DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Attachment O Update – Transmission Stakeholder Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Attachment O Update – Transmission Stakeholder Meeting July 27, 2020 Summarize MISO Transmission Owner protocols under ER13-2379 Review the City of Springfield, IL – CWLP Transmission Revenue Requirement Formula Review the CWLP Attachment O Summary 2 Date/Deadline Activity June 1st Annual Update is published September 1st Owner holds annual meeting December 1st Deadline for Interested Parties to submit information requests January 10th Deadline for Owner to respond to information requests January 31st Deadline for Interested Parties to submit Informal Challenges February 28th Deadline for Owners to respond to Informal Challenges March 15th Deadline for Owners to submit Informational Filing to FERC March 31st Deadline for Interested Parties to file Formal Challenge at FERC 3 https://www.misoenergy.o rg/markets-and- operations/settlements/to -rate-data/city-water- light--power--- springfield-il- cwlp/#nt=%2Frateyear%3A 2020&t=10&p=0&s=tspos teddate&sd=desc City Water Light & Power – Springfield, IL (CWLP) Contact for Informational Request and Challenges [email protected] 217-789-2116 Ext. 2643 4 FERC Approved Rate Formulae Distinct templates for Owners using FERC Form 1 vs. Owners using EIA 412 The Timing of rate impact differs for Owners using Historical data vs. Owners approved for Forward-Looking rates and incentives. CWLP utilizes historical data only, as of the most recently audited fiscal year. Net Revenue Requirement = O&M + Depreciation + Taxes + Return on Rate Base–Attachment GG–Attachment MM-Revenue credits Return on Rate Base = Net Plant in Service + Total Working Capital + Land held for Future Use x Weighted Rate of Return 5 Page Line FY2018* FY2019** Delta Percent 3 8 TOTAL O&M $ 2,848,291 $ 2,946,122 $ 97,830 3.43% 3 12 TOTAL DEPRECIATION $ 1,398,672 $ 1,451,217 $ 52,545 3.76% 3 20 TOTAL TAXES $ 685,503 $ 689,265 $ 3,762 0.55% 3 28 RETURN ON RATE BASE $ 1,467,675 $ 1,393,225 $ (74,450) -5.07% 3 29 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENTSum(3.8 + 3.12 +3 .20 +3.28) $ 6,400,141 $ 6,479,829 $ 79,687 1.25% 3 30 LESS ATTACHMENT GG $ 924,188 $ 908,080 $ (16,108) -1.74% 3 31 LESS ATTACHMENT MM $ - $ - $ - 1 6 LESS REVENUE CREDITS $ 101,413 $ 91,217 $ (10,196) -10.05% 1 7 NET REVENUE REQUIREMENT Sum (3.29 - 3.30 - 3.31 -1.6) $ 5,374,540 $ 5,480,532 $ 105,991 1.97% *Restated due to ROE change, 10.02% per Opinion 569A *For the previous 12 months ending 02/28/2019 Allocators: TP = Percentage of Transmission Plant in ISO Rates TE = Percentage of Transmission Expenses in ISO Rates W/S = Percentage of Transmission - Related Wages/Salaries to Total Wages/Salaries GP = Percentage of Transmission - Related Gross Plant ROE Determination ROE per Opinion 569A issued on May 21, 2020 10.02% RTO Adder per ER15-1067, Effective June 16, 2015 0.50% 6 Attachment O-EIA Non-Levelized Generic Page 1 of 5 Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 02/28/19 Utilizing EIA Form 412 Data City Water, Light and Power - Springfield, IL Line Allocated No. Amount 1 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENT (page 3, line 31) $ 5,571,749 REVENUE CREDITS (Note T) Total Allocator 2 Account No. 454 (page 4, line 30) 0 TP 0.96247 0 3 Account No. 456.1 (page 4, line 33) 94,774 TP 0.96247 91,217 4 Revenues from Grandfathered Interzonal Transactions TP 0.96247 0 5 Revenues from service provided by the ISO at a discount 0 TP 0.96247 0 6 TOTAL REVENUE CREDITS (sum lines 2-5) 91,217 6a Adjustments to Net Revenue Requirement (Note CC) 0 6b Interest on Adjustments (Note DD) 0 6c Total Adjustment (line 6a + line 6b) 0 7 NET REVENUE REQUIREMENT (line 1 minus line 6 plus Line 6c) $ 5,480,532 DIVISOR 8 Average of 12 coincident system peaks for requirements (RQ) service (Note A) 304,000 9 Plus 12 CP of firm bundled sales over one year not in line 8. (Note B) 0 10 Plus 12 CP of Network Load not in line 8 (Note C) 0 11 Less 12 CP of firm P-T-P over one year (enter negative) (Note D) 0 12 Plus Contract Demand of firm P-T-P over one year 0 13 Less Contract Demand from Grandfathered Interzonal transactions over one year (enter negative) (Note S) 0 14 Less 12 CP or Contract Demands from service over one year provided by ISO at a discount (enter negative) 0 15 Divisor (sum lines 8-14) 304,000 16 Annual Cost ($/kW/Yr) (line 7 / line 15) 18.028 17 Network & P-to-P Rate ($/kW/Mo) (line 11 / 12) 1.502 Peak Rate Off-Peak Rate 18 Point-To-Point Rate ($/kW/Wk) (line 16 / 52; line 16 / 52) 0.347 $0.347 19 Point-To-Point Rate ($/kW/Day) (line 16 / 260; line 16 / 365) 0.069 Capped at weekly rate $0.049 20 Point-To-Point Rate ($/MWh) (line 16 / 4,160; line 16 / 8,760 4.334 Capped at weekly $2.058 times 1,000) and daily rates 21 FERC Annual Charge ($/MWh) (Note E) $0.000 Short Term $0.000 Short Term 22 $0.000 Long Term $0.000 Long Term 7 Attachment O-EIA Non-Levelized Generic Page 2 of 5 Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 02/28/19 Utilizing EIA Form 412 Data City Water, Light and Power - Springfield, IL (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Line EIA 412 Transmission No. RATE BASE: Reference Company Total Allocator (Col 3 times Col 4) GROSS PLANT IN SERVICE (Note AA) 1 Production IV.6.e 1,072,739,486 NA 2 Transmission IV.7.e 83,124,254 TP 0.96247 80,004,662 3 Distribution IV.8.e 317,347,335 NA 4 General & Intangible IV.9.e & IV.1.e 68,867,348 W/S 0.07116 4,900,688 5 Common 0 CE 0.07116 0 6 TOTAL GROSS PLANT (sum lines 1-5) 1,542,078,423 GP= 5.506% 84,905,350 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Note AA) 7 Production 425,552,482 NA 8 Transmission 61,853,172 TP 0.96247 59,531,868 9 Distribution 203,929,940 NA 10 General & Intangible 46,882,595 W/S 0.07116 3,336,225 11 Common 0 CE 0.07116 0 12 TOTAL ACCUM. DEPRECIATION (sum lines 7-11) 738,218,189 62,868,093 NET PLANT IN SERVICE 13 Production (line 1- line 7) 647,187,004 14 Transmission (line 2- line 8) 21,271,082 20,472,794 15 Distribution (line 3 - line 9) 113,417,395 16 General & Intangible (line 4 - line 10) 21,984,753 1,564,463 17 Common (line 5 - line 11) 0 0 18 TOTAL NET PLANT (sum lines 13-17) 803,860,234 NP= 2.741% 22,037,257 ADJUSTMENTS TO RATE BASE (Note F) 19 Account No. 281 (enter negative) 0 zero 0 20 Account No. 282 (enter negative) 0 NP 0.02741 0 21 Account No. 283 (enter negative) 0 NP 0.02741 0 22 Account No. 190 0 NP 0.02741 0 23 Account No. 255 (enter negative) 0 NP 0.02741 0 24 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS (sum lines 19 - 23) 0 0 25 LAND HELD FOR FUTURE USE IV.12.e (Note G) 0 TP 0.96247 0 WORKING CAPITAL (Note H) 26 CWC 1,885,606 368,265 27 Materials & Supplies (Note G) 422,942 TE 0.59952 253,561 28 Prepayments II.20.b 1,959,763 GP 0.05506 107,903 29 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL (sum lines 26 - 28) 4,268,311 729,729 30 RATE BASE (sum lines 18, 24, 25, and 29) 808,128,545 22,766,986 8 Attachment O-EIA Non-Levelized Generic Page 3 of 5 Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 02/28/19 Utilizing EIA Form 412 Data City Water, Light and Power - Springfield, IL (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Line EIA 412 Transmission No. Reference Company Total Allocator (Col 3 times Col 4) O&M (Note BB) 1 Transmission VII.8.d 7,133,133 TE 0.59952 4,276,441 1a Less LSE Expenses included in Transmission O&M Accounts (Note V) 0 1.00000 0 2 Less Account 565 3,588,814 TE 0.59952 2,151,558 3 A&G VII.13.d 11,696,002 W/S 0.07116 832,302 4 Less FERC Annual Fees 150,260 W/S 0.07116 10,693 5 Less EPRI & Reg. Comm. Exp. & Non-safety Ad. (Note I) 5,216 W/S 0.07116 371 5a Plus Transmission Related Reg. Comm. Exp. (Note I) 0 TE 0.59952 0 6 Common 0 CE 0.07116 0 7 Transmission Lease Payments 0 NA 1.00000 0 8 TOTAL O&M (sum lines 1, 3, 5a, 6, 7 less 1a, 2, 4, 5) 15,084,846 2,946,122 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSE (Note AA) 9 Transmission 1,305,898 TP 0.96247 1,256,889 10 General & Intangible 2,730,818 W/S 0.07116 194,328 11 Common 0 CE 0.07116 0 12 TOTAL DEPRECIATION (sum lines 9 - 11) 4,036,716 1,451,217 9 TAXES OTHER THAN INCOME TAXES (Note J) LABOR RELATED 13 Payroll 0 W/S 0.07116 0 14 Highway and vehicle 0 W/S 0.07116 0 15 PLANT RELATED 16 Property 0 GP 0.05506 0 17 Gross Receipts 0 NA zero 0 18 Other 0 GP 0.05506 0 19 Payments in lieu of taxes 12,518,651 GP 0.05506 689,265 20 TOTAL OTHER TAXES (sum lines 13 - 19) 12,518,651 689,265 INCOME TAXES (Note K) NA 21 T=1 - {[(1 - SIT) * (1 - FIT)] / (1 - SIT * FIT * p)} = 0.00% 22 CIT=(T/1-T) * (1-(WCLTD/R)) = 0.00% where WCLTD=(page 4, line 22) and R= (page 4, line 24) and FIT, SIT & p are as given in footnote K.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By S. Zhang Et Al
    Reply to comments on “The Challenge to NOX Emission Control for Heavy-duty Diesel Vehicles in China” by S. Zhang et al “Black” means the comments from reviewer and “Blue” text are our responses. We are deeply grateful to the referees of this paper for the very helpful comments. These comments are fully understood by the authors and individually responded to. Our responses to the comments are listed below. Reply to comments from Anonymous Referee #1: Overall Comments: My overall comments are favorable. I thought the paper presented interesting results of the use of a vehicle emission model to infer the dominant sources of vehicle pollution in Macao, as well as the potential use of traffic information linked to an emission model and air dispersion model to inform environmental and transportation policy. My major comment on the content of the paper, is that the authors need to provide more information into how the emissions and air quality concentrations were estimated are estimated. For example, the paper is unclear on how the vehicle split by link is estimated, how the speeds are estimated and applied in the vehicle emission model, and how the ‘fleet average’ emission rates in Table 4 are estimated. Also the comment Printer-friendly version Discussion paper discussion on the air dispersion modeling is very limited. We appreciate the referee’s favorable comments. According to specific comment on the method and data details, we try out best to inform the readers of the estimation of fleet split and speed profiles (e.g., Equations 3, 5 and 6, see Page 7), the development of local emission factors (e.g., Page 9 to Page 10).
    [Show full text]
  • Of 5 Formula Rate
    Page 1 of 5 Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template - Attachment H-30A For the 12 months ended 12/31/19 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data Transource Maryland, LLC (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Line Allocated No. Source Amount 1 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENT, without incentives (page 3, line 49) $ 1,423,484 REVENUE CREDITS (Note A) Total Allocator 2 Account No. 454 (page 4, line 20) - TP 1.0000 - 3 Accounts 456.0 and 456.1 (page 4, line 21) - TP 1.0000 - 4 Revenues from Grandfathered Interzonal Transactions (Note B) - TP 1.0000 - 5 Revenues from service provided by the ISO at a discount - TP 1.0000 - 6 TOTAL REVENUE CREDITS (Sum of Lines 2 through 5) - - 7 Prior Period Adjustments Attachment 11 - DA 1.0000 - 8 True-up Adjustment with Interest Attachment 3, line 9, Col. G+H - DA 1.0000 - 9 Facility Credits under Section 30.9 of the PJM OATT Attachment 13 - DA 1.0000 - 10 NET ANNUAL TRANSMISSION REVENUE REQUIREMENT ( Line 1 less line 6 plus lines 7,8, and 9) $ 1,423,484 Page 2 of 5 Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template - Attachment H-30A For the 12 months ended 12/31/19 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data Transource Maryland, LLC (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Transmission Line Source Company Total Allocator (Col 3 times Col 4) No. RATE BASE: (Note R) GROSS PLANT IN SERVICE Note C 1 Production 205.46.g for end of year, records for other months - NA - - 2 Transmission Attachment 4, Line 14, Col. (b) - TP 1.0000 - 3 Distribution 207.75.g for end of year, records for other months - NA - - 4 General & Intangible Attachment 4, Line 14, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • A Numerical Study of the Contribution to the Air Pollutant in Beijing During Carebeijing-2006” by Q
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, C1641–C1644, 2011 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/C1641/2011/ Chemistry ACPD © Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under and Physics 11, C1641–C1644, 2011 the Creative Commons Attribute 3.0 License. Discussions Interactive Comment Interactive comment on “A numerical study of the contribution to the air pollutant in Beijing during CAREBeijing-2006” by Q. Z. Wu et al. Anonymous Referee #2 Received and published: 10 April 2011 This is a very interesting study of the influence of local and regional emissions in and around Beijing. Through tagging source emissions in different counties their contri- bution to Beijing is quantified in a regional model simulation. The model results are evaluated with observations in the region. Full Screen / Esc Some details of the analysis and model evaluation are not clear. The authors need to be much more explicit and clear about which model levels and measurement altitudes Printer-friendly Version they are using. Interactive Discussion The paper is appropriate for ACP and I recommend publication after addressing my comments below and improving the English. Discussion Paper Specific comments: C1641 p.5275, line 13-17: I do not understand this sentence. Provide a more complete expla- nation of what you did. ACPD p. 5276: I disagree that ‘The Supplements provides more details on the tagged 11, C1641–C1644, 2011 method’. The supplement does show 2 nice animations of a tag and how it evolves with time. I think a little more description of the tagging is needed. Tagging SO2 and PM10 is straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction in a Chinese As a Foreign Language Classroom: a Conversation Analysis Approach
    INTERACTION IN A CHINESE AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM: A CONVERSATION ANALYSIS APPROACH JOHN RYLANDER University of Hawai‘i ABSTRACT The following research involves the use of Conversation Analysis (CA) in the analysis of classroom discourse within a year-long university level Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) course. The goals of the research were: (a) to look at how a specific, two-part activity within a CFL classroom is bounded by a pre-allocated instructor turn, (b) how the turn-taking structure of the activity is organized in terms of question/answer adjacency pairs, (c) how repair occurs within the data and whether, as well as in what form, uptake exists, and (d) how students orient to the on-going speech in general by incorporating the lexical and grammatical elements of the conversation within their turn-taking strategy. Findings show that though the instructor provided little repair, learners were generally receptive to it and produced uptake, and that the on-going classroom interaction provided linguistic input rich enough that participants were able to incorporate lexical items from it for use in their own talk. INTRODUCTION Markee (2000) argues that Conversation Analysis (CA) be incorporated into Second Language Acquisition (SLA) research methodologies. In his book “Conversation Analysis,” he attempts to refute claims that because the focus of CA is on language use and that it is fundamentally a behavioral discipline stemming from research as a sub- discipline of sociology dating back to the late1960s, it is methodologically incongruent with SLA research, whose research purpose is the understanding of the cognitive processes involved in SLA.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return
    U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return OMB No. 1545-0123 Form 1120 For calendar year 2020 or tax year beginning , 2020, ending , 20 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service ▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form1120 for instructions and the latest information. 2020 A Check if: Name B Employer identification number 1a Consolidated return (attach Form 851) . TYPE b Life/nonlife consoli- Number, street, and room or suite no. If a P.O. box, see instructions. C Date incorporated dated return . OR 2 Personal holding co. PRINT (attach Sch. PH) . City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code D Total assets (see instructions) 3 Personal service corp. (see instructions) . $ 4 Schedule M-3 attached E Check if: (1) Initial return (2) Final return (3) Name change (4) Address change 1a Gross receipts or sales . 1a b Returns and allowances . 1b c Balance. Subtract line 1b from line 1a . 1c 2 Cost of goods sold (attach Form 1125-A) . 2 3 Gross profit. Subtract line 2 from line 1c . 3 4 Dividends and inclusions (Schedule C, line 23) . 4 5 Interest . 5 Income 6 Gross rents . 6 7 Gross royalties . 7 8 Capital gain net income (attach Schedule D (Form 1120)) . 8 9 Net gain or (loss) from Form 4797, Part II, line 17 (attach Form 4797) . 9 10 Other income (see instructions—attach statement) . 10 11 Total income. Add lines 3 through 10 . ▶ 11 12 Compensation of officers (see instructions—attach Form 1125-E) . ▶ 12 13 Salaries and wages (less employment credits) . 13 14 Repairs and maintenance .
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Solutions for the Improvement of Co- and Intermodality for Long- Distance Travellers
    Optimal Regulation and Infrastructure for Ground, Air and Maritime Interfaces DELIVERABLE D6.4 TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CO- AND INTERMODALITY FOR LONG- DISTANCE TRAVELLERS Due Date: 30 November 2012 Submitted: 2 January 2013 Main Author: Mcrit Dissemination: Public Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme, Theme 7 Transport Contract number 265600 Project Start Date: 1 February 2011, Project Duration: 24 months TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS Document Control Sheet Contract Number: 265600 Project Acronym: ORIGAMI Workpackage: WP5 Technical Solutions, WP 6 Cross-Fertilisation Version: V0.2 Document History: Version Issue Date Distribution V0.1 21 December 2012 Peer-review V0.2 2 January 2013 Coordinator V1.0 2 January 2013 Consortium, Project Officer Classification – This report is: Draft Final X Confidential Restricted Public X Partners Owning: All Main Editor: Andreu Ulied, Oriol Biosca (Mcr) Christiane Bielefeldt (TRI), Marta Calvet, Rafa Rodrigo (Mcr), Michael Carreno, Kevin Cullinane, Helen Condie (TRI), Monika Bak, Partners Contributed: Przemyslaw Borkowski (UG), Benedikt Mandel, Oliver Schnell (MKM), Simon Shepherd, Bryan Matthews (ITS), Riccardo Enei (ISIS), Helmut Lemmerer, Guenter Emberger (TUW) Made Available To: All ORIGAMI Partners Ulied A, Biosca O, Bielefeldt C, Calvet M, Rodrigo R, Carreno M, Cullinane K, Condie H, Bak M, Borkowski P, Mandel B, Schnell O, This document should Shepherd S, Matthews B, Bonsall P, Enei R, Lemmerer H, Emberger be referenced as: G, “Finalised Collection of Best Practice Examples”, Milestone MS6 of ORIGAMI, Co-funded by FP7. TRI, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, January 2013 This document was created as part of the ORIGAMI project. All information is public and we encourage the use.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 767.92 KB, for 2015 Schedule C
    File pg. 11 Ovals must be filled in completely. Example: If any line shows a loss, mark an X in box at left of the line. Schedule C Massachusetts Profit or Loss from Business 2015 FIRST NAME M.I. LAST NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF PROPRIETOR BUSINESS NAME EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (if any) MAIN BUSINESS OR PROFESSION, INCLUDING PRODUCT OR SERVICE PRINCIPAL BUSINESS CODE (from U.S. Schedule C) ADDRESS NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES CITY/TOWN/POST OFFICE STATE ZIP + 4 Accounting Method: Cash Accrual Other (specify) Did you materially participate in the operation of this business during 2015? (If “no,” see line 33 instructions) . Yes No Did you claim the small business exemption from the sales tax on purchases of taxable energy or heating fuel during 2015? . Yes No Exclude interest (other than from Massachusetts banks) and dividends from lines 1 and 4 and enter such amount in line 32 and in Schedule B, line 3. Caution: If this income was reported to you on Form W-2 and the “Statutory employee” box on that form was checked, fill in here: 1 a. Gross receipts or sales . 00 5 If showing a loss, mark an X in box at left b. Returns and allowances. 00 a – b = 1 00 2 Cost of goods sold and/or operations (Schedule C-1, line 8) . 2 00 3 Gross profit. Subtract line 2 from line 1 . 3 00 4 Other income. Do not include interest income (other than from Mass. banks) and dividends . 4 00 5 Total income. Add line 3 and line 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Aerosol Physicochemical Properties and Implication for Visibility During an Intense Haze Episode During Winter in Beijing” by Y
    Open Access Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, C8492–C8500, 2014 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/14/C8492/2014/ Chemistry © Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribute 3.0 License. and Physics Discussions Interactive comment on “Aerosol physicochemical properties and implication for visibility during an intense haze episode during winter in Beijing” by Y. H. Wang et al. Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 27 October 2014 General comments: This paper characterizes the aerosol physical, chemical, and op- tical properties and implication of visibility during an intense haze episode in Beijing winter. Heavy haze episodes occur more frequently in Beijing and the Great North China Plain. The manuscript provides numerous information on aerosol physicochem- ical properties and the effect on visibility due to these haze particulates. It is useful to quantitatively estimate the aerosol direct radiative forcing under heavy haze cases. Ob- viously, there are numerous grammatical and technical errors in the manuscript. This paper is reconsidered to be acceptable and published after major revisions. Specific comments: (1)Abstract, lines 20-24: “Light scattering apportionment showed C8492 that organic. .. .contributed to light scattering fractions of 57%. .. ., respectively. This study indicated that the organic component in submicron aerosol plays an important role in visibility degradation in this haze episode in and around Beijing”. âGŠ˘ As is well known that, both of scattering and absorption of aerosol particles can degrade the visibility. Many studies also found that urban aerosols under haze events in Beijing did have moderate absorption of solar light, which means that the absorption of aerosols may contribute to the visibility degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 990-PF 2018
    OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation 2018 G Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury G Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2018 or tax year beginning , 2018, and ending , A Employer identification number Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. 13-1760106 475 Riverside Drive #900 B Telephone number (see instructions) New York, NY 10115 (212) 812-4200 C If exemption application is pending, check here. G G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1 . G Final return Amended return Foreign organizations, check here Address change Name change 2 Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check . G H Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation here and attach computation X Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated G I J Accounting method: Cash Accrual under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here. Fair market value of all assets at end of year X (from Part II, column (c), line 16) Other (specify) F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination G G $ 1146793281. (Part I, column (d) must be on cash basis.) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here. Part I Analysis of Revenue and (d) Disbursements Expenses (The total of amounts in (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net for charitable columns (b), (c), and (d) may not expenses per books income income purposes necessarily equal the amounts in (cash basis only) column (a) (see instructions).) 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Literary Chinese
    Introduction to Literary Chinese PART ONE 學 而 時 習 之 不 亦 說 乎 2012 R. Eno version 2 Contents Introduction ii Abbreviations and Grammatical Terms iii The Pronunciation of Pinyin Transcription iv Lessons Text 1. Mèngzǐ 孟子 6A.11 1 Text 2. Mèngzǐ 孟子 6A.16 11 Text 3. Xinxù 新序 1.16 20 Text 4. Xinxù 新序 5.18 28 Text 5. Xìao jing 孝經 1 37 Text 6. Lǐjì 禮記 ． Tán Gong pian 檀弓篇 (節選) 47 Text 7. Gǔshi shíjǐu shŏu 古詩 十九首 (四首) 56 Text 8. Mèngzǐ 孟子 1B.15 70 Text 9. Dàxúe 大學 1 78 Text 10. Mèngzǐ 孟子 1A.3 (節選) 85 Text 11. Zhuangzǐ 莊子．Ràng wáng pian 讓王篇 (節選) 92 Text 12. Zhàngúo cè 戰國策．Qí cè 齊策(節選) 99 Text 13. Táng shi sì shŏu 唐詩 四首 111 Text 14. Hán Feizǐ 韓非子．Nèi chúshuo 內儲說上 (節選) 123 Appendixes Appendix I: Grammatical Index 127 Appendix II: Vocabulary Index 130 i Introduction This set of readings comprises the first of a two-part online textbook in Literary Chinese (wényánwén 文言文) intended for students who have no prior background in the written language of traditional China. The lessons were developed for classroom use, but I imagine they could be helpful to a student studying individually. There are a number of good commercial textbooks of wényánwén and I don’t intend these materials to compete with them. Having compiled and used this text over years of teaching, however, it seems more useful to make it available than to file it away on a flash drive in a drawer.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 5 Formula Rate
    page 1 of 5 Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 12/31/2021 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data American Transmission Company LLC Thirteen Monthly Balances Composite Depreciation Rates Line Allocated No. Amount 1 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENT (page 3, line 31) $ 610,684,627 REVENUE CREDITS (Note T) Total Allocator 2 Account No. 454 (page 4, line 34) 1,600,000 TP 1.00000 1,600,000 3 Account No. 456.1 (page 4, line 37) 8,400,000 TP 1.00000 8,400,000 4 Revenues from Grandfathered Interzonal Transactions 0 TP 1.00000 0 5 Revenues from service provided by the ISO at a discount 0 TP 1.00000 0 6 TOTAL REVENUE CREDITS (sum lines 2-5) 10,000,000 7 NET REVENUE REQUIREMENT (line 1 minus line 6) $ 600,684,627 DIVISOR 8 Average of 12 coincident system peaks for requirements (RQ) service (Note A) 9,636,635 9 Plus 12 CP of firm bundled sales over one year not in line 8 (Note B) 0 10 Plus 12 CP of Network Load not in line 8 (Note C) 0 11 Less 12 CP of firm P-T-P over one year (enter negative) (Note D) 0 12 Plus Contract Demand of firm P-T-P over one year 0 13 Less Contract Demand from Grandfathered Interzonal Transactions over one year (enter negative) (Note S) 0 14 Less Contract Demands from service over one year provided by ISO at a discount (enter negative) 0 15 Divisor (sum lines 8-14) 9,636,635 16 Annual Cost ($/kW/Yr) (line 7 / line 15) 62.333 17 Network & P-to-P Rate ($/kW/Mo) (line 16 / 12) 5.194 Peak Rate Off-Peak Rate 18 Point-To-Point Rate ($/kW/Wk) (line 16 / 52; line 16 / 52) 1.199 $1.199 19 Point-To-Point Rate ($/kW/Day)
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule P-6 -1
    SCHEDULE P-6 -1- SALARIES & RELATED FRINGE BENEFITS LINE 3 General Management Personnel President Vice Presidents Assistant to president, vice president Controller Treasurer Corporate secretary Division Manager LINE 4 Flight Personnel Captains Check pilot Chief pilot Copilot Pilot Reserve pilot Test pilot Flight attendants Communications Officer Engineering Officer Navigation Officer LINE 5 Maintenance Labor Apprentice mechanic Carpenter Chief mechanic Cleaner Crew chief Electrician Engineer Foreman Inspector Lead mechanic Mechanic Mechanic helper Non-productive shop labor - vacation/sick leave Shop labor not identified with specific maintenance projects SCHEDULE P-6 -2- SALARIES AND RELATED FRINGE BENEFITS LINE 6 Aircraft & Traffic Handling Personnel Analyst - procedures Baggage clerk Baggage handler Cargo clerk Cargo handler Cashier - ticket office Chauffeur - passenger vehicles Cleaner - aircraft Clerk Control tower operator Counterman - airport Counter ticket salesman – city Crew scheduler Doorman - passenger Draftsman - flight control Express agent Flight director Flight dispatcher Flight regulations supervisor Flight specifications supervisor Freight agent Gateman Mail handling clerk Meteorologist Mechanic - line service Passenger ramp agent Passenger sales ticketing clerk Porter - baggage Rates clerk Reservations clerk Reservations manager Refreshing crew Regional manager Secretary Station manager Stenographer Tariff specialist Typist Waybill clerk SCHEDULE P-6 -3- SALARIES AND RELATED FRINGE BENEFITS LINE 7 Other personnel Accountants
    [Show full text]