View Case Study Sudan Red Sea Impact and Cost

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View Case Study Sudan Red Sea Impact and Cost Impact and Cost Benefit Analysis A Case Study of Disaster Risk Reduction Programming In Red Sea State Sudan, 2009 Hisham Khogali, Independent Consultant Derej Zewdu Food Security Officer, Ethiopian Red Cross Society 1 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Background ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1The Sudan ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2Red Sea State .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The Sudanese Red Crescent .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 The Study ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1Selection of Study Areas ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Definition of the project scenario......................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Programme Descriptions ........................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Programme Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Constraints on programme implementation ................................................................................................... 10 4.0 Impact and Cost Benefit Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Food Security/Livelihoods .................................................................................................................................. 11 4.1.1.Terrace Construction, Al Manaar, Derudeib .......................................................................................... 11 4.1.2. Earth Dam/Embankment Lashob ............................................................................................................ 12 4.1.3.Communal Vegetable Garden, Hamisiet ................................................................................................ 13 4.2 Water ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1 Hafir Construction , Delai ........................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.2 Sub-surface water dam, Tomsha ............................................................................................................. 15 4.2.3 Hand pumps and protected wells, Al Garada ........................................................................................ 15 4.3 Women’s Centres ................................................................................................................................................. 16 4.3.1 Women’s Centre Sanganai, Haya ............................................................................................................ 16 4.4 Health ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.4.1 Hospital, Duredeib Town ............................................................................................................................ 18 4.5 Education................................................................................................................................................................ 19 4.5.1 Duredeib Town ............................................................................................................................................. 19 4.5.2 Haya Locality ................................................................................................................................................. 19 5.0 Resilience and Safety Indicators............................................................................................................................ 20 5.1 Indicators to Determine Resilience ................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 Categorizing community based indicators into Global Indicators for monitoring ................................... 22 6.0 Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.1 Programming ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.2 Cost Benefit Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 23 7.0 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................................. 25 References ......................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Annex 1.Terms of Reference: Impact and cost-benefit analysis of the Sudanese Red Crescent Society’s Greater Sinkat Community Development Projects ................................................................................................... 28 Annex 2. List of People Interviewed ............................................................................................................................. 32 Annex 3. Cost Benefit Analysis tables for Interventions .......................................................................................... 35 2 Executive Summary Red Sea State in Sudan suffers regular droughts which have resulted in increased vulnerability of the indigenous nomadic Beja pastoralist community. Activities that were once coping strategies have become part of normal regular patterns of activity despite the fact that they are of an unsustainable nature. The Norwegian and Danish Red Cross have supported the Sudanese Red Crescent Society, for over twenty years, to undertake longer term programming that aims to reduce the vulnerability of the Beja population to recurrent droughts and protect, where possible, the assets that communities have in order to build resilience to disasters. With this support the Sudanese Red Crescent Society has been programming in five sectors: · Food Security/livelihoods · Health · Water · Education · Women’s Development The Sudanese Red Crescent adopted an integrated, multi-sectoral approach to programming providing inputs in different sectors to the same communities over an extended period of time. This study: i. Examined the impact of the interventions undertaken ii. attempted to undertake a cost benefit analysis to determine whether the interventions undertaken were economically efficient. iii. determined community based indicators of resilience by engaging with communities. The Programmes It was evident from discussions with communities and local Governments that the programmes implemented had considerable impacts on the targeted population. Examples such as the terraces and earthdams/embankments enabled households to undertake successful agricultural activities, providing both food for consumption and the possibility to diversify diets as well as the possibility to sell produce and earn an income. This was particularly the case in the example of the terracing in Al Manar where the intervention was targeted to internally displaced people that would otherwise have been destitute due to loss of livestock. Furthermore, cost benefit analysis indicated that these projects were economically efficient with a benefit to cost ratio of greater than 2:1. Water interventions such as the installation of hand-pumps and the construction of hafirs have also impacted positively on pastoral communities. In Delai, the construction of the hafir may have prevented potential conflict, as well as improved an otherwise precarious water supply for nomadic pastoralists. Cost benefit analysis also indicated that the project was economically efficient with a benefit to cost ratio exceeding 2:1. Perhaps the two most important interventions supported by the SRCS were the education inputs and women’s centers. The impact of the education support is being realized through increased attendance at pre-school1, while other activities such as classroom construction have facilitated primary and secondary education by providing enhanced learning environments which in turn has improved
Recommended publications
  • Rapid Assessment Report the Impact of Drought in Red Sea State, Sudan
    Rapid Assessment Report On The impact of Drought in Red Sea State, Sudan 6 April 2018 Early Warning Early Action (EWEA) Initiative, FAO Sudan Rapid Assessment on the impact of drought in Red Sea State Early Warning Early Action (EWEA) Initiative, FAO Sudan Contents Page Acronyms and abbreviations ................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 3 1. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 5 3. ASSESSED AREAs ........................................................................................................................ 5 4. OBJECTIVE .................................................................................................................................... 6 5. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 6 6. LIVELIHOOD PROFILE AND POPULATION ................................................................................. 7 7. RAINFALL AND KHOR BARAKA FLOODING ............................................................................... 8 8. LIVESTOCK ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbons Potential and Resources in Sudan
    UNCTAD 17th Africa OILGASMINE, Khartoum, 23-26 November 2015 Extractive Industries and Sustainable Job Creation Hydrocarbons potential and resources in Sudan By Mr. Ahmed Gibreel Ahmed El-Amain Section Head G&G Studies, Ministry of Petroleum and Gas, Sudan The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD. Republic of Sudan Ministry of Petroleum & Gas Oil Exploration and Production Authority (OEPA) By Ahmed Gibreel 1 of 20 Outlines Objectives. Introduction. Summary. Hydrocarbon Potentiality. Sudanese Basins Subdivisions. Key Basins overview. Resources. Conclusions. Forward Plan. 2 of 20 Objectives To highlight : Sudan Hydrocarbon potentiality. Sudan Resources. 3 of 20 Introduction First Oil Export1999 Red Sea Salima Basin Basin Misaha Basin Um Agaga Basin Mourdi Basin Khartoum & Atbara basins Wadi Hawar Basin Gadarif Basin Muglad Rawat Blue Nile Basin Basin Basin 4 of 20 Summary Sudan is considered one of the top most African hydrocarbon potential countries. Nearly twenty hydrocarbon basins do exist: o Late Proterozoic-Paleozoic continental sag basins (Misaha, Murdi, Wadi Hawar and Salima). o Mesozoic-Cenozoic rift basins (Muglad, Rawat, Khartoum, Blue Nile and Red sea ). Most of the Sudanese basins is by far highly under explored due to data scarcity and others logistical constrains. Proven petroleum system in the Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic. 5 of 20 Summary Sudanese basins could be classified into: o Producing (1 basin ). o Early exploration stage basins: Have proven petroleum systems with some discoveries ( 5 basins: Rawat, Red Sea, Blue Nile, Um Agaga and Khartoum basins). Have proven petroleum systems but no notable discoveries yet been made e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response
    SUDAN COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response 11 October 2020 CONFIRMED CASES by state NO. OF ACTIVITIES by Organization as of 11 October 2020 13,691 International boundary IOM 912 State boundary UNHCR 234 Confirmed cases Undetermined boundary Save the children 193 Abyei PCA Area Red Sea ECDO 150 385 UNFPA 135 Number of confirmed cases RIVER RED SEA 836 6,764 NILE Plan International Sudan 39 Welthungerhilfe (WHH) 34 Deaths Recovered 391 438 WHO 23 NORTHERN HOPE 22 HIGHLIGHTS 146 NCA 20 9,841 The Federal Ministry of Health identified the first case of COVID-19 on 12 March WVI 19 OXFAM 12 2020. United Nations organisations and their partners created a Corona Virus 228 NADA Alazhar 12 Country Preparedness and Response Plan (CPRP) to support the Government. EMERGENCY NGO Sudan 12 NORTH DARFUR KHARTOUM On 14 March 2020, the Government approved measures to prevent the spread of KASSALA EMERGENCY 12 Khartoum the virus which included reducing congestion in workplaces, closing schools 1,137 TGH 11 By Organization Type: NORTH KORDOFAN and banning large public gatherings. From 8 July 2020, the Government started AL GEZIRA World Vision Sudan 11 GEDAREF NORWEGIAN 9 174 7 WEST REFUGEE COUNCIL to ease the lock-down in Khartoum State. The nationwide curfew was changed 203 (9.33%) (0.38%) DARFUR WHITE 274 Italian Agency 7 from 6:00 pm to 5:00 am and bridges in the capital were re-opened. Travelling Development Co. NGO Governmental 34 NILE 243 Near East Foundation 7 between Khartoum and other states is still not allowed and airports will 191 SENNAR CAFOD 6 CENTRAL WEST gradually open pending further instructions from the Civil Aviation Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) - 2006-2008 Version
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) - 2006-2008 version - 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . DD MM YY A. S. M. Khalil, E. A. Elhag and A. D. Elhag C/O: Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources (HCENR). P.O. Box 10488 Khartoum Designation date Site Reference Number Tel:++249 183 784279 Fax: ++ 249 183 787617 e-mail: hcenr@sudan mail.net, [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed: 15 th January 2009 3. Country: Sudan 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Suakin-Gulf of Agig 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: This RIS is for (tick one box only) : a) Designation of a new Ramsar site ; or b) Updated information on an existing Ramsar site 6. For RIS updates only, changes to the site since its designation or earlier update: Not applicable 7. Map of site: a) A map of the site, with clearly delineated boundaries, is included as: i) a hard copy : ; ii ) an electronic format ; iii) a GIS file providing geo-referenced site boundary vectors and attribute tables . b) Describe briefly the type of boundary delineation applied: The boundary follows the Suakin Archipelago where most of the biodiversity is found, and includes both a proposed marine protected area and the surrounding beaches. This area is the most important for conservation purposes, and also concentrates important nesting and fishing areas (El Hag,A.E.1978). 8. Geographical coordinates : From 18° 00' N to 19° 07' N and 37° 20' E to 38° 50' E 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence in Eastern Sudan - Kassala and Red Sea - Flash Update No
    SUDAN SUDAN: Violence in Eastern Sudan - Kassala and Red Sea - Flash Update No. 2 Last updated: 27 Aug 2020 FLASH UPDATE (27 Aug 2020) SUDAN: Violence in Eastern Sudan - Kassala and Red Sea - Flash Update No. 2 HIGHLIGHT S Recent intercommunal clashes in different localities of Kassala and Red Sea states have driven displacement, and caused loss of lives and damages to houses, markets and other key infrastructure. The tensions between members of different tribes led the Kassala’s Government to declare a State of Emergency, restricting all movements. In Red Sea, the restrictions of movements imposed on 10 August continue, with a curfew from 2000 to 1800 hours. The violence and the movement restrictions pose significant challenges to humanitarians to assist people affected, including the newly displaced families. SIT UAT ION OVERVIEW Tensions have increased over the past few days in Kassala State and could escalate into more violence, following intercommunal clashes reported in the region over the appointment of the new civilian Wali (Governor) on 22 July. Fighting has reportedly left around 15 people dead, according to media reports, although the Government confirmed two deaths, as of 26 August. A State of Emergency was declared from 26 to 28 August, restricting all movements, including of humanitarian workers. Security forces have been deployed to prevent further violence, according to media reports. Despite the restrictions, a protest was organized today 27 August, reportedly against the nomination of the Governor. Videos and pictures posted on social media and carried by local news outlets show large groups of people arriving in the State’s capital city from Kassala Rural locality.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugees from South Sudan As of 31 July 2020
    SUDAN: KHARTOUM POPULATION DASHBOARD Refugees from South Sudan as of 31 July 2020 Total number of refugees¹ 283,832 BY DATA SOURCE POPULATION DISTRIBUTION UNHCR/COR² registered refugees 84,518 IPP³ registered and/or unregistered 199,314 Total arrivals in 2020 - Total arrivals in July 2020 - 1 Government sources estimate the number of South Sudanese refugees in Sudan to be higher; however, data requires verification. Biometric registration (30%) Out-of-camp registered with UNHCR/COR (30%) 2 Commission for Refugees IPP Registered & Unregistered (70%) Out-of-camp - IPP registered & unregistered (70%) 3 Immigration and Passport Police AGE-GENDER BREAKDOWN⁴ SCHOOL- AGED REPRODUCTIVE- HOUSEHOLD CHILDREN (6-17 YRS)⁴ AGED WOMEN/GIRLS DISTRIBUTION⁴ (13-49 YRS)⁴ Age (years) Male Female 0-4 6% -20 6% 20 5-11 10% 10% 19% 33% 28% 12-17 7% 8% 18-59 22% 25% 60+ 3% 3% Primary ‘6-13 yrs’ (23%) Women-headed (19%) 4 Population distribution statistics are based on biometrically registered individuals only Secondary ‘14-17 yrs’ (10%) 101 KARRARI 7,752 717 KHARTOUM NORTH (BAHRI) UM BADA Nivasha 2,749 Al-Takamol 12,190 John Madit 191 Hy Baraka Block 3 Hy Baraka Block 4 7,251 EGYPT 58 Angola 3,447 1,163 LIBYA RED SEA 508 Red Sea 82 Northern 4,706 SHARG AN NEEL 1,920 19,104 River Nile KHARTOUM CHAD North Darfur 7606 Khartoum Kassala 122 North Kordofan Aj Jazirah 2,895 603 Gedaref West Darfur White Nile West Sennar 63 Central Darfur Kordofan KHARTOUM Blue Nile South Kordofan South Darfur East Darfur ETHIOPIA 3,054 Abyei 14,126 PCA SOUTH SUDAN 2,586 UM DURMAN 1,422 6,468 12,328 JEBEL AWLIA NORTHERN NORTH KORDOFAN 9,676 NILE 2,885 UM BADA 1,558 AL GEZIRA KARRARI KHARTOUM NORTH (BAHRI) Bantiu LEGEND KHARTOUM SHARG AN NEEL 12,242 KHARTOUM UNHCR Oce UM DURMAN JEBEL AWLIA Open Areas GEDAREF Dar El Selam 8 Dar El Selam 7 Undetermined Boundary 1,696 3,464 AJ JAZIRAH State Boundary WHITE NILE Locality Boundary 5KM The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply ocial endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Sustainable Future for the Red Sea Coast of Sudan Part 2: Socio Economic and Governance Survey
    Toward a Sustainable Future for the Red Sea Coast of Sudan Part 2: Socio Economic and Governance Survey 1 2 Toward a Sustainable Future for the Red Sea Coast of Sudan Part 2: Socio Economic and Governance Survey This program would have not be possible without the generous financial support of the European Commission and IWC Schaffhausen. 3 CREDITS Consortium of partners: The Red Sea State of Sudan and related institutions (HCENR, ICZM Office, Red Sea University) Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA) The United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Afrikan Parks Conservation (APC) Coastal Oceans Research and Development in the Indian Ocean (CORDIO) The Centre for Environment and Development for the Arab Region and Europe (CEDARE) The Centre for Environment and Development for the Arab Region and Europe (CEDARE) Sudanese Development Initiative - SUDIA Mallinson Architects Editors: Tarik Chekchak Authors: Mr. Tarik Chekchak, Equipe Cousteau, Director for Sciences & Environment Ms. Khulood Tubaishat, PERSGA, Advisor on Policy and Coastal Governance Dr. Melita Samoilys, CORDIO, Director, Marine Biologist Mr. Roy Facey, Equipe Cousteau, External Consultant Mr. Nedal Aloral, Equipe Cousteau, External Consultant Ms. Raphaëlle Martinez, UNESCO Division of Education Strategies and Capacity Building, Education Planning Specialist of the Section for Education Support Strategies Mr. Ahmed Hanafi Abdel-Magid, Sudia, Consultant, in charge of updating the 2007/8 survey Dr. Rebecca Klaus, Equipe Cousteau, Consultant & Advisor, Marine Biologist and GIS Dr. Jeremy Kemp, Equipe Cousteau, External Consultant, Marine Biologist Ms. Lauren Salm, PERSGA and Equipe Cousteau, UNESCO World Marine Heritage assessment Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA, RED SEA, and NILE RIVER Previous Science Focus! Articles Have Discussed a Particular Phenomenon That Is Visible in Seawifs Data and Imagery
    SCIENCE FOCUS: ETHIOPIA, RED SEA, AND NILE RIVER Previous Science Focus! articles have discussed a particular phenomenon that is visible in SeaWiFS data and imagery. In this case, however, SeaWiFS has provided superb views of a distant region of the world that has many unique geological and physical features. Furthermore, this region of Africa has both archaeological and anthropological significance. Hominid fossils found here indicate that this region may be the origin of humanity's presence on Earth, and the Nile River valley and delta are the home of numerous archaeological sites from the time of the Pharaohs. The SeaWiFS image below is centered on Ethiopia. The sites that are labeled will be discussed on the following pages. The image without labels appears on page 4. Starting at the top right, the capital city of Sudan, Khartoum, is located at the convergence of the Blue Nile and the White Nile. Although the Blue Nile is much shorter than the White Nile, it contributes about 80% of the flow of the river. Moving west, the Dahlak Archipelago is seen off the Red Sea coast of Eritrea. Because of their isolation, the numerous coral reefs of the Dahlak Archipelago are some of the most pristine remaining in the world. Portions of the Dahlak Archipelago are in the Dahlak Marine National Park. Directly south of the Dahlak Archipelago, in the inhospitable desert region of the Afar Triangle and the Danakil Depression, is the active shield volcano Erta Ale. The summit crater of Erta Ale holds an active lava lake. South of Erta Ale, the terminal delta of the Awash River can be seen.
    [Show full text]
  • SUDAN Rural Livelihood Profiles for Eastern, Central, and Northern Sudan January 2015
    SUDAN Rural Livelihood Profiles for Eastern, Central, and Northern Sudan January 2015 MAP OF LIVELIHOOD ZONES IN SUDAN FEWS NET Washington FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity. The content of this report does not [email protected] necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International www.fews.net Development or the United States government. i SUDAN Livelihood Profiles January 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Map of Livelihood Zones in Sudan ................................................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................................... v Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... v A Summary of the Household Economy Approach ...................................................................................................................... 1 The Household Economy Approach in Sudan .............................................................................................................................. 2 Overview of Rural livelihoods in Eastern, Central, and Northern Sudan ..................................................................................... 4 Northern Riverine Small‐scale Cultivation (Zone 1) ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inaccessible Health Facilities in Darfur Map Ref.:2014-0002
    WHO-HISU-SUDAN Inaccessible Health Facilities in Darfur Map Ref.:2014-0002 El Malha Boba(BHU) ! Um Buru Gasimba(BHU) Chad ! Karnoi(PHCC) Kornoi Kamu(BHU) ! ! El Tina Hilaliya(BHU) ! Miski(BHU) ! Ed El Kheir(BHU) ! Kutum Kulbus North Darfur Abu Gamra(BHU) ! Mellit Hashaba(PHCC) ! El Kuma Jebel Moon El Sireaf El Naim(BHU) Sirba ! Umjarwa Asani(BHU) ! El Fasher West Darfur Kebkabiya Melesah(BHU) Korgol(BHU) Saraf Om!ra ! Tina South(BHU) !Tina West(BHU) Umm Keddada !Tawilla !Koshiny North(BHU) Nobo(BHU) Mali(BHU) ! !Khezan Tonjur(BHU) Kereinik ! Rokoro Finga(BHU) Tukumare(BHU) Taibon(B!HU)!Daia!(BHU)! ! El Geneina Samonga(BHU) !!!Solow(BHU) ! Bouri(BHU) Dar El Salam ! ! Klaimendo Um Haraz(BHU) !!Kerbi(BHU) Mara(BH!U) ! Zalingei ! ! Kroun(BH!U)Tagal(BHU) Martagalo(BHU)Baringo(BHU) ! Beida Azum Nertiti Sharq Jabel Marra Urukum(PHCC) Habila ! Marshang Niteaga Alwehda Um Shugeira(BHU) Kass ! Wadi Salih Sheiria El Taweisha Art!u(BHU) Central Darfur ! Abu dangal(BHU) Foro Baranga Shattai Labado(PHCC)Labado(BHU) Nyala North ! Nyala Bielel Ailliet Kubuk(PHCC) Angabu(BHU) ! ! !Almatawrat(BHU) Bindisi Alnayra(BHU) Mukjar Kubum Yassin Kelekle west(BHU) ! ! Ed El Fursan ! !Altaalba(BHU) El Salam Ed Daein Alkhitma(BHU) Wadjoda(Mob_clinic) ! ! Umelkhairat(BHU) Abu Karinka Adila ! Um Boim(BHU) Daralsalam(BHU)Hilal!(BHU) ! Keleikle mugu(BHU) ! ! ! Um Rak!uba(BHU) Sharif(BHU) Assalaya ! Al Gura(BH!U) Um totahana(BHU) Egypt South Darfur ! Umm Dukhun Gerida Libya Saudi Arabia Red Sea Tullus Northern Red Sea Rahad El Berdi East Darfur Nile Katayla Dimsu Chad
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Chronic Livelihoods Vulnerability in Red Sea State, Sudan
    hpg Humanitarian Policy Group Addressing chronic livelihoods vulnerability in Red Sea State, Sudan Mustafa Babiker, University of Khartoum Sara Pantuliano, Overseas Development Institute A report prepared for Oxfam GB February 2006 This paper was written by Dr. Mustafa Babiker and Dr. Sara Pantuliano. The views expressed in the text and its recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Oxfam GB. The authors take responsibility for any errors contained in the document. 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank many people who supported us in completing this study and from whom we derived an enormous amount of assistance. First of all, we would like to thank the entire Oxfam team in Red Sea State (Port Sudan/Tokar) and in Khartoum who extended all kinds of support and assistance in completing this study. Thanks in particular go to George Were, Program Coordinator, Oxfam Red Sea State, for his overall support in terms of staff and logistics and for his comments on the report. Abdel Gadir Farag, Oxfam Rural Port Sudan Programme Coordinator, deserves special mention for the time and energy he invested (formally and informally) in supporting every aspect of the study. We would like to extend our appreciation to Abu Amna Hashim, who was instrumental in facilitating meetings and consultation with the senior officials at time when these were very busy reorganizing themselves and various state departments in the wake of the formation of the first government in the Red Sea State after the conclusion of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. We would also like to thank the Beja Club for the invitation to attend the useful presentations made by the Director of Health and the Director of Education on the Red Sea State 2006 Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan Response
    ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS FOR THE SUDAN RESPONSE Last Updated: 06/05/20 200 mi * Final sovereignty status of Abyei COUNTRYWIDE L I B YA 200 km E G Y P T area pending negotiations between South Sudan and Sudan. FAO iMMAP DARFUR-WIDE IOM CRS Red OCHA IOM UNDP S A U D I UNDP Sea UNDSSA R A B I A UNICEF UNICEF UNMAS WFP WFP WHO NORTHERN UNICEF Port Sudan RED SEA GOAL WFP Dongola IOM UNHAS RI UNHCR UNICEF SCF RIVER CRS NILE Ed Damer CHAD ERITREAPROGRAM KEY Concern USAID/OFDA USAID/FFP IOM State/PRM IMC NORTH SCF Agriculture and Food Security TGH DARFUR KHARTOUM GEZIRA Economic Recovery and Market Khartoum Systems War Child Canada Kassala ARC Education WRI CARE KASSALA Food Vouchers CRS NORTH Wad Medani IOM KORDOFAN Health GEDAREF WEST World Vision Humanitarian Air Service El Fasher Gedaref DARFUR CRS Humanitarian Coordination and Information Management El Obeid Singa El Geneina Rabak Humanitarian Policy, Studies, Analysis, or Applications WHITE SENNAR Zalingei NILE Livelihoods WEST CENTRAL Nyala Local, Regional, and International DARFUR KORDOFAN Procurement Ed Damazin CRS El Fula Logistics and Relief Commodities SOUTH Ed Daein SOUTH ETHIOPIA IMC DARFUR Multipurpose Cash Assistance KORDOFAN BLUE IOM NILE Multi-Sector Assistance EAST Kadugli DARFUR NEF Nutrition Norwegian Church Aid Abyei ADRA Protection SCF Area- C .A.R. IMC Rapid Response Fund SOUTH Disputed* SUDAN TGH IRW Risk Management, Policy Concern Mercy Corps and Practice UNMAS ARC Mercy Corps RI Shelter and Settlements ABYEI AREA GOAL NEF VSF/G CARE World Vision UNMAS U.S. In-Kind Food Aid IOM IMC SCF WRI IMC CRS VSF/G Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene UNDP IOM UNMAS CRS IOM World Vision The boundaries and names used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the U.S.
    [Show full text]