Anti-CLCA1 (C-Terminal Half) Monoclonal Antibody, Clone 5E3.3 (CABT-B1341) This Product Is for Research Use Only and Is Not Intended for Diagnostic Use

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Anti-CLCA1 (C-terminal half) monoclonal antibody, clone 5E3.3 (CABT-B1341) This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. PRODUCT INFORMATION Specificity Detects the 90 kDa processed/cleaved 4-transmembrane glycoprotein, but not the cleaved 37-41 kDa C-terminal fragment. Immunogen GST-tagged recombinant protein corresponding to an internal fragment from the C-terminal half of human CLCA1. Isotype IgG1, κ Source/Host Mouse Species Reactivity Human Clone 5E3.3 Purification Protein G Purified Conjugate Unconjugated Applications WB, IHC Epitope Internal (C-terminal half). Molecular Weight ~83 kDa observed. 125 kDa glycosylated precursor form, 90 kDa and 37-41 kDa processed/cleaved fragements reported. Format Liquid Concentration Please refer to lot specific datasheet. Size 100 μg Buffer 0.1 M Tris-Glycine (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl with 0.05% sodium azide. Preservative 0.05% Sodium Azide Storage Stable for 1 year at 2-8°C from date of receipt. BACKGROUND 45-1 Ramsey Road, Shirley, NY 11967, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: 1-631-624-4882 Fax: 1-631-938-8221 1 © Creative Diagnostics All Rights Reserved Introduction Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator 1 (UniProt A8K7I4; also known as CaCC-1, Calcium-activated chloride channel family member 1, Calcium-activated chloride channel protein 1, hCaCC-1, hCLCA1) is encoded by the CLCA1 (also known as CACC, CACC1, CLCC1, GOB5) gene (Gene ID 1179) in human. CLCA1 belongs to the calcium-activated chloride channel regulator (previously known as chloride channel calcium activated or CLCA) family of self-cleaving, secreted metalloproteases that activate calcium-dependent chloride currents (ICaCC) in mammalian cells. Originally thought to be calcium-activated chloride channels (CaCCs), CLCA proteins were later identified as secreted CaCCs modulators. TMEM16A (a.k.a. Anoctamin1 and DOG1) is a CaCC expressed in airway epithelia and smooth muscle. The secreted CLCA1 is reported to physically interact with TMEM16A and modulate TMEM16A- dependent calcium-activated chloride currents. Adding CLCA1 to cells causes more TMEM16A channels to appear in the cell membrane, which increases the flow of chloride ions. GENE INFORMATION Entrez Gene ID 1179 UniProt ID A8K7I4 45-1 Ramsey Road, Shirley, NY 11967, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: 1-631-624-4882 Fax: 1-631-938-8221 2 © Creative Diagnostics All Rights Reserved.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
[Show full text]
Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
[Show full text]
Supplementary Material
BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Page 1 / 45 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Appendix A1: Neuropsychological protocol. Appendix A2: Description of the four cases at the transitional stage. Table A1: Clinical status and center proportion in each batch. Table A2: Complete output from EdgeR. Table A3: List of the putative target genes. Table A4: Complete output from DIANA-miRPath v.3. Table A5: Comparison of studies investigating miRNAs from brain samples. Figure A1: Stratified nested cross-validation. Figure A2: Expression heatmap of miRNA signature. Figure A3: Bootstrapped ROC AUC scores. Figure A4: ROC AUC scores with 100 different fold splits. Figure A5: Presymptomatic subjects probability scores. Figure A6: Heatmap of the level of enrichment in KEGG pathways. Kmetzsch V, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92:485–493. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324647 BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Appendix A1. Neuropsychological protocol The PREV-DEMALS cognitive evaluation included standardized neuropsychological tests to investigate all cognitive domains, and in particular frontal lobe functions. The scores were provided previously (Bertrand et al., 2018). Briefly, global cognitive efficiency was evaluated by means of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). Frontal executive functions were assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), forward and backward digit spans, Trail Making Test part A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Symbol-Digit Modalities test.
[Show full text]
Transcriptomic Uniqueness and Commonality of the Ion Channels and Transporters in the Four Heart Chambers Sanda Iacobas1, Bogdan Amuzescu2 & Dumitru A
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Transcriptomic uniqueness and commonality of the ion channels and transporters in the four heart chambers Sanda Iacobas1, Bogdan Amuzescu2 & Dumitru A. Iacobas3,4* Myocardium transcriptomes of left and right atria and ventricles from four adult male C57Bl/6j mice were profled with Agilent microarrays to identify the diferences responsible for the distinct functional roles of the four heart chambers. Female mice were not investigated owing to their transcriptome dependence on the estrous cycle phase. Out of the quantifed 16,886 unigenes, 15.76% on the left side and 16.5% on the right side exhibited diferential expression between the atrium and the ventricle, while 5.8% of genes were diferently expressed between the two atria and only 1.2% between the two ventricles. The study revealed also chamber diferences in gene expression control and coordination. We analyzed ion channels and transporters, and genes within the cardiac muscle contraction, oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, calcium and adrenergic signaling pathways. Interestingly, while expression of Ank2 oscillates in phase with all 27 quantifed binding partners in the left ventricle, the percentage of in-phase oscillating partners of Ank2 is 15% and 37% in the left and right atria and 74% in the right ventricle. The analysis indicated high interventricular synchrony of the ion channels expressions and the substantially lower synchrony between the two atria and between the atrium and the ventricle from the same side. Starting with crocodilians, the heart pumps the blood through the pulmonary circulation and the systemic cir- culation by the coordinated rhythmic contractions of its upper lef and right atria (LA, RA) and lower lef and right ventricles (LV, RV).
[Show full text]
Supplementary Data
Supplementary Fig. 1 A B Responder_Xenograft_ Responder_Xenograft_ NON- NON- Lu7336, Vehicle vs Lu7466, Vehicle vs Responder_Xenograft_ Responder_Xenograft_ Sagopilone, Welch- Sagopilone, Welch- Lu7187, Vehicle vs Lu7406, Vehicle vs Test: 638 Test: 600 Sagopilone, Welch- Sagopilone, Welch- Test: 468 Test: 482 Responder_Xenograft_ NON- Lu7860, Vehicle vs Responder_Xenograft_ Sagopilone, Welch - Lu7558, Vehicle vs Test: 605 Sagopilone, Welch- Test: 333 Supplementary Fig. 2 Supplementary Fig. 3 Supplementary Figure S1. Venn diagrams comparing probe sets regulated by Sagopilone treatment (10mg/kg for 24h) between individual models (Welsh Test ellipse p-value<0.001 or 5-fold change). A Sagopilone responder models, B Sagopilone non-responder models. Supplementary Figure S2. Pathway analysis of genes regulated by Sagopilone treatment in responder xenograft models 24h after Sagopilone treatment by GeneGo Metacore; the most significant pathway map representing cell cycle/spindle assembly and chromosome separation is shown, genes upregulated by Sagopilone treatment are marked with red thermometers. Supplementary Figure S3. GeneGo Metacore pathway analysis of genes differentially expressed between Sagopilone Responder and Non-Responder models displaying –log(p-Values) of most significant pathway maps. Supplementary Tables Supplementary Table 1. Response and activity in 22 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenograft models after treatment with Sagopilone and other cytotoxic agents commonly used in the management of NSCLC Tumor Model Response type
[Show full text]
What Biologists Want from Their Chloride Reporters
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2020) 133, jcs240390. doi:10.1242/jcs.240390 REVIEW SUBJECT COLLECTION: TOOLS IN CELL BIOLOGY What biologists want from their chloride reporters – a conversation between chemists and biologists Matthew Zajac1,2, Kasturi Chakraborty1,2,3, Sonali Saha4,*, Vivek Mahadevan5,*, Daniel T. Infield6, Alessio Accardi7,8,9, Zhaozhu Qiu10,11 and Yamuna Krishnan1,2,‡ ABSTRACT inhibitory synaptic action potential (Kaila et al., 2014; Medina − + − Impaired chloride transport affects diverse processes ranging from et al., 2014). Under normal conditions, [Cl ]i is kept low by a K -Cl SLC12A5 neuron excitability to water secretion, which underlie epilepsy and cotransporter (KCC2, encoded by the gene ), allowing γ cystic fibrosis, respectively. The ability to image chloride fluxes with activation of the -aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor (GABAAR) fluorescent probes has been essential for the investigation of the roles to drive chloride down the electrochemical gradient into the neuron of chloride channels and transporters in health and disease. Therefore, (Doyon et al., 2016). Improper chloride homeostasis is therefore developing effective fluorescent chloride reporters is critical to associated with several severe neurological disorders and epilepsies characterizing chloride transporters and discovering new ones. (Ben-Ari et al., 2012; Huberfeld et al., 2007; Payne et al., 2003). In However, each chloride channel or transporter has a unique epithelial cells, the chloride channel
[Show full text]
CLCC1 (NM 001048210) Human Tagged ORF Clone – RC213260
OriGene Technologies, Inc. 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200 Rockville, MD 20850, US Phone: +1-888-267-4436 [email protected] EU: [email protected] CN: [email protected] Product datasheet for RC213260 CLCC1 (NM_001048210) Human Tagged ORF Clone Product data: Product Type: Expression Plasmids Product Name: CLCC1 (NM_001048210) Human Tagged ORF Clone Tag: Myc-DDK Symbol: CLCC1 Synonyms: MCLC; RP32 Vector: pCMV6-Entry (PS100001) E. coli Selection: Kanamycin (25 ug/mL) Cell Selection: Neomycin This product is to be used for laboratory only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic use. View online » ©2021 OriGene Technologies, Inc., 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200, Rockville, MD 20850, US 1 / 4 CLCC1 (NM_001048210) Human Tagged ORF Clone – RC213260 ORF Nucleotide >RC213260 representing NM_001048210 Sequence: Red=Cloning site Blue=ORF Green=Tags(s) TTTTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGGCCGGGAATTCGTCGACTGGATCCGGTACCGAGGAGATCTGCC GCCGCGATCGCC ATGCTGTGTTCTTTGCTCCTTTGTGAATGTCTGTTGCTGGTAGCTGGTTATGCTCATGATGATGACTGGA TTGACCCCACAGACATGCTTAACTATGATGCTGCTTCAGGAACAATGAGAAAATCTCAGGCAAAATATGG TATTTCAGGGGAAAAGGATGTCAGTCCTGACTTGTCATGTGCTGATGAAATATCAGAATGTTATCACAAA CTTGATTCTTTAACTTATAAGATTGATGAGTGTGAAAAGAAAAAGAGGGAAGACTATGAAAGTCAAAGCA ATCCTGTTTTTAGGAGATACTTAAATAAGATTTTAATTGAAGCTGGAAAGCTTGGACTTCCTGATGAAAA CAAAGGCGATATGCATTATGATGCTGAGATTATCCTTAAAAGAGAAACTTTGTTAGAAATACAGAAGTTT CTCAATGGAGAAGACTGGAAACCAGGTGCCTTGGATGATGCACTAAGTGATATTTTAATTAATTTTAAGT TTCATGATTTTGAAACATGGAAGTGGCGATTCGAAGATTCCTTTGGAGTGGATCCATATAATGTGTTAAT GGTACTTCTTTGTCTGCTCTGCATCGTGGTTTTAGTGGCTACCGAGCTGTGGACATATGTACGTTGGTAC
[Show full text]
Overview Gene List Target Scan Vs DIANA Group a Group B Group A
Overview Gene list Target scan vs DIANA Group A Group B Group A hsa-miR-181a hsa-miR-323 hsa-miR-326 Target scan Diana microT Overlap Target scan Diana microT Overlap Target scan SEPT3 SEPT3 SEPT3 SEPT7 ADARB1 HPCAL4 ABHD2 ABL2 ABHD13 ACVR2A ADCYAP1R1 AKAP13 PDPK1 ACRBP ACAN ABI1 ADAMTS1 ALAD APOBR ACVRL1 ACCN2 ABLIM1 ADAMTSL1 ANKRD52 ATXN1 ADAM19 ACER3 ACSL1 AKAP7 ARID2 C18orf23,RNF165 ADAM33 ACVR2A ACTN2 ANKRD43 ARL3 C20orf29 ADAMTS2 ADAMTS1 ACVR2A AP1S3 ARRB1 CACNG4 AHCYL2 ADAMTS18 ACVR2B ARID2 BBC3 CCNJL ALOX15B ADAMTS5 ADAM11 ATP11A BTG1 CYP2E1 ANK1 ADAMTSL1 ADAM22 ATXN1 C18orf62 GNB1L ANKS6 ADARB1 ADAMTS1 B4GALT1 C1orf21 GPR61 APBA1 AFAP1 ADAMTS6 BAG4 CADM4 GTSE1 ARCN1 AFTPH ADAMTSL1 BAI3 CALML4 HPCAL4 ARHGEF37 AK3 ADCY9 BNC2 CAPN6 KIAA0152 ARID3B AKAP7 ADRBK1 BRD1 CBFA2T2 KIF1A ARL8A ANAPC16 AFF2 BRWD1 CEBPA MACF1 ATP2B2 ANK1 AHCTF1,AHCTF1PBTBD3 CHD1 MYO1D ATP6V1G2 ANKRD12 AKAP2,PALM2 C13orf23 CIT PCNT AUP1 ANKRD33B AKAP6 C14orf43 CLASP2 PDPK1 BCL2L2 ANKRD43 AKAP7 CAPRIN1 CLCN5 PLEKHG4B BHLHE40 ANKRD44 AKAP9 CARM1 CLIP3 PPARA BTBD3 ANKRD52 AKT3 CBX4 COL5A2 PRB1,PRB2,PRB4 BTRC AP1S3 ALG9 CCDC117 CTNS PTPRT C10orf26 APBA1 ANKRD13C CCNJ DCTN4 PYCR1 C14orf1 APLP2 ANKRD20B CDH13 DCUN1D4 RAPGEF1 C16orf45 APOO ANKRD43 CDON DDB1 SRCAP C16orf54 ARID2 ANKRD50 CDYL DDX39B TMEM63C C1orf106 ARL3 AP1G1 CEP350 DIP2C C1orf27 ARRDC3 AP1S3 CHD7 DNAJB3 C22orf29 ATF7 API5 CHIC1 EEPD1 C9orf3 ATG2B ARFGEF2 CLIP1 EIF2C1 CACNA1E ATG7 ARHGAP12 CNOT6L ELFN2 CAPN12 ATP11A ARHGAP26 CNR1 ELK1 CASKIN1 ATP2B3 ARHGAP29 CNTN4 FAM172A CBFA2T3 ATP8B2 ARHGEF3 CNTNAP2
[Show full text]
Downregulation of Carnitine Acyl-Carnitine Translocase by Mirnas
Page 1 of 288 Diabetes 1 Downregulation of Carnitine acyl-carnitine translocase by miRNAs 132 and 212 amplifies glucose-stimulated insulin secretion Mufaddal S. Soni1, Mary E. Rabaglia1, Sushant Bhatnagar1, Jin Shang2, Olga Ilkayeva3, Randall Mynatt4, Yun-Ping Zhou2, Eric E. Schadt6, Nancy A.Thornberry2, Deborah M. Muoio5, Mark P. Keller1 and Alan D. Attie1 From the 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; 2Department of Metabolic Disorders-Diabetes, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey; 3Sarah W. Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Duke Institute of Molecular Physiology, 5Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Durham, North Carolina. 4Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University system, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; 6Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York. Corresponding author Alan D. Attie, 543A Biochemistry Addition, 433 Babcock Drive, Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, (608) 262-1372 (Ph), (608) 263-9608 (fax), [email protected]. Running Title: Fatty acyl-carnitines enhance insulin secretion Abstract word count: 163 Main text Word count: 3960 Number of tables: 0 Number of figures: 5 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online June 26, 2014 Diabetes Page 2 of 288 2 ABSTRACT We previously demonstrated that micro-RNAs 132 and 212 are differentially upregulated in response to obesity in two mouse strains that differ in their susceptibility to obesity-induced diabetes. Here we show the overexpression of micro-RNAs 132 and 212 enhances insulin secretion (IS) in response to glucose and other secretagogues including non-fuel stimuli. We determined that carnitine acyl-carnitine translocase (CACT, Slc25a20) is a direct target of these miRNAs.
[Show full text]
Supplemental Table 1A. Differential Gene Expression Profile of Adehcd40l and Adehnull Treated Cells Vs Untreated Cells
Supplemental Table 1a. Differential Gene Expression Profile of AdEHCD40L and AdEHNull treated cells vs Untreated Cells Fold change Regulation Fold change Regulation ([AdEHCD40L] vs ([AdEHCD40L] ([AdEHNull] vs ([AdEHNull] vs Probe Set ID [Untreated]) vs [Untreated]) [Untreated]) [Untreated]) Gene Symbol Gene Title RefSeq Transcript ID NM_001039468 /// NM_001039469 /// NM_004954 /// 203942_s_at 2.02 down 1.00 down MARK2 MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 NM_017490 217985_s_at 2.09 down 1.00 down BAZ1A fibroblastbromodomain growth adjacent factor receptorto zinc finger 2 (bacteria-expressed domain, 1A kinase, keratinocyte NM_013448 /// NM_182648 growth factor receptor, craniofacial dysostosis 1, Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer 203638_s_at 2.10 down 1.01 down FGFR2 syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome) NM_000141 /// NM_022970 1570445_a_at 2.07 down 1.01 down LOC643201 hypothetical protein LOC643201 XM_001716444 /// XM_001717933 /// XM_932161 231763_at 3.05 down 1.02 down POLR3A polymerase (RNA) III (DNA directed) polypeptide A, 155kDa NM_007055 1555368_x_at 2.08 down 1.04 down ZNF479 zinc finger protein 479 NM_033273 /// XM_001714591 /// XM_001719979 241627_x_at 2.15 down 1.05 down FLJ10357 hypothetical protein FLJ10357 NM_018071 223208_at 2.17 down 1.06 down KCTD10 potassium channel tetramerisation domain containing 10 NM_031954 219923_at 2.09 down 1.07 down TRIM45 tripartite motif-containing 45 NM_025188 242772_x_at 2.03 down 1.07 down Transcribed locus 233019_at 2.19 down 1.08 down CNOT7 CCR4-NOT transcription complex, subunit 7 NM_013354
[Show full text]
Supplemental Table 1: Expression of the Probe Set Ids That Characterize MUC1-CD
Supplemental Table 1: Expression of the probe set IDs that characterize MUC1-CD- induced tumorigenesis and designation of a 93-gene subset prognostic in breast and lung cancers. Ratio = in vivo / in vitro. PS = 93-gene prognostic subset. Probe Set ID Gene Symbol Ratio PS Description 1383355_at ABCA1 0.429 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 1 1379402_at ABCC4 0.473 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4 1382137_at ABHD3 0.075 abhydrolase domain containing 3 1372462_at ACAT2 0.155 * acetyl-Coenzyme A acetyltransferase 2 (acetoacetyl Coenzyme A thiolase) 1367854_at ACLY 0.47 ATP citrate lyase 1370939_at ACSL1 0.201 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1 1368177_at ACSL3 0.275 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 1369928_at ACTA1 1230.193 actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle 1398836_s_at ACTB 2.378 * actin, beta 1389785_at ACY3 19.369 aspartoacylase (aminocyclase) 3 1370071_at ADA 2.259 * adenosine deaminase 1368021_at ADH1C 0.274 alcohol dehydrogenase 1C (class I), gamma polypeptide 1369711_at AGTR2 4.292 angiotensin II receptor, type 2 1398288_at AGTR2 7.511 angiotensin II receptor, type 2 1368558_s_at AIF1 1036.083 * allograft inflammatory factor 1 1388924_at ANGPTL4 2.191 angiopoietin-like 4 1386344_at ANKH 2.936 * ankylosis, progressive homolog (mouse) 1393439_a_at ANKH 3.117 * ankylosis, progressive homolog (mouse) 1369249_at ANKH 3.194 * ankylosis, progressive homolog (mouse) 1385709_x_at ANKH 3.615 * ankylosis, progressive homolog (mouse) 1367664_at ANKRD1 0.096 ankyrin repeat domain 1
[Show full text]
Research Article Complex and Multidimensional Lipid Raft Alterations in a Murine Model of Alzheimer’S Disease
SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease Volume 2010, Article ID 604792, 56 pages doi:10.4061/2010/604792 Research Article Complex and Multidimensional Lipid Raft Alterations in a Murine Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Wayne Chadwick, 1 Randall Brenneman,1, 2 Bronwen Martin,3 and Stuart Maudsley1 1 Receptor Pharmacology Unit, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Suite 100, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA 2 Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33124, USA 3 Metabolism Unit, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Suite 100, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Stuart Maudsley, [email protected] Received 17 May 2010; Accepted 27 July 2010 Academic Editor: Gemma Casadesus Copyright © 2010 Wayne Chadwick et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Various animal models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been created to assist our appreciation of AD pathophysiology, as well as aid development of novel therapeutic strategies. Despite the discovery of mutated proteins that predict the development of AD, there are likely to be many other proteins also involved in this disorder. Complex physiological processes are mediated by coherent interactions of clusters of functionally related proteins. Synaptic dysfunction is one of the hallmarks of AD. Synaptic proteins are organized into multiprotein complexes in high-density membrane structures, known as lipid rafts. These microdomains enable coherent clustering of synergistic signaling proteins.
[Show full text]