DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin State Forests Continuous Forest Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wisconsin State Forests Continuous Forest Inventory Wisconsin State Forests Continuous Forest Inventory VOLUME I: FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS Version 4.0 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry October 2016 Wisconsin State Forests Continuous Forest Inventory Field Guide, Version 4.0 October 2016 Note to User: Wisconsin State Forests, Continuous Forest Inventory (WisCFI), Version 4.0 is adapted from the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Northern Region (NRS) field guide version 7.0.1 and NRS FIA version 7.0.1 is based on the National Core Field Guide, Version 7.0. All data elements are national unless indicated as follows: National data elements that end in “+N” (e.g., x.x+N) have had values, codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional regional text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as a “NRS Note.” All regional data elements end in “N” (e.g., x.xN). The text for a regional data element is not hi-lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. National CORE data elements or procedures with light gray text are not applicable in the North. NRS electronic file notes: o hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. National data elements that end in “+WisCFI” (e.g., x.x+WisCFI) have had values, codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional WisCFI text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as a “WisCFI Note.” All WisCFI-specific data elements end in “N-WisCFI” (e.g., x.xN-WisCFI). The text for WisCFI elements is not hi-lighted. WisCFI field guide electronic file notes: o National and regional FIA data elements formatted as light gray hidden text are not applicable for WisCFI. 1 Wisconsin State Forests Continuous Forest Inventory Field Guide, Version 4.0 October 2016 INTRODUCTION+WISCFI .......................................................................................................................... 10 Field Guide Layout ................................................................................................................................. 10 Units of Measure .................................................................................................................................... 11 0.0+N+WISCFI GENERAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 12 0.1+N Plot Setup .................................................................................................................................. 13 0.2 Plot Integrity ................................................................................................................................. 13 1.0 PLOT LEVEL DATA ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.0.1N+WisCFI CYCLE [CYCL] ....................................................................................................... 16 1.0.2N SUB-CYCLE [SUBC] ......................................................................................................... 16 1.1+N+WisCFI STATE [ST] ................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.1N UNIT [UNIT] ....................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.2N-WisCFI STATE FOREST PROPERTY CODE [STFORPROP] ........................................... 17 1.2+N COUNTY [CNTY] ...................................................................................................................... 17 1.3+N PLOT NUMBER [PLT#] ............................................................................................................ 17 1.4+N PLOT STATUS [STAT] ............................................................................................................. 17 1.5+N NONFOREST SAMPLING STATUS......................................................................................... 18 1.6 NONFOREST PLOT STATUS Not Collected in NRS ................................................................. 18 1.7+WisCFI PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON [REAS] ......................................................................... 18 1.8 NONFOREST PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON Not Collected in NRS ...................................... 19 1.9+N SUBPLOTS EXAMINED [EXAM] ............................................................................................. 19 1.10+N+WisCFI SAMPLE KIND [SK] .................................................................................................... 19 1.10.1N PHASE .............................................................................................................................. 20 1.11 PREVIOUS PLOT NUMBER [PRV#] .......................................................................................... 20 1.12+WisCFI FIELD GUIDE VERSION ................................................................................................. 20 1.13+N Current and Previous Date .................................................................................................... 21 1.13.1 YEAR [YEAR] .................................................................................................................... 21 1.13.2 MONTH [MONT] ................................................................................................................ 21 1.13.3 DAY [DAY] ......................................................................................................................... 21 1.13.4N PREVIOUS YEAR [PYEAR] ............................................................................................. 21 1.13.5N PREVIOUS MONTH [PMON] ........................................................................................... 22 1.14 DECLINATION [DECL] (CORE OPTIONAL) Not Collected in NRS ........................................... 22 1.15+N HORIZONTAL DISTANCE TO IMPROVED ROAD [RDIS] .................................................. 22 1.16+N WATER ON PLOT [WTYP] ................................................................................................... 22 1.17 QA STATUS [QAST] ................................................................................................................... 23 1.18 CREW NUMBER [CRW1, CRW2, CRW3, CRW4, CRW5] ........................................................ 23 1.18.1N QA SCORE [QASC] ......................................................................................................... 23 1.18.1.1N QA SCORE CREW NUMBER [QCRW1, QCRW2, QCRW3, QCRW4, QCRW5] .... 24 1.18.2N ONE OR TWO PERSON PLOT [CRSZ] ........................................................................... 24 1.18.3N PLOT SEASON [SEAS] .................................................................................................... 24 1.18.4N TRAINING PLOT [TRAN] ................................................................................................. 25 1.18.5N DENIED ACCESS REASON [DARE] Not Collected in WisCFI ........................................ 25 1.19+N GPS Coordinates .................................................................................................................. 25 1.19.1 GPS Unit Settings, Datum, and Coordinate System ......................................................... 25 1.19.2+N Collecting Readings ........................................................................................................ 25 1.19.3+N GPS UNIT [UNIT] ............................................................................................................ 26 1.19.4 GPS SERIAL NUMBER [GPS#] ........................................................................................ 27 1.19.5+N GPS ENTRY METHOD [METH] ..................................................................................... 27 1.19.6 GPS DATUM [DATM] ........................................................................................................ 27 1.19.7+N COORDINATE SYSTEM [COORS] ................................................................................ 27 1.19.8+N Latitude ............................................................................................................................ 28 1.19.8.1 LATITUDE DEGREES [NDEG] ................................................................................... 28 1.19.8.2 LATITUDE MINUTES [NMIN] ..................................................................................... 28 2 Wisconsin State Forests Continuous Forest Inventory Field Guide, Version 4.0 October 2016 1.19.8.3 LATITUDE SECONDS [NSEC] ................................................................................... 29 1.19.9+N Longitude ......................................................................................................................... 29 1.19.9.1 LONGITUDE DEGREES [WDEG] .............................................................................. 29 1.19.9.2 LONGITUDE MINUTES [WMIN] ................................................................................. 29 1.19.9.3 LONGITUDE SECONDS [WSEC]............................................................................... 30 1.19.10 UTM ZONE [ZONE] Not Collected in NRS ........................................................................ 30 1.19.11 EASTING (X) UTM [EAST] Not Collected in NRS ............................................................. 30 1.19.12 NORTHING (Y) UTM [NORT] Not Collected in NRS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thematic Forest Dictionary
    Elżbieta Kloc THEMATIC FOREST DICTIONARY TEMATYCZNY SŁOWNIK LEÂNY Wydano na zlecenie Dyrekcji Generalnej Lasów Państwowych Warszawa 2015 © Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych ul. Grójecka 127 02-124 Warszawa tel. 22 18 55 353 e-mail: [email protected] www.lasy.gov.pl © Elżbieta Kloc Konsultacja merytoryczna: dr inż. Krzysztof Michalec Konsultacja i współautorstwo haseł z zakresu hodowli lasu: dr inż. Maciej Pach Recenzja: dr Ewa Bandura Ilustracje: Bartłomiej Gaczorek Zdjęcia na okładce Paweł Fabijański Korekta Anna Wikło ISBN 978-83-63895-48-8 Projek graficzny i przygotowanie do druku PLUPART Druk i oprawa Ośrodek Rozwojowo-Wdrożeniowy Lasów Państwowych w Bedoniu TABLE OF CONTENTS – SPIS TREÂCI ENGLISH-POLISH THEMATIC FOREST DICTIONARY ANGIELSKO-POLSKI TEMATYCZNY SŁOWNIK LEÂNY OD AUTORKI ................................................... 9 WYKAZ OBJAŚNIEŃ I SKRÓTÓW ................................... 10 PLANTS – ROŚLINY ............................................ 13 1. Taxa – jednostki taksonomiczne .................................. 14 2. Plant classification – klasyfikacja roślin ............................. 14 3. List of forest plant species – lista gatunków roślin leśnych .............. 17 4. List of tree and shrub species – lista gatunków drzew i krzewów ......... 19 5. Plant morphology – morfologia roślin .............................. 22 6. Plant cells, tissues and their compounds – komórki i tkanki roślinne oraz ich części składowe .................. 30 7. Plant habitat preferences – preferencje środowiskowe roślin
    [Show full text]
  • Planting Power ... Formation in Portugal.Pdf
    Promotoren: Dr. F. von Benda-Beckmann Hoogleraar in het recht, meer in het bijzonder het agrarisch recht van de niet-westerse gebieden. Ir. A. van Maaren Emeritus hoogleraar in de boshuishoudkunde. Preface The history of Portugal is, like that of many other countries in Europe, one of deforestation and reafforestation. Until the eighteenth century, the reclamation of land for agriculture, the expansion of animal husbandry (often on communal grazing grounds or baldios), and the increased demand for wood and timber resulted in the gradual disappearance of forests and woodlands. This tendency was reversed only in the nineteenth century, when planting of trees became a scientifically guided and often government-sponsored activity. The reversal was due, on the one hand, to the increased economic value of timber (the market's "invisible hand" raised timber prices and made forest plantation economically attractive), and to the realization that deforestation had severe impacts on the environment. It was no accident that the idea of sustainability, so much in vogue today, was developed by early-nineteenth-century foresters. Such is the common perspective on forestry history in Europe and Portugal. Within this perspective, social phenomena are translated into abstract notions like agricultural expansion, the invisible hand of the market, and the public interest in sustainably-used natural environments. In such accounts, trees can become gifts from the gods to shelter, feed and warm the mortals (for an example, see: O Vilarealense, (Vila Real), 12 January 1961). However, a closer look makes it clear that such a detached account misses one key aspect: forests serve not only public, but also particular interests, and these particular interests correspond to specific social groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Commission Bulletin: Forestry Practice
    HMSO £3.50 net Forestry Commission Bulletin Forestry Commission ARCHIVE Forestry Practice FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN No. 14 FORESTRY PRACTICE A Summary of Methods of Establishing, Maintaining and Harvesting Forest Crops with Advice on Planning and other Management Considerations for Owners, Agents and Foresters Edited by O. N. Blatchford, B.Sc. Forestry Commission LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE © Crown copyright 1978 First published 1933 Ninth Edition 1978 ISBN011 7101508 FOREWORD This latest edition ofForestry Practice sets out to give a comprehensive account of silvicultural practice and forest management in Britain. Since the first edition, the Forestry Commission has produced a large number of Bulletins, Booklets, Forest Records and Leaflets covering very fully a wide variety of forestry matters. Reference is made to these where appropriate so that the reader may supplement the information and guidance given here. Titles given in the bibliography at the end of each chapter are normally available through a library and those currently in print are listed in the Forestry Commission Catalogue of Publications obtainable from the Publications Officer, Forest Research Station, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Famham, Surrey. Research and Development Papers mainly unpriced may be obtained only from that address. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The cover picture and all the photographs are from the Forestry Commission’s photographic collection. Fair drawings of diagrams were made, where appropriate, by J. Williams, the Commission’s Graphics Officer. CONTENTS Chapter 1 SEED SUPPLY AND COLLECTION Page Seed sources . 1 Seed stands 1 Seed orchards 3 Collection of seed 3 Storage of fruit and seeds 3 Conifers . 3 Broadleaved species 3 Seed regulations 3 Bibliography 4 Chapter 2 NURSERY PRACTICE Objectives .
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2016-‐2017 Accountability Report
    AGENCY NAME: South Carolina Forestry Commission AGENCY CODE: P120 SECTION: 043 Fiscal Year 2016-2017 AcCountability Report SUBMISSION FORM The mission of the South Carolina Forestry Commission is to protect, promote, enhance, and nurture the woodlands of SC, and to educate the public about forestry issues, in a manner consistent with achieving the greatest good for its citizens. AGENCY MISSION Across all ownerships, South Carolina’s forest resources are managed sustainably to support an expanding forest products manufacturing industry while providing environmental services such as clean air, clean water, recreation and wildlife habitat. AGENCY VISION Please select yes or no if the agency has any major or minor (internal or external) recommendations that would allow the agency to operate more effectively and efficiently. Yes No RESTRUCTURING RECOMMENDATIONS: ☐ ☒ Please identify your agency’s preferred contacts for this year’s accountability report. Name Phone Email PRIMARY CONTACT: Doug Wood (803) 896-8820 [email protected] SECONDARY CONTACT: Tom Patton (803) 896-8849 [email protected] A-1 AGENCY NAME: South Carolina Forestry Commission AGENCY CODE: P120 SECTION: 043 I have reviewed and approved the enclosed FY 2016-2017 Accountability Report, which is complete and accurate to the extent of my knowledge. AGENCY DIRECTOR (SIGN AND DATE): (TYPE OR PRINT Henry E. “Gene” Kodama NAME): BOARD/CMSN. CHAIR (SIGN AND DATE): (TYPE OR PRINT Walt McPhail NAME): A-2 AGENCY NAME: South Carolina Forestry Commission AGENCY CODE: P120 SECTION: 043 AGENCY’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The SC Forestry Commission was created in 1927 with its General Duties defined in State Code 48-23-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Measurements for Natural Resource Professionals, 2001 Workshop Proceedings
    Natural Resource Network Connecting Research, Teaching and Outreach 2001 Workshop Proceedings Forest Measurements for Natural Resource Professionals Caroline A. Fox Research and Demonstration Forest Hillsborough, NH Sampling & Management of Coarse Woody Debris- October 12 Getting the Most from Your Cruise- October 19 Cruising Hardware & Software for Foresters- November 9 UNH Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, 214 Nesmith Hall, Durham, NH 03824 The Caroline A. Fox Research and Demonstration Forest (Fox Forest) is in Hillsborough, NH. Its focus is applied practical research, demonstration forests, and education and outreach for a variety of audiences. A Workshop Series on Forest Measurements for Natural Resource Professionals was held in the fall of 2001. These proceedings were prepared as a supplement to the workshop. Papers submitted were not peer-reviewed or edited. They were compiled by Karen P. Bennett, Extension Specialist in Forest Resources and Ken Desmarais, Forester with the NH Division of Forests and Lands. Readers who did not attend the workshop are encouraged to contact authors directly for clarifications. Workshop attendees received additional supplemental materials. Sampling and Management for Down Coarse Woody Debris in New England: A Workshop- October 12, 2001 The What and Why of CWD– Mark Ducey, Assistant Professor, UNH Department of Natural Resources New Hampshire’s Logging Efficiency– Ken Desmarais, Forester/ Researcher, Fox State Forest The Regional Level: Characteristics of DDW in Maine, NH and VT– Linda Heath,
    [Show full text]
  • “Catastrophic” Wildfire a New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health by Chad Hanson, Ph.D
    John Muir Project Technical Report 1 • Winter 2010 • www.johnmuirproject.org The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health by Chad Hanson, Ph.D. Contents The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire: A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health 1 Preface 1 Executive Summary 4 Myths and Facts 6 Myth/Fact 1: Forest fire and home protection 6 Myth/Fact 2: Ecological effects of high-intensity fire 7 Myth/Fact 3: Forest fire intensity 12 Myth/Fact 4: Forest regeneration after high-intensity fire 13 Myth/Fact 5: Forest fire extent 14 Myth/Fact 6: Climate change and fire activity 17 Myth/Fact 7: Dead trees and forest health 19 Myth/Fact 8: Particulate emissions from high-intensity fire 20 Myth/Fact 9: Forest fire and carbon sequestration 20 Myth/Fact 10: “Thinning” and carbon sequestration 22 Myth/Fact 11: Biomass extraction from forests 23 Summary: For Ecologically “Healthy Forests”, We Need More Fire and Dead Trees, Not Less. 24 References 26 Photo Credits 30 Recommended Citation 30 Contact 30 About the Author 30 The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health ii The Myth of “Catastrophic” Wildfire: A New Ecological Paradigm of Forest Health By Chad Hanson, Ph.D. Preface In the summer of 2002, I came across two loggers felling fire-killed trees in the Star fire area of the Eldorado National Forest in the Sierra Nevada. They had to briefly pause their activities in order to let my friends and I pass by on the narrow dirt road, and in the interim we began a conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing MODIS Net Primary Production Estimates with Terrestrial National Forest Inventory Data in Austria
    Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 3878-3906; doi:10.3390/rs70403878 OPEN ACCESS remote sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Comparing MODIS Net Primary Production Estimates with Terrestrial National Forest Inventory Data in Austria Mathias Neumann 1,*, Maosheng Zhao 2, Georg Kindermann 3 and Hubert Hasenauer 1 1 Institute of Silviculture, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Str. 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Natural Hazards and Landscape, Department of Forest Growth and Silviculture, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Vienna, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, A-1130 Vienna, Austria; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-1-47654-4078; Fax: +43-1-47654-4092. Academic Editors: Randolph H. Wynne and Prasad S. Thenkabail Received: 11 December 2014 / Accepted: 17 March 2015 / Published: 1 April 2015 Abstract: The mission of this study is to compare Net Primary Productivity (NPP) estimates using (i) forest inventory data and (ii) spatio-temporally continuous MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) remote sensing data for Austria. While forest inventories assess the change in forest growth based on repeated individual tree measurements (DBH, height etc.), the MODIS NPP estimates are based on ecophysiological processes such as photosynthesis, respiration and carbon allocation. We obtained repeated national forest inventory data from Austria, calculated a “ground-based” NPP estimate and compared the results with “space-based” MODIS NPP estimates using different daily climate data.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology for Afforestation And
    METHODOLOGY FOR THE QUANTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING AND VERIFICATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS AND REMOVALS FROM AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION OF DEGRADED LAND VERSION 1.2 May 2017 METHODOLOGY FOR THE QUANTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING AND VERIFICATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS AND REMOVALS FROM AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION OF DEGRADED LAND VERSION 1.2 May 2017 American Carbon Registry® WASHINGTON DC OFFICE c/o Winrock International 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 700 Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA ph +1 703 302 6500 [email protected] americancarbonregistry.org ABOUT AMERICAN CARBON REGISTRY® (ACR) A leading carbon offset program founded in 1996 as the first private voluntary GHG registry in the world, ACR operates in the voluntary and regulated carbon markets. ACR has unparalleled experience in the development of environmentally rigorous, science-based offset methodolo- gies as well as operational experience in the oversight of offset project verification, registration, offset issuance and retirement reporting through its online registry system. © 2017 American Carbon Registry at Winrock International. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced, displayed, modified or distributed without express written permission of the American Carbon Registry. The sole permitted use of the publication is for the registration of projects on the American Carbon Registry. For requests to license the publication or any part thereof for a different use, write to the Washington DC address listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • Reineke's Stand Density Index
    Reineke’s Stand Density Index: Where Are We and Where Do We Go From Here? John D. Shaw USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 507 25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401 [email protected] Citation: Shaw, J.D. 2006. Reineke’s Stand Density Index: Where are we and where do we go from here? Proceedings: Society of American Foresters 2005 National Convention. October 19-23, 2005, Ft. Worth, TX. [published on CD-ROM]: Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD. REINEKE’S STAND DENSITY INDEX: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? John D. Shaw USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis 507 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 Email: [email protected] Abstract: In recent years there has been renewed interest in Reineke’s Stand Density Index (SDI). Although originally described as a measurement of relative density in single-species, even-aged stands, it has since been generalized for use in uneven-aged stands and its use in multi-species stands is an active area of investigation. Some investigators use a strict definition of SDI and consider indicies developed for mixed and irregularly structured stands to be distinct from Reineke’s. In addition, there is ongoing debate over the use of standard or variable exponents to describe the self-thinning relationship that is integral to SDI. This paper describes the history and characteristics of SDI, its use in silvicultural applications, and extensions to the concept. Keywords: Stand Density Index, self-thinning, density management diagrams, silviculture, stand dynamics INTRODUCTION Silviculturists have long sought, and continue to seek, simple and effective indicies of competition in forest stands.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Measurement with Relascope Practical Description for Fieldwork with Examples for Estonia
    Jüri Järvis FOREST MEASUREMENT Practical descriptionWITH for fieldwork RELASCOPE with examples for Estonia Partial stand description Average The Area Layer / Average Average Average relative stand number of the Volume Volume composition age height diameter density RSD of the stand m3/ha m3/stand description % (y) (m) (cm) (%) / stand (ha) G (m2/ha) 1 2.0 I aspen 52 55 25 27 42.0/15 166 332 I birch 25 55 25 26 23.7/7 79 158 I spruce 23 57 23 23 18.1/6.5 73 146 TOTAL: 83.8/28.5 318 636 II spruce 100 25 10 10 22.8/5 30 60 TOTAL: 348 696 The relascope and relascope measurement was invented Title of the original: Metsa relaskoopmõõtmine. Puistu rinnaspindala, täiuse ja mahu and introduced by Austrian forest scientist Walter Bitterlich määramine lihtrelaskoopi kasutades. (Bitterlich 1947, 1948). The method is widely used because II täiendatud trükk (2010). it is simple, handy and quick. However, the method is less accurate when compared to cross-callipering forest Translation into English 2013; first printed 2006. measurement. It is used for the preliminary assessment of timber supply in a tree stand 1. © Jüri Järvis 2010; 2013. Simplified relascope is also called “simple relascope”, All rights reserved. “angle-counter”, “angle-gauge” or “angle-template”. ­­So- called true relascope or mirror-relascope is a device that can automatically adjust its measured values according Consultants: Ahto Kangur, Allan Sims, Allar Padari, Andres Kiviste, Artur Nilson, to the slope of the ground (photo 1). Mart Vaus (Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Electronic relascope can be used instead of traditional Photo 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Impacts of National-Scale Afforestation on Carbon Budgets In
    Article Quantifying Impacts of National-Scale Afforestation on Carbon Budgets in South Korea from 1961 to 2014 Moonil Kim 1,2, Florian Kraxner 2 , Yowhan Son 3, Seong Woo Jeon 3, Anatoly Shvidenko 2, Dmitry Schepaschenko 2 , Bo-Young Ham 1, Chul-Hee Lim 4 , Cholho Song 3 , Mina Hong 3 and Woo-Kyun Lee 3,* 1 Environmental GIS/RS Center, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea 2 Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria 3 Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02481, Korea 4 Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Korea University, Seoul 02481, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-02-3290-3016 Received: 31 May 2019; Accepted: 9 July 2019; Published: 11 July 2019 Abstract: Forests play an important role in regulating the carbon (C) cycle. The main objective of this study was to quantify the effects of South Korean national reforestation programs on carbon budgets. We estimated the changes in C stocks and annual C sequestration in the years 1961–2014 using Korea-specific models, a forest cover map (FCM), national forest inventory (NFI) data, and climate data. Furthermore, we examined the differences in C budgets between Cool forests (forests at elevations above 700 m) and forests in lower-altitude areas. Simulations including the effects of climate conditions on forest dynamics showed that the C stocks of the total forest area increased from 6.65 Tg C in 1961 to 476.21 Tg C in 2014. The model developed here showed a high degree of spatiotemporal reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Usfs-Fy-2021-Budget-Justification.Pdf
    2021 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – FOREST SERVICE 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]