (b), Schedule 2 provides applicable thresholds and criteria for each of the development descriptions. The development falls under the definition of development under Section 10(b) ‘Urban development projects’ and Section 10(f) ‘Construction of roads’. The Schedule 2 threshold and criteria for consideration 10(b), are: i. ‘The development includes more than 1 hectare of urban development which is not dwelling house development; or ii. the development includes more than 150 dwellings; or iii. the overall area of the development exceeds 5 hectares.’ The Schedule 2 threshold and criteria for consideration 10(f), are: i. The area of the works exceeds 1 hectare. The proposed development would have a total footprint of approximately 2.5 hectares, comprising: . 1.044 hectares - highway works, . 0.243 hectares – station car park, and . 0.922 hectares - overflow car park, . 0.276 hectares – railway works. The total footprint of approximately 2.5 hectares would exceed the Section 10(b) ‘Urban development projects’ applicable “1 hectare” threshold outlined in the EIA Regulations. Planning Practice Guidance (Environmental Impact Assessment, Annex: Indicative screening thresholds) provides further indicative thresholds and criteria for identification of Schedule 2 Development requiring EIA. In relation to 10(b) ‘Urban development projects’, it states that Indicative screening thresholds (below) are “intended to help determine whether significant effects are likely…“. i. “‘area of the scheme is more than 5 hectares; or ii. it would provide a total of more than 10,000 m2 of new commercial floorspace; or iii. the development would have significant urbanising effects in a previously non- urbanised area (e.g. a new development of more than 1,000 dwellings).’’ The approximate 1.044 hectares for highways works exceeds the applicable “1 hectare” threshold for Section 10(f) ‘Construction of roads’. Planning Practice Guidance (Environmental Impact Assessment, Annex: Indicative screening thresholds) States, in relation to 10(f) ‘Construction of roads’, that Indicative screening thresholds (below) are “intended to help determine whether significant effects are likely…“.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Trip Report the Tortworth Inlier Sunday 26Th April 2015. Dave
    Field Trip Report The Tortworth Inlier Sunday 26th April 2015. Dave Green, our group leader, showed us some of the fascinating geology, to the north-east of the city of Bristol. This area is relatively flat but has some undulating topography as it runs into the Vale of Berkeley. It includes the northern part of the once busy Bristol Coalfield. This part of South Gloucestershire is largely rural, dotted with farms, small villages and little townships. It is enclosed by the Mendip Hills to the south, the Cotswold Escarpment to the north and to the east, and the Severn estuary to the west. The area is drained by small streams and rivers like the Frome, whose waters skirt the contours and tumble into the Severn Estuary. Palaeozoic rocks can be found exposed here, while to the east and north east younger Mesozoic rocks overlie them. The geology of South Gloucestershire at first blush appears complex and takes a little unravelling. To begin with; some terminology An inlier is an island of older rock strata, surrounded by younger strata. The Tortworth Inlier comprises Cambrian/Silurian outcrops surrounded by Mesozoic rocks located around Charfield Green, just south of the Little Avon river. It also lies North East of the Carboniferous Coalpit Heath syncline once mined for the bituminous coals it contains. The rock strata we hoped to see Cambrian rocks The oldest strata are the Micklewood beds of upper Cambrian/Lower Ordivician and Tremadoc in age. These are grey micaceous shales with flaggy sandstone or siltstones inbetween. They lie in the southern third of the Tortworth inlier.
    [Show full text]
  • West of England Joint Spatial Plan Publication Document November 2017
    West of England Joint Spatial Plan Publication Document November 2017 Contents Foreword 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 6 Chapter 2: Vision, Critical Issues and Strategic Priorites 8 Chapter 3: Formulating the Spatial Strategy 14 Chapter 4: Policy Framework 18 Chapter 5: Delivery and Implementation 47 www.jointplanningwofe.org.uk 3 MANCHESTER BIRMINGHAM CARDIFF WEST OF ENGLAND LONDON SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE BRISTOL NORTH SOMERSET BATH & NORTH EAST SOMERSET 4 We have to address key economic and social Foreword imbalances within our city region and support The West of England (WoE) currently faces a key inclusive growth. In the WoE, we need to take steps challenge; how to accommodate and deliver to ensure more homes are built of the right type and much needed new homes, jobs and infrastructure mix, and in locations that people and businesses alongside protecting and enhancing our unique need. Businesses should be able to locate where and high quality built and natural environment. It is they can be most efficient and create jobs, enabling this combination that will create viable, healthy and people to live, rent and own homes in places which attractive places. This is key to the ongoing success are accessible to where they work. Transport and of the West of England which contributes to its infrastructure provision needs to be in place up appeal and its high quality of life. front or to keep pace with development to support sustainable growth. Many people feel passionately about where they live and the impact new growth might have on their local The challenges involved and the scale of the issues communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk Westward Now Along This High Ridge and from This Vantage Point, You Can Often Gaze Down Upon Kestrels Who in Turn Are Scouring the Grass for Prey
    This e-book has been laid out so that each walk starts on a left hand-page, to make print- ing the individual walks easier. When viewing on-screen, clicking on a walk below will take you to that walk in the book (pity it can’t take you straight to the start point of the walk itself!) As always, I’d be pleased to hear of any errors in the text or changes to the walks themselves. Happy walking! Walk Page Walks of up to 6 miles 1 East Bristol – Pucklechurch 3 2 North Bristol – The Tortworth Chestnut 5 3 North Bristol – Wetmoor Wood 7 4 West Bristol – Prior’s Wood 9 5 West Bristol – Abbots Leigh 11 6 The Mendips – Charterhouse 13 7 East Bristol – Willsbridge & The Dramway 16 8 Vale of Berkeley – Ham & Stone 19 Walks of 6–8 miles 9 South Bristol – Pensford & Stanton Drew 22 10 Vale of Gloucester – Deerhurst & The Severn Way 25 11 Glamorgan – Castell Coch 28 12 Clevedon – Tickenham Moor 31 13 The Mendips – Ebbor Gorge 33 14 Herefordshire – The Cat’s Back 36 15 The Wye Valley – St. Briavels 38 Walks of 8–10 miles 16 North Somerset – Kewstoke & Woodspring Priory 41 17 Chippenham – Maud Heath’s Causeway 44 18 The Cotswolds – Ozleworth Bottom 47 19 East Mendips – East Somerset Railway 50 20 Forest of Dean – The Essence of the Forest 54 21 The Cotswolds – Chedworth 57 22 The Cotswolds – Westonbirt & The Arboretum 60 23 Bath – The Kennet & Avon Canal 63 24 The Cotswolds – The Thames & Severn Canal 66 25 East Mendips – Mells & Nunney 69 26 Limpley Stoke Valley – Bath to Bradford-on-Avon 73 Middle Hope (walk 16) Walks of over 10 miles 27 Avebury –
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Turnpike Gate, Wickwar, Wotton-Under-Edge
    10 Turnpike Gate, Wickwar, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8ND Detached Modern Home Pleasant outlook over green 4/5 Bedrooms 3 Receptions plus Conservatory Kitchen/Breakfast Room Landscaped Gardens 4 The Old School, High Street, Sherston, SN16 0LH Parking & Double Garage James Pyle Ltd trading as James Pyle & Co. Registered in England & Wales No: 08184953 End of cul-de-sac position Approximately 1,973 sq ft Price Guide: £575,000 ‘Overlooking a peaceful communal green, this detached modern home occupies one of the best positions in this popular residential area of Wickwar just a short walk away from the village centre’ The Property fifth bedroom is currently fitted with a two churches and a coffee shop. The pleasant walking routes around the sauna. The bedrooms all feature built-in village has an excellent sense of surrounding countryside with the nearby This modern detached home occupies one storage and the master bedroom has an en- community and is ideal for families with Little Avon River and Hawkesbury of the best positions within this popular suite shower room in addition to the family the popular Alexander Hosea Primary Common beyond. residential road in the village of Wickwar bathroom. School situated within easy walking at the very far end of the cul-de-sac distance to the property, there is also a pre- Tenure & Services overlooking a peaceful communal green. There is driveway parking for three school, youth club, after-school club and The property is conveniently situated for vehicles plus a double garage which has various baby and toddler groups available. We understand the property is Freehold amenities with High Street and primary power.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingswood Environmental Character Assessment 2014
    Kingswood Environmental Character Assessment October 2014 Produced by the Kingswood VDS & NDP Working Group on behalf of the Community of Kingswood, Gloucestershire Contents Purpose of this Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 1 Location ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Landscape Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Setting & Vistas .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Land Use and Landscape Pattern .................................................................................................................. 5 Waterways ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Landscape Character Type ............................................................................................................................. 8 Colour ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Geology .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Site Strategic Environmental Assessment Site Specific Baseline
    Berkeley Site Strategic Environmental Assessment Site Specific Baseline September 2014 Site Specific Baseline, September 2014 Berkeley Site, Issue 3 Page 1 of 18 FOREWORD This document has been prepared to support the NDA's Strategic Environmental Assessment of its decommissioning strategy for the 10 Magnox Sites. This document contains baseline environmental information and other relevant environmental data. Site Specific Baseline, September 2014 Berkeley Site, Issue 3 Page 2 of 18 STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Site Specific Baseline – September 2014 Berkeley Site Berkeley Gloucestershire GL13 9PA Berkeley Site Berkeley Site (hereafter referred to as the Site) is twin reactor Magnox station undergoing decommissioning, and is located close to the town of Berkeley in the Stroud District of Gloucestershire, South West England. It is situated on the eastern bank of the River Severn, from which it drew cooling water supplies during its operational phase. The site covers an area of 11 hectares (27 including Berkeley Centre).1a The following describes the key dates for the site: Construction of the site commenced in 1957, and electricity was first supplied to the grid in 1962.1 The site ceased electricity generation in 1989 after 27 years of operation.1 Defuelling of the reactors was completed in 1992.1 Additional funds have been made available to Berkeley Site as part of Magnox Optimised Decommissioning Plan (MODP), so certain areas of work have been accelerated to facilitate entry to Care and Maintenance (C&M) by the anticipated date.2 Both of the reactor buildings were put into the Safestore state in 2010.b The Care and Maintenance Preparations (C&MP) phase of the decommissioning process is scheduled to be completed in 2021 at which point the site will enter the Care and Maintenance (C&M) phase.2 Final Site Clearance (FSC) is scheduled to commence at the end of the C&M phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forest of Avon Plan a Tree and Woodland Strategy for the West of England the FOREST of AVON PLAN Acknowledgements
    The Forest of Avon Plan A Tree and Woodland Strategy for the West of England THE FOREST OF AVON PLAN Acknowledgements We would like to thank Avon Wildlife Trust, Bath Trust, Bath and North East Somerset Council, and North East Somerset Council, Bristol City Bristol Avon Catchment Partnership, Bristol Council, Bristol Water, the Forest of Avon Trust, Avon Rivers Trust, Bristol City Council, Bristol North Somerset Council, South Gloucestershire Tree Forum, Bristol Water, Cotswolds AONB, Council, Wessex Water, West of England Environment Agency, Forestry Commission, Combined Authority, and the Woodland Trust for Mendip Hills AONB, National Trust, National their support in resourcing this Strategy. Farmers Union, Natural England, North We would also like to thank the following Somerset Council, South Gloucestershire organisations for their input to and comments Council, Wessex Water, West of England on this Strategy, without whose expertise this Combined Authority and Woodland Trust. would not have been possible: Avon Wildlife While the Information in this document is considered to be correct at the date of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of the Information. 2 A TREE AND WOODLAND STRATEGY FOR THE WEST OF ENGLAND Woods and trees are vital for a healthy, happy society. They lock up carbon to fight climate change; improve our health, wellbeing and education; reduce pollution and flooding, and support people, wildlife and livestock in adapting to climate change in towns and countryside. 3 3 THE FOREST OF AVON PLAN Executive Summary A strong and improving evidence base for the Trees and woodlands are natural environment is developing, including a crucial part of the West the West of England Nature Recovery Network (NRN) and woodland opportunity mapping, and of England’s environment the West of England Joint Green Infrastructure and provide an array of Strategy (JGIS) provides a prospectus for increasing investment in green infrastructure services to our society and within the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Grwalks Gloucestershire
    GRWalks Gloucestershire Available each March, July and November Ramblers’ Walks Visitors are very welcome to come on up to three July to October 2014 walks listed here before deciding whether they wish to join the Ramblers. DOGS Except for Forest of Dean Group (see below) Only Registered Assistance Dogs are allowed. GRWalks combines full walk details of all the nine Cirencester Group Meet at The Waterloo CP - SP 026021 to Ramblers' groups active in Gloucestershire. One of the share transport. For day walks bring a packed lunch unless advantages of becoming a member of the Ramblers is that you otherwise indicated. See the programme at can walk with any group in Britain at any time. www.ramblers.co.uk/programmes/online.php?group=GR01 IMPORTANT LATE CHANGES will be shown on the www.cirencesterramblers.btck.co.uk link for GRWalks Updates on the Walks Page www.gloucestershireramblers.org.uk/grwalks – do check Cleeve Group Walks start at map reference. See www.ramblers.co.uk/programmes/online.php?group=GR05 or ring the leader if you are not on computer - before travelling. www.cleeveramblers.org.uk Online users can click the top links opposite to look at a group's walks. Click on the title of a walk you are interested in Forest of Dean Group These walks start at the map and scroll down to see an interactive map. We hope lots of reference. Walks may have well-behaved dogs with walkers will be able to see this programme uploaded at permission from leader in advance. See the programme at www.gloucestershireramblers.org.uk/grwalks www.ramblers.co.uk/programmes/online.php?group=GR02 www.fodramblers.org.uk If you need a printed copy of GRWalks write to the editor Mike Garner (GRWalks), Southcot, The Headlands, Gloucester Group Meet centrally at one of two sites as Stroud GL5 5PS.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    Preface The South Gloucestershire Landscape Assessment Guidance (1999). Towards the Character Assessment has been produced to concluding stages of the draft report, the support the Council’s criteria-based landscape Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural and other environmental policies in the Local Heritage Landscape Character Assessment Plan and has been adopted as a Supplementary Guidance for England and Scotland (2002) Planning Document (SPD), to help in the became available and was used to inform the implementation of landscape conservation and draft and final report. enhancement policies, in particular L1, but also The initial assessment, carried out by Chris L2, L5, D1 and other environmental policies. It Blandford Associates, involved a desk study to is also intended to provide a framework for review the existing landscape, based on written other environmental initiatives. sources, map based data and previous The Council expects planning applications to assessments and was followed by extensive demonstrate how the Landscape Character field survey work. Assessment has been taken into account in In parallel, community involvement was initiated development proposals. through a Photographic Survey of the The Council’s move away from local landscape Landscapes of South Gloucestershire, which all designations to a criteria based approach to the parishes and non-parished areas of South landscape and other policies, to meet its overall Gloucestershire participated in. The wealth of objective with respect to landscape policy, ‘to information gathered from this wide-ranging conserve and enhance the character, diversity, local involvement was merged with the initial natural beauty and amenity of the landscape of baseline study, firstly by Cooper Partnership South Gloucestershire for its own sake and to and subsequently by South Gloucestershire’s improve degraded areas’, is in line with national Planning and Environment officers, to produce and regional guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Landscape Character Areas in Stroud District
    Assessment of Landscape Character Areas in Stroud District Supplementary annex to the Stroud District Renewable Energy Resources Assessment report Prepared by CSE and LUC for Stroud District Council November 2019 Assessment of Landscape Character Areas 1 in Stroud District Contents Landscape Character Area: Escarpment 3 Landscape Character Area: Escarpment Foot Slopes 7 Landscape Character Area: Frome River Valley 10 Landscape Character Area: Kingswood Vale - North 13 Landscape Character Area: Kingswood Vale - South 16 Landscape Character Area: Little Avon Basin 19 Landscape Character Area: Little Avon Mid-Valley 22 Landscape Character Area: Lowland Plain 25 Landscape Character Area: Lowland Ridges 28 Landscape Character Area: Rolling Valleys 31 Landscape Character Area: Sandstone Ridge 34 Landscape Character Area: Secluded Valleys 37 Landscape Character Area: Severn Vale Grazing Marshland 40 Landscape Character Area: Severn Vale Hillocks 43 Landscape Character Area: Triassic Ridge 46 Landscape Character Area: Wold Tops 49 Landscape Character Area: Wooded Cambrian Ridge 52 Landscape Character Area: Wooded Lowlands 55 Assessment of Landscape Character Areas 2 in Stroud District Landscape Character Area: Escarpment Representative photographs Assessment of Landscape Character Areas 3 in Stroud District Landscape sensitivity assessment Criteria Description Landform and scale • A large scale exposed and elevated scarp slope landform. Outcrops of exposed oolite limestone rock occur in some areas. Elevation varies widely, from 50 metres AOD to almost 300 metres AOD. • The slopes are typically steep, irregular and incised by narrow small stream gullies and coombes. • The escarpment is generally narrow, rarely exceeding a kilometre wide. • Land cover is predominantly of unimproved grassland with areas of scrub and extensive areas of broadleaved woodland.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2012 Price 20P BERKELEY’S ICONIC BOILERS LEAVE for RECYCLING
    ISSUE NUMBER 198 “For and about the people of Berkeley” April 2012 Price 20p BERKELEY’S ICONIC BOILERS LEAVE FOR RECYCLING In a first for a former UK power station, Magnox has announced that, working with Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) and its main contractor Studsvik, it has successfully removed five redundant boilers from its Berkeley site in Gloucestershire. LLWR became involved in the project in its role as the National Low Level Waste (LLW) integrator, and has a suitable Photo courtesy of Simon Bingham established procurement route through the metallic waste treatment framework. After a competitive tendering process LLWR appointed Studsvik as the main contractor for the removal, transport and treatment of the boilers in Sweden, where they will be recycled. Steve McNally, Berkeley Site Director said: “The removal of these boilers is a huge skyline change for the site and is a great achievement for team Berkeley and importantly our customer, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). Working closely with LLWR and Studsvik, we have managed to remove legacy waste from the site instead of leaving it for future generations to manage. This project also has great environmental credentials, as Photo courtesy of John Carter the majority of the metal will be free-released into the market place for reuse.” The boilers, which are 21.3 metres long, five metres wide and 310 tonnes each in weight, were removed whole from site by heavy lifting sub-contractor ALE, who was appointed by Studsvik, using specialist lifting equipment which loaded the boilers on to purpose-built transportation vehicles. The boilers were then transported through Berkeley town centre to Sharpness Docks.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Technical Environmental Statement Summary
    LAND SOUTH OF CHARFIELD Environmental Statement Volume 1 – Non-technical summary July 2020 Land South of Charfield Volume 1: Environmental Statement (June 2020) Non-Technical Summary Land South of Charfield Environmental Statement Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary (June 2020) 1.0 Introduction and Methodology 1.1 This document sets out the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) that has been undertaken to assess the potential impacts of proposals for a residential-led mixed-use development on land to the south of Charfield, hereafter referred to as (‘the Site’). 1.2 This document is a summary in non-technical language of an Environmental Statement (‘ES’) that has been prepared on behalf of CEG and the Charfield Landowners Consortium (‘the Applicant’). 1.3 On the basis that the proposed development represents an urban development project on a site exceeding 5ha and with over 150 dwellings, the proposed development falls within Part 10 (b) of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) (‘the EIA Regulations’). 1.4 The EIA Regulations state that development falling within Schedule 2 is ‘EIA Development’ if it is likely to have significant effects on the environment due to its nature, size or location. It has been agreed with South Gloucestershire Council (‘SGC’) that the proposed development has the potential for significant effects due to the size of the development. As such, the proposed development is considered to be EIA Development. 1.5 This Non-Technical Summary (‘NTS’) considers the likely significant effects arising during the construction and operation of the scheme and the potential cumulative effects that may arise when the impacts of the scheme combine with other relevant nearby development proposals.
    [Show full text]