Springerprotocols Trials 2008
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SppgringerProtocols Trials 2008 - 2011: Results of User Surveys - UPDATE - Uta Hauptfleisch Market Intelligence & Web Analytics December 2011 Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 2 Summary 1. Online survey of researchers at institutions taking part in the SpringerProtocol trials in autumn 2008, spring and autumn 2009, 2010, and 2011 2. About 70% find pp(y)rotocols (extremely) relevant for their work 3. More than 20% of respondents have already used SpringerProtocols 4. Positive feedback on SpringerProtocols: 85% of users found them (very) useful 5. Users describe SpringerProtocols as easy to use and accessible, and with detailed instructions that are easy to follow 6. Keyyg advantages of SppgringerProtocols are seen in browsingggg/searching, selecting favorite protocols, viewing of similar protocols and accessibility via major search engines Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 3 Method • Online survey among researchers at academic institutions and companies which participated in the SpringerProtocols trials. • Surveyyypps conducted in November 2008, May 2009, September/October 2009, April and November 2010 and May and November 2011 • Invitation e-mails sent to 5610 researchers at more than190 participating institutions in the US, Canada and worldwide . • 258 completed interviews Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 4 Usage of Laboratory Protocols Have you ever used a protocol to help perform a lab experiment? Yes 52% No 42% Don' know 6% (Base:258 respondents, closed question , Q1) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 5 Frequency of Using Laboratory Protocols How often do you use laboratory protocols in your daily work? More than once a week 36% Once a week 18% Once a month 16% Once every few months 14% Less 16% (Base: 258 respondents , Q2) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 6 Frequency of Searching for Protocols How often do you search for protocols you haven't used before? More than once a week 13% Once a week 14% Once a month 27% Once every few months 29% Less 17% (Base: 258 respondents , Q3) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 7 Relevance of Laboratory Protocols How relevant are protocols for your work? 1-extremely relevant 40% 2 32% 3 17% 4 8% 5-not relevant at all 3% (Base:258 respondents, Q5) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 8 Protocols Products Used Which of the following protocols resources have you used? Your institution/lab' ssown own 73% protocols Current Protocols (Wiley) 39% Nature Protocols (Nature) 33% Protocol-Online.org 23% Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 17% (CSH) Other 11% No answer 3% (Base:133 respondents using protocols, multiple answers possible, Q6) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 9 Usage of Springer's Methods in Molecular Biology Have you ever used protocols from Springer's Methods in Molecular Biology series? Yes 29% No 60% Don' know 11% (Base:258 respondents, Q7) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 10 Usage of SpringerProtocols Have you used SpringerProtocols? Yes 23% No 68% Don' know 9% (Base: 258 respondents, Q8) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 11 Access to SpringerProtocols How did you access SpringerProtocols? springerlink.com 27% springerprotocols.com 29% both 22% don't know 22% (Base: 59 respondents using Springer Protocols, question Q9) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 12 What do you like about SpringerProtocols? What do you like about SpringerProtocols? Sample Statements: “Easy to use.” (Research Scientist, easy, convenient, useful 33% Dalhousie University) accessible, online access 18% “Clear, concise, simple to follow, effective.” (Assistant Professor, Tel detailed instructions, well Aviv University) explained 15% ” Explicit, detailed instruction with a clear 14% lot of ancillary detail.” (Assistant Professor, University of Texas, Medical Branch) easy to follow 14% “Breadth of coverage; includes breadth of coverage 12% older and newer protocols.” (Associate Professor, Wilfrid Laurier University up-to-date, new techniques 11% „Access to up-to-date material, well organized, structured 8% collected for me in one easily accessed place.” (Instructor, other 15% Sylvan Hills High School) (Base: 59 respondents using Springer Protocols, no answer: 7, open-ended question, Q10) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 13 How can SpringerProtocols improve? How can SpringerProtocols improve? Sample Statements: “I find that even with the vast more detailed , clearer 17% amount of protocols Springer still has gaps in their up to date protocols in certain areas. A more cheaper 14% comprehensive search engine would also help.” (Professor, Texas easier navigation, browsing, Tech U nive r sit y) searching 14% “Better pricing so we can get update frequently, add 14% more.” (Research Scientist, George newest technologies Fox University). more comprehensive , “Update frequently.” (Lecturer, content from other areas 11% Columbia University in New York City) other 18% “The key is the indexing and searching engine.” (Ph.D. fine, good as it is 14% candidate, University of Guelph) don't know 6% (Base: 59 respondents using Springer Protocols, no answer:17, open-ended question, Q11) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 14 Rating of Features of SpringerProtocols How attractive do you rate the following features of SpringerProtocols listed below? 1=Very 5= Not attractive 234attractive at all Browse protocols by subject and 1.5 category Select favorite protocols 1.8 Fin d pro toco ls v ia searc h 1.8 engines View similar protocols 1.8 Videos which demonstrate 1.8 procedures Sign-up for protocols alerts 2.1 Upload own protocols to 212.1 personal section Comment on protocols and/or 2.1 read comments by other users Sign-up for RSS feeds 2.4 (Base:59 respondents using Springer Protocols, 5-point-rating, 1=very attractive and 5=not attractive at all,Q12) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 15 Usefulness of Having Access to SpringerProtocols How useful is it for you to have access to SpringerProtocols? 1-very useful 54% 2 31% 3 7% 4 4% 5-not at all useful 0% don't know 4% (Base: 59 respondents using Springer Protocols, 5-point-rating, 1=very useful and 5=not at all useful,Q13) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 16 Quality of SpringerProtocols How would you rate the quality of the individual protocols in SpringerProtocols compared to other resources? 1=quality of SP 5= quality of SP is much better 234is much worse Protocol-Online.org 1.8 Current Protocols (Wiley) 2.0 Nature Protocols (Nature) 2.2 Your institution/lab's own 2.3 protocols Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2.4 (CSH) (Base: 59 respondents using Springer Protocols(SP), 13-24 d.k., 5-point-rating, 1=quality of SP is much better and 5=quality of SP is much worse, Q14) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 17 SpringerProtocols Recommended to Library Would you recommend SpringerProtocols to your library for subscription? Yes 93% No 4% Don' know 3% (Base: 59 respondents using Springer Protocols, Q15) Springer Protocols Trials: Results of User Surveys| December 2011 18 Respondents from more than 190 institutions … • ABB, LLP • EACRI • Kashani Hospital , Iran • Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria • Eastern Michigan University • Kiran Hospital ,Pakistan • Albany Medical College • Environment Canada • Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan • Alexander von Humboldt Universidad Peruana • Escorts Heart Institute and Research Center, • Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, • Alexandria University, Egypt India Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria • Aligarh Muslim University , India • Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Iran • Lebanese American University • All India Institute of Medical Sciences • Federal Institute of Industrial Research • Loma Linda University Oshodi, Lagos, Nigeria • Ankara Numune Education and Research • Los Alamos National Laboratory Hospital, Turkey • Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran • Mangalore University, India • Cayetano Heredia Lima-Peru • Florida International University • Mansoura University, Egypt • Ambo University, Ethiopia • Foundation of Technical Education, Iraq • Masinde Muliro University of Science and • Animal Health Research Institute, Taiwan • George Fox University Technology, Kenia • Applied Biosystems • Georgia Department of Natural Resources • Massachusetts Institute of Technology • Babraham Institute • Georgia Institute of Technology • Medical City Dallas Hospital • Bucknell University • Hazara University, Pakistan • Medical University of South Carolina • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences • Hawassa University, Ethiopia • Memorial University of Newfoundland • Carroll University • Hospital General de Mexico • Memorial Sloan/Kettering Cancer Center • Center for AIDS Intervention Research • Hospital Vozandes Quito, Ecuador • Ministry of Education,Islamabad, Pakistan • Central South University, China • Illinois Institute of Technology • Montana Tech of the University of Montana • Chittagong University, Bangladesh • Indiana University - Purdue University • Morehead State University Indianapolis • City College of New York • Mount Saint Vincent University, Canada • Indiana University School of Medicine • Cleveland Clinic Foundation • Murtala Moh'd Specialist Hospital, Kano, • Iowa