From Southeastern Oregon David V
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa -
Moths & Butterflies of Grizzly Peak Preserve
2018 ANNUAL REPORT MOTHS & BUTTERFLIES OF GRIZZLY PEAK PRESERVE: Inventory Results from 2018 Prepared and Submi�ed by: DANA ROSS (Entomologist/Lepidoptera Specialist) Corvallis, Oregon SUMMARY The Grizzly Peak Preserve was sampled for butterflies and moths during May, June and October, 2018. A grand total of 218 species were documented and included 170 moths and 48 butterflies. These are presented as an annotated checklist in the appendix of this report. Butterflies and day-flying moths were sampled during daylight hours with an insect net. Nocturnal moths were collected using battery-powered backlight traps over single night periods at 10 locations during each monthly visit. While many of the documented butterflies and moths are common and widespread species, others - that include the Western Sulphur (Colias occidentalis primordialis) and the noctuid moth Eupsilia fringata - represent more locally endemic and/or rare taxa. One geometrid moth has yet to be identified and may represent an undescribed (“new”) species. Future sampling during March, April, July, August and September will capture many more Lepidoptera that have not been recorded. Once the site is more thoroughly sampled, the combined Grizzly Peak butterfly-moth fauna should total at least 450-500 species. INTRODUCTION The Order Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) is an abundant and diverse insect group that performs essential ecological functions within terrestrial environments. As a group, these insects are major herbivores (caterpillars) and pollinators (adults), and are a critical food source for many species of birds, mammals (including bats) and predacious and parasitoid insects. With hundreds of species of butterflies and moths combined occurring at sites with ample habitat heterogeneity, a Lepidoptera inventory can provide a valuable baseline for biodiversity studies. -
6-2 18 April 2005
Volume 6 18 April 2005 Number 2 The Taxonomic Report OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY IMMATURE STAGES OF COLIAS OCCIDENTALIS SULLIVANI FROM OREGON (LEPIDOPTERA: PIERIDAE) JACK HARRY 47 San Rafael Court, West Jordan, UT 84088 ABSTRACT: The immature stages of Colias occidentalis sullivani Hammond and McCorkle are described and figured. The larval host is Lathyrus rigidus White. Additional keywords: alexandra, christina, Harney County, head capsule, larva, ova, pupa. ___________________________________ Colias occidentalis sullivani was described in 2003 by Paul Hammond and Dave McCorkle. The type locality is near Ten Cent Lake in Harney County, Oregon. The immature stages reared in this study were from the type locality. MATERIALS AND METHODS Oviposition: Three females were observed ovipositing on L. rigidus. All three eggs were placed on or near new growth at the ends of the plant stems. Therefore, the newly hatched larvae would have tender growth readily available. Sprigs of the hostplant were put into water in a small container and then placed inside a gallon size plastic container with a chiffon cover. Females collected at the type locality in May 2002 were put into the gallon container for ovipositing. At first, indirect sunlight was tried but the females did not respond by ovipositing. Some Colias species will oviposit under incandescent light but the sullivani females did not. When the container was placed in direct sunlight, about 100 eggs were readily obtained. Each was oviposited singly on leaves of the larval hostplant. Care was taken to not let the container overheat. The sprigs remained in water and the eggs were left in place until shortly before hatching. -
Lepidoptera: Pieridae
Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(2): 600-604 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2017; 5(2): 600-604 Life cycle of nilgiri clouded yellow Colias © 2017 JEZS Received: 16-01-2017 nilagiriensis C. & R. Felder [Lepidoptera: Pieridae] Accepted: 17-02-2017 Udhagamandalam, the Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu Jeevith S The Wynter Blyth Association, #7D Plains View Garden, Tiger Jeevith S and S Manoj Hill, Coonoor, The Nilgiris – 643 101, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract S Manoj The life cycle of Nilgiri Clouded Yellow butterfly Colias nilagiriensis C. & R. Felder, larval The Wynter Blyth Association, performance and life cycle on its new host plant Trifolium repens L. family Fabaceae was recorded and #7D Plains View Garden, Tiger described for the first time. The study was carried out during post monsoon in the year 2016 at Hill, Coonoor, The Nilgiris – 643 Udhagamandalam, the Nilgiris district, Tamil Nadu. Fresh eggs of Nilgiri Clouded Yellow were collected 101, Tamil Nadu, India from its host plant. Colias nilagiriensis completed its life cycle from egg to adult in 55-62 days. The larvae stage lasted 24-26 days followed pupa stage which lasted for 20-25 days. Keywords: Life cycle, Colias nilagiriensis, Trifolium repens, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris 1. Introduction The genus Colias Fabricius, 1807 is usually difficult to reach a taxonomic decision on [1] phenotypic difference . Colias nilagiriensis C. & R. Felder Nilgiri Clouded Yellow belongs to the whites and yellows family Pieridae and sub-family Coliadinae. It is a small butterfly endemic to Southern Western Ghats of India at an elevation 1,900 m above [2]. -
Papilio Series) 2006
(NEW April 28 PAPILIO SERIES) 2006 TAXONOMIC STUDIES AND NEW TAXA OF NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott (also editor), Michael S. Fisher, Norbert G. Kondla, Steve Kohler, Crispin S. Guppy, Stephen M. Spomer, and B. Chris Schmidt Abstract. New diversity is reported and discussed among North American butterflies. Several dozen new taxa are named. A new "sibling" species has been found to occur throughout the Rocky Mts., introducing a new butterfly species to most states in western U.S. and to southern Alberta and BC. Several taxa of Colias, Euphydryas, Lycaena, and Plebejus are raised to species status. Many nam.e changes are made, and many taxa are switched between species to create several dozen new combinations. The relevance of species concepts to difficult groups of butterflies is explored. Introduction This paper consists of miscellaneous taxonomic studies on North American butterflies, some in the northeast, but mostly in the west. Most of the diversity of butterfly fauna in North America is in the western mountainous areas, where the human population is lower, so it has taken longer to study western butterflies, and a lot more study is needed. We have made new findings on many wes.tern butterflies, and this progress is reported below. And Scott recently moved his collection out of old dermestid-infested drawers into fine very-tight ones that those beetles cannot enter, and in the process of resorting them found a dozen unnamed subspecies, which are named below. As we study our butterflies and learn more and more about them, a disturbing pattern has emerged. -
Book Review, of Systematics of Western North American Butterflies
(NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) ~19 2008 CORRECTIONS/REVIEWS OF 58 NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY BOOKS Dr. James A. Scott, 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226-1254 Abstract. Corrections are given for 58 North American butterfly books. Most of these books are recent. Misidentified figures mostly of adults, erroneous hostplants, and other mistakes are corrected in each book. Suggestions are made to improve future butterfly books. Identifications of figured specimens in Holland's 1931 & 1898 Butterfly Book & 1915 Butterfly Guide are corrected, and their type status clarified, and corrections are made to F. M. Brown's series of papers on Edwards; types (many figured by Holland), because some of Holland's 75 lectotype designations override lectotype specimens that were designated later, and several dozen Holland lectotype designations are added to the J. Pelham Catalogue. Type locality designations are corrected/defined here (some made by Brown, most by others), for numerous names: aenus, artonis, balder, bremnerii, brettoides, brucei (Oeneis), caespitatis, cahmus, callina, carus, colon, colorado, coolinensis, comus, conquista, dacotah, damei, dumeti, edwardsii (Oarisma), elada, epixanthe, eunus, fulvia, furcae, garita, hermodur, kootenai, lagus, mejicanus, mormo, mormonia, nilus, nympha, oreas, oslari, philetas, phylace, pratincola, rhena, saga, scudderi, simius, taxiles, uhleri. Five first reviser actions are made (albihalos=austinorum, davenporti=pratti, latalinea=subaridum, maritima=texana [Cercyonis], ricei=calneva). The name c-argenteum is designated nomen oblitum, faunus a nomen protectum. Three taxa are demonstrated to be invalid nomina nuda (blackmorei, sulfuris, svilhae), and another nomen nudum ( damei) is added to catalogues as a "schizophrenic taxon" in order to preserve stability. Problems caused by old scientific names and the time wasted on them are discussed. -
Sentinels on the Wing: the Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada
Sentinels on the Wing The Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada Peter W. Hall Foreword In Canada, our ties to the land are strong and deep. Whether we have viewed the coasts of British Columbia or Cape Breton, experienced the beauty of the Arctic tundra, paddled on rivers through our sweeping boreal forests, heard the wind in the prairies, watched caribou swim the rivers of northern Labrador, or searched for song birds in the hardwood forests of south eastern Canada, we all call Canada our home and native land. Perhaps because Canada’s landscapes are extensive and cover a broad range of diverse natural systems, it is easy for us to assume the health of our important natural spaces and the species they contain. Our country seems so vast compared to the number of Canadians that it is difficult for us to imagine humans could have any lasting effect on nature. Yet emerging science demonstrates that our natural systems and the species they contain are increas- ingly at risk. While the story is by no means complete, key indicator species demonstrate that Canada’s natural legacy is under pressure from a number of sources, such as the conversion of lands for human uses, the release of toxic chemicals, the introduction of new, invasive species or the further spread of natural pests, and a rapidly changing climate. These changes are hitting home and, with the globalization and expansion of human activities, it is clear the pace of change is accelerating. While their flights of fancy may seem insignificant, butterflies are sentinels or early indicators of this change, and can act as important messengers to raise awareness. -
USGS DDS-43, Status of Butterflies
ARTHUR M. SHAPIRO Center for Population Biology University of California Davis, California 27 Status of Butterflies ABSTRACT alpine fell fields). Most of the Sierra is forested, yet most of its butterfly diversity is not found in the forest—a fact first noted The Sierra Nevada has an unusually rich butterfly fauna that, how- by Emmel and Emmel (1963b). ever, is distinguished by little endemism at either species or subspe- Butterflies are important for biodiversity and conservation cies levels. This may change soon, as more taxonomic subspecies biology because they are diverse enough that patterns in dis- are named. The fauna is structured altitudinally, latitudinally, and be- tribution and diversity are demonstrable; their taxonomy is tween east and west slopes. Maximum species richness occurs at in relatively good shape, at least compared with that of most middle elevations on the west slope and around lower passes. En- other invertebrates; they include both ecological generalists demism and relictualism are concentrated at high elevation (subal- and specialists, with some of these specialists tied to unusual pine and alpine) and on unusual soils at lower elevations. Some patterns and/or endangered habitats; they often have close and poten- of endemism and relictualism suggest a very dynamic biogeography tially coevolved relationships with larval host plants and some- in the Quaternary period, further supported by phylogeographic (ge- times with adult nectar sources; they are relatively easy to study netic) studies. The historic butterfly record is so poor that the effects of and are large enough to be marked individually (and are iden- land use and management on the fauna can only be guessed at. -
Butterflies and Moths of Pacific Northwest Forests and Woodlands: Rare, Endangered, and Management- Sensitive Species
he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private TForestry, USDA Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ United States Depart- US Forest US Forest Service ment of Agriculture Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Cover design Chuck Benedict. Photo, Taylor’s Checkerspot, Euphydryas editha taylori. Photo by Dana Ross. See page 38. For copies of this publication, contact: Dr. Jeffrey C. Miller Richard Reardon Oregon State University FHTET, USDA Forest Service Department of Rangeland Ecology 180 Canfield Street and Management Morgantown, WV 26505 202 Strand Agriculture Hall 304-285-1566 Corvallis, Washington, USA [email protected] 97331-2218 FAX 541-737-0504 Phone 541-737-5508 [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program informa- tion (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Inde- pendence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). -
Exotics As Host Plants of the California Butterfly Fauna
Biological Conservation 110 (2003) 413–433 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna Sherri D. Gravesa,*, Arthur M. Shapirob a1430 Castec Drive, Sacramento, CA 95864, USA bCenter for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Received 22 August 2001; accepted 1 July 2002 Abstract Introduced species may impact native species and communities in many ways. One which has received relatively little attention is by serving as resources for natives, thereby altering their ecology. We address such impacts on the California butterfly fauna as currently understood. Eighty-two of California’s approximately 236 butterfly species (34%) are reported as ovipositing or feeding on introduced plant taxa. Many more utilize introduced plants as nectar sources. Interactions with introduced plant taxa are not distributed evenly among butterfly species. Alpine and desert butterflies interact with relatively few introduced plants because few exotic plant species have reached and successfully colonized these habitats. Other California butterfly species are specialists on particular plant families or genera with no exotic representatives in California and have thus far failed to recognize any introduced plants as potential foodplants. Some California butterflies have expanded their geographic ranges and/or extended their flight sea- sons by feeding on exotic plants. However, negative impacts of exotic plant species can also occur. At least three of the state’s butterfly species currently lay eggs on introduced taxa that are toxic to larvae. Impacts of introduced plant taxa on California’s butterflies are expected to increase as both habitat conversion and alien introductions accelerate. # 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. -
Final Report on Umatilla National Forest Surveys for the Intermountain Sulphur Butterfly (Colias Occidentalis Pseudochristina = Colias Christina Pseudochristina)
Final report on Umatilla National Forest surveys for the Intermountain sulphur butterfly (Colias occidentalis pseudochristina = Colias christina pseudochristina) Assistance agreement L08AC13768, Modification 4 Field work, background research, and report completed by Alexa Carleton, Lori Ann Burd, Sarina Jepsen, and Sarah Foltz Jordan, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation October 8, 2012 1 Table of Contents Summary ….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Introduction …….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Survey protocol …….………..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Sites surveyed and survey results …..…….…………………………………………………………………………………..8 Mallory Ridge sites …………………………………………………………………………………………….8, 15, 17 Smoothing Iron and Park Ridge sites ……………………………………………………………………….…..10 Wenaha-Tucannon sites ……………………………………………………………………………………………...13 Wallowa River Wayside ………………………………………………………………………………………….……19 Potential future survey work…………….……………………………………………………………………………………..20 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..21 References .…………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….21 Appendix 1: Summary table of sites surveyed …….…………………………………………………………………..22 Appendix II: Maps of sites surveyed ………………………………………………………..………………………………23 2 Summary Alexa Carleton and Lori Ann Burd (Xerces Society) conducted surveys for the intermountain sulphur (Colias occidentalis pseudochristina = Colias christina pseudochristina) in May, 2012 in the Umatilla National Forest of eastern Washington (Pomeroy District). -
Rare, Threatened, and Endangered
Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751, Mail Stop: INR Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9950 http://inr.oregonstate.edu/orbic With assistance from: U.S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NatureServe OregonFlora at Oregon State University The Nature Conservancy Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Department of State Lands Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Agriculture Native Plant Society of Oregon Compiled and published by the following staff at the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center: Jimmy Kagan, Director/Ecologist Sue Vrilakas, Botanist/Data Manager Eleanor Gaines, Zoologist Lindsey Wise, Botanist/Data Manager Michael Russell, Botanist/Ecologist Cayla Sigrah, GIS and Database Support Specialist Cover Photo: Charadrius nivosus (Snowy plover chick and adult). Photo by Cathy Tronquet. ORBIC Street Address: Portland State University, Science and Education Center, 2112 SW Fifth Ave., Suite 140, Portland, Oregon, 97201 ORBIC Mailing Address: Portland State University, Mail Stop: INR, P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 Bibliographic reference to this publication should read: Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2019. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 133 pp. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................