DOCSLIB.ORG

From Air, Sea, and Space, Geospatial Technology Is Helping Nations Monitor One of Their Biggest and Most Understated Threats: the Open Ocean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

» CARDILLO AND LONG Q&A » FUTURE GEOINT LEADERS » SMALLSAT WORKING GROUP 2014 ISSUE 4 THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED STATES GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE FOUNDATION WATCHING THE 2014 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY WATERFrom air, sea, and space, geospatial technology is helping nations monitor one of their biggest and most understated threats: the open ocean. © DLR e.V. 2014 and © Airbus 2014 DS/© DLR Infoterra e.V. GmbH 2014 WorldDEMTM Reaching New Heights The new standard of global elevation models with pole-to-pole coverage, unrivalled accuracy and unique quality to support your critical missions. www.geo-airbusds.com/worlddem CONTENTS 2014 ISSUE 4 The USS Antietam (CG 54), the USS O’Kane (DDG 77) and the USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) steam through the Gulf of Oman. As part of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, these ships are on regularly scheduled deployments in support of Maritime Operations, set- ting the conditions for security and stability, as well as complementing counterterrorism and security efforts to regional nations. PHOTO COURTESY OF U.S. NAVAL FORCES CENTRAL COMMAND/U.S. 5TH FLEET 5TH COMMAND/U.S. CENTRAL FORCES NAVAL U.S. OF COURTESY PHOTO 02 | VANTAGE POINT Features 12 | ELEVATE Tackling the challenge of Fayetteville State University accelerating innovation. builds GEOINT curriculum. 16 | WATCHING THE WATER From air, sea, and space, geospatial technology 14 | COMMON GROUND 04 | LETTERS is helping nations monitor one of their biggest USGIF stands up SmallSat Trajectory readers offer Working Group. feedback on recent features and most understated threats: the open ocean. and the tablet app. By Matt Alderton 32 | MEMBERSHIP PULSE Ball Aerospace offers 06 | INTSIDER 22 | CONVEYING CONSEQUENCE capabilities for an integrated SkyTruth and the GEOINT enterprise. environment, National Plan Letitia Long reflects on her time at the for Civil Earth Observation, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency; 34 | HORIZONS Boeing’s 502 Phoenix Robert Cardillo shares his vision for the future. Reading List; Peer Intel. SmallSat. By Kristin Quinn 35 | APERTURE Mapping #Ebola. 08 | IN MOTION 28 | FUTURE GEOINT LEADERS Data Analytics workshop, ON THE COVER: This photo illustration depicts Northeastern University Meet the 2014 USGIF Scholarship winners. some of the many air-, water-, and space-based assets that are currently or could potentially be accredited, scholarship used for Maritime Domain Awareness, including SPECIAL SECTION sensor buoys, manned aircraft, UAVs, and satellites. spotlight, GEOINT for the Credits: MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, young adventurer. 36 | 2014 MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY Northrop Grumman, Boeing, U.S Navy. TRAJECTORYMAGAZINE.com TRAJECTORY app UNABRIDGED MORE MDA SCHOLAR DOWNLOAD Read the full-length, Learn more about PROFILES the free trajectory trajectory interviews with MDA via supple- Conversations with tablet app to view bonus Robert Cardillo and mental digital some of the 2014 material and integrated Letitia Long. resources. USGIF Scholarship multimedia content. winners. TRJ-024 VANTAGE POINT USGIF CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD The Honorable Jeffrey K. Harris USGIF CEO AND PUBLISHER FOSTERING INNOVATION Keith J. Masback “Build the Community. Advance the Tradecraft. Accelerate Innovation.” These are the strategic EXECUTIVE EDITOR pillars of USGIF. We focus on ensuring our activities, programs, and offerings to the Community Jordan Fuhr tie back to this vision. However, accelerating innovation is more challenging for us than the first [email protected] two pillars. Fortunately, innovation is very much in vogue at the moment. MANAGING EDITOR Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Frank Kristin Quinn Kendall recently announced the Defense Innovation Initiative, and his [email protected] remarks align with what we’ve all heard from Kendall’s bosses and others in our extended community. EDITOR USGIF is committed to supporting innovation, and from the Founda- Brad Causey [email protected] tion’s earliest days with our first interoperability demonstrations, USGIF has provided a trusted environment for overarching discussions and techni- ART DIRECTORS cal engagement across corporate, agency, and academic institutions—all Eliane Mangoubi while being respectful of ethics, law, policy, and the protection of intellec- Gretchen Kirchner Rund tual property. [email protected] We’re excited about the Industry Solutions Marketplace we are working on with NGA and ASSISTANT EDITOR others, supported by our member organizations. At our most recent GEOINTeraction Tuesday, Lindsay Tilton Mitchell Karyn Hayes-Ryan, the NGA component acquisition executive, and Doug McGovern, director [email protected] of NGA’s InnoVision Directorate, detailed their vision for agile, innovative acquisition and the important role USGIF and our members will play in helping the agency achieve this objective. VP MEDIA SALES In this issue of trajectory, you will find interviews with former NGA Director Letitia Long, as Janet Berta well as Director Robert Cardillo. I encourage you to read the Q&As with them here, and visit [email protected] trajectorymagazine.com for the full, unabridged versions. Both of these leaders talk to innova- AD SALES tion and the criticality of partnering more closely with industry. USGIF is perfectly placed at the Jeff Ley nexus of industry, academia, and government to help facilitate this mandate. [email protected] Additionally, our cover story about maritime domain awareness includes rich lessons to be learned about innovative approaches to operational success in a critically important mission area, including an interesting public-private partnership between the Canadian government and industry. This issue also highlights some of our Community’s achievements. Our scholarship award Trajectory is the official magazine process is very rewarding for all of us who have a hand in it, especially the volunteer USGIF of the United States Geospatial Scholarship Committee. You’ll see brief bios on each of this year’s USGIF scholarship winners Intelligence Foundation (USGIF). on page 28. Even in the short write-ups, you get a sense of their inspiring work. HOW TO REACH US One of my favorite activities is personally signing every one of our academic GEOINT Cer- LETTERS AND COMMENTS tificates. More than 450 students have earned one to date, and we now have 10 accredited schools For comments on trajectory, contact with the recent addition of the College of Professional Studies at Northeastern University and [email protected]. Fayetteville State University. FSU is a particularly exciting addition because it is the first Histori- cally Black College and University program to achieve USGIF accreditation. SUBSCRIPTIONS For information on subscribing to Finally, the back of the magazine contains the 2014 USGIF Membership Directory, a listing trajectory, sign up for free at of our nearly 250 sustaining member organizations. The breadth of the organizations continues to trajectorymagazine.com. grow, and USGIF couldn’t deliver our rich set of offerings to the GEOINT Community without the ongoing support of our membership. Please take some time to review the remarkable array USGIF MEMBERSHIP of capabilities represented in the guide, and keep this issue on your shelf as a handy resource For more information on USGIF throughout the year. or becoming a USGIF member, I hope you enjoy this issue of trajectory, and as always, we eagerly encourage your feedback so contact 888-MY-USGIF (888-698-7443). we can continue to make the magazine relevant, interesting, and fun. Best wishes for a safe and joyous holiday season, and a happy, healthy, and prosperous New Year. TWITTER @trajectorymag PUBLICATION MANAGEMENT KEITH J. MASBACK | CEO, USGIF @geointer 847-205-3000 | GLCDELIVERS.COM 2 | TRAJECTORYMAGAZINE.COM ll 2014 ISSUE 4 DATA ANALYTICS DATA IS EVERYWHERE. INSIGHT IS EVERYTHING. Raytheon leverages broad experience with data collection and processing to equip customers with cutting-edge, cost-effective data analytics solutions. We add a new level of processing, analysis, visualization and automation capabilities to nearly any data source or system — and turn big data into critical insights that fuel quicker, smarter decisions. See what makes Raytheon the number one provider of real-time intelligence. www.Raytheon.com/analytics Connect with us: © 2014 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company. IIS315_DataCloud_Traj_Mar14.indd 1 2/19/14 4:42 PM LETTERS | FROM THE FIELD Letters are the opinions of the author alone and do not represent the views or opinions of his or her respective company or organization. CONTEXTUAL CLARIFICATION for national and defense needs. That putting tens of millions of jobless young The otherwise fine article “The Defining reorganization, together with significant men on the streets? Decade of GEOINT” in the Q1 2014 technological advances, has been a Our team at the University of Mary- issue contains a misleading quote: “We tremendous boon to the development land must have solid geospatial imagery would collect imagery for a six-month of GEOINT, but the Cold War base from to build analytical models and our efforts period before we even thought about which those improvements sprang was a cannot succeed without it. Therefore, putting it into the mapping process.” The talented, experienced workforce and the when we think about wildlife crime, we author of the quote was not associated
Recommended publications
  • Universal GEOINT Credentialing Christopher K

    Universal GEOINT Credentialing Christopher K

    GEOINT ESSENTIAL BODY OF KNOWLEDGE Transparent Transportable TransIndustry USGIF is a 501(c)(3) non-lobbying, nonprofit educational foundation dedicated to promoting the geospatial intelligence tradecraft and developing a stronger community of interest between Government, Industry, Academia, and Professional Organizations. Almost 500 students Twelve Accredited Geospatial have graduated from Intelligence Certificate Programs Northeastern West Point USGIF-accredited Penn State U. of Utah programs with George Mason UM Columbia Air Force GEOINT Certificates. Redlands Academy Fayetteville State USC UT Dallas U. of South Carolina Did you know USGIF offers hundreds of hours of training, education, and professional development opportunities throughout the year? in Scholarships $792K awarded since 2004 u S gif Monograph Serie S V o L u M e 1 USGIF in 2014 published the Human Geography monograph as a community resource. Socio-Cultural Dynamics and USGIF is developing the first GEOGRAPHYChallenges to Global Security Darryl G. Murdock, Robert R. Tomes and Universal GEOINT Credentialing Christopher K. Tucker, editors Program to bolster profesional development in the GEOINT tradecraft. USGIF produces the GEOINT Symposium, the largest intelligence event in the world. Sustaining Member 240 Organizations TEN YEARS Launched in 2012 as USGIF’s first official print magazine. GEOINT ESSENTIAL BODY OF KNOWLEDGE SECTION I The GEOINT Essential Body of Knowledge �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 Transparency and Transportability
  • Space Industry Paper 2008

    Space Industry Paper 2008

    Spring 2008 Industry Study Final Report Space Industry The Industrial College of the Armed Forces National Defense University Fort McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319-5062 i SPACE 2008 The United States space industry delivers capabilities vital to America’s economy, national security, and everyday life. America remains preeminent in the global space industry, but budget constraints, restrictive export policies, and limited international dialogue are inhibiting the U.S. space industry’s competitiveness. To sustain America’s leadership among space-faring nations, the incoming administration should update and expand U.S. space policies and regulatory guidance, prioritize national space funding, and promote greater international cooperation in space. These steps will strengthen U.S. space industry. They will also enhance U.S. national security, spur technological innovation, stimulate the national economy, and increase international cooperation and goodwill. Mr. Stephen M. Bloor, Dept of Defense Mr. Robert A. Burnes, Dept of the Navy CAPT John B. Carroll, US Navy CDR Charles J. Cassidy, US Navy COL Welton Chase, Jr., US Army CDR R. Duke Heinz, US Navy Lt Col Lawrence M. Hoffman, US Air Force COL Daniel R. Kestle, US Army LtCol Brian R. Kough, US Marine Corps Col Michael J. Miller, US Air Force CDR Albert G. Mousseau, US Navy CDR Robert D. Sharp, US Navy Mr. Howard S. Stronach, Federal Emergency Management Agency CDR L. Doug Stuffle, US Navy Mr. William J. Walls, Dept of State CAPT Kelly J. Wild, US Navy Dr. Scott A. Loomer, National Geospatial-Intelligence
  • Maxar Technologies with Respect to Future Events, Financial Performance and Operational Capabilities

    Maxar Technologies with Respect to Future Events, Financial Performance and Operational Capabilities

    Leading Innovation in the New Space Economy Howard L. Lance President and Chief Executive Officer Forward-Looking Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements and information, which reflect the current view of Maxar Technologies with respect to future events, financial performance and operational capabilities. The forward-looking statements in this presentation include statements as to managements’ expectations with respect to: the benefits of the transaction and strategic and integration opportunities; the company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions; expectations for sales growth, synergies, earnings and performance; shareholder value; and other statements that are not historical facts. Although management of the Company believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed in this presentation. Additional information concerning these risk factors can be found in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory authorities, which are available online under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com, the Company’s filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or on the Company’s website at www.maxar.com, and in DigitalGlobe’s filings with the SEC, including Item 1A of DigitalGlobe’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements and are based upon data available as of the date of this release and speak only as of such date.
  • Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) During the Administrations of Presidents George W

    Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) During the Administrations of Presidents George W

    Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) During the Administrations of Presidents George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama, and Donald J. Trump: In Brief May 24, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46798 Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 2 Tables Table 1. George W. Bush Administration-era Nominees for IC PAS Positions............................... 2 Table 2. Obama Administration-era Nominees for IC PAS Positions ............................................. 5 Table 3. Trump Administration Nominees for IC PAS Positions .................................................... 7 Contacts Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 10 Congressional Research Service Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) Introduction This report provides three tables that list the names of those who have served in presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed (PAS) positions in the Intelligence Community (IC) during the last twenty years. It provides a comparative perspective of both those holding IC PAS positions who have
  • Overhead Surveillance

    Overhead Surveillance

    Confrontation or Collaboration? Congress and the Intelligence Community Overhead Surveillance Eric Rosenbach and Aki J. Peritz Overhead Surveillance One of the primary methods the U.S. uses to gather vital national security information is through air- and space-based platforms, collectively known as “overhead surveillance.” This memorandum provides an overview of overhead surveillance systems, the agencies involved in gathering and analyzing overhead surveillance, and the costs and benefits of this form of intelligence collection. What is Overhead Surveillance? “Overhead surveillance” describes a means to gather information about people and places from above the Earth’s surface. These collection systems gather imagery intelligence (IMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT) and measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT). Today, overhead surveillance includes: • Space-based systems, such as satellites. • Aerial collection platforms that range from large manned aircraft to small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). A Brief History of Overhead Surveillance Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms, collectively known as ISR, date back to the 1790s when the French military used observation balloons to oversee battlefields and gain tactical advantage over their adversaries. Almost all WWI and WWII belligerents used aerial surveillance to gain intelligence on enemy lines, fortifications and troop movements. Following WWII, the U.S. further refined airborne and space-based reconnaissance platforms for use against the Soviet Union. Manned reconnaissance missions, however, were risky and could lead to potentially embarrassing outcomes; the 1960 U-2 incident was perhaps the most widely publicized case of the risks associated with this form of airborne surveillance. Since the end of the Cold War, overhead surveillance technology has evolved significantly, greatly expanding the amount of information that the policymaker and the warfighter can use to make critical, time-sensitive decisions.
  • US National Security and Economic Interests in Remote Sensing

    US National Security and Economic Interests in Remote Sensing

    NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 7500 GEOINT Drive Springfield. Virginia 22150 Steven Aftergood Sent via U.S. mail Federation of American Scientists November 28,2012 1725 Desales Street NW, Suite 600 Re: FOIA Case Number: 20100025F Washington, DC 20036 Dear Mr. Aftergood: This letter responds to your October 29, 2009 Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA) request, which we received on October 29, 2009. You requested access to documents pertaining to "U.S. National Security and Economic Interests in Remote Sensing: The Evolution of Civil and Commercial Policy by James A. Vedda, Aerospace Corp., February 20, 2009, preparedfor NGA Sensor Assimilation Division." , A search ofNGA's system of records located one document (37 pages) that is responsive to your request. We reviewed the responsive documents and determined they are releasable in full. If you have any questions about the way we handled your request, or about our FOIA regulations or procedures, please contact Elliott Bellinger, Deputy FOIA Program Manager, at 571-557-2994 or by email at [email protected] or via postal mail at: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency FOIA Requester Service Center 7500 GEOINT Drive, MS S71-0GCA Springfield, VA 22150-7500 Sincerely, ~ Elliott Belinger Deputy FOIA Program Manager UNCLASSIFIED AEROSPACE REPORT NO. TOR-2009(3601 )-8539 U.S. National Security and Economic Interests in Remote Sensing: The Evolution of Civil and Commercial Policy 20 February 2009 James A. Yedda NSS Programs Policy and Oversight National Space Systems Engineering Prepared for: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Sensor Assimilation Division Sunrise Valley Drive Reston, VA 20191-3449 Contract No. FA8802-09-C-OOO 1 Authorized by: National Systems Group Distribution Statement: Distribution authorized to U.S.
  • Unmanned Systems Sentinel

    Unmanned Systems Sentinel

    Unmanned Systems Sentinel All opinions expressed within this newsletter are those of the respective author or authors and do not represent the official policy or positions of the Naval Postgraduate School, the United States Navy, or any other government entity. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Thanks to Robin Alexander, Mark Rindler and Marcy Huber for providing several of the below articles. 22 MAY 2016 Please keep in mind that in most instances the below summaries are excerpts from the original article. The full articles can be viewed at the accompanying hyper-links. The inclusion of these links does not represent an endorsement of the organization, service, or product. Immediately below are this edition’s highlights with links to the respective articles: NAVY/USMC: AeroVironment details Blackwing UAS (Navy to Deploy Submarine-Launched Drones) Navy Researchers to Test UAV Swarming Technology this Summer USN Expects More Development of Stingray Timeline This Year ARMY: US Army Special Operations Has Big Appetite for ISR – UAS Army tests prepare for all-domain warfare US Army tests GBSAA system Army Mulls Hybrid Electric for Next Gen Drones USAF: USAF’s Small UAS roadmap calls for swarming ‘kamikaze’ drones USAF to go small on UAS NATIONAL AIR SPACE: California has the Most Drones in US (Excellent tables and illustrations) FAA Expands Drone Detection Pathfinder Initiative FAA Key Initiatives – UAS FAA Releases Drone Registration Location Data FAA and FBI Test Drone Detection A Look Back at April Drone Law Developments:
  • Download File

    Download File

    Remote Controlled Restraint The Effect of Remote Warfighting Technology on Crisis Escalation Erik Lin-Greenberg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Erik Lin-Greenberg All rights reserved ABSTRACT Remote Controlled Restraint: The Effect of Remote Warfighting Technology on Crisis Escalation Erik Lin-Greenberg How do technologies that remove warfighters from the front lines affect the frequency and intensity of military confrontations between states? Many scholars and policymakers fear that weapons that reduce the risks and costs of war – in blood and treasure – will lead states to resort to force more frequently during crises, destabilizing the international security environment. These concerns have featured prominently in debates surrounding the proliferation and use of remote warfighting technologies, such as drones. This project sets out to evaluate whether and how drones affect crisis escalation. Specifically, do drones allow decisionmakers to deploy military forces more frequently during interstate crises? Once deployed, how do these systems affect escalation dynamics? I argue that drones can help control escalation, raising questions about scholarly theories that suggest the world is more dangerous and less stable when technology makes conflict cheaper and less risky. At the core of this project is a theory of technology-enabled escalation control. The central argument is that technologies like drones that remove friendly forces from the battlefield may lead states to use force more frequently, but decrease the likelihood of escalation when used in lieu of inhabited platforms. More specifically, these technologies lower the political barriers to initiating military operations during crises, primarily by eliminating the risk of friendly force casualties and the associated domestic political consequences for launching military operations.
  • Perspectives and Opportunities in Intelligence for U.S. Leaders

    Perspectives and Opportunities in Intelligence for U.S. Leaders

    Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE September 2018 CORTNEY WEINBAUM, JOHN V. PARACHINI, RICHARD S. GIRVEN, MICHAEL H. DECKER, RICHARD C. BAFFA Perspectives and Opportunities in Intelligence for U.S. Leaders C O R P O R A T I O N Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 2. Reconstituting Strategic Warning for the Digital Age .................................5 3. Unifying Tasking, Collection, Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination (TCPED) Across the U.S. Intelligence Community ...............16 4. Managing Security as an Enterprise .........................................................25 5. Better Utilizing Publicly Available Information ..........................................31 6. Surging Intelligence in an Unpredictable World .......................................44 7. Conclusion .................................................................................................56 Abbreviations ................................................................................................57 References ....................................................................................................58 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................64 About the Authors .........................................................................................64 The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make
  • Bottom Line up Front Trends & Issues GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE A

    Bottom Line up Front Trends & Issues GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE A

    GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE A REVOLUTION IS UNDERWAY JUNE 2015 Bottom Line Up Front In the not-too-distant past, imaging from space was the sole provenance of governments, and governments were also the primary drivers of geospatial demand and innovation; however, with the proliferation of technology, the commercial world is now taking a more prominent role in both, shifting the focus from intelligence to information. Today the commercial world is taking notice of the competitive advantage that geospatial information can create for businesses, and the lifestyle impact that it can have on everyday consumers. This recognition has caused the demand for geospatial information to grow exponentially from both government and commercial consumers. But, importantly, the change has also started to shift where innovations are born. “Non-traditional” companies, such as Google and Amazon, and new entrants are bringing a revolution through new talent, ideas, innovations, and applications to the geospatial marketplace. Trends & Issues GEOSPATIAL CAPABILITIES PROLIFERATE, GOING MAINSTREAM As technologies advance and accessibility improves, the impact of and demand for geospatial intelligence has increased significantly over the last decades. Geospatial information is going mainstream and that has caused a paradigm shift where vt innovation is born. In the future, look for the government to rely more heavily on “non-traditional” companies for leap ahead capabilities. TECHNOLOGY MATURITY EXPANDS MARKET, CREATING DEMAND Precision GPS, advanced algorithms, mobile computing, big data analytics and cloud computing are just some of the recent technological developments that have allowed geospatial data to accelerate in value. As new applications for location-based services and location-based intelligence are developed, demand will grow in both the government and commercial markets.
  • Quickbird Digitalglobe's Quickbird Satellite Offered Sub-Meter

    Quickbird Digitalglobe's Quickbird Satellite Offered Sub-Meter

    QuickBird DigitalGlobe’s QuickBird satellite offered sub-meter resolution imagery. Initially at an operational altitude of 482 km, QuickBird was operated at an altitude of 450 km and continued in an gradual descent until its end of mission life in 2015 at an altitude of 300 km. QuickBird provided commercial imagery at 0.61 m (PAN) and at 2.4 m (MS) resolution. A successful launch of QuickBird took place on Oct. 18, 2001 on a Delta-2 vehicle of Boeing from Vandenberg Air Force Base, USA and its mission life decayed in 2015. Trivia: In 2001 the QuickBird project of DigitalGlobe opted for a fairly low orbital altitude of 450 km (from the previous 600 km altitude level) to obtain a higher ground spatial resolution of the imagery; however, at the expense of swath width. Naturally, the low orbit of 450 km requires more orbit raising manoeuvres due to the increased drag influence of the atmosphere. The argument went that the S/C carries enough fuel to adjust the lower orbit more frequently over the operational lifetime of the mission. (source: eoportal.org). Fig.1 QuickBird satellite Fig. 2 QuickBird clean room pre- launch preparations QuickBird Satellite Specifications are as follow- Launch information: Date: October 18, 2001 Launch vehicle: Delta II Launch site: SLC-2W, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California Mission life: Extended through mid-2014 to 2015 Spacecraft size: 2400 lbs., 3.04 m (10 ft.) in length Altitude 450 km Altitude 300 km Orbit: Type: Sun-synchronous, 10:00 am descending node 10:00 am descending node Period: 90.4 min Period:
  • Geoeye Corp Overview

    Geoeye Corp Overview

    GeoEye Corporate Overview Presented to XIII Simposio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto April 24th , 2007 Revised: April 2007 About GeoEye • GeoEye is a leading producer of satellite, aerial and geospatial information • Core Capabilities – 2 remote-sensing satellites; 3rd this fall – 2 aircraft with digital mapping capability – Advanced geospatial imagery processing capability – World’s largest satellite image archive: > 275 sq km – International network of regional ground stations to directly task, receive and process high resolution imagery • GeoEye delivers high quality satellite imagery and products to better map, measure and monitor the world 2 Milestones 2007 • Scheduled launch for GeoEye-1 March 2006 • GeoEye acquires MJ Harden Sept • GeoEye begins trading on NASDAQ Jan • GeoEye acquires Space Imaging 2004 Sept • GeoEye Wins $500M DoD NextView contract 2003 Jun • Launch of OV-3 1999 Sept • Launch of IKONOS 1997 Aug • Launch of OrbView-2 1992 Nov • Predecessor company founded 3 Company Offerings: Imagery • Extensive Commercial Satellite Imagery Archive – IKONOS and OrbView-3 combined archive: 278 million sq km as of April 2007 – Online search for archive imagery Niagara Falls, NY Frankfurt Airport, Germany 4 Company Offerings: Value Added Applications & Production • Select Imagery Applications – National Security & Intelligence – Online Mapping / Search Engines –Homeland Defense – Oil & Gas and Mining – Air and Marine Transportation – Insurance & Risk Management – Digital Planimetric & Topographic Mapping 3-D Fly Through – Mobile GIS Services • Value-Added Production – Fused images, digital elevation models Vector (DEMs), land-use classification maps – World class facilities in: Elevation • St. Louis, MO • Thornton, CO Image • Dulles, VA • Mission, KS Bundled Product Layers 5 Company Offerings: Capacity • Satellite access • Aerial image acquisition • Ground stations – Infrastructure / Upgrades – Operations, maintenance and training Satellite Imagery can be sold almost anywhere.