DOCSLIB.ORG

Unmanned Systems Sentinel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unmanned Systems Sentinel Unmanned Systems Sentinel All opinions expressed within this newsletter are those of the respective author or authors and do not represent the official policy or positions of the Naval Postgraduate School, the United States Navy, or any other government entity. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Thanks to Robin Alexander, Mark Rindler and Marcy Huber for providing several of the below articles. 22 MAY 2016 Please keep in mind that in most instances the below summaries are excerpts from the original article. The full articles can be viewed at the accompanying hyper-links. The inclusion of these links does not represent an endorsement of the organization, service, or product. Immediately below are this edition’s highlights with links to the respective articles: NAVY/USMC: AeroVironment details Blackwing UAS (Navy to Deploy Submarine-Launched Drones) Navy Researchers to Test UAV Swarming Technology this Summer USN Expects More Development of Stingray Timeline This Year ARMY: US Army Special Operations Has Big Appetite for ISR – UAS Army tests prepare for all-domain warfare US Army tests GBSAA system Army Mulls Hybrid Electric for Next Gen Drones USAF: USAF’s Small UAS roadmap calls for swarming ‘kamikaze’ drones USAF to go small on UAS NATIONAL AIR SPACE: California has the Most Drones in US (Excellent tables and illustrations) FAA Expands Drone Detection Pathfinder Initiative FAA Key Initiatives – UAS FAA Releases Drone Registration Location Data FAA and FBI Test Drone Detection A Look Back at April Drone Law Developments: the Micro UAS Report PUBLIC SAFETY: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Applications in the Solid Waste Industry NSF grant to help NAU grow and share drone technology Robotic Lifeguard Named 'Emily' Saab delivers Sea Wasp prototypes SENSORS/APPLICATIONS: Flight Technique of Long-Eared Bats May Offer Insights That Could Improve Drones Zero Zero Hover Camera drone uses face tracking tech to follow you Stanford Researchers made a drone that can land on walls like an insect Bee model could be breakthrough for autonomous drone development Crowdsourcing App Detects Drones COUNTER UAS: Unmanned Experts Support FAA Program to Counter Rogue Drones (A different source from a similar article in the NAS section above) Counter-UAS System in Development INTERNATIONAL: COMMENTARY: Civil Liberties Debate Coming On Drone, Sat Photos Drones and the Future of Aerial Combined Arms (Interesting illustration at associated link) For The Navy, Less Must Be More A Categorical Error: Rethinking 'Drones' as an Analytical Category for Security Policy UPCOMING EVENTS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAVY/USMC: AeroVironment details Blackwing UAS The US Navy plans to deploy a new small tube-launched UAS called Blackwing from its submarines and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), AeroVironment announced on 16 May. AeroVironment developed Blackwing as part of a 2013 Joint Capabilities Technology Demonstration (JCTD) project called Advanced Weapons Enhanced by Submarine UAS against Mobile Targets sponsored by the navy and United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). According to the company, the JCTD was completed in September 2015 ‘with a strong recommendation to transition the capability into the fleet’. Blackwing has been designed to deploy from sub-surface platforms. It consists of a miniature electro- optical and infrared payload packaged with a selective availability anti-spoofing module GPS and AeroVironment’s secure Digital Data Link. It has been optimised for operation in anti-access/aerial denial environments. Kirk Flittie, vice president and general manager of UAS, AeroVironment, said: ‘AeroVironment’s new Blackwing UAS is a valuable new capability that resulted from our team’s close collaboration with, and responsiveness to, the US Navy’s undersea warfare community and the special operations community. ‘In addition to operating from undersea vehicles, Blackwing can also be integrated with and deployed from a wide variety of surface vessels and mobile ground vehicles to provide rapid response reconnaissance capabilities that help our customers operate more safely and effectively.’ https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/uv-online/aerovironment-details-blackwing-uas/ http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=2182 Return to Top Navy Researchers to Test UAV Swarming Technology this Summer In June, Navy researchers plan to shoot as many as 30 small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) into the air to see how well they can conduct wartime operations in a swarm and with little or no human direction. The flying robots are called LOCUSTs – for Low Cost Unmanned Swarming Technology. They are designed to fly together in relatively tight formations and overwhelm and “saturate a potential adversary,” said Rear Adm. Mathias Winter, chief of the Office of Naval Research (ONR). Winter discussed the LOCUST program and other ONR endeavors May 17 at the 2016 Sea-Air-Space Exposition. The LOCUST drones are designed to be smart enough to operate autonomously – with little human control. They can stay in formation, avoid running into each other and reconfigure their formations automatically to continue on with their mission even if one or more drones in the swarm are lost, said Lee Mastroianni, an ONR scientist. The Navy envisions swarms of flying drones that can be armed with sensors for gathering intelligence, jammers for disrupting enemy communication or munitions for attacking enemy targets. For now, though, the ONR’s focus on refining the software that enables the drones to fly and maneuver together autonomously. The swarm flights planned for June are to take place over land. In July, the drones will head to sea to swarm over the Gulf of Mexico before returning to shore to land, Mastroianni said. Swarms of five, 10 and up to 30 LOCUST UAVs can be operated by a single human controller, he said. For the most part, each drone is able to fly itself, controlled by an algorithm – a complex set of computer instructions – that has been modeled after the performance of birds and insects when they swarm, Winter said. Like the swarming animals they mimic, each individual drone knows where it is in relation to the others in the swarm. Each communicates location information to the other drones around it, and also keeps in contact with its human controller. LOCUST drones are launched from a compact six-tube launcher. After they are shot into the air, wings and tails pop out and a rear-mounted propeller fires up to drive the drone aloft. The launchers can be mounted on ships, aircraft, vehicles or even on other unmanned platforms. Although they can fly and maneuver in unison while in close proximity to one another, the drones would probably typically operate in formations in which they are spaced about 50 feet apart, Mastroianni said. For the Navy, though, the big issue is that a swarm of UAVs that can be controlled by a single operator, he said. Achieving workable, swarming autonomous unmanned vehicles moves the Navy a step further along the road to building unmanned vehicles that can virtually think for themselves and react to changing circumstances in combat and other operations, Winter said. Robots that smart might be operating in the air, on the sea and under the sea in about 15 years, he said. http://www.seapowermagazine.org/stories/20160517-onr.html Return to Top USN Expects More Development of Stingray Timeline This Year Excerpt: The navy is prioritizing deploying the unmanned capability on the carriers as opposed to the stealth element, so redefined the requirements to acquire a refueling ISR asset instead of a stealthy strike one. This is ultimately in line with what the navy's Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornets currently do, and will alleviate the burden on the fighters so that they can carry out the strike role. Full story: NEW ORLEANS - A risk-reduction request for proposals (RFP) for the U.S. Navy's MQ-25 Stingray unmanned air vehicle acquisition is expected to be released "this summer," which will help set out the timeline in which the service can realistically expect the tanker system to be deployed on-board its carrier fleet. Speaking to Flightglobal at the AUVSI Xponential show in New Orleans, Louisiana on 3 May, Rear Adm. Mark Darrah, PEO Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons for the navy, said that the move from a stealth intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) strike aircraft to the tanker variant now being proposed has left questions over the availability of the technology and timeframe for its development. The goal is to release a risk-reduction RFP this summer, which will be followed by an engineering, manufacturing and design RFP in early FY2017, he says. The intent it still to speak to the same four bidders that were selected for the previous iteration of the program - the unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike, or UCLASS - and the risk- reduction RFP will seek information on the technology that the companies currently have, and how much it will cost. Boeing, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman all have designs they were going to pitch for UCLASS, and are expected to modify them for the Stingray's new role. "It's giving us the opportunity to incorporate new ideas," Darrah says, and the acquisition timeline will then be set out once this information is garnered from industry. "We are definitely trying to find that sweet spot in cost and schedule," he says. "Our intent is to get this capability to the carriers as soon as possible." The navy is prioritizing deploying the unmanned capability on the carriers as opposed to the stealth element, so redefined the requirements to acquire a refueling ISR asset instead of a stealthy strike one. This is ultimately in line with what the navy's Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornets currently do, and will alleviate the burden on the fighters so that they can carry out the strike role.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Universal GEOINT Credentialing Christopher K
    GEOINT ESSENTIAL BODY OF KNOWLEDGE Transparent Transportable TransIndustry USGIF is a 501(c)(3) non-lobbying, nonprofit educational foundation dedicated to promoting the geospatial intelligence tradecraft and developing a stronger community of interest between Government, Industry, Academia, and Professional Organizations. Almost 500 students Twelve Accredited Geospatial have graduated from Intelligence Certificate Programs Northeastern West Point USGIF-accredited Penn State U. of Utah programs with George Mason UM Columbia Air Force GEOINT Certificates. Redlands Academy Fayetteville State USC UT Dallas U. of South Carolina Did you know USGIF offers hundreds of hours of training, education, and professional development opportunities throughout the year? in Scholarships $792K awarded since 2004 u S gif Monograph Serie S V o L u M e 1 USGIF in 2014 published the Human Geography monograph as a community resource. Socio-Cultural Dynamics and USGIF is developing the first GEOGRAPHYChallenges to Global Security Darryl G. Murdock, Robert R. Tomes and Universal GEOINT Credentialing Christopher K. Tucker, editors Program to bolster profesional development in the GEOINT tradecraft. USGIF produces the GEOINT Symposium, the largest intelligence event in the world. Sustaining Member 240 Organizations TEN YEARS Launched in 2012 as USGIF’s first official print magazine. GEOINT ESSENTIAL BODY OF KNOWLEDGE SECTION I The GEOINT Essential Body of Knowledge �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 Transparency and Transportability
    [Show full text]
  • From Air, Sea, and Space, Geospatial Technology Is Helping Nations Monitor One of Their Biggest and Most Understated Threats: the Open Ocean
    » CARDILLO AND LONG Q&A » FUTURE GEOINT LEADERS » SMALLSAT WORKING GROUP 2014 ISSUE 4 THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED STATES GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE FOUNDATION WATCHING THE 2014 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY WATERFrom air, sea, and space, geospatial technology is helping nations monitor one of their biggest and most understated threats: the open ocean. © DLR e.V. 2014 and © Airbus 2014 DS/© DLR Infoterra e.V. GmbH 2014 WorldDEMTM Reaching New Heights The new standard of global elevation models with pole-to-pole coverage, unrivalled accuracy and unique quality to support your critical missions. www.geo-airbusds.com/worlddem CONTENTS 2014 ISSUE 4 The USS Antietam (CG 54), the USS O’Kane (DDG 77) and the USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) steam through the Gulf of Oman. As part of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, these ships are on regularly scheduled deployments in support of Maritime Operations, set- ting the conditions for security and stability, as well as complementing counterterrorism and security efforts to regional nations. PHOTO COURTESY OF U.S. NAVAL FORCES CENTRAL COMMAND/U.S. 5TH FLEET 5TH COMMAND/U.S. CENTRAL FORCES NAVAL U.S. OF COURTESY PHOTO 02 | VANTAGE POINT Features 12 | ELEVATE Tackling the challenge of Fayetteville State University accelerating innovation. builds GEOINT curriculum. 16 | WATCHING THE WATER From air, sea, and space, geospatial technology 14 | COMMON GROUND 04 | LETTERS is helping nations monitor one of their biggest USGIF stands up SmallSat Trajectory readers offer Working Group. feedback on recent features and most understated threats: the open ocean. and the tablet app. By Matt Alderton 32 | MEMBERSHIP PULSE Ball Aerospace offers 06 | INTSIDER 22 | CONVEYING CONSEQUENCE capabilities for an integrated SkyTruth and the GEOINT enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Overhead Surveillance
    Confrontation or Collaboration? Congress and the Intelligence Community Overhead Surveillance Eric Rosenbach and Aki J. Peritz Overhead Surveillance One of the primary methods the U.S. uses to gather vital national security information is through air- and space-based platforms, collectively known as “overhead surveillance.” This memorandum provides an overview of overhead surveillance systems, the agencies involved in gathering and analyzing overhead surveillance, and the costs and benefits of this form of intelligence collection. What is Overhead Surveillance? “Overhead surveillance” describes a means to gather information about people and places from above the Earth’s surface. These collection systems gather imagery intelligence (IMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT) and measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT). Today, overhead surveillance includes: • Space-based systems, such as satellites. • Aerial collection platforms that range from large manned aircraft to small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). A Brief History of Overhead Surveillance Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms, collectively known as ISR, date back to the 1790s when the French military used observation balloons to oversee battlefields and gain tactical advantage over their adversaries. Almost all WWI and WWII belligerents used aerial surveillance to gain intelligence on enemy lines, fortifications and troop movements. Following WWII, the U.S. further refined airborne and space-based reconnaissance platforms for use against the Soviet Union. Manned reconnaissance missions, however, were risky and could lead to potentially embarrassing outcomes; the 1960 U-2 incident was perhaps the most widely publicized case of the risks associated with this form of airborne surveillance. Since the end of the Cold War, overhead surveillance technology has evolved significantly, greatly expanding the amount of information that the policymaker and the warfighter can use to make critical, time-sensitive decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Remote Controlled Restraint The Effect of Remote Warfighting Technology on Crisis Escalation Erik Lin-Greenberg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Erik Lin-Greenberg All rights reserved ABSTRACT Remote Controlled Restraint: The Effect of Remote Warfighting Technology on Crisis Escalation Erik Lin-Greenberg How do technologies that remove warfighters from the front lines affect the frequency and intensity of military confrontations between states? Many scholars and policymakers fear that weapons that reduce the risks and costs of war – in blood and treasure – will lead states to resort to force more frequently during crises, destabilizing the international security environment. These concerns have featured prominently in debates surrounding the proliferation and use of remote warfighting technologies, such as drones. This project sets out to evaluate whether and how drones affect crisis escalation. Specifically, do drones allow decisionmakers to deploy military forces more frequently during interstate crises? Once deployed, how do these systems affect escalation dynamics? I argue that drones can help control escalation, raising questions about scholarly theories that suggest the world is more dangerous and less stable when technology makes conflict cheaper and less risky. At the core of this project is a theory of technology-enabled escalation control. The central argument is that technologies like drones that remove friendly forces from the battlefield may lead states to use force more frequently, but decrease the likelihood of escalation when used in lieu of inhabited platforms. More specifically, these technologies lower the political barriers to initiating military operations during crises, primarily by eliminating the risk of friendly force casualties and the associated domestic political consequences for launching military operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives and Opportunities in Intelligence for U.S. Leaders
    Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE September 2018 CORTNEY WEINBAUM, JOHN V. PARACHINI, RICHARD S. GIRVEN, MICHAEL H. DECKER, RICHARD C. BAFFA Perspectives and Opportunities in Intelligence for U.S. Leaders C O R P O R A T I O N Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 2. Reconstituting Strategic Warning for the Digital Age .................................5 3. Unifying Tasking, Collection, Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination (TCPED) Across the U.S. Intelligence Community ...............16 4. Managing Security as an Enterprise .........................................................25 5. Better Utilizing Publicly Available Information ..........................................31 6. Surging Intelligence in an Unpredictable World .......................................44 7. Conclusion .................................................................................................56 Abbreviations ................................................................................................57 References ....................................................................................................58 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................64 About the Authors .........................................................................................64 The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make
    [Show full text]
  • Bottom Line up Front Trends & Issues GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE A
    GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE A REVOLUTION IS UNDERWAY JUNE 2015 Bottom Line Up Front In the not-too-distant past, imaging from space was the sole provenance of governments, and governments were also the primary drivers of geospatial demand and innovation; however, with the proliferation of technology, the commercial world is now taking a more prominent role in both, shifting the focus from intelligence to information. Today the commercial world is taking notice of the competitive advantage that geospatial information can create for businesses, and the lifestyle impact that it can have on everyday consumers. This recognition has caused the demand for geospatial information to grow exponentially from both government and commercial consumers. But, importantly, the change has also started to shift where innovations are born. “Non-traditional” companies, such as Google and Amazon, and new entrants are bringing a revolution through new talent, ideas, innovations, and applications to the geospatial marketplace. Trends & Issues GEOSPATIAL CAPABILITIES PROLIFERATE, GOING MAINSTREAM As technologies advance and accessibility improves, the impact of and demand for geospatial intelligence has increased significantly over the last decades. Geospatial information is going mainstream and that has caused a paradigm shift where vt innovation is born. In the future, look for the government to rely more heavily on “non-traditional” companies for leap ahead capabilities. TECHNOLOGY MATURITY EXPANDS MARKET, CREATING DEMAND Precision GPS, advanced algorithms, mobile computing, big data analytics and cloud computing are just some of the recent technological developments that have allowed geospatial data to accelerate in value. As new applications for location-based services and location-based intelligence are developed, demand will grow in both the government and commercial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Overnance & Information Infrastructure
    Price: INR / US$ 150 Subscriber’s 15 copy. Not for Sale Your Geospatial i ndustrY Ma Gazine GEOSPATIALTM WORLD Publication: 10 R.N.I No - UPENG/2010/34153; Registration no: UP/GBD-136/2014-16 FebruaRy 2014 » VOLUme 04» ISSUe 07 | ISSN 2277–3134 www.geospatialworld.net th of every month I Posting: 15 of every month I Posting: th / 20 th of every month OVERNANCE & INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE SDI - Quo Vadis? | P. 24 INSPIRE - Towards a Participatory Digital Earth | P. 32 Back to the Future: US NSDI Shows the Way | P. 42 Shaping smart change through Smart Solutions Hexagon operates on the strength of our foundation – best-in-class technologies that produce solutions to transform how critical industries tackle increasingly diffi cult challenges. Built from custom combinations of our geospatial and industrial technologies, Hexagon Smart Solutions support four key areas – safety, infrastructure, resources and manufacturing – helping customers focus on smarter ways to protect and provide for the public, build and maintain industrial facilities, optimise resources and manufacture essentials for everyday life. With decades of experience in the geospatial industry, Hexagon offers a comprehensive geospatial portfolio that captures the constant, real-time changes of our dynamic earth through satellite imagery, terrestrial and aerial photography, remote sensing, CAD and GIS. SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE RESOURCES MANUFACTURING © Copyright 2014 Hexagon. All rights reserved. IGF Double Ad.indd 2 1/30/2014 9:43:16 AM Modernising the geospatial experience Fusing real-world and digital-world data provides the power of information. Hexagon is at the forefront of this fusion, offering a comprehensive geospatial portfolio that gives customers control of important decision-making processes.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE UNIVERSITY College of Strategic
    NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE UNIVERSITY This Briefing is Classified: College of Strategic Intelligence Academic Program Review MCR 601: Intelligence and the Global Strategic Environment NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE UNIVERSITY DATE National Intelligence University - MSSl/BSI Curriculum Ma Program Learning Outcomes List {see previous slide for full verbiage 2 Please identify the 1. Global I · Strategy 13. IC Strategic 14. Critical and I 5. Leadership 6. Joint and . 0eve 1opment C b. d C . d balance of theory and Secunty d apa 111t1es an reat1ve an lnteragency application in course Environment an . Constraints Thinking Skills Management Environment 1mp 1ementat1on content. Dej!artments Courses Lea rning Outcome Coverage: 3 = Well Covered, 2 = Partially Covered, 1 = Minimally Covered, 0 = Not Covered Theo Totals CSI Program MCR-601 3 1 1 3 1 2 35% 65% 11 Totals Learning Outcome Coverage Level: 3 =Well Covered, 2 =Partially Covered, 1 =Minimally Covered, 0 =Not Covered 11. The course addresses multiple aspects of the Global Strategic Environment from a functional and regional perspective. ustification: . Th e course addresses strategy development and implementation but in an ancillary manner. More so from a development perspective than n implementation manner. Course does not teach intelligence collection or dissemination but analysis is somewhat addressed when discussing complexities associated ith security challenges that defy t raditional intelligence disciplines (e.g., how does the IC address climate change? 2"d and 3rd order analysis nd discussion of unintended consequences related to course equities does occur) . Students must exercise critical thinking skills in each assignment and in classroom discussion . This is minimally covered although some in our ci rcle believe NIPF coverage in the course should elevate this score to a 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Intelligence Community
    Tom Nobes | The Emergence and Function of the Australian Intelligence Community The Australian Intelligence Community: Why did the AIC emerge the way it did and how well has it served the nation? TOM NOBES The Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) emerged in the Commonwealth executive branch of state throughout the 20th century, methodically reconfiguring in response to royal commission and government review recommendations. The AIC’s structure continues to be altered today in the face of ‘an increasingly complex security environment’.1 Such reconfiguration has been necessary in order to create a more effective and accountable AIC that serves the executive government by protecting Australian security and safety interests. Today, the AIC agencies work within a largely legislative framework, informed by liberal ends and values that balance individual liberty and privacy against communal security and peace.2 The AIC consists of six agencies today; the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the Australian Secret Intelligence Organisation (ASIS), the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD), the Defence Intelligence Organisation (DIO), the Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation (AGO) and lastly the Office of National Assessments (ONA).3 This essay will briefly outline the development of the AIC over the last 100 years, and then discuss in detail why it emerged in the way that it did. Particular emphasis will be placed on the changes that occurred as a result of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security (1974-1977), the Protective Security Review (1979) and the Royal Commission on Australia’s Security and Intelligence Agencies (1984). The essay will then proceed to analyse the ways in which the AIC has, and hasn’t, served the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles
    Defense Science Board Study on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles February 2004 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Washington, D.C. 20301-3140 This report is a product of the Defense Science Board (DSB). The DSB is a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense. Statements, opinions, conclusions and recommendations in this report do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense. This report is UNCLASSIFIED. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3140 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3140 DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR THE ACTING UNDERSECRETARYOF DEFENSE (ACQillSmON, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS) SUBJEcr: Reportof the DefenseScience Board Task Force on UnmannedAerial Vehicles and UninhabitedCombat Aerial Vehicles I am pleasedto forward the final report of the DSB Task Force on UnmannedAerial Vehicles (UA V) and UninhabitedCombat Aerial Vehicles (UCA V). This Task Force was tasked to evaluatethe current statusof the UA Vs and UCA Vs and provide recommendationson how to betterintegrate UA Vs and UCA Vs into the force structure. The Task Force concludedit is time for the Departmentof Defenseand the Services move forward and makeUA Vs and UCA Vs an integral part of the force structure,not an "additional asset". To do so requiresappropriate planning, appropriate budgeting, and continuedmanagement attention from the Departmentof Defenseand Serviceleadership. The Task Force's findings and recommendationsfall into eight subjectareas: Introduction of UA Vs into the force structure VA V unit productioncosts UA V mishaprates Communicationsconstraints UA V interoperability and mission management Integrationof UA Vs into national airspace Focustechnology investments Reductionof UA V combatvulnerability I endorseall of the recommendationsof the Task Force and proposethat you review the Task Force Co-Chainnen's letter and the report.
    [Show full text]
  • SSCI 579, Geospatial Intelligence Tradecraft
    SSCI 579, Geospatial Intelligence Tradecraft Syllabus Units: 4 Term — Day — Time: Spring, 2019, Online Location: Online Instructor: COL [R] Steven D. Fleming, Ph.D. Office: AHF B57G Office Hours: Tuesdays 8:00‐9:00 am and Thursdays 9:00- 10:00 am PT, and by appointment at other times. I am always available asynchronously via email. I am also available for synchronous chats via phone, IM text, and audio/video conferences on most days and times by prior arrangement via email. Contact Info: [email protected], 213‐740‐7144 and https://bluejeans.com/2507438970/ Library Help: Andy Rutkowski Office: VKC 36B Office Hours: Tuesdays 10 am-noon and Thursdays 4:30- 5:30 pm PT Contact Info: [email protected], 213-740-6390, http://bit.ly/andyhangout IT Help: Richard Tsung Office: AHF 146 Office Hours: By appointment Contact Info: [email protected], 213‐821‐4415 (office) Syllabus for SSCI 579, Page 1 of 13 Course Scope and Purpose This course is a required capstone for the Graduate Certificate in Geospatial Intelligence and provides students with the requisite knowledge and practical skills to inform effective decision‐making in a variety of human security settings. Threats to human security come in many forms, including military operations, terrorist attacks, genocide, political violence, natural disasters, humanitarian crises, environmental risks, public health issues, and food/resource accessibility challenges. This class leverages a variety of geospatial technologies with intelligence tradecraft to develop intelligence products that support national security, disaster response, and humanitarian relief efforts. The geospatial intelligence approach is often referred to as tasking, collection, processing, exploitation, and dissemination (TCPED), and the results are used to inform and support more effective decision‐making.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Issue 3
    » 2016 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY » A LOOK INSIDE IARPA » GEOINT 2016 RECAPS 2016 ISSUE 3 THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE UNITED STATES GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE FOUNDATION MACHINEBIG LEARNING, UNDERSTANDING 2016 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY (SEE BACK C0VER) HOW WILL THE IC HARNESS ADVANCEMENTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? MANAGE YOUR DATA. DISCOVER ANSWERS. MAKE DECISIONS. Analysts in today’s world are expected to have the right information at their fingertips to answer urgent questions at a moment’s notice. JagwireTM allows analysts to spend less time searching for the right data and more time providing answers for time-critical operations. harrisgeospatial.com/trajectory ©2016 Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Harris Corporation. All rights reserved. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Image courtesy of DoD. Use of DoD images does not constitute or imply endorsement. CONTENTS 2016 ISSUE 3 02 | VANTAGE POINT Features 12 | ELEVATE Member feedback drives 14 NOVA Information USGIF’s marketing & | MACHINE LEARNING, Management School at communications team. BIG UNDERSTANDING How will the IC harness advancements the Universidade de Lisboa is the first international 04 | INTSIDER in artificial intelligence? GEOINT program NGA Director Cardillo By Melanie D.G. Kaplan on a new age of GEOINT; accredited by USGIF. IGAPP Grand Challenge winner 20 awarded; breaking ISIL’s brand; | QUANTUM LEAPS 25 | MEMBERSHIP PULSE DARPA pushes boundaries of The Intelligence Advanced Textron Systems space technology. Research Projects Activity tackles Geospatial Solutions the IC’s most vexing problems. 06 | IN MOTION evolves proactively to By Jim Hodges Lundahl-Finnie Award and anticipate new trends. USGIF Awards winners announced; USGIF launches SPECIAL SECTION 27 | HORIZONS Universal GEOINT Certification 2016 USGIF MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY Reading List; Peer Intel; program; USGIF accredits Flip the magazine to the back cover to view James Madison University.
    [Show full text]