DOCSLIB.ORG

Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research © 2017 Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association. This work is issued under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license CC BY-NC 4.0. Citation: Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research. Prepared by Lynn Silipigni Connaway, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish of OCLC Research. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2017. Association of College & Research Libraries A division of the American Library Association Chicago, Illinois 2017 Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................vii Introduction: Demonstrate the Library’s Value ........................................................................................1 Communicate the Library’s Contributions ...........................................................................................................2 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 3 Match Library Assessment to Institution’s Mission ...............................................................................................3 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 4 Include Library Data in Institutional Data Collection .........................................................................................4 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 5 Quantify the Library’s Impact on Student Success ................................................................................................5 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 6 Enhance Teaching and Learning ............................................................................................................................7 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 7 Collaborate with Educational Stakeholders ..........................................................................................................8 Suggested Actions ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Research Questions Requiring Further Study ................................................................................................................ 9 Using This Report ...................................................................................................................................................9 Literature Review .....................................................................................................................................10 Evaluation and Assessment Literature .................................................................................................................10 Learning and Success ............................................................................................................................................12 Measuring Student Learning and Success outside the Library ...........................................................................13 Relevant ACRL Documents ..................................................................................................................................14 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................15 Data Collection .....................................................................................................................................................16 Selected LIS and Higher Education Literature ............................................................................................................ 16 Focus Group Interviews ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Semi-structured Individual Interviews ........................................................................................................................ 17 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................18 Coding ........................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Descriptive Statistics and Post Hoc Analysis ................................................................................................................ 20 Findings ....................................................................................................................................................20 Selected LIS and Higher Education Literature ....................................................................................................21 Analysis of Studies within the Selected Literature Review .......................................................................................... 26 Differences in AiA Projects versus Non-AiA Projects .................................................................................................. 26 Focus Group Interview .........................................................................................................................................28 Provost Semi-structured Individual Interviews ..................................................................................................31 Comparing Three Data Sources ...........................................................................................................................35 Discussion.................................................................................................................................................36 Priority Areas for Future Research and Effective Practices ....................................................................43 iii Identifying the Priority Areas ..............................................................................................................................43 Identifying Effective Practices ..............................................................................................................................44 Identifying Exemplary Studies .............................................................................................................................44 Identifying Research Questions ...........................................................................................................................44 Identifying Research Designs ...............................................................................................................................45 ACRL Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success ....................................................................45 Communicate the Library’s Contributions .........................................................................................................45 General Discussion........................................................................................................................................................ 45 Effective Practices to Implement at the Library ........................................................................................................... 46 Exemplary Studies ........................................................................................................................................................ 48 Research Questions Requiring Further Study .............................................................................................................. 49 Proposed Research Design ............................................................................................................................................ 49 Match Library Assessment to Institution’s Mission .............................................................................................50 General Discussion.......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of an Academic Library in Research: Researchers’ Perspectives at a South African University of Technology
    http://sajlis.journals.ac.za 37 The role of an academic library in research: researchers’ perspectives at a South African University of Technology Genevieve Hart1 and Lynn Kleinveldt2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of the Western Cape [email protected]; [email protected] Received: 10 April 2011 Accepted: 5 May 2011 Academic libraries typically identify research support as a central pillar in their mission. But they need to examine how their mission statements relate to the perspectives of researchers themselves, especially in view of reported changes in researchers’ information seeking and sharing in the online environment. By means of a questionnaire survey of 102 full time academic staff at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, the project examined how researchers use their institution’s library in their research and what their expectations are. For various historical reasons universities of technology lag behind in terms of their research output and in recent years CPUT has prioritised research. This is reflected in the virtual unanimity among the 102 respondents that research is essential to their job despite their heavy teaching loads. Overall, the study finds that most (over 65%) continue to rely on the library for access to print and electronic resources. It finds a heavy emphasis on the traditional functions of an academic library, such as resource and information management. A few gaps emerge between the delivery of library services and researchers’ desires. For example, very few attend the library’s scheduled database training workshops; yet most see database training as one of the library’s key contributions to research.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Approach Toward Publishing in Springer And
    The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals Hajar Sotudeh and Zahra Ghasempour* Purpose: The present study explored tendencies of the world’s coun- tries—at individual and scientific development levels—toward publishing in APC-funded open access journals. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a bibliometric method, it studied OA and NOA articles issued in Springer and Elsevier’s APC journals‎ during 2007–2011. The data were gathered using a wide number of sources including Sherpa/Romeo, Springer Author-mapper, Science Direct, Google, and journals’ websites. Findings: The Netherlands, Norway, and Poland ranked highest in terms of their OA shares. This can be attributed to the financial resources al- located to publication in general, and publishing in OA journals in par- ticular, by the countries. All developed countries and a large number of scientifically lagging and developing nations were found to publish OA articles in the APC journals. The OA papers have been exponentially growing across all the countries’ scientific groups annually. Although the advanced nations published the lion’s share of the OA-APC papers and exhibited the highest growth, the underdeveloped groups have been displaying high OA growth rates. Practical Implications: Given the reliance of the APC model on authors’ affluence and motivation, its affordability and sustainability have been challenged. This communication helps understand how countries at differ- ent scientific development and thus wealth levels contribute to the model. Originality/Value: This is the first study conducted at macro level clarify- ing countries’ contribution to the APC model—at individual and scientific- development levels—as the ultimate result of the interaction between authors’ willingness, the model affordability, and publishers and funding agencies’ support.
    [Show full text]
  • University Leadership Council Redefining the Academic Library
    UniversityUniversity LeadershipLeadership CouncilCouncil IMAGE CREDIT:LIBRARY. ART RAFFAELLOBRIDGEMAN SANZIO,VATICAN. PONTIFICI, PALAZZI THESEGNATURA. SCHOOLDELLA OF ATHENS (DETAIL), STANZA Redefi ning the Academic Library Managing the Migration to Digital Information Services © 2011 The Advisory Board Company • Washington, DC ii University Leadership Council Project Director David Attis Contributing Consultant Colin Koproske Executive Director Chris Miller Lead Designers Kevin Matovich Hillary Tisdale LEGAL CAVEAT IMPORTANT: Please read the following. The Advisory Board Company has made efforts to verify the accuracy of the information The Advisory Board Company has prepared this report for the exclusive use of its members. it provides to members. This report relies on data obtained from many sources, however, Each member acknowledges and agrees that this report and the information contained herein and The Advisory Board Company cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information (collectively, the “Report”) are confi dential and proprietary to The Advisory Board Company. By provided or any analysis based thereon. In addition, The Advisory Board Company is accepting delivery of this Report, each member agrees to abide by the terms as stated herein, not in the business of giving legal, medical, accounting, or other professional advice, including the following: and its reports should not be construed as professional advice. In particular, members 1. The Advisory Board Company owns all right, title and interest in and to this Report. Except as should not rely on any legal commentary in this report as a basis for action, or assume stated herein, no right, license, permission or interest of any kind in this Report is intended that any tactics described herein would be permitted by applicable law or appropriate to be given, transferred to or acquired by a member.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing
    THE OPEN SCIENCE INITIATIVE WORKING GROUP Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing The Open Science Initiative (OSI) is a working group convened by the National Science Communi- cation Institute (nSCI) in October 2014 to discuss the issues regarding improving open access for the betterment of science and to recommend possible solutions. The following document summa- rizes the wide range of issues, perspectives and recommendations from this group’s online conver- sation during November and December 2014 and January 2015. The 112 participants who signed up to participate in this conversation were drawn mostly from the academic, research, and library communities. Most of these 112 were not active in this conversa- tion, but a healthy diversity of key perspectives was still represented. Individual participants may not agree with all of the viewpoints described herein, but participants agree that this document reflects the spirit and content of the conversation. This main body of this document was written by Glenn Hampson and edited by Joyce Ogburn and Laura Ada Emmett. Additional editorial input was provided by many members of the OSI working group. Kathleen Shearer is the author of Annex 5, with editing by Dominque Bambini and Richard Poynder. CC-BY 2015 National Science Communication Institute (nSCI) www.nationalscience.org [email protected] nSCI is a US-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization First edition, January 2015 Final version, April 2015 Recommended citation: Open Science Initiative Working Group, Mapping the Future of Scholarly
    [Show full text]
  • Information Literacy and the Future of Digital Information Services at the University of Jos Library Vicki Lawal [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Winter 11-11-2017 Information Literacy and the Future of Digital Information Services at the University of Jos Library Vicki Lawal [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Collection Development and Management Commons, and the Information Literacy Commons Lawal, Vicki, "Information Literacy and the Future of Digital Information Services at the University of Jos Library" (2017). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1674. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1674 Table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Information Literacy (IL): Definition and context 1.2. IL and the current digital environment 2. University of Jos Library: Digital context 2.1. Literature review 3. Research design and methodology 3.1. Data presentation 3.2. Discussion of findings 4. Conclusion and recommendations 1 Information Literacy and the Future of Digital Information Services at the University of Jos Library Abstract This paper highlights current developments in digital information resources at the University of Jos Library. It examines some of the new opportunities and challenges in digital information services presented by the changing context with respect to Information Literacy and the need for digital information literacy skills training. A case study method was employed for the study; data was collected through the administration of structured questionnaires to the study population. Findings from the study provide relevant policy considerations in digital Information Literacy practices for academic libraries in Nigeria who are going digital in their services.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Palau
    REPUBLIC OF PALAU Palau Public Library Five-Year State Plan 2020-2022 For submission to the Institute of Museum and Library Services Submitted by: Palau Public Library Ministry of Education Republic of Palau 96940 April 22, 2019 Palau Five-Year Plan 1 2020-2022 MISSION The Palau Public Library is to serve as a gateway for lifelong learning and easy access to a wide range of information resources and to ensure the residents of Palau will be successful, literate and resourceful in the Palauan society and the world. PALAU PUBLIC LIBRARY BACKGROUND The Palau Public Library (PPL), was established in 1964, comes under the Ministry of Education. It is the only public library in the Republic of Palau, with collections totaling more than 20,000. The library has three full-time staff, the Librarian, the Library Assistant, and the Library Aide/Bookmobile Operator. The mission of the PPL is to serve as a gateway to lifelong learning and easy access to a wide range of information resources to ensure the residents of Palau will be successful, literate, and resourceful in the Palauan society and world. The PPL strives to provide access to materials, information resources, and services for community residents of all ages for professional and personal development, enjoyment, and educational needs. In addition, the library provides access to EBSCOHost databases and links to open access sources of scholarly information. It seeks to promote easy access to a wide range of resources and information and to create activities and programs for all residents of Palau. The PPL serves as the library for Palau High School, the only public high school in the Republic of Palau.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Academic Library: What to Do Next
    Reimagining the academic library: What to do next. Review article David W. Lewis How to cite this article: Lewis, David W. (2019). “Reimagining the academic library: What to do next. Review article”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 1, e280104. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.04 Article received on November 07, 2018 Approved on December 10, 2018 David W. Lewis * https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9711-5565 Dean Emeritus, University Library Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis 522, Race Avenue, Lancaster, PA 17603, USA [email protected] Abstract This article reviews the conclusions of the author’s 2016 book,Reimagining the academic library and considers changes in scholarly communication and academic libraries that have taken place since its publication. Recommendations for alterations in the practice of individual libraries are provided. The problem of created integrated community-controlled open infrastructure is considered at length, especially the collective action problem that the library community must overcome. Keywords Academic libraries; Academic library futures; Scholarly communications infrastructure; Collective action problem; Open scholarly commons; Literature review. 1. Introduction In May of 2016, my book, Reimagining the academic library, was published (Lewis, 2016). I finished the writing it some- time in the late fall of 2015. Over three years has passed since then and in those three years there have been significant changes to the world of scholarly communication and academic libraries. In this paper I will review the main points of my book in light of what has happened in the last three years, and lay out what I believe is required of academic libraries going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • African American Research Library and Cultural Center Special Collections Preservation Project
    PG-266661-19 African American Research Library and Cultural Center Special Collections Preservation Project What activity (or activities) would the grant support? The African American Research Library and Cultural Center (AARLCC) is seeking support for the development of a two stage preservation and outreach initiative. The first output area will employ an external consultant to create a comprehensive preservation assessment report. The purpose of this assessment is to provide a thorough actionable report of archival planning needs. The scope of the assessment will cover the collections and their institutional context - the physical building, storage environment, security, access, care, conservation repair, and exhibition. Collections at AARLCC are found in the following mediums: paper, photographic, book, art, framed art, manuscript and oversized materials. Besides identifying a hierarchy of preservation needs, the report will serve as documentation for further institutional budgeting. The second output will be the completion of two preservation and collections care workshops for the general public. AARLCC is located in one of the oldest historically black communities in Broward County, Florida. Located on Sistrunk Blvd, named for one of Broward County’s first black physicians, AARLCC opened in 2002, and has served as the repository of materials related to the local, national and international voices of the African diaspora. With time, and as the surrounding neighborhoods undergo a change in population, the risk of losing valuable information is evident. The average person is unaware that their personal papers have historical value. Often, records of a community’s history are lost or discarded. Of great importance is the need to collect and preserve the history of this and other historically Black communities in Broward.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Library Association MLA '18 Poster Abstracts
    Medical Library Association MLA ’18 Poster Abstracts Abstracts for the poster sessions are reviewed by members of the Medical Library Association National Program Committee (NPC), and designated NPC members make the final selection of posters to be presented at the annual meeting. 1 Poster Number: 1 Time: Tuesday, May 22, 1:00 PM – 1:55 PM Bringing Each Other into the FOLD: Shared Experiences in Start-up Osteopathic Medical School Libraries Darell Schmick, AHIP, Director of Library Services, University of the Incarnate Word, School of Osteopathic Medicine Library, San Antonio, TX; Elizabeth Wright, Director of Library Services, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education, Library, Fort Smith, AR; Erin Palazzolo, Library Director and Professor of Medical Informatics, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine at New Mexico State University, BCOM Library, Las Cruces, NM; Norice Lee, Assoc. Library Director & Assoc. Prof. / Medical Informatics, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine Health Sciences Library, Las Cruces, NM; Molly Montgomery, Director of Library Services, Proposed Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Library, Meridian, ID; Anna Yang, AHIP, Health Sciences Librarian, California Health Sciences University, Library, Clovis, CA Objectives: To establish a communication channel for founding library administrators of new medical schools. Methods: Library directors in founding osteopathic medical schools are faced with a unique set of challenges in this role. Depending on the establishing medical school’s structure, these can be librarians in a solo capacity. Librarians in this role share experiences and best practices over a monthly meeting for their inaugural and second academic school years, respectively. Results: Meetings enjoyed robust discussion and comparison of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Educational Research Volume 9, Issue 1, 331 - 349
    Research Article doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.331 European Journal of Educational Research Volume 9, Issue 1, 331 - 349. ISSN: 2165-8714 http://www.eu-jer.com/ The Most-cited Educational Research Publications on Differentiated Instruction: A Bibliometric Analysis Mariyam Shareefa* Visal Moosa Universiti Brunei Darussalam, BRUNEI Universiti Brunei Darussalam, BRUNEI Received: October 9, 2019 ▪ Revised: December 18, 2019 ▪ Accepted: January 14, 2020 Abstract: The amount of empirical research conducted in the area of differentiated instruction (DI) is overwhelming, necessitating this bibliometric analysis in order to produce an overview of literature on the topic. The objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of the most-cited educational research published on the topic of DI using science mapping and multi-dimensional bibliometric analysis methods. To answer the research questions which were related to: i) publication, ii) authorship, iii) authors’ keywords, and iv) journals, a total of 100 articles published between 1990 and 2018, generated from SCOPUS, were analysed. The results showed that the most-cited articles and the number of publications were highest between 1995 and 2011. With a total of 545 citations “A Time for Telling”, published in the Journal of Cognition and Instruction (1998), was the most cited. The most significant keywords were: a) differentiated instruction, b) differentiation, c) curriculum, d) mathematics, and e) reading. The analysis showed that there were 283 authors who contributed to the 100 articles, and amongst them Carol McDonald Connor was the greatest contributor. It was also revealed that the great majority of the most-cited publications were from Q1-ranked journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Library Operations (2019-2020) FINAL REPORT
    FHWA-NJ-2021-002 Research Library Operations (2019-2020) FINAL REPORT January 2021 Submitted by Teri Taylor Supervising Librarian New Jersey State Library An affiliate of Thomas Edison State University NJDOT Research Project Manager Pragna Shah In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research and U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NOTICE The United States government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the New Jersey State Library, or Thomas Edison State University. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NJ-2021-002 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date FINAL REPORT December 2020 Research Library Operations (2019-2020) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Teri Taylor, NJ State Library 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. New Jersey State Library An affiliate of Thomas Edison State University PO Box 520 11. Contract or Grant No. 18-60148 Trenton, NJ 08625-0520 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration (SPR) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006285 Final Report, July 2019 – December 2020 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 New Jersey Department of Transportation (SPR) 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Library Solutions from EBSCO
    Academic Library Solutions from EBSCO Take our interactive tour to learn how EBSCO can bring together all the resources of your library to work in harmony, like a well-oiled machine. Library Management Reliable Information Collection Management Discovery & Technology Diversity of Collections Primary Sources Subject-Specific Resources Skill-Building Resources Research Output Professional Services Library Solutions for Library Management EBSCO collaborates with libraries to develop a library Management services platform that supports an open future. Home FOLIO is an open source library services platform that Professional Services for FOLIO integrates print and electronic resource management. The FOLIO open source platform is extensible, It includes core library management functionality supporting traditional resource management, but and is built on a modern architecture to ensure focused on the ability to deliver new services. FOLIO is continuous innovation, and it supports the integration of free, but running the software takes time and resources. applications from third-party providers. EBSCO offers a suite of services for libraries who want FOLIO provides improved features and workflows to run FOLIO in a cost-efficient way, but don’t have the versus legacy systems. The new model for building resources to host or the staff to support the library FOLIO is based on librarian input and collaboration. services platform. EBSCO elevates the value of the open source community by providing dedicated implementation and support services and enriched software, ensuring that FOLIO is accessible to libraries of all sizes. i Request Next Info Reliable With the prevalence of non-vetted internet content, now it is more important than ever for researchers to have access to reliable scholarly, peer-reviewed information.
    [Show full text]