DOCSLIB.ORG

Fabians-Oxford Companion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fabians-Oxford Companion Fabian Socialism - Oxford Companion to Australian Politics Entry Fabian socialism owes its inception to the revulsion and agony of conscience over poverty in late Victorian England. The Fabian Society was formed in London in 1884. Its best-known members have included Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Bernard Shaw, H.G.Wells and G.D.H. and Margaret Cole. Sidney Webb endowed the Fabians with his commitment to parliamentary reform and the encapsulation of their guiding principle as ‘the inevitability of gradualness’. Shaw summarised the society’s method of working for change no less memorably, in the slogan ‘Educate. Agitate. Organise’. The society was instrumental in bringing about the foundation of the British Labour Party, and remains an affiliate of the party, with representation at the party conference. Every leader of the party has belonged to the society, and in most cases served as a member of its Executive Committee. Margaret Cole describes the new party platform – Labour and the New Social Order - which Sidney Webb and the party secretary Arthur Henderson drafted in 1918 as representing ‘as nearly as possible the purest milk of the Fabian word’. The wife of a newly elected Labor MP in Attlee’s 1945 Labour government was heard to remark following the delivery of the King’s Speech ‘It’s just like a Fabian Summer School – all the same faces’. The society’s first Australian member was the prominent Melbourne statistician, senior public servant and barrister, William H. Archer, who joined in 1890. The first of numerous overseas Fabian societies was in Australia, where an expatriate London Fabian, the Reverend Charles Marson, established the Fabian Society of South Australia in 1891 – narrowly preceding the foundation of India’s Bombay Fabian Society in 1892 - and a Melbourne Fabian Society was established in 1894 by a second expatriate, Henry Hyde Champion, who also had been instrumental in bringing about the foundation of the London society, but had not joined it. A Fabian-in-all-but-name Social Questions Committee was established in Melbourne in 1905 by the militant English trade unionist Tom Mann, and shortly evolved into the Victorian Socialist Party, and Champion was again instrumental in the establishment of a Fabian Society of Victoria in 1908. The SQC and the VSP in its Fabian phase provided a political nursery for key figures in the Labor governments which held office during or immediately after the Second World War, including the future Prime Minister, John Curtin, and John Cain Snr who became Premier in Victoria in 1952. Even so, Australian Fabianism in the period up to and including the First World War was largely ineffectual, consequent on the adversarial approach of its leading identities to the trade union movement and the Labor Party. For example, Champion notoriously described unionists involved in the 1890 Maritime Strike as ‘lions lead by asses’, and the relationship was not improved by Mann’s resignation from his position as a Labor Party organiser to head the rival Victorian Socialist Party, or the standing of VSP candidates against Labor Party candidates at the 1908 state elections. The effect was that the early Fabians inadvertently became significant contributors to a protracted estrangement of much of the Labor mainstream from intellectual influences. An impression was created that ‘intellectuals’ – Fabians among them – were people who both stabbed in the back honest, loyal trade unionists, and subverted the electoral arm with which the union movement had equipped itself in order to pursue through parliament those of its objectives that industrial action had failed to achieve for it. Champion and Mann were, in this respect, tragic figures who, with the best of intentions, did their cause more harm than good. As well, the VSP in the years of its post-Fabian decline, and later the nascent Communist Party, drained away energies which otherwise might have fuelled the development of a distinctive Fabian entity and identity in the inter-war period, and the predominantly labourist climate of opinion within the unions and the ALP was inhospitable to the Fabian emphasis on public policy research and consciousness raising. The demise of the Fabian society of Victoria in 1909 was followed by a thirty- year hiatus in overtly Fabian activity, until the establishment of a further South Australian Fabian Society in 1937, which failed to outlive the Second World War. In the near absence of explicitly Fabian organizations from the Australian political landscape throughout the twenty and more lean years of the inter-war period, Fabian thinking was spread through channels such as the Workers’ Educational Association, the group around Oswald Barnett in Victoria whose activities gave rise the ALP Slum Abolition Committee and the Victorian Housing Commission, and the Australian Institute of Political Science. It was not until the post-war period that Australian Fabianism experienced an incomparably more significant second flowering, with the appointment of Fabian-minded public servants such as H.C.Coombs to senior commonwealth and state public service positions and the establishment of much more effective Fabian Societies, in all states other than Tasmania. The instigators of the new wave and founders of the new societies included in Victoria the future Whitlam government Treasurers and Deputy Prime Ministers Frank Crean and Jim Cairns and the academics Geoffrey Serle, Alan Davies and John H. Reeves, in NSW the Attorney-General of the day Clarrie Martin and the academics Noel Butlin, Heinz Arndt and Kingsley Laffer, and In South Australia the future Premier Don Dunstan, Clyde Cameron who also held ministerial office under Whitlam and John Menadue who was to head key commonwealth departments and serve as Ambassador to Japan and CEO of Qantas. The NSW society in particular was well-connected within the Chifley government, but relations in all states soured following the government’s 1949 election defeat and the increasing influence within the party of the Catholic Social Studies Movement and the Industrial Groups which were unsympathetic or actively hostile to the Fabian outlook and approach. Subsequent revivals of activity in NSW were instigated in the 1960s by the state’s future Chief Justice, Jim Spigelman, in the 1980s by its future Premier, Bob Carr, and in the 1990s by the future Federal Parliamentary Party Leader, Mark Latham. Following an abortive attempt to establish a federal structure in 1949, the Victorian Fabian Society gradually moved to fill the gap by operating nationally, with members in every State and Territory. The new phase coincided with Whitlam’s tenure as Deputy Leader and Leader of the Labor Party. His claim in 1988 that ‘Among Australian Fabians, I am Maximus’ was no less accurate for being, in part, self-parody. The broad intellectual influences which shaped Whitlam’s outlook and actions were those of the leading London Fabian intellectual of the day, C.A.R. Crosland, and other near-Fabian scholars as the American economist J.K. Galbraith. His consistent aim was to correct the imbalance between what Galbraith termed memorably as ‘private affluence and public squalor’. It was his quintessentially Fabian conviction throughout that ‘The quality of life depends less and less on the things which individuals obtain for themselves and can purchase from their personal incomes and depends more and more on the things which the community provides for all its members, from the combined resources of the community’. He adopted the Fabian approach of sustained policy analysis and exposition from the day he entered parliament in 1952, and the seminal 1972 election policy speech was a drawings together of twenty years of systematic Fabian planning and research by networks instigated or appropriated on his behalf. His government’s great investigatory and recommendatory commissions – bodies such as the Schools Commission and the Hospitals and Health Services Commission - are best understood as having institutionalised the Fabian commitment to bringing about reform on the basis of informed public consent. Whitlam wrote and spoke widely for the society, and held office as its president. His wide-ranging interests and the breadth of the international experience on which his policies drew also served to broaden the society’s hitherto predominantly British focus. As the University of New England historian, Frank Bongiorno, points out, ‘An organization that had once been an expression of Australia’s Britishness now became an expression of Australian national sentiment and an international outlook concerned with how Australia might adapt in a postcolonial world order’. A further peak of membership and activity coincided with the run up to the election of John Cain Jnr’s Labor government in Victoria in 1982. In 1984 the Victorian, NSW, ACT and Queensland societies merged to form the Australian Fabian Society which is the largest ever Fabian body outside Britain, and at the turn of the century the society was again growing rapidly, reaching out through new networks, and exploring new technologies and techniques for the more effective conduct of its traditional activities and advancement of its long-standing goals. Race Mathews, 5/9/04 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • People, Place and Party:: the Social Democratic Federation 1884-1911
    Durham E-Theses People, place and party:: the social democratic federation 1884-1911 Young, David Murray How to cite: Young, David Murray (2003) People, place and party:: the social democratic federation 1884-1911, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3081/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk People, Place and Party: the Social Democratic Federation 1884-1911 David Murray Young A copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Durham Department of Politics August 2003 CONTENTS page Abstract ii Acknowledgements v Abbreviations vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1- SDF Membership in London 16 Chapter 2 -London
    [Show full text]
  • Public Management and Administration an Introduction
    Public Management and Administration An Introduction Third Edition Owen E. Hughes Public Management and Administration Also by Owen E. Hughes AUSTRALIAN POLITICS: Realities in Conflict (with Hugh I. Emy) INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS AND PUBLIC POLICY (editor with Brian Galligan and Cliff Walsh) WHITLAM RE-VISITED (editor with Hugh I. Emy and Race Mathews) Public Management and Administration An Introduction Third Edition Owen E. Hughes © Owen E. Hughes 1994, 1998, 2003 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First edition 1994 Second edition 1998 Third edition 2003 Published by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RC21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature and the Late-Victorian Radical Press
    Literature Compass 7/8 (2010): 702–712, 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2010.00729.x Literature and the Late-Victorian Radical Press Elizabeth Carolyn Miller* University of California, Davis Abstract Amidst a larger surge in the number of books and periodicals published in late-nineteenth-century Britain, a corresponding surge occurred in the radical press. The counter-cultural press that emerged at the fin de sie`cle sought to define itself in opposition to commercial print and the capitalist press and was deeply antagonistic to existing political, economic, and print publishing structures. Litera- ture flourished across this counter-public print sphere, and major authors of the day such as William Morris and George Bernard Shaw published fiction, poetry, and literary criticism within it. Until recently, this corner of late-Victorian print culture has been of interest principally to historians, but literary critics have begun to take more interest in the late-Victorian radical press and in the literary cultures of socialist newspapers and journals such as the Clarion and the New Age. Amidst a larger surge in the number of books and periodicals published in Britain at the end of the nineteenth century, a corresponding surge occurred in the radical press: as Deian Hopkin calculates, several hundred periodicals representing a wide array of socialist perspectives were born, many to die soon after, in the decades surrounding the turn of the century (226). An independent infrastructure of radical presses, associated with various radical organizations and editors, emerged as an alternative means of periodical production apart from commercial, profit-oriented print.1 Literature and literary discourse flourished across this counterpublic sphere, and major authors of the day published fiction, poetry, and journalism within it: in the 1880s, for example, William Morris spent five years editing and writing for the revolutionary paper Commonweal, while George Bernard Shaw cut his teeth as an author by serializing four novels in the socialist journals To-Day and Our Corner.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitlam Conf Speech 2 12 02
    ‘Among Australian Fabians, I am Maximus’: Gough Whitlam and the Fabian Approach to Public Policy Development and Advocacy. Paper to be Presented by the Hon. Dr. Race Mathews at the ‘Thirty Years Later: The Whitlam Government as Modernist Politics’ Conference, Canberra, 2 December, 2002. Maximus One in particular of the many anecdotes about Gough Whitlam stands out for me. At a low point in his government’s fortunes in 1975, his then Senate colleague and president of the Queensland Rugby League, Ron McAuliffe invited him to officiate at the Rugby Grand Final. As he and McAuliffe walked to the centre of the ground, the crowd subjected them to a torrent of abuse and beer cans that continued throughout the ceremony and their return to the pavilion. Turning to McAuliffe in mid- stride, Whitlam remonstrated: ‘McAuliffe, don’t you ever again invite me to a place where you’re so unpopular’. In a similar flight of self-parody, Whitlam asserted to a New South Wales Lloyd Ross Forum audience in 1988: ‘Among Australian Fabians, I am Maximus’.1 For all that his intention was to entertain, the designation was correct. No other Australian political leader has so comprehensively championed the core Fabian values of liberty, community, democracy, equality and the elimination of poverty. None have been so consistently Fabian in their use of objective public policy research and advocacy in the securing of informed public consent for gradualist parliamentary reform. What follows is in part a comparative politics study and in part memoir. Fabianism Fabianism resulted from the widespread revulsion and agony of conscience over poverty in late-Victorian and early Edwardian Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • H. M. Hyndman, E. B. Bax, and the Reception of Karl Marx's Thought In
    1 H. M. Hyndman, E. B. Bax, and the Reception of Karl Marx’s Thought in Late-Nineteenth Century Britain, c. 1881-1893 Seamus Flaherty Queen Mary University of London Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2 Statement of Originality I, Seamus Flaherty, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Seamus Flaherty Date: 13. 09. 2017 3 Abstract This thesis examines how the idea of Socialism was remade in Britain during the 1880s. It does so with reference to the two figures most receptive to the work of Karl Marx, H. M. Hyndman and E. B. Bax.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Fact, Fiction and Method in the Early History of Social Research
    Fact, fiction and method in the early history of social research: Clementina Black and Margaret Harkness as case-studies Ann Oakley Professor Ann Oakley Social Science Research Unit UCL Institute of Education 18 Woburn Square London WC1H ONR 0207 612 6380 [email protected] 1 Abstract The development of social science research methods by women reformers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is a largely buried history. This article examines the work of Clementina Black and Margaret Harkness, two British reformers who conducted many social investigations using a wide range of research methods. They also crossed genres in writing fiction, which was an accepted method at the time for putting forward new ideas about social conditions. Black and Harness were part of a vibrant network of women activists, thinkers and writers in late nineteenth century London, who together contributed much to the growing discipline of social science and to imaginative forms of writing about social issues. Keywords Social science; research methods; social reform; fiction. 2 Introduction Standard histories of sociology in both Europe and North America privilege the development of theory by men in academic institutions.1 This ‘origin myth’ eclipses empirical social science work done in community settings, an area of activity in which women reformers and researchers excelled in the decades around the beginning of the twentieth century. Historical narratives also pay little attention to fiction as a vehicle for transmitting accounts of social conditions, a tradition which flourished alongside the early development of social science. This article examines the use of fact and fiction and the development of social research methodology in the work of two women reformers, Clementina Black and Margaret Harkness, who both undertook and published social research and also wrote fiction in the period from the late 1870s through to the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Erwin Marquit (Physics, Univ
    EDITOR: Erwin Marquit (physics, Univ. of Minnesota) BOOK REVIEW EDITORS: Eric R. Jackson (history, Northern Kentucky Univ.) and Doris Grieser Marquit (literature, women’s studies) ASSOCIATE EDITORS: Gerald M. Erickson (classical studies, Univ. of Minnesota) Gerald Horne (African American studies, Univ. of Houston) Eric R. Jackson (history, Northern Kentucky Univ.) Jeffrey R. Kerr-Ritchie (history, Howard Univ.) April Ane Knutson (French literature, Univ. of Minnesota) Doris Grieser Marquit (literature, women’s studies) David S. Pena (philosophy, Miami Dade College) Michael Parenti (political science) Epifanio San Juan Jr. (cultural studies, Philippines Cultural Studies Center, Storrs, CT) José A. Soler (labor education, Univ. of Massachusetts, Dartmouth) Ethel Tobach (comparative psychology, City Univ. of New York) Prasad Venugopal (physics, Univ. of Detroit Mercy) VOL. 20, NOS. 3–4 (JULY/OCTOBER 2007) Sent to press October 8, 2008 Copyright © Marxist Educational Press All rights reserved Cover design by Prockat VOLUME 20, NUMBERS 3–4 July/October 2007 NST: NATURE, SOCIETY, AND THOUGHT (ISSN 0890-6130). Published quar- terly in January, April, July, and October by MEP Publications, University of Minnesota, Physics Building, 116 Church Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455- 0112. Periodicals postage paid at Minneapolis, Minnesota. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to NST: Nature, Society, and Thought, University of Minnesota, Physics Building, 116 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455-0112. Contents are indexed in Sociological Abstracts and Alternative Press Index. A complete index of all articles published in Nature, Society, and Thought is given on http://www.umn.edu/home/marqu002/nst. Final Issue Author and Title Index to all volumes is included in this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Worker Co-Operatives and the A.L.P
    RACE MAIHEVVS RACE MATHEWS is Minister for the Arts and Victorian Fabian Society Minister for Police and Emergency Services in Pamphlet 39 Victoria's Labor Government. He has represented $1.50 Oakleigh in the Victorian Legislative Assembly since 1979, and, is secretary of the Victorian Fabian Society. j He rvas Principal Private Secretary to Gough Whitlam i' :i: ,r I i,, as Leader of the Opposition in the Australian Parliament 1967-72, Member of the House of Representatives for Casey 1972-75, and Principal Worker Co-operatives Secretary to Clyde Holding and Frank Wilkes as Leaders of the Opposition in the Victorian Parliament and the A.L.P. 1976-79. BUILDING THE SOCIETY OF EQUALS Worker Co-opGratives and the A.L.P. by Race tlathews Uictorian Fabian Society Pamphlet llumber 39 BUILDING THE SOCIETY OF EQUALS Worker Go.op€ratives and the A.L.P. For Bob Murray who prodded me into drawing together the proof that worker co- Most of us never control the way our poverty line; where l07o and more of operatives are a practical proposition. daily work is done, or the use to which it is those who want jobs are unable to find put. Nor are the profits or losses our own. them; and every form of job-creating Worker co-operatives are different. activity from building a house to The workers in a worker co-operative are starting a business-can be obstructed or all member-owners, and membership aborted by the high price of money. cannot be held by anybody else. Nor is this atl.
    [Show full text]
  • Truly, Much Can Be Done!'': Cooperative Economics From
    “Truly, Much Can Be Done!”: Cooperative Economics from the Book of Acts to Pope Francis Nathan Schneider University of Colorado Boulder PREPRINT for Care for the World: Laudato Si’ and Catholic Social Thought in an Era of Climate Crisis, edited by Frank Pasquale (Cambridge University Press, 2019)1 At several key moments in Laudato Si’, Pope Francis makes passing reference to cooperative economics – when speaking of a more human relationship with technology, for instance, and in relation to sustainable energy production. Reading these in light of his past statements on economic cooperation, it is evident that “cooperative,” for him, is no vague nicety; rather, he is referring to a robust tradition of Catholic economic thought grounded in distributed ownership of the means of production and the prece- dence of persons over capital. This essay reviews the contours of the tradition that the pope is referring to, beginning with his own past statements on cooperative enterprise. It considers the foundations in biblical narratives of the early church; notions of the commons in early canon law; economic practices in monastic cultures; Catholic leadership in the emergence of modern coop- eration; and the current, complex interactions between Catholic thought and the secular resurgence of cooperative economics. In addition to tying together historical threads, it draws from re- porting on contemporary cooperative enterprise and on Francis’s pre-papal history with cooperativism in Argentina. Cooperative 1This essay considerably expands on an earlier publication of mine, “How Pope Francis Is Reviving Radical Catholic Economics,” The Nation (September 9, 2015). It has benefitted from feedback by Tim Huegerich, Mac Johnson, and Frank Pasquale.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Herbert Read to T.S. Eliot: 1 October 1949: Herbert Read Archive, University of Victoria (hereafter HRAUV), HR/TSE-170. 2. Herbert Read, The Contrary Experience: Autobiographies (London, 1963), 353, 350. 3. Isaiah Berlin, The Roots of Romanticism (London, [1965] 2000), 97. 4. For a useful discussion, see: Peter Ryley, Making Another World Possible: Anar- chism, Anti-capitalism and Ecology in Late 19th and Early 20th Century Britain (New York, 2013); Mark Bevir, The Making of British Socialism (Princeton, 2011), 256–277. 5. Martin A. Miller, Kropotkin (Chicago, 1976), 166–167; Rodney Barker, Political Ideas in Modern Britain (London, 1978), 42 passim. 6. H. Oliver, The International Anarchist Movement in Late Victorian London (London, 1983), 136; see also: 92, 132–137. For a discussion of the signifi- cance of the Congress, see: Davide Turcato, Making Sense of Anarchism: Errico Malatesta’s Experiments with Revolution (Basingstoke, 2012), 136–139. 7. W. Tcherkesoff, Let Us Be Just: (An Open Letter to Liebknecht) (London, 1896), 7. 8. The report offered short biographies of Francesco Merlino, Gustav Landauer, Louise Michel, Amilcare Cipriani, Augustin Hamon, Élisée Reclus, Ferdinand Domela Nieuwenhuis, Bernard Lazare, and Peter Kropotkin. N.A., Full Report of the Proceedings of the International Workers’ Congress, London, July and August, 1896 (London, 1896), 67–72. 9. N.A., Full Report of the Proceedings, 21, 17. 10. Matthew S. Adams, ‘Herbert Read and the fluid memory of the First World War: Poetry, Prose, and Polemic’, Historical Research (2014), 1–22; Janet S.K. Watson, Fighting Different Wars: Experience, Memory, and the First World War in Britain (Cambridge, 2004), 226.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gissing Newsletter
    THE GISSING NEWSLETTER “More than most men am I dependent on sympathy to bring out the best that is in me.” – George Gissing’s Commonplace Book. ********************************** Volume VIII, Number 1 January, 1972 ********************************** -- 1 -- The New Edition of The Odd Women A review copy of the Norton paperback edition of The Odd Women (N610, $1.95) reached the editor just in time to be mentioned in the October issue. This edition should be on the shelves of all Gissingites. The text which has been used is that of the Blond/Stein and Day edition of 1968, but it has been revised as a casual glance at page 214 will show. The few words which had been skipped by the printers of the former edition have duly been restored. The book has a short biographical note which is correct in all respects but one—it states that Gissing was expelled from Owens College “as an indirect result of a disastrous marriage.” After reading on the back cover a very appropriate judgment of Walter Allen to the effect that “in The Odd Women [Gissing] achieved one of the very few novels in English that can be compared with those of the French naturalists who were his contemporaries,” the potential buyer is invited to *************************************************** Editorial Board Pierre Coustillas, Editor, University of Lille Shigeru Koike, Tokyo Metropolitan University Jacob Korg, University of Washington, Seattle Editorial correspondence should be sent to the editor: 10, rue Gay-Lussac, 59-LA MADELEINE, France and all other correspondence to: C. C. KOHLER, 141 High Street, Dorking, Surrey, England. Subscriptions Private Subscribers: 62½p per annum ($1.50) Libraries: £1.25 per annum ($3.00) *************************************************** -- 2 -- peruse this very fair description of the book: Five odd women—women without husbands—are the subject of this powerful novel, graphically set in Victorian London, by a writer whose perceptions about people, particularly women, would be remarkable in any age and are extraordinary in the 1890s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Letters of William Sharp and “Fiona Macleod” Vol
    The Life and Letters of William Sharp W The Life and Letters of and “Fiona Macleod” ILLIAM Volume 1: 1855-1894 William Sharp and F. H F. WILLIAM F. HALLORAN “Fiona Macleod” William Sharp (1855-1905) conducted one of the most audacious literary ALLORAN decepti ons of his or any ti me. Sharp was a Scotti sh poet, novelist, biographer and editor who in 1893 began to write criti cally and commercially successful books Volume 1: 1855-1894 under the name Fiona Macleod. This was far more than just a pseudonym: he corresponded as Macleod, enlisti ng his sister to provide the handwriti ng and address, and for more than a decade “Fiona Macleod” duped not only the general public but such literary luminaries as William Butler Yeats and, in America, E. C. Stedman. The Life and Letters of William Sharp Sharp wrote “I feel another self within me now more than ever; it is as if I were possessed by a spirit who must speak out”. This three-volume collecti on brings together Sharp’s own correspondence – a fascinati ng trove in its own right, by a Victorian man of lett ers who was on inti mate terms with writers including Dante Gabriel Rossetti , Walter Pater, and George Meredith – and the Fiona Macleod and “Fiona Macleod” lett ers, which bring to life Sharp’s intriguing “second self”. With an introducti on and detailed notes by William F. Halloran, this richly rewarding collecti on off ers a wonderful insight into the literary landscape of the ti me, while also investi gati ng a strange and underappreciated phenomenon of late-nineteenth-century English literature.
    [Show full text]