?"? ? 152 PAGES UNTIL OUR NEXT SIYUM DAF YOMI SUMMARY AUGUST 10TH 2020!!

?? ? ?? ?? ?? If you want to contribute in any way or have any feedback, ? ??? - ?? ????? please email [email protected] IT'S ALL OUT OF ORDER..... not written down but memorized. THANKS TO RUSSEL LEVY M ay we continue to learn more ????? ? and Orders (????? ), and understand both the patterns within and order chosen to further In compiling the ????? ?, Rebbi, Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi generally understand the content! kept to a set of systematized rules in the composition of individual ????? ?, the order of ????? ? inside a ???? ?, and the organization of the ????? ? inside the various ????? . A surprise lies at the PINAT HALACHA beginning of our 7th chapter, with a ??? ? that would serve as an THANKS TO RAV DANI SCHREIBER excellent introduction to our ???? ?. There are 39 categories of Question: I accidentally left the window open overnight on Friday ?????: one who plants, plows, harvests... hits with the hammer, night, and I ended up with a bunch of flies flitting around my and removes item from one domain to another. kitchen while I was preparing Shabbos lunch! I really wanted to swat them away, but I wasn?t sure if I could. Is there any heter? Two questions jump out of the page. Even though most ?????? are only introduced after the 7th chapter, why did Rebbi decide to Answer: One of the prohibited ?????? of ??? is shochait have six chapters that discuss only a subset of ????? of three (slaughtering), which includes taking the life of any animal, or even ??????? Additionally, why were the ????? of hotza?ah split and making a living creature bleed. That being the case, you may not kill discussed in multiple sections of the ???? ?? even an insect. There is a dispute about lice (having to do with the way they reproduce), but otherwise killing even the tiniest insect is The first Tosafot of the ???? ? attributes this question to the Riva, equivalent to killing a large animal. This means you cannot R? Yitzchak Ben Asher HaLevi of Speyer, a student of and the purposely step on an insect or even swat a fly. first Tosafist. The Rambam and give two similar answers. The exception to this is of course cases of pikuach nefesh ? where the animal or insect poses a threat to human life, even if it Carrying items is the most common action performed, and is very just in the vicinity. Animals or insects which aren?t dangerous but easy to transgress. Because it does not seem to require a specific do cause significant physical pain or discomfort should not be killed action (just walking would cause you transgress it), it was put first outright, but they may be trapped. You can cover them with a to emphasize its importance. bowl. If you cannot trap them, you can kill them inconspicuously. The Riva offers a different answer, that helps us understand both In your case, you definitely cannot kill the flies outright, but you this ???? ?, others in Seder M oed, as well as many we skipped in may spray repellent or poison in the general area in order to the previous Seder. Though most mitzvot are actions we must discourage them from spreading and hanging around (39 perform, or must not perform, in an instance in time, others fit into M elachos, p. 892) more general categories that span periods of time. For example, Pesach may start on the night of the 15th of Nissan, but we must do Bedikat Chametz, Biur Chametz, refrain from eating chametz, bring the korban pesach, etc. For Shmitta (as discussed in ??? ? Shvi?it), various ????? start to apply in the sixth year. Therefore, Rebbi decided order these ????? ? chronologically.

In our ??? ? as well, the first perakim deal with the preparation before ??? , what one must avoid doing close to nightfall, and what preparations one must make before ??? commences. Further, the Ran, Rabbeinu Nissim of Gerona who actually was from , explains that the main ???? in the third ??? ? deals with hotza?ah, and Rebbi wanted to ensure we understood the basis of that ???? in the first ??? ?.

Additionally, the formula used, ?two which are four?, as discussed in the ????, is an introduction to other ????? ? as well. Perhaps, it was employed by as a mnenomic device, as the ????? ? were originally ?Torah sh?be?al peh?, Oral Torah that was ? ? S ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 3 A ? ? 1 3 0 1 6 ? 0 3 ? 1 4 6 ? 5 6 7 2 7 ? ? 1 5 ? 1 2 ? 4 5 2 3 6 5 6 ? ? 0 0 4 ? 3 ? ? ? ? 1 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 7 0 ? ? 2 ? ? ? ? ? 2 2 ? ? 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ? ?

? 1 2 2 2 2 ? 2 2 ? 2 2 H ? ? ? 2 2

? ? 2 2 ? ? 2 2 2 ? ? ? ? ? 2 2 ? ? ? 2 2 2 ? 2 ? ? ? 2 2 ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? 2 ? ? 2 ? ?

0 ? ? ? ? 0 0 ? 0 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? 0 0 0 ? 2 2 0 0 0 ? 0 0 S ? 0 0 0 0 8 ? ? ? ? ? 0 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 0 0 ? ? 0 0 ? 0 0 0 ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? 0 0 ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? 0 ? ? 2 ? ? ? 2 2 2 2 2 ? 2 2 2 2 2 ? ? ? ? ? 0 0 2 2 2 ? ? 2 2 2 2 ? ? 2 2 2 ? ? ? A

? ? 2 2 ? 2 2 2

? ? ? 2 2

?

? 2 2 2 2

? ?

? ?

? ? 2 2

? ? ? ? ? ?

?

? 2

2

? ?

? ? ?

? ?

?

? ? ? ? 2 2

?

? ?

? ? ) ? 8 ? ) r

? 3 1

? 3 4 9

? ? ? 1 4 5 9 6

) ? H 6 0 1 4 0 3 0 1 7 ?

)

? ? ? ? ) ) ) 7 0

) 4 5 3

? 3 2 ?

) )

8 9 1 ) ? 4 )

) ) ) ) ? 2 3

?

?

) ) 7 )

5

)

) 1 a 1 6

)

2 3 ) ) 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 )

5 ? 9 8 1 2

1 ? 2 2 1 1 ) ) 1 2 ) 7 )

1 9

2 2 2 9 1 2 ? 1

) )

9

9 3

5

8 3

4 0 ?

) r r r

y y 1 6

v 0 ? 0 1 4 5 3 3 6 l l )

3 6 ) M p p r r 2 1 1 8 y 7 t t 2 8

7 ) v v v 1 n r r c c c 1 n 8 0 g g 3 M 2 5 4 3 ) 0 2 ( a a a p p n 8 b b a a 1 ( 2 ( ) ( n n 9 o 3 n n n 3 1 1 6 ( 1 3 ( 8 ( 3 u u ( ( c c 5 a a e e 1

6 a 2 2 ( 1 8 1 e e e o o o a ( 8 ( 4 U u ( ( p p ( 1 ( ( ( u u J J 5 ( 1 1 a e e 1 e e ( ( 1 ( ( 4 J a a a ( ( J u u (

( 2

S S J 7 ( ( N 1 M M M

( M M 1 J J J

J J Y

O O A A ( F F S S 7 D D D A A 1 N N N M M (

M 3 I

( 1

( 1 (

(

( S

?"? ? ?"? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ? ?"? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ???? 2 | DAF YOMI SUMMARY GADOL OF THE WEEK - RAV PAPPA ??? ?? (C.E. 300 ? 375) THANKS TO AMI ELKUS

There?s only one Amora that we can ten Bar Papas are not all the sons of Rav discuss as we finish ????? ??? ? (M azal Tov! ), Papa, as they did not all live at the same or any ??? ?, and that is Rav Pappa. Rav time and place. Famously the ?son? Rafram Pappa and his ten sons are mentioned in the Bar Papa lived before Rav Papa. Hadran (we?ll be back! ) that we say at the Nevertheless, Rav says the reason conclusion of each ??? ?. for listing the ten sons at the ???? is to prevent forgetfulness. When one reads a Rav Pappa is a 5th generation Amora. A ??? and reviews it, he says that he will ????? of and Abaya. Headed the review it, and also says the mnemonic for, Narash Yeshiva. and the names of, the ten Bar Papas. So why the zechut of being mentioned 3. The Yam Shel Shlomo explains how with his sons at each masechet?s conclusion? "Papa" represents M oshe (who spoke to Well like much in ????, the answers are Hashem ???? ?? ???? - the acronym of complex, and ???? ????. Some reasons: which is ???), and the names of each of the sons symbolize the ?????? ??? ?. 1. Rav Pappa was a worldly, wealthy man (built a successful brewery) who made a 4. There are 10 places in ? "? where huge ???? each time he finished a ???? ?, there is a ??????, and Rav Pappa made and invited his 10 sons as well as many peace by accepting, and trying to reconcile others. He therefore brought glory to Torah, all opinions. As a result, Rav Papa was seen which was "reflected in the scholarly to bring ????? (completion) of the Torah attainments of his sons." So we honor Rav into the world. He therefore merited 10 Pappa and his family by mentioning them at children, and we mention them at the end every ???? . of a ???? ? because a ???? is a time of completion. Till the next one! 2. However, Rav Hai Gaon said that the

TERMINOLOGY TIPS - ???? ??? ??? CONTRIBUTED ANONYMOUSLY

When the ???? introduces a law it often The Ramchal proves this with the following both laws are correct? Or that Rabbi X and asks ????? ??? ???? ?where do these words observation ? let?s take a piece of ???? from Rabbi Y both agree that both laws are come from?? ? the ???? then cites a verse ? Sanhedrin 66b (one of many hundreds of correct? ? Says the Ramchal ? what is going the amateur Talmudist assumes that the ???? examples), The law relating to a Naarah with on here is that both Rabbis have ALL the laws is now going to deduce the law from the Kiddushin who has relations with another in common ? they only disagree as to which verse ? this is INCORRECT (a closer man. verse in the Torah you attach this oral law to examination would tell you that if that were ???? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????? M ost ?????? (every rule has exceptions) in the case ? the connection appears very ? ??? ??? ???? ????? ??? ??? ?? '? ???? the are not meant to be a lesson in fanciful) ? On almost every occasion ? the ????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??? ?? ? logical deduction ? but a matching exercise introduction of the verse is NOT there to ??????? ?? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? from the oral law that is known to the verse deduce/prove the law. ??? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ?? ????? in the Torah that alludes to that law. The The law quoted is known independently ??? ? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ? ??? ??? ???? Rambam reiterates this idea in the Sefer from the oral tradition ? the verse comes Hamitzvot Shoresh 2 Asks the Ramchal ? how is the Talmud so from the Torah ? now comes the exercise of sure that the different laws that the Talmud matching the law that we know to a verse in attributes to these Rabbis during the the Torah. The picture is of a newspaper that exchange are has a headline AND a story after the headline correct? ? Rabbi X explaining the particulars implied by the learns a law from headline . verse A ? Rabbi Y ???? ??? The story/oral laws are 1000s of word long learns the law from (containing hundreds of pieces of verse B ? then Rabbi ???? ? information/laws). X tells us that he ?????? learns a different The headline/verse from the Torah is law from Rabbi Y??s ???? ??? maybe 5-10 words long. verse and Rabbi Y ?????? The trick is to match the pieces of learns a different information/laws to the verse/headline ? THIS law from Rabbi X?s EXERCISE IS NOT DERIVATION FROM A verse. Who says VERSE ? IT IS ASSOCIATION WITH A VERSE We have taken care not to use '? ?? or quote full ????? ?. Accordingly, this sheet does The ?Zichru - Memory Corner? summary has kindly been provided by Zichru (c). For further not need to be placed in shaimos but should be disposed of in a respectful manner. information and to receive daily content from Zichru please visit www.zichru.com ?"? ? ?"? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ?"? ????? "? ???? ?? ??? ??? ? ?????? ? ???? 3 | DAF YOMI SUMMARY

what he experiences and should take the lessons of those ?? ? ???? (Thurs 5 March) Thanks to Onnie Schiffmiller (Hadran www.hadran.org.il) experiences to heart. Later, on 63B there is the teaching of| ????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ? to study with a chavruta. As the M eiri When we teach about private matters, whether it be with our explains, the most effective form of learning is accomplished students or are children, are there boundaries? What should those through learning with a chavruta as together they are capable of boundaries be and how do we reward both modesty and curiosity? analyzing and gaining a deeper understanding of the subject Daf 62 in Brachot addresses these issues through a series of stories matter. Ultimately, we are able to accomplish more jointly than we that sometimes make the reader uncomfortable. Because are as individuals. outhouses were places of taboo, they were also places where students could gain ?? ? ???? (? ?? 7 March) insight into the private Thanks to Alex Drucker practices of their The final ???? of ????? is particularly apt for those learning Daf teachers. Yomi. The ???? brings a ?????? a few times throughout the The daf tells of Rabbi masechet in the name of ???? who says in the name of ? ??? ? ?? in Akiva studying Rabbi the name of ?? ?? ??: ???? ? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ? we should not Yehoshua?s bathroom open our mouths to the satan i.e. verbally acknowledging habits. Though Rabbi something gives it credence and therefore could bring us to harm. I Akiva is criticized by Ben would like to suggest that this may work in both directions; not only Azzai, he responds, ?It is might verbalizing something negative give it some level of reality Torah, and I must learn? allowing the satan to bring it about, but to verbalize something Rav Kahana took this a step further lying under his teacher?s bed to positive might give the satan a tangible goal to work against. gain insight into the teacher?s behavior. As we approach the closing lines of ????? we learn a series of At what point does the student?s desire to understand his or her teaching from ???? ???? ??? starting with teacher become an infringement of that teacher?s privacy. And if the ????? ??? ? ??? ? ???? ????? ??? ,?????? ??? ??? ? ?? ????? ?? Torah is anxious that we learn everyday behaviors from scholars, are ?? ? which is to say that those who try to seize a moment of glory there no red lines? will not reach it, those who do not run after it, will nevertheless be Beyond the world of personal behavior, outhouses were places of given glory. Those who opened their ???? a little over 2 months fear. The daf relates that demons (or perhaps, the modern ago to learn the first Daf of ????? didn?t do so in order to make a equivalent, bacteria) inhabited the outhouse. ?s mother raised siyum on ??? and all of ? ?? but hopefully to learn the first Daf of a lamb to just to accompany him to the privy and Rava?s wife puCtL IinC K ????? and only then the next, and the next, and so on. a nut in a vessel that could be rattled while in the bathroom. The daf HERE The ???? then gives us the teaching of ??? ??? that whoever leaves ends by describing the proper dress etiquette both on Har HaBayit the ?? ?? ??? and goes to the ? ???? ??? will merit to receive the and in synagogues, highlighting that our behavior is always relevant ????? and the Rema (in ?:??? ???? ????) brings this down as ? both to our frame of mind and to the climate it creates for others. Halacha. Rather than making lofty goals to complete all of ? ?? we should our heads down and learn day after day as much as we are ?? ? ???? (Fri 6 March) able. It is with this approach, I would like to suggest, that the ???? Thanks to Jonathan Pelzner then concludes with Talmidei chachamim are ????? ???? ?????. A theme that is expressed throughout the daf is the influence of a We should all be ????? in whatever ???? ????? we can manage. person?s actions as well as the impact of those one surrounds ????? ??? ? ??? ???? himself with. ???? ?? teaches on 63A that a person should teach his son an easy and clean profession so that he will ? ? ?? (Sun 8 March) have time to learn torah. Thanks to Dudy Jacobs Rebbi then teaches that The daf starts by discussing one of the 39 forbidden M elachot, a person should not have the M elacha of Hotza?ah, of transferring. Tosfot explains how too many people in his transferring objects from one place to another is a forbidden task, house as he will different from all the other M elachot as Tosfot points out its a ultimately come to ?M elacha Gerua?, an inferior transgression. Why is this melacha quarrel with some of inferior in comparison to all other forbidden M elachot? them and that having The give 2 interpretations. The first is based on the fact these types of guests in that transferring is the only M elacha that is permissible in some the house will have an impact on the atmosphere within the house. areas but forbidden in others. For example, while it is forbidden to That lesson of Rebbi is immediately followed by another teaching write anywhere on , it is permissible to carry within one?s of Rebbi who states that anyone who sees a sotah will be influenced house even though carrying outside is forbidden. This differing rule by that experience and take a lesson to avoid wine and will on the same item is unique and that's why the halacha calls it ultimately become a nazir. The connection of these 2 teachings of inferior. In fact some could argue the restriction since transferring Rebbi is that in both a person is impacted by those around him and and carrying is acceptable indoors. The second basis for inferiority is

We have taken care not to use '? ?? or quote full ????? ?. Accordingly, this sheet does Daily Daf images kindly provided by Style·A·Daf. - Rabbi Natan Farber. Receive Style A Daf through WhatsApp (email [email protected]) or from their not need to be placed in shaimos but should be disposed of in a respectful manner. website www.style-a-daf.com. Also check https://www.yutorah.org/search/?teacher=83216 RashiDaf for every Rashi on the daf! ?"? ? ?"? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ? ?????? ? ???? ?"? ???? ?? ???? ??? ? ??????? 4 | DAF YOMI SUMMARY

that this M elacha of transferring or carrying is the only M elacha that is not creating or changing. All other forbidden M elachot either are creating or changing. For example cooking or writing are used to create. Tosfot said that this is why the M asechet starts off with the laws of carrying on Shabbat (although its actually the last melacha). It is to show one how important and how serious it is.There are 2 forms of carrying on Shabbat. ?Hotza?ah? and ?Hachnasa?. Hotza?ah means taking something out, meaning from a private domain into a public domain. And ?Hachnasa? means bringing something in, meaning from a public domain to a private domain. Both are forbidden. The Ramban explains that M oshe told Am Yisrael on Shabbat not to bring any more donations for the M ishkan, and they stopped bringing. They listened and followed the decree as written in the Torah not to perform any more work, which in this case meant transferring from the private domain to the public domain. So we clearly learn from the Torah that this is a M elacha and it is forbidden on Shabbat.What about transferring from the public transgression and that carrying a load is not comparable to the cases domain to the private domain? The Pasuk did not write about that. brought in the M ishna, as the body of an individual is considered at So the Gemara has a simple logic, and says there is no difference in rest whereas the hand of an individual is not. Rashi comments that bringing in or out, and bottom line is that there is transference. So the import of the mobility of one?s hand means that there cannot be therefore, it is forbidden on Shabbat to carry from the private an effective ???? or ?????. By contrast, Tosfot holds that the status domain to the public domain, or public domain to the private of the hand follows that of its owner?s body, i.e. if the individual is in domain. ???? ?? ??? ?? ????? ???? ??? ? ?????? motion, so is the hand. We can understand this ?????? in one of two ways: ? ? ?? (Mon 9 March) Thanks to David Gross 1. While the object is resting on the person, we view it as having been uprooted from the ground, and similarly when the person Understanding the nature of finishes their motion, it is considered to be placed on the ground. ?? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? As we deepen our understanding of ?????, it is important to understand the 2. The object really rests on the person and we are concerned with the motion that moves the location of the object from domain to domain. Shabbat Daf 4 catches us in midst of a discussion that will eventually delineate the precise laws of moving objects from one Reshut to another on Shabbat. The Gemara continues discussing intention vs. inadvertence and and what qualifies this act for stoning or Chatat obligation. The Gemara focuses on Rav Bivi?s query regarding a person who places dough in an oven on Shabbat which then is in the process of baking. In this context, the Gemara questions whether another person could peel the dough off the oven (a lesser prohibition) in order to protect the original person from violating a biblical ordinance. The conclusion is that only in a case of Pikuch Nefesh may one desecrate Shabbat by committing a Rabbinic prohibition, even if it means a fellow Jew will be in violation. This passage is suggestive of our responsibilities to one another and the risks we are able to take to help each other. The daf continues with the qualifications of throwing an object from one underlying themes and opinions. When we approach Daf ?, we are private domain to another. These include the height of the object in the midst of understanding what is the scope of the prohibition of during its traverse -10 tefachim (~80 cm); and its final resting place - ????? and its definition. wider or narrower than 4 tefachim(~32 cm) The gemara then In order to elucidate, the ???? relates a question Rav asked from addresses some fundamental questions of space when it comes to Rebbi regarding a case whether an individual might carry an object hotsaa: is airspace considered equal to resting place (R'Akiva); do we learn from handing over (moshit) to throwing (zorek) (R'Akiva)? And finally, is a tree branch measured by the domain where the ? ? ?? (Tues 10 March) branch is or by the trunk it rests upon? Naomi Pugatsch (Hadran www.hadran.org.il)

from one domain to another and whether the movement of person?s body could be considered like the ??uprooting? of an object. Rebbi responds that such an action would constitute a Shabbat We have taken care not to use '? ?? or quote full ????? ?. Accordingly, this sheet does Daily Daf images kindly provided by Style·A·Daf. - Rabbi Natan Farber. Receive Style A Daf through WhatsApp (email [email protected]) or from their not need to be placed in shaimos but should be disposed of in a respectful manner. website www.style-a-daf.com. Also check https://www.yutorah.org/search/?teacher=83216 RashiDaf for every Rashi on the daf!