GLOBE THEATER in ODESSA, TEXAS Major Professor Minor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Shakespeare's Elizabethan Public
University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1-1925 Shakespeare's Elizabethan public. Joseph Anderson Burns University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Burns, Joseph Anderson, "Shakespeare's Elizabethan public." (1925). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 182. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/182 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SHAKESPEARE'S ELIZABETHAN PUBLIC A Dissertation SUbm! tted to the Faculty Of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of English By Joseph Anderson Burns 1925. 7 Of all the arts drama is the most democratic. Other forms of artistic and aesthebic expression, literature, music, painting, may be cultivated in solitude. not so the drama. It is demanded by the public; produced for the public nd unless it is ~pproved by the public ito doom is certain. r/hy it; is that the drama can- not at any time break away from the .t.."as ...• es, prejudices, and ide 1 of the public for which it s written, M. Edelstand Du · eril has 1. -
Download Download
Early Theatre 9.2 Issues in Review Lucy Munro, Anne Lancashire, John Astington, and Marta Straznicky Popular Theatre and the Red Bull Governing the Pen to the Capacity of the Stage: Reading the Red Bull and Clerkenwell In his introduction to Early Theatre’s Issues in Review segment ‘Reading the Elizabethan Acting Companies’, published in 2001, Scott McMillin called for an approach to the study of early modern drama which takes theatre companies as ‘the organizing units of dramatic production’. Such an approach will, he suggests, entail reading plays ‘more fully than we have been trained to do, taking them not as authorial texts but as performed texts, seeing them as collaborative endeavours which involve the writers and dozens of other theatre people, and placing the staged plays in a social network to which both the players and audiences – perhaps even the playwrights – belonged’.1 We present here a variation on this approach: three essays that focus on the Red Bull theatre and its Clerkenwell locality. Rather than focusing on individual companies, we take the playhouse and location as our organising principle. Nonetheless, we are dealing with precisely the kind of decentring activity that McMillin had in mind, examining early drama through collaborative performance, through performance styles and audience taste, and through the presentation of a theatrical repertory in print. Each essay deals with a different ‘social network’: Anne Lancashire re-examines the evidence for the London Clerkenwell play, a multi-day biblical play performed by clerks in the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries; John Astington takes a look at acting traditions and repertory composition at the Red Bull and its fellow in the northern suburbs, Golden Lane’s Fortune playhouse; and Marta Straznicky looks at questions relating to the audience for Red Bull plays in the playhouse and the print-shop. -
1 Working with Lost Plays: “2 Fortune's Tennis” and the Admiral's Men
Working with lost plays: “2 Fortune’s Tennis” and the Admiral’s men David McInnis This chapter has a dual purpose: first, to revisit the most neglected of backstage plots (the plot commonly referred to as “2 Fortune’s Tennis”) and ask new questions about the information it provides; and second, to offer this inquiry as a case study of the methodology, aims and limitations of working with lost plays. “2 Fortune’s Tennis” has been dismissed by W. W. Greg and others as the “the most fragmentary of all the plots,” and for this reason remains the least studied of such documents.1 The title itself is a best-guess reconstruction: it appears in severely mutilated form (with substantial lacunae) as “The [plot of the sec]ond part of fortun[e’s tenn]is”.2 The precise date of the plot is uncertain (ca. 1597-1602), but scholars are confident in attributing it to the Admiral’s men, either at the Rose or the Fortune. On the rare occasion that this plot is discussed, scholarship focuses on questions of casting, on biographical information pertaining to the actors it names, and on the date and provenance of the document itself. The desire of some critics to associate the plot with an independently known play title like “Fortunatus” or “The Set at Tennis” has caused further confusion.3 Yet much of the clearest evidence that this plot contains— the names of characters in the play—has been ignored. This chapter focuses on the characters named in the plot, and asks questions concerning company commerce and repertorial strategy. -
3D Computer Modelling the Rose Playhouse Phase I (1587- 1591) and Phase II (1591-1606)
3D Computer Modelling The Rose Playhouse Phase I (1587- 1591) and Phase II (1591-1606) *** Research Document Compiled by Dr Roger Clegg Computer Model created by Dr Eric Tatham, Mixed Reality Ltd. 1 BLANK PAGE 2 Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….………………….………………6-7 Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9-10 1. Introduction……………………..………...……………………………………………………….............………....11-15 2. The plot of land 2.1 The plot………………………………………………..………………………….………….……….……..…17-19 2.2 Sewer and boundary ditches……………………………………………….……………….………….19-23 3. The Rose playhouse, Phase I (1587-1591) 3.1 Bridges and main entrance……………………..……………………………………,.……………….25-26 3.2 Exterior decoration 3.2.1 The sign of the Rose…………………………………………………………………………27-28 3.2.2 Timber frame…………………………………………………..………………………………28-31 3.3. Walls…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32-33 3.3.1 Outer walls………………………………………………………….…………………………..34-36 3.3.2 Windows……………………………………………………………..…………...……………..37-38 3.3.3 Inner walls………………………………………………………………………………………39-40 3.4 Timber superstructure…………………………………………….……….…………….…….………..40-42 3.4.1 The Galleries………………………………………………..…………………….……………42-47 3.4.2 Jutties……………………………………………………………...….…………………………..48-50 3.5 The yard………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….50-51 3.5.1 Relative heights………………………………………………...……………...……………..51-57 3.5.2. Main entrance to the playhouse……………………………………………………….58-61 3.6. ‘Ingressus’, or entrance into the lower gallery…………………………..……….……………62-65 3.7 Stairways……………………………………………………………………………………………………....66-71 -
A Brief History by WILL SWALES Welcome
a brief history BY WILL SWALES welcome Welcome to a brief history of The White Hart Royal, Moreton-in-Marsh, Gloucestershire. During the late spring and early summer of 2016 we had the good fortune to be able to revitalise and refurbish one of our fabulous sister inns, The King’s Head in Richmond, North Yorkshire. During the planning stage of this project we started to look hard at the building and its many historical attributes, at how some parts of the building had been added during its 300 years of existence. And whilst contemplating the small changes and additions we wanted to make, it dawned on me that we will only be its custodians for a generation or two at most. I can’t foretell who will follow but started thinking about who had been its keepers in the past. Therefore, we asked a good friend if he would research The King’s Head and try to separate the fact from the fable; what’s true and what has been elaborated during the storytelling process over the years. Will Swales made such a good job of The King’s Head that we then asked him to complete the same task for The White Hart Royal Hotel. What follows is that research. We think it’s as accurate as can be, but naturally there are many gaps and we would welcome any additional information. I hope you enjoy this small booklet and the hospitality and service we provide within The White Hart Royal Hotel. We are now busy researching the other inns we own and operate within our group and hope that eventually we will have all our inns within one publication, but until then please feel free to take this copy with you. -
Theater and Neighborhood in Shakespeare's
ENGLISH 8720: Theater and Neighborhood in Shakespeare’s London Spring Semester 2013 Professor Christopher Highley Classroom: Scott Lab N0044 Class time: Fri 11:10-2:05 Office: Denney 558; 292-1833 Office Hours: Wed 10-2 and by appointment [email protected] Class Description: This class will examine the different theatrical neighborhoods of Early Modern London in which the plays of Shakespeare and his contemporaries were performed. We will pay special attention to three neighborhoods: Southwark, on the south-bank of the River Thames, was home to the Globe, the Rose, and several other ampitheaters; Blackfriars, an ex-monastic Liberty inside the walls of the City, was home to indoor theaters; and Clerkenwell, northwest of the City, was the location of the Fortune and Red Bull playhouses. When and for what reasons was playing first attracted to these areas? What political, economic, demographic, and social conditions allowed playing to survive here? What local neighborhood pressures shaped the identity and fortunes of these venues? Did the location of a playhouse determine the composition of its audience and thus the kinds of plays performed? Did playwrights build awareness of the playhouse neighborhood into their plays? We will read representative plays from each of the theaters we study (for exxmple, Jonson's The Alchemist, and Beaumont’s Knight of the Burning Pestle for the Blackfriars), but we will also devote much of our attention to the social and theatrical documents that reveal how theaters functioned within specific neighborhoods. We will look at the documents of royal, metropolitan, and ecclesiastical authorities, along with petitions of neighborhood residents, contemporary accounts of playgoing, and anti-theatrical tracts. -
White Hart Inn Ref No: 3218
White Hart Inn Ref No: 3218 Fore Street, North Tawton, Devon, EX20 2DT Delightful & Deceptively Large West Devon Freehouse Close to Centre of the Historic Market Town of North Tawton Several Character Trade Areas & Pretty Trade Garden Two Bedroom Owners Accommodation Free of Tie, Wet Led Business with Potential to Increase Food Trade £19,950 Leasehold White Hart Inn Fore Street, North Tawton, Devon, EX20 2DT LOCATION The White Hart is located in Fore Street close to the centre of North Tawton which is an ancient town steeped in history and can be found in the Doomsday Book. The area is surrounded by beautiful countryside and located right in the centre of the County of Devon, between the national parks of Dartmoor and Exmoor. North Tawton is easily accessed from the A30 Devon/Cornwall link road and is situated approximately 7 miles east of Okehampton, 10 miles West of Crediton and approximately half an hour drive from the County town of Exeter. North Tawton is a thriving town today and has become something of a centre for light industry with significant employers including Gregory Distribution, Taw Valley Creamery and Vital Pet Products. DESCRIPTION The White Hart is an attractive and deceptively large terrace building extended to the rear. With rendered walls under a slate roof the pub offers a mix of traditional finishes with a stylish, modern feel. The property has been tastefully arranged as 3 trading areas which are cleverly interlinked with an open kitchen and bar servery. There is a spacious owners flat on the first floor with two bedrooms, kitchen, lounge and bathroom. -
A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement
A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics Table of Contents Dating Shakespeare’s Plays 3 Life in Shakespeare’s England 4 Elizabethan Theatre 8 Working in Elizabethan England 14 This Sceptered Isle 16 One Big Happy Family Tree 20 Sir John Falstaff and Tavern Culture 21 Battle of the Henries 24 Playing Nine Men’s Morris 30 FUNDING FOR A NOISE WITHIN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IS PROVIDED IN paRT BY: The Ahmanson Foundation, Alliance for the Advancement of Arts Education, Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, Employees Community Fund of Boeing California, The Capital Group Companies, Citigroup Foundation, Disney Worldwide Outreach, Doukas Family Foundation, Ellingsen Family Foundation, The Herb Alpert Foundation, The Green Foundation, Kiwanis Club of Glendale, Lockheed Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County Arts Commission, B.C. McCabe Foundation, Metropolitan Associates, National Endowment for the Arts, The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, The Steinmetz Foundation, Dwight Stuart Youth Foundation, Waterman Foundation, Zeigler Family Foundation. 2 A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement Dating Shakespeare’s Plays Establishing an exact date for the Plays of Shakespeare. She theorized that authorship of Shakespeare’s plays is a very Shakespeare (a “stupid, ignorant, third- difficult task. It is impossible to pin down rate play actor”) could not have written the exact order, because there are no the plays attributed to him. The Victorians records giving details of the first production. were suspicious that a middle-class actor Many of the plays were performed years could ever be England’s greatest poet as before they were first published. -
THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/97, Ff. 53-4 1 ______
THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/97, ff. 53-4 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the will, dated 17 November 1600 and proved 16 January 1601, of Oxford’s servant and officer, Nicholas Bleake. For a debt of £54 6s 2d acknowledged by Oxford to Nicholas Bleake in the schedule of debts attached to Oxford’s indenture of 30 January 1575, see ERO D/DRg 2/25. For Oxford’s lease of a cottage at Castle Hedingham to Nicholas Bleake on 1 April 1580, see Lancashire Record Office DDK/1404/20. For the fine in the Court of Common Pleas dated 18 November 1584 by which clear title to a messuage and other property in Sible Hedingham and Gosfield passed from Oxford to Nicholas Bleake, see TNA CP 25/2/132/1695/26/7ELIZIMICH, Item 41. For a recognizance in the amount of £400 acknowledged by Oxford to Nicholas Bleake on 16 November 1584 in connection with that sale, see TNA C 54/1196, Part 23. For Nicholas Bleake’s deposition sworn 23 April 1594 in Oxford’s lawsuit against Roger Harlakenden for fraud in the sale of Colne Priory, in which he is described as ‘Nicholas Bleake of Ware in the county of Hertford, yeoman, of the age of 53 years or thereabouts’, see TNA C 24/239/46. For Nicholas Bleake’s deposition sworn 1 February 1599 in a lawsuit brought by Judith Ruswell against Oxford in which he is described as ‘Nicholas Bleake of Ware in the county of Hertfordshire, yeoman, of the age of 57 years or thereabouts’, see TNA C 24/269, Part 1, No. -
Theresa Ostrom
“AND HE HONOURED ÞAT HIT HADE EUERMORE AFTER”: THE INFLUENCE OF RICHARD II’S LIVERY SYSTEM ON SIR GAWAIN AND THE GREEN KNIGHT By THERESA OSTROM A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………..iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….....1 2 SIGNS AND KINGSHIP IN RICHARD’S EARLY YEARS…………………........14 The Loss of a Slipper and the Finding of the Holy Oil........................………....14 Signs, Seals, and Livery………………………………………………………...23 3 THE WHITE HART BADGE AND THE CONTROL OF SIGNS………………...27 Early Attempts at Livery……………………………………………………….32 The Badge of the White Hart and the Wilton Diptych………………………....36 4 THE LIVERY SYSTEM AND THE CONCEPT OF TRAWÞE…………................49 The Concept of Trawþe in Chaucer’s and Gower’s Works………………........50 The Green Knight as Arbitrary Sign…………………………………………...59 5 THE PENTANGLE AND THE GREEN GIRDLE………………………...............65 6 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………......88 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………....................97 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH………………………………………………………….104 ii Abstract of Master’s Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts “AND HE HONOURED ÞAT HIT HADE EUERMORE AFTER”: THE INFLUENCE OF RICHARD II’S LIVERY SYSTEM ON SIR GAWAIN AND THE GREEN KNIGHT By Theresa Ostrom May 2003 Chair: R. Allen Shoaf Major Department: English This study investigated the relationship between King Richard II’s manipulations of semiotics and the appearance of signs in the fourteenth-century text, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Many critics have noted that the Gawain-poet presents conflicting responses to signs in the poem; I argue that these contradictory messages may be directly linked to the program of kingship under Richard II. -
Selected Contemporary Allusions
Appendix A Selected Contemporary Allusions 1. Robert Greene, Groats- Worth of Witte ( 1592). Quoted and discussed above, pp. 1-6, 53-4. See also Appendix B. 2. Henry Chettle, Kind-Harts Dreame (1592; SR 8 Dec. 1592), from the Epistle, 'To the Gentlemen Readers'. Discussed pp. 7, 21. he that offendes being forst, is more excusable than the wilfull faultie ... lie shew reason for my present writing, and after proceed to sue for pardon. About three moneths since died M. Robert Greene, leauing many papers in sundry Booke sellers hands, among other his Groats worth of wit, in which a letter written to diuers play-makers, is offensiuely by one or two of them taken, and because on the dead they cannot be auenged, they wilfully forge in their conceites a liuing Author: and after tossing it two and fro, no remedy, but it must light on me. How I haue all the time of my conuersing in printing hindred the bitter inueying against schollers, it hath been very well knowne, and how in that I dealt I can sufficiently prooue. With neither of them that take offence was I acquainted, and with one of them I care not if I neuer be: The other (i.e. Shakespeare], whome at that time I did not so much spare, as since I wish I had, for that as I haue moderated the heate of liuing writers, and might haue vsde my owne discretion (especially in such a case) the Author beeing dead, that I did not, I am as sory, as if the originall fault had beene my fault, because my selfe haue seene his demeanor no !esse ciuill than he exelent in the qualitie he professes: Besides, diuers of worship haue reported, his vprightnes of dealing, which argues his honesty, and his facetious grace in writting, that aprooues his Art. -
At the Court-House, at the City of Exeter, and County of the Same City, On
310 rn Softer, Win?, and Spirituous Liquors, both in the Tow Sarah Atkins, Widow, late of Dartmouth, Devonshire, out of and County of Newcastle-upon-Tyne. business, formerly Ironmonger (sued as Sarah Atkins, Ex- Bartholomew Covvell, formerly of Charlotte-Street, Nort Sliields, Northumberland, afterwards of Low-Street, Sout! Shields, Durham, and afterwards of Bell-Street, Nortl Shields aforesaid, Cooper and Publican, and lately residinj Baker and Grocer. at furnished lodgings in Newgate-Street, in the Town ani Thomas Williams, formerly of Heavitree, Devon, Plumbery County of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Cooper. Painter, and Glazier, afterwards of Union-Street, Friar- Anthony Dagg, formerly of the Wall Knoll, In Newcastle Street, Bhickfriars-Road, Surrey, Labourer, and late of upon-Tyne, and carrying on the business of a Grocer at thi Exmouth, Devonshire, Plumber, Painter, and Glazier. Ouseburn, near Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumberland John Wiuln., formerly of Bishops Teignton, then of East and also the Quay-Side, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Linen Teignmoiitli, then of Dawlish, then of West Teignmonth, Draper, and late of the Wall Knoll, in Newcastle-npon and late of Dawlish, all in Devonshire, Captain in the Royal Tjme, Labourer. Nary. Elizabeth Hay, late of Dean-Street, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Joseph Bowden, late of Ashburton, Devonshire, Victualler Milliner, Straw-Bonnet-Miiker, and Dealer in Boots and and Farrier. Shoes. William Twogood, late of Awliscombe, Devonshire, Farmer. Joseph Harvey, formerly of Blackwall South Shore, Gates- Elizabeth Parker, formerly of Stoneliouse, out of business then head, Durham. Journeyman Paper-Maker, and late of the of Stoke, and late of Devonport, all in Devonshire, School- Milk-Market, Sandgate, within the Liberties of Newcastle- mistress.