Current Trends in Information Literacy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Current Trends in Information Literacy Current Trends in Information Literacy Library Learning Trends Elsevier’s Learning Trends Series CHANDOS PUBLISHING Table of Contents: • The Nature of Information Literacy Excerpt from: Research 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy by Tibor Koltay, Sonja Špiranec, László Z. Karvalics • Critical Thinking and Information Literacy Excerpt from: From Information Literacy to Social Epistemology by Anthony Anderson and Bill Johnston • Information Literacy Skills in the Research Process Excerpt from: New Roles for Research Librarians by Hilde Drivenes Daland and Kari-Mette Walmann Hidle • Visual literacy meets information literacy by Mary J. Snyder Broussard, Judith Schwartz Excerpt from: Skills to Make a Librarian by Dawn Lowe-Wincentsen • Science information literacy and the role of academic librarians Excerpt from: Managing Scientific Information and Research Data by Svetla Baykoucheva CHAPTER 2 The Nature of Information Literacy It is rather obvious that researchers are or should be informed citizens, not only in their everyday life but also in their professional work. This means that relying on a number of literacies is foundational to the work of today’s researcher. To gain a more accurate picture of the nature of these literacies, we can consider them from a bird’s-eye view. Such a perspective reveals three levels of literacy: • conceptual competencies that include innovative thinking, problem- solving, and critical thinking; • human competencies: social networking skills, self-management, and cross-cultural interaction skills; • practical competencies: including learning skills and information liter- acy (Lee, 2013). The best-known literacy from among practical competencies is informa- tion literacy. DEFINITIONS, DECLARATIONS, AND FRAMEWORKS The terms information literacy and information literate were coined by Zurkowski (1974) to refer to people who are able to solve their information problems by using relevant information sources and applying relevant tech- nology. As Pinto, Cordón, and Diaz (2010) point out, information literacy has stimulated considerable, long-standing interest throughout the second half of the twentieth century, and more significantly from the 1980s onward. This is shown by the number and variety of publications, regularly reviewed by Johnson et al. (2012), among others. Zurkowski’s work was the formative moment for information literacy. His approach logically perceived information literacy as a programmatic aim, and placed libraries and librarians at the core of this effort. The advent of bibliographic databases ushered in a new era of research. Early databases required significant additional technological know-how, often possessed by Research 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 61 62 Research 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy librarians only. This decisive intermediary role diminished with the appear- ance of CD-ROMs in the 1980s and finally vanished with the arrival of social media tools. Zurkowski and other early writers on the topic were undoubtedly right to see that the changes in the research landscape would result in a situation in which researchers would be left without knowledge of the technologies of searching. These new methods of searching were indispensable, and with- out them researchers would have remained practically functionally illiterate in seeking academic information. Naturally, this required education. When databases became searchable and usable by non-experts, the role of librarians as teachers of research skills was well established. The meaning of information literacy as a theory as well as a practice had yet to be clearly articulated. The appearance of the ACRL Competency Standards in 2000 was an important step forward, as it could be used to show information literacy in all its complexity, laying out achievable objectives. Information literacy became a full-fledged practice with theoretical backing. In the meantime, information seeking has become a daily activity as “googling” is employed with unbelievable frequency. However, this does not question the validity of information literacy. The question is whether we should “refocus our efforts on the educational, cultural, and technolog- ical shifts in which ‘information literacy’ per se becomes a somewhat arbi- trary label for the very stuff of learning and information discovery in today’s academic (and larger) world” (Cowan, 2014, p. 28). In a more general context, we can say that the increase in available ma- terials not only caused changes in collection management practices, but also drove the need for information literacy (Palmer & Gelfand, 2013). Definitions and descriptions of information literacy (IL) can be summa- rized as referring to 1. the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to re- trieve and disseminate information; 2. the competences to find and use the information in information (re)sources; 3. the process of recognizing information need, and finding, evaluating, and using information to acquire or extend knowledge. The third option is the most comprehensive and most useful, as it in- cludes both the use of ICT and the information (re)sources concept (Boekhorst, 2003). Perhaps the best known and widely accepted definition of IL says that in- formation literate people are able to recognize when information is needed. They are also able to identify, locate, evaluate, and use information to solve The Nature of Information Literacy 63 a particular problem (ALA, 1989). This definition has been widely used and further developed by other definitions. In their foundational work, Johnston and Webber (2003, p. 336) provide the following definition of information literacy: Information literacy is the adoption of appropriate information behaviour to ob- tain, through whatever channel or medium, information well fitted to information needs, together with critical awareness of the importance of wise and ethical use of information in society. They identify four major goals for information literacy in the information society: • information literacy for citizenship, including engagement in develop- ment by freedom of access to and critical use of data and information; • information literacy for economic growth that stimulates the develop- ment of new and existing enterprises by intensive and creative use of information and knowledge; • information literacy for employability; • information literacy for personal growth and creativity, which cuts across and contributes to achieving all the above goals (Webber & Johnston, 2000). Our previous discussion has demonstrated that all four goals are valid in the research environment. Obviously, the weight of these goals differs to some degree. If we take the role of the researcher as a citizen, we have to say that there is no room in this book for outlining this issue in its entirety and we do not intend to do so. Nonetheless, we have already pointed toward this role and mentioned developments to achieve citizen science and open science or open access, just to name a few. Critical use of information and data is crucial for information literacy and thus has found its place in this book and plays a major role in it. Without wanting to be exhaustive again, there is hardly any doubt that research contributed to economic growth and development in general. Intensive and creative use of information and knowledge is very much the essence of research. IL may not influence em- ployability directly, but writing this book would make little sense if we did not believe in its importance. The relevance of personal growth and creativ- ity is unquestionable, especially as they affect all the goals above. IL education emphasizes critical thinking (appearing in several places throughout this book, especially in the section about reading and writing) and the necessity of being able to recognize the quality of a given message. It is firmly positioned among other literacies despite a certain amount of (occasionally well-founded) skepticism, which in itself highlights the fact that information literacy and especially its lack has always been of greater 64 Research 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy importance to academic librarians than to any other group of “players” in the information and education arena (Bawden & Robinson, 2009). Different models approach information literacy from different view- points. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy in Higher Education, conceived by Christine Bruce in 1997, concentrates on experiencing information lit- eracy (Bruce, 1997). From a different point of view, we will come back to this model. Using Vannevar Bush’s vision of the technologically connected and en- abled researcher who plays key role in the information society, Johnston and Webber (2005) propose information literacy as a soft applied discipline. They contrast this approach to the characterization of information literacy as a personal attribute. As we will demonstrate, they are not the only ones directing attention to the importance of information literacy aimed at re- search and researchers. From among the numerous conceptual models of IL, we will take the approach that differentiates between three levels, that is, macro, micro, and meso, and places culture on the macro-level. The meso-level is composed of different information subcultures, and the micro-level represents the so- called individual playground. The meso-level materializes in concepts such as the information culture of individual organizations.
Recommended publications
  • Fostering Information Literacies in a Writing Course
    Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie 51 Volume 29, 2019 http://journals.sfu.ca/cjsdw Article Learner-Created Podcasts: Fostering Information Literacies in a Writing Course Stephanie Bell York University Abstract This paper describes an experimental learner-created podcasting assignment in a first-year undergraduate research skills course for professional writers. The podcasting assignment serves as a contextualized experiential writing project that invites students to refine their research skills by participating in the invention of an emerging genre of radio storytelling. The power of the podcast assignment lies in the liminal space it creates for learners. It moves students beyond familiar and regimented essay conventions to an unstable writing environment where digital tools for producing, publishing, and negotiating meaning offer a range of possible audiences, modalities, forms, and modes of meaning making. This space creates the pedagogical conditions for epistemic development, through which students adopt as their own the research practices of adept and experienced writers. The multiple demands of this course on writing, research, and digital environments generates the beginnings of interdisciplinary writing pedagogy involving Kent’s (1993, 1999) postprocess mindset, the ACRL’s (2015) Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education, Baxter Magolda’s (1999) constructive-developmental pedagogy, and Arroyo (2013)’s elaboration of participatory digital writing pedagogy. Introduction In this paper,
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Information Literacy and Teaching: an Action Research Project
    The Fifth European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL) September 18th-21st, 2017, Saint-Malo, France Abstracts Saint-Malo, 2017 The Fifth European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL) September 18th-21st, 2017, Saint-Malo, France Abstracts Editors: Sonja Špiranec, Serap Kurbanoğlu, Joumana Boustany, Esther Grassian, Diane Mizrachi, Loriene Roy, Denis Kos Information Literacy Association (InLitAs) Saint-Malo, 2017 The Fifth European Conference on Information Literacy, September 18th-21st, 2017, Saint-Malo, France: Abstracts http://ecil2017.ilconf.org Publisher: Information Literacy Association (InLitAs) http://inlitas.org ISBN 978-2-9561952-0-7 Copyright © 2017 by Information Literacy Association (InLitAs) and authors All rights reserved Organization The Fifth European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL) was co-organized by the Department of Information Management of Hacettepe University, the Department of Information and Communication Sciences of the University of Zagreb and Information Literacy Association (InLitAs), France. Standing Committee 1. Paul G. Zurkowski, USA (Honorary Chair) 2. Serap Kurbanoğlu, Hacettepe University, Turkey (General Co-chair for ECIL & ECIL 2016) 3. Sonja Špiranec, University of Zagreb, Croatia (General Co-chair for ECIL & ECIL 2016) 4. Joumana Boustany, Information Literacy Association (InLitAs), France (Co-chair for ECIL 2017) 5. Szarina Abdullah, MARA Technology University, Malaysia 6. Buket Akkoyunlu, Hacettepe University, Turkey 7. Aharon Aviram, Ben-Gurion University, Israel 8. George Awad, UNESCO Regional Office, Lebanon 9. Tomaz Bartol, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia 10. Athina Basha, Albanian Library Association, Albania 11. David Bawden, City University, UK 12. Dilara Begum, East West University, Bangladesh 13. Albert K. Boekhorst, University of Pretoria, South Africa 14. Alexander Botte, German Inst. for International Educational Research, Germany 15.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Approach Toward Publishing in Springer And
    The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals Hajar Sotudeh and Zahra Ghasempour* Purpose: The present study explored tendencies of the world’s coun- tries—at individual and scientific development levels—toward publishing in APC-funded open access journals. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a bibliometric method, it studied OA and NOA articles issued in Springer and Elsevier’s APC journals‎ during 2007–2011. The data were gathered using a wide number of sources including Sherpa/Romeo, Springer Author-mapper, Science Direct, Google, and journals’ websites. Findings: The Netherlands, Norway, and Poland ranked highest in terms of their OA shares. This can be attributed to the financial resources al- located to publication in general, and publishing in OA journals in par- ticular, by the countries. All developed countries and a large number of scientifically lagging and developing nations were found to publish OA articles in the APC journals. The OA papers have been exponentially growing across all the countries’ scientific groups annually. Although the advanced nations published the lion’s share of the OA-APC papers and exhibited the highest growth, the underdeveloped groups have been displaying high OA growth rates. Practical Implications: Given the reliance of the APC model on authors’ affluence and motivation, its affordability and sustainability have been challenged. This communication helps understand how countries at differ- ent scientific development and thus wealth levels contribute to the model. Originality/Value: This is the first study conducted at macro level clarify- ing countries’ contribution to the APC model—at individual and scientific- development levels—as the ultimate result of the interaction between authors’ willingness, the model affordability, and publishers and funding agencies’ support.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2013 Jottings& DIGRESSIONS
    College of Letters & Science UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON SCHOOL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION STUDIES Volume 44, No. 1 • Spring 2013 Jottings& DIGRESSIONS Heather Johnson and family Cynthia Lewis MA’12 Did You Know That SLIS Has a Distance MA Program? Q&A with Heather Johnson: special education with a specializa- Q&A with Cynthia Lewis MA’12: Current Distance Student tion in learning disabilities. Distance Graduate I also work 20 hours as a part- Interview by Ellen Hassel time library aide at the River Falls Interview by Ellen Hassel Public Library. I have worked there Q. Tell us about yourself. for over three years and was encour- Q. Tell us about yourself. A. My name is Heather Johnson, and aged to pursue my library degree A. My name is Cynthia Lewis, and I am in my second year of the online from the director of the library. The I am a graduate of the UW-Madison SLIS program at UW-Madison. I outstanding quality of the education SLIS Distance Program. I earned a am a mother to three amazing, that I am receiving has made me BA in English from California State- young daughters: Margaret, Adeline, better equipped to meet the specific Fullerton in 2010 and began the and Kathryn. My husband, Sam, needs of the community that I serve. UW SLIS MA program in the fall and I live on a family-owned and of 2010. After graduating from the -operated farm in River Falls, WI, Q. Tell us about your focus as a SLIS program in August of 2012, where we raise cattle and cash crops, distance student in SLIS, and what my husband and I relocated from board horses, and run more than made you decide to follow that track.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Transliteracy”?
    International Conference “Media and Information Literacy (MIL) for Knowledge Societies”, 24-28 June, 2012, Moscow, Russian Federation Can one speak of an “information transliteracy”? Vincent LIQUETE ( Bordeaux University – IMS/CNRS UMR 5218 [Human Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (Team CIH)] [email protected] / [email protected] Summary of paper: The issue of transliteracy in general and particularly informational transliteracy is increasingly being debated worldwide and from extremely varying perspectives. These concepts refer to highly varied cultural and professional realities and contexts. In this paper we will discuss three dimensions and issues. First, we will attempt to delineate the scope and range of current thinking by researchers in information and communication sciences in France with regard to informational transliteracy, and present its four main components. Second, we will lay the claim that the informational transliteracy approach goes beyond the “Media and Information Literacies (MIL)” approach, in particular by giving all due importance to issues related to learning with computers, i. e. “computation”. Finally, we will present some new thinking that is currently being implemented in the French education system and will present some research projects involving informational transliteracy (LIMIN-R project, Translit project, etc.). Key words: Transliteracy / Information culture / French educative system / Informational practice /Competencie / Forward For twenty years now, the notions of information literacy and thereafter Translitteracy have been the subject of a wide range of definitions and an extensive scientific literature, especially in the Anglo-Saxon world. We will attempt during this presentation to demonstrate some of the main dimensions in terms of skills and attitudes in the various literacies that are giving rise to the new forms of training and support required in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing
    THE OPEN SCIENCE INITIATIVE WORKING GROUP Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing The Open Science Initiative (OSI) is a working group convened by the National Science Communi- cation Institute (nSCI) in October 2014 to discuss the issues regarding improving open access for the betterment of science and to recommend possible solutions. The following document summa- rizes the wide range of issues, perspectives and recommendations from this group’s online conver- sation during November and December 2014 and January 2015. The 112 participants who signed up to participate in this conversation were drawn mostly from the academic, research, and library communities. Most of these 112 were not active in this conversa- tion, but a healthy diversity of key perspectives was still represented. Individual participants may not agree with all of the viewpoints described herein, but participants agree that this document reflects the spirit and content of the conversation. This main body of this document was written by Glenn Hampson and edited by Joyce Ogburn and Laura Ada Emmett. Additional editorial input was provided by many members of the OSI working group. Kathleen Shearer is the author of Annex 5, with editing by Dominque Bambini and Richard Poynder. CC-BY 2015 National Science Communication Institute (nSCI) www.nationalscience.org [email protected] nSCI is a US-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization First edition, January 2015 Final version, April 2015 Recommended citation: Open Science Initiative Working Group, Mapping the Future of Scholarly
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Use of Digital Literacies in Predominantly African American
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Early Childhood and Elementary Education Early Childhood and Elementary Education Dissertations Department Spring 5-12-2017 Digitally Sound? Teachers’ Use of Digital Literacies in Predominantly African American Classrooms in a Low SES Urban School Setting Ruby Champion Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/ece_diss Recommended Citation Champion, Ruby, "Digitally Sound? Teachers’ Use of Digital Literacies in Predominantly African American Classrooms in a Low SES Urban School Setting." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2017. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/ece_diss/30 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Early Childhood and Elementary Education Department at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Early Childhood and Elementary Education Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACCEPTANCE This dissertation, DIGITALLY SOUND? TEACHERS’ USE OF DIGITAL LITERACIES IN PREDOMINANTLY AFRICAN AMERICAN CLASSROOMS IN A LOW SES URBAN SCHOOL SETTING, by RUBY NESBITT CHAMPION, was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s Dissertation Advisory Committee. It is accepted by the committee members in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy, in the College of Education and Human Development, Georgia State University. The Dissertation Advisory Committee and the student’s Department Chairperson, as representatives of the faculty, certify that this dissertation has met all standards of excellence and scholarship as determined by the faculty. _______________________________ _________________________________ Mona Matthews, Ph.D. Joyce King, Ph.D. Committee Chair Committee Member _______________________________ _________________________________ Diane Truscott, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research
    Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research © 2017 Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association. This work is issued under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license CC BY-NC 4.0. Citation: Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research. Prepared by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish of OCLC Research. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2017. Association of College & Research Libraries A division of the American Library Association Chicago, Illinois 2017 Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................vii Introduction: Demonstrate the Library’s Value ........................................................................................1 Communicate the Library’s Contributions ...........................................................................................................2 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 3 Match Library Assessment to Institution’s Mission ...............................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting Reading Intervention for Online Students
    Adapting reading intervention for online students Baiyun Chen Atsusi Hirumi University of Central Florida Background Information With the advances of computer and network technologies, student enrollment in distance education has increased rapidly since the 1990’s. In 2003, it is estimated that about 40,000 to 50,000 K-12 students are enrolled in online courses nationwide (Golden, Wicks, & Williams, 2004). With the ever-increasing number of K-12 students who attend online program, researchers state in a report on virtual school in United States that “online education program(s) … already are having a significant impact on public education” (Watson, Winograd, & Kalmon, May 2004). Most likely, the K-12 online programs will take an increasingly important role in the school system of the United States. According to Building a Snapshot of Virtual Schools Across the Nation by Collins, “12 states have established online high school programs and 5 others are developing them… 25 states allow for the creation of so- called cyber charter schools, and 32 states have e-learning initiatives under way” (Collins, 2004). In the future, the option of e-learning will be available to every child for purposes of advanced study, credit recovery or remedial learning. The target population of a virtual school encompasses gifted students, students seeking credit recovery, and at-risk and dropout students. The focus of this paper is the problematic students who do not succeed in traditional classroom. The at-risk and dropout student population size is shockingly large. In 2000, some 3.8 million young adults were out of school without a high school credential, accounting for 11% of 16- to 24-year-olds in the United States (Kaufman, Alt, & MPR Associates, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • NAIRTL Report Style Sheet
    EMERGING ISSUES II The Changing Roles and Identities of Teachers and Learners in Higher Education Edited by Bettie Higgs and Marian McCarthy November 2008 PUBLICATION INFORMATION Emerging Issues II The Changing Roles and Identities of Teachers and Learners in Higher Education Edited by: Bettie Higgs and Marian McCarthy Designed by: Imogen Bertin Published and distributed by: NAIRTL Printed by: City Print Ltd Copy Editing: Catherine Pratt Cover picture: Aerial view, Inchydoney Island Lodge & Spa Hotel Copyright © NAIRTL 2008 The National Academy for Integration of Research & Teaching & Learning (NAIRTL) is a SIF funded collaborative initiative between University College Cork (lead partner), Cork Institute of Technology, National University of Ireland Galway, Trinity College Dublin and Waterford Institute of Technology. The National Academy proposes to support graduate students, researchers and academic staff to implement and advance effective research- informed teaching and learning practices for diverse audiences. For further information on other educational activities undertaken by NAIRTL email [email protected] or write to: NAIRTL Distillery House North Mall University College Cork Ireland http://www.nairtl.ie ISBN 978-1-906642-01-3 Original Works The separate and original works comprising this collection are subject to copyright by their individual authors. The aggregation of the works into the collection and all ancillary original works are copyright by the editors. All these original works are made available under the Creative Commons licence (http://creativecommons.org/) identified as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/3.0/). Informally, this means that you are free: • to share – to copy, distribute and display the work, and • to remix – to make derivative works.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Scientific Research in Online Information Review. Part 1
    Trends in scientific research in Online Information Review. Part 1. Production, impact and research collaboration Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent12*; Carolina Navarro-Molina2; Remedios Aguilar-Moya3; David Melero-Fuentes4; Juan-Carlos Valderrama-Zurián2 1. Instituto de Gestión de la Información y del Conocimiento (INGENIO) (CSIC-UPV), Spain. 2. Unidad de Información e Investigación Social y Sanitaria (CSIC-UV), Spain. 3. Departamento de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Católica de Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, Spain. 4. Instituto de Documentación y Tecnologías de la Información, Universidad Católica de Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, Spain. *Correspondence: [email protected] Plaza Cisneros, 4 46003-Valencia, Spain Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, Online Information Review journal, Authorship patterns, Collaborative research, Highly cited papers, Social Network Analyses. Abstract The study, based on the Web of Science, analyses 758 articles published from 2000 to 2014. Our analysis includes the publications’ output, authorship, institutional and country patterns of production, citations and collaboration. A Social Network Analysis was conducted to identify primary groups of researchers and institutions and the collaboration between countries. 1 The study reveals that 1097 authors and 453 Institutions have contributed to the journal. The collaboration index has increased progressively, and the average degree of collaboration during the study period was 1.98. The majority of the papers were contributed by professionals affiliated with a university. Highly cited papers address online and digital environments, e-learning systems, mobile services, web 2.0 and citation analyses. This work is a bibliometric analysis of a leading journal in library and information science, Online Information Review. 1. Background Online Information Review is an international journal devoted to research in the field of online information in academic, government, corporate, scientific and commercial contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • "Media and Information Literacy in the Knowledge Society", Moscow, 24
    Ministry of Culture of the Russian Fedration Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications Commission of the Russian Federation for UNESCO UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education Russian Committee of the UNESCO Information for All Programme Interregional Library Cooperation Centre Media and Information Literacy for Knowledge Societies Moscow 2013 Compilers: Evgeny Kuzmin and Anastasia Parshakova Translators: Tatiana Butkova, Yuri Kuptsov and Anastasia Parshakova Media and Information Literacy for Knowledge Societies. – Moscow: Interregional Library Cooperation Centre, 2013. – 432 p. The book includes communications by the participants and other materials of the International Conference on Media and Information Literacy for Knowledge Societies (Moscow, Russian Federation, 24–28 June, 2012), that offered a unique opportunity to identify the key existing challenges in the field, to outline policies and professional strategies for the advocacy of media and information literacy (MIL), to promote best practices and strengthen international cooperation among various stakeholders. It also contains the Media and Information Literacy Competencies Catalogue prepared by The Modern Poland Foundation (Warsaw, Poland). The authors are responsible for the choice and presentation of facts and for the opinions expressed, which are not necessarily those of the compilers. ISBN 978-5-91515-047-3 © Interregional Library Cooperation Centre Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]