DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Culture of Democracy in Colombia, 2011 Democratic Attitudes Post­Uribe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Political Culture of Democracy in Colombia, 2011 Democratic Attitudes Post­Uribe The Political Culture of Democracy in Colombia, 2011 Democratic Attitudes Post­Uribe Juan Carlos Rodríguez Raga, Ph.D. Universidad de los Andes Mitchell A. Seligson, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… … This study was made possible thanks to support provided by the program for Democracy and Human Rights of the United States Agency for International Development. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of the United States Agency for International Development. Bogotá, November 2011 Table of contents 3 Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF TABLES ..............................................................................................................................................................11 PROLOGUE: BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY ....................................................................................................................13 Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................................................................15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................17 I. CONTEXT AND DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE .......................................................................................................23 Economic context ........................................................................................................................................................................23 Perceptions of the economic situation ...............................................................................................................................26 Political context............................................................................................................................................................................32 Description of the sample ........................................................................................................................................................33 II. DEMOCRATIC AND ANTI­DEMOCRATIC ATTITUDES ..............................................................................................45 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................45 Democratic attitudes and values...........................................................................................................................................45 Factors that influence democratic attitudes ....................................................................................................................48 Direct ties between citizen and leader.............................................................................................................................................48 Other factors included in the models................................................................................................................................................50 Ideology and political party affinity ........................................................................................................................................................... 50 Evaluating the administration’s performance ....................................................................................................................................... 51 Evaluating the economy .................................................................................................................................................................................. 51 Sociodemographic characteristics ..............................................................................................................................................................51 Results.............................................................................................................................................................................................................51 Support for democracy .................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Satisfaction with democracy.......................................................................................................................................................................... 54 Support for the political system................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Anti‐democratic attitudes........................................................................................................................................................58 Attitudes against separation of powers and checks & balances ..........................................................................................58 Attitudes against the opposition and minorities.........................................................................................................................61 Factors that influence anti‐democratic attitudes...........................................................................................................65 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................67 Appendix .........................................................................................................................................................................................69 III. STABLE DEMOCRACY AND TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS..........................................................................................71 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................71 Stable democracy.........................................................................................................................................................................71 Trust in institutions....................................................................................................................................................................77 Evaluating the administration and Congress...................................................................................................................82 Evaluating the performance of the administration...................................................................................................................82 Evaluating the performance of Congress .......................................................................................................................................88 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................90 Appendix .........................................................................................................................................................................................91 IV. PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRUPTION, AND THE ARMED CONFLICT .............................................................................93 4 LAPOP – AmericasBarometer, Colombia 2011 Public safety...................................................................................................................................................................................93 The problem of safety ..............................................................................................................................................................................93 Perceptions of safety and justice ........................................................................................................................................................97 Crime............................................................................................................................................................................................................103 Corruption ................................................................................................................................................................................... 108 Perceptions of corruption...................................................................................................................................................................109 Attitudes toward corruption .............................................................................................................................................................110 Victimization by corruption ..............................................................................................................................................................113 The armed conflict ..................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colombia Country Fact Sheet
    National Documentation Packages, Issue Papers and Country Fact Sheets Page 1 of 4 Home > Research > National Documentation Packages, Issue Papers and Country Fact Sheets Country Fact Sheet COLOMBIA April 2007 Disclaimer 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Official name Republic of Colombia. Geography Colombia is located at the northern point of South America and shares borders with Panama, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil and Venezuela. Colombia has a total of 3,208 km of coastline on the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea. The total area is 1,038,700 km2. The coast has a tropical climate, the interior plateaux are temperate and some Andean areas have snow year-round. Population and density Population: 43,593,035 (July 2006 estimate). Density: 39.7 persons per km2. Principal cities and populations (2005 estimate) Bogota (political capital) 8,350,000; Medellin 3,450,000; Cali 2,700,000; Barranquilla 1,925,000; Cartagena 1,075,000. Languages Spanish (official). Religions Catholic 90%. Ethnic groups Mestizo 58%, white 20%, mulatto 14%, black 4%, mixed black-Amerindian 3%, Amerindian 1%. Approximately 75 % of Colombians are of mixed-blood. Demographics http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca:8080/Publications/PubIP_DI.aspx?id=209&pcid=359 2/23/2011 National Documentation Packages, Issue Papers and Country Fact Sheets Page 2 of 4 Population growth rate: 1.46% (2006 estimate). Infant mortality rate: 20.35 deaths/1,000 live births. Life expectancy at birth: 72.6 (2004). Fertility rate: 2.54 children born/woman (2006 estimate). Literacy: 92.8% of people aged 15 and older can read and write (2004). Currency Colombian Peso (COP).
    [Show full text]
  • Political Finance and the Equal Participation of Women in Colombia: a Situation Analysis
    Political finance and the equal participation of women in Colombia: a situation analysis The impact of economic resources on the political participation of women has become a prominent issue in the field of comparative political finance. In recent Kevin Casas-Zamora and Elin Falguera years, there has been a growing recognition that politics dominated by money is, more often than not, politics dominated by men. It is not surprising that the issue has moved to the forefront of debates on gender and political finance. This report assesses the extent to which political finance is a significant obstacle to women running for political office. It focuses on the experience of Colombia, a country that, like many other Latin American countries, continues to struggle with the legacies of pervasive social, economic and political inequality that disproportionately affect women. It explores the role of political finance in hindering women’s access to political power and its relative weight with respect to other obstacles to women’s political participation. It also suggests a number of institutional changes that might ameliorate some of the problems identified, while being fully cognizant of the limits to institutional change recasting deep-rooted gender imbalances. International IDEA NIMD Strömsborg Passage 31 SE-103 34 Stockholm 2511 AB The Hague Sweden The Netherlands T +46 (0) 8 698 37 00 T +31 (0)70 311 54 64 F +46 (0) 8 20 24 22 F +31 (0)70 311 54 65 [email protected] [email protected] www.idea.int www.nimd.org About the organizations About the authors International IDEA Kevin Casas-Zamora is a Senior Fellow and Director of the Peter D.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America's Shifting Politics
    October 2018, Volume 29, Number 4 $14.00 Latin America’s Shifting Politics Steven Levitsky Forrest Colburn and Arturo Cruz S. Alberto Vergara Carlos de la Torre Jean-Paul Faguet Laura Gamboa Kenneth Greene and Mariano Sánchez-Talanquer Democracy’s Near Misses Tom Ginsburg and Aziz Huq Liberal Democracy’s Crisis of Confidence Richard Wike and Janell Fetterolf Alexander Libman & Anastassia Obydenkova on Authoritarian Regionalism Sophie Lemi`ere on Malaysia’s Elections Christopher Carothers on Competitive Authoritarianism Tarek Masoud on Tunisian Exceptionalism Why National Identity Matters Francis Fukuyama Latin America’s Shifting Politics THE PEACE PROCESS AND COLOMBIA’S ELECTIONS Laura Gamboa Laura Gamboa is assistant professor of political science at Utah State University. She is currently working on a book that examines opposition strategies against democratically elected presidents who try to under- mine checks and balances and stay in office, effectively eroding democ- racy. Her work has been published in Political Research Quarterly and Comparative Politics. As his two terms in the presidency neared their end in 2018, Juan Manuel Santos might have expected that he would be enjoying high standing among his fellow Colombians. Having won the 2016 Nobel Peace Prize for his role as leader of a peace deal with the long-running leftist insurgency known as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Co- lombia (FARC), Santos could fairly claim to be leaving his country of fifty-million people a better democracy than it had been when he first took office in 2010. The peace agreement is Colombia’s most important achievement in recent decades. Signed in November 2016, the accord ended an armed conflict that had gone on for more than five decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Colombian Conservative Party, Colombian Liberal Party, Social National Unity Party
    Political Highlights Government type: Presidential Republic Head of state: Ivan Duque Marquez Elections/appointments: The president is directly elected by absolute majority vote for a 4-year term Next legislative and presidential elections are due in March 2022 and May 2022 respectively Legal system: Civil law Legislative branch: Bicameral congress (108-seat Senate and 172-seat Chamber of Representatives) Major political parties: Democratic Center Party, Radical Change, Colombian Conservative Party, Colombian Liberal Party, Social National Unity Party Economic Trend Economic Indicators 2018 2019 2020* 2021^ 2022^ Nominal GDP (USD bn) 333.5 323.6 264.9 280.4 296.2 Real GDP growth (%) 2.5 3.3 -8.2 4 3.6 GDP per capita (USD) 6,692 6,423 5,207 5,457 5,713 Inflation (%) 3.2 3.5 2.4 2.1 2.5 Current account balance (% of GDP) -3.9 -4.2 -4 -3.9 -3.8 General government debt (% of GDP) 53.7 52.3 68.2 68.1 67.3 *Estimate ^Forecast Hong Kong Total Exports to Colombia Hong Kong Total Exports to Colombia (HK$ billion) (World) (Colombia) Year Colombia World 4,500 7.0 2011 2.5 3,337 4,000 2012 2.6 3,434 6.0 2013 3.4 3,560 3,500 2014 5.3 3,673 5.0 2015 5.4 3,605 3,000 2016 World 3.9 3,588 4.0 2017 3.7 3,876 2,500 2018 Colombia 6.1 4,158 2,000 2019 5.3 3,989 (HK$ billion) 3.0 2020 3.5 3,928 1,500 2.0 1,000 1.0 500 0 0.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Hong Kong Exports to Colombia by Product (% share) Hong Kong Exports to Colombia by Product (2020) Electrical machinery, Product 2020 apparatus and Telecommunications and sound recording
    [Show full text]
  • The Formal Determinants of Informal Settlements in Bogota, Colombia
    The Formal Determinants of Informal Settlements in Bogota, Colombia by Andres Guillermo Blanco This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Warner,Mildred E (Chairperson) Nicholson,Charles Frederick (Minor Member) Roldan,Mary Jean (Minor Member) THE FORMAL DETERMINANTS OF INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS IN BOGOTA, COLOMBIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Andres Guillermo Blanco August 2010 © 2010 Andres Guillermo Blanco THE FORMAL DETERMINANTS OF INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS IN BOGOTA, COLOMBIA Andres Guillermo Blanco, Ph. D. Cornell University 2010 The central question in this dissertation is why formal mechanisms of housing production and land allocation have been unable to absorb the growing demand in the cities of the developing world. My general methodological approach is to analyze the historical process of urbanization of Bogotá, Colombia a city known by the prevalence of informality and its rich experience in the implementation of different land and housing policies. My hypothesis is that informal settlements are structural to the formal process of production of the built environment because, within a context of inequality and natural property rights, this process tends to under-provide land with urban services. The dissertation is structured as three interrelated papers. In the first paper, I study the relationship between an institutional context dominated by the concept of property as a natural right and the pattern of under-provision of urban services arguing that informality is engendered in the same formal process of production and allocation of the built environment because the concept of property as a natural right produces a dynamic of privatization of benefits of city growth and socialization of its costs that results in under-provision of urban services.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Legislative and Presidential Elections Colombia Internacional, Núm
    Colombia Internacional ISSN: 0121-5612 [email protected] Universidad de Los Andes Colombia Pachón, Mónica; Hoskin, Gary Colombia 2010: An Analysis of the Legislative and Presidential Elections Colombia Internacional, núm. 74, julio-diciembre, 2011, pp. 9-26 Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81222598002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative ColombiaInternacional 74, julio a diciembre de 2011: 9-26 Colombia 2010: análisis de las elecciones presidenciales y legislativas Mónica Pachón Universidad de los Andes Gary Hoskin Universidad de los Andes Resumen Los resultados de las elecciones de Congreso y presidente del 2010 en Colombia muestran la consolidación del multipartidismo en el cual las coaliciones postelectorales se han convertido en una constante desde el colapso del sistema bipartidista a finales de los años noventa. El propósito del artículo es discutir los resultados electorales, con especial atención a la forma en que la propuesta del referendo para reelegir a Álvaro Uribe Vélez impactó la dinámica electoral. Primero, analiza el contexto de las elecciones, posteriormente los resultados electorales y finalmente cómo este nuevo panorama consolida un sistema multipartidista en el nivel nacional después de la reforma del 2003. Palabras clave elecciones • sistema de partidos • Álvaro Uribe Vélez • Juan Manuel Santos • Antanas Mockus • Colombia Colombia 2010: An Analysis of the Legislative and Presidential Elections Abstract The 2010 Colombian elections clearly moved the country toward a more multiparty system, characterized by the practice of post-electoral coalitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan Duque, the Opposition Takes Over in Colombia
    : SPECIAL REPORT Ivan Duque, the opposition takes over in Colombia Madrid, july 2018 Barcelona • Bogota • Buenos Aires • Havana • Lima • Lisbon • Madrid • Mexico City • Miami • New York City • Panama City • Quito • Rio de Janeiro • Sao Paulo Santiago • Santo Domingo • Washington, DC IVAN DUQUE, THE OPPOSITION TAKES OVER IN COLOMBIA 1. INTRODUCTION The election of the new president of the Republic reveals a new 1. INTRODUCTION distribution of public power in Colombia and the system of 2. SUPPORT FOR REFORMS AND checks and balances in the country. INITIATIVES AUTHORS June 17, Ivan Duque Marquez, candidate for the opposition party, Democratic Center, was elected president for the 2018-2022 term. His victory proved his group’s strength, also reflected in the March legislative elections, when it was consolidated as the largest political force in the current Congress with 51 members. Duque was also supported by the parties Radical Change, Liberal, Conservative, Independent Movement of Absolute Renovation (MIRA) and Colombia Justa-Libre, who collectively make a significant majority in Congress (135 members, distributed among the Senate and the House of Representatives). So, the opposition to a government that had Congress as an important ally has now reached the executive with an even larger percentage of Congress in its favor. (Figure 1) Figure 1 2 IVAN DUQUE, THE OPPOSITION TAKES OVER IN COLOMBIA Up until the recent elections, The presence of a stronger the current president had 56% Democratic Center and of Congress in his favor and the participation of the “The new president and 21% supporting the opposition, Conservative Party and MIRA his party will have to which is now preparing to Party in the NO campaign yield on some points govern.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Bogotá
    COLOMBIA Sea bean Carib Barranquilla Cartagena E T R O N P A A N T A M S VENEZUELA A O C Cucuta Bucaramanga Medellín A N n I a e D c N O A c BOGOTÁ S i O f A N i L c L a P Villavicencio Buenaventura Cali A C I F I C A P Pasto A M A Z O N I A ECUADOR BRAZIL PERU 0 300 kilometres mauricio velásquez THE BATTLE OF BOGOTÁ Colombia Between War and Peace he colombian presidential election of 2014 proved to be a landmark in the country’s recent history: the first major political defeat sustained by uribismo since the beginning of the new century. The hard-right champion Álvaro Uribe Vélez Thad swept to victory in 2002 and was comfortably re-elected four years later. After Colombia’s constitutional court blocked Uribe’s attempt to stand for a third term in office, his anointed successor Juan Manuel Santos chalked up another triumph for the Uribe camp in 2010. But Santos and Uribe would part ways acrimoniously over the question of peace talks with the farc guerrillas, leading the former president to endorse Óscar Iván Zuluaga in the 2014 poll. Zuluaga emerged victori- ous in the first round of the presidential elections, but was defeated by Santos in the subsequent run-off with support from a hastily-improvised coalition of forces spanning the political ground from left to centre-right. Uribe’s first electoral setback has ensured that talks between Santos and the farc leadership will continue, keeping alive the possibility of a nego- tiated settlement to end a conflict that has endured for half a century and claimed over 200,000 lives.
    [Show full text]
  • ENHANCING the POLITICAL FEASIBILITY of HEALTH REFORM: the COLOMBIA CASE Enhancing the Political Feasibility of Health Reform: the Colombia Case
    June 2000 39 ENHANCING THE POLITICAL FEASIBILITY OF HEALTH REFORM: THE COLOMBIA CASE Enhancing the Political Feasibility of Health Reform: The Colombia Case Alejandra González-Rossetti, M.Sc., M.P.A. Harvard School of Public Health Patricia Ramírez Harvard School of Public Health June 2000 This publication was produced by the Data for Decision Making (DDM) project, which is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Cooperative Agreement No. DPE-5991-A-00-1052-00 with the Harvard School of Public Health. It was done in collaboration with the Latin America and Caribbean Regional Health Sector Reform Initiative, funded by USAID under Contract No. HRN-5974-C- 00-5024-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY.......................................................................................................................III SPANISH............................................................................................................................................................ III ENGLISH ........................................................................................................................................................... III INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 1 POLITICAL ECONOMY CONTEXT.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Election Political Panorama – Colombia SPECIAL REPORT
    SPECIAL REPORT Pre-election political Panorama – Colombia Bogotá, February 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO PRE-ELECTION POLITICAL PANORAMA – COLOMBIA 1. INTRODUCTION 1.INTRODUCTION 2. GENERAL ANALYSIS LLORENTE & CUENCA’s team produced the following document which 3. ELECTORAL MAP ACCORDING summarizes the present political panorama with a view to the elections TO THE POLITICAL PARTIES of the Senate (9th of March), the House of Representatives (9th of POLITICIANS March) and the Presidency of the Republic (25th of May) which will take AUTHORS place during this year. LLORENTE & CUENCA The main political parties and their stance with regards the popular election day are presented. 2. GENERAL ANALYSIS After months of uncertainty and speculations, the Colombian political panorama is beginning to clarify itself. The announcement of the ex- President Álvaro Uribe Vélez to head the list of the Centro Democrático (Democratic Centre) for the Senate, the definition of candidates of other collectives for the Presidency, the announcement of President Juan Manual Santos to stand for re-election and the beginning of campaigns for the candidates for the seats in the Senate and the Camera of Representatives, are facts which begin to outline the electoral future. In the specific case of the presidential elections, the most prominent facts are focused on the announcement of the Partido Conservador (Conservative Party) to present its own candidate, leaving behind the alliance with the president Juan Manuel Santos for re-election. In addition, the latter has still not defined who will be his formula in the Vice-presidency, but speculations suggest that it could be the former Director of the National Police, Oscar Naranjo.
    [Show full text]
  • National Front's
    At a glance April 2015 Colombia: political parties The political party system in Colombia is relatively stable in comparison with other Latin American countries. Gradually evolving from the 19th century two-party system to the moderate multi-party system of today, it has never collapsed or been overthrown, despite having endured many years of violent confrontation. Background The current political party system in Colombia can be traced back to the mid-19th century. The Liberal Party, mainly made up of traders and artisans, backed the separation of Church and State as well as the development of free trade and federalism. On the other hand, the Conservative Party represented big landowners, the clergy and traditional families. The Conservatives dominated from 1886 to 1930, until the 1928 Bananera massacre initiated a switch to left-leaning politics, starting a period of Liberal Party rule, marked by violence generated by land conflict. In 1934, Liberal President López Pumarejo launched the Revolución en Marcha to modernise the state and agriculture. With the Conservatives again in power, the 1948 assassination of Jorge Eliécer Gaitán, a left-wing leader of the Liberal Party and a presidential candidate, provoked the 'Bogotazo' riots, and as of 1949, the banning and persecution of leftist organisations. These events led to a period of confrontation known as La Violencia, which ended in 1958 with an arrangement between the Conservatives and Liberals, the Frente Nacional, under which they alternated in power and marginalised other movements and parties. Deprived of the right to political expression, the National Front's opponents turned to armed rebellion, thus starting the conflict that gave birth to guerrilla movements (in particular FARC and ELN) and claimed over 200 000 lives in 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Elections in Colombia: a Test for Peace?
    BRIEFING 2018 elections in Colombia: A test for peace? SUMMARY 2018 is an important election year in Colombia, with legislative elections held in March, and the presidential election due on 27 May, with a second round probable, on 17 June, if no candidate gets over 50 % of the vote. It is also the first time in more than 50 years that elections are being held in peace, after an agreement was reached, and is now being implemented, with the guerilla, FARC. The legislative elections have left a fragmented Congress dominated by the right, and the presidential race, though still uncertain, seems to be polarised by a right-wing candidate, Ivan Duque, and his left-wing opponent, Gustavo Petro. Of the six candidates for the presidency, only Ivan Duque, from the Democratic Centre, has openly opposed the agreements made with the FARC, and has promised to make 'structural modifications', in particular regarding the Special Justice for Peace mechanism. The EU, which has actively supported the peace process in Colombia, has sent an electoral expert mission to follow the elections, and the European Parliament will also be present, through a multi-party delegation of eight MEPs. In this Briefing Introduction..............................................................................1 The March 2018 legislative elections ................................2 The presidential elections.....................................................3 The peace process...................................................................5 Colombia and the EU .............................................................6 EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Enrique Gómez Ramírez Members' Research Service PE 621.899 – May 2018 EN EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Introduction 2018 is an important election year in Colombia, as legislative elections were held in March, and presidential ones will be held on 27 May, with a second round likely on 17 June, as no candidate is expected to gain over 50 % of the vote.
    [Show full text]